CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Ole Miss-Alabama: "Let's Go Eat.Wait. What Happened?"

It's Not Time To Trade Ray Allen, ...Yet

I don't care if the salaries match, Danny won't trade me for Eddie Curry and Jared Jeffries.

More photos » Gary Dineen - NBAE/Getty Images

I don't care if the salaries match, Danny won't trade me for Eddie Curry and Jared Jeffries.

The Celtics are looking old and tired and the season has only just begun.  Expiring contracts are pure gold in this market and ones that can still score in bunches and maybe even tutor younger players are a bonus.  So it only seems logical to contemplate trading Ray Allen.  His nearly 20M expiring salary could bring back some high priced talent.  However, before you wade too far into the trade ideas forum, allow me to make the case that it is not time to trade Ray Allen, ...yet.

You are welcome to jump to your own conclusions about this team, but I don't think 14 games is enough of a sample size to determine if they are title contenders or the reincarnation of the late 80's Celtics.  The starting 5 of the Championship team is in tact and has the potential to get on a roll that won't stop till the 18th banner is raised.  For that reason alone you cannot think of trading Ray Allen yet.

I would be willing to bet that if you shopped Allen around the league, you'd find that the value you could get for him right now is not even in the ballpark of Ray's current value to the team.  He may have lost a couple steps and he can't take over games like he once could.  But when he's on, he's still the best shooter in the game.  He is ice-in-the-veins-clutch.  How many times have we seen him hit a game winning shot in both the regular season and playoffs?  That's the kind of guy you want on your side.  He's a constant threat that has to be accounted for, which allows Pierce, KG, Rondo, and others that much more space on the floor to do their thing.  There's just not going to be a player available on the market right now that can do any of that.

Star-divide

I keep saying "right now" for a reason.  Right now, half the league is waiting to see if a few early season losses are merely a slump or the symptoms of larger systemic issues.  So nobody is going to be giving up core players unless they are tremendous head cases.  Sure, you could get a decent (but flawed) player with an overinflated contract and maybe even a draft pick for Ray.  But that doesn't help us win the title now, and ties our hands financially later.

I say this with a reasonable amount of conviction because few teams have seen their situation change all that much since the summer.  All the rumors from the offseason indicated that Danny shopped Ray Allen around pretty diligently.  He knows exactly what Ray is worth on the open market and if it wasn't enough to move him this summer so I'm pretty sure it isn't enough now.

Give it some time though.  Let things simmer until Christmas and see what happens.  If the Celtics are still struggling in late December, they might have to reopen the store for business.  Teams that were holding out hope for a deep playoff run might be willing to punt the season in hopes of cashing in over the summer.  Or perhaps cash strapped teams will take a second look at their cap figures and decide that an expiring deal would be just what the doctor accountant ordered.

Of course I would imagine that Danny's first, second, and third options would be to explore trade options with Scal, Giddens, and Tony Allen.  Those three have been on the discount table for the past year and there have been no takers thus far.  Still, they get more valuable as the summer draws nearer, so you never know.

Now, none of this is to say that I blame Ray Allen for the team's woes.  He hasn't been great but I don't think he's been terrible either.  He just happens to be the easiest to move of the big three.  Pierce will retire a Celtic and KG is the definition of untradable at this point.  If you can replace an aging Ray Allen with a younger almost-All-Star talent, you have to consider that.

Still, the time to consider that option is not now.  This team needs to remain focused on the here and now and how to win the next basketball game.  I still have a lot of faith that the issues that are plaguing this team recently are fixable in nature.  If all goes according to plan, this will all be a distant memory by Christmas and we'll be talking about how the team really came together after some early season struggles.

0 recs  |  Comment 122 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from CelticsBlog

Daily Links  2/8

Feb 2010 by FLCeltsFan - 0 comments

Uncertainty Reigns

Feb 2010 by Jeff Clark - 76 comments

Daily Links 2/7

Feb 2010 by FLCeltsFan - 3 comments

Comments

Display:

I understand that Ray's expiring contract makes him tradeable.

But I’m seriously fed up with Ray taking all the blame when he is one of the only Celtics who are quite efficient and consistent. Sure, he goes through slumps like he always does, but right now, KG is more to blame for the team struggles.

So, while I understand that Ray’s expiring contract makes him an easy target, I think that people should start looking at his impact and stats before claiming “Ray is old, trade him!”.

With that said, Ray is my favorite player on this team and it would hurt to see him go. Hopefully it won’t happen. If Danny pulls the move for a good to great young star, I would be “OK” but I don’t think it will happen, I don’t see a team enough desperate to do that.

by Drucci on Nov 24, 2009 6:25 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It's about value, not blame

Drucci, I’ve seen you say this a few times now. The reason Ray’s name keeps coming up is due to his contract, not his play.

by ssspence on Nov 24, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mostly value, but not entirely

If Ray and Paul were both coming off the books next year, I’d still shop Ray first. PP is better able to take over games and he’s younger.

by Sophomore on Nov 24, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If the right deal comes along Danny will trade him…

by thebirdman on Nov 24, 2009 6:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

agreed

Good post Jeff. Also check out this link: http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS.HTM

Ray has by far the best net +/- on the team. Per 48 mins, when he is on the court the team is a +11.9 and when he is off the court, the team is a +0.3.

My only issue with Ray is what he does when he drives into traffic, but people exaggerate how much he does this.

by jdpapa3 on Nov 24, 2009 7:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed as well...

Ray has looked FAR, FAR better in terms of quickness and power going to the hoop this year. If anything, i think its his INCREASE in explosiveness has affected his shooting touch from outside early on – he is getting more lift and its altering his shot a bit.

Once Ray adjusts he will start hitting 40% of his 3’s again – shooters dont stop hitting shots with age, its the rest that goes – so, once the shots start falling he will be exceptionally dangerous attacking the rim.

Ray has not been shooting a ton and the team as whole looks to be having an offensive identity crisis….give ’em til the first of the year and I think things will look brighter…

by BillfromBoston on Nov 24, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ray Ray

Jeff, it’s a good post to get people thinking more like a GM/VP Basketball Ops lilke Danny. He has to look at the team today, next month, next year, 2 yrs from now and so forth and figure out what’s best for the Celtics. I believe his only GOAL should be to win Championships (Guess that goes without saying).

Is this team good enough or are we seeing the end of another Era. It’s possible that it’s over AGE catches up to everyone – and then you DIE!

But it’s also possible this is one of the lulls in a season, others teams have them and most are younger than us. So it’s nothing to get overly concerned about and I’m hoping that this is the case. I don’t want to see an end to this Big 3 so soon. These guys are REAL PROs.

But if it becomes apparent from our play that we just aren’t very good, then about the trade deadline Danny and Wyc will have to make the decision to blow up the team. We have about $30M in expiring contracts that can be moved. If that happens, I’d want some young talent and draft picks to rebuild, which seems reasonable.

It’s highly unlikely that we can dump enough salary to become a player in next summer’s free agent frenzy with PP and KG still on the books, plus Rondo’s new contract. So it seems to me the only options are that the team rebounds and starts playing good ball and competes for the championship, which I feel will happen (always a fan), or it doesn’t and we need to reload starting in Feb.

by badax33 on Nov 24, 2009 2:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

keep ray. he’s a hof pro. he’s a team player.he makes his free throws. unlike eddie and sheed he is a consistent 3 point shooter or at least, a more consistent shot. this one point guard stuff, puts more pressure on ray to dribble and his best game is moving off the ball and using picks. i still don"t think they run his offense enough. he is not getting the defensive backup from kg,etal that he needs to cover his man who is usually one of the best athletes on the other team. he still is in good shape. he keeps his mouth shut and is a pure class guy. he plays more minutes than any of the big 3. let’s stop with the scapegoating and get ray some good looks, or play marquis more and give ray a bit more rest.

by nazzbo on Nov 24, 2009 7:24 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Well Put...

Jeff, this was, as usual, very well put. The LAST thing I want to see happen is Danny ship out Ray Allen. Fact it, all things need to be considered.

Nick Gelso

My Blog:
http://www.northstationsports.com

Win a FREE Larry Bird Autograph plaque! Click the link below.
http://northstationsports.com/?p=653

Follow me on Facebook & Twitter:
http://northstationsports.com/?p=634

My Profile:
http://www.google.com/profiles/nicholas.gelso.

by North Station Sports on Nov 24, 2009 7:32 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I am a little lost here. Right now we cannot get enough value for Ray llen. That means that other teams are not going to be willing to give us equal value for him cause they think that Allens value has diminished (with age, why else?) But if we wait long enough, his value will increase. Allen is not like wine, which gets better with age; au contraire. If we keep attached to our players who have diminishing values as time passes, we will end up trading them for bench players from other teams.
Allen is a very good player, but due to his age, his value is diminishing as we speak. Lets get the most for him that we can. Obviously the exchange value is against us right now, by your own admision. Why? Cause we waited too long to pull the trigger?
Reality has finally caught up with our team. All things have to be considered -specially the age factor in some of our best players. The difficult question is: When does someone sell his stock, assuming the market is not going to make it grow?

by Reyquila on Nov 24, 2009 7:38 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Not Entirely

The longer we pay his salary this year, the more value his contract becomes in a trade, but only this year! Ideally we’d get a great offer for him right around the trade deadline.

by TomHamilton30 on Nov 24, 2009 8:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

His value is not as a player now, it’s as an expiring contract, so his value will not diminish as the year progresses. Granted, he has value to us as a player, but the reason another team would pick him up is for financial reasons, with an eye to letting his contract come off the books.

by Mencius on Nov 24, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They won´t trade him because of KG

If KG comes back to his old form, then the Celtics won´t mess with the starting line-up except for a player who definitely makes us a better team, and I can´t see that happening.

However, if KG doesn´t come back, then it doesn´t make sense to trade Ray, since we could use his expiring contract for ourselves. In fact, at that point, it would make more sense to trade the rest of the Big Three, too, instead of trading for a borderline all-star.

by Casperian on Nov 24, 2009 7:43 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I love the balance of the Big Three

I think that’s where a lot of the success comes from. You have the big guy in Garnett, the slasher/scorer in Pierce and the pure shooter in Ray. It’s a perfect combination of players and my worry would be that if we traded Ray we’d get more of the scorer/slasher like Pierce and we already have that. There’s great balance between the big three. And if we were to try and trade for a pure shooter we would be getting less value because in my opinion, Ray is still the best pure shooter in all of basketball.

I say we wait this out…If 25 or 30 games in we’re having the same conversations about this team’s sluggish play, then it might be time to make some sort of move, not even necessarily with Ray.

by Greg Payne on Nov 24, 2009 7:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

what ^ said

by 00dc2 on Nov 24, 2009 8:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Your point about this not being the late 80’s is actually undermined by your point that trading Ray Allen would not bring back equal value. That is exactly what happened in the late 80’s. We held on to big three because trading them would have weakened team in short term.

by pablohoney on Nov 24, 2009 7:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

At the Trading Deadline

That’s when Ray’s value will be highest. You’re correct that some teams with suitable talent are not ready to throw in the towel right now. But reality will have set in by the third week of February, not only for potential trading partners, but for the Celtics as well.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 8:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Damn you Brickowski..

I just typed that above in response to someone else.

by TomHamilton30 on Nov 24, 2009 8:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The big 3 are a great trio.

You should not break them up .

They brought us to the dance (winning us a title and putting us in contention the last 3 years) and they deserve to all stay together for one last dance until all their the end of their contracts.

But…….. if Ainge can get a great player in return for Allen should he trade him?

Of course he should, not doing so would be silly..

Allen was great for us and still can be this year, but if Ainge can trade him for a young talented player to make us better this year and in the future its simple common sense that he must pull the trade trigger for the good of the team.

by fordescort on Nov 24, 2009 8:08 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It won't be about sentiment to Ainge

If by the new year we still look old and tired, but more importantly to Ainge, that we are not legit contenders, he’ll look to trade Ray. We won’t be getting better with this core next year, so if Danny decides we can’t win with this core THIS year, then the rebuilding will officially begin, as it should.

by Mencius on Nov 24, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clutch shooting is overrated..

I’d rather get a young player in return who plays better defense, and as a result the Celtics win by double digits.

I never could stand playing pickup with someone who would give up 10 baskets b/c of subpar defense, but would gloat about their nice shot. In no way do I say this is Ray’s attitude, but I think hitting the winning shot of a game is overrated.

by TomHamilton30 on Nov 24, 2009 8:16 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

clutch is as clutch does

the ability to hit a lot of ‘clutch shots’ tracks the abilility to hit shots period.

If you are a good player, you will play more minutes and especially you will be in the final minutes of more games. If you are a good shooter then you will be taking more shots in the final minutes of more games. You will therefore be making more clutch shots over the course of time. Same with clutch hitting in baseball.

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 3:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They need to get younger

Now is the time –
Ray is the most fundamentally sound player on the team.
I’m glad I’m not the one making the decisions.
But it’s painfully obvious they’re OLD and HOBBLED and need some youth for the future.

Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk

by mcpu40 on Nov 24, 2009 8:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Winning right now

I think we need to stop worrying so much about the future…If the years like 1993-2007 taught us anything it’s that you don’t always have the opportunity to win a championship and when you are a contender you just have to go for it.

Danny’s track record with bringing in talent is good enough for me to believe the immediate Post-Three era won’t be a total train wreck, so we absolutely have to try and win now. Think of the talent on this team. It doesn’t happen very often. I say we carry on with this group and go for it.

by Greg Payne on Nov 24, 2009 8:44 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

agreed

he is going to turn it around

by tommyfan on Nov 24, 2009 8:57 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Other Assets

If you remove Ray Allen, Marquis Daniels and Sheldon Williams, the Celtics still have $11mil in expiring contracts plus Big Baby on a very manageable salary. So it may not requiring trading Ray to acquire some much needed youth / energy, therefore it’s certainly premature to decide to trade him unless a great offer comes along.

by ssspence on Nov 24, 2009 9:04 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

they're not going to last

- as currently constituted –
- -someone important is going to become injured
- – - and it’s over.
-
i can’t see how with their age showing (GLARING) thru now they can last throughout a complete playoff schedule.

Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk

by mcpu40 on Nov 24, 2009 9:04 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

No Ray trade...We already have young talented players...if Doc will play them

Trades will not fix the problem. The problem is Doc thinks the answer to everything is the OLD THREE. Everything is geared to preserve the big three. But what about the growth of the other players. Look this game survived without Oscar, Russel, West, The Cooz, Sharman, The Doctor. Mix in the young guys for meaningful continuous floor time and we win.

Trades are way out of the question. What young talented person is going to come in here and sacrifice there game the way Ray does and not squawk about it. You can get a young player that’s not the problem. The problem will be them sacrificing there game for the good of the team. Sound crazy. Think about this..you are young talented but you also have to solidify your future. Bright future ahead sound good so far…play for the Celtics and win a championship sounds even better…..but if I do that my stats go down and I won’t make as much money…Hmmmm. I think I’ll go make some money and then I’ll win a championship later. Young guy’s are not going to keep there mouth shut and make less money.

by tyquinton on Nov 24, 2009 9:08 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry, please explain..

What young talent do we have, outside of Rondo, that is better than we could get back in a Ray trade? Outside of Rondo, and to a degree Perkins, every other young player is a bench player for other teams.

by TomHamilton30 on Nov 24, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Everybody in here is a GM - makes me laugh

Ray Allen – big contract? yes… tradeable? – sure…..

He is also a class act who looks good in green and represents himself and this Celtic organization team like a young JoJo White. He can still play better than most in this league. If only all NBA players played like Ray Allen, showed the maturity of Ray Allen and represented the league like Ray Allen.

I Absolutely hope Danny Ainge goes before Ray does.

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Nov 24, 2009 9:26 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

typical

of course ray is a class act and a potential hall of famer. but it sounds like you’re satisfied as long as the Big 3 stay together, even if they don’t win a championship. there are alot of fans who want to stick to their guns, and i respect that. relationships are formed and you want to see your boys win.

but if you truly believe they won’t win, it’s hard to argue assessing the market. profeissional sports have changed, as you know, and assets are assets for better or for worse. you may not feel this way, but danny ainge does and you can be ownership does as well

by ssspence on Nov 24, 2009 10:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

two things sspence

I think they can win a championship together again….so NO I am not merely satisfied if they stay together but let this season play itself out …… it’s only November/December. If you have three guys who won a championship together (when healthy) then they deserve another full season to see if they can repeat it IMO.

2.) and I am sure DA and Wyc are assessing the market …especially DA….I just hope he doesn’t do it….and I am biased because I am not a huge fan a DA.

Have a good Thanksgving

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Nov 24, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ssspence and Master Po

It would be nice to keep these guys together and then just reload. But it doesn’t work that way. If you lose a player you can’t just replace him using his salary except via a trade. If this team can win a Championship and we’ll have a good idea by the Trade Deadline, and I tend to think they will have a very good chance to win, then they should be kept together. I would then settle in for what might be a long rebuilding process. However, if it is apparent that they can’t win, then now is the time to try and get some younger vet players and maybe some draft picks to start the rebuilding.

The salary cap now really limits what we can do if we don’t have a matching contracts. We have over $30M in expiring contracts that are valueable for 2 reasons:
1. Many teams want reduce salary to get into the 2010 summer FA frenzy.
2. With the economy like it is many teams are going to be willing to dump contracts due to low revenue.

In either case we should get good value for our expiring contract and maybe reduce or eliminate our rebuilding time. Remember you only have to get lucky on 1 draft pick – examply Big Al got us KG the rest was just filler – for us to reload around Rondo, Perk, BBD and maybe Quisy.

When Danny became the GM he talked about acquiring assets. Once he got the assets he made the moves and #17 was in the rafters. I know it’s not that easy, but he’s proven he can make it happen.

Pls understand that I’m not for breaking up this team, unless we just can’t compete for a Championship. Then, I believe, it’s the prudent thing to do.

by badax33 on Nov 24, 2009 5:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

excellent post

I especially like your first paragraph. That really sums it up.

Oddly – if they DO need to move Ray at the deadline, then they STILL in theory could end up bringing him back next year at a reduced salary. I doubt it, but it is possible.

There are a lot of variables that have to play out before we can say where this is going to go.

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 6:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yes badax33 - you do speak with logic

I would disagree with your assessment on DA but that’s a another story

anyway…good post

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Nov 24, 2009 6:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Names people are throwing out

It’s all well and good to throw out these names in potential trades…But I’m seeing some BIG names…why would those teams trade away the 1st or 2nd options on their teams (and the majority of them are younger players) just for Ray’s expiring contract when all they’re going to have to do is find young talent all over again? Whenever people throw out names they have to think of the other teams as well. The deal might sound reasonable for us or whatever, but why would that other team make the trade?

by Greg Payne on Nov 24, 2009 9:32 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Expiring copntract??

I have a mental block on this. Why is Ray’s expiring contract more valuable to other teams than it is to the Celtics? If we take back younger “value” for Ray we get no cap relief next year. Why not enjoy that cap relief for the Cs and get the most out of an aging gunslinger?

by Wildblu1 on Nov 24, 2009 9:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Bingo

Btw, why is every comment in Italic?

by Casperian on Nov 24, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No Cap Relief

Ray’s salary coming off the books puts us under the luxury tax, but it won’t put us under the cap (at least not significantly enough to sign a replacement of equal value). If we trade him we can still spend (er, Wyc can still spend) that dough over the cap on impact players. If the object is just to save money, then letting him expire is the way to go.

by Berkcelt on Nov 24, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

If KG can´t come back, then this whole project is over, and it wouldn´t make any sense to hold onto Pierce and KG.

In that situation we could use his expiring contract more than any fringe all-star to keep us a 40-win team.

by Casperian on Nov 24, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Potential Ray Allen Trades

Well, there are two scenarios.

1. Trade him for “nothing” (players you don’t want with expiring contracts) so long as you get a decent draft choice or two in the deal, and maybe a young “long shot” prospect with a low salary. Remember that the Celtics have not had an infusion of lottery talent since they drafted Al Jefferson, and the lack of real quality youth is beginning to show. Glenn Davis was a steal, but there is a reason why he went in the second round.

2. Trade him for younger players you might want but who have bad contracts on financially strapped teams. The obvious first target is Chris Paul: the deal would be Ray and Rondo for Paul and filler (probably Mo Pete and Songaila). Another deal would be Ray and cash to Charlotte for Boris Diaw and Stephen Jackson. That deal gives Charlotte a ton of cap relief, and will help Bob Johnson sell the team.

I would point out that when the Garnett deal went down, the “conventional wisdom” was that the Celtics had a three year window in which to win a championship. Well, we are in year three and it looks to me as though the window has closed. Maybe they will pull off a playoff miracle as in 1969, but I doubt it.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 10:02 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Rondo

Let me add that Rondo was a steal too, but there are reasons why he slipped as well, starting with his inability to shoot.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 10:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you're going to have to rachet up the salary obligation to get Paul

i think the Cs could put together a very attractive package for Paul, tho i don’t believe he’ll be traded this season.

but you’re going to have to add in some more cap relief to NOH’s side — at least one of Peja or Okefor and then probably Posey (over Mo Pete and Songaila) as well.

by ssspence on Nov 24, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For a chance to get CP3...

I`ll drive Ray & Rondo to the airport before the morning is over!!!

by Title 18 on Nov 24, 2009 10:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

like glen davis beats his friends?

so you’re gonna break your thumb too? hehe

by jeric on Nov 24, 2009 7:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent Post

I wouldn’t be very excited baout option 1, but option 2 is something I have been pushing for for about 6 months now.

by TomHamilton30 on Nov 24, 2009 11:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good post

That’s the way I see it too, window and all.

by Mencius on Nov 24, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Paul is not happening; not now, not ever

Because doing so is essentially franchise suicide for NO, as he’s essentially the only thing drawing in tickets right now. The only revenue for NO’s owner, George Shinn, is the Hornets franchise, so if there are no tickets, he has to sell the team and move it. The only circumstance in which they are looking to trade Paul is before he walks in 2012 and they’re absolutely certain that he’s walking.

The latter trade for Diaw and Jackson appears much more reasonable, although I’m not sure it’s a tangible upgrade. Jackson isn’t nearly as efficient as Allen and I doubt Boston wants to be paying his salary until 2013, by which time Boston will be rebuilding. Diaw is nice, but there’s already a glut in the frontcourt that he would only exacerbate.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Nov 25, 2009 4:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

without ray we'd struggle to score 80 a game

please tell me where the scoring will come from if we traded ray? rondo isn’t a scorer, Perk isn’t a scorer and right now neither are KG, Wallace or house. So where are the points going to come from? Besides Pierce there is no one else on the team that is capable of going for 30 every night. Other guys might score 30 in a game but it would be a rarity. Ray on the other hand, if given enough shots, could easily get 30 . He stinks on pick and roll D and his ball handling is suspect but he’s still better than 90% of the guys in the nba. I’ve been saying for a while that we need another shooter. I was really hoping danny would find one in the off season but those guys are hard to find so that tells you right there how hard it is to find a guy like ray allen. Who was the last great shooter in this league who also plays tough D? Maybe Dwayne Wade but he’s not a pure shooter like Ray. Dale Ellis, Reggie Miller, Dale CUrry were allpoor defensive players. MJ was probably the only shooting guard in the modern era who played great D as well as O.

by Red2 on Nov 24, 2009 10:24 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Great Shooters who Played Tough D

Kobe Bryant
John Havlicek
Joe Dumars

And if you traded Ray for CP3, I think you’d be adding a scorer, doncha think? And in my other scenario, Stephen Jackson can score just fine.

So you don’t trade Ray. You let his deal expire and then try to resign him for much less money. That’s just throwing in the towel if winning championships is what matters to you. What you would have is the second coming of Reggie Miller— the ringless Reggie Miller.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 10:43 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Fully agree...

Especially, the CP3 scenario!

But, not convince Stephen Jax is worth the “drama”.

As for Havlicek….He was a far greater “scorer” than he was a great “shooter”.

by Title 18 on Nov 24, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Amen again

You are saving me some serious typing.

by TomHamilton30 on Nov 24, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ray Allen gets somewhat of a free pass, people consider him a better player then rondo and part of the “big 3”, but when he plays bad he gets completely let off the hook, as we all know, completly different story with rondo.

Ray Allen is the highest paid player on the team
Last season in the Orlando series he completly dissapeard and was the celtics worse player, for some reason noone talked about it, all i heard was how bad rondo was.
This season he is consistently exposed on defense, and is shooting a career low from 3
Even the year we won the ship his shooting woes almost killed us in the first 2 rounds, and u can pretty much expect him to have another one this year in the playoffs

But with that said everyone who is talking about cp3 is in la la land, not to mention chris paul is a fraud

by takeit on Nov 24, 2009 11:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

This is why I was concerned with resigning Rondo before the end of the season...

We don’t have much flexibility right now. If this season ends up a bust, I would do my best to get rid of Ray and anybody else over 30. Yes even Paul.

There are only 2 corner stones left.
Rondo and Kendrick.

by Steal by Bird on Nov 24, 2009 11:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't trade Ray

He’s mature, smart on the court, our best free throw shooter, our best three point shooter. Shooters age slower than anyone else. Look at Reggie Miller. Ray will get into a slump here and there- remember the playoffs two years ago, but he can still hit the clutch shot just as good as anybody else. I don’t see why they would trade him if they were trying to win a championship this year.

Follow me @jimmy_toscano

by Jimmy Toscano on Nov 24, 2009 11:16 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Laker owner Jerry Buss spoke yesterday...Let`s hope Wyc is listening!

“We want to win as many championships as we possibly can.
We`re still a few short of our rival, and it`s our intention to catch them.

My son, when he picked up the trophy, he announced our clear-cut rival.
It`s obvious our whole family feels that way."

by Title 18 on Nov 24, 2009 11:27 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Barring a Miracle or an Unlucky Spate of Injuries...

The Los Angeles Lakers will be the 2009-2010 NBA champions.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 12:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh Sure It Does

This isn’t pessimism, it’s realism.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If you are a Lakers fan, it is optimism. I don’t even think the Lakers are going to win the West….

by thirstyboots18 on Nov 24, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that they are the odds on favorites

Sucks, but they are (as I’m sure oddsmakers would agree).

by Mencius on Nov 24, 2009 1:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I knew you'd call it that...

But how can you be so quick to assume the Lakers are head and shoulders above the rest of the league? So many teams in the league arent healthy, including the Celtics who are missing Big Baby. 14 games into the season and you’re already essentially crowning the Lakers champions if they stay healthy.

We are 10-4 without even playing good basketball. Just like the talk about 72-10 was premature, the talk about this championship window being “closed” is also a bit premature.

Follow me @jimmy_toscano

by Jimmy Toscano on Nov 24, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

thank you, jimmyt

I’m trying to understand why is it ‘realism’ to make any championship assessment (positive or negative) only 14 games into the season.

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 3:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Am I the only one who doesn't consider 10-4, 1st place in the Atlantic a failure?

I’m a life long C’s fan, originally from New England, but when I was a kid I was also a huge Michael Jordan fan (who wasn’t). Towards the end of MJ’s tenure with the Bulls we saw much of the same thing. The regular season was a struggle and a grind. The Bulls were a group of talented , yet aging veterans that looked at times like they were just treading water until the playoffs rolled around, when they did, the Bulls dominated. Fast forward to this years version of the Celtics, and I see much of the same. When this team is giving 100%, and they will in the playoffs, and if they can stay healthy, I don’t think anyone can touch them. I agree with all the aforementioned financial reasons to trade Ray, but if you remove is jump shot from that offense, Rondo will not be nearly as effective at the point. This team has the perfect balance right now, and you play to win a championship this season. Oh yeah, does anyone remember the Bulls series just a few months ago? Without Ray, we may lose that series. Let his contract expire and dip into the one of the deepest free agent pools ever

by James G2 on Nov 24, 2009 12:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

They Haven't Failed-- But They Haven't Succeeded Either

Alll I’m doing is predicting future “failure” based on present performance. What else would you base your predictions on?

Suppose they win 54 games and make it to the EC finals, where they lose to the young, athletic Atlanta Hawks. Would you consider that to be success or failure?

Assuming the season goes that way, how would you assess their chances of winning a title in 2010-2011?

From 1989 through 1993 the Celtics won 52, 56, 51 and 48 games, yet never came close to the NBA finals. Would you view those seasons as successes or failures?

To me, you either win a title or you’ve failed,. especially when you have a payroll of over 85 million.

And when you can’t compete for a title, it’s time to rebuild, so you do not have to endure years like 1994-2007.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You're on fire today.

Only minor quibble I’d have with this is that once you’ve made the determination that you can’t win a championship in a given year, I’d qualify moves that are on the right path toward building a legit contender once again are not failures, in spite of not winning a championship. Like jettisoning aging overpaid players for someone who can possibly be a part of a championship future, or even be a more marketable trading chip toward that end are both moves in the right direction and not failures. Other than that, I agree. Either you are on the path toward a championship, or on the path further away from one. Regardless of the record in 89-93, they were on the way away from one.

by Mencius on Nov 24, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree with championship or bust mentality

But how can you predict the future based on such a small sample size? I don’t think we’ve seen enough yet to make conclusions like that.

Follow me @jimmy_toscano

by Jimmy Toscano on Nov 24, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wallace, Williams, and Daniels....

Have never played for either Thibs or Rivers.

Did anybody expect 82-0? These three key additions are learning Thib’s defense, Rivers’ whatevers, and their roles. Garnett still looks like he’s getting in basketball shape. Davis has been out. With all of this, the team is on pace to win 57 games.

by Finkelskyhook on Nov 24, 2009 1:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

they may not have played for them

but they aren’t the main issue. Williams and Daniels have been terrific. Sheed not so much but the starters, other than Perk, are showing no energy or sense of urgency to win games. They’ve played for Doc/Thibs for the past 3 years so that’s not an excuse.

by slamtheking on Nov 24, 2009 1:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Number of Wins Is Irrelevant

Except for the first game of the season, they haven’t beaten a good team, and they’ve struggled to beat bad teams. They aren’t rebounding. They look old and slow, except for Rondo, who just looks confused. It’s embarrassing.

They aren’t beating any good team in the playoffs without MAJOR improvements. Even the first round will be a struggle, because they will be a #3 or #4 seed, not a top seed.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 1:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree with Brick 100 percent

At least in the fact that other than Cleveland, the Celts have really beaten no one this year and have struggled to beat bad teams. That said, I still think they have an outside chance to compete this year for the title, but they are a long shot at best.

by vinnie on Nov 24, 2009 7:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was slaughtered when I suggested Ray Allen was Best shooter of All time

Came to ask the Celtics Faithful,
If he isn’t, who is?

Thanks Guys

Keep pumpin, ain't worried bout nuttin
Busters thought we was frontin, so reload and keep dumpin
Keep Sleeping on Orlando...

by BS Patrol on Nov 24, 2009 1:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Not here but in a Modern Warfare 2 Lobby

Didn’t want any confusion, I come in PEACE!!

Keep pumpin, ain't worried bout nuttin
Busters thought we was frontin, so reload and keep dumpin
Keep Sleeping on Orlando...

by BS Patrol on Nov 24, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

right about what?

He’s calling the season based on 14 games? He’s offering opinions – there is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ when it comes to offering opinions on what MIGHT happen in the future.

Pathetic. I’m not saying the best thing won’t be to trade our chips (Ray & whomever) and punt for the future – but we’ve got a lot of basketball to be played before Danny has to make that decision.

At the end of the season, if they don’t win a championship, the pessimists who stake their ground now will be able to retreat into the comfort of “See, I told you so!”. If the C’s do win the championship the same pessimists will dismiss their doomsday prognostications with smiles, saying “Well, they really turned it around, didn’t they! Isn’t that swell?!!!”

Realism schmealism.

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I`ve seen enough already...

We`re nearly 20% into the season.

Teams that look like this in November…simply do not drink champagne in June!

by Title 18 on Nov 24, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

by the number of posts I just now read even if he is right

he hasn’t been busy except here LOL

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Nov 24, 2009 5:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not ready to concede the season...

But I’d be evaluating moves to make if things don’t straighten out soon.

If they were taking the Popovich approach, what is happening would be of less concern. But this team and coach started off with some big statements, and they have stumbled out of the gate…record notwithstanding.

More important, they do look uninspired and slow – except for Rondo and Pierce, and they can’t do it alone. Ray is in great shape and has been overlooked. But it’s not about the individual parts at this point.

It’s about the chemistry and energy. If they don’t get that straightened out over the next month, it’s time to start looking at moves of some of the individual parts.

Ironically, it’s been largely the starters that are having problems.

by tenaciousT on Nov 24, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Trading Ray????? Why??...sorry a Dose of Reality please!!!

Why would we trade Ray?? I know he has the expiring contract, and Paul Pierce is a Celtic no matter what, and KG is not a tradeable option, I understand. But from a basketball standpoint, the reason a lot of times Rondo has room to drive the lanes, the reason Paul Pierce isn’t drawing double teams in the mid-post or when operates off the top of the key, is because of #20. Ray’s being a 3pt threat, does so much for the way the offense operates.

Think about how many screens are set away from the ball for ray, extended to the 3 pt line. If we were to trade for RIp Hamilton for example, we could run virtually the same plays, but the screens would have to be set closer to the basket, and it will close the driving lanes, because Rip is a mid-range scorer, whereas Ray is long-range and mid-range.

But most importantly, I keep reading, “trade Ray and get a younger budding star on the rise”……..That makes a lot of sense, but lets be realistic…WHAT GM IN THE LEAGUE WOULD GIVE UP THEIR YOUNG RISING STAR FOR AN AGING (but still effective) RAY ALLEN?? I think its important to take the other perspective when you talk about trading people. Isaiah Thomas is no longer a GM, and so I doubt there are any GM’s who want to keep their jobs, would trade their younger future star, for Ray Allen, it doesn’t make sense, from the other perspective.

Sorry, to destroy everyone’s dreams and wishes, and ignoring your one-tracked minds, but a dose of reality is needed, in this discussion.

It’s equivalent to us trading Rondo (closest thing we have to a young rising star). Trading Rondo for Peja Stojakovic……..(not to say Peja is as good as Ray, cuz he’s not, but its the principle, and he’s the closest player in comparison to Ray, as far as an aging shooter and former all-star)

by fanofgreen on Nov 24, 2009 2:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No One Expects a Young Star on the Rise

What you can expect is two younger but expensive players, or else a decent pick.

So, shall we just wring our hands and slide into mediocrity, as the Celtics did after 1988?

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 3:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No.

If it makes sense as the trade deadline looms, Danny should make the best move possible either to shore up this season’s chances (not likely because the would require replacing Ray with equal value in a single player) or the future’s chances.

But my problem is with your assessment above that the season’s already at that point. That’s silly. That’s like assuming the Jets were for real after week two of this NFL season. You try above to portray yourself as ‘more realistic’. You have no more statistical weight behind your pessimism than an optimist does – there are only 14 games of 82 in the books.

A ton can and will change before this season is over.

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His trade VALUE is minimal

If we’re giving up on him, we’re giving up on a title this year. Which I don’t think anyone in the Celts organization is willing to do. Because, if they do float Ray out there, his value goes down. We will get back matching money but not matching value if you look at “value” as salary flexibility going into next year.

Much better to go down shooting for a title with Ray and then dropping 20 million off the books, than taking damaged or over-priced goods from someone else.

One thing that ought to be clear now is that Ray is looking at maybe $5 mil per year next year, not the ridiculous combinations (years and money) thrown out on this blog a month ago.

by Wildblu1 on Nov 24, 2009 3:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Giving Up on a Title

Well, the Ray has been playing, there will be no title if we keep him, either. He’s playing poorly at both ends. Maybe he’s hurt, and if that’s the case, Rivers should give him a few games off and see what Lester Hudson can do at the sg position.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 5:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I sometimes agree with you

but not this time……you need some decaf and “a few games off” – you and I have apparently been watching the Celtics a long time (me since 1967-68) but my goodness you seem to be panicked a bit early ……..breathe deep and remember patience is the companion to wisdom

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Nov 24, 2009 5:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL... nice

but not this time……you need some decaf and "a few games off"

by Mencius on Nov 24, 2009 6:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just how bad is Ray playing?

Compared to his career averages, he is down just slightly in minutes played (35.2 vs 37.2/game), shooting slightly better overall (FG%=.467 vs .448) and committing slightly fewer turnovers (1.9 vs 2.3) with about the same number of steals (1.1 v 1.2). He is down in the number of shots (12.1 v 16.2 – but not significantly since he became a Celtic (13.4) and his points are correspondingly down (15.0 v 20.8 career or about 17.8 as a Celtic). Since he joined the Celtics he does not need to take so many shots (notably his FG% as a Celtic is a little better than his career FG%).

The biggest drop in Ray’s game is really just in the 3pt shot department. His 3P attempts (4.0 v 6.1) and percentage (.304 v .397) are both way down. And that is probably single-handedly dragging down Ray’s PER, TS% and eFG% stats which are all below his career numbers. But that’s based only 56 3PA total! Hardly a statistically significant sample. He could easily go 4 for 6 from beyond the arc in a couple of games and those stats will all shoot up. Because the number totals are all too small to judge right now.

Brick – you need to step back and relax and let the season unfold a little bit more.

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 6:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Nobody is "blaming" Ray...

Fact is, had KG came back playing exactly like he did 2 years ago, the situation would be totally different. The team would be winning, and looking good while doing so.

But, KG is now a mere “shell” of what he was. Not a good sign when it`s your inspirational leader, and primary man in the paint. The chances of him being appreciably better in April are extremely slim.

Something has to be done! Anyone who thinks this current team has a “championship look” is delusional.

Friday, they lost a “statement” game…at home…with the opponent shooting a horrible 41% from the floor…57% from the FT line…and with Jameer Nelson in street clothes!

Sunday, they huffed & puffed to beat a pathetic NY team in OT!

How much more evidence does one need in order to see that this team simply does NOT have what it takes to win a championship????

In hopes of turning this ship around….Ray`s age and salary cannot be ignored.

   

by Title 18 on Nov 24, 2009 6:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

how much evidence do I need????

more than 14 games…..you may be clairvoyant ….I am not

Title 18 – Happy Thanksgiving

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Nov 24, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was responding to

the specific line from Brick’s post:

Well, the [way] Ray has been playing,there will be no title …

Sounds like blame to me.

Regarding KG’s injury – I agree that in large part, that KG’s early season performance is largely responsible for, shall we say …. a “lack of dominance” by the Celtics. But I would also preach patience with KG’s leg. I had a very similar type of knee injury in my mid-late 20s. After the surgery, it took me months (almost a year) to regain the strength and flexibility in the leg that was lost by just a couple of weeks in the cast. The core injury was healed almost immediately based on the surgical fix. But it took a long time to rebuild the strength lost in the process of fixing the original problem. KG looks to be around 60-75% back in leg strength based on what I’m seeing – and that fits about right for when he had the surgery to now. He’ll probably be back near full strength by Spring. In the mean time they have to keep him from straining his muscles and suffering a different injury.

Assuming the team avoids any other major injury, and KG continues to make steady progress back, then this team should get stronger as the season progresses not only through KG but also through the return of BBD and potentially through trading of some of their expiring contracts, whether it be Ray or TA, Scal or Giddens.

So there is reason to be cautiously optimistic.

And happy Turkey Day to everyone!

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 6:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He's Not Alone

Ray is by no meas the only culprit. But he’s the oldest of the big 3 and he’s the one with an expiring deal.

It may well be that Ainge cannot find a deal for Ray that makes sense. If that is the case, you let his deal expire and see what you can do over the Summer.

But IMHO, Ray’s days as a 40 minute player are over.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 7:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Over reaction at it's finest

Look, I’m a Lakers fans, and there’s nothing I would like more than to see the C’s fall flat on their face in the playoffs, but it’s not going to happen.

The C’s and Magic are by far the class of the east. KG is still recovering from his injury and he’ll probably look more like the old KG by the all-star break. You guys also get Big Baby back soon to help with the rotation (less huffing and puffing with more bodies to move in and out of the game)

The Knicks teams although supremely under matched by the C’s, play a style of basketball that is the total opposite of the C’s. They run and gun, it’s a style that’s great in the regular season (with the right personal) but it never pays off in the playoffs when the game slows down. Against an aging team, with a shorter rotation, I’m not surprised the Knicks had some success against the C’s, but ultimately the C’s are a championship caliber team, and they found a way to win.

Every elite team has had their woes this year, LAL was blown out by DAL & DEN, CLE hasn’t looked like world beaters this season, and ORL was blown out by OKC.

Bottom line is the season is a marathon not a sprint, when the dust settles the C’s will definately be in the title contending mix. It’s no time to panic. Just relax and enjoy the season.

by skewed1 on Nov 24, 2009 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Atlanta

If you are a Laker fan, you should fear Atlanta most of all. That is a team just coming into its own with probably the best chance of beating the Lakers in the finals.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 7:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ATL can't hang with LAL

I guess you missed you missed the LAL stomping of the ATL in LA without Pau

by skewed1 on Nov 24, 2009 7:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ATL is a nice young team, they may even replace CLE as the 3rd team in the east to beat, but they are built to beat teams in the east BOS, CLE, ORL, WAS, CHI, etc. I don’t see them winning a 7 game series against LAL, DEN or SAS.

by skewed1 on Nov 24, 2009 7:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Atlanta doesn't have the size

Horford isn’t stopping Bynum or Gasol (although that’s certainly not a knock at Horford, who has been terrific playing out of position), and Atlanta can’t capitalize on the Lakers’ most prominent defensive weakness in speedy point guards because Bibby has regressed to being a jump-shooter this stage in his career. Artest shut down Johnson fairly handily earlier this season, and Williams isn’t going to consistently cover Kobe in a seven game series.

That said, Atlanta has a pretty solid chance of knocking off Boston, Cleveland, or Orlando in a seven game series if they continue at their current pace, as they have the pieces to play all three.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Nov 25, 2009 4:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Defense

None of those statistics reflect the fact that he’s been a step slow on defense. In fairness to Ray, he’s not the only one.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 7:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

defense

is measured by points surrendered.

The Celtics at 89.6 pts/g are currently ranked #3 in the NBA at pts surrendered, just a hair behind Portland and Charlotte. So clearly AS A TEAM, the Celtics are doing a great job on defense.

Ray is second on the team in minutes at 35.2 min/g (Pierce is first at 35.4).

Soooo …. he’s on the floor more than all but one of his teammates on one of the best defensive teams in the NBA.

And he’s a step slow on defense? And he’s not the only one?

So SOMEBODY on the team must be playing defense with the HAND OF FREAKIN’ GOD in order for them to be playing this well as a team, considering Ray and some unnamed others are playing ‘a step slow on defense’ yet clearly taking up a big chunk of minutes on the floor.

Brick – can you back up what you say with anything empirical?

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ray isn't going anywhere

I haven’t read through all the post so I don’t know if it’s been mentioned but, Ray, Pierce, and KG have way to much chemistry together for Danny the even consider breaking them up. There are only a few players that could replace Ray, while maintaining team chemistry, and buying into and accepting the defensive identity of the C’s. I personally believe that the Ray trade talks pre-season where a little over dramatic, Danny may have given a trade a shot before the season started if the right deal was available (eg. Ray for Rip & Prince) but, I don’t think he does it mid-season.

Sometimes ppl get too caught up in the here and now, without focusing on the big picture for the C’s. It’s championship or bust for the team. No one will ever remember what happened in Nov. in 2015 if the C’s make it to the Finals and win.

As a Laker fan I fear the C’s coming out of the East especially if you guys have home court, (It would be an ultra series) but if you guys move Ray, I think it eliminates the C’s as a real threat to come out of the East.

by skewed1 on Nov 24, 2009 6:42 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Let's trade everyone except TA!

opppps my bad it’s too early in the season to trade anyone what i belive would be nice is that if doc can manage his substitutions much better if any or all of the big three plays poorly in a game then bench him and let your bench players step up, what’s the use of a deep bench if you’re not gonna maximize them whoever plays well that night gets his minutes if he is in a slump then don’t force the issue there is enough room to sit on the bench.

by jeric on Nov 24, 2009 7:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I dont like it, but value is value.

If we could work with a team like SacTown and we send over TA and RayRay for Martin and Nicioni.

by Celticnation on Nov 24, 2009 7:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This isn't fantasy

One aspect of all trade discussions that seems to get discarded, is something vital to winning basketball, team chemistry. I realize some of the Ray talk has an eye on the future, but if Danny at all believes it is possible to win this year, he is just not going to do it. The right fit of players is crucial to a winning formula. They just spoke on Comcast tonight in fact about how Ray has had to adjust the most, not have plays run for him etc. and this is his 3rd year with the team!

How would that process go for whomever else they brought in, especially not a full season? People are so enamored of this guy or that guy because of either the stats they put up or their individual game. Ray is a class act, has proven unselfish, has tried to fit in with the other stars, and it is still a work in progress.. Who’s to say anyone else brought in would be able to replicate fitting in with KG, Pierce and the rest? The mix is just as important, if not more, than the collection of individuals. Trading Ray this year, would be tantamount to saying the Celtics are not trying to win it all this year.

by KJ33 on Nov 24, 2009 7:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

trade ray ray ??

this team is aging but this team is championship quality win another title then think about the future. the future is now to win another title and besides what player are you going to trade him for to help us win now …

by lohaus#54 on Nov 24, 2009 7:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Kevin McHale

was a great player in 1990, even with his feet held together with pins and bailing wire. But they still should have traded him.

If you want to dig a hole in the sand and stick your head into it, be my guest.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 7:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

just because we aren't running around screaming that the sky is falling

doesn’t mean we have our heads in the sand.

Ray is not Kevin McHale and doesn’t have pins holding his feet together.

Yes there are issues of concern. There are also reasons to be optimistic. But its too early to call the season either way.

by mmmmm on Nov 24, 2009 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You can’t compare a hobbled McHale to Ray Allen right now. That’s just apples and oranges.

We’ve got a veteran team and it’s November, ya’ll didn’t expect them to run the table right?

Truth be told, we’d be better off letting him expire, re-sign him cheaply, and add another piece with the extra cap space. Like Elrod wrote on realgm, as Rondo comes into his own, this team will continue to contend with the current starting lineup. His youth balances the aging Big 3, I really think RR is that good.

by D Dub on Nov 24, 2009 7:52 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I’d say let good things cometo those whowait. keep the team together this yr. just trade bs, ta, and jrg.

by vgarcia890 on Nov 24, 2009 7:59 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

No Championship

So keep them together. Just don’t expect to win a championship. In fact, I wouldn’t be counting on a finals appearance.

I’m just hoping they can eke out a win against the Sixers tomorrow.

by Brickowski on Nov 24, 2009 8:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It’s too early to be pessimistic. they still have a good chance to prove u wrong. still early in season. we haven’t even given this team that chance. Kg is healthy this yr. make the rebuilding decision next year.

by vgarcia890 on Nov 24, 2009 8:37 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Brickowski, go to bed!

We’re all nervous about Ray and KG and Rondo’s free throws and Rasheed’s brick throwing, but they still have the best combination of starters, bench, coaching, home court crowd of any team in the league. You’re beginning to sound like Hanzinho but I know you are a lot older.

by Wildblu1 on Nov 24, 2009 9:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

don't trade ray allen

don’t try to trade ray allen to anyone..keep him for the benefit of celtics.. why not just try kevin garnett as the center of the team and rasheed wallace as the power forward of the team because garnett is much faster in terms of speed and quickness compared to rasheed..keep ray allen and keep rondo training for more perimeter shooting..paul pierce is doing good as of now..goodluck!

by lhytspd_ on Nov 24, 2009 11:52 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

don't give up

the team may just having trouble with their team chemistry..but don’t worry, the season is just starting..there is still hope..BOSTON CELTICS, 2009-2010 NBA SEASON CHAMPIONS!

by lhytspd_ on Nov 24, 2009 11:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Don't trade Ray.

Boston Celtics is Champions of 2008. Because there was Ray Allen who is one of Big 3.

by Temuulen O on Nov 25, 2009 7:34 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

190518335osmpfk_ph_1__small
Ray Allen for Jason Richardson?
Garnett300x300_080221_small
Are you guys serious about Kevin Martin? (FG%:0.384!!!)
Pats_locker_room_small
Tanguay Admits To Goof!
Small
Time to move Sheed
Rondooo_small
Rondoooo
Davis_davisb_spts_small
If Not now, WHEN?!?!
Small
what a bunch of looooooooosers!!!!
Small
The leash is off Doc
Small
Coaching sucks
Small
looking ahead

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small indeedproceed

300h_small Wide Load

Authors

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Small tenaciousT

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Celtics_shirt_small Greg Payne

Small Fafnir