Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Odds On Peyton Manning's Next Home Includes Three Teams

Living by the Three and Dying by the Three

Through the first six games of the season, the Celtics shot 57-126 from deep, good for 45.2 percent. The team reached something of a peak with their three-point shooting on Tuesday against the Philadelphia 76ers when the guys knocked down 14 of their 20 attempts in the midst of a 31-point blowout.

However, the following night against the Minnesota Timberwolves, the Celtics' red hot shooting from deep grew as cold as the Minneapolis weather in the heart of winter. The Celtics made just five of their 19 three-point field goal attempts against the Wolves and barely managed to squeak by Al Jefferson and company, with a 92-20 victory.

Two days later against the offensive-minded Phoenix Suns, the game plan called for the ball to be pounded down low against the likes of Amare Stoudemire and Channing Frye. The Celtics ended up losing 110-103, but 60 of those 103 points were scored in the paint. Clearly, scoring in the paint was possible against the Suns. Unfortunately, Boston apparently forgot about this strategy in the game's final three minutes and they resorted to bombing away from deep, which played a key role in the team's first loss off the season.

Star-divide

The Celtics managed to top Wednesday's dreadful performance from three-point land, as they shot a truly feeble 4-18 (22.2 percent) from deep on Friday. To make matters worse, the Suns were draining three-pointers left and right and finished the game on 13-24 shooting from three-point land, good for 54.2 percent. Jason Richardson (6-7 on threes) and Steve Nash (3-6 on threes) in particular provided the crushing blows that sank the Celts.

But at what point should the C's have recognized the three-ball just wasn't dropping and continued to pound it in down low, particularly to Kevin Garnett, who was in the middle of scoring a season-high 26 points? It's very difficult to gauge when to scrap the three-point shot, especially when facing a deficit, but Doc Rivers apparently wishes they had stuck with the original game plan.

"Going into the game, the game plan was to go to the post (and) drive the basketball," said Rivers. "I thought we did that for a while and then we got away from it. The game turned into more of (the Suns') pace and their way.

"The only thing I didn't like (was) I thought with three and a half minutes left, instead of searching for wide open twos that we had, we went into three mode and I didn't think we had to do that. I thought several times we could have easily got to the basket for a quick two and we passed up twos to look for threes and that to me was uncharacteristic of us."

The Celtics are easily one of the best three-point shooting teams in the league and are even better at defending the three, with the exception of last night. Coming into last night's game against the Suns, opponents were shooting just 24.7 percent from three-point nation against the Celtics.

No one should want the Celtics to stop shooting threes, but I think based on last night's loss, the team can do a much better job of recognizing situations and matchups and if they can exploit an opposing defense inside, they should make that their first scoring priority. I wouldn't be surprised to see this topic be emphasized at Monday's practice and even after that I don't fully expect the Celtics' three-point attempts to drop all that much. The Suns game just proved that when the threes aren't falling and there's an easier scoring method available, the Celtics should utilize that option first.

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This sums up why they lost that night

They should have worked the ball inside more at the end. they were very close to winning

by vgarcia890 on Nov 7, 2009 9:43 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

54% from 3 land = low chance of winning

They didnt lose in the last 3 minutes, they just didnt overtake at the end. You might say the Celtics did emphasise the inside game with 60 pts in the paint. Trouble is, that never got them the lead. They lost mainly because they didnt defend the three: partly from fatigue, partly from the way the Suns spread the floor, partly from Suns just gettiing hot.

by dCoye on Nov 7, 2009 11:25 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi