Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Robert Griffin III On NFL Combine: 'This Is A Business Trip'

Glen Davis is Already Making the Most of His Minutes

Just because Glen Davis was listed as 'active' when the Celtics squared off against the Orlando Magic in Florida on Christmas Day didn't guarantee he'd actually find his way onto the court. As it turned out, Kendrick Perkins and Kevin Garnett collected a few quick fouls and Doc Rivers found himself calling Davis' number. Glen played a grand total of 3:47 and collected three rebounds. Good enough. I expected next to nothing and Glen contributed three extra rebounds. Not bad.

But so began the process of integrating Glen back into the stream of things. His presence is welcome, simply because he adds more talent and depth to an already potent roster. Sometimes the transition for a player returning from a significant injury takes a somewhat lengthy amount of time. Sometimes it takes a handful of games before we realize that player is making any sort of impact whatsoever. But Davis didn't waste any time in his first stint of double-digit minutes of the season last night.

Sure, that loss to the Clippers might still sting for a number of reasons, but I was thoroughly impressed with Davis' overall performance. What was most comforting was how he basically looked like he had been playing all season. Throughout the 15 minutes he played his conditioning didn't appear to limit him, he made nice rotations on the defensive end and coupled that with some solid one-on-one defense, and he didn't appear to paralyze the offense at any point by being out of position.

Star-divide

Glen Davis did many of the little things last night and found a great deal of success because of it. His stats aren't overwhelming, but they were potent enough to have a clear impact on the game:

8 points, 6 rebounds (5 offensive rebounds), 1 assist, 1 steal, 1 block, 3-4 shooting (2-2 from the free throw line)

Again, not overwhelming, but quite impressive for just his second game back and his first game with 10+ minutes of play. I was personally excited about the offensive rebounds, particularly the ones that he brought down and went right back up for easy put backs. One of these happened with 7:31 left in the second quarter and it gave Boston a 36-28 lead at the time, and another came with 10:26 left in the fourth, which gave Boston a 77-74 lead. Even more impressive was the fact that they came against Chris Kaman, a walking double-double and a guy who finished last night's game with 27 points and 12 rebounds. But besides putting the rebounds back up for points, Davis also showed intelligence and patience on a few of them, and elected to kick the ball back out so the C's could reset the offense.

While last night was a nice step for Glen, his next move should be to aim for consistency in small doses. It's unlikely he'll make a major leap over the next two or three games and suddenly be the Glen Davis of last season, but if he can take the minutes Doc gives him and provide energy and the intangibles, then he can still fill a valuable role for this team while he works his way back.

Not lost in the aftermath of Davis' solid performance last night is the fact that Shelden Williams didn't play at all. Shelden tallied just over six minutes against Orlando on Friday, but that could have been due more to the fact that Rasheed Wallace guards Dwight Howard quite well and Doc felt more inclined to keep Wallace on the floor.

But last night, with no guarantees Davis would perform well, Doc chose him over Williams. I only mention this because, again, it would have only been Davis' second game back against a Clippers team that came in averaging 11.3 offensive rebounds per game, meaning Williams' rebounding capabilities might have been valued.

With Davis returning does this mean Williams' minutes will take a hit? That remains to be seen and it's far too early into Davis' return to make a call on that. We'll probably need at least another 5-10 games to make a fair analysis on that front, but Doc always managed to find ways of splitting the minutes between Davis and Leon Powe when Powe was in town. We'll have to see if a similar strategy will be applied in this scenario.

In the meantime, let's just be glad that Davis has yet to show any true signs of rust. His performance last night was impressive. Now let's see if he can find the consistency as he works his way back.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from CelticsBlog

JaJuan Johnson is Coachable

Feb 2012 by Jeff Clark - 14 comments

Boston Celtics Daily Links  2/4

Feb 2012 by FLCeltsFan - 2 comments

Comments

Display:

Agreed

BBD’s defensive rotations looked pretty good. On two straight possessions, he got in front of penetration. Block on the first, charge on the next. Asking Shelden to do that? I don’t know. He’s probably not there yet, and who knows if he WILL be.

Good to see Glen back.

by bagofbeef on Dec 28, 2009 11:29 AM EST reply actions  

glen davis

With bigs of Perkins Garnett Wallace Davis Williams and Scalabrine
and littles of Pierce RAllen Rondo TAllen Daniels and House
Danny has done a great job. Davis adds a lot underneath,
although he is itching to use his outside shot.
With the return of Pierce and Daniels, it will be even more fun.
The kids of Walker, Hudson, and Giddens will be in and out of
Portland all year. Scal and Williams will see few minutes.

by old_fan on Dec 28, 2009 11:31 AM EST reply actions  

it was good to see baby hustling and being rewarded for it. taking the charge was admirable. the loss to the clips did not bother me too much. they did not play great defense. it was good to see rondo put into a clutch free throw situation. he didnot deliver but it was good that he was there. i do want to see sheldon being utilized. too much scal and the clip game would have been the right spot for walker.

by nazzbo on Dec 28, 2009 11:34 AM EST reply actions  

"they did not play great defense."

Giving up 93 pts to the Clippers isn’t a great showing by the defense, but it isn’t terrible.

I sort of think it was more the offense that failed in this one. I felt like the Celtics couldn’t buy a shot in the last few minutes – the offense just couldn’t sink one to save their lives – including Sheed missing the dunk. A lot of that is just bad luck – sometimes good shots miss and bad shots fall in. Some of it was bad shot choices.

by mmmmm on Dec 28, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I know the docs have cleared Baby to play but...

I find myself worrying that it wouldn’t take much of a smack to screw up Baby’s thumb again. I realize his return was basically on the anticipated schedule, but for some reason his return seems a little early. I guess this is coming from having broken many of my fingers playing basketball.

Anyway, as to his play, I’m pleasantly surprised. Looks really good for having been out so long. Seems way more fluid than Williams already. Williams himself was a pleasant surprise too, but seems to have stone hands and is way more mechanical than Baby.

Anyway, glad to have Baby back. When Quis comes back and rounds into form and we have our full compliment, we’ll have a heckuva bench, though I’d still prefer if Danny would bring on a real backup PG. Oh, and props to TA. He’s at least been the equal of Daniels in my eyes thus far. Truth be told, to me, he’s seemed better than Daniels, which I’m surprised to say, since I count myself among those who had basically given up on TA.

by Mencius on Dec 28, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

TA and Marquis are different

Marquis is a much better/smarter ball handler than TA. TA is a more aggressive defender than Marquis. They are both good slashers, though I like Tony better there. TA, Marquis, and Eddie could be interesting together, though a little small (esp if playing with BBD)

by Silverlock on Dec 28, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I have not always been a Glen Davis' cheerleader

but if he keeps contributing like this I will have to buy some new pom poms.

I have, however, been looking forward to his return and am very glad that he is playing even better so far than I had hoped. Keep it up, Baby.

by thirstyboots18 on Dec 28, 2009 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

Agree

The biggest thing that I saw was that he looks lighter and seems to be much quicker than last year. I saw him out on front of the fast break 2 or 3 times and he was motoring. He didn’t get the ball, but I’ll bet not too many defenders will step in with him at full steam!

On defense he seemed to rotate very well and again quicker. The charge he took and some of his rotations.

Maybe I’m seeing things. Anyone else see that?!

by badax33 on Dec 28, 2009 6:40 PM EST up reply actions  

he made some nice plays

on both sides of the ball and took it slow.
Doc has to be careful.

When OH When will Doc please just keep Scalabrine on the bench and play
our talented youth instead ???
Scal is getting burned all around. He doesn’t belong out there.
He is not NBA material.

by Snowball on Dec 28, 2009 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

Compared to Walker, Giddens, and at this point even Hudson...

Scal is absolutely NBA material. That’s why Scal will get minutes over them.

by Tai on Dec 28, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Scal plays because he is a heady player...

But heady only gets you so far, and i believe air intangibles is in steady decline..

Take the clips box score

Scal 10 mins 0 pts 0 fg 0 fga 0 rb 1 ast 1 blk 2 fouls

Baby 15 mins 8 pts 3-4 fgs 6 rbs 1 ast 1 stl 1 blk 3 fouls

If scal is played because of his defensive rotations and ability to space the floor, i say give baby his minutes with a big lineup. He can provide that. Or allow some time for some of our young guys who HAVE been producing to develop.

I’ve always appreciated what scal does that isnt in the box score, but with this teams depth, you gotta have more than intangibles. This team doesnt just need someone to fill minutes without hurting the team each game, they have enough depth they can fill in with players that can actually produce.

by cordialb on Dec 28, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I've always defended Scal

but with BBD back and healthy – I’d prefer to give him most of those minutes that Scal has been getting.

by mmmmm on Dec 28, 2009 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, but not yet

I agree that I’d rather see BBD than Scal, but he’s not ready for prime time yet. Give him 3-4 weeks.

However, I don’t see BBD playing SF, which is what Scal was playing last nite. The other choices were Giddens and Walker and apparently Doc isn’t comfortable with either at this point. I think Giddens will be in Europe or some other league next year, he’s not ready for the NBA. I like Walker but with the injuries he’s had, he may be out of the NBA next year as well. I hope I’m wrong, but that’s the way I see it.

by badax33 on Dec 28, 2009 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Sheed couldn't make a basket last night

Did you see Sheed last night ? The man is not even attempting to penetrate.
He’s taking 3 pointers far from the line without even seeking a closer launching point.
Fact I had to see at least 4-5 missed tosses by Sheed
i think he’s the reason they lost last night.

Tai, I couldn’t disagree with you more. Anyone on the bench is better than BS.

by Snowball on Dec 28, 2009 12:35 PM EST reply actions  

Sheed couldn't hit, but distance wasn't the only reason

He missed a dunk. He took lots of non-threes. The threes he took were wide open. Early in the season he was driving me crazy by never going to the basket. I would still like to see more inside work, but last night was simply a bad shooting night

by Silverlock on Dec 28, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, Sheed took 10 shots inside the line vs 6 outside

unfortunately, only made 4 of the former to go with none of the latter.

A bad shooting night.

And the C’s did a poor job of feeding Ray Allen – he should be taking way more than 12 shots with Pierce out of the lineup.

by mmmmm on Dec 28, 2009 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

You really would take Giddens over Scal?

I’m glad you’re not on my team’s coaching staff.

by Tai on Dec 28, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Did anyone else notice BBD elevation

Glen was getting up much higher than we have seen from him. Rebounding wasn’t historically a strong suit for him. This could be very interesting

by Silverlock on Dec 28, 2009 12:54 PM EST reply actions  

the word is that he's lost weight

that’ can’t hurt the vertical leap ….

hopefully it won’t mess with his ability to shove guys out of the way underneath! :-D

by mmmmm on Dec 28, 2009 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope we do not see

Williams minutes be drastically reduced with Glenn back as Williams has played well this year filling in and Doc can find time for both big men.

I would like to see the duo of Baby and Williams be used as enforcers off the bench to come in and use their 6 fouls and and muscle up opposing teams.

 Thats a aspect of our game that is missing, tough physical play which I think would be great for the C’s to start utilizing.

by fordescort on Dec 28, 2009 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

Great point fordescort....

It would be nice for the Celtics to start playing more physical ball.

They have the beef, depth and fouls up front with Perk, Rasheed, Baby and Williams to play such a way and should.

I think when the C’s play tough mean ball it brings out the best in them and intimidates opposing teams especially of defense.

by leothetiger on Dec 28, 2009 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Glad to see Big Baby back

But I, too, worry about that thumb maybe not being completely healed. He is too good of a player to take any chances with and I expect him to keep getting better and better every season, as long as he stays healthy. Was really impressed with him last night.
Baby, PROTECT that thumb please!!! We want you around fr a very long time.

by mmbaby on Dec 28, 2009 4:31 PM EST reply actions  

Perkins makes the same silly fouls as previous years...

I wish he would stop. I hope he and Rasheed get their mental game up to par. Missed shots are a part of the game. Control the mental and hustle part of your game..that’s all a fan could ask for. get it done!

by duval e on Dec 28, 2009 7:19 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Sanity Check II: Still About KG and Pierce
Small
Big 4 + One

Recent FanPosts

Small
Rondo's 2nd All-Star Appearance
Small
Charles Oakley calls KG & Perk "fake tough guys"
Images_small
What About This...
Small
trade with Utah
Small
Rajon Rondo Shooting Jumpers Is A Good Thing
Yowhasgoodggreen_small
We need to SHAKE things up....
Small
Draft
Small
Danny Please Make some moves! Ideas!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi