The Celtics' Offensive Options Are Limited Right Now
Defense had to be the Celtics' priority heading into last night's game against the Phoenix Suns, but unfortunately Steve Nash and co. broke through Boston's defensive barriers early and often. It didn't take long for the game to become a display of offensive wills, which was a battle the banged-up Celtics were bound to lose to the explosive Suns.
Keeping up with the Suns on the offensive side of the ball was really the only hope the Celtics had last night, seeing as they just didn't have the manpower to hold down the Suns for very long. Not only didn't they have enough bodies, but they didn't have the ideal bodies that help sure up the overall team defense.
Unfortunately, there were a few glaring holes in the Celtics' offense last night - some which were exclusive to last night's loss in Phoenix and some which have sprung up throughout this three-game losing streak and could remain until we see guys like Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett return to the lineup.
First, with two of the Big Three inactive for the time being, the onus falls on Ray Allen to put the ball in the basket more often. Once it was confirmed Garnett wasn't going to play last night, I was curious as to whether Doc Rivers might gear the team's offense towards Ray Allen and run play after play for him. I wouldn't have been totally surprised if by the end of the night Ray had at least 25-30 shot attempts. We might have felt like we had taken a trip back to his Milwaukee and Seattle days, but the Celtics needed a big night from Ray and they simply didn't get that.
Ray finished last night's game with 15 points, which is nothing to snuff that, but it was a very quiet 15-point outing. His points weren't necessarily making a huge impact on the overall game. His shots and his points weren't changing the overall flow and tone of the game in the Celtics' favor. Never did Phoenix's defense really need to react to Ray's offense last night. This is even more unfortunate considering Jason Richardson was shadowing Ray for most of the evening.
Ray shot just 4-13 in last night's game, and of the 14 games the Celtics have played so far in December, Ray has shot less than 50 percent from the field in 12 of them. There was some speculation coming into the season as to whether or not this was the year we'd start to see Ray decline and while I'm not overly concerned with that question right now, I'm slowly being convinced that Ray isn't completely capable of taking over a game and carrying a team all by himself anymore - not for a continuous stretch, at least. Teams in the NBA with just one stud scorer were never meant to find success, so Ray going off for 30+ doesn't even guarantee a win, but the C's certainly needed more production from him last night.
In the end, the Celtics employed an offensive strategy that incorporated all the players on the floor, with an emphasis on punching the ball down low. I feel like I'm beating a dead horse in regards to writing about Rasheed Wallace playing down low, but it was especially painful last night because the Celtics needed him to do it and the Suns are an ideal team to play in the paint against. The Celtics dropped 60 points in the paint when these two teams first met back on November 6 and last night the Suns were over rotating on almost every Boston possession, which helped account for many of the points Kendrick Perkins scored down low. Rasheed could have had a full-on field day down low last night, and while he found success at times, I can't help but feel like his overall production in the paint could have been much better.
Rajon Rondo did appear limited at times last night, particularly when it came time to explode past Steve Nash to the basket. He was visibly grimacing multiple times and he almost came out for good at the 5:44 mark of the third quarter before re-entering with 4:21 to go in that same period.
But with Pierce out of the lineup and Tony Allen replacing him, two of the Celtics' five starters cannot shoot jump shots. This is a problem. Sure, both will occasionally hit a jumper, but with both players' offensive games being fairly one-dimensional from a straight scoring standpoint, it's much easier for opposing defenses to sag off and help on other Celtics who find themselves in scoring position.
Danny Ainge alluded to the fact that Rondo's lack of a jump shot hindered the Celtics against the Magic in last season's playoffs because the Magic basically ignored Rondo when the Celtics had the ball and chose to double the likes of Ray Allen and Paul Pierce. Well, having just one player create that effect for your team is bad enough, but now we have to worry about two players potentially creating this effect? And they'll both be on the court together most of the time until Pierce returns? Ugh.
If you look at the top tier points guards in the NBA right now, your list will probably include Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Derron Williams and Rajon Rondo. What's the one glaring difference between Rondo and those other three players? A jump shot. Rajon can defend as well as, if not better than those other three, he can rebound better than all three of them and he can arguably pass as well as any of them. But for those other three, their ability to hit a jump shot takes them to a level slightly above Rondo at this juncture in all of their respective careers. Not only can Steve Nash knife through the lane and find Amare Stoudemire for an easy lay up, but he can hide behind a pick and bury a devastating jump shot or three-pointer. The same can be said for Paul and Williams, but not Rondo. Not yet.
Despite the issues, the Celtics still found ways to score last night. They posted 98 points and six guys scored in double figures, but after Phoenix built its double digit lead, all Boston managed to do was trade baskets for the rest of the game. Eddie House had one of his best games of the season (19 points, 5-7 from the nation), but it seemed like whenever he hit a three-pointer, the Celtics' deficit would only drop to somewhere between 10 and 14 points and then Phoenix would respond with a three-pointer of its own just seconds later. Boston was never really in a position last night to have Eddie's shots matter for a whole lot. His shots kept the C's in the "hanging around" stage, rather than the "seriously threatening" stage that the C's would have needed to make last night's game even remotely interesting in the final few minutes.
Unfortunately, this is the reality for the Celtics until they can get their heavy hitters back. The offense will just have to find ways to score, even if it means resorting to unconventional ways. Not to put more of a damper on anyone, but the Suns allow just over 106 points per game, so the C's scoring in garbage time last night fails to allude to the issues the offense is facing right now. The C's simply need to get through this difficult stretch, get their guys healthy and find their stride later on in the season. Until everyone gets back both the offense and defense could be pretty sketchy at times, but we're just going to have to suck it up and make do with what we've got.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
no heroes on celtics, just-----
real pathetic—non classy—nobody willing to step up to the plate and take up the slack—real losers!!!!!!!!!
no heroes on celtics -- yet
I wasn’t overjoyed or even satisfied last night, but even the team we did field last night wasn’t particularly healthy. Give these players some time to adjust to the new circumstances.
by Thruthelookingglass on Dec 31, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
I get that defense will suffer...
…But why not start Eddie House? Much better offensively than having TA in. Is the defensive difference big enough between TA and House that it justifies House not being in the starting line-up?
Also, as other people have said, I would like to see a bit of Hudson and Walker. Not that much walker, but come on, giving Scal a bulk of SF minutes against Phoenix is kind of ridiculous. Pace>intangibles, for now.
Ray isn’t really a primary option for offense any longer. He’s too inconsistant. This isn’t the Ray Allen of Milwaukee/Seattle days.
Any time we need to depend on Ray for major offense, we’ll be in trouble. The only player we have that can really deliver in the crunch is PP due to his varied offensive skills. He’s also the only one that if we needed someone to deliver a 25 or 30-pt performance every night for a playoff series could actually be relied upon to deliver.
Ray’s jumper is not there for him on too many nights and Garnett just doesn’t get the volume of shot attempts.
When the team is completely healthy, this isn’t a big deal since we have more people that can provide some points but when we’re down 4 people from the rotation, the offense has some glaring holes.
offense?
who cares about the offense suffering… it is INEXCUSABLE to have the defense suffer like it has..
yeah, I agree - it was the defense
The offense wasn’t really the problem. They demonstrated within the first 5-10 minutes that, yeah, they could go inside and score two points on the Suns anytime they needed. But they also demonstrated in those few minutes that they couldn’t stop the Suns at all, either inside for 2 or outside for 3. Once the Suns got out to their 10-ish point lead, the game was just trading baskets the rest of the way. The Suns couldn’t pull completely away, but the Celtics, without the abilty to create defensive stops, could not pull closer. The only chance the Celtics had would have been if suddenly their 3-pt game, which has been so flaky all year, suddenly came back to them.
But it didn’t. And each time they tried and missed a 3 it came back as a 2 for the Suns because they simply could not stop the Suns at all.
Lack of defensive stops – that’s what really killed them.
Pistons fan here...
How you guys likin’ big Sheed? =P I kid i kid. Not really. Good luck getting him into the paint without a serious shot of Benadryl.
by MaxiellEatsLittleOnes on Dec 31, 2009 2:21 PM EST reply actions
better now than later but who knows what lies in store for us later? ray is ok but he is not the greatest of ball handlers and neither is tony. with rondo hurting and unable to penetrate because of the hammy, we were doomed on offense. perk was slow with the ball and needs kg to set him up that leaves sheed as the culprit as he seemed reluctant to bang down low.
Gamma Flight
I agree with matthewmafa and mmmmm — the defense was straight-up lousy, except for a few brief flashes in the third quarter. But while it was a disgusting display, I can’t get on these guys too much. A lot of the lineups we saw last night were brand new, largely untested, and have probably not practiced together much in those configurations (and certainly not at the pace and level of focus that was required to compete against the Suns).
I DO, however, see a big plus here, in that this situation has forced Doc to go waaaay outside of his comfort zone (although Mr. Walker still seems to be relegated to the Dept. of Public Works), and the third unit (!) is being given a precious gift of real live NBA burn against serious teams. If the Celts can use this opportunity to strengthen the defense during this hard-knocks stretch, and IF all of our guys get and stay healthy, that could really be a plus in April.
What I do know is that it’s been a lot of ulcers following this team, but I wouldn’t give ’em up for the world.
Cmon fellas
Lets he real here for a moment. My team lost and your team lost against the Suns! Woopty freakin Doo!! The Sun couldnt hold a candle to the Lakers and the Celtics in a 7gm series. I could care less about losing a pointless game to a team that has no chance of winning the division..let alone going to the finals. All were playing for now is seeding. Its funny to watch teams win a bunch of games..BSPN proclaims them the team to beat then the playoffs come around and they crumble like the Cavs last year. I said it before and ill say it again. Lakers vs Boston 10’ Finals. Thats the way it should be. Doc Riverals aka The Players Coach vs Phil the Zen Jackson. The two most respectable franchises dueling once again for all the marbles..and personally i would be disappointed if it was any other way
by Kobe Won Kenobi on Dec 31, 2009 7:04 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I agree - play the young guys for experience, and somehow get to the Finals
Got to try to build value either for use or trades – Hudson is 50% from the arc vs 11% for Rondo, and Giddens/Walker are not lost causes…
BTW Greg,
“Rajon can defend as well as, if not better than those other three, he can rebound better than all three of them and he can arguably pass as well as any of them.”
Chris Paul is leading Rondo in rebounding by .6 rpg playing in a much stronger conference…
by nba is the worst on Jan 1, 2010 8:09 AM EST up reply actions
So it's basically a wash then
But of the Top 10 rebounders in the league, 6 of the 10 are from the Eastern Conference, so in terms of rebounding the conferences are probably more balanced than one might think. But if I need one point guard to get me a rebound, I’m taking Rondo. With Paul currently being up by only .6, if he has an off night on the boards and Rondo has an above average night, they’ll basically end up equal stat wise. That’ll probably go on the rest of the season, too.
Wanna score?
Play Lester Hudson instead of Scalabrine. Rivers’ love affair with Scalabrine has to stop.
JR, lester and billy need to develop so let’s play them. the phoenix game was a perfect game to play small ball. thier bigs are faster than ours so I would have sacrificed size for speed. At least that way someone would have been guarding channing frye. scal and rasheed are fat and out of shape. there’s no way to sugarcoat that. we need a scoring punch off the bench and it’s not eddie house.we need a guy who can generate his own shot and go one on one. other than pierce , tony allen and rondo we don’t have anyone who can beat their man. ray and eddie need about 10 picks to get open and even then they manage to screw it up.JR has a good 1st step and lester was a big time scorer in college. let’s see what they can do !!
Celtics offensive options limited???
I agree if you play Scalabrine 30 minutes a night. He gives you nothing but an occasional 3 pointer.
House can be effective, but only if the Celtics establish points on the block (Hello Sheed, I am talking to you).
Perkins has improved his scoring this year and is an option.
The Celtics have workaraound options available if they lose their primary weapons.
Hello, Hello! I don't know why you say good-bye, I say Hello!

by 























