CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

For Boston, The Party Starts After 3:00 PM

Dannybanners_medium

I've been predicting this for weeks, but it doesn't take Nostradamus to figure out what will happen here.  Ainge has admitted that he's trying to work something out, but nothing at all seems close.

From the Herald:

"We’ll be on the phone right up until the end, but we feel like we’ve exhausted most of the things we’ve been talking about."

From the Globe:

"Nothing, all quiet," Celtics president Danny Ainge said yesterday. "I'm not expecting anything. We've tried to do some deals, there is nothing that's worked that makes the math fit for teams. We're trying to do deals, we put some effort - nothing.

"I'm not even close to doing deals. There is nothing going on. I'll continue to talk over the next 24 hours. I'll talk with teams but nothing's there. It's an expiring contract, free agent situation - we don't have any of those."

So while things will most likely be quiet today, we all should be paying close attention to the deadline deals.  Once things cool down for the rest of the league, it could heat up for us pretty quickly.

Some factors in our favor today:

  • The Chandler trade being recinded means there's still a chance Joe Smith will be waived.  He apparently wants to be a Celtic, so that's great news.
  • The Knicks don't plan on using Marbury's expiring contract in a deal, so they will likley move on buying him out after the deadline.  He's also mentioned the Celtics several times.
  • Any trade that happens can create a roster imbalance.  2 for 1 or 3 for 2 deals might create a situation where a team has to cut someone to stay under the 15 man roster limit.
  • The finances of today's NBA mean that a lot of teams will be very motivated to buy out players, even if they are still productive (see Joe Smith).

I'm actually pretty optimistic that the Celtics can land both Marbury and Joe Smith.  I would imagine in that scenario that Patrick O'Bryant would be waived (the 2nd year on his contract is not guaranteed, so the cap hit would be minimal).

I had been hesitant to endorse the need for a point guard, but with Tony's injury there's less depth at the guard position and we traded away our "break glass" option.  So adding a scorer off the bench that can distribute the ball sounds like a good option to me.  The concerns are still there about his head and his ability to pick up the system (in particular on defense) but the risk seems minimal.  If he doesn't work out, we can cut ties any time we want.

I'm not sure what our plan B options are at this point, but it will all become clearer after 3:00 PM today.

0 recs  |  Comment 39 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I would still like us to trade a couple of guys away if possible. At least Giddens for a second rounder or something similar to open up a roster spot…

by thebirdman on Feb 19, 2009 8:26 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I’m glad you’re optimitic about Smith. I’ll keep my fingers crossed. I still can’t make up my mind if I’d like Marbury though.

by moiso on Feb 19, 2009 8:32 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

possibilities

If we can land Smith that would be sweet.

I’d rather bring back Sam than bring in Marbury if we’re picking up an experienced PG if for no other reason than Sam knows the system and isn’t a locker room cancer.

If Sam/Marbury come in, POB is the likely cut. Shame to give up on a young 7-footer so quickly but Smith could realistically produce as a back up for another 2 years.

by slamtheking on Feb 19, 2009 8:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Marbury & smith would give us a good shot in the arm.As far as Marbury being a cancer I think as a team the celtics are capable to make him productive at least through the playoffs….after that marbury could be sent to the moon.

by tommyfan on Feb 19, 2009 8:46 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I have little interest in Smith, and no interest whatsoever in Marbury. Neither one plays defense, and Smith, at 6-9, is not much taller than Powe or Davis. If you need a 7-footer, go after a 7-footer, e.g. Chris Mihm.

As for the guard position, I don’t see anyone out there better than Pruitt, and that includes Marbury, who never played defense in his life.

by Brickowski on Feb 19, 2009 9:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Lol.

God bless and good night!

by BrickJames on Feb 19, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Smith + Marbury = Banner 18

If we get Starbury, he will be motivated to play his best and be a model citizen, temporarily, so he can prove he’s still an elite player and thus score a big contract this offseason. Our second unit can only function as a platoon if we have a good slasher, which DA apparently was deluded that TA could be. Starbury has proven that he can do that.

You don’t have to like Starbury generally to conclude that he can fill one of our present needs for the rest of this season.

Mihm has hands of stone, and the durability of Pervis Ellison. Pass.

"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark

by Eeyore III on Feb 19, 2009 9:25 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

i would prefer smith but mihm is very nice if he’s available.

by nazzbo on Feb 19, 2009 9:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Mihm?

Give me a break. we’re better off without mihm..NO THANKS

Smith sounds good, and raja bell would be ideal(although thats very unlikely)

by TheAncientRivalry on Feb 19, 2009 10:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Mihm isn't a free agent

he was traded to Memphis for a future pick

I think he was just brought up as an example of what else you could get right now for cheap

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Feb 19, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I had been hesitant to endorse the need for a point guard, but with Tony’s injury there’s less depth at the guard position and we traded away our “break glass” option. So adding a scorer off the bench that can distribute the ball sounds like a good option to me.

Sounds like Gabe Pruitt to me. I’ve liked very much what i’ve seen from GP13 this season — with his main drawback being he still defers a bit. But he’s given most of what you want from a BACKUP pg…. solid ballhandling (2:1 asst/to), good D (1.3 stl/per36), spot shooting.

Adding a big or a wing for defensive purposes sounds great to me, but i’ve switched to the “eh, don’t want him” camp vis-a-vis Marbury.

Plus Sam Cassell may be walking through that door after all.

by Gainesville Celtic on Feb 19, 2009 10:15 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Gabe Pruitt?

UGH, please, hes not even trustworthy in meaningless regular season games…he will not and should not see the light of day in the playoffs

by TheAncientRivalry on Feb 19, 2009 10:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather keep Sam and get Marbury over keeping Pruitt myself, if it ever came to that.

by BudweiserCeltic on Feb 19, 2009 10:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like Pruitt

but Starbury has a lot more talent and can create scoring opportunities better than Gabe right now

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Feb 19, 2009 10:31 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Talent alone doesn’t win championships, and the assumption that Marbury— after sitting out the whole year— will suddenly become motivated to play the right way upon joining a new team is wildly optimistic. There is a reason why his teams have never won, and there is something to be said for a second unit that doesn’t allow 12-0 and 14-0 runs as it waives at opposing players on their way to the basket. Sure, Marbury can creat scoring opportunities— but mostly for himself.

As for Joe Smith, he is a 6-9 mid range jump shooter. That’s it. He’s not a good defender, and barely adequate as a rebounder at the pf position. He can’t play center. He is not, in my view, an upgrade over either Powe or Davis, both of whom have championship rings (while Smith does not).

Now Fabricio Oberto would be a different story. He’s gritty, tough, and has always played the right way. If he get waived, Ainge should be on the phone the very next second.

I aslo like the idea of trying to pry away young veterans with upside from teams that may be looking to dump salary. I’d be interested in guys like Thabo Sefolosha, Julian Wright, Renaldo Balkman and Antoine Wright. Each one of thiose guys would be a nice long wing defender off the bench, which IMHO is what they really need, not another big man or point guard.

by Brickowski on Feb 19, 2009 11:09 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Pruitt over Marbury; Leon/Baby over ???

I’d go that way. You want to have unprotected sex with a known HIV positive person? That’s Marbury to the Celtics.

And Brickowski is right on. Joe Smith is barely taller (if he is) than Leon or Baby and has been know nmost of his career as an underachiever. Also, as Brickowski has said in many posts, rotations get shorter in playoffs. Worrying about 10-12th man is dancing on head of a pin. There are no good long big men out there that are better than what we’ve got. Chris Mihm ! He gives you ten good minutes and two weeks in the trainers room.

Just round the team we’ve got into playoff temper and condition and we can play anybody. One caveat…if we could pry Bird Man Anderson from Denver that would be an active big man. He cost Denver less than $1 mil. That was a good signing and they probably wouldn’t give him up.

by Wildblu1 on Feb 19, 2009 11:17 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Smith is no 10-12th man.

by BudweiserCeltic on Feb 19, 2009 11:22 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Get Marbury, Smith

I think everyone has been forgetting just how much of a talent Marbury really is. If he was perfect, he wouldn’t be in the sorry situation he is in now.
But f he can’t get motivated to play “the right way” now, then the guy is literally the biggest bum in the history of sports.
I find it hard to believe he can’t play “the right way” for 3.5 months.
As for Smith, we should be worrying about depth, even if it is the 10-12th guy. One of the main reasons we were successful last year is because Danny left no stone unturned.

by Burke15 on Feb 19, 2009 11:23 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wing Defender

Assuming that TA may not be back soon, then need a taller version of him who can guard Kobe or LeBron in the secong and third quarters, so that Pierce or Ray Allen don’t have to do it. IMHO that’s the key to success in this year’s playoffs.

And don’t tell me that Posey filled that role last year. He did not do a good job on either of those players.

by Brickowski on Feb 19, 2009 11:23 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

my Ideal Scenario

Sign Joe Smith after buyout
Sign Marbury after buyout
Sign Mihm off Waivers
Somehow turn Pruitt, Walker, Powe into a legit wing defender
Resign Cassell

#18

God bless and good night!

by BrickJames on Feb 19, 2009 11:27 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

That is too many players on the roster.

You would also have to cut POB deactivate Tony for the rest of the season.

When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"

by Green17 on Feb 19, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No Baby & No Pruitt in Playoffs

Great posts so far. I’m not very familiar with Joe Smith, but if it means I don’t have to see BBD come in as a “backup center” anymore, then I’m for it. But there legitamitely should be a taller person available. I can’t stand watching Oberto (the flop master), but I’d agree with Brickowski that he would be a decent option.

However, I disagee with Brick on Pruitt. The second unit struggles greatly, and most particularly b/c we don’t have a PG who can pressure the opposing defense. This in turn takes House (and Allen if he’s in there) out of their game, and leads to rushed jumpers, turnovers, and forced shots by Leon & BBD, and others. Pruitt at this point does not have the skills, experience, or fortitude to provide what the Celtics need off the bench. It’s crazy to think that Pruitt would be more valuabe in the playoffs than a motivated Marbury.

by TomHamilton30 on Feb 19, 2009 11:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Who could we get to guard Lebron/Kobe/etc?

That was a great point brought up. And right now I’m drawing a bit of a blank. Pierce won’t play 48 minutes, and it’d be real nice to have a go-to-guy (that isn’t very TO prone) who could somewhat lock-down the star of the other team. Any ideas?

by TomHamilton30 on Feb 19, 2009 11:38 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Not sure

if anyone else mentioned this but both Smith and Marbury have played with KG and you have to believe KG would have to give his blessing meaning he could keep Marbury in line. We need another vet pg.

by The Real Large James 2 on Feb 19, 2009 12:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Joe Smith

Sure Joe Smith is an underachiever, below average rebounder and not a center, but he does hit his midrange jump shots, which is desperately needed. Davis is working on it and should be able to fill that role eventually, but not this season. As we have seen recently, without a player with that shot on the floor, teams can play the Celtics very differently and make them much less effective.

by papa shuttlesworth on Feb 19, 2009 12:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Smith was measured at the same height as Rasheed in his pre draft workout: 6'9.5"

http://forums.interbasket.net/f6/nba-nba-pre-draft-measurement-4427/

I have a bunch of other links as well if anyone wants them but its from Googling

almost all of the guys are1- 2 or so inches shorter than listed in media guides so the relative heights matter. Its reasonable to guess he has 2 inches on Leon and we all know he can jump higher

by wahz on Feb 19, 2009 12:24 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Smith has had multiple knee injuries and his arms are not nearly as long as Powe’s I’ll take Powe on the glass ANY DAY over Joe Smith.

by Brickowski on Feb 19, 2009 12:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think you are underestimating length

Joe is not as long as PJ, but definitely longer than Powe or Davis, which matter defensively. He also can reliably knock down the midrange J he is sure to get, much better than the current 2. He is definitely an upgrade, even if not a dramatic one.

by KJ33 on Feb 19, 2009 1:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Options

Gabe vs. Stephon: Advantage Gabe. Reason: he’s had 2 years to learn the Cs’ system, he is very aggressive and good on defense, he has shown flashes of brilliance on offense, and he gets along with everyone. Now is his time to shine. Doc has said he’s going to give him a shot, and (of course) hopes he makes it. Marbury would be coming in ice cold, with a history of (very) bad chemistry, and NO knowledge of our system. KG lately has been talking about maintaining team “harmony” if there’s to be any new players… a broad hint that Marbury (a) is potentially dangerous, and (b) better behave himself if he does come.

Joe Smith vs. Oberto: Advantage Smith. They’re the same height. Joe is the better defender, better free throw shooter and better athlete. And Joe seems like the one that would fit in better. Given two equal players, always take the one that WANTS to be here… he’ll play his heart out.

Tony Allen, JR Giddens, POB: That’s the order of players I would get rid of if the need arises. Tony Allen first, if at all possible (but that would probably have to happen today), because he is extremely injury prone and a knucklehead. JR seems like the guy nobody ever invites for Christmas… if you’re gonna ignore him anyway, dump him if you need the spot. And then POB… I put him last in this group because at least he’s 7’1" and has some potential, I suppose… though he is a knucklehead too and I am not at all sanguine about his prospects.

by DRJ1 on Feb 19, 2009 12:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Oberto is a better player than Joe Smith. Trust me on this.

by Brickowski on Feb 19, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed — Oberto is far superior

by Who on Feb 19, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

umm...

I’d have to go the opposite on every single one of them. With the exception of maybe getting rid of Tony before Giddens.. I’m on board with that.

by TomHamilton30 on Feb 19, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Smith + Marbury = Banner 18

This is my feeling as well. Those of you touting Pruitt or Sam at this point are nuts. Marbury bring scoring off the bench, which we sorely need. And Smith brings a reliable perimeter shot, which I think we need more than length.

If we can land both, we will be in the drivers seat for banner 18.

by droopdog7 on Feb 19, 2009 12:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know what to make of Joe Smith. I’d definitely want Danny to sign him if he were available, because he is a quality player and does add something different to the bench.

However, like Brickowski, I’m not convinced he’s an upgrade over BBD/Powe. More different, than better.

by Who on Feb 19, 2009 1:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Us getting Joe AND Marbury would be so nice. But at this point im just hoping we get at least one.

by Marqui on Feb 19, 2009 1:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why isn't Oberto playing much

I’m not in the Joe Smith camp, but Oberto isn’t getting much time on the Spurs. I’m still for the Leon/BBD plan. Very good point about who picks up LeBron and Kobey when Pierce is out. Time to see what Walker’s got. He wasn’t afraid of Lebron during preseason.

by Wildblu1 on Feb 19, 2009 1:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Two reasons:

(1) Popovich is using Bonner for his shooting ability, trying to open up the offense more.
(2) Popovich is making a mistake because Oberto is fourth or fifth best player (George Hill) on that team

by Who on Feb 19, 2009 3:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, why isn’t Joe Smith playing that much? If he were that good, he wouldn’t be getting bought out.

by Brickowski on Feb 19, 2009 4:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
coaches are pathetic
Small
Doc, Start Doing Your Job!
Images_small
STOP HATING ON CELTICS
Shelden_small
WARNING! Spoiler alert!
Small
Brilliant Marketing
Small
The Lakers got the worst of the Artest-Ariza exchange
Small
atlanta is good
Ruby_7-08_hb_2yrs_old_002__2__small
What the Celtics are missing...an identity!!
Small
The Inconvenience of Eddie House
Small
Spoiled Fan

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small indeedproceed

300h_small Wide Load

Authors

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Small tenaciousT

Big_4_small jimmyt

Celtics_shirt_small Greg Payne