Disaster In Salt Lake City
A Daily Babble Production
The team that misses nearly 35 percent of their free throws in a game doesn't deserve to win. The team that turns the ball over makes it harder for itself to win (the fact that the Celtics have managed to turn the ball over quite a bit while still winning regularly through most of the year notwithstanding). The team that doesn't execute at the end of the game doesn't deserve to win. Same for the squad whose coach makes an enormous gaffe in the waning seconds with the game still hanging in the balance (more on that later).
Along with those three issues, the Celtics were without their best defensive player in the second half, the Jazz had the refs (more later) and the crowd, and Utah moved the ball fluidly and got open shots at the end of the game. All that in mind, it's not exactly a shock that Utah pulled out a 90-85 victory last night. Boogah.
Most pressing issue first: Best wishes to Kevin Garnett for a speedy recovery. Hope you're all right, Big Ticket.
Beyond that, a smattering of post-loss thoughts:
- Can't say enough good things about Kendrick Perkins. Not only did he limit Paul Millsap to a miserable 3-for-10 shooting night (one of which was the insane 15-foot off-the-glass wing-jumper with the continuation), but he contributed offensively and came up big on the glass. At this point, I'm not looking for the guy to get too comfortable shooting outside-the-paint jumpers, because, as The Guru says, we'll end up paying for that down the road if he gets trigger-happy. But it was nice to see him bank one in and then swish a second, and he made a couple of good moves for a dunk, a hook shot and an and-one inside. A 6-for-6 night from the field complete with 11 rebounds is hardly cause for complaint. Down the stretch, Perk blocked Millsap underneath (one of his three swats for the game) in a tie game, came up with a critical defensive rebound with less than two minutes to play and the game still tied and then gave the Celts an extra possession at the other end by hustling his way to a key offensive rebound. He was tenacious on the glass, and his defense was excellent all night. My only complaint would be the foul trouble, but for the most part, it was a fine night for the big man in the middle.
- Let's get this out of the way now: A look at the Babble archives will indicate that I don't make a habit of complaining about officials, particularly with regard to Celtics games. A look at the introduction to this piece will make it clear that I don't think they deserve primary blame for the way this one turned out, especially when one considers that Utah only shot two more free throws than the C's by night's end. But I am going out of my way to note that they were horrendous last night. Maybe my Tommy-green glasses were cranked up to too high a prescription, but it certainly looked as though Utah was being allowed to do what it wanted physically on defense while the Celts weren't getting the benefit of the doubt, and the offensive fouls weren't being called consistently both ways. The second-quarter sequence in which Gabe Pruitt got whacked on a lay-up and then slapped with a touch foul for putting his hand on Deron Williams' hip coming up court was more than enough for me. That was criminal. Without question, the Celtics got their chances at the line late and failed to convert on several, and they also committed a few of the bad fouls that some of the bigs on this team are prone to doing. But I can't remember watching a game and being annoyed to quite that extent with the officials in a while, so it seemed worth noting.
- Matt Harpring deserves all kinds of credit. That dude is tough. He did a fine job bodying up Paul Pierce all night. Jerry Sloan even left Andrei Kirilenko on the bench at key spots late in the game because the stronger Harpring was causing Pierce so much trouble. PP shot just 7-for-19 from the field and was forced into some high degree-of-difficulty shots down the stretch. The power Pierce plays with as a small forward remains one of his biggest advantages on most nights, and a defender who matches that physical intensity and force with some degree of success earns plenty of respect here.
- Strong game for Rajon Rondo in terms of his shots going to the basket. He committed to attacking hard and looking to finish at the rim rather than pulling up for floaters. It resulted in a nice 5-for-7 shooting night that included an emphatic driving dunk in the second half.
- The Jazz might not have played great basketball for the game as a whole, but they did execute their offensive sets down the stretch. The Mehmet Okur three that tied the game came as a result of Deron Williams doing a fine job drawing Brian Scalabrine too far down toward the baseline and then kicking back to an open Memo. The next play, the Jazz crossed the Celts up by having Okur cut to the rim for an easy lay-in off a Millsap feed. The jumper that put the Jazz ahead to stay was a wide-open foul-line look for Harpring, created once more by Williams drawing additional defensive attention. Of course, Deron also hit the big bucket from the top of the key that put the Jazz up four with 20 seconds left. Well done, Utah.
- One major coaching issue for me in this game: the personnel on the floor for Andrei Kirilenko's second free-throw attempt with eight seconds to play. The Celtics were down three at this point with no timeouts left. Barring a miracle, a miss followed by a defensive rebound and a three-pointer was going to be this team's only realistic shot to tie the game. In theory, that makes grabbing the rebound off any potential Kirilenko miss rather important. With Brian Scalabrine fouled out and Garnett injured, Doc Rivers' three choices for the two low blocks spots appeared to be Large Baby, Leon Powe and Kendrick Perkins. He went with...drumroll please...Paul Pierce and Ray Allen. Those two were on the floor along with Rajon Rondo, Eddie House and Gabe Pruitt. I understand the idea of looking to maximize perimeter shooting, but none of that is relevant if the team can't gain possession of the ball while still trailing by only one possession. You know the rest by now. The ball comes off to Allen's side. He fails to get the rebound. Ronnie Brewer does and hits two foul shots to douse the Celtics' hopes.
The most infuriating part? This isn't the first time a Doc team has lost a game in that sort of situation. It happened against the Magic back on November 13, 2006. In his most prominent anti-Doc rant of that nightmare season, Bill Simmons described that situation in vivid and painful detail:
Eventually, Orlando regained the lead and clinched the game on one of those "team grabs an offensive rebound off a missed free throw, then gets the backbreaking layup off a bad defensive switch" sequences that have defined the Doc era. Following the game, Doc blamed Pierce for failing to box out on the missed free throw, which was interesting for two reasons. First, Pierce DID box out. I recorded the game on TiVo. The ball just bounced over his head. It happens. And second, instead of putting in two rebounders with Trevor Ariza at the line (a poor free throw shooter), Doc went in the other direction and yanked Kendrick Perkins (our tallest guy) for Ryan Gomes (who's 6-foot-7), leaving two small forwards on the low block to grab a potential Ariza miss with less than 90 seconds to play. I mentioned that he's a career 60 percent FT shooter, right? The important thing to remember is that the whole thing was Pierce's fault because he was too short to grab the rebound. Whatever.
This isn't to say the Celtics win the game last night if Doc substitutes before the free throw. The team still had just eight seconds and needed a trey just to tie the game. But at least the Celts would have likely had a shot.
- On the flip side regarding Doc, I refuse to complain about the reliance on the Paul Pierce isolation late in the game. When it worked a week ago as Pierce spent the fourth quarter obliterating the Mavs, I loved every second of it and didn't spend any word space talking about any need for more ball movement in those spots and less "Give the ball to Paul and get out of his way." It feels disingenuous to turn around and second-guess now on a night when it didn't play out as well. Pierce is still this team's top go-to guy in the clutch, and those iso sets and 3-1 screen rolls have played an integral role in several Celtics victories this year. Some nights, the shots don't fall (and Pierce's man does a better job than most). Not saying Doc shouldn't have adjusted, just that I can live with what happened. We'll survive.
- Loved the defense in the first quarter. The Celts contested every Utah shot and held the Jazz to 4-of-21 from the field and 13 points for the period. I wasn't as enamored the rest of the way, but it tends to be difficult to match 4-of-21 every quarter and even more so when the team loses its best defender for the entirety of the second half.
- Silver lining: The late start for those on the East Coast meant that there was a reasonable chance The Guru wasn't going to hang in all the way through, so we held our customary postgame chat through halftime and a good portion of the second half. There's reason to believe the overall mood of the conversation was more positive than it might have been had we held it at 1:30 in the morning after that particular ending. That said, chatting hoops and life with my dad is the ultimate highlight of every Celtics game experience for me, and it is always a pleasure no matter the result of the contest. Last night was no exception. Thanks, Dad.
Get well soon, KG.
0 recs |
24 comments
|
Comments
all good comments,sw. my rant-the reffing this year is really bad and inconsistent. it affects all teams. i am tired of the rookie, i.e. the call on pruit, miscall but let the vet off the hook call. i am tired of the ref’s (bavetta) ego getting into play and taking over the game. last night it was ticky tacky one way, bruising the other. that’s how high priced athletes get hurt.stern can get off his rich butt and get the ref situation cleaned up-there is more going on out there than we know and this is not paranoia. we blame the basball players for steroids and it really was the owners and commish. who were getting fannies in seats and looking elsewhere who were the real culprits.
by nazzbo on Feb 20, 2009 1:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sorry but I respectfully disagree about Harpring. I refuse to give anybody credit for playing football on a basketball court.
And I don’t see the need for any caveats or homer disclaimers for the referees. That game was ridiculously officiated and Dick Bavetta led the way. The most ridiculous part was probably when he called a “put you in your place” foul on Pruitt because Gabe had the audacity to do what every player does and say “where’s the foul” on his previous shot attempt (and it was probably an uncalled foul too). It wasn’t a foul. The same thing wasn’t called the rest of the game, and if it had been Harpring would have fouled out walking up the court on one play.
by Berkcelt on Feb 20, 2009 1:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good recap Steve
You really know how to make basketball more than “just basketball!”
I guess I am used to “imperfect” officiating. It’s simply something our team and our coach have little control over. What they do have control over is their reaction to the way the game is being called. I think the C’s were by and large handling the wierd calls until that Pruitt touch call. Then it really went downhill after Scal had to sit. I think the C’s became just a little fatalistic about the outcome instead of imposing their will.
And I do have a bone to pick with the Pierce iso’s last night. Yeah, on most nights he’s hard to stop even for good defenders. You know the old saying, “Run that play until they prove they can stop you?” Well, last night Pierce was stoppable. I fully admit to using 20/20 hindsight, but I think that Rondo penetrating and perhaps dishing to Perk would have resulted in higher percentage plays.
But that’s not all. The C’s are becoming a one-trick pony again, climbing on Paul’s back to get us over the hump. Pierce iso was the automatic call when the team stunk. We were able to get away from that last year. Our team needs crunch time options, rehearsed in actual crunch time. Last night was a perfect opportunity to find or practice another crunch time option.
You rightfully picked up on some really good play by some of our guys. Perk amazed. Powe got it together after a miserable opening appearance. Rondo did his thing. Doc made some good calls out of timeouts though I certainly won’t say he outcoached Sloan. I enjoyed the game despite the frustrating officiating and, well, the outcome. Too bad I didn’t have a Guru around to break it down with me. ; )
by Thruthelookingglass on Feb 20, 2009 1:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I have to disagree on the topic of (over)reliance on Pierce during the fourth quarter. More often than not he’s been money in those situations, so I don’t have a problem with the strategy, in general. But Doc has to recognize that Pierce is not having a good game and set up something else. Pierce wasn’t even making free throws last night. They wasted too many possessions going to a player who wasn’t making shots and that was one of the biggest reasons they lost the game.
by BilboMcFonzie on Feb 20, 2009 1:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Pierce has to recognize too...
a couple times he could have looked for Ray, but didn’t. Also, didn’t drive to the hole against Harpring on any of last few possessions. Definitely wish Doc had given something else a try. They stuck with it against Dallas because it was working. But last night Pierce clearly didn’t have it at all in the fourth, and neither Doc nor PP adjusted.
by datruthyall on Feb 20, 2009 8:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know a college coach here where i live and he tells his players that to win on the road, we have to be ten points better than them
Its the way it is. I hope our guys have this instilled in them too
by wahz on Feb 20, 2009 2:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That’s a great way to put itin perspective. Smart guy.
by Thruthelookingglass on Feb 20, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Right there with ya on the refs
I’m not normally one to be overly critical of them. I figure they’re gonna make bad calls, and sometimes we’re the beneficiaries, and sometimes the other team is.
Like you, I can’t remember a game where I thought the calls were that unfair to us. Just egregiously bad. Thank goodness that doesn’t happen too often.
I do wonder about something though. It’s that increasingly this year, I think we’ve got a reputation of being a physical team, and I do notice a difference in the officiating against us. I think perhaps the league has decided to give us extra scrutiny, and to not allow us any benefit of doubt. It’s possible anyway, but particularly over the last month or two, they seem to have tightened up the calls against us.
But like I said, I normally don’t get upset about it, but last night was just egregious.
by Mencius on Feb 20, 2009 2:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It’s not just the calls against us, it’s more of a problem that other teams are allowed to hammer us without a call being made. Rondo just goes flying and no call. We go to the bucket hammered- no call. It’s getting stupid. Teams are just allowed to beat up on us.
by liamail on Feb 20, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the one I keep noticing
is when perkins posts-up, as rare as it is, he gets hammered half the time and he never goes to the line on one of his post-moves.
by WillyBeamin on Feb 20, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
at the same time
perkins has gotten better at not drawing contact, and has earned more respect with the refs. the foul problems of the past have rarely been a major issue with him this year. yet he continues to be a presence in the middle.
by WillyBeamin on Feb 20, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Refs, Pierce, et al
I’ve ranted about NBA refs before. To me, it’s clearly a major flaw in the NBA. One that is costing them plenty with the fans. I’ve personally come close to giving up on the NBA many times, and I know for sure that one day I will give up. Multiply that by several million, and you can imagine how much this costs the league. Sorry, but they’re very stupid to not recognize this. Instead, they cling to their antiquated system, possibly because they like being able to control outcomes. Do they do this because they think it’s good business to keep the league competitive with their game-controlling calls? Could they be that stupidly self-destructive, not recognizing how many fans are alienated by their ridiculous “officiating”? My answer is yes, they can be that stupid.
The simple solution is to go back to 2 refs on the floor, with 2 Video Refs that can overturn any call on the floor, etc. We all see every play in extreme detail these days, and we know what’s really happening in almost-perfect real time. Why on earth wouldn’t the NBA want to use that technology to assure accurate refereeing? Man, they have no idea how many fans are super-pissed-off over this. Many have already given up, and many more will give up in the future. (Note that this does not mean that all bad calls are part of a conspiracy. What I am saying is that the decision to avoid video in the refereeing process perpetuates the antiquated system that leads to innumerable errors — in ADDITION to any game fixing that may go on.)
As for the end-game PP strategy… my problem is that there WAS no plan this time. With about 1 minute to go, they just dribbled around looking for a 1-on-1 opening, then passed the ball to PP to do his thing. Call that a “play”? A “plan”? I don’t care if it works sometimes, it’s still stupid. Now the game winner on Feb 3 vs. Philly (Ray to PP to Ray in the corner “for the game…GOT IT”)… that was a PLAY, a PLAN. What I saw last night was nothing… no play, no plan, just send it to PP and hope for the best. Pathetic, Doc.
by DRJ1 on Feb 20, 2009 3:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Its no longer conspiracy that the refs are terrible in celtics games, its fact, for the last month the celtics have been playing 5 on 8 on the road and even at home for crying out loud, and I know this sounds whiny and homerish…but they’ve been terrible, and its been a stuggle to even get through some of these games for us fans and the celtics players… the celtics arent being allowed to play basketball, plain and simple, theyre getting called for every damn thing, meanwhile the opposing team can push, shove, trip, scratch, really just foul at will and not get called for anything…Im sorry but its really starting to look like a conspiracy to damage the celtics overall record..
I understand the refs suck in every game, every night, but they’ve playoff conspiracy bad against the celtics in every game lately
by TheAncientRivalry on Feb 20, 2009 4:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
One major coaching issue for me in this game: the personnel on the floor for Andrei Kirilenko’s second free-throw attempt with eight seconds to play. The Celtics were down three at this point with no timeouts left. Barring a miracle, a miss followed by a defensive rebound and a three-pointer was going to be this team’s only realistic shot to tie the game. In theory, that makes grabbing the rebound off any potential Kirilenko miss rather important. With Brian Scalabrine fouled out and Garnett injured, Doc Rivers’ three choices for the two low blocks spots appeared to be Large Baby, Leon Powe and Kendrick Perkins. He went with…drumroll please…Paul Pierce and Ray Allen. Those two were on the floor along with Rajon Rondo, Eddie House and Gabe Pruitt. I understand the idea of looking to maximize perimeter shooting, but none of that is relevant if the team can’t gain possession of the ball while still trailing by only one possession. You know the rest by now. The ball comes off to Allen’s side. He fails to get the rebound. Ronnie Brewer does and hits two foul shots to douse the Celtics’ hopes.
You have 1 chance to hit a three pointer with 9 seconds on the clock and no timeouts left. It’s a gamble either way. Hindsight is 20/20, but if Kirilenko missed the first and scored the second, we might have had a different conversation altogether here.
by kozlodoev on Feb 20, 2009 4:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
were we out of timeouts???
if we had a timeout, then this is plain and simple a terrible coaching move.
by WillyBeamin on Feb 20, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We were out of timeouts, but I still think it was a terrible move
While it’s a gamble either way as koz says, it seems to me to be a case of putting the cart before the horse doing it the way Doc did – none of the shooting personnel matters if you can’t get the rebound first.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Feb 20, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the same was true
on the previous possession. It’s all well and good to sub in an extra shooter or two, but why take out Perk at all, when an offensive rebound and putback could also tie the game? If I was asking this question before the foul shots were even taken… how do 5 coaches not notice?
Can’t really place blame on the refs when the foul shots evened out by the end. We lost this one to poor coaching down the stretch.
by datruthyall on Feb 20, 2009 8:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
nice work, steve
Its like this with doc: he is good or very good at every aspect of coaching basketball, but be almost completely brain dead when it comes to knowing who to have on the floor.
by wahz on Feb 20, 2009 8:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, wahz
I’ve come a long way on Doc, and I have and continue to believe that he is the right coach for this particular team. But he’s still got his flaws, and I think you hit it right on the head: on-court personnel has consistently been my biggest coaching complaint on the occasions that I’ve been frustrated this year.
This one gets to me a bit extra just because this was a situation that had already played out previously – as Simmons explained.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Feb 20, 2009 9:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Regarding the refs: this is Utah we're talking about
Umm…people using the one-sided officiating in last night’s game as an example of how the officiating around the league has suddenly gotten worse are missing the forest for the trees. The Jazz have ALWAYS pounded their opponents on every defensive possession, and count on the probability that when they’re playing in Utah, the refs eventually get tired of blowing the whistle after hearing vociferous boos on EVERY previous call on the Jazz, no matter how egregious the contact. This is how Utah has always played under Jerry Sloan. Those of us out here in the Western Conference know this. It’s not just last night’s officiating crew, it’s EVERY officiating crew in the league except Javie’s.
Get well soon, KG. I want to see you recovered before the Eastern (and then the NBA) Finals.
by The Dude Abides on Feb 20, 2009 6:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Much thanks for the explanation, TDA
One of our readers brought up the issue of wondering how the Jazz had enjoyed so much success at home over such an extended period – and that’s an interesting part of the equation. Appreciate you dropping by to spread the insight.
And since The Big Lebowski is my all-time favorite movie, we’ve always got room for someone paying homage to the film. :-D
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Feb 20, 2009 9:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Steve
Your last comment really tied the thread together
by The Dude Abides on Feb 20, 2009 10:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I just felt like I needed to draw my line in the sand
This defensive aggression in Utah must not stand.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Feb 20, 2009 11:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Evening the fouls didn't necessarily help
the Celtics. There weren’t any and ones called, and I think the frantic dash to make the game more evenly reffed, took away from the Celtics creating any offensive flow. In the fourth quarter the Celtics scored successfully, without the help of a free throw, on only four possesions. Its not so much the foul shots, as much as it is game rhythm being disrupted. The C’s had the game under their thumb(s), but I just had the feeling that they would end up losing because the game had no flow to it.
David Stern’s lack of acknowledgement of any problems with the officiating is what gets me the most. I just get the feeling that he doesn’t care if anyone ever thinks the refs didn’t do their jobs, and he is more concerned about people involved in the game complaining about poor officiating than poor officiating itself. Sorry for the poor analagy here, but it is like a wife(Stern) protecting her abusive husband(Officials), and the teams are the kids who are supposed to just look away. It is hurting the league more than Stern would ever admit.
by Hedger on Feb 20, 2009 11:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















