Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 7 Important Questions About The Heat Vs. Celtics Series

The Redhead Fills It Up

A Daily Babble Production

Without a doubt, a newly sleeved point guard was the story of yesterday's Celtics win in Phoenix.  As Jeff covered in his recap, Rajon Rondo celebrated his 23rd birthday in style, dominating the Suns with a career high 32 points to go with his 10 assists and six rebounds in the 128-108 victory.  In the few minutes when Raj wasn't gliding past Steve Nash for scoop lay-ups or even knocking down a few jumpers, it was also a pleasure to witness a season-high scoring effort for a certain redheaded fellow.

I've been pleasantly surprised by much of what Brian Scalabrine has brought to this team when on the floor this season.  His defensive rotations and man-to-man performances on the perimeter (two areas where I thought him over-credited a season ago) look improved.  He plays smart basketball, occasionally manages to avoid foul trouble and has not been a black hole at the offensive end this season.  He is hitting threes at a decent clip (38.2 percent) and his 54.1 percent true shooting is an important improvement over last year's abominable 42.8, though both of those figures come over sample sizes that aren't exactly gigantic.

But while Scal has stepped in as a capable reserve and spot starter at times throughout this season, it still isn't often that he comes up with a significant scoring effort.  Yesterday featured one such performance.

Star-divide

Scal broke into double-figures for the third time this season and tied the third-highest scoring total of his Celtics career with his 14 points on Sunday.  In doing so, he showed off a more varied array of offensive talents than Celts fans are accustomed to seeing.

The first bucket came courtesy of some good off-the-ball movement on Scal's part combined with the Suns' characteristic lack of attention to detail on defense.  The redhead drifted beneath the Suns' interior defenders to just below the right block on the baseline, waited for Rajon Rondo to find him with a bounce pass, caught, turned and dunked.

The right corner three that came later in the half as the Celtics were starting to open the game up was less of a surprise from Scal.  In the interim between the dunk and the three, however, he gave us one of the lastingly scarring images of the season.  With the Suns trapping as the Celtics brought the ball up the floor, Scal caught the ball just in front of halfcourt, saw that his passing options to the wings were limited and decided to, uh, take care of the press himself.  There's a reason he isn't known for his ball-handling.  The forward barreled into the paint, careened into an unsuspecting Louis Amundson and managed to earn his way to the foul line via blocking foul.  Two splashes ensued.

In the second half, Scal made sure he played a role in the track meet part of the game that every Suns contest becomes at some point.  As he saw Rajon Rondo secure the carom off a Steve Nash miss, he released down the floor, once again getting behind the entirety of the Suns' defense.  Rondo hit him with a length-of-the-floor feed for a lay-in.  Beautiful break.

Another three and a pull-up jumper (off the dribble!) that rattled in followed.  When it was all said and done, Scal had gone 5-for-8 from the field to score his 14 points, making him the fourth of five Celtics to figure in double-figures as the team reached its highest scoring output of the season. 

Without a doubt, the extra possessions accrued by playing such an uptempo game and the fact that the Suns don't guard anybody helped inflate his work.  By no means will this necessarily become a trend.  But that didn't make it any less enjoyable to see the always-scrapping Brian Scalabrine bust out for a nice scoring effort in an impressive victory in Kevin Garnett's absence.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

He sure did fill it up

It was a good thing he did, because the Suns small ball lineup (with Hill at the 4) negated his usual quickness advantage at power forward. His defense was not good yesterday.

Actually, since he returned, his offense has been ahead of his defense, surprisingly enough. If you remember back to the Utah game, he mistakenly left Okur alone on the perimeter for a late 3 which tied to game. Normally, Scal sniffs that play out.

I’d rather he get back to his defensive ways. His offense is fools gold.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 23, 2009 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

How about just letting the guy have his day in the Sun?!

As usual he came in filling in for KG and played a very solid game hitting some important baskets at needed times. He was smart offensively as he always is and didn’t force things. He didn’t play any worse defense than anyone else did and was often guarding a smaller player. If you are going to rip players who had good games but weren’t at their best then start with Rondo letting Nash blow past him time and time again. Rondo was the one that was supposed to switch on that pick and roll the other night over to Okur and didn’t do it letting Okur hit the three. That is what a pick does. Makes the guys switch who they are defending…

Scal was very very good yesterday and was a big contributor to that squad. I’m really getting tired of the nonsense about him. If he was making vet minimum he would be heralded as the steal of the bench. I’m glad Doc values Scal and you guys aren’t the ones making up the lineup.

by EJPLAYA on Feb 23, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't forget

This was Scals 2nd day back and he played 37 minutes. You could see he was tired, but he gutted thru it. That could explain his poor defense (which I don’t agree with you on).

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird

by TrueGreen on Feb 23, 2009 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree that this year Scal has raised his game to deliver on what we were promised. That was not evident last year. I think the prospect of real PT as well as the continued confidence of his coaches has contributed.

I’ve long considered Scal our “everyman,” the guy living our collective dream. Love to see him contribute like this. Kinda gives me the warm fuzzies, um, in a macho athletics sort of way.

by Thruthelookingglass on Feb 23, 2009 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

Scoring good...

…defense bad.

Early on, Scals was atrocious on D. His rotations were terrible and in the first quarter he was easily responsible for 6 to 8 points for the Suns. Maybe he was just sleepy, but for much of the contest he looked very slow rotating or blitzing the screen and roll.

While the offensive contributions were great, net of the defense, I don’t think Scal brought much value yesterday.

When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"

by Green17 on Feb 23, 2009 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

Ummm. Isn't he Brian Scalabrine?

Anything he contributes is a positive. If he were a good defender, then it wouldn’t take injuries form him to play. He is what he is. You can’t complain about the deficiencies of a roster filler. He sits at the end of benches for a reason.

by wondahbap on Feb 23, 2009 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Shows how big of a scrub he is, if he contributes 14 pts, its shocking and people make a big deal out of it…Im glad hes contributing but I dont like the idea of counting on him, hes flat out not very good, and ideally he doesnt play a second in the playoffs, considering he didnt when we won it all

by TheAncientRivalry on Feb 23, 2009 2:55 PM EST reply actions  

so if a guy isn't a big-time scorer that indicates him a big scrub?

Wonder how Daryl Morey, Michael Lewis, Shane Battier and Bruce Bowen (just to name a few) feel about that.

-sw

P.S. Of course, Battier and Bowen have both broken into double-figures more frequently than Scal over the courses of their careers, but I think the point stands.

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Feb 23, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, brian scalabrine isnt shane battier or bruce bowen, hes a scrub no matter which way you look at it honestly, not because he isnt a scorer, that has nothing to do with it

by TheAncientRivalry on Feb 23, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

It has nothing to do with it?

That’s not quite how I read the following:

Shows how big of a scrub he is, if he contributes 14 pts, its shocking and people make a big deal out of it.

Perhaps you can see why it appeared from your original comment that being a scorer had everything to do with it.

Of course Scal isn’t on the level of either of those players. But there are players around the league making contributions without being big-time scorers, which is why I thought your initial comment was unfair.

In the meantime, your logic about how "ideally he doesn’t play a second in the playoffs, considering he didn’t when we won it all" seems flawed. This team has different personnel than it did last year, which makes simply ruling people out because we were successful with different players and without them on the floor last season seems rather silly to me.

Joe Smith and Mikki Moore didn’t play a second for us in last year’s playoffs either. Should we not look to use them either?

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Feb 23, 2009 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Come on, Steve

Scal is nowhere near Battier or Bowen. Seriously. The point DOES NOT stand as applied to Scal.

Scal has had a good run since January…let’s hope he can keep it up.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 23, 2009 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I think my comment to TAR above clarifies, SaMP

There’s no claim here that Scal is Battier or Bowen. My problem was with the way TAR presented his comment, the inference being that simply because someone isn’t an impact scorer, he’s a scrub. My problem there is on a general ideological level, not as specifically with regard to Scal.

Hope that clears up what I was saying.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Feb 23, 2009 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, it does

TAR was a little sloppy in what he was trying to get across. I agree with you on the general ideological level (nice turn of phrase, btw) too.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 23, 2009 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Even if I give you...

the benefit of the doubt that yesterday wasn’t his best defensive effort, are you really that hard pressed to rip on Scal that you take a strength of his and label it a weakness?! The guy continually plays very good team defense and very good man on man defense against PF’s. He was matched up against Grant Hill during that time. You really think he should have been able to keep Hill in front of him?! They were playing really small ball and the guy is a 4. That’s the problem with us not having a backup 3. I don’t blame Scal for that. When he defends his own position he plays very well. Labeling him a poor defender because he can’t stay in front of Hill or Jason Richardson is like saying KG is a poor defender if he can’t keep Chris Paul in front of him. Please guys. Make an ATTEMPT at being objective and truthful with your comments.

by EJPLAYA on Feb 23, 2009 3:29 PM EST reply actions  

who is that in response to?

When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"

by Green17 on Feb 23, 2009 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

chill out dog

We all know Scal can’t defend Hill—that’s why it was nice that his offense made up for the fact that he was a human turnstile on the defensive end. As I noted in my first post, Scal’s usual quickness advantage at the 4 was negated by the Suns small ball lineup yesterday, so he really needed to score or we’d be hurting. And that’s why Green 17 made the point that while Scal’s offense was great, his lack of defense made his real contribution marginal at best.

And I’m not sure what making ATTEMPT at being objective or truthful has to do with anything. These were/are truthful and objective.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 23, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

oh that post by EJPLAYA was directed to me?

No I don’t think he should be able to guard Hill 1 on 1. My problem with Scal was that he missed rotations and failed to slowdown both Barbosa and Nash in the first quarter on a fast break and screen/roll. That was really what I was referring to. He wiffed on those rotations and a basket ensued directly as a result. That was my point EJ. Speaking only about yesterday (not about long-term strengths and weaknesses as you’ve termed the debate), I didn’t think Scal was much of a positive influence on the outcome of the game as SW did, hence my comment.

Thanks for taking it out of context and then claiming I’m not objective or truthful though.

When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"

by Green17 on Feb 23, 2009 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you post the same thing in regards to Rondo?

Because we could say the same about him. He contributed very nicely on the offensive end, but was letting Nash and Barbosa blow past him and also whiffing on pick and roll situations.

Point being that SW writes this nice article about how well Scal filled in for KG and all anyone can do is rip him for something he had no control over. He isn’t going to be able to stay with those guys defensively, but that doesn’t negate the very big game he had offensively.

If you read my post and felt guilty then I was probably directing it at you. (although it was meant for Scal rippers in general not anyone specific.)

by EJPLAYA on Feb 23, 2009 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

SW is my boy.

We can disagree and not have it being labeled as ripping someone.

When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"

by Green17 on Feb 23, 2009 6:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to get this started all over again

But in the Suns game I was worried about Scal’s D early on. However, I thought that as the game progressed he did a better job.

Even when overmatched (which I will grant is most of the time) he generally able to push his guy to help or at least interfere a little. I thought he handled switches to Nash well and kept Nash from easy baskets and passes. One of the talking heads related an interesting comment by Scal before the game, that since he is not quick he has to think fast and anticipate. He anticipates fairly well, but it’s true he has a hard time recovering when he’s made the wrong guess or is indecisive. I think this is one reason he got better during the game—he began to understand what the Suns were likely to do.

I do wish we weren’t forced to rely on him as much as we do; however, I think he’s really making the best of what he has to offer our team.

by Thruthelookingglass on Feb 24, 2009 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Nice season for Scal

Has been one of our most reliable bench players. He deserves some recognition.

by cordobes on Feb 23, 2009 3:34 PM EST reply actions  

And RELIABILITY is exactly what the Celtics need.

That’s why he’s been so valuable. He consistency and versatility have been great all year. To me he’s like the anti-Tony Allen, and therefore a great fit for the 2008-2009 Celtics.

by Toine43 on Feb 23, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

scal has improved.period. he has his limits but so don’t they all. he hustles and he seems to grasp tibs’ defense. he spreads the floor. and the others seem to have confidence in him.

by nazzbo on Feb 23, 2009 3:54 PM EST reply actions  

Steve W is thru the Looking Glass

If you took the stats for this season and excluded (Giddens, Walker, Pruitt) Scal is dead LAST in ALL these categories: Total Rebounds Per Game, Defensive Rebounds Per Game, Assists Per Game, Steals Per Game, POints Per Game

He played last night for 37 minutes and he is 6’ft 10 and got 2 rebounds!!!!! 2!!!! and one of those fell into his hands. "Filling what up? If you are 6’ft 10in tall and you are dead last in all these categories on your team you better have a bag full of intangibles and that means more than 14 points in 37 minutes jackin up three point shots when you should be down in the paint gettin your nose dirty. What the heck Steve?? MIssouri air got you dizzy

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Feb 23, 2009 4:28 PM EST reply actions  

Scal's got a GIANT bag of intangibles

But see the thing with intangibles is that you can’t see them….which allows Scal to carry one of the biggest bags of intangibles of all-time and not be noticed for it.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 23, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Scal does do a nice job of boxing out

He may not grab the boards, but he still contributes in that area. And don’t just brush that aside as myth. Scals actually does that, and it does help the team.

by Toine43 on Feb 23, 2009 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Curiously

The team grabs more rebounds when Scal is on the floor! And the reason for that is quite tangible. Or, at least, is visible. Although not in a box-score, I’m afraid.

Scal is a terrible fantasy player, you indeed have a point.

by cordobes on Feb 23, 2009 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't Forget Setting Picks

KG is great at moving around and setting the right pick at the right time at the correct position on the floor. Scals obviously is not as good as this as KG, but he gives us some of this which is a big part of the offensive system

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird

by TrueGreen on Feb 23, 2009 8:10 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
"We really have only 2 options to keep winning."
Small
Celtics vs. Heat - ECF Matchup
Small
How Avery Bradley's absence affects everyone else
Small
Thoughts on Celtics vs. Heat
Small
Already Doubting The Celtics?
Small
Start Pavlovic over Ray to cover Dirty Wade
Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi