Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

Not Enough (Part II)

Piercespurs_medium

Celtics are now 1 - 4 vs. the teams that are legit title contenders this year (LA, Cleveland, San Antonio).

  • 23 points for Matt Bonner.  I like the local guy and all, but how do you let that happen?
  • Too bad because nobody will remember this 16 assist, 5 rebound, 1 turnover game by Rondo.
  • The Spurs shot lights out from deep, especially in the first half.  That explains, in part, why we gave up 105 points.  That usually doesn't happen.
  • Ray's inbound gaff is another thing that doesn't usually happen.  Ray is so consistently good, that when he makes a mistake, it is jarring.
  • Perk had a quiet but solid game with 5-5 shooting, 7 boards, and one memorable block on Timmay.
  • Nice to see the Good Tony Allen today.

I gotta tip my cap to the Spurs.  Duncan and Ginobili played great games as usual.  They shot the ball well and got a big lift from Bonner.   They are who we thought they were.

Star-divide

Boston
 Starters Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  R. Rondo G 38:52 3-11 0-0 0-0 +5 1 5 16 1 1 0 2 2
  R. Allen G 38:08 8-18 1-5 1-1 +1 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 3 18 
  K. Perkins C 34:14 5-5 0-0 0-0 +6 3 7 2 3 1 1 0 3 10 
  P. Pierce F 39:47 9-17 0-2 1-2 +4 0 8 2 2 1 1 1 5 19 
  K. Garnett F 35:12 12-23 1-1 1-2 +1 0 12 4 0 2 1 0 3 26 
 Bench Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  T. Allen 18:04 4-7 0-2 3-4 -15 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 11 
  L. Powe 13:23 1-3 0-0 0-0 -11 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 1
  G. Davis 12:48 0-1 0-0 2-2 -8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
  E. House 9:30 2-2 1-1 0-0 -13 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Totals 44-87 3-11 8-11 8 39 28 11 7 3 3 20 99

Comment 84 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

exactly

this is reminding me of the year after we let Silas go and another year the old bullets were just too much for us and the the year walton was out. frankly I am going to have to stop watching for awhile. Can’t blame it on the refs today

by wahz on Feb 8, 2009 3:36 PM EST reply actions  

oh great now we are going to have spurs and laker trolls agree with celts fans who are discouraged

well count me out. Ainge will do something and will have something to prove at playoff time. Someone will have to beat Boston 4 times out of seven. We will see.

by wahz on Feb 8, 2009 3:40 PM EST reply actions  

Just ignore them

If they were that confident about their own teams, they wouldn’t be so concerned with ours.

by agh on Feb 8, 2009 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed.

it’s always easier to tear another team down than to have 100% confidence in your own team.
by the way: i wouldn’t dare read any laker blog because it might ruin the english language for me.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

hmmmm ...

if that is the way you feel, i suggest that you avert your eyes from the comments below made by other fans.

by steveRB on Feb 8, 2009 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

good point.

There are still only 2 or 3 teams capable of beating the Celts 4 out of 7.

"Just do what you do best."
~Red Auerbach

by daveedee36 on Feb 8, 2009 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Tough to watch

This season has been very tough to watch. Seeing the big games lost due to blatantly obvious problems with the bench and sense of urgency. I’m going to stop posting because whatever I write will be the result of my frustration, but all I’ve got to say is that not only does a move need to be made, but our starting 5 needs to start shaping up as well.

by BOSPORTS on Feb 8, 2009 3:45 PM EST reply actions  

consistency

we just aren’t seeing any consistency off the bench. it is troublesome, because the bench matters against teams like the cavs, lakers, and spurs that have at least 1 or 2 “go-to-guys” off their bench. we need this answer, and unfortunately, it’s probably not coming from baby, hous3, or powe. these guys will just have to do what they did last year: sustain and don’t let the other team dominate on both ends of the floor.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Can't say I agree with the "tough to watch" premise

The two seasons that led to a total of 57 wins were tough to watch.

This is still the ride of a lifetime, even on the bad days.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Feb 8, 2009 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Steve's absolutely right

There are so many examples of tougher to watch over the last 20 years. I still almost feel like I’m dreaming to root for a team this good.

If it were easy it wouldn’t mean as much.

by Thruthelookingglass on Feb 8, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Its been the starting 5...

…who have lost the games to the Lakers, Cavs,and now Spurs down the stretch…say what you want about the bench, but Boston’s starting 5 has had each of these games entrusted to them down the stretch in the 4th quarter and its been the OTHER team making the big plays to pull out the win in the last minutes of each game…

The GPA trio isn’t playing huge minutes, so fatigue is not an excuse I can legitimize..the team simply isn’t stepping up and finishing off big games down the stretch – the loss to the Lakers and Spurs recently was a result of not getting stops and failing to convert on the other end – both were victories with one more stop and one more basket over the last minute of the game…

That being said, series play is different from single-game play and Boston has shown that it can hang with any team – the difference is that last season, nobody could hang with them, so the team has clearly lost some ground to their true peers..

by BillfromBoston on Feb 8, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Bottom line - we need some new blood...

PJ – Please, please, please come out of retirement one more time.

James Dolan – Please, please, please come to terms with Stephon.

by lovethecees on Feb 8, 2009 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

We need rest, consistency and some help off the bench

by TheAncientRivalry on Feb 8, 2009 3:50 PM EST reply actions  

3 things need to happen

1) The C’s need to make a move. Marbury would be a good move, since it is only till the end of this season. He has always been great when he first goes to a new team.

2) PLEASE no more House/T Allen combo. It just doesn’t work. House was playing so well with Pruitt out there. When something isn’t broken, you don’t try to fix it.

3) They need to work at getting Pierce more open, getting more set plays in for him and generally not making him have to work so hard for his points. I know other team’s defenses are geared to stop him, but that Is the same case for LeBron, Kobe, Wade etc.. and NONE of them have to work so hard just to get a decent look at the hoop.

They need to space the floor better, run him some double screens like they do Ray and try to start setting him up in an iso on the wings every now and then like they used to.

by agh on Feb 8, 2009 3:52 PM EST reply actions  

House Pruitt works because there is a good ball handler at the point. TA and House are both iffy ball handlers. Pruitt and House works well, and though I don’t like TA, I’d like to see Pruitt with Allen too. Pruitt’s not a big numbers guy but he does make the second unit run much smoother.

by liamail on Feb 8, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

As long as it’s not both House and TA at the same time. I like steak and peanut butter, just not in the same dish.

by agh on Feb 8, 2009 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Doc has to shake up the bench

This rigid nine-man rotation isn’t working. Get either Gabe or POB in there and make everyone earn their minutes. If Tony or Powe or Baby are stinking it up, SIT THEM AND BRING IN SOMEONE ELSE. Look at the +/- stats. Rondo missed too many shots, but 16 assists and the rest of the starters played well enough to win.

Also, how the hell does Doc not realize that House is neutralized when he has to run the point? IT’S NOT A COINCIDENCE THAT HOUSE’S HOT STREAK CAME WHEN GABE WAS GETTING MINUTES. We have a potential 20+ point spot-up shooter off the bench and we’re wearing him out running the point. Inexcusable.

by joebianca on Feb 8, 2009 3:57 PM EST reply actions  

Great point

Eddie is a great shooter when just dished the ball, not when he has to dribble and shoot.

Teams simply aren’t afraid of the Celtics and losses like this don’t help. I honestly believe that every team feels they have a legit chance to beat us.

by BOSPORTS on Feb 8, 2009 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, the bench was missing.

The +/- for the bench is awful today.Hustle was there but didn’t execute very well. Not sure why Gabe didn’t get any burn…don’t like Powe & BBD together either. A 2-3 ration of starters with bench players works. 1-4 doesn’t because whoever the one starter is, gets ignored most of the time. I don’t know how many times you see House/Allen jacking up/forcing shots with Ray wide open on the wing. Plus keeping two starters in, usually keeps defensive intensity up where it belongs.

On a side note, the Cavs/Lakers are on, and I think it’s interesting that when they sit starters, the run plays specifically for the starter(s) still on the floor. Boston still runs plays as if all 5 starters are on the floor. Go with you scorer and let the other guys play off him and the adjustments the other team makes…just saying.

"Just do what you do best."
~Red Auerbach

by daveedee36 on Feb 8, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

An aberration. Hope it doesn’t happen again. All in all, a good game by both teams. Not panicking (sorry trolls, lol ).

by thirstyboots18 on Feb 8, 2009 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

I respect the Spurs. It was an exciting game. I say let’s return the favor next time in San Antonio.

by Thruthelookingglass on Feb 8, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

No worries

This loss doesn’t bother me all that much. Mistakes in the final minute are what sealed the loss for us. If we had played tighter defense overall throughout the rest of the game we’d be celebrating a victory right now, but that’s just an effort issue.

Oh, and don’t forget the silver lining of losing to quality teams like the Spurs and Lakers . . . they’ll be full of false confidence if they meet us in the Finals.

by rrc589 on Feb 8, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not just the bench

The starters blew it in this game. Rondo and Pierce both missed easy layups, and Ray missed virtually all of his key shots, going 1-5 for 3s. Refs were overall ok in this game, if anything shading their calls a bit to the Celtics’ side (though TA did NOT travel on that key turnover near the end).

Of course, Powe sucked, Baby sucked. But it’s beyond me why Doc didn’t play Eddie more considering how hot he has been. He took only 2 shots, made them both.

But the starters blew this one. They just didn’t execute.

I like the Spurs in the West… they may well end up in the finals. Will the Celtics? I don’t know.

by DRJ1 on Feb 8, 2009 4:04 PM EST reply actions  

the laker game and this game were big tests for us and we failed. not sure what else to say except this sucks. we played like crap against the knicks but pulled it out but in close games against good teams like the lakers and spurs we couldn’t get it done. that’s very disheartening

by Red2 on Feb 8, 2009 4:11 PM EST reply actions  

hey the good news is that the lakers and spurs have to play one another. the bead news is that unless we start playing better we’re not coming out of the east

by Red2 on Feb 8, 2009 4:12 PM EST reply actions  

Spurs = tougher matchup than Lakers

If we are lucky enough to somehow get past the Cavs and back into the Finals, I firmly like our chances better vs. the Fakers than vs. the solid Spurs. Congrats to the Spurs who stepped up while Ray Allen choke on the in-bounds pass.

by Smitty77 on Feb 8, 2009 4:13 PM EST reply actions  

Losing to Spurs better than losing to Fakers

So you would rather lose to the Spurs than to the Fakers? Of course that is assuming you aren’t made losers by the Cavs first. This week you got your wish and lost to both. Congrats.

by steveRB on Feb 9, 2009 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It's strange

that Danny wasn’t aggressive in improving the bench in the off season. It seems he put incredible hope in the team just improving based on the fact that they’d played together for a year. It’s as if everyone else knew our bench was poor but we didn’t and we were fighting through to say ‘i told you so’. Whatever his hope was, it didn’t work out as planned and we’re slowly becoming the worst of the contending teams. It will be very hard for the Celtics to do any serious damage in the playoffs with this current squad.

by BOSPORTS on Feb 8, 2009 4:16 PM EST reply actions  

The team made offers to multiple veteran FA...

…they just didn’t value spending big money or big years to have mediocre upgrades – every off-season isn’t isolated as its own entity, this FA off-season is more lucrative in terms of vets, they will be more agressive with their offers this time around…

Remember, if you sign a guy for 2-3 years and 3-4 million per, you are locked into that guy as your player…Boston wasn’t going to match the offers for the guys they were interested in…its good business…there is still time to add veterans off the waiver wire – just like last year…

by BillfromBoston on Feb 8, 2009 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

the not ready for prime time guys lost again but the effort was there and the refs did ok. i do like san antone and they played great and their subs and bonner killed us. kg played a great game and rondo distributed. ray’s errors were big but the guy was busting his chops. we need some help danny and we need a reinvigorated bench. points well taken about eddie at the point but we have lost gabe in the shuffle . he needs some minutes in the upcoming games because he is green but lost on the bench. i hope scal is ready. perk finally looked like the good old perk.

by nazzbo on Feb 8, 2009 4:26 PM EST reply actions  

Bench continues to be inconsistent, but we still should have won...

But we just didn’t get the breaks down the stretch. KG’s jumper’s in-and-out, Ray’s layup rolls off the rim, meanwhile on the other end Bonner gets the friendly bounce on a jumper and Mason bangs home an open three (after getting a nice illegal screen from Duncan). Then the terrible inbounds play, followed by the highly questionable clear path foul (Pierce was even with Manu when he fouled him…check the replay), and we’re down 6 all of a sudden.

I’d really like to see Gabe moved to full-time backup point guard. Eddie continues to struggle when asked to play point. Even in the games where he’s making shots and playing point, the damage his point guard play does the overall ball movement is not enough to make up the difference. Same with TA, who has better skills than Eddie but still does the same damage to the overall ball movement. Doc needs to put these guys in positions where their strengths are highlighted and weaknesses hidden, but playing them together with Eddie at 1 and TA at 2 ends up highlighting their weaknesses, limiting Eddie’s open looks (and forcing him into off-the-dribble jumpers) and making TA handle the ball too much.

TA did have a good game today, cordobes, though he was lost a little on the defensive end in the first half, like most of the Cs. But he otherwise attacked the rim, got to the line, hit the offensive boards, played within himself and fed the post pretty well. The traveling call on him was GARBAGE.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 8, 2009 4:33 PM EST reply actions  

I AGREE, THE REFS COST THE CELTICS THE GAME

(sounds eerily familiar to A LOT of recent comments on this site)…

by nba is the worst on Feb 8, 2009 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Scal was playing well enough on d as usual, moving the ball

and had shot so well that his 3% was up to 37%! Its bizarre but this hurt us the last two games, games that matter a lot for home court

The fact that da is waiting so long means he is either getting someone out of retirement again, waiting for the released players(buyouts). We know from the owner that they know they need players

by wahz on Feb 8, 2009 4:34 PM EST reply actions  

is it just me?

but I have this feeling that we have become a team that is capable of beating those lesser teams with ease and just struggle to win games against the big guns….

hopefully these losses would be loud enough to warn ainge or doc to do something to the bench or add a LEGIT back up BIG

PLEASE>>>>

by hiro on Feb 8, 2009 5:13 PM EST reply actions  

Spoiled Team Wrecker overpaid Thug Marbury NOT needed. Keep the Faith

To the guy who is professing we need Fartbury Starbury (and other people who keep suggesting when need Marbury) really make me wonder how long you have watched the NBA. Good Lord go watch the KG story on NBAtv playing lately and see how Marbury and KG had the world by the tail in Minny and suddenly Marbury turns into Ron Artest’s pouting little brother. Oh wait …..you guys probably wanted Artest too a few years back on the Celtics. Marbury is poison and every team who ever made the mistake of trading for him can vouch for that.

Perhaps we need new blood (I personally say NO) unless McHale is making a comeback in Boston. Let the trade deadline pass unless Scali can be traded for who he was supposed to really be about 12 million dollars ago – Matt Bonner.

Have faith!!!! It ain’t even the All-Star break. You whiners stay out of my foxhole!.

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Feb 8, 2009 5:35 PM EST reply actions  

It’s a bit of a reach to call Ginobili a bench player. It’s along the lines of calling Havlicek or McHale bench players.

The Spurs are coming out of the West. They will be tough for anybody in the finals. They’ll beat the Lakers in 6. They’re obviously not afraid to play on the road. Popovich is willing to rest his big three for entire games. If there’s a blowout either way, he pulls them early. Our’s are playing into the fourth quarter of 30 point blowouts. Rivers needs to follow the Popovich model. I’d much rather have a rested 2-seed than a gassed top seed. The Spurs had more in the tank down the stretch of this game.

Marbury is an instant ticket to dissention and a first round or second round exit. There’s a very good reason that D’Antoni doesn’t want him anywhere near a basketball court. Actually, I’m sure there’s lots of reasons he doesn’t want the piece of garbage around one. Brown is old and will not be able to keep coming back after that long out of basketball.

One of the most poignant things Hubie Brown pointed out in the telecast was how good Popovich is at developing a bench. It looks like Rivers is trying to do the same thing. He could do a lot better job of it by doing what Popovich does in blowout games. Unless the perfect player comes forth, Pierce, Allen, and Garnett should be playing little more than 25 minutes in the 30+ point blowouts or should alternately sit out 1-2 of those games this season. Davis has shown he can play a solid 25 minutes. It’s nice to have PJ’s length. But he’s no more a shotblocker than Davis. Let your bench develop, Rivers.

by Finkelskyhook on Feb 8, 2009 5:42 PM EST reply actions  

Bench Opps

The bench won’t be able to come up big in BIGBIGBIGBIG games unless they get the chance. Playing 6 minutes in the 2nd and at the beginning of the 4th isn’t going to teach them. Doc needs to mix up the line-ups more: in the 2nd and in the beginning of the 4th, mix up starters with bench players. I posted an idea below (Ray coming off the bench) that I am not crazy about, but it does a few things: gives Eddi3 the chance to play off guard, gives Pruitt to be on the court with an actual scorer (Ray), and gives the second unit someone they know the offense has to go through. Read more below!

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

As hard as it is to admit

Right now, the Lakers are the best team in the NBA. No Bynum, Kobe with the flu and they easily beat the Cavs today and completely shut down James. In my opinion, Phil Jackson, who I despise, did a masterful job of coaching the past two games. Just glad there are still about 30 games left, because the Lakers are gaining tremendous confidence right now.

by vinnie on Feb 8, 2009 6:00 PM EST reply actions  

Too bad they are playing their best now, they better hope it continues through the playoffs.

by NoraG1 on Feb 8, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Masterful job?

I don’t know if I’d say that.
I hate to say this, I really really really hate to say this, but Lamar Odom is the reason they are winning right now. He is playing out of his mind. He is playing the kind of ball that other teams (Clips, MIA) had hoped for. I hate this guy. I think he is overrated and just a guy that runs his mouth and rides the good players on his team (Gasol, Kobe)… but, I’ll give him his props at the moment: the dude is playing well.

He is actually playing decent defense, crashing the offensive boards, taking the ball hard to the hoop, and lordy even hitting mid-range jumpers. I don’t know what has gotten into him, but I still can’t imagine this play will keep up.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

well

relying on odom to come through in the playoffs seems to favor every team except the Lakers

by agh on Feb 8, 2009 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

That is why

We like Odom’s run now. Odom is like a a box of matches: only so many strikes before you’ve got NOTHIN’ left. Good to see he’s lighting things up now, while the Lakers will be in the dark later on.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 9, 2009 6:42 AM EST up reply actions  

PS

There is a reason that he’s never been an All-Star, and never will be: he is nothing near consistent and tends to choke when it counts.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 9, 2009 6:44 AM EST up reply actions  

PJ Brown is the biggest chip we have!

What’s to keep Danny from signing PJ to the same dollar value contract of let’s say a Camby or Shaq. PJ signs the contract, gets traded, makes the pro rated amount for the rest of the season, while staying home if he wants. Phoenix or LA get out from their obligation a year early.

I’m not saying these two players but isn’t PJ the best chip we have?

by Little D on Feb 8, 2009 6:08 PM EST reply actions  

peaking

let the lakers peak now.
we need to upgrade our bench our it will be cavs vs lakers.
Tony allen is running out of chances.
Eddie house is a spot up shooter.
WE NEED A legit big who can hit a short J.
Otherwise we still are pretty good.

by tommyfan on Feb 8, 2009 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

Horrible defense by Garnett and Pierce in the second quarter. That’s when the game was lost. Kevin Garnett was torched by Matt Bonner. Unbelievable.

by Brickowski on Feb 8, 2009 6:20 PM EST reply actions  

Yes, because the games was out of reach in the 2nd quarter and Celtic’s had no chance of winning in the 4th. Give me a break.

by NoraG1 on Feb 8, 2009 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Had they played well in the last 6 minutes of the second quarter they would have won the game. They also played poorly for the first 4 minutes of the 4th quarter, but it was the second quarter that kuilled them. Sure, they pulled even late in the game, but it’s a game of spurts, and the Spurs were due at the end.

by Brickowski on Feb 8, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Horrible defense by Garnett and Pierce in the second quarter. That’s when the game was lost. Kevin Garnett was torched by Matt Bonner. Unbelievable.

Uhhh, you mean Garnett and Perkins????
Pierce’s defense was just fine. He and Ray took turrns on Finley, Ginobili & Mason in the second Finley got nothing and Mason & Ginoboli were each 1 of 2 in the quarter. Ginobili got most of his points in the 1st quarter when he was guarded by Ray exclusively. There was horrible miscommunication between Perkins and Garnett. As a result Bonner was getting wide open shots. Bonner was 6-7 and Duncan was 2-2 with 4 free throws in the second quarter.
Hill also killed us in the fourth and it wasn’t just House that had a problem with him, Rondo did too.

Pierce pretty much locked Ginoboli down in the fourth, If not for the gifts at the free throw line because of Ray’s bad inbounds pass he’d have had nothing.

http://popcornmachine.net/cgi-bin/gameflow.cgi?date=20090208&game=SASBOS

by Jaycelt on Feb 9, 2009 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd also like to add

 Perkins made another critical defensive error which resulted in the Mason 3 pointer tht put the Spurs ahead.
His man set a pick on Ray and Perkins never came out and showed. If he had he Mason would have at least had a hand in his face ont the shot.

by Jaycelt on Feb 9, 2009 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd like to add

That the pick Duncan set on Ray was the EXACT kind that Perkins always picks up fouls setting…Timmy turned his shoulder into Ray just as Ray was coming across the screen, giving Mason the clean look. But you’re right, Perk needs to show on that pick.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 9, 2009 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I still say if a team has a chance to win in the end, the 2nd quarter can’t be blamed completely as the reason the Celtics lost.

by NoraG1 on Feb 8, 2009 7:11 PM EST reply actions  

Crazy idea

Aggressive, confident coaches take calculated risks— such as coaches that that go for 3 when down 2 in the final seconds of a game (read: Doc and the Celts giving Ray the ball for a tres v. the 76ers).

What if we shook up the starting line-up? What about starting Hous3 over Ray Allen? What if Ray Allen (stay with me) played with the second unit. This would ENSURE that the offense went through him. He would pretty much get as many shots as he wanted, and would be the primary go-to for the second unit. On the other end, Hous3 would get to be on the floor at the same time as a real ball handler (our boy Rondo), and he could try to get a rhythm going of moving without the ball to free up for a shot. Ray would still get his minutes, but just be the court general for the second unit. He would still get his 35-40 minutes, just wouldn’t get the first 8.

Look, I am just throwing something out there. That second unit is inconsistent, and there is not a single player on that unit that can take over the game. Ray is a different player— he has proved that he can adjust to changes. He can spot up, he can take the ball to the rim, he can play pretty solid defense. Why not put an all-star (9 time, BTW) as your 6th man? Rip Hamilton is always going to suck as a 6th man because he doesn’t get it or buy into Coach Curry’s thinking. Ginobli, however, has bought into his role because he just wants to win— that and Coach Pop is trusted. All it will take is to say “Ray, we want to try this to see if it works.”

I don’t even know if I buy it myself as I write it, but worth a shot? Don’t great teams take risks?? This is a great team. I am not sounding the alarm here, simply saying why not reshuffle the deck instead of throwing it out.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 7:14 PM EST reply actions  

Second unit doesn't really matter

There won’t be a second unit in the playoffs.

There’s a reason why House has never been close to be a starter in this league: he’s extremely undersized for his natural position. That’s why it’s so complicated to pair him with a PG like Rondo, for example. And House is the typical energy guy from the bench, doesn’t make sense to play him with the starters when there won’t be shots available to him,

by cordobes on Feb 8, 2009 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Second unit doesn't really matter??

Seriously? Whoa. I didn’t realize that a 31, 32, and 33 year old could log 48 minutes for 4 potential rounds in the playoffs.

Come on. The bench matters. A crappy second unit loses leads, and a good second unit holds a lead.

Of course Eddie is small. We all know that. Our whole second unit is small.
A lineup of Rondo, Hous3, Pierce, KG, Perk is on the smaller side (Pierce is small for SF), but whatever. Why is this not worth trying?!?!??

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

They’ll play a 8 men rotation in the playoffs. Maybe a 9th guy in some games. But the starters will remain on the floor as much as possible. Of court the bench matters, don’t confuse things. In the playoffs, you won’t have 5 bench players, or even 4 bench players, playing together. At most, you’ll have 3 and it won’t be for a lot of minutes.

Why isn’t worth trying? I presented the reasons: House is a player made to come off the bench and fire shots (something he won’t be able to do when starting) and Rondo+House is a bad pair, I mean, who do you want defending Joe Johnson, Mike Dunleavy, Michael Pietrus, Rip Hamilton, Vince Carter, etc? Eddie House? Rajon Rondo? I understand the concept, but in this case, it doesn’t make sense.

by cordobes on Feb 8, 2009 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Right on...

Boston went with its “regular season” rotation again tonight for whatever reason – they had been using a playoff-style lineup previous to this game and with good results – I don’t know why Doc decided to go back to the 4 bench/1 starter lineups recently, but they reduce the effectiveness of this team…

Come playoff time, the mix will be much more like the 12 game winning streak…

by BillfromBoston on Feb 8, 2009 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Good Idea, Wrong Player

TA is the obvious choice to start if we decide to bench Ray Allen.

Of course, Doc would never in a million years put Ray Allen on the bench. Ray would have to go to Doc for the idea to work and I’m pretty sure that’s not going to happen.

The most obvious idea is to play a point guard at point guard all the time.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 8, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

TA

TA is a better thought. Anything. Just mix anything up.
Please. Doc. Can you hear me? Please.

I know Doc wouldn’t bench Ray. That is why Pierce and KG and Ray needs to say it.
Or Rondo.

Or me. Please. Doc?

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

"Just mix anything up"

Because playing .792 ball screams for change?

Sure, the team has flaws, and it is going to need to fix at least some of those by the time spring comes. But the points cordobes and Bill make above about the rotation in the playoffs are valid, and no matter what, just because a team isn’t perfect doesn’t mean there’s a need to go nuclear.

We lost two tough games this week to teams that we could see down the road. I understand the tendency to react, but I think the sound-the-alarm tone here is a bit much for me.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Feb 8, 2009 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

This is crazy talk!

Ray is the most consistent guy we have had out there on the floor and benching him is the dumbest thing we’ve come up with on here in a long while. Especially to put TA in there in his place?!

Don’t let TA’s 11 points fool you tonight. Once again he proved tonight what many of us were saying all along. His defense is WAY over rated. He is a gambler on defense and sometimes it pays off because he can get back into the play due to his athleticism. Tonight he kept trying to cheat the lanes and got burned on a few plays.

by EJPLAYA on Feb 8, 2009 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

If, Then

All I said was that IF you were going to bench Ray Allen for somebody, THEN the obvious player would be Tony Allen. But don’t let reading comprehension get in the way of your righteous indignation.

As for TA’s defense, yes, he had a bad day today. TA got caught backdoor, was a half-step late on a few steal attempts, etc… The thing is, you could say that about the ENTIRE team in the first half. Doc noted at half time that the Cs had given up 16 point (!) off backdoor passes in the first half. That’s just bad defense and it was not limited to TA alone. It was a team-wide lack of defense.

TA still grades out as one of the best, if not the best, individual defenders on the Cs.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 8, 2009 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Look

It was an idea. Not all ideas will be great, but you cannot say that the bench has been a strength during any significant stretch this season. Obviously they won’t play 5 off the bench in the playoffs, I am not dumb— I know there will be an 8-9 man rotation for limited minutes.

But any team with a weak bench loses in the playoffs, even if it is only 3-4 guys coming off the bench. You are also counting on the fact that starters will being their A-game to EVERY playoff game, and see the minutes they deserve. Again, not true. Bench players become important because you need consistency— you don’t need bench players to take control of games, but you do need bench players to not turn the ball over, make that extra pass, make good decisions, play smart defense, and hustle. We are not seeing these things on a consistent basis.

I am not saying bench Ray Allen because that would be fun. I am simply saying, would this do anything to help the Celts win. If it doesn’t, then that is why I am not the Celtics’ head coach.

That is also why you are not the Celtics head coach. We have the luxury of sitting back and playing revisionist history, asking silly questions, and arguing all day.

For anyone here that thinks the bench doesn’t really matter in the playoffs, you’ve obviously never really paid attention to 6,7 games series in the playoffs and you’ve probably never coached yourself. If you rely on your starting 5 only, you’ll get toasted. Maybe not in a game, but certainly in a tight series.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 9, 2009 6:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Insults aside...

because we know when you are called on something you can’t defend you lead back with an insult at the poster, this is still crazy talk.

Why not start it saying IF we benched the entire starting 5, then we should start… You don’t bench the only guy on your team, and when someone starts something that ridiculous calling them on it doesn’t mean they don’t know how to comprehend what they are reading.

As far as TA goes, yes the entire team was playing poor defense, but if you watch closely you will see that TA does that almost ALL the time. He does not play good position defense and because of that I have always maintained that he is an above average defender at best. He could be a great defender if he played smart defense. It really doesn’t matter how you “grade him out”.

by EJPLAYA on Feb 9, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

You still don't understand IF, THEN statements, do you?

It wasn’t my idea, buddy. I just said, IF that idea is going to fly, THEN TA is the obvious choice. But I’m not a big fan of the idea, I don’t think it’s realistic and after watching Doc for 5 years I know he’ll never ever do it. But, in the hypothetical world where it’s possibly happening, then it should be TA, that’s all I’m saying… that’s where the reading comprehension comes in, as in you attack me for suggesting we replace Ray for TA when in fact I just suggested that IF we were going to replace Ray for anyone, THEN it should be TA and not House. But, see, you didn’t understand that, because first you attacked the idea that Ray should be benched and then proceeded to say that if was even stupider to replace him with TA….

All I was saying is that TA as opposed to Eddie was the more logical choice to start for Ray IF that eventuality came about. I didn’t endorse the eventuality, I was just humoring the hypothetical suggestion.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 9, 2009 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

You know you are quite insulting in your posts...

Is there any way you can accomplish the same thing without sounding like a demeaning snob about it?! If not then maybe you shouldn’t lecture people on writing and comprehension. If you are doing it intentionally just to be a jerk then stop already. No one is on here to be insulted time and time again just for you to think you have won your argument…

by EJPLAYA on Feb 9, 2009 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Did Danny Ainge...

… simply roll the dice and play it relatively cheap this offseason hoping to start saving money either for a big free-agent bonanza in a couple years OR re-sign the Rondos of this team? I dunno. All I do know is, and sorry to belabor the point, our bench is not a championship-caliber bench.
I hope Danny can add at least one piece before the trade deadline, but this bench just can’t do the trick. I do think there’s enough of a season left for Big Baby, Powe and TAllen to improve, but I remain dubious that they’ll improve enough to make this bench a title-saver. I pray I’m wrong, though.

by Big_Easy on Feb 8, 2009 7:18 PM EST reply actions  

“What if Ray Allen (stay with me) played with the second unit. This would ENSURE that the offense went through him” Hm. Rays handle not that great. Needs to play off the ball.

by Tenacious D on Feb 8, 2009 7:20 PM EST reply actions  

No No.

Ray is still playing off-guard. Gabe Pruitt gets PT at point guard, so it is a smaller unit:

Pruitt, Ray, TA, Baby, Powe.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

The offense going through a player

means the ball touches his hands on offense; it doesn’t mean that he brings up the ball.

My rambles: http://nbawithoutcable.wordpress.com

by jontookem on Feb 8, 2009 7:25 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah...

It’s pretty obvious to me that if we had an actual point guard for the second unit playing (ie. Pruitt) then we would have a tremendously more effective bench. That’s a fact. I can’t believe how dumb Doc is benching Pruitt and having Eddie play pg. It’s utterly ridiculous. It’s just another example of why Doc really isn’t the greatest coach to have and can really be detrimental to us during games. I know he’s great at managing the players but his strategy on the floor is seriously lacking.

by schiftya2 on Feb 8, 2009 8:21 PM EST reply actions  

If we can't land Marbury

Then we should call up McHale and grab Rashad McCants, as he is on the block. We need more scoring off of the bench, and he is a solid offensive player.

by Tradetime on Feb 8, 2009 9:56 PM EST reply actions  

If McCants can’t break the lineup of a lottery team, how does that make him a player on a championship contender?

by iowa plowboy on Feb 8, 2009 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Just bad luck today

Allen’s finger roll just a little short – would’ve put the C’s up 5 with 50 seconds. Then, Mason’s prayer of a 3 goes, and Allen does something on the inbounds he’s probably never done in his career. Then, the BS clear path foul. That combination of stuff is like 1 in 1,000. Just plain bad luck at the end there. Sometimes stuff happens.

by libermaniac on Feb 9, 2009 1:46 AM EST reply actions  

Marbury....

Def isnt the answer to your problem…Unless PJ Brown and James Posey comes walking through you doors, you will not repeat. Glen Davis and Tony Allen arent the solution. Right now I dont even see you guys getting past Cleveland and if Jameer Nelson was healthy, I think you wouldnt have a chance against Orlando as well.

by Dbrewst2 on Feb 9, 2009 2:41 AM EST reply actions  

not exactly

i wont disagree with the Cleveland bit… but Orlando… we have no problem beating them

come on please add another big man PLEASE

by hiro on Feb 9, 2009 8:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
my turn on rondo..
Small
No Trade
Small
center trade
Small
The Importance of the 6th Seed
Small
Debunking the "Build around Rondo" myth
Imagesca5vwn2y_small
Don't Worry
J0382610_small
Danny Ainge will have to trade Bass et al in exchange of . . .
Small
Why it makes no sense to blow this team up
Small
New CBA, contracts, and opt-outs
I_want_to_believe_small
The Reality of Rondo

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi