Lack of Ariza Suspension Sends Wrong Message
A Daily Babble Production
This is not about whether Trevor Ariza and the Lakers are dirty.
As Jeff noted yesterday, we've had more than enough discussion of the 'D' word around here lately. My conceptualization of dirty play has to do with malicious intent. I'm not a psychoanalyst, and I don't profess to know what went through Treovr Ariza's head when he incited a mini-skirmish and sent an opponent to the hospital by knocking Rudy Fernandez to the floor on a fast break Monday night in Portland.
I'm also not sure it matters.
Here's what we do know: Fernandez was headed to the basket unimpeded. Ariza came up from behind, wound up with his right arm and took a swing. That swing caught the airborne Fernandez's head and knocked him to the floor. The video linked above demonstrates this beyond doubt with the replay that starts at the 1:20 mark.
Regardless of what Ariza was trying to hit - ball or head - that swing is the problem here.
I'm on the liberal side when it comes to allowing hard fouls without turning every collision into a flagrant or an ejection. The idea of working to prevent easy buckets makes sense. In a contact sport, there will be bruising sometimes, and that's okay.
Taking an out-of-control swing up around the area of someone's skull isn't. That's a dangerous play that goes beyond the bounds of simple contact. That isn't trying to get an arm up to contest a shot or merely make an innocent effort at a block. It's a low-percentage play with the chance to do serious damage if it hits the wrong target.
Not suspending Ariza for the foul on Monday night sends a simple message to the players: Taking a wind-up swing at another player as long as the ball is somewhere nearby will meet limited consequences. If a player manages to get the ball or miss entirely, great for him. If he happens to strike his opponent, he risks getting hit with a flagrant foul and possibly an ejection but little more than that. That's a fairly low-risk proposition for the swinger, particularly in a blowout in which his presence for the rest of the game may not be all that integral.
This isn't meant as advocacy of the NBA further softening how it permits its employees to play defense. But the idea of protecting players' heads isn't soft. As it was, Fernandez was fortunate to end up with only a soft tissue injury to his right upper chest area.
The league needs to encourage its players to think twice before taking reckless swings up high on others. Dirty or otherwise, the danger caused by Ariza's play far outweighed the potential reward of blocking the shot. Given Tuesday's ruling of no punishment, the current system leaves the victim at significant risk while failing to transfer said risk to the offender. That's a problem, and it's why Trevor Ariza's hit on Rudy Fernandez merited not only the flagrant 2 he received for unnecessary and excessive contact but a one-game suspension as well.
***
Recommended reading: Jeff linked it yesterday, but I can't help reiterating that TrueHoop's Henry Abbott nailed this one with his commentary on the line between dirty and reckless.
Meanwhile, over at Blazer's Edge, Dave makes a great analogy to the issue of helmet-to-helmet contact in the NFL. My only disagreement comes at the end with Dave's assessment of the league upholding the flagrant as "good enough." As you may have noted above, I don't quite see it that way. As is typically the case with Dave and Ben's work over at the Edge, the piece is a great read and definitely worth your time.
0 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
Furthermore...
I think the league also should have taken into account Ariza’s reaction after the foul.
Brandon Roy admitted that this is what disturbed him most. He said something along the lines of “…my guy is still on the floor and he’s ‘bucking’ at the rest of us.”
If someone makes a legitimate play for the ball (which this in no way was) and has an opponent get their face, they would be taken back.
Ariza was immediately in a defensive, ready to fight, position. Chad Ford also mentioned that Ariza’s big mitsake was his post foul body language.
1 game suspension should be a no brainer.
by huzy on Mar 11, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
+1
Classless response by Ariza, which would have looked even worse in retrospect had Fernandez been more seriously hurt. (We are all fortunate that he wasn’t.)
by The Walker Wiggle on Mar 11, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely agree
Great article. The league is all messed up in terms of incentives.
I’m on the liberal side when it comes to allowing hard fouls without turning every collision into a flagrant or an ejection.
Exactly, me too. But the same league that has the refs calling every little bump or hand-check on an offensive player and calls technicals for every little confrontation is simultaneously allowing this kind of dangerous fouls, who one day will eventually hurt someone seriously, go away with little punishment.
This is one area where I think the NBA could learn with the European basketball – the game in Europe is way more physical and refs allow much more contact; but players don’t escape without a suspension from fouls like this one.
Money quote:
This isn’t meant as advocacy of the NBA further softening how it permits its employees to play defense. But the idea of protecting players’ heads isn’t soft.
by cordobes on Mar 11, 2009 1:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’ve got to agree, he took a swing. That’s all that matters in my opinion, you can say he went for the ball, but ultimately, Rudy’s head was between the ball and Ariza’s arm and he should have been able to see that. He wound up and swung, he should have at least a 1 game suspension.
by MBz on Mar 11, 2009 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Timing
Ariza was completely out of the play,and didn’t have enough recovery time to make a clean play on the ball…another thing is the timing of it happening makes me as a fan think it was out of frustration more so than trying to make a clean play on the ball.If the score was close and time was running out for the Lakers,i might see a player taking the chance making that particular play.Bottomline is, i would hate to see plays like this being dealt with the same way in the upcoming playoffs?
by house_call on Mar 11, 2009 2:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is the Lakers definition of Getting Tougher...
Yet they still don’t play defense or box out or take charges. Thier coaching staff and team seems to think that delivering more cheap shots is the definition of toughness.
We have seen it all year from Kobe, elbowing Roy (and others) in the ribs before cuts and against us when he took that shot at Rondo’s midsection on a loose ball that led to an altercation. We saw Bynum collapse a dude’s lung with and show no remorse whatsoever. And now we have this completely unnecesary play by Ariza, followed by Ariza acting like a prize fighter after a knockout.
The league is turning a blind eye to quite a body of work, imho.
by D Dub on Mar 11, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
just saw the clip.
looks like he went for the ball. The fall made it look worse than it was.
I could be wrong though coz i only saw it from one camera angle in the replay i saw and that’s what it looked like.
You shouldn’t worry about what kind of message it sends though. Players around the league know that Ariza would have gotten suspended if he didn’t play on the Lakers and any player from any other team but the Lakers would get suspended for a play like this.
by celticsmaniac on Mar 11, 2009 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, looked like he got a little ball after winding up and swinging his forearm through Rudy's head.
No place in the league for that play. You can break up the shot without winding up and violently swinging at someones head.
A suspension here should have been a no-brainer for the league.
by D Dub on Mar 11, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not true
Big Baby didnt get suspended. You have to look at the play and like you said, he went for the ball. Where is the cause for suspension?
by birdiejoe on Mar 11, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you read the piece, joe?
I spent several paragraphs outlining it above. Yet you haven’t really addressed that in any of your several comments beyond claiming that Ariza was going for the ball. Which is at least hard to know for certain.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Mar 11, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
on an unrelated note
is it possible for us to change our user names?
From now on I would like to be called “sickcelticsmaniac” “deviantcelticsmaniac”
by celticsmaniac on Mar 11, 2009 2:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wrongdoing
Great Article. As you said, I’m not a Dr. in Physocology. But I perceived wrongdoing in his act. To add on the conversation, Rudy made a key 3-point shot moments before
by CelticsMeansPride on Mar 11, 2009 3:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I was thinking minimum five games. And Odom gets a one game suspension for walking a few steps farther than he should?
by The Real Large James 2 on Mar 11, 2009 3:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The League’s turning into soccer, let it all go, but going by the standard that’s been put in place these days, he should get a game or two.
by davemonsterband on Mar 11, 2009 3:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Looked like an accident to me. Good "no call"
The tape included above looks to me like Ariza wasn’t going to let a breakaway just happen. He was coming from behind and the arm swing was about all he could manage. “No easy baskets”, remember! Looks to me like Fernadez was hurt by the hard landing, not the head slap. Rondo takes those hits often, at one speed or another. The Lakers…known to us as Fakers….need some toughness and that’s what Ariza supplied.
Dickie Bavetta can drive me crazy but he would have seen to a suspension if he thought the play was intended to injure. I don’t want that type of effort “Stern-ed out” of the league. No one wants anyone else to be hurt but its a man’s league and there should be no easy baskets.
by Wildblu1 on Mar 11, 2009 3:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Disagree
Should Ariza have used the “who wants summa this” body language after the foul? No, but if “classless body language” is suspension-worthy, then this league should be destroyed.
Was the foul worthy of a suspension? No, absolutely not. It looked a lot worse than it really was. That was one of those plays where Ariza made a play on the ball, but wanted to make sure that ball was sent into the stands. He didn’t try to hurt him or even make a play on Fernandez’s head. He went for the ball. It just so happens that they were both running very fast and Ariza’s swipe (again, at the ball) was forceful. But was it malicious? Not at all.
I wonder what you guys’ reaction would have been if Ariza wasn’t a Laker… or better yet, if he made this play as a Celtic.
Go Celtics! Go Hoyas!
by CelticBalla32 on Mar 11, 2009 3:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Finally a second post with some sense
I read from the bottom up and Im glad to have reached another post worth reading but 2 out of…….. is a hot mess. I think the refs need to go back and take some refresher courses. Like the last post big Bby didnt deserve a F2 either. Both calls were terrible
by birdiejoe on Mar 11, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
McHale Clotheslines Rambis!!!!
for those of you old enough to remember (I was already old then) but back in the days of the Kurt Rambis beheading by McHale it was just a foul – not even a technical……hahahahaha.
We have become more like figure skating and a lot less like hockey in the NBA. I say it should be a technical foul and that’s it. Flagrant 1, Flagrant 2, suspension blah blah blah – the refs can’t even call three seconds correctly and you expect them to handle this level of sophistication – good lord…. hahahaha. The refs suck this year and so does this whole flagrant rules crap.
Next!!!!!
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Mar 11, 2009 3:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Po's post is a terrific sum-up of the NBA's officiating as directed by Stern.
Different rules for different players. Basic rules of basketball selectively enforced…If enforced at all.
Had Davis or Ariza committed the same fouls on the messiah in Cleveland instead of a role player, they’d be Kermit Washington’d from the NBA. That’s why the Red Sea parts whenever the messiah, without dribbling, can go straight to the hoop using as many steps as he needs to get there.
The lack of consistency in officiating is exactly why Tim Donaghy could do what he did for years without any accountability. He fit right in.
by Finkelskyhook on Mar 11, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Intent has nothing to do with it....
Ariza wound up and swipped hard at Rudy above the shoulders while he was air born. That is a recklous play and he should have been suspended for it. He could have simply extended his arm and grabbed Rudy’s arm to break up the play but he didn’t….he wound up and took a swing. Whenever you try to make a play on an airborne player above his shoulders you have to have some reguard to that players safety which Ariza did not display.
I am from the old school of BBall and let me tell you….Ariza would be hurting the next time he steps on the floor against the Blazers. Don’t get mad….get even!
by IowaGuy on Mar 11, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely correct. That’s what’s missing from this neutered version of the NBA. The Malones, Oakleys, McGinnis, Washingtons, Lucas’ , etc would have taken care of the dirty player.
by Finkelskyhook on Mar 11, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is Ariza’s foul different from Davis’? I looked at both and see little difference except for the fact that Cleveland players immediately came to Varajao’s defense and Portland’s players didn’t. Fernandez was in a more vulnerable position. The right call ultimately was made in both instances.
by Finkelskyhook on Mar 11, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"I looked at both and see little difference except for the fact that Cleveland players immediately came to Varajao’s defense and Portland’s players didn’t."
Did you….um…watch the video?…..with your eyes open?
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 13, 2009 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
everything is different
The two plays are worlds apart. Davis was in front/to the side of AV and AV cut around/beside him. Davis jumped and put his arms out to stop him/block the shot. In one hand he got all ball, in the other hand he got the poodle that AV wears on his head. AV then flopped his way to the ground and popped right back up to get into the ‘fight’.
Ariza attacked an airborne player from behind above the shoulders.
Not to mentions the speed difference at which these two plays took place. AV had about 2 steps of momentum. Rudy had a full court sprint worth of momentum.
by IowaGuy on Mar 11, 2009 3:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
please look at nba rule book for definition of a F2
you could not have been watching the same game… “attacked” when did it become illegal for you to get your shot blocked from the back. The end result was a mere accident. Im glad all these people with the confusion of what a F2 is arent officiating any games in the NBA. your report cards would suck
by birdiejoe on Mar 11, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did in fact do just that
Feel free to take a look at my replication of the rulebook above.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Mar 11, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Taking a wind-up swing at another player as long as the ball is somewhere nearby will meet limited consequences.
I wish that was actually the premise, Professor. The absolute message is more hideous than that. It’s okay when it’s done to a role player. Don’t dare do it to a superstar.
by Finkelskyhook on Mar 11, 2009 3:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WWF
Thats the message im starting to receive from the nba these days…its becoming like the old pro wrestling in feel because the only thing consistent these days is the poor/bad officiating … the sad part about it is,we cant do a darn thing about it.
by house_call on Mar 11, 2009 5:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why don't you switch to WNBA
I want Big Baby’s play and Ariza’s play on my team. No easy layups, period! Ariza did not take a deliberate head shot from the tape I saw. And if he did, he would have been fined, suspended etc. Nowitzki’s elbow to Scal’s head was a more intentional foul than Ariza’s. What we better worry about is if the Lakers have finally grown some balls.
by Wildblu1 on Mar 11, 2009 5:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dont need to Switch
I don’t need to switch to watching the WNBA,i already watch it whenever i can…i have a relatively who plays on one of the better teams in the WNBA.Who are you related to that plays any pro.sports?Probably none because you are so quick to judge others.
by house_call on Mar 21, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep. Ariza is a classless punk, but if I wanted to watch the WNBA, I would. Some of these ridiculous flagrants would hardly have been fouls in the 1980s. You ought to be able to give a hard foul without risking a fine and/or a suspension.
The way to deal with players like Ariza is to resolve the problem the next time he comes down the lane.
by Brickowski on Mar 11, 2009 5:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
youre kidding right
Classless punk, are you serious? How long have you been watching bball? Youre probably a Laker hater! Its either a good call or a bad call. Are you a fan that thinks all the other teams deserve all the calls and yours doesnt? Are you the type of fan that is so much of a groupie you cant call a correct shot…F2 are for when the player makes a play on the person not the ball. If Ariza deserved any type of foul it would have been a PF only! Fair is Fair this is basketball your supposed to compete, each time down the court; no matter the deficit or the lead. Im a KG fan 1st and have been since he stepped on the court as a Twolve. Watching him play in Minnesota he contested everything, he played hard and still does, if he thinks he can make a play hes making it and thats what it all about. If you shoot a ball after the whistle is blown in KGs house, hes snatching it out the air or blocking it. I said all of that to say this. Play hard or dont play at all. Lets remember Livingston and his fall, freak accident and it ended his career. Fernandez didnt even hit his head, he got the wind knocked out of him. Lets really look at the play people
by birdiejoe on Mar 11, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No need for implied personal attacks, joe
I’m not sure the “groupie” comment to Brick is called for.
Meanwhile, I don’t see the relevance of Livingston’s freak accident. It wasn’t precipitated by a swing at his head.
Out of curiosity, since you called out Brick on this issue, what team do you root for?
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Mar 11, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ariza was exposed as a classic punk in his rookie year with the Knicks, when Larry Brown called him out. I think the word Brown used was “delusional.”
by Brickowski on Mar 11, 2009 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wildblu1 word
read my post!! and cheers to you … you lightweights switch to the WNBA!!!
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Mar 11, 2009 7:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ariza Flagrant
Ariza has incredible speed and has made a lot of blocks just like this one this year. He knows he can do it. The true flagrants are when a guy just grabs somebody around the waist from behind or puts a hard shoulder in the body. At the speed they’re moving, a small error can produce contact with the head. They have got ot be able to play some defense. Remember that by going airborne, Ariza also risks injury to himself if he gets tangled up with Fernandez. I think the refs called the F2 to keep the crowd from going crazy. They were out for blood with Fernandez down. Gasol looked truly sad over this whole thing. Rudy is his Spanish National teammate. As others have said, it was the landing, not the blow, that hurt Rudy. When guys launch themselves, anything can happen. Remember the look on Kobe’s face when his baseline tumble took Bynum out for the season…
by celticandlakerfanreally on Mar 12, 2009 1:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL!
Are you kidding me? Ariza barely touched the dude. He got more ball then head. You know what the real problem was? Nobody taught this guy the proper way to fall. He got hurt on the fall and not anything Ariza did..geeze.. Don’t you remember your Celtics of the 80s? Geeze that wasnt a dirty play at all..
by zenmaster2 on Mar 12, 2009 7:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Never said it was dirty
In fact, the lack of relevance of “dirtiness” is clarified in the first line of the piece. I’m unsure if you made it much past that point.
But yeah, it’s the fault of a defenseless airbone player that a guy took a wind-up swing at him from behind.
I’ll be curious to see your reaction if Travis Outlaw makes a similar play on a two-guard of the Lakers next time around.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Mar 12, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Celtics of the 80s didn't play above the rim
If the NBA wants it’s highlight dunks they will continue to call flagrant 2 fouls on plays like this.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 13, 2009 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















