Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

Joe Smith and Drew Gooden Bought Out

Tom Ziller has the rundown:

The excellent Brian Windhorst of the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports that Oklahoma City agreed to waive cagey veteran Joe Smith in time to join a playoff team. Windhorst has sources that call the Cavaliers a lock as Smith's destination.

Drew Gooden, meanwhile, became a surprise addition to the buy-out list. Traded to the Kings a week-and-change ago, Gooden has played only one game in Royal Purple. But the rebuilding Kings have young talent in the frontcourt and no real need to, um, win. Sam Amick of the Sacramento Bee first reported the possibility of a buy-out Saturday; it happened just an hour before the midnight Eastern deadline. San Antonio looks like a potential landing place.

But a team with no shot at either -- the Boston Celtics -- might be the biggest story out of the last-minute buy-outs

UPDATE: According to David Aldridge, Smith wanted to sign in Boston, but those talks are dead now.

Poll
Did Ainge make a mistake signing Mikki Moore so quickly?
Yes
1027 votes
No
1021 votes

2048 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 65 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Smith wanted to sign in Boston...

http://www.nba.com/2009/news/03/01/gooden.smith/index.html?rss=true

I’ll trust David Aldridge, maybe the best NBA reporter in the business.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 2, 2009 9:27 AM EST reply actions  

...

We made a HUGE mistake…

by Marqui on Mar 2, 2009 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I concur

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 2, 2009 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

And it’s the consequence of a bad off-season – that lead to Ainge being desperate now and not having the luxury of being patient.

by cordobes on Mar 2, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Could not agree more, Cordobes. This predicament began in July.

by CoachBo on Mar 2, 2009 10:10 PM EST up reply actions  

ugh

not what I needed to hear this morning

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Mar 2, 2009 9:36 AM EST reply actions  

I’ve got to assume that through whatever back-office channels of communications that were being used (that will never be publicly acknowledged lest tampering charges be filed), Smith wasn’t making his intentions of being bought out all that clear. Communications breakdown.

I can’t blame Danny for signing Moore. I like Mikki (I would have liked Smith more), but really, whether we advance past Cleveland or not is going to have a LOT more to do with LeBron vs. Pierce than Joe Smith versus Mikki Moore.

by theBird on Mar 2, 2009 9:38 AM EST reply actions  

Could we still sign him?

A scenario would be to buy out Scal, and sign Smith. Scal is definitely at risk for not playing the rest of the season.

by Silverlock on Mar 2, 2009 9:41 AM EST reply actions  

Whether Scal can play this year or not (or even if – theoretically – he was never cleared to play again), he still has value as an expiring contract. It’s entirely possible we’ve seen the last of Scal in green, since he’ll have a fair amount of value as a trade asset this summer (and especially at next years’ deadline). Basically, if we want to get a deal done, we need his contract.

Pruitt, now, he doesn’t make as much, so there isn’t much of a financial hit. Not sure if he has any guarantees for next season or not. To me, you think about bringing someone else aboard and cutting Pruitt unless you believe he’s going to make the leap. If he’s not part of the future plans anymore, cut bait and get someone else in who can help.

by theBird on Mar 2, 2009 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

dan did what he had to do. one in the hand is better than two in the bush.

by nazzbo on Mar 2, 2009 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

Not really...

When the one in the hand isn’t that good of a player, and the two in the bush are.

Mikki Moore just isn’t a very good player. He’s better than POB, but not anything special otherwise.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 2, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Gooden?

Forgive me if I’m talking crazy here, but since the Cavs have Joe Smith practically locked in, is there any chance we cut somebody and at least get Gooden?

by braz on Mar 2, 2009 10:31 AM EST reply actions  

I don't buy this for a second!

Come on! Joe Smith sat there and kept saying he was happy staying where he was, made no overtures recently to the Celtics that he was going to push for a buyout and wanted to be here over Cleveland. This is all a smokescreen so that he doesn’t make his friends on the C’s feel bad. He had every intention of signing with the Cavs for more money than we could offer him. The second we signed Moore all of a sudden he pushes for the buyout?! Be serious guys. We never had a shot at him in the first place.

by EJPLAYA on Mar 2, 2009 10:39 AM EST reply actions  

I agree. If he really wanted to be in a Celtics uniform, he would have made a move to be bought out earlier.

by braz on Mar 2, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

How could you know that?

How do you know what “overtures” Smith made to the Celtics?

Every report in the media leading up to the deadline was that the Celts were Smith’s first choice. Aldridge is now confirming this.

Maybe that’s all a smokescreen, but there’s absolutely no way of knowing that. Danny seems to have targeted Moore — there’s every possibility that Danny just values Moore higher than Smith and Gooden. That may sound illogical, but Danny makes mistakes as much as everybody else.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 2, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

We sure knew what "overtures" Marbury made to the Celtics

Of course we don’t know 100% what was said, however his actions spoke very loud. When it was about us supposedly he made comments he was happy and not too concerned about being bought out. Now that Cleveland needs him with more cash in hand to give he gets the deal done and changes his tune. Actions have spoken. Had he truly wanted to be here then he would have been here.

You may be right about Danny though. I don’t know that I personally think that Moore is that much worse than Smith at this point, however I would have preferred Smith I think.

by EJPLAYA on Mar 2, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions  

1) Starbury was granted permission to talk to other teams; there is no indication that Smith was;

2) Starbury is known for talking, even when it isn’t necessarily professional and in his team’s best interest. Smith isn’t.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 2, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Can't argue with that.

However there were reports of him talking with our players and we know that if he was all over it that would have found his way to Danny. So either he didn’t really want to be here, or Danny valued Moore over him. Either way I guess it doesn’t matter. I would be all over releasing Gabe though and signing him as well. That would basically sit either Powe or BBD though, so I don’t think that will happen.

by EJPLAYA on Mar 2, 2009 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

To the extent Smith did any talking...

Smith wasn’t exactly mute on the subject in the last week or two. Sure, we don’t know what was said back channel, but to the extent we do know what he said or thought, it was that he was happy with his situation in OKC, and that he was not seeking a buyout.

I don’t know how Danny ranked these potential buyout candidates, but I’m pretty sure he did not want to chance not landing any of them. Unless Danny had other compelling info that Smith wanted and would receive a buyout, I think it was smart of him to not pass on Moore.

by Mencius on Mar 2, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

monday morning quarter-backing going on here.

Mikki Moore is a quick big that can handle the high screen and roll very similar to KG and bother with his length. I feel his a better defender and more athletic than Joe Smith, but Smith is clearly the better offensive player.

But is that what we needed?

by BirdNerd on Mar 2, 2009 10:42 AM EST reply actions  

Moore as a defender...

Moore led the league in personal fouls last year, averages less blocked shots than Brian Scalabrine, and allowed opposing centers to shoot over 60% this year. He is in no way a better defender than Joe Smith.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 2, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

"But a team with no shot at either -- the Boston Celtics -- might be the biggest story out of the last-minute buy-outs"

Maybe its because we already signed our 2 guys? why would that be the biggest story?

And this habitual whining about not signing Joe smith should just stop already…for as bad as you say Mikki Moore is, Joe smith is not much better at this point in his career.
Is it really neccasary to dwell on what you think Ainge should’ve done all the meanwhile ripping the guy he did sign? GET OVER JOE SMITH is all I can say..this is cavs news, not celtics news

by TheAncientRivalry on Mar 2, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

You're wrong, IMO

Smith is significantly better than Moore. As Ziller puts it, Moore is a far cry from both Gooden and Smith. Only here I’ve read different things.

by cordobes on Mar 2, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

This could be the final nail in the coffin

Like almost everyone else, I really wanted Joe Smith – a player who: played excellent help defense against us in the postseason last year, consistently knocked down the midrange jumper, had the height and length to defend other big men like Pau Gasol or Andrew Bynum, and, perhaps most importantly, has been around for a long time but has failed to win it all (adding another hungry player can never hurt). The only way Boston has a chance against Cleveland, LA, or San Antonio (with or without the home court advantage) is if we sign Bonzi Wells – thereby solving our need for help on the wing. I can not emphasize this enough. Here’s a guy who can score off the dribble and in the post, grab a ton of rebounds, play good defense against Kobe and LeBron, and, perhaps most importantly, get to the free throw line. He’s experienced, has not won it all, and has recently played in China for little to no money. I say, in the name of saving the careers of Ray Allen and Paul Pierce, cut Gabe Pruitt and sign Bonzi. Get to it Danny, our title hopes depend on it.

by Celtics Fanatic on Mar 2, 2009 11:01 AM EST reply actions  

Joe Smith was clevelands worse poset defender, he couldnt defend anyone.
He didnt consistently knock down the jumper against us as far as I can remember, and this is something Moore can do anyways
Mikki Moore is as hungry and probably hungrier than joe smith, wasnt joe smith happy to stay with the thunder?

Oh No, The cavs have joe smith, the final nail in the coffin!!!!!

little bit much…its JOE FREAKIN SMITH

by TheAncientRivalry on Mar 2, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

All I remember about Smith from last year’s playoffs is him getting abused by KG in game one on that key basket and not missing a jumper in games 3-6, I think it was. It seemed like he didn’t miss a shot for 3 or 4 games in a row.

by Berkcelt on Mar 2, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

It's not about how good Joe Smith is

it’s about how weak was their frontline after Wallace’s injury (consider that Big Z is only good for 25 minutes per game and that AV is foul-prone). JJ Hickson and Lorenzo Wright for 30 minutes? They’d be creamed by the league’s best frontcourts.

by cordobes on Mar 2, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Just throwing out a possibility here that I personally don’t subscribe to…

Is it possible that, – even though he’s not a shotblocker – Danny valued Moore’s length to be able to at least disrupt the shooting of Big Z and/or Pau? Joe Smith is clearly a better player than Moore or our other backup bigs, but they’re all PFs; even though Moore is scrawney, that’s less of an issue matched up against a finese guy like Pau. He and Z are big enough where they can shoot right over BBD and Powe, and maybe Joe Smith as well.

Was Danny really looking for someone who was a legit 7 footer for those particular matchups?

by theBird on Mar 2, 2009 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

Ainge on the Pruitt situation: “…we’ll suspend him for a couple of games. He’ll lose his minutes in the next couple of games. And who knows. Sometimes when you lose your minutes, you lose your job…” (WEEI.COM).

Is this a chance to open a roster spot and get somebody else?

by braz on Mar 2, 2009 11:19 AM EST reply actions  

i hope so

because we still desperately need to sign a wing player for the bench

by Marqui on Mar 2, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

A question.....

I would think with his track record…Danny Ainge would get the benefit of the doubt around here….that he knows what he’s doing.

by kefa461 on Mar 2, 2009 11:23 AM EST reply actions  

They needed a wing defender, not another big.

by Brickowski on Mar 2, 2009 11:25 AM EST reply actions  

We needed a backup PG, a backup swing guy (taller than 6’4), and a backup big taller than 6’8.

Two out of three, but I’m definitely concerned about that backup wing spot.

by Mencius on Mar 2, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Almost right

We needed (1) a backup PG (done); (2) a backup SF (after Miles was cut, we had no one in that size category—and Walker?giddens are both SGs with TA size, NOT SFs with PP size); and (3) a backup big taller than 6’10" (done). Not bad.

All the palaver about Smith is pure hindsight. If he had sent clear signals, of course DA would have waited!

The Cavs are going to be very tough.

"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark

by Eeyore III on Mar 2, 2009 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

When you’re right, you’re right. :o) Well called.

by Mencius on Mar 2, 2009 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

??

Walker’s listed at 6’6", 220lb. Watching him in games, he looks like the prototypical SF to me. He’s not quite as big as LeBron, but who is? I don’t see him as being any smaller that Pierce.

by theBird on Mar 2, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re right about Walker. I think I skimmed Eeyore’s post. I agree that Walker’s an SF. He doesn’t have the floor game to be a two guard. He’s a power player, even though I think he’s only 6’5. He looks at least an inch shorter than PP to my eye, but he’s got the body to play taller guys. Seems moot, as Doc apparently has zero trust in giving him a try during meaningful minutes.

Other than that, the thrust of the post, that we needed a PG, a bigger than 6’4 swing, and a taller than 6’8 big remains the same, and Ainge filled two of those slots.

by Mencius on Mar 2, 2009 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Not as big as listed

Watch any time he is near TA on the bench. Whether how he plays is more SG- than SF-like is immaterial.

If either Walker or Giddens were big enough to play LBJ, the whole cavil that we need a wing would be self-defeating.

"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark

by Eeyore III on Mar 2, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, it’s not only about having the requisite size. You have to be able to play too, and on that front, Doc is firmly in the unconvinced category, or he’d have played him (or them) long before now. Hell, he played Baby plenty in his rookie season.

I’d say Walker is 6’5 and not the 6’6 as listed, but he’s a more natural SF than SG because he doesn’t have much of a floor game, at least that I’ve seen, anyway. He really plays almost like a PF in that 6’5 frame.

Anyway, Walker having the requisite size would not negate the ‘we need an SF’ argument if he doesn’t also have the required skillset to go along with it, and Doc’s dispensation of minutes says that he doesn’t.

by Mencius on Mar 2, 2009 8:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Money talks?

Is it possible Cleveland just decided to pony up more money once Wallace went down? From one report I read it sounded like the Thunder didn’t want to let Smith go unless he gave back quite a bit of his contract. Sounds like the Cs gave Marbury the rest of the MLE and probably were only offering Smith the vet minimum in which case he wasn’t interested in being bought out to earn a net loss. Just a hunch but I think the dollars had more to do with it than we’ll hear about it in the press…

by Berkcelt on Mar 2, 2009 11:31 AM EST reply actions  

Sounds pretty plausible to me.

by Mencius on Mar 2, 2009 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Firstt time, long time

hey, first time poster, long time reader…nice to finally be contributing

No brainer for the Cavs. Hard to fault Danny, considering the uncertainty regarding Smith. At this point the #1 seed is gone…time for Doc to start playing the “disrespect” card al little to get this team ready to do some damage on the road in the playoffs

by OutofServicePervis on Mar 2, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

welcome to the participatory side, OoSP

Looking forward to your contributions.

I’ll keep holding out hope for homecourt, although it’s going to be tough, no doubt.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Mar 2, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Where Was Smith's Agent?

If Smith really wanted the Celtics, then it was his agent who screwed up, not Ainge. Ainge erred by not going after a wing defender in the first place.

by Brickowski on Mar 2, 2009 12:07 PM EST reply actions  

Seeing as no significant wing guys were bought out, it would have required a trade to acquire one. We had precious little in trade assets this year.

You could then say that the mistake was made not getting the big wing guy in the offseason.

Still, he filled two of the three needs, and the backup wing need, if TA and Scal are healthy by the playoffs, will be less a concern, though I’d have still preferred better options than those two.

by Mencius on Mar 2, 2009 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Could you please ...

… name a wing defender who is/was available for Danny to pick up after the trading deadline?

by TheGreenThumb on Mar 2, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

There wasn’t. But he could have traded for one.

by Brickowski on Mar 2, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Or kept the one he had in the first place.

Penny-wise, trophy-foolish.

by CoachBo on Mar 2, 2009 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Enough with this Joe Smith Fiasco!!!

We have Mikki and I concur that though Danny didn’t wait for Joe, He is not the one that will save this franchise as he is not that much better than Mikki at this point in their career…All he has is a better resume but Mikki will help us in as much as Joe does IMO.

My concern right now is PP playing WAAAAAAAYYYY too many minutes and its not even resulting in automatic wins…Doc, please listen to Paul….Don’t burn him out before the playoffs start…Play Walker or sign a wing defender, whatever…PP needs to go back to playing 35 minutes.

by bopna on Mar 2, 2009 12:22 PM EST reply actions  

Give Him a Break

You can’t get upset at “what could have been”. Ainge did what was best for the team at that time when he picked up Mikki Moore. There was nothing else out there and they were running out of time to sign someone so that they were eligible for the playoffs.

I would rather pick up Mikki Moore (who I think is much better than people want to give him credit for) and have a big on the squad then wait for Smith to be bought out and then have to get into a bidding war with the Cavs and lose because they had more money to throw at him (right?). Then we would be left with no one and a really thin frontcourt.

It’s not worth stressing out over something that has already happened. Weirder things have happened. MAybe they can land Gooden somehow still.

by DjRyB on Mar 2, 2009 12:32 PM EST reply actions  

If it was a mistake Danny wouldn’t have done it, that’s the answer, still no faith in the man around here. Sorry to detract from blogging but Danny and insiders and scouts are the only ones to answer that question with any semblance of legitimacy.

by davemonsterband on Mar 2, 2009 12:48 PM EST reply actions  

Take a chance on Size???

I Think danny wanted smith, but didnt want to take a chance and wait it out and miss out on having some size on the bench, so he signed Moore…i really dont see anything special from Moore yet but he’s surrounded by talent that can make him better..So give the guy some time before you write him off, he may not be a difference maker, but he may make some key plays. like Doc say-“Dance with the girl you came with”….Good luck joe smith

by kelly811 on Mar 2, 2009 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

Past the deadline??

We now cannot sign a player that can play in the playoffs, correct? That deadline was yesterday, no?

by Smitty77 on Mar 2, 2009 12:50 PM EST reply actions  

No.

The deadline for those players to be bought out was yesterday. We can sign waived players at any time.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 2, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m still ticked that Phoenix was able to sign Barnes this offseason for nothing more than the vet minimum. Wouldn’t he be the perfect guy off the bench as the (slightly) bigger wing? With Phoenix being as much the cost-cutting outfit as they are, I wonder if Danny could have grabbed him in a deal kind of like the one we orchestrated with Cassell, or even just take him off Phoenix’s books using our exemption from the Cassell trade.

Grr… looks like Billy’s our best hope for another wing.

by theBird on Mar 2, 2009 2:15 PM EST reply actions  

Luther Head

How’s about Luther Head? He plays hard and can shoot.

by liamail on Mar 2, 2009 4:04 PM EST reply actions  

I think it would be quite harsh to call this a mistake on Ainge.

Also, if Joe Smith wanted to be here, then he’d be here. I don’t believe Aldridge’s report at all, I think he’s simply regurgitating the rumours we saw over the last there weeks and claiming those rumours as facts.

by Who on Mar 2, 2009 4:34 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
"We really have only 2 options to keep winning."
Small
Celtics vs. Heat - ECF Matchup
Small
How Avery Bradley's absence affects everyone else
Small
Thoughts on Celtics vs. Heat
Small
Already Doubting The Celtics?
Small
Start Pavlovic over Ray to cover Dirty Wade
Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi