Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Competition-Free Sunday At the Q

A Daily Babble Production

Let's start with the good news from yesterday's 107-76 Celtics loss in Cleveland: It's over.  End of good news.

It's one thing to lose.  It's another to not even bother coming to compete.

As far as the standings are concerned, yesterday's loss in Cleveland will make no difference.  The Celtics have the two seed in the Eastern Conference locked up, and that's comforting.  Regarding battling the Cavaliers, those who wish to do so will still be able to employ the security blanket of Kevin Garnett's absence for explaining away another road loss in Cleveland.  And sure, Garnett's presence should and likely will make a difference in whether this team wins or loses big games in the playoffs.

But no matter the ultimate value of this one Sunday afternoon game, and no matter who wasn't in uniform, it wasn't losing to a very tough (especially at home) Cleveland team that irked me yesterday: It was the embarrassing effort or lack thereof put forth by those who did step on the floor for the green.

Star-divide

The Celtics didn't lose yesterday because their shots "just weren't falling" or because of anything the officials did (as stunning a concept as that might be).  They lost because not a single member of the active roster came to play.

They didn't miss good shots.  The Celtics didn't get too many looks that classified as good.  Doc Rivers told them in the huddle to make the extra pass.  They forced bad shots instead.  Paul Pierce served as the ringleader of that brigade with a bit too much do-it-all-myself activity early on, but the Infuriated Infant took a couple of out-of-character attempts in traffic and was joined by several others.  Credit the Cavaliers for doing a fine job in their man-to-man defense as well as bringing help at the right spots in the paint.  Cleveland is an excellent defensive team, and the Cavs don't deserve anything taken away from a fine effort on Sunday.  But the Celtics' fifth-ranked offense didn't make them work too hard by "playing" offense as individuals rather than a unit.  Rajon Rondo didn't get involved early and later reverted to the same fearful-looking approach he displayed in the Celtics' loss at the Q back in January.  He was far from alone.  Too much head-down dribbling from everyone led to plenty of bad shots and a 35.8 percent shooting mark from the field.

The effort on the boards was nonexistent.  The Cavaliers crashed after every miss and came up with offensive boards on 25 percent of their opportunities.  The Celtics watched as the ball bounced around and white jerseys worked harder to pick it up and slam it back home.  The focus at the foul line appeared to have been left in Boston as well, as the Celtics shot a sizzling 59 percent thanks to a 13-for-22 effort.

The defense proved just as much a joke as the offense.  Too many times, Rajon Rondo watched Mo Williams cruise past him to wreak havoc in the lane.  LeBron James made a basket cut for a dunk and later hit a three with no Celtic anywhere near him.  For all the help concepts that the Celtics rely on, I'd be shocked to find any part of the plan that involves Bron's man sloughing away from him and then ignoring him entirely.

That's enough of the in-game specifics.  Ever the optimist as a fan, I can't remember the last time I couldn't even convince myself to have pseudo-realistic hope going into the fourth quarter.  I just wanted the final 12 minutes to fly by as quickly as possible.

Good on the Cavs for playing a fantastic game.  While the Celtics didn't make it too difficult for them, the Cavs did their part.  James hit a couple of deep threes, and all the guards shot the ball effectively as well.  Good on the Cavs for having fun, too.  They came to work on Easter Sunday and beat the defending champions silly in front of a packed house.  If they want to dance and goof on each other on the sidelines while their starters rest with a 30-plus point lead, by all means: They earned it

That the Cavs are such a close-knit team that enjoys working together is nice in an age where so many see sports culture described as me-me-me.  I've loved watching the Celtics' stars jive in sync with each other at the end of blowout wins over the last two seasons.  It wasn't as elaborate, but if we're getting into degrees-of-team-celebration debates, that reeks of frustration over losing.  If the Celtics don't want to see opponents doing that type of thing on the sideline, scoring more points than the other team seems like a good place to start.  I find Ray Allen's below-the-belt shot to Anderson Varejao far more inappropriate than anything the Cavs did. 

Allen is one of the classiest athletes in pro sports, and I'm proud to root for him despite a momentary error in judgment.  In that same vein, Paul Pierce is one of the NBA's toughest, best and most hard-working players, and it's a pleasure to watch him most nights when he isn't moping around the floor looking disinterested.  So it goes right on down the line with this team.  One game doesn't change any of those track records.

But yesterday, none of the Celtics looked like the cared, and if that was the case, they might as well have stayed home.  Losing happens.  Putting on the jersey and not coming to play shouldn't.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I keep hearing a lot about “motivation,” and how the Celts will now be motivated to do certain things that they didn’t do yesterday. As an outsider, does it bother any of you guys that your team needs to be “motivated” to win games? that would scare the crap out of me if it were the case about the Cavs… Just curious.

http://www.waitingfornextyear.com

by scottsargent on Apr 13, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Not really, the celtics dont need any motivation, they are plenty motivated as far as im concerned, theyre now finishing up another 60 win compain, 3rd best record in the league a year after winning the championship with alot of injuries along the way… theres absolutely nothing to be ashamed of with that..

Hypothetical question to you cavs fan, if your cavaliers were to meet the Magic again, you dont think lebron and company would be motivated to redeem themselves for that drubbing (or 2 actually) they took in orlando this season? absolutely they would. get it yet?

By the way, the celtics DID come to compete yesterday, they just got blown out…simple as that…they wanted to win, the cavs made a ton of shots, and tough jumpshots at that, and the celtics missed alot of decent looks, over and over again and before you know it the game was compeltly out of control and the celtics really didnt have the urgency to comeback in a game that whether you want to admit it or not, meant nothing.

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

PP sent his doppelganger... and he SUCKED out there...

I agree wit Jeff, none of the starters were competing…

by jyrecelts on Apr 13, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then why’d they say they wanted to win?

Did they not want to win game 3 in the playoffs against cleveland either (108 – 84, something like that) they got blown out, end of story

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

The fact that the Celtics showed up at the Q in person does not mean they came to play and compete. If they did, they did a REALLY BAD job of showing it. That just shows how fragile the Celtics really are. Without KG they look lost on defense and sometimes(like last night) on offense as well. The Celts got beat on both ends of the floor…i mean if Wally can reject a shot(white man with no vertical leap whatsoever) than the Cavs’ defense must have been good, which it most certainly was. Also the fact that you guys refused to move the ball around definitely helped out the Cavs too, but the Celtics just played bad altogether, case closed.

by NBA FAN on Apr 13, 2009 3:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Another thing…. what’s the deal with Ray Allen getting angry about the Cavs’ celebrating a good win? That time of month again or something? Basketball is a game…it is meant to be enjoyed and you are supposed to have fun playing it. The Cavs have great team chemistry this year and love seeing each other do well. The Cavs were not mocking the Celtics, they were having a good time. Just because you get blown out doesn’t mean you need to accuse the team that destroyed you of being unsportsmanlike. Just take the loss and move on. What a baby…

by NBA FAN on Apr 13, 2009 3:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I dissagree

the behavior of the cavs was unsportsmanlike and stupid. As Ray said, these teams play each other too often for that kind of behavior, there is always a next game. Moreover, that was a meaningless game against a banged up celtics team on their own home floor, total lack of class. I don’t buy the excuse that “they are a close knit group who love to have fun”. That doesn’t justify losing all respect for the other team and acting like a bunch of fools. It will come back to haunt the cavs. What a great example lebron is setting for young kids as the “chosen one”

by hpantazo on Apr 13, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

dance, gino, dance

many good teams do this kind of stuff at home. the cavs have done it all year, just like the celts did it all last year.

who cares? if ray could hit a shot against the cavs, he wouldn’t be complaining after the game. and i love ray.

by csung on Apr 13, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

LeBron can dance now, they all earned that yesterday... but come may...

I don’t think he or they were unsportsmanlike. The players are all men, No celtics complained about Cav celebrating, Ray only said “it’s great motivational stuff” not that they weren’t entitled to do it…

by jyrecelts on Apr 13, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually, ray did complain when asked about the celebrations:

from one report. it’s all silly stuff. pierce is the one that took the “who cares” route.
--
It got worse in the fourth quarter when James, Williams and West were shown on the videoboard dancing to the Cavs’ latest tradition, playing 1980s Rick Astley hit "Never Gonna Give You Up" complete with music video in blowouts. Allen didn’t like that either.

"I’m always going to remember that," Allen said. "If I beat a team, as happy as I may be in victory, I’m always going to stay humble…We play each other too much. Those are just great motivational thoughts for me."

by csung on Apr 13, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love ray allen, but he actually sounds like a bitter baby in this case…

He danced to gino all year last year, does he forget that?

Pierces comments were much more professional, he wasnt worried about it, and shrugged it off, but we know hes going to use it as motivation, he just doesnt need to state it publicy.
Something ive noticed about ray, is he can lose his compusure much more easily then youd think

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 14, 2009 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

celtics took the rest of the regular season off..

since clinching the 2 seed. There is no way that this team, playing at 80% effort, would lose so badly in cleveland. They have been to the finals and know what it takes to get there again, and going all out and showing the cavs some of their potential playoff strategy against them in a meaningless game when they are recovering from a number of injuries just doesn’t make sense to them. IMO

by hpantazo on Apr 13, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

hrrmm

I like this theory. It definitely gives me some hope. Let’s see if Doc is the mastermind that you speculate he is

Kick in the door waving the 4-4.....all you heard was poppa don't hit me no mo'

by CaliforniaGreen on Apr 14, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well said

Very disappointing game – one of the few in these 2 years it was impossible to find a positive. From a C’s perspective, of course; the Cavs were their usual self, outstanding and very spirited team, even if they don’t succeed in playoffs (and let’s hope they don’t).

by cordobes on Apr 13, 2009 5:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Well done, Steve

Excellent column, spot on as usual.

It’s worrisome – alibis aside – to see your team roll a non-effort out there at the very time when every coach in this business will tell you effort and play should be peaking.

by CoachBo on Apr 13, 2009 7:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks, Coach

Agreed with your thoughts there, of course.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 14, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Meh. After completing shirking work all weekend and now slacking off on Celticsblog instead of catching up I can’t in good conscience criticize the Celtics for mailing it in. I’ll just say I’m glad I missed another lackluster outing. I can’t wait for the playoffs to start. If that can’t snap them out of the lethargy of the past few weeks I’m not sure what will.

by twinbree on Apr 13, 2009 10:44 PM EDT reply actions  

You're all the better for missing this one, Bree

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 14, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I dont know what lethargy youre talking about these past few weeks….didnt they win 6 in a row?, and like 8 out of 10?
This is just who they are right now

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 14, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

JR on LeBron

I didn’t get to watch the game. But, I know LeBron had his way shooting the ball. Why, because when ’he’s hot, he’s hot’. Even at that I believe he can be rattled and forced to take bad shots if he’s guarded very closely.

This leads me to wonder who Doc thinks would be a better defender on LeBron than JR Giddens. Since watching JR’s defensive quickness/aggressiveness in the pre-season to watching his great outing in March(?) I’m frustrated by Doc’s unwillingness to give JR a playing break. Presently JR is off to the Flash for playoff help. There is no chance he’ll be playing for the Celtics in the NBA playoffs.

Just based on physique no one on the Celtics matches JR. I’m talking height, weight and quickness.
Let’s look at possible LeBron defenders should they meet up again.
1. Paul Pierce – sure he’s playing better defense this year and he matches up physically to a degree. But, he lacks JR’s quickness. He still has his moments when he plays 8-15 feet off his man. When I watched Giddens he was never more than 2-3 feet from whomever he was supposed to guard. This, in my opinion, rattles LeBron.
2, Tony Allen…. if it weren’t for his injuries I’d say this might be a pretty good match up. Tony is a step slower on defense than he’s been in the past.
3. Ray Allen… strength and speed issues.
4. Stephan Marbury…. just kidding
5. Rajon….. strength and height issues.
6. Bill Walker… has height and strength. Lacks lateral quickness to keep pace.
7. Eddie…. I love Eddie’s aggressiveness. The height difference is too much.
8. Leon… he’ll be coming back from knee problems. How quick can he be?
9. Scalabrine .. in the open court he would have a tough time defending. Near the basket he might better than anyone mentioned above.
10. Pruitt isn’t strong enough and hasn’t impressed me with his spotty play.
11. Perkins, Kevin G., Mikki …. no way
This JR – LeBron match up seems too obvious to me. Hopefully, I’m missing a big part of the equation and it’s not Doc who is out to lunch.
The answer to handling LeBron will not be bringing back KG. There has to be another answer. Hopefully, Doc will find it.

by Alleyoopster on Apr 14, 2009 12:45 AM EDT reply actions  

What 'great outing' are you referring to, AO?

JR played in six games this season. Four of those featured stints less than a minute long, and his ‘big game,’ so to speak, featured 4:32 of garbage time play in a mega-win in Denver.

I’m enticed by JR’s talent, but I’m not ready to say that any of his regular season appearances offered cause for making me believe he’s the man to stop Bron.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 14, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

A rookie on LBJ? Ugh, I don’t think so.

by CoachBo on Apr 14, 2009 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, JR Giddens wouldnt be able to guard Mike James or Jerome James, nevermind Lebron James…and I too am wondering what solid outting you are talking about? he hasnt yet had one.
Obviously if any rookie were to guard him, its be Bill Walker

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 14, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Guard Mike James.. I could see that possibility. Jerome James, no way. He is 7’1" tall.

I’m judging mostly by what I saw in preseason. Speed and quickness is something you only need to see once. He has it. I don’t see Ray Allen, Paul Pierce, Tony Allen or Stephan having nearly the same speed. Pruitt and Rondo don’t have the strength to contain him. Walker matches up physically, but lacks lateral quickness. I like Eddie’s quickness and energy, but his height is a liability.

I understand he will not play in the playoffs. I just don’t see anyone on this team who could do a better job guarding him. Who do you feel comes closest?

by Alleyoopster on Apr 14, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds to me like you're short-selling the job Pierce (and the Celtics' help defense)

did on him a season ago and has done at times this year (mostly the two contests in Boston).

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 14, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t even believe you would suggest that Brian Scalabrine could do a good job on Lebron ever.

by jek29 on Apr 14, 2009 12:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Good point about Scal. I was just projecting, with Scalabrine’s hustle, he might hold his own on one or two plays as long as it was not in the open court.

Even though Pierce and crew did a decent job this year and last, I don’t feel it would be enough should they end up playing the Cavs again. They have too many offensive weapons to play team defense on James.

Most likely Giddens would not have much of an impact either. What I’m upset at is that we will never know. Instead, the Celtics would prefer to go with players one knows can’t guard him; such as an injury plagued Tony, and offensive minded players like Stephan and Pruitt.

by Alleyoopster on Apr 14, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
"We really have only 2 options to keep winning."
Small
Celtics vs. Heat - ECF Matchup
Small
How Avery Bradley's absence affects everyone else
Small
Thoughts on Celtics vs. Heat
Small
Already Doubting The Celtics?
Small
Start Pavlovic over Ray to cover Dirty Wade
Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi