Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Drug Testing, Alistair Overeem & UFC 146's Potential Legacy

Inconvenient Truths

There are some truths that we hold onto on days like today and some that we would like to forget.

Here are some truths that we would like to forget but probably would do well to remember:

  • This wasn't a "meaningless game."  The Celtics wanted to win yesterday.  They didn't play like it, but they wanted to win and they didn't.  Period.
  • Missing Garnett doesn't give the team an excuse to lose by that large of a margin.  They got whooped fair and square.
  • LeBron James deserves the MVP and he's still getting better.  Regardless of how he played in last year's playoffs, he'll be a beast in this year's version.
  • The Cavs are really, really, really good.  Really.
  • We still haven't proved that we can win on the road in Cleveland.  We'll need to to advance.
  • The LeBron led taunting probably wasn't any worse than what KG has done in the past.  The Celtics talk trash as much as (if not more than) anyone.
  • Don't even try blaming the refs in this one.  Really.  Just don't.

Here are some truths that our opponents would like to forget but that we'll hold on to.

  • Scoreboard. NBA Defending Champs.
  • Maybe they'll use this game as motivation, but really - why would they need to?  The Celtics don't need any additional motivation to beat the Cavs in the playoffs.
  • The Cavs still haven't proven they can win in Boston.  If the Celtics win just one game in Cleveland, the pressure shifts to them.
  • The last game these two teams played, (also without KG) Powe and Baby combined for 30 points and the C's won by 11.
  • Everything changes in the playoffs.  One of these teams has proven itself, the other has not.
  • The Celtics, regardless of yesterday's game, will be at or near full strength for the playoffs.  When the Celtics are at full strength, they are really, really, really good.  Yes, really.

Comment 85 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

solid points

solid points but there’s a definite slant on both sides. The Cav’s positives are in the present. The C’s positives are about last year and what ‘could be’ this year (healthwise and stealing a win in CLE).

The Cavs are hungry for it. The C’s need to show they still have that fire because it wasn’t evident yesterday. We’ll have a much better idea if the C’s intend to repeat when we see how they handle their opponents in the 1st and 2nd rounds.

by slamtheking on Apr 13, 2009 8:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Good point. What I was hoping for was a short-handed message to the Cavs yesterday that they’re in for a struggle should we meet – and I don’t think that’s a certainty – in the playoffs.

All we accomplished was to amuse them, apparently.

I’m looking right now for quality of play, something approximating championship-level basketball – because it took all of that we could muster to win the title last year. Right now, our quality of play isn’t remotely close to that level, and it’s going to take time – time we may or may not have – to get it there.

by CoachBo on Apr 13, 2009 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

another truth

that was a really cheap shot by Ray – even eight year old kids know not to do that. in light of the fact that Ray is usually the classiest guy on the court, there must have been some extreme frustration going on.

by Rael on Apr 13, 2009 8:18 AM EDT reply actions  

agree

I just thought that was covered in a post I wrote last night

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Apr 13, 2009 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

It was. Ray’s flare-up was just another unpleasant surprise in a day full of them, Jeff.

by CoachBo on Apr 13, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

That “cheap shot” was so miniscule it shouldnt even be talked about, how soft are you, or how perfect do you think you are? Im still not understanding why people dont understand Andy V threw ray allen to the ground, and he reacted.. big deal, who cares, get over it

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ancient Rvialry Agree!

This incessant whimpering about Ray doing the wrong thing is driving me crazy. Good lord !!!!

No one was hurt – not even close. Tempers flare in all sports – especially contact sports!!! It’s called the “heat of the battle”, and probably some frustration of getting your butt whipped.

Would you like them to meet center court and hand shake and hug and say: “I love you man and I am sorry”?

Just think of the clothesline play of McHale on Rambis, or Chief getting off some girlie punches on Lambeer. The NBA game wasn’t tarnished – hell I don’t think anyone was even kicked out the game.

This wasn’t crazy man Artest going into the stands with his former hot-headed Jackson teammate punching out fans at random. This was a below the waist elbow during a rebound by a guy who exmplifies class in the NBA. He felt he was thrown down, and in the heat of the battle he reacted with an elbow. Call a technical if you must and then let’s move on!!!!! Geesh.

I don’t want to be held to the same impossible standards that some of you guys are fantasizing about. Pretty soon Larry Bird type trash talking will be a flagrant foul and suspension.

Maybe we should have them wear helments, soft mittens, and duct tape their mouths shut while were at it just so no one gets hurt including their feelings or gonads.

Now, all the other points of the article I agree with Mr Clark. No excuses – we got our heads handed to us on a platter. Lebron is right. If you don’t like our celebration, then change the outcome. The inconvenient truth is that Poltical Correctness is going ruin this country (if it hasn’t already) and it has infected the NBA and the fans. Let em play!!!!!!

Peace (with an elbow)

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Apr 13, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent post.

It would be nice if the same rules that apply to the rest of the NBA would actually apply to the messiah. I don’t like Garnett’s act, either. If there are taunting rules, enforce them for everybody. Or get rid of the rule altogether. Perk blocks a shot, stares and gets T’d up. Garnett and the messiah make complete asses of themselves with their Tarzan acts and nothing is called. In the third quarter when the messiah ran across the court to protest a call, there isn’t another player in the NBA who wouldn’t have been T’d up. If there are flopping rules, enforce them,. For freaking everybody. Traveling? Earth to David Stern: It isn’t continuation when the shot goes up 2-3 steps after the messiah is fouled.

I wouldn’t enjoy watching the messiah if he was wearing a Celtic uniform. The constant whining, coddling, and ridiculous branding is old and tired.

We could have been playing Charminade and we’d have lost Sunday. When I look at how the messiah is officiated, I’m worried about the close road game we’ll have to win in the playoffs.

What was hilarious about Ray’s elbow is that he left it there after he threw it.

by Finkelskyhook on Apr 13, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

What are you guys talking about! The best part of yesterday was the Allen elbow! Anderson had it coming to him for a looooonnngg time! That almost made yesterdays massacure ok. The one thing that I’m wondering about is the fact that he didn’t react. Like he had no balls at all, but there’s no surprize there

by PerfectStorm on Apr 13, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

why don't you re-read my post Perfect Storm

I have no issue with it. And Finkleskyhook is right – he did leave the elbow there for a second – hahahaha – makes me laugh.

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Apr 13, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good points

Celtics – Rocky
Cavs – Clubber Lang

Apollo Creed: “See that look in their eyes, Rock? You gotta get that look back, Rock. Eye of the tiger, man.”

by Employee8 on Apr 13, 2009 8:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Who's Apollo?

because I want to know who KG will be awkwardly hugging on the beach at the end of round 2.

“I don’t hear no bell”
“Ding. Ding.”

by chunnamark on Apr 13, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Celtics were not nearly as motivated in this game as the Cavs though. That will change in the playoffs.

by NoraG1 on Apr 13, 2009 8:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Here's One More Inconvenient Truth

The league and the media want a Kobe-LeBron final. It’s a marketeer’s dream in a slow economy. They really, really, really want it. Really.

by Brickowski on Apr 13, 2009 8:29 AM EDT reply actions  

of course they do

the media and the league would love for that to happen

what I object to is people thinking that there’s some sort of conspiracy to make it happen, which is beyond absurd

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Apr 13, 2009 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Its not really that absurd honestly, but if you believe that then last years celtics team was a conspiracy as well

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's not a conspiracy

But the refs are human, and even if not consciously making calls to help one team or the other, they see the media blitz and know who the league wants. I find it absurd that this dynamic is dismissed because there is no conspiracy, we’re talking about human beings who are subject to these kinds of influences.

Similarly, I don’t always think stars “get calls” because officials just hand it to them at Stern’s orders, it is more they are used to their games, know what great heights they are capable of, therefore anticipate things going as they often do. So many calls in the NBA are not really seen because of the speed of the game, many are educated guesses. And when you see Lebron(or Wade, or Kobe) get fouled, legitimately, multiple times, your brain starts to see those calls from familiarity, even when none occurs.

The league could help with this by not employing so many refs north of 60 yrs old, alas, another situation where union seniority trumps skill.

by KJ33 on Apr 13, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is absolutely no way that the officials consistently call an identical play differently when the messiah is in it always to the messiah’s benefit without a directive from the league. The officials are simply too good at what they do to consistently make the same mistakes with one player.

KJ33, this isn’t about age or human error or the crowds. The messiah is fast but not that quick.

Wade, Pierce, and Kobe get star treatment but not to the ridiculous degree the messiah does.

The rules should be the rules with no wiggle room. The rulebook is not a breathing document.

by Finkelskyhook on Apr 13, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you

Didn’t want to complain about it after this loss however, as it comes off as sour grapes or being a conspiracy theorist. I have stated many times in other threads, the league has allowed James’ flaws to simply be OK, not requiring him to actually improve his skills in his deficient areas. He came into the league as a below average ball handler, he has not improved, he is just allowed now to carry the ball on his bullrushes to the hoop.

He does not have an exceptionally quick first step or signature move like Derrick Rose, whose bursts and jump stop move in the lane is nearly unstoppable. He has not improved in this area either. He is allowed to just rush the lane, carry the ball, take extra steps to avoid defenders, all because once he can get to the rim, he finishes spectacularly. When I still had some emotion left watching the recent massacre, I was screaming at the TV that you cannot get a continuation, on the Rondo grab, by taking 2-3 extra steps after contact, no matter how remarkable it is that he was strong enough to get the ball to the basket.

It may not have mattered yesterday, but in any big game, he is nearly indefensible when he has all of these allowances of rule breaking at his disposal, especially when he is hitting his jumper. It defames basketball to permit the best player to simply cover his deficiencies by allowing them. In any youth league, his carries and extra steps would not be allowed, and his coaches would have him work on his game to improve.

In the NBA, he was anointed the next Jordan at 19, and so will never change. In fact, in the rare instance when they do call it right, he is beside himself, hard to blame him, they have permitted it so often they have created a monster. Remember that charge on Pierce last year? The lamest effort I have ever seen at trying to move one’s feet on D, he simply flung himself under Paul, then fell backward, counting on his status to draw a call, not fundamentally sound defense.

by KJ33 on Apr 13, 2009 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd submit that

the Cavs and Lakers (especially LeBron and Kobe) being really good (as are the Celtics) have something to do with that.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 13, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

One of these teams has proven itself?

The coach and several players remain from the Cavalier’s 2007 run to the Finals. I’m not really counting “playoff experience” as a Celtics advantage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q87IZngnKiY

by Thruthelookingglass on Apr 13, 2009 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Really? The 2008 championship is not enough experience? Wow.

by NoraG1 on Apr 13, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Feel free to consider the Celtics’ “playoff experience” an advantage. I personally think that the Cavs’ feat of reaching the Finals counts as playoff experience.

by Thruthelookingglass on Apr 13, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

For Mo Williams?

and Delonte West? There is some experience remaining on the roster from that Finals run, but this group as a whole is different, and still new to this whole thing. Besides, they upset Detroit and were a surprise underdog that emerged that year. The pressure of having the best record, being the #1 seed and anointed champ is a far different thing.

by KJ33 on Apr 13, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

experience is overrated, always has been and always will be…and was last year when noone from our team had that much of it

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

But the C's did struggle a bit early in the playoffs

and at least some of that was attributable to that particular group having never gone through something like that before. The Cavs have not faced any adversity all year, so nobody really knows how they will handle it. I suspect, like the C’s last year, they will figure it out, but to say experience has no bearing is minimizing it too much.

by KJ33 on Apr 13, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

disagree

there may not be a full blown ‘conspiracy’ Jeff but after the Donaghy scandal, everything that goes on in this league is circumspect—-particularly when it comes to the refs and the lack of league action about them.

the poor quality of officiating in the playoffs last year and the regular season this year has put the C’s in a position to be supplanted as the ECF and World champs. Nothing too obvious such as screwing them over in too many games where they drop to the 4th seed but enough to put them out of reach for the 1 seed overall and in the East. The Cavs and Lakers had terrific seasons for themselves no doubt about it and the C’s blew some games they should have won — refs or no refs — but there were few losses that were highly questionable.

Even if the league itself isn’t involved, there’s more to the Donaghy mess than the refs and league are letting on.

by slamtheking on Apr 13, 2009 9:06 AM EDT reply actions  

i still think derek fisher fouled

Ray Allen at the end of the game in boston….and i still don’t know how KG fouls out with 12 minutes left to play on a piss poor screen…seems to me the refs are calling boston more on the screens they set

-don’t know how the refs gave the clippers a timeout when baby had possession of the basketball late in LA

-still think dwight howard bodied pierce on his layup at orlando…and if that would have been kobe or lebron they would have called the foul

so those are 3 games that still bug me because it seems boston didnt get calls that looked like they should have received

by celticinorlando on Apr 13, 2009 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not really the end of the world for us Cs. What happened at the game is really really disappointing but will serve as a good wake up call for us. And as Ray said will serve as a good motivational tool if ever they do meet again. A end of regular season game is completely different from a playoff game. It’s going to be completely different the next time they meet. Time to get every job done from this point. Go Boston Celtics and get that no.18!!

by thatswhatshesaid23 on Apr 13, 2009 9:16 AM EDT reply actions  

we have to give the cavs their due-they are very good. if we beat them this team ranks way up on the scale. meanwhile, we have to get ready for round one and we don’t need a seven game series. all the talk about how williams helping the cavs underscores how delonte has matured into a fearsome player. i like varajao’s hustle and i don’t like his flopping and acting but then he has a great role model in lebron.

by nazzbo on Apr 13, 2009 9:26 AM EDT reply actions  

The Cavs and their fans

are pretty much certain that they’re championship or at least finals bound. One of their fans had LeBron holding a trophy on one of their signs. And I’d love to say they’re counting their chickens too early, but are they? I mean, no other teams are really making a case for going to the finals besides the Lakers and Cavs. They’re the two best teams in the league. I’d love to discredit them because it’s frustrating to see the Celtics lose, but those two teams will more than likely be playing in the finals unless the Celtics somehow establish their impeccable defense of last year within a few games. Here’s to hoping.

by BOSPORTS on Apr 13, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions  

It will be very difficult to beat them without a healthy or close to healthy KG that is to me the only advantage that those teams have over the Celtics in the playoffs. We’ll see what happens.

by NoraG1 on Apr 13, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did you feel that way about the C's last year after 66 wins?

I bet you did, and then how were you feeling in the midst of the Atlanta series? The playoffs are a big proving ground, and while I expect the Cavs to pass that test, it still has to be done, and playoff games are still different. No credit is given once the ball is tossed up for how many wins you have going into the playoffs. Every team is 0-0, no series or game leads are granted to the top seed, they still have to win the games.

by KJ33 on Apr 13, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well said, KJ

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 13, 2009 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with all of your points, except for this not being a meaningless game…it was for the celtics, and they can throw it out the window now…teams are even in the season series and havent played a playoff game yet…

It did mean alot to the cavs and lebron, seems like they wanted done to us what was done to them in orlando…and maybe we needed it, actually we clearly needed it.

The cavs are a great team, and if/when they get by us, Ill be rooting for them over the lakers

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions  

good summary. I’m a die hard celtics fan and I want us to win number 18 badly but deep down I don’t see it happening. We’ve pretty much come up short in every major test we’ve had in the regular season ( Lakers, Cavs, Spurs at home, Orlando) and the injuries are a major concern heading into the playoffs. As I’ve posted before, all the signs are there for us not repeating but I don’t think anyone wants to believe them. I’m not trying to be negative but merely saying that we’re not the dominant team that we were last year and conversely the Cavs look like we did last year.

by Red2 on Apr 13, 2009 9:43 AM EDT reply actions  

2-2 against magic, 2-2 against cavs, 1-1 against spurs, 0-2 against lakers ( either game coulve gone either way)

I agree we likely wont repeat this season, but not because we split with 3 other elite teams, but because the cavs are a better team plain and simple

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Refs are Selective

Watching Anderson Varejao is like watching line play in football. He commits an infraction on every play and it’s simply a question of which ones get called.

There is no doubt that the officials are influenced, not only by a home crowd, but also by what they know the league wants. If they let something go that LeBron does, they won’t be reprimanded.

That’s just the way it is.

by Brickowski on Apr 13, 2009 9:44 AM EDT reply actions  

so, i guess we should have lost by only 25, then?

i don’t see this as the moment to complain about the refs, as mentioned in the original post.

i would take Varejao on the celtics in a heartbeat to strengthen the celtics and weaken the cavs. he’s just the kind of player all opponents hate and the team that has him loves (you heard me, manu, nocioni, etc.). and if he plays like a football lineman and can get away with it, sign me up.

by csung on Apr 13, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

great summary. on the point about excessive celebration:

we just haven’t seen that as much this year with KG shelved. but the celts do that stuff all the time after crushing other teams.

we’re also not used to being on the receiving end because the celtts don’t usually lose by 30+ on the road.

what goes around, comes around, whether for the celtics yesterday or for other teams in the playoffs. any complaining after the game was about shirking blame for a bad performance. we have done exactly the same thing many times since KG arrived. other teams complained all the way to our championship, and who cares?

by csung on Apr 13, 2009 9:49 AM EDT reply actions  

The only way we get by cleveland in the playoffs (hell, if we’re even good enough to get there) is if we play an epic perfect game in cleveland, or the cavs just flat out choke….they control their own destiny and will more then likely win it all this year

by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 13, 2009 9:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Another inconvenient truth...

We didn’t just lose twice in Cleveland this year, we got absolute smacked in Cleveland.

Once with KG, and once without.

Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...

by ManUp on Apr 13, 2009 9:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Then it is fair to say Cleveland got ‘absolutley smacked’ in Boston without KG.

by NoraG1 on Apr 13, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it is a little hypocritical of the Celtics to complain about the Cavaliers’ celebrations on the bench. The Celtics of the past 2 years have been a bastion of excessive celebration and taunting, but while the Cavaliers’ is mostly contained to celebrating with each other, the Celtics is usually taunting the other team and showing them up. And, as a person who has watched probably 77 Cavaliers games this season, I can tell you that the Cavs have been doing this since November. They didn’t just do it because the Celtics were in town. I don’t think its a big deal, though, because if the Celtics needed that celebration to motivate them to play hard against Cleveland, then there are clearly bigger issues at hand for the boys from Boston.

by jek29 on Apr 13, 2009 9:57 AM EDT reply actions  

I totally agree.

Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...

by ManUp on Apr 13, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Celtics like to celebrate

But the Cavs—with LeBron as chief choreographer—took it to another level, mugging for the camera, falling over themselves in a contest in who could look sillier as they piled on the savior, and then dancing on the court late in the 4th quarter. The Celtics have done some celebrations, but it’s never spilled onto the court, nor lasted the entire 4th quarter. So let’s not treat them as one and the same. The Cavs took it to another level and if they want to risk offending the gods and giving us extra motivation, so be it—that’s their right. Lebron was right: if we don’t like it, we’ll have to do something about it next time we play.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 13, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rick Astley

How long have the Cavs been using this song as their ‘celebration athem’? I can’t help but see the connection between Gino and this.

If so, this is another thing that teams are doing in attempt to replicate last years champs along with team unity and defense.

by BOSPORTS on Apr 13, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Free Pass?? Come on now.

I don’t know why everyone keeps saying that “IF THE CELTICS WANT TO REPEAT, THE ROAD IS GOING THROUGH CLEVELAND” “THEY CANT WIN IN CLEVELAND…” So is everyone just giving Cleveland an automatic pass to the East Finals? because last time I checked, they have to play 2 series first before facing the Celtics, and there’s ALWAYS a chance that they could be taken out in the first 2 rounds if they face the right match up. Cmon people.

by BNeville87 on Apr 13, 2009 10:32 AM EDT reply actions  

had to delete your other post

please don’t curse on this blog – hope you understand – thanks

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Apr 13, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Boston just face it !!! The Celtics weren’t complaining when they were taunting other teams lastyear and this year !!!!!! The Celtics suck and their just getting what they deserve, and that’s KARMA .

by Cavs 77 on Apr 13, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions  

yeah, bye

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Apr 13, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I love your spelling

by BOSPORTS on Apr 13, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

There's a long way to go

before these 2 teams might/will meet again. 2 full rounds for each team well tell us a lot about the teams and how they are playing. We all assume, understandably, that these are the teams that will meet in the ECF, but a ton of basketball has to be played by both teams before that can happen. The C’s would be wrong to focus on what they need to do to beat the Cavs at this point, they need to take care of business in the 1st round period. If they do that, then again in the 2nd round. By that point, they’ll either be playing well and will have advanced, or not. That will be the time to assess if the Cavs can be beaten.

Remember, the C’s beat the Hawks in their last regular season game last year not even playing their main guys, then struggled to put them away in 7. I don’t expect the Cavs to have that much difficulty, but their historic home record, best in the league, etc. all goes out the window once playoff basketball starts. Mo Williams has never played in important games, so that is still a bit of unknown. Let’s put this behind us, get ready for the Sixers, Bulls, or Pistons, and enjoy the ride. Plenty of time to think/worry about the Cavs later.

by KJ33 on Apr 13, 2009 10:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Not such a big deal

I remember a Lakers game from (I’m almost certain) ’69. Sunday afternoon, near the end of the season, nationally televised — a big deal in those days. The Celts, reigning champs, though fighting injuries and age throughout the season, lost by over 60 points — in Boston. After the game, Red Auerbach, steamed and embarassed, program still rolled in his fist, came down from the stands and stomped across the court into the locker room to chew out the team.

The Celts went on to win the title. Against the Lakers.

If Garnett and Powe are healthy this tream could do the same.

And yesterday’s blowout will mean little.

by BouncingBuckeye on Apr 13, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Nice recall, BB

While the margin wasn’t quite 60, looks like you just about nailed it – a 108-73 Sunday home loss on May 16, 1969. The C’s reeled off four straight wins thereafter (by 25-plus twice) to end the regular season, and what happened in the playoffs is history.

One other fun refresher from reading Basketball-Reference: The Celts were down 2-0 and 3-2 before winning that Finals against the Lakers.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 13, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I must be getting old

I recalled the 73 and somehow remembered the Lakers getting 130 something. I guess that’s how it felt.

I was also at game 4 of those finals where Sam Jones hit a shot near the top of the key to win it at as time ran out — that tied the series. The shot hit front rim, brack rim, teetered on the edge and as it dropped you could see Chamberlain’s shoulders slump, and knew he must be thinking ‘here we go again’.

by BouncingBuckeye on Apr 13, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

An addendum to Rick Pitino's speech a couple years ago,

Red Auerbach is not walking through that door.. :-)

Seriously, everyone is making something out of nothing. The soonest these two teams could play is 6 weeks from now. There is a lot of work for both teams to do between now and then, although I would say the Celtics have more to do with the Orlando Magic probably standing in their way. But who knows? Maybe Detroit beats Chicago tomorrow night, Boston and Cleveland sweep Philly into the 8th seed and the Pistons end up with the 6th seed and a date with the Magic. That would be quite intriguing considering Detroit has swept Orlando this season.

by jek29 on Apr 13, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t know about you but Cleveland should not be handed the the trophy in the reg. season. They have to earn it. As someone said earlier it is 0-0 in the playoffs, anything can happen. Championship is earned, not a given.

by NoraG1 on Apr 13, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Only one difference this year and last year Celtics

KG has played a grand total of 78 minutes since the All Star break!

Do you think the Cavs or Lakers would have 60 wins by now if their best player LBJ or Kobe} had missed so much time? I`m guessing, NO!!!!

by Title 18 on Apr 13, 2009 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

100 percent on the money

Think about Lakers with Kobe or Cavs without Lebron. Although they are more important to their respective teams than Garnett is to the C’s, despite his defensive greatness. That is the flaw with the Lakers and Cavs, they are more built around one player, versus the C’s being built around 3. That said, if the Cavs and Lebron are healthy, they are going to be tough to beat. The reffing had nothing to do with yesterday’s outcome, but it truly makes me sick the way they defer to Lebron.

by vinnie on Apr 13, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

ALOT OF FACTORS.

I agree with most everybody’s comments here. The Celtics wanted to win. They did not want to do much though for the win. Every game in Cleveland has been lost in the first quarter. Everyone. They start out so poorly. It’s the worst place I see them play. Cavs are for real. More than i thought. Doc blamed himself a bit for not getting the team ready,and motivated for the game.
I think it’s more amazing the Celtics win 60+ games this year. With Garnett out over 20 games. Time after time. Defending champs get beat like this,or don’t have the best record.They hold back until it matters. Im still confident with the team we have,and 95% heath or close to 100% will beat the Cavs in 6 games. I think if the Celtics dont take one of the first two games in Cleveland it’s not good. They got steal the home court right away. I think the first game. If it goes 7 . I’m scared. So it’s got to be 6 games.

by green20 on Apr 13, 2009 12:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Are my glasses that green

to be so blind to all this taunting that other fans accuse the Cs of doing? Especially during last the last season. The way some Cavs fans talk, our boys walked by there bench during every game last year pointing fingers and calling them sissies.

There’s always some posturing during games, especially after a spectacular basket is made but to accuse the Cs of going overboard please. When was the last time KG stood on the sideline after a dunk posing like he was Hulk Hogan? I digress b/c KG does a lot of chest thumping and basket support head butting. Difference, I thought these were personal motivators not taunting.

Shop Smart! Shop S-Mart!

by alecquaid on Apr 13, 2009 2:02 PM EDT reply actions  

What one fan sees as personal motivator an opposing fan finds to be taunting

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 13, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wonder what are the odds?

We’ve got to beat two teams and so do they. Iwill be one happy Celtics fan if we get to the Cavs. Then, we’ve got a damn good chance with KG. No KG, no advance.

by Wildblu1 on Apr 13, 2009 4:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m really shocked here. It seems that every stereotype about Boston fans is true.

- 70% of this thread is talking about bad officiating, and how the refs are out to get the Celtics (after a game that was lost by 30 points), and already blaming future playoff losses on refs.

- 25% of this thread is about how classless the Cavs are for celebrating a victory. Seriously? This is coming from the Celtics? Have you guys even seen your own team play, or do the green-tilted glasses block those celebration images from your head? Don’t get me wrong, I really could care less if the Celtics danced like leprechauns all the way through every 4th quarter. If they are celebrating with themselves, I see no problem in having fun. I’m just shocked at the backlash from you guys about the Cavs doing it. And is Ray Allen really in any position to be criticizing an opposing team of being classless the same game that he elbows a dude in the groin?

- 5% of this thread has really good quality posts, just like the article by Jeff Clark. Its just annoying to have to skim through the rest of the junk to get to the good basketball analysis.

by neyvit on Apr 13, 2009 7:09 PM EDT reply actions  

ahem...

…ahhh crud. yer right…

by jyrecelts on Apr 13, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

there’s a big difference between “trash talking” and “taunting”. trash talking is just the part of the game, seriously-michael jordan did it, so i don’t know why people make such a big deal when we do it. i don’t mind trash talking, but the way the cavs were acting with such mockery on the bench is when you cross the line. they haven’t proven anything yet, and they had their asses kicked by the lowly orlando magic so their histrionics are very UNprofessional. ask any unbiased person out there-there’s a difference between being happy that your team won and just having fun on the bench and how immature the cavs acted. they looked like foolish highschoolers out there-not professional at all. lebron acts just like T.O. does yet T.O. gets bashed for it. the only difference is lebron sweet talks his way out in interviews afterwards. let’s see if they’ll continue doing that, hypothetically, if they reach the finals. the only thing it’ll do is piss kobe off and you know what happens after that.

by b0unce2theastside on Apr 13, 2009 8:01 PM EDT reply actions  

My guess is that "when you cross the line"

depends on what uniform you’re wearing and whom the fan that judges you to have crossed said line happens to support.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
Abounding hitters, no clue about the pitching staff: Beware the Bizarro Dodgers!

by Steve Weinman on Apr 13, 2009 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

it’s funny how other fans calls the celtics fans “homers” “green glasses” “bandwagoners”. i mean, how cliche are those comments nowadays? can’t come up with something new? my point is: EVERY fan is biased, every fan wears their team’s color glasses, every fan is a homer-if you don’t root for you team then you’re not a real fan. i’m not blind, and i’m not gonna deny anything. everything in the top blog was true except for the taunting/trash talking thing and that’s where i’m making my point. lebron & co (especially mo williams) acted like little children on the bench, OVERreacting on every single play their teammate made as if they hit a buzzerbeater or made some type of circus shot. you could immediately tell it was in a mocking manner as opposed to just giving support. they demand so much attention it’s pathetic. i wouldn’t be saying anything if they blew the celts out by 65 points and kept their cool. every opposing team in this league would view their antics as rude, that’s something you can’t deny.

one reason why lebron will never be mentioned on an MJ level-MJ was the epitome of a classy guy. he never did any of the immature stuff. and if you want to be the best of the best, the truth of the matter is your attitude on AND off the court plays a big part in your ‘legacy’. i agree; lebron is MVP, but he’s lucky his demeanor off the court isn’t a factor for mvp.

btw; i was talking about TO’s celebrations, not what he has to say about his teammates.

by b0unce2theastside on Apr 13, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The hypocrisy here is amazing

Please, tell me whats less classy.

A: Someone celebrating enthusiastically and having fun at the success of the bench players in a blow-out – returning the same excitement that those bench players have for the starters. Nowhere does he “taunt” the opposing team, or even look in the general direction of that team.

B. Someone getting on all fours like a dog and barking at an opposing player while game is going on….or clapping heavily 3 inches from the face of an opponent as he is coming up the court. For your information, this is the definition of taunting.

I would actually take you guys seriously if you didn’t have one of the least classiest players on your own team. You have no credibility to criticize others, when your own team does far worse things.

by neyvit on Apr 13, 2009 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

ha ha ha. who's wearing their team's glasses now...

unlike you, i can take off my green glasses and see things the way they really are. first off, let’s not get carried away and say that kg was ‘barking’. i’m glad you did your research on youtube but you can’t honestly believe the title. just cuz he was crawling doesn’t mean he was barking also, the crowd was too loud for you even to hear him make any noise and the camera wasn’t even in the direction of his face. here’s a question: why is it that when kg was on a losing team, no one ever said anything about his so called “taunting”? kg has always been this way(intense), that’s the way he pumps himself up and now that he’s on a winning team, everybody is blowing it up. i admit, that clapping thing in front of the other guy’s face was excessive but that’s just one person on the whole celts team. your cavs, on the other hand, the whole team was in on it, excessively celebrating in a rude manner. when orlando blew the cavs out, did the magic act like that? nope. when we blew out la did we act like that? nope. please take off your glasses for a minute and just admit that they were mocking us. mmk i’m done on this subject time to move on to the next one :)

by b0unce2theastside on Apr 14, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

TO?

TO undermines his teammates and coaches — the ultimate cancer

LeBron gets Illgauskas, Sasha Pavlovic, Drew Gooden and Daniel Gibson to the NBA finals as starters

If you don’t see the difference, you are blind

by BingoSmith on Apr 13, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

My buddy in Cleveland tells me the CAVS are all that's good about that place right now...

…he says the media frenzy there make people root for something, balancing that against severe economic downtimes…

makes sense to me that it’s a bit of a circus, LeBron and co. happy to go with it… which our own backyard has versions of except in 4 team spades…

by jyrecelts on Apr 13, 2009 8:17 PM EDT reply actions  

One other inconvenient truth

Last year the Cavs had the ball down one with the shot clock off to win the series against the Celtics. The Cavs had essentially been together since only the trading deadline when they brought in Wallace Sczerbiac Smith and West. They have been playing together now for over a year and it shows.

Do you think they have made up that 1 pt.?

Do you think the Celtics are one point worse?

Well do ya punk? (Sorry, I just felt like channeling Clint)

by BingoSmith on Apr 13, 2009 9:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
"We really have only 2 options to keep winning."
Small
Celtics vs. Heat - ECF Matchup
Small
How Avery Bradley's absence affects everyone else
Small
Thoughts on Celtics vs. Heat
Small
Already Doubting The Celtics?
Small
Start Pavlovic over Ray to cover Dirty Wade
Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi