Bob Ryan Delivers Truth
I've always been a fan of Bob Ryan's, even when I don't agree with him. He's been hit or miss sometimes in recent years, but he gets a pass because he's Bob Ryan. This article is vintage as far as I'm concerned. You may not like the message but from where I sit, the man is preaching the truth.
Forget a repeat, Celtics are already winners
A highlight:
Is there some kind of entitlement clause I never heard about? Have fans forgotten that when the Big Three were assembled there was an agreed-upon three-year window to produce title No. 17, and that the goal has already been achieved? People have no right to get greedy, especially when two excellent teams such as the 66-16 Cavaliers and the 65-17 Lakers are on the prowl. I'm not saying a healthy Celtics team couldn't have beaten either the Cavs or the Lakers, but I would not have expected them to. Big difference.
He also addresses the conspiracy theories surrounding the injury status updates and talks about Pierce having a chance to show that he deserves to be mentioned with the Kobes and LeBrons of the league.
It is worth the read, I recommend it.
Or if you prefer Bill Simmons, he's got his take up on ESPN. I haven't finished reading it yet, but I'm sure there are some good nuggets somewhere in the 15,000 words.
0 recs |
74 comments
|
Comments
Loser
The teams goals havent changed, and the games still have to played….save the article for after the playoffs as far as im concerned
by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 16, 2009 9:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agree
great article – but put it in the drawer until you see some lady who could be Tractor Trailer’s mom blowing into the megaphone…..er I mean microphone
foghorn leghorn ?? jyrecelts? Now son son son hold on a darn minute here? What might your real name be? Chickenhawk?
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Apr 16, 2009 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
did you read the article?
it wasn’t saying pack it up, its over. its called perspective. everybody clamored for #17. #17 has been gotten. deal with the realities of the moment and don’t act like the sky is falling because you know what, appreciate #17 and don’t dismiss it outright because of the unfortunate circumstances of today.
by ChainSmokingLikeDino on Apr 17, 2009 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent piece of work, largely true. It wasn’t going to be easy repeating if Garnett came back, given his rust, the poor defense this club has been playing, the lack of urgency by some, et al.
by CoachBo on Apr 16, 2009 9:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would like this piece if it came out after we lose…ya know a piece appreciating what we did last year and even how we fought this season and am not disapointed in not repeating
to write it before the games have been played ….way to wave the white flag and quit before a game has been played…its pathetic and shameful, and lets hope the guys in that locker room arent like that….its ridicoulous to think there goal is now just to get to the ECF, no there professional athletes, the goal is still the same
by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 16, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree with Ancient
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Apr 16, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya don't see it do ya?
an’ I think it’s coz ya don’t look… but ya often make sense, so I haveta admit – this sorta fearful ’let’s hope the guys in the lockerroom aren’t like that" stuff ,akes me cringe…
bob ryan has depth in his writing, his perspective, and his humanity is green. do ya read him? much?
by jyrecelts on Apr 16, 2009 9:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There isnt much depth in that article my friend, its pretty straight forward and saying stop whining, we won our championship last year and now the windows closed, Lebron James is God
Oh, and I guess you feel the celtics SHOULD lower their goals to making the ecf? ha…yeah okay, how about just forfeit right now, Like Bob ryan
by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 16, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's
Sentiments aside, is anyone willing to put money on the Celtics winning the Finals now?
Nope. Not me. Without KG they may not even make it to the ECF. It’s not about raising the White Flag. It’s just looking at their performance over the last 2 months and being realistic. Cleveland is playing some of its best basketball. There’s no way we beat them (if we get there) in the ECF with Cleveland having home court advantage.
Yes, we should be positive and hopeful. But this is no different than previous years: PP cannot carry a team to the NBA Finals. Hasn’t happen before and it won’t happen again. I love watching him play and he is awesome. But he can’t carry a team on his back with KG out.
If anyone disagrees with me, place a $100 bet right now, in writing. Put your money where your mouth is.
by Berkeley1297 on Apr 16, 2009 9:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There chances of repeating are slim to none, writing an article before a game has been played about how they already won, but arent gonna win is nice and all…but how about wait until they lose and tell us about it, and appreciate them then, instead of quitting on them.
I dont like throwing in the flag before its all said and done whether the ultimate prize is realistically obtainable or not
..well written or not, just bad timing in my opinion
by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 16, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ryan’s not quitting on anyone. He’s voicing an opinion, to which he’s entitled – and with which some of us agree. I doubt very seriously if you’ll find anyone with the Celtics who doesn’t share his sentiments.
It was going to be tough anyway. Now, the odds are certainly stacked against us.
I wouldn’t put money on getting to the Finals, either. That’s realism. It isn’t quitting. I’ll be here until the final game is lost.
by CoachBo on Apr 16, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
He hasn’t quit on them, he in fact offers up the possibility that this team could beat Cleveland. However, he says its unlikely and that if an ECF appearance is all we get, we should be happy because, to reuse an over used phrase, this group of guys was playing with house money.
Also, he makes a valid point that this playoffs could be more fun to watch, if for no other reasonthan all the pressure is off and anything they do in the playoffs is gold.
by KCattheStripe on Apr 17, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh and paul might not be able to carry a team to the finals by himself (not many people can, Kevin Garnett included)
But last years team aside this is the best team paul pierce has ever been on..
by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 16, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not many, but some
True, KG didn’t carry a team to the Finals by himself. Neither did Jordan (always had Pippen).
Celtics are one of the few teams ever to have 3 All-Stars together (and probable Hall-of-Famers). [Actually 1986 Celtics come to mind: Bird, Parrish, McHale, and Walton]
But the Cavaliers have only 2 All-Stars. And 2 years ago LBJ did take them to the Finals without any other genuine All-Star companion.
No one is saying that PP isn’t good. No one is saying that it’s easy to carry a team to the Finals alone. It’s just that last year PP declared himself the best player on the planet. Hmmm. If that’s true, then this is the time for him to avg a triple double for the rest of the playoffs (or something as remarkable to dominate the offense and defense in a manner that also has his teammates doing exceptionally well).
by Berkeley1297 on Apr 16, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That comment about being the best player in the game was overblown – obviously.
When you just won the finals MVP, going through, guarding and outplaying Lebron and Kobe on the way…that summer you have every right to say youre the best player in the world, especially when obnoxious reporters overseas are contiually asking about Kobe Bryant and whether or not he is the best player in the world. I honestly dont think he truly feels that way, ive heard him through this season calling Dwyane wade and chris paul the best players in the NBA….so yeah
Could KG carry this team to the finals without Pierce? hell no….they made a great duo, and this would be like MJ going into the playoffs without pippen, or kobe without shaq..so on and so fourth.
I also think saying PP would have to carry this team to the finals by himself is somewhat of a slap into the face of Ray Allen, no?
by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 16, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we agree
Okay, in essence we agree, but are probably just emphasizing different aspects.
We agree that minus KG the Celtics are still a formidable force and have good chances of going deep in the playoffs. However, without KG their chances have diminished (not saying they CANT win, but that chances are less and I personally would not put money on it). We agree that KG is not necessarily more important than PP, but that the chemistry of all of the Big Three was essential for a Championship. KG and Ray Allen without PP also cannot win. KG and PP without Ray Allen probably can’t win. So, all 3 are necessary. But note, KG and Ray Allen never spoke as if they were MVP candidates. So, yes, there some subtle pressure on PP to back his talk with some action.
No, none of that is a slap to Ray Allen. Ray Allen is a shooter. Period. A GREAT shooter. One of the best shooters in the history of the NBA. However, to win championships, a team needs defense, a play maker, assists, rebounds, etc. In that regard, PP is the key to success. If he consistently averages nearly a triple double they can win. Even if Ray Allen averages 30 ppg it may not be enough (rebounds, assists, and solid interior defense are not Ray Allen’s specialty). Last year, when Ray Allen was in a shooting slump, the Celtics lost all their road playoff games. When he found his rhythm, they began winning on the road. Ray Allen must have solid games (roughly 25 ppg). But PP must have stellar games consistently.
In conclusion, I think KG, PP, and Ray Allen are all Hall of Fame candidates. I give them a lot of credit for finding a way to play together (Karl Malone and Charles Barkley never found that even after being traded to championship caliber teams).
by Berkeley1297 on Apr 16, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I'm willing to put money on it. I mentioned doing so in a previous post.
I have 2 bets with guys at work on the Cs making the ECF. I would have been willing to bet they win it all, but my co-workers proposed the ECF bet. I may be deluded or in denial, but I’m believing this team can do it until they prove me wrong.
by Cousin It on Apr 17, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take the bet
But that’s only if you give me whatever the current Vegas odds are, since you’re so certain.
by kenmaine on Apr 17, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have loved to have read Bob Ryan when he was in his prime. But alas, in his old age he has become just another venerable shoe in the closet of sports journalism. He just doesn’t get it. Celtics fans want the Celtics to win. The team started out what, 28-2 before everything went wrong? Back then, the team was regularly playing better basketball than even the championship team of a year before. It is a minor tragedy for every fan of great basketball that we don’t get to see THAT team in the ‘09 playoffs. Especially when we were allowed to believe that we might during the weeks when there was still hope that KG would come back. It doesn’t make us ingrates about last year. It makes us celtics fans who still have a real passion for the game. This is something Bob Ryan can no longer say.
And has anybody noticed that Mr. Ryan is incapable (INCAPABLE) of getting through a basketball column without taking some kind of potshot at Pierce? He simply CANNOT give Pierce ANY praise without a qualifier or caveat. He never had this problem when writing about larry bird or michael jordan.
by celticsmaniac on Apr 16, 2009 10:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Remember Willis Reed
Remember 1970, when a crippled Willis Reed limped on to the court, hit two shots and inspired the Knicks to win. It could happen again. That’s why they play the games. The NBA isn’t a fantasy league.
All I want is a fair shake from the officials. Make the Cavs beat us with good basketball, not with tainted wins courtesy of David Stern.
by Brickowski on Apr 16, 2009 10:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
bill simons used like 5000 words to describe how he got started to write the article...
a bit funny
by aeternus on Apr 16, 2009 10:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Celtics
I’m tired of this Cleveland is playing its best basketball latelty without looking at the facts. Did anyone read my post a few days back? Check out cavs last 15 games. PHI lost by 1, @IND w/o Marquis Daniels, BOS w/o KG & Powe, @PHI w/o Thaddeus Young, WAS w/o Gilbert Arenas, SA played with Ginobli but he was out for season next day so clearly was no where near 100%, @ORL lost by 29, @WAS lost by 8, DET w/o AI but Pistons are probably better without him now, DAL w/o Josh Howard, MIN w/o Big Al, NJ w/o Devin Harris, @NJ w/o Devin Harris, ATL w/o Marvin Williams, POR w/o Lamarcus Aldridge. That is 15 games in a row playing an opponent, only 7 games playing a team with their top 3 players in which includes DET w/o AI & SA w hurt Ginobli. Considering Marquis Daniels is IND 4th best player and Marvin Williams is ATL 4th best player that is 2 wins in 15 games playing a team with its best 4 players playing, and those 2 games are DET and SA, so if you count AI as Detroit’s top 3 player and count Ginobli as hurt, its 0. 0 wins in their last 15 games against teams with thier top 4 players in. If the Celtics played 15 games like that with an opponent having a top 3 player out basically every game you would have heard it a million times already. But since it is Cavs and Lebron nobody says anything. I bet nobody even knew that until I bought it up, so now what do you think of cleveland playing its best basketball lately?
by tonyallenisbest on Apr 16, 2009 10:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think they absolutely demolished the Celtics last Friday night, that's what I think.
by Brickowski on Apr 16, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Larger
try Sat afternoon, you know the game where Cavs were +4 for the entire 2nd & 3rd Qts without Leon, guess what he’s back now “Leon’s getting Larger”
by tonyallenisbest on Apr 16, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yo brick-right on. a fairly called game every game.
by nazzbo on Apr 16, 2009 10:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yo brick 2
by the way, how’s the rotator cuff coming along?
by nazzbo on Apr 16, 2009 10:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Slowly, very slowly
Thanks for asking. I am getting close. I can swim the crawl (but not without pain).
by Brickowski on Apr 16, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
was that you
in the KG commercial with the guy swimming laps?
hope you heal up 100%
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Apr 16, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cleveland
I’m not saying that Cleveland is playing “the best basketball”. But they are winning games quite consistently. Sure, the opponents have been severely short-handed. But when we have faced short-handed opponents, we have still lost or barely won (double OT win against a team without Dwaye Wade!)
by Berkeley1297 on Apr 16, 2009 10:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boston
We played that Miami game without Powe, Ray, Scals, TA & KG so I don’t see the comparsion. Yeah the opponents for Cle have been short-handed, ridiculously short handed. 0 wins in 15 straight games against a team playing with its top 4 players playing from the team that is supposedly the best in basketball right now. Have you ever seen anything like that in basketball before? Its not only that, its the fact that nobody mentions it, I bet nobody even knew that until I bought it up, but if it happened to the Celtics that is all anybody would talk about.
by tonyallenisbest on Apr 16, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
without Ray?
When you say we played that Miami game without Ray, are you referring to Ray Allen? He was the hero of the night for making several clutch 3 pointers (one in each of the OT’s). Also the argument was that Cleveland was playing against teams without their best 3 or 4 players. Celtics had PP, Ray Allen, Rondo, and Davis that night. I wouldn’t put Powe and TA as their best 3 or 4 players (certainly essential components, but not the best of the team).
I am not saying Cleveland isn’t benefiting from some lucky scheduling and rosters. However, the Celtics have lost games they should have won (Milwauke, Chicago, Clippers for sure). Cleveland has won the games they should have won. Celtics also lost to SAS at home with an inbound pass by Ray Allen that was lazily inbounded only to have Ginobli pick it off. Celtics lost to Detroit at home when the only STARTER out was KG.
Cleveland is not as good as its record. Agreed. But Celtics have underperformed on several easy games this year and it may come back and haunt them. That’s all.
by Berkeley1297 on Apr 16, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Charlotte Game
“When you say we played that Miami game without Ray, are you referring to Ray Allen? He was the hero of the night for making several clutch 3 pointers (one in each of the OT’s).”
No, you’re thinking of the Charlotte game.
by misterx2day on Apr 16, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Try Bobcats
Yeah, I mean Ray as in Ray Allen, He didn’t play in that OT Miami game he had a dislocated elbow and sat out, we played that game with 5 key players out. The game where Ray hit those 3’s in double OT was against Bobcats
by tonyallenisbest on Apr 16, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
true that
Yes, true. Sorry for the confusion.
by Berkeley1297 on Apr 16, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nevertheless
Nevertheless, Miami was without Dwaye Wade, no?
by Berkeley1297 on Apr 16, 2009 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
last 15 games
Yes Miami was without Wade for that game, but Wade played in the last game we played them last week. At least we have 7 wins in our last 15 against teams with their top 4 players in, the Cavs have 0, while both teams are 12-3. Yet there isn’t a single person on TV or in the media that says the Celtics finished the season on a better note than the Cavs
by tonyallenisbest on Apr 16, 2009 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
interesting
funny how Bob Ryan and Dan Shaunessy can write the same kind of article but one comes across as classy realism while the other seems like trashy sensationalism
part of it is the timing (Dan’s was before the KG news was certain) but most of it, I think, is just style of writing
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Apr 16, 2009 10:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes...
because one actually knows what he is talking about, ryan, and one is a blowhard who spouts opinions with no knowledge, mr. d.s. and it is reflected in their writing. shaunessy is out to make headlines for himself even when facts are against him whereas ryan actually pays attention to what the realities are. look, bob ryan knows the nba. maybe not as much as jackie mac, but still. he understands basketball. period. shaunessy has always been a marrioti type looking to be bold and edgy and make a name for himself on his brash opinions whereas ryan actually understands how the nba works and writes based upon his informed opinions.
by ChainSmokingLikeDino on Apr 17, 2009 3:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree with the sports guy
have to say the c’s are good to go for the finals. paul could focus on just one half defending lebrick and the guys could put together just one torrid three-point shooting display (like game 4 against the lakers) to steal a game in cleveland.
by celtsucka on Apr 16, 2009 10:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with celticsmaniac
What an awful piece of writing!! I definately believe we have another chance to be the world champions. It would be alot better to have KG in there, but look how well we’ve done this season in spite of all the setbacks. Paul Pierce does not get enough credit for what he contributes to the team either. He is an incredible player.
Let’s not wave the white flag. What a depressing article. I was actually shocked just now when I saw it!
CELTICS WILL BE THE WORLD CHAMPIONS IN 2009! GO CELTICS!
by mmbaby on Apr 16, 2009 10:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ugh
ryan didnt wave the white flag. the point of the article is complaining about thinking you are owed a banner when you neglect to appreciate the one the boys brought home last year.
by ChainSmokingLikeDino on Apr 17, 2009 3:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta agree with Simmons
on the death of the newspaper point. It’s not that newspapers are so important. It’s how they broke stories that were always so important. And that type of journalism is all but dead now. Very revealing indeed. (And the Wire analogy, no how pertinent, was pretty easy to spot too.)
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Apr 16, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
except
1. the newspapers didnt die because of some unstoppable force, their own arrogance, and a complete fear of the internet (getting killed by google and craigslist) – did.
2. lots of people saw this coming, e.g. read instapundit.com – BSG just only reads things in his wheelhouse (sports, pop-culture)
by Brendan on Apr 16, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Newspapers have died for lots of reasons
The mention of the Wire is the cause & effect of not recognizing why newspapers were so popular once upon a time. They were a style of reporting that couldn’t be had anywhere else. That was Simmons point. And, mine.
Let me rip some of BS column for you:
The Celtics controlled the information about Garnett’s situation as masterfully as anything I’ve ever seen. For two solid months, they had everyone (fans, media members, experts paid to objectively cover this stuff) convinced that the man was coming back. As I wrote in my MVP column this week, “They’re doing the right thing and pretending that he just needs rest and everything’s fine and he’ll be back for the playoffs and don’t worry and nothing to see here … and if you believe that, I have some Billy Owens rookie cards I want to sell you. This is THE biggest subplot heading into the playoffs. KG is not fine. There is nothing structurally wrong with him. It’s wear & tear and age & miles. Huge difference.”Then he launches into the point about how some guy named Bob would have ripped the lies to shreds. Perhaps you’ve heard of this Bob character. This is after continuing the point of the culminative psychotic obsessiveness that KG has taken it’s toll.
For the past few years, as newspapers got slowly crushed by myriad factors, a phalanx of top writers and editors fled for the greener pastures of the Internet. The quality of nearly every paper suffered, as did morale. Just two weeks ago, reports surfaced that the New York Times Company (which owns the Globe) was demanding $20 million in union concessions or it’d shut down the Globe completely. I grew up dreaming of writing a sports column for the Globe; now the paper might be gone before I turn 40. It’s inconceivable. But this Garnett story, and how it was (and wasn’t) covered, reminds me of “The Wire,” which laid out a blueprint in Season 5 for the death of newspapers without us fully realizing it. The season revolved around the Baltimore Sun and its inability (because of budget cuts and an inexperienced staff) to cover the city’s decaying infrastructure. The lesson was inherent: We need to start caring about the decline of newspapers, because, really, all hell is going to break loose if we don’t have reporters breaking stories, sniffing out corruption, seeing through smoke and mirrors and everything else. That was how Season 5 played out, and that’s why “Wire” creator David Simon is a genius. He saw everything coming before anyone else did.
That was his point. Mine too. I don’t care at all about newspapers dying. They brought it upon themselves, and the Internet is a much cheaper, energy efficient, and more effective dissemination tool anyway. Bill Simmons writes for ESPN. Imagine if he wrote for the Providence Journal? Does he have the same effect? Of course not. He writes for ESPN. Which was another part of his point that was important. There’s more money and influence for a Simmons writing for ESPN than there ever was for him trying to write the beat for the Celtics in the Daily Herald over 10 years ago.
What newspapers haven’t done, and haven’t figured out because they were sinking so much money into PAPER, was that the internet isn’t going anywhere. It doesn’t cost as much, and isn’t as difficult.
I’m not a Celtics fan, never stepped in Boston once in my life (which is not to say I have anything against Boston—I don’t), and I don’t really care about local coverage of the Boston teams. But, I am a Kings fan, and I’ve watched the local paper in Sacramento lay off it’s major NBA writer with quality contacts because the business has gone so bad. There is now less quality content, and that same writer writes for CNNSI. If you dont’ know who Scott Howard Cooper is, you’ll know soon. He was built to be a blogger/crap rag type of writer. It’s what he does best. Guys like Bob Ryan were born to be hounddog sniffing reporters on situations such as what’s happened with KG. And yet, nobody had a clue.
So, yeah, while I’m not a Celtics fan, and I spotted the death of the newspaper, I’ve been rueing the loss of the methods that made so many newspapers important in the first place. This KG story is just yet another example of how open the world at a time where it’s shrunk because of the same factors.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Apr 17, 2009 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for stopping by and reminding me that I haven't been lurking at StR in a few days, Pookey
…and oh yeah, for a nice set of insights as well.
-sw
The best of the 2008-09 Boston Celtics is still yet to come. Believe.
by Steve Weinman on Apr 17, 2009 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it's just me SW
But isn’t there a touch of irony when Boston’s most famous writer talks about how important that Boston’s best basketball beat writer is no longer doing it, and that same beat writer writes a column telling the folks in greater Green Bandwagon land to chill and don’t worry be happy? Ironic to the nth degree.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Apr 17, 2009 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well...
that is simplifying and obfuscating to some degree. bob ryan isn’t a beat writer. he’s a columnist which is a very different thing. not saying i don’t appreciate your comments, they are appreciated very much so, just pointing out what is a distinction. ryan isn’t in the locker room writing game stories. he’s a face, a public figure, a talking head. and he knows tons about the nba but he isn’t in there, flying to all the away games, etc. i still feel the gist of the ryan article wasn’t saying chill but saying don’t be a bandwagon fan who thinks we’re owed anything. appreciate what this team did bringing #17 to boston and have some perspective on the realities of the nba.
by ChainSmokingLikeDino on Apr 17, 2009 3:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What to watch for -
…the Cavs definitely opened-up-a-can on the Celtics the other day; now the outlook is grim. The outlook has flipped in the blink of an eye as they’ve gone from arguable favorites to sheer underdogs.
They’ve got lots to play for and I’m quite interested to watch the interaction between Kevin and the boys during the games. We’ve not really seen that yet. This interaction will be new…and given the magnitude of games to come, I think his mere presence will have a positive effect on them this post season.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk
by mcpu40 on Apr 16, 2009 11:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There is no doubt
…that someday Lebron James will be champion. I am not prepared to concede that that day will be in this year. The Cavs have a lot of talent and great chemistry… but they’re a bunch of kids having a great, fun time. They haven’t yet developed the heart of a champion. Doesn’t mean they won’t get there… they very well might. But they haven’t proven it yet. We have.
And often, it’s not the better team on paper that wins. It’s the team with the bigger heart. Like the ’70 Knicks, and yes, like the ’08 Celtics. On paper, LA was the better team. But they lacked the character, and the cohesion, to win.
Our guys are primed. The more adversity they face… “unreal” adversity this time… the more determined they become. That’s Doc’s gift to this team.
I have little doubt they can beat LA, don’t care what the media say. The challenge is Cleveland. Without KG it will be difficult, but far, FAR from a foregone conclusion.
So, I think Ryan is wrong. And agree with Ancient that the article was premature, regardless of what you think about its accuracy.
by DRJ1 on Apr 16, 2009 11:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well said...
…especially about Ubuntu, which is the gift to this team you refer to…
by jyrecelts on Apr 16, 2009 11:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The pressure is off ...
So its official KG won’t be in the playoffs. All so-called experts have written us off. We are not supposed to get to the Finals, the ECF or even the 2nd round, blak, blak, blak. So there really is no pressure of the Celtics. Relax, have fun, kick some butts and show the world we still have enough to win it all.
by This is NOT NOT our year on Apr 16, 2009 11:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Meh on the negativity
Bring on the Playoffs! I want to see some Celtic games!
by LuckyNumber07 on Apr 16, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I absolutely loved Simmons' piece
What a throwback that was – the best coming at the end with the credit to Doc.
I’m in that boat, too – I’ve done plenty of criticizing, overall in seasons past and on specific occasions this year – but what a job he’s done overall.
Believe.
-sw
The best of the 2008-09 Boston Celtics is still yet to come. Believe.
by Steve Weinman on Apr 17, 2009 12:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
An injury away ....
I do not wish any harm or injury to either LeBron or Kobe.
But any major injury to these two players during the course of the play-offs … then the Cavs and/or the Lakers are kaput!
So … it’s too early to throw in the towel.
by TheGreenThumb on Apr 17, 2009 12:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agree
I agree I do not wish anyone could get hurt, but its not Lebron or Kobe that is the big deal, if any of those teams key players are out they will lose. Every other team needs everbody to be at 100% to win. We are the only team in the NBA that can win without a key player.
by tonyallenisbest on Apr 17, 2009 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Weinman
Nice sig, man. Love it.
"....you can't handle The Truth"
by kheeko on Apr 17, 2009 1:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, kheeko
We’re fans as in fanatics, right?
And yours works, too. :-D
Believe.
-sw
The best of the 2008-09 Boston Celtics is still yet to come. Believe.
by Steve Weinman on Apr 17, 2009 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
As long as KG is out, I definitely will uphold my strike and not post on the forums. But, articles are fair game. : )
So, that said….I still think KG will come back.
I’m waiting for the “drinking kool-aid” comments. Kool-Aid > Beer, anyways. : )
by Tai on Apr 17, 2009 1:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope I get hit by a nuclear missile today.
by davemonsterband on Apr 17, 2009 1:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If you do...
…please say “Hi” to Red from me! ;-)
by Amager Celtic Fan on Apr 17, 2009 5:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shut them both up.
With K.G. out it will be a large mountain to climb to win it. As a Celtic fan if the C’s lose it would be great if L.A. and Clevland both got eliminated then they could both shut up and choke on that history book they wrote in advance.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Apr 17, 2009 2:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
3-yr window
I don’t agree with Ryan saying that the goal of the "agreed-upon three-year window " is just to bring banner 17. The goal has always been to win as many banner as possible, especially considered the Celts did give up a lot for KG.
Ryan implied the Celts has already accomplished what they got KG and Ray Allen for in the first year, so we fans should not ask for more now. I totally disagree with his point of view on this one. Does that mean the Celts can go back to re-building mode and start the youth movement again?
by This is NOT NOT our year on Apr 17, 2009 4:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you never know
get to Memorial Day and see what happens…we are one ankle sprain from the finals…albiet LeBron’s of course….play it out
by Motown on Apr 17, 2009 5:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LeBron and Mo
If the Celts play Clevland have Big Baby deliver a Kurt Rambis chop to LeBron on a breakaway that could do the trick. The only problem is Big Baby may break his arm. There can’t be anything upstairs but stone acting the way he did on a team that’s 0 for 30 years. The other juvenile act Mo Williams deserves the same thing, CHOP CHOP!!! If we go down let’s go down swinging.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Apr 17, 2009 6:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Save the the “we appreciate you even though you lost” until they actually lose. period.
by TheAncientRivalry on Apr 17, 2009 8:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
























