Good Situational Work From One Green Reserve
A Daily Babble Production
On a postseason-opening day that featured a litany of problems for the Celtics, it wouldn't be hard to overlook one of the more pleasant parts of yesterday's game for supporters of the green: Tony Allen's defensive play, especially late in the game.
TA participated in just four defensive possessions during the fourth quarter and overtime of the Celtics' 105-103 loss to the Bulls. But he did exactly what was asked of him: stop Ben Gordon.
In the three and a half minutes before Allen entered the game with 1:07 to play in the fourth quarter, the Bulls' shooting guard came alive on an otherwise rough shooting day. He knocked down four of five shots from the field during that span and finished an and-one to post 10 of his 12 fourth-quarter points and half of his output for the afternoon.
In an effort to neutralize the dangerous bomber in red, Doc Rivers chose to go offense-defense for the final minute and change. The Gordon-centric results were excellent. Allen denied Gordon the ball on each of his first two trips down the floor after entering. On the third, he forced him into a contested jumper that missed and then successfully denied him the ball again late in overtime. On a couple of these occasions, Gordon's inability to get free of TA made him a complete non-factor to the play, and he resorted to clearing to the corner to try to let his teammates score in a 4-on-4 situation.
The Celtics' reserve didn't hold Gordon or commit a foul at any point. He just slid his feet and insisted on staying between his man and the ball as much as he could.
Of course, the rest of the Celtics' defense had its share of issues, especially with regard to point guard Derrick Rose. But Allen took a hot scorer with a reputation as someone who can't be left open and effectively removed him from the Bulls' options at crunch time. That's a job worthy of commendation.
The rest of the thought jumble from a stunning defeat:
- Hats off to Derrick Rose. Welcome to the playoffs, sir. Great, great, great offensive game. And to think I managed to not peg this guy as Rookie of the Year earlier this week.
- A fine round of applause to Rajon Rondo for keeping his team in the game at the offensive end for much of the day. Beyond several big baskets and the fact that he, like Rose, hit each of his free throws (albeit only four compared to Rose's 12), he didn't turn the ball over until the 2:41 mark of overtime on what was at least a catchable pass to Kendrick Perkins. Tremendous offensive rebound to set up his mini-jump-hook over Joakim Noah to put the Celtics in the lead in the final minute. Fine job at one end of the floor, Rajon.
- During their various ravings about the point guard duel (which was without doubt quite compelling on both sides), ESPN's Dan Shulman and Jon Barry offered nary a word about the terrifically poor defense played by both players. I realize that Rose and Rondo are both tough covers, and they both deserve credit for making several excellent plays to facilitate baskets. But neither came anywhere close to doing enough in his efforts to keep his man in front of him. My greater problem at this end came with Rondo, but that could be merely because of how heralded he has become as a tenacious defender (fair in many team-based and gambling-oriented regards) and the fact that as a Celts fan, guys in green making mistakes draws my ire more than guys in the other uniforms doing the same. So we'll leave it here on this subject for now and see what game two brings.
- I enjoyed Kendrick Perkins' two fortuitous baskets on late-clock flings from the foul line and the middle of the lane.
- Here's to a better night from Ray Allen come Monday. It almost goes without saying, but just in case: I had zero problem with him taking the last shot. His body of work has indicated time and again over 15 years that for Ray, every shot is truly the next shot, not a nervous-wreck fling to compensate for the last shot.
- The Celtics got Tyrus Thomas to take several shots that they wanted him to take from mid-range, where he shot less than 40 percent this season. He hit several of them. Credit earned.
- Kirk Hinrich made a great play to tap the ball away from Paul Pierce at midcourt and set up a Thomas runner in transition in the final two minutes.
- The Celtics did a putrid job defending in transition.
- Leon Powe made a nice contribution with his eight-point, eight-rebound effort in just 17 minutes, and he abused Tim Thomas for a brief stretch in the second quarter. I would be surprised if his minutes don't pick up as the series goes and he grows further removed from his injury.
- Some up, some down for Paul Pierce. For the regularity with which the Celtics successfully forced Derrick Rose to switch to him defensively at the foul line, the results were a bit lower than expected. Bad timing for a missed free throw, of course, but it happens.
- Joakim Noah recovered from allowing a few early Perk baskets to play a fine all-around game. Finished a couple of buckets around the rim, blocked shots inside and did good boardwork at both ends (17 rebounds, five offensive), though he did commit a dumb foul on Paul Pierce that could have cost his team the game. Also, it hit me for the first time yesterday afternoon that he shot a higher percentage from the free throw line than Celtics' point guard did during the regular season.
- Midseason acquisitions Unstoppable John Salmons and Brad Miller helped the Celts by doing plenty of missing (7-for-27 between them). Several Celts helped the Bulls by doing the same. No shortage of clanked open looks contributed to the two teams' combined 7-for-33 showing from the three-point line.
- Good on the refs for correctly overturning the John Salmons traveling call as an inadvertent whistle.
- Without being in the locker room or in the bench, I can't convince myself that I have any idea about how the issue of Kevin Garnett's location affects the team. Except that the team is better when he is located on the court, of course. As for this locker room-or-bench business, I've got no impetus to question whatever KG, the coaching staff, his teammates and any other parties involved in the choice decide. Seems like a non-issue to me.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i noticed the same thing
when they showed that Rondo graphic of 65 percent after Noah’s 68 percent (i think those were the numbers? pretty sad – especially considering Noah’s ft shot looks exponentially worse than Rondo’s.
also, completely agreed re: TA’s defensive play. excellent work, and good job Doc for making those switches to combat Gordon early enough to keep us in the game – instead of Gordon fully going off as he has done several times in his career during the last few (clutch) minutes of games.
Not a chance Brick
No way do you not play Ray on offense. As Steve noted in this point which I couldn’t agree with more:
It almost goes without saying, but just in case: I had zero problem with him taking the last shot. His body of work has indicated time and again over 15 years that for Ray, every shot is truly the next shot, not a nervous-wreck fling to compensate for the last shot.
Tony Allen vs. Ray Allen on offense of a close game….it’s not even a question. When was the last time Tony Allen helped win a game on offense? Never. TA on defense, Ray on offense, I don’t see how you can play that one any better.
Totally agree. Allen excelled yesterday at exactly what his role is always going to be in this league – come out and slow down a hot shooter for a few possessions. He’s not always as effective at that as he was yesterday, given the ease which he can be faked off the floor.
We needed someone desperately to come in off the bench, muscle Gordon around – which Tony can do – and hit a couple of bombs – which Tony is never going to be able to do. Nonetheless, Allen did what he can as an eighth or ninth man – four good defensive possessions.
As for the Ray-Tony thing, I don’t want the basketball in Tony Allen’s hands in a key spot – ever.
Doc played that situation perfectly, and Tony delivered.
Well, indulge me in a thought experiment
Imagine if Ray Allen’s suspension was for Game 1 yesterday and not for the Philly game last Tuesday. Who else thinks TA couldn’t have improved upon Ray’s 1-12 performance while also providing better defense against Gordon? As crazy as it might seem to some, if TA started yesterday’s game, we win, no question about it.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 19, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
No, that's crazy...
See, Doc would never start TA over Ray in any circumstance other than Ray’s unavailability. That’s why I crouched the thought experiment in terms of Ray being suspended. If that had happened to happen, I think we get the W. But starting TA over Ray next game? Impossible to the Nth degree.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 19, 2009 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions
SaMP, there is definitely a question about it, and something else
That is easy to say in retrospect in a loss in which Ray shot poorly – what’s to say Tony doesn’t screw it up with his turnovers and not scoring anyway.
Either way, Ray provides that (more than) legitimate outside threat which allowed Rondo to constantly penetrate without the Bulls D closing down the lane because they had to stay on Ray on the outside. If that’s TA, no way do we get those points. Add that to Pierce’s struggles and ability to easily get into the lane and shoot those close up jumpers despite missing several, and they would have closed down even more.
No question about it? That’s entirely too conclusive – there are always several possibilities that can play out in any shape, way, or form on that court. Now, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and hope you’re not arguing for TA over Ray, and just saying what “could have potentially, possibly happened.”
Sure, anything's possible...
But TA put up 18 points and 4 assists against Philly last Tuesday against a team that was trying to win. Paul got his points just fine and Rondo did what he needed to do (Rondo got into the lane yesterday because Rose is a terrible defender and the Bulls bigs aren’t that good at covering the basket).
Of course, it’s not as easy as replacing one player for another and ‘assuming’ that that would do the trick and we’d pull out the W. But I’m pretty sure Gordon, or Salmons or Rose, or whomever TA would have been matched up throughout the game would have scored less because TA was out there, and that TA would have been able to get more than 4 points in 40 minutes.
Maybe ‘no question about it’ was too strong of language. But I would have liked our chances. I think TA’s turnover problem is lessened when he’s playing with better players (who handle the ball so he doesn’t have to), while his other attributes—like man-to-man defense, steals, transition buckets, and dribble penetration—get better the more minutes he plays. A ‘normal’ Tony Allen game would have resulted in a win yesterday, had he been starting. Of course, a normal Ray Allen game would have resulted in the same thing, so that’s not saying much. It’s only a thought experiment…
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 19, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Hope Springs Eternal
OK I am as distressed as anyone at the intermittent effort of the C’s particularly the opening dunk and Brad Miller’s uncontested putback. Ray and Eddie missed a lot of shots that they will make on a good, or even average, day. Steph would have had two more assists if Mikki Moore had mad a one footer and Eddie an open 3. ALso bear in mind, Derrick Rose had this unbelievable offensive game and THE BULLS NEEDED EVERY BIT OF IT TO WIN BY 2 POINTS!!!
Yeu Bog Ro
I agree to an extent but...
the bulls also had very poor performances from John Salmons, Brad Miller, and Ben Gordon until the fourth.
then again, as you said, we also had our fair share of poor performances. I’m with you though, I’m not too concerned because of this, I think we can get back on track.
Tony on D
You are right about Tony on Gordon. I was so caught up in the moment that I didn’t notice. Ray’s bad day was on both sides of the ball.
Pierce said all the right things but it was also him that didn’t have that desperaton on every posession that was needed.
But, we win in six.
Anyone watching the Lakers game - as usual if you look at the Lakers
they call a foul on you. What bullshi*.
celtics overated
Without garnett the celtics will fall sorry but they are nothing more than a confident group of over achievers. Bulls are more talented and not so inexperienced as people would like to believe. The bulls will win this series in five
I'm missing the part
where being a confident over achiever qualifies as a bad thing.
-sw
The best of the 2008-09 Boston Celtics is still yet to come. Believe.
by Steve Weinman on Apr 20, 2009 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions

by 





























