Finally Exhaling Game 2
A Daily Babble Production
After taking a day just to catch our breath and come down from the ceiling, we're ready to take a belated look back on all the craziness aside from Ray Allen's smooth shooting in Monday night's 118-115 Celtics win over the Bulls. To the bullet points we go...
- Ben Gordon, please don't do that again. That's a compliment. Just an outstanding offensive performance. For all the parts of his game with which I'm less than enamored, the guy sure can shoot, and he seems to kick another gear in big spots. He earned the nickname Madison Square Gordon between his time at UConn and early days with the Bulls because he shined in Big East games at the World's Most Famous Arena and hit a couple of biggies against the Knicks early in his career. He opened the playoffs at the TD Garden with a 12-point fourth quarter (in which he shot 4-for-5 in the last five minutes) and then a bonkers second game. Gordon hit several high degree-of-difficulty shots and never showed a hint of hesitation. The numbers merit re-posting: 14-for-24 from the field, 6-for-11 on threes, 8-for-9 foul shooting for 42 points without a turnover while managing to quadruple my pulse in the process.
- Speaking of high-degree-of-difficulty shots, I wasn't as disgusted with Ray Allen at the defensive end as I was with Rajon Rondo during Derrick Rose's career day on Saturday. While a couple of Gordon's baskets came off easier looks than I would have liked, Ray for the most part made a real effort to chase Gordon around the floor and make him work for his shots. Gordon had at least one mid-range step-back in particular as well as a couple of other deep jumpers that looked well-covered and were of the "tip your cap and shake his hand" variety.
- That said about Ray's defensive effort, as I watched the game, I shared the wonder that many on you have already expressed about the absence of Tony Allen. As I noted in this space on Sunday, Allen did a nice job in spot work covering Gordon in the opener. I agree with CB member CoachBo that while I'm not TA's biggest fan overall, I like the idea of using him as a situational stopper to give this team a defensive lift in spurts (if and only if he manages to keep his head in the game). But I found the outcry about Doc Rivers' choice not to use TA a bit surprising: My expectation was that, as The Guru noted on the phone after the game, no matter what Doc did, it would be considered good enough if the Celts hung on to win and second-guessed to the end of time in a loss (which isn't necessarily fair but often is a natural reaction for us as observers).
While there's a discussion to be had about how using TA in the second quarter would have affected Doc's willingness to use him later on, strictly from the standpoint of the fourth quarter alone, I'm fairly non-committal about the handling of the rotation there. Allen offers the highest utility in late-game offense-defense situations when there tend to be stoppages on nearly an every-possession basis, so as to allow Doc to keep his starters and possibly shooter Eddie House in the game at the offensive end. Prior to scoring the Bulls' final 12 points of the game beginning with 3:43 left, Gordon scored just two points in the fourth quarter, so I'm not sure there was much call for TA before that point in the period.
Gordon then hit two threes in a span of 30 seconds without a stoppage occurring, and I don't buy that it was up to Doc anywhere in that span to call a timeout to get Allen in the game before an offensive possession. That would have meant taking out either his point guard (not only en route to a triple-double but playing on an injury that Rivers said wouldn't allow him to come out of the game for fear of having it swell up), one of his two star swingmen, a power forward having a breakout offensive game or his defense-anchoring center. While I recognize Celtics Hub's Brendan Jackson's point that TA offers offensive value in his ability to slash and draw fouls (as Jeff noted yesterday, this is a fine read), I'm not second-guessing Doc in that spot. Or for not putting Allen on the floor right after the Celtics did call timeout, down five with 3:11 to play at that point.
On the other hand, in the game's final two minutes, the Bulls began three possessions out of timeouts and a fourth after two free throws for the Infuriated Infant. Gordon hit shots on three of those four possessions, and the Celtics did have the timeouts left to utilize TA defensively and then stop play for a personnel change on offense in at least some of those instances if need be.
At the end of the day, I found myself intrigued that Doc didn't look to use TA at all save for four seconds at the end of the first half, but I wasn't by any means screaming at my television. Five paragraphs seems like more than enough hindsight over-analysis for me for a line of decision-making that ultimately didn't haunt the Celtics, though I welcome all perspectives on this from the readership.
- Much better defensive game from Rajon Rondo than we saw in the opener. This is good.
- Crazy game from Rondo across the board: With all the late-game excitement, it (embarrassingly) managed to escape me until well after the fact that Raj had put up a bonkers 19-12-16 triple-double. Seven of those rebounds came at the offensive end, and one loomed particularly large (when he grabbed his own miss outside the left elbow and flipped to Ray Allen for the trey to put the Celts up 115-113). This would have been a fine performance for a guy playing on two good ankles. On one? Wow.
- Only one real Rondo complaint (call me nitpicky if you must): a set of two atrocious possessions in the final 90 seconds, though both ended well. With the Celtics down one, Rondo killed the entire shot clock dribbling without ever bringing the ball below the foul line, only to force up a jumper from the left wing as the clock wound down. I screamed "Noooo!" as it went up and "Yes!" as it went through the hoop. Doc appeared to be yelling at Rondo on the sidelines during the ensuing timeout, and if it went anything along the lines of "Big shot, but that's absolutely not the type of possession we need there," I'm all for it. But the next time down, with the Celtics again trailing by one, we saw the same scenario unfold. Dribble, dribble, dribble, Rondo jumper, which simply isn't the shot the Celtics want to have rely on in that spot (though it's certainly getting better). This time, of course, Raj solved the problem by tracking down the carom and flipping the ball to Ray for the trey. Again, the youngster played a great game, and even the two possessions I'm annoyed with worked out. But I'd be lying if I said I didn't come away from that sequence feeling a bit unsettled.
- Derrick Rose moves at insane speeds. When Paul Pierce forced a Chicago turnover to set up a one-on-none lay-up for Rondo, Rose sprinted from deep in his frontcourt all the way down the floor and got to within a hair of catching Rondo. While it should be noted that Rondo's speed was limited because of his ankle injury and that he took the extra time to cross the lane and to get to the right side, watching the rookie point guard zoom down the floor still qualified as quite a sight to behold.
- Underrated on the list of reasons to be thrilled that Brian Scalabrine will be returning to uniform on Thursday: We won't have to witness the redhead sitting on the bench as some sort of mutant cross between a pumpkin and a garbage man. I realize that this is the second day in a row that I've commented on another fellow's fashion, which is normally outside my range of analysis, but good gosh, Scal. Monday's performance was a travesty for a guy making NBA money.
- Speaking of inactive list members present on the bench, great to see Kevin Garnett looking fired up again. Probably not so great for TNT's family audiences that the cameras managed to turn to him right in the middle of a couple of vintage KG, er, pep talks, shall we say. Multiple people in the we-don't-care-about-pro-hoops Midwest approached me yesterday just to inform me of what they read on Garnett's lips. I'll leave those worries to the people running the broadcast. It sure felt reassuring to see KG back on his feet and in everyone's ear rather than sitting with the sullen expression he rocked on Saturday.
- Credit Stephon Marbury for doing a good job sprinting back to turn what would have been a three-on-none into a three-on-one break in the second quarter. The Bulls wound up throwing the ball away. Without Marbury hustling to get back in the play, there is no need for a pass, and the possession likely ends in a lay-up.
- Besides that play, a little more working to get back to the defensive end in fast-break situations for the Bulls wouldn't have killed anyone in green and white in general.
- Back to Marbury: He should have taken the wide open right-elbow jumper he passed up in the second quarter when he chose to dish to Leon Powe for a contested lay-up instead. But given that he saw Brad Miller take a small step toward him and thought he might keep coming, I understand looking to get an even higher percentage shot down low. I'm still happier seeing Steph guilty of not enough selfishness rather than having it be the other way around.
- He still needs to get a bit smarter about certain things on the court (the foul on Pierce at the end of Game 1 and the technical he picked up in Game 2 come to mind), but I'd take a guy like Joakim Noah on my team any day.
- Tyrus Thomas, super-athlete. Several of his six blocks required awe-striking leaping ability and timing. One note: The Bulls gained immediate possession on exactly one of Thomas' swats. A second came at the end of a quarter. The other four resulted in two offensive rebounds by the Celtics and two balls sent out of bounds that remained in the Celtics' possession.
- Congratulations to Vinny Del Negro for running out of timeouts at the end of regulation twice in three days. We're still waiting for word about how he spent his Sunday, so this stat may have to be updated.
- Great, great, great job on the offensive glass. Led by seven o-boards apiece for their biggest (Kendrick Perkins) and smallest (Rondo) players, the Celtics collected nearly 43 percent of their opportunities on the offensive glass for an astounding 21 extra chances. That turned into no shortage of second-chance points, especially for Perk, Rondo and the Infuriated Infant in the early going. The Bulls as a team only grabbed eight offensive boards of their own.
- Oh Baby! The Large Baby turned in an excellent performance, knocking down his jump shots and making several moves to the basket that demonstrated an agility defying his bulky physique. Watching him grow as a player seems to get even more fun with each passing day.
- Perk submitted another set of important contributions. He worked the glass, took good shots without over-dribbling inside and hit a short jump hook to put the Celts ahead by one in the last six minutes of the fourth quarter.
- The Bulls now sit at 46-of-51 from the foul line in this series. The Celtics are 38-for-52. The two games were decided by a total of five points.
- Get well soon, Leon Powe. We'll miss you.
In case you're looking for a pick-me-up for your midweek work day while wishing time would fly to tomorrow night's game, this might help.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff, Steve
That was the mother of all Game 2 recaps.
Re: TA. The only problem I had was him not getting off the bench in the first half (when we were forced to go small with 3 minutes left, he absolutely should have gotten the call) and the fact that Doc didn’t do an offense/defense substitution for the last 2 Bulls possessions (which were both bookended by timeouts and which both ended in Gordon jumpers). If you remember back to the first Detroit game in the 07’-08’ season, Doc brought a cold TA into the last possession against Detroit and TA ended up biting on a Billups fake, sending him to the line to eventually win the game. After that game, Doc blamed himself for not playing TA earlier in the game, as he thought TA was cold and bit on the fake as a result (being anxious in his first seconds of playing time)…and I guarantee those same concerns cropped up on Monday. Problem is, there were multiple times Doc could have subbed TA into the game in the first half, but he was too caught up trying to get Marbury going and too in love with the possibility that Eddie might hit a 3 to see that we were having defensive problems…
And that’s probably my overall issue with Doc regarding TA…Doc knows we’re a defensive team first and that lower scoring games favor us (and that high scoring games favor Chicago), yet he can’t find time for his best perimeter defender in a game where he’s getting torched from the perimeter. Yet he plays a guy like Eddie House, who basically has to outscore whomever’s he’s guarding in order to be effective. Sure, Eddie’s had a career year, but I’d rather we be a defensive team first….playing Eddie big minutes is counterproductive to that end…
As for the proclamation that Marbury has played the best defense on Gordon…I really don’t know what to say…Marbury’s defense has been good, sure, but didn’t TA completely deny Gordon touches down the stretch of Game 1? Has Marbury done that? Has anybody been able to do that? No. Marbury forced Gordon into tough shots, which he happened to miss. Ray forced Gordon into tough shots, which he happened to hit. Against Gordon, especially when he gets it going, it would seem that the best defense you could play would be ball denial, something TA does better than any other Celtic…
I’m really glad you wrote a few words about Baby’s night. Sure, he wasn’t especially efficient, and he did shoot a lot, but what I loved from him was his willingness to take big shots. This man has supreme confidence. And while Doc et al has tried to get him to focus foremost on the little things, like setting picks, blitzing the pick and roll, and rebounding, in reality Baby’s greatest gift as a basketball player is his ability to score. He’s such a strange package to defend: rotund, nimble, strong, quick, squat, with tumbling spins moves and finishes with his off hand. The ability to hit the 15-footer has really opened up his game, and now all the other little moves he has around the basket are coming to life.
Another unreported aspect of this game was Baby’s pick-and-roll defense. Sure, Rondo was more mindful of staying in front of Rose, but I thought Baby was super-aggressive blitzing Rose as the screen was being set. He wasn’t giving any half-hearted efforts like he had in Game 1. When Baby plays with energy, he can be a hell of a player. He played with energy all game on Monday. That’s great stuff. Baby’s one of those players who plays better in big games and I think we’re going to see some pretty big games from him the rest of this series…
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 22, 2009 2:01 PM EDT reply actions
The Best Way To Defend Gorden When He's In The "Zone"
It might be to not defend him. Some guys need a hand in the face to hit the shot. Maybe giving Gorden real open looks could throw him off.
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
Brilliant and complete post, Professor. I don’t know if I can add anything to it….So I won’t.
I do think Rivers was completely outcoached for about 95 minutes….The no timeouts left saved Rivers from a possible 96.
The only observation I can make about this Marbury defense thing is that Rivers must be on some rabid Marbury self-esteem kick. Rivers has been falling all over himself with Marbury praise in spite of the fact that Marbury for the most part has, well……sucked. Marbury is trying defensively….I’ll give him that. That makes his defense Artestesque compared to anytime in his NBA career. But he probably hasn’t played meaningful defense since grade school.
With the very favorable schedule from here on in I see us winning the next 3 games. If Rondo is in the same shape he was last game we can bank on it. The Orlando/Philly series is going 7 so we have a great opportunity to get rest.
Baby is working his way into a Perk-type contract. I think he’ll get 4-5 very good NBA years out of his body and he’s basically toast. But if he loses his bulk he’s out of the league. So hopefully he gets a 3-4-5 year deal…..from us.
Good article, as usual
Thanks Steve, it’s always a pleasure to read your analysis and I often learn things that I hadn’t noticed in the game.
For example, I didn’t know that the Celtics had missed so many free throws through these two games and I hope they’ll get back on track with their shooting there because in close games like this, missed free throws clearly hurt.
A tip of the cap, Professor
For another well-done, thorough and accurate analysis.
I do concur, completely, that Doc must find the appropriate situations to use Tony as a situational defender. Given the sheer numbers crunch that we’re in, the luxury of picking and choosing playing time has to give way to more of a “where I can use this guy’s strengths?” question for short periods of time.
One Thought On TA Defending Gorden Instead Of Ray
One way to stop Gordon is to make him play defense. He spent all nite last game running after Ray, running into picks, etc. Ray had to do the same. Ray didn’t score in the first half because he wasn’t getting the ball in rhythm. Gordon doesn’t seem to need that. With both guys running each other into the ground they, especially Gordon just had an unbelievable nite. With TA guarding Gorden, Gorden would need to use less energy to guard TA because they don’t respect him as an outside scorer. TA could go to the basket against Gordon, but the Bulls have done a great job of defending the basket. TA might stop a few hits by Gordon, but I think I’d rather have Ray defend him. Ray didn’t do a bad job. Gordon made unbelievable shots. The help defense also wasn’t there as it should have been. This is a place where we just need to accept the fact that KG playing would change these dynamics.
So should TA play more or not to me is a non subject. If we were playing well as a team TA could be effective, but we are not and TA would need to do one on one offensive stuff and I don’t think that would work here. And at the other end, if the whole team isn’t playing well defensively, then TA one on one won’t accomplish that much. We corrected the Rose situation by Rondo realizing he must stay in front of him. As the series goes on I expect the C’s to play better as a team and then TA could help.
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Apr 22, 2009 7:51 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 





























