Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin Sets Assist High In Easy Win Over Sacramento

Heart of The Truth

A Daily Babble Production

Paul Pierce's performance last night left plenty to be desired.  His effort didn't.

Pierce is the captain and leader of this Celtics team, and he bears plenty of responsibility for the ending of the triple-overtime thriller that amounted to a 128-127 Game 6 loss to the Chicago Bulls.  The two turnovers in the third overtime along with the foul on Joakim Noah's breakaway dunk that disqualified him from the game come to mind right away.  There are some valid questions to be asked about other aspects of his play on Thursday night as well.

There are none about his heart.  Or his "interest level."  Or how much he cares.

His defense wasn't at its best all night. After all, Unstoppable John Salmons went for 35 points on 13-for-22 shooting, many of which came against Pierce early in the game before the Bulls went small to change match-ups and then forced switches on screens for some of Salmons's later buckets.  Credit the Killer Goatee for hitting his share of difficult shots as well.  But when push came to shove down the stretch, Pierce kicked another gear at that end of the floor.  As the Celtics rumbled back from a 12-point fourth quarter deficit, the captain locked in on Salmons, limiting his free space.  Salmons finished with just three points for the quarter, albeit on a big and-one aided by a Kendrick Perkins foul that brought the Bulls to within three points.

Playing with five fouls throughout much of the second and third overtimes, Pierce refused to give up any ground or laze off at the defensive end. With the Bulls leading by three in the final two minutes of double overtime, Pierce stuck with Unstoppable John every step of the way into the lane and blocked his jumper.  On a couple of other occasions, he stayed tight enough to prevent the Goatee from getting a shot off.

Twice he jumped lanes to poke away Chicago passes to the wings.  On the first of those occasions, he careened at full speed into the courtside seats trying to save the ball out of bounds.  The second time, he knocked the ball into the Bulls' backcourt but came up short on his dive as multiple Bulls sprinting back corralled the ball.  Those plays won't show up in the box score.  But they left little room for interpretation about his work ethic in this game.

Again, there is no claim here that Pierce did a world-class job in terms of defensive effectiveness.  Unstoppable John Salmons scored his points.  But for the most part, Pierce made him work for them.

On a night when he went to the locker room in the midst of the third quarter with blood dripping from his face, Paul Pierce logged 50-plus minutes for the third consecutive game.  He drew double-team after double-team every time he touched the ball, and the results were largely bad - several missed shots and a couple of costly turnovers.  He also hit four crucial foul shots to erase a deficit in the final two minutes of the first overtime period.

No matter what happened on the previous play, as the exhaustion moved nearer to its peak, the captain continued to push his body further through the pounding.

The results weren't there for Paul Pierce last night.  But the spirit that was left me coming away from last night's game as proud as ever to root for the defining face of this era of Celtics basketball.

Star-divide

My brain feels more deep-fried than the delicious Oreo zeppoles I stumbled across yesterday afternoon, and seven periods of basketball are blurring together in my mind.  Nonetheless, let's take a shot at conveying the rest of the thoughts from a game that makes me feel unjustified in using the term "thriller" for any of the previous contests in this series:

  • If not for my urge to shower The Truth with some love, Brad Miller would have been the primary subject of today's piece, and he earned it.  This guy is one tough dude.  He bounced back from Tuesday night's stitches and waning-seconds missed free throws with a superb performance that included two more three-pointers, the Bulls' final five points in regulation and a perfect set of five attempts at the free throw stripe.  Final line: 8-for-9 from the field, 2-for-2 on threes, 5-for-5 foul shooting, 23 points, 10 rebounds, plus-26.  Since I cracked wise on Monday about his three-point shooting, it's worth noting that he has hit five of six attempts in this series, the only miss coming on his 80-foot fling at the regulation buzzer after Paul Pierce missed a free throw.  Fine job by big bad Brad.
  • Another nominee for today's focus: the smoothest dude alive.  When Ray Allen's three bottomed to tie the game late in double overtime, I couldn't do much beyond burying my head in my shirt and mumbling to myself, "That trade has worked out well so far."  I don't have the words this morning to do his play justice.  Out-of-this-world performance, Ray.
  • Possibly lost in the shuffle of all that went on later: With the Celtics struggling in the first quarter, Brian Scalabrine drained a three, recognized a mismatch and went to the right block for a lay-up and hit two foul shots a possession later.  That's seven points in less than two minutes.
  • In addition to banking in a left-wing three, the Killer Goatee also converted a three-point play on which the contact of the foul caused him to leave his lay-up attempt short off the front rim, yet the ball rolled up, over and in for the basket.  That was the most awing of a series of impressive plays Unstoppable John Salmons made in this contest.
  • All three members of the Celtics' starting frontcourt fouled out of this game, and still the fact that Mikki Moore played less than three minutes is no criticism of Doc Rivers.  Nope, just a sad reflection of what Mikki brings to the table at this point.
  • Speaking of criticisms of Doc, I find the in-hindsight contention that it was a no-brainer to leave the Infuriated Infant in the game rather than inserting Tony Allen in the fourth quarter a bit unfair.  While I've made it clear that TA's particular brand of play nauseates me more often than not, this struck me as far more of a pick-your-poison situation than an open-and-shut case.  When the Bulls have gone small in this series, Unstoppable John Salmons has moved to the four spot and given the Celtics' bigs fits, namely Scalabrine and Glen Davis.  TA has done some good (and some disastrous) spot work on defense in this series, and I wonder if we would be singing a different tune if Doc had left Large Baby in the game only to see the Bulls torch the green defense.  Clearly, Doc's call didn't work out, but I don't buy that he did as egregious a job as I've seen asserted since last night. 
  • Yet again, Doc did a fine job drawing up plays out of timeouts.  It isn't his fault Eddie House didn't make sure he got behind the line before spotting up for his jumper in triple overtime.  The Celtics got looks when they needed them down the stretch.  As far as going to Rondo rather than Ray on the last play is concerned, in addition to the fact that I don't know all the options that design featured, it's worth remembering that Chicago also might have been aware that Ray Allen was the Celtics' top scorer that night.  While this isn't a suggestion to go away from him simply because the Bulls would try to cover him, it seems worth noting that these situations aren't as simple as "Just give it to Ray."
  • TA took and missed two of the Celtics' last three shots in regulation, but both also came with the shot clock expiring and little other choice to make.  I wasn't enamored with his play, but even when he was on the floor, he wasn't solely to blame.
  • In the interest of full disclosure before the TA bash party gets out of control, the reverse alley-oop in the third quarter was sweet.
  • As Doug Collins pointed out on TNT, the Celtics would be well served to look to force a switch on Paul Pierce anytime he is being taken by Kirk Hinrich when trying to isolate.  Hinrich continues to play rugged defense.
  • Rajon Rondo has been fantastic throughout much of this series, but that doesn't absolve his decision-making from meriting the "suspect" label on several occasions on this night.  He was lucky to stick around past the first quarter, and his shot selection (particularly on the game's penultimate play) could have been a lot better.  At the same time, he continued to add another dimension to this team with his work on the boards and also handed out 19 assists without giving the ball away once.  Some up, some down for the man averaging a triple-double in this series.  If this is his rough night for the week, I'll take it without further complaint.
  • Postscript to previous bullet: In the (presumably unlikely) event that Rondo finds himself ineligible to play on Saturday night, I would consider that his rough night for the week.  And my further complaints would not be with the league office.
  • I hate wasting a rough shooting night for Ben Gordon that also included foul trouble (and an eventual disqualification) as well as a technical for kicking a Gatorade cooler.  He will be more of a problem on Saturday.
  • Derrick Rose played 59 minutes, put up a 28-8-7 and made the defensive play of the night with his block on Rondo's jumper in the final seconds.  Hard to imagine that Chicago fans won't forgive another five turnovers and a couple of missed freebies at the end.  Seems to be a likable dude, too.
  • After playing perhaps the most disciplined game of his career on Tuesday, Kendrick Perkins reverted to form with another few foolish fouls.  He also didn't do much to prevent Brad Miller's five points at the end of regulation to force overtime. But if not for Perk, the Celtics may have never gotten to that point in the first place.  He played stout defense on the interior during the Celtics' big comeback run in the fourth quarter and even stepped out to block an Unstoppable John Salmons trey attempt down the stretch.  Perk arrived to meet all comers in the paint over a several-minute span as the green marched back into this one.  Good on him for that.
  • Excellent run to erase a double-digit fourth-quarter deficit for the second time in as many games.  Less excellent to a) accrue such a deficit once more and b) blow an eight-point lead after erasing said deficit.  Still, the Celtics scored 18 straight points over a six-minute span in the fourth quarter.  This was really cool.
  • On consecutive possessions in the first overtime, the Bulls' defense stifled the Celtics' offense to the point of forcing the C's to resort to Kendrick Perkins jumpers from 10 feet and beyond at the end of the shot clock both times.
  • The two teams combined to turn the ball over 30 times in 63 minutes.  Good work taking care of the rock.
  • While it would have been nice for him to get his feet behind the line, I still can't help but marvel at Eddie House's ability to come right off the bench and shoot as smoothly as he did on the jumper that brought the Celtics' within one late in triple overtime.  He looked putrid on his first three attempts early in the game, came in cold and nailed a bucket right away.  Confidence indeed.
  • Large Baby's impending paycheck this summer seems to rise with each passing game.  The shot clock-beater with 40 seconds left in the first overtime and the and-one lay-up early in the third overtime stand out as two of several high-significance plays made by the Nasty Newborn.  He had another shot bounce off the rim several times before dropping, and he even knocked down a couple of turnaround jumpers that he created for himself.  Pugnacious Papoose!
  • Great play, Joakim.

At some point, I would love to see a tally of the mileage I've covered while pacing three steps side to side in my living room over the course of this series.  Tomorrow night will only see that total rise.

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bill Simmons latest

Short and sweet for a change.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/090501&sportCat=nba

If the Cowboys could only play like a team with passion and unity like my beloved
Boston Celtics, I would be happy.

by Captain Comeback on May 1, 2009 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I hate this series and want it to be over.

Worst off I’m going to Bermuda tomorrow morning and have to wait until 9:00pm to watch the game. (Bermuda’s and hour ahead). If I did the math correctly that should put me up until 4:17AM assuming this game has six OT’s. I hate it and I can’t take it anymore. I hate Noah so much. More than Bill Lambier.

If the Cowboys could only play like a team with passion and unity like my beloved
Boston Celtics, I would be happy.

by Captain Comeback on May 1, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

"Large Baby's impending paycheck this summer seems to rise with each passing game."

Hmm, 1 defensive rebound in 53 minutes from L’Enfant Terrible. Don’t know how much that is worth.

by MattD on May 1, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Tony Allen bashing

Tony is one of the few people out there fast enough to play defense (and that’s after having his knee ripped apart.)

How about people waiting until the shot clock was down and then dumping it off on Tony? How about Rondo thinking that he was 10 foot tall and driving into the lane without passing it off (and getting it stuffed back in his face)?

Tony was Big 12 player of the year, 2 years in a row – but you guys are right – he can’t play ball.

It’s just easier to beat up on him than your favorite pets.

WHAT we should be doing (and hopefully will in game 7) – is playing more of Tony EARLY – so that maybe it isn’t a tied game going down the stretch……

Like Doc said – we are playing pathetic defense.

by Nc on May 1, 2009 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

plus the plus/minus with TA on the court?

We had all moment and were pulling away until TA went into the game. He didnt shut anyone down. he looks lost on defense, and he over reacts to every pump fake and pivot. He’s out of control most of the time trying to make a super star play – but he’s a not a super star play. Sure occasionally he makes a great play, but when you try to hit a homer every at bat, you’re bound to hit a few.

There’s been plenty of times in this series, that TA has come in, and has taken the ball and looked to score first, instead of making a play for his teammates. In game 5, it was disgusting watching him drive to the basket.

Yeah last night he had a couple unlucky shots because the ball was dumped to him, but there is a reason the bulls arent guarding him.

The bulls aren’t guarding TA and he still cant score! That should tell you something.

by bob3698 on May 1, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're wrong in almost everything you say

+/- is a flawed stat. For a guy like TA, who plays in a lot of late game defensive situations, he’s only going to get a zero or negative +/- no matter what he does. A guy like E House, who plays in a lot of late game offensive situations, is only going to get a zero or positive +/- no matter what he does (and he hasn’t done anything for 6 games).

We had already lost 5 points off our 99-91 lead when TA came in the game. The momentum had already shifted. And you know why? Because the Bulls went small and reeled off 5 straight points because we couldn’t matchup with Salmons at the 4.

TA has almost universally NOT looked for his shot the entire series. The dude took 1 shot in the first 4 games and only shot down the stretch because he was handed the ball with less than 5 seconds on the shot clock. In fact, he’s done a good job getting others involved. I’m sure you remember the first play of overtime when he drove the lane and passed it to Perk for a dunk.

THE BOTTOM LINES OF BOTTOM LINES IS THIS:

We will win with defense. TA plays the best defense of any wing off the bench. Because Chicago has a distinct quickness advantage on the perimeter and 4 guys who can either shoot with range or penetrate at will, it’s an ABSOLUTE MUST that TA get the bulk of the 2/3 minutes in game 7. It’s an ABSOLUTE MUST that he get early minutes so as to be in the flow should Chicago go small and put Salmons at the 4. Marbury, who’s been decent on defense (and a million times better than E House in that respect), should play PG when Rondo needs to sit or play shooting guard when we need a little more scoring. Eddie House should be a pure late game situational bomber and nothing more in this series.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on May 1, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus and minus is a flawed stat.

But predictably, the defenders here are missing one key fact: Tony Allen has no outside shot and a very limited offensive repertoire in general.

I have no issue with going small. Doc went small with the wrong guy, and it cost us the basketball game.

The obvious move in that situation was Marbury, whose defense can approximate our great stopper-who-is-really-erratic-defensively.

You cannot play 3 on 5 offensively,. It changes the defensive dynamics for your opponent and makes you MUCH easier to defend – as was clearly demonstrated last night.

Going small was fine. Going small with Tony was a mistake that cost us the game in regulation.

by CoachBo on May 1, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

You really think “Going small with Tony was a mistake that cost us the game in regulation.”? What about leaving Miller wide open for a 3, or letting him waltz into the lane for the tying bucket? Or how about Salmons getting to the rim on Baby for an And-1 because the Bulls had gone small and Doc hadn’t matched up? Or how about the way we tried to let the air out of the ball and ended up having 3 worthless possessions down the stretch? I mean, there’s plenty of blame to go around and to pin in on TA seems more to do with a personal dislike than an objective truth. I’m not picking on you, though; the ENTIRE Internet, other than me and like 4 others, probably thinks or has written the same thing. I just think EVERYBODY’S crazy on this point.

I agree Marbury would have been a good alternative to TA and if Doc would have went with him down the stretch I wouldn’t have complained. That said, Marbury airballed a 4 foot runner last night, so I’m not sure he would have done any better.

As for 3-on-5 basketball, sure, you can say that Perk and TA weren’t being defended. But Doc would counter with the fact that he wanted his best defenders in there at the end and that’s why it was Perk and TA instead of Baby and Marbury. Personally, I agree with Doc; you win with defense. Unfortunately, it was Perk, not TA, who made two critical defensive mistakes down the stretch. Why not say it was Perk staying in the game at the expense of Baby that was the deciding substitution that cost us the game in regulation?

Frankly, if we want to talk about subs costing us the game, I’d point to Eddie House’s defense at the beginning of the 4th quarter. Marbury AND House were in when the deficit went from 4 to 12 points. If TA’s in there, maybe that lead doesn’t get to double digits.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on May 1, 2009 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Thanks NC. You’ve restored my faith in humanity.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on May 1, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

above comment

wasn’t aimed at Steve – it was a pre-emptory strike at the bashers….

Steve was pretty on the mark (except NOT giving enough credit to Tony shutting down the offensive players.)

There’s a reason why Tony is always guarding their best shooters at the end of the game – he’s our best defender right now. Yes, he shouldn’t have fouled the other night o n the three – but nobody else on our team is good enough to even be out there defending Gordon.

Check the point totals on whoever he does get to guard AND what minutes he guarded them -

Tony also gets in the middle and causes a lot of other turnovers and changed shots – they just don’t show up in the box scores

by Nc on May 1, 2009 1:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Welcome back, Nanc...

…been wondering when you’d make your return.

Thanks for sharing the thoughts, though as you might imagine, you and I remain – to put it mildly – on rather different wavelengths regards TA in general.

-sw

The best of the 2008-09 Boston Celtics is still yet to come. Believe.

by Steve Weinman on May 1, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mikki has one All-NBA 1st Team Skill.....

…and that skill is fouling.

One of my biggest grievances with Doc in this game was not subbing in Mikki to intentionally foul late in the 1st (? i think it was the 1st) OT. Instead Big Baby picked up two consecutive fouls, his 4th and 5th fouls as the Celts ended up fouling twice since they had one to give. Why not sub Mikki in? He’s fantastic at fouling. He admits it himself. Instead BBD fouled out and our 3rd OT lineup was a laughing stock.

Also I understand Doc’s motivation for putting TA in the game late, but I totally disagree with it. Baby was absolutely destroying the Bulls, the Celts should have stayed Big and let the Bulls adjust.

When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"

by Green17 on May 1, 2009 2:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Mental Breakdown

Doc and pp, you can’t make up for these.

by Celtic33@FLA. on May 1, 2009 2:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Good Post

This is the first time that I have been impressed. Sometime you are too deep for me. It’s not your fault, it’s my brain (lol)

by Celtic33@FLA. on May 1, 2009 2:34 PM EDT reply actions  

too deep?

I’m not sure I follow.

Glad you enjoyed the post.

-sw

The best of the 2008-09 Boston Celtics is still yet to come. Believe.

by Steve Weinman on May 1, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

you speak the truth Steve..

Thanks Steve..the moment the foul was called on Paul as he tried, in vain, to chase down Noah..I said aloud “what were you thinking?”…Your post put it all into perspective…I’m sure, in time, I would have credit his effort but, that requires reasoned thought and that wasn’t available to me last night..

by Fastbreak1 on May 1, 2009 2:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Nor should it have been

It took me a few hours of cooling down before I could sit down and write anything even approaching coherent.

Win or lose, there’s a “coming-down” period off of games like this from an adrenaline standpoint – even as a fan.

Glad you enjoyed, Fb1.

-sw

The best of the 2008-09 Boston Celtics is still yet to come. Believe.

by Steve Weinman on May 1, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Love Paul Pierce, but....

Pierce has been downright frustrating to watch lately…Pierce has struggled against that hedge defender that comes to double team off picks…He keeps turning the ball over on faulty dribbling. I love Pierce but he is effective within the flow of the offense. They need to get him coming off screens – not 1 on 1 and Isolations. He is not MJ or Kobe and this is not Phil Jackson’s triangle offense.

His Defense has been below average in the last 20 – 25 games as well. He was big in game 5 making those late game shots but in my opinion, this has been his worst series of his career.

This is hard for me to say too…He is one of my favorites…

by oliveira311 on May 1, 2009 3:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Good point

As you say, the effort WAS there in the 4th and beyond. And it wasn’t good enough. Some mental lapses at key moments, some physical lapses. It happens… nobody’s perfect.

Here’s my problem: Why does Paul Pierce wait till the 4th quarter to turn it on, game after game after game? Sometimes that works, sometimes it doesn’t. But why do that??? That IS an effort / “interest level” issue.

by DRJ1 on May 1, 2009 4:13 PM EDT reply actions  

For once it was nice not to have to talk about the officials

The officials were really good and I wish we could have that same crew on Saturday.

That said, I do have a couple gripes: Rondo and Hinrich should have both received techs. Rondo instigated and Hinrich retaliated. By giving Rondo the Flagrant 1 and letting Hinrich off with a tech, the officials were sending the implied message that it’s OK to retaliate. That’s the wrong message to be sending.

Also, after Rose’s great block of Rondo, Kirk Hinrich, once again, basically tackled Rondo, just like he did with less than 10 seconds left in Game 1. Rondo was just getting the ball back after the block when Hinrich jumped on him and knocked him down, allowing Rose to get the ball and race it up court. Coming as it did after Pierce’s questionable (and eminently cheap) foul on Noah (after the refs had basically let everything else go in the 3rd overtime period), I thought they should have called a foul on the tackle (just as they should have in game 1).

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on May 1, 2009 5:34 PM EDT reply actions  

lol its funny how some celtic fans and others want to turn on a guy that had been the only face of the celtics before KG arrived. Not only that, without out pierce the celts would not have raised banner 17 last year, yea KG helped but pierce was mister clutch in the finals last year. now he has to be subject to ridicule for his play or lack there of I should say but Rondo, who was averaging a triple double in the series did absolutely nothing all night.

by fundamentalsofthegame on May 1, 2009 7:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Is Rondo paying the NBA or something?

What’s wrong with this league? Rondo THREW Hinrich into the scorers table!!!!! How is that OK?? Of course Hinrich is gonna be mad…He just freakin got thrown by the guy who took out his teammate last game!!! Seriously, what is wrong with Rondo? He’s starting to look more and more like a dirty player the longer this series goes on…he looks so innocent, but some of the things he is doing are ridiculous….
SalmonAndMashedPotatoes- Dude there is no way both should just get techs..Rondo deserved the flagrant. Yes he just instigated, but what did he do to instigate again?….Oh yeah he THREW a guy off to the sideline…of course Hinrich is gonna retaliate. I think Rondo is lucky he didn’t get suspended. I would saying throwing someone is pretty close to elbowing them…
Props to Brad Miller…He came up big late in the game, which was good to see after getting jipped last game with the simple shooting foul…….(foul by Rondo….hmmmmm)

by NBA FAN on May 1, 2009 7:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Dude, seriously

You’re overdramatizing the situation and NOBODY likes a drama queen. Rondo did not THROW Hinrich. Hinrich pinched down on Rondo’s arm as they were boxing each other out, and Rondo tried to extricate his arm by ripping it from his grasps. At that point, both players lost their balance; Hinrich lost his balance because he was boxing out super-physically and Rondo was attempting to get away. As Hinrich fell into him, Rondo—still be pinched by the arm—spun Hinrich away from him to avoid a collision. And then Hinrich bumped into the scorer’s table and came back to shove Rondo.

So, Rondo instigated the action which spun Hinrich into the scorer’s table (the momentum of which was created by Hinrich’s overly-physical box-out) and Hinrich retaliated by shoving him. Tit for tat. They should have both gotten techs, that’s all.

As for, “I’d say throwing someone is pretty close to elbowing them…” I’d retort that shoving someone is even closer.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on May 1, 2009 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you! I have felt sick at the way people have turned on Paul, but I realize those people are fans who probably only started watching the Celtics last season or this season. That kind of annoys me even more though. Paul Pierce is a warrior, and he wont go down without a fight. Win or lose, I’m proud of him, and I"m proud of the way this team has played and not given up, and not packed it in, and made excuses that they havent been at full strength. They just go out there and play like the Champions that they are.

Whoever is at the game tomorrow night… We have to keep that place rocking likes its never been before.. We need to be in it from the start non stop. The Celtics need us now. The crowd better bring it, and the way the old Garden would. We need to will this team to a blow out win.

by coreasaurusrex on May 1, 2009 7:54 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm laughing

But mainly cuz I’ve had a few. To wit…
If you really think Tony Allen is the magical missing piece to the team’s success, you are not watching the game. Tony Allen, whom I used to believe in, simply has NO basketball IQ to be trusted in this series. He’s a brain fart waiting to happen.
Pierce is gassed, winded, possibly injured, and just not 100 percent. He’s not perfect, far from it, but I forgive him for the oh so many things he still does (including the previous game, which was magical).
Um, yes, Rondo did throw Hinrich. Maybe not overly aggressively, maybe not a Flagrant 2 intentionally, but the there are blind children in the French countryside who knew that he yanked Hinrich (who’s not blameless). It was a borderline punkish move. Hopefully he’ll learn better to temper his play when being provoked. As Doc put it, he needs to keep his composure.

by Big_Easy on May 1, 2009 11:22 PM EDT reply actions  

shuttlesworth 34

for more than five years ive been defending pierce as one of the top players in the league…before that he was an up and commer…..his ability to take over a game is absolutely unparrallell in the nba. every aspect he can and will dominate….before the KG trade, the only player in the league i trade paul for is kobe…and thats even a trade i shoot down. when Kg came, pauls natural game came so much more naturally for him. after the inevitable championship with these two, paul worked twice as hard, almost at a KG level to be able to play along side him for an extended time. no one could stop this team with a healthy KG. but after the injury, something changed. pauls energy isnt even close to the level it was three years ago when he was fighting on a losing team.
       players like brandon roy emulate his game, but can never match it. id love to see roy settle for a fadeaway with three guys in his face near the end of a decisive playoff game. (i expected the triple team, but in no way did i expect a fade away from two feet beyond the elbow.)
       ray allen was insane this game, but he didnt have to be. with a player like pierce, ray allen should be able to just be ray allen and the team could come away with a W… pierce is playing at a level i have never seen before and i dont think he has experienced before. he is letting the game control him instead of him going out and taking control of the game.
      in short, his sweet spot has been so wide open for years because of his ability to drive past it, read the defense and do whatever it takes to get the bucket. anyone can shoot from there paul, but when kirk is on you, waiting for the pull up, you dont need to be a man and try a weak ass jump shot over him. you need to BE a man and drive on him, forcing a help defender your way. play the game like you always have and understand the game like you always have. there is no one on the court better at every aspect of the game, in any game. get this W in boston and ill see you in the orlando series.

by MichaelJCraven on May 2, 2009 2:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Gasol, Deron, or Have Faith In Rondo?
Small
Celtics' vibe
Small
This Team is Complete Garbage
Small
Frustrations..
Small
Rondo and back to backs
Small
Steve Kerr on Rondo's jump shot: "It gets frustrating for the Celtics"
Small
Debunking The "Build around Rondo" Myth
Small
What's up with Phoenix? Is a trade brewing?
Small
Look to Denver
Small
my turn on rondo..

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi