On D12, Perk, Skippy Clutch and the Rest of Game 6
A Daily Babble Production
The first half of Game 6 of Celtics-Magic made me think there was a shot at having a three-day weekend to rest before making a visit to Cleveland on Monday night. The second half proved analogous to watching a train wreck happen in slow motion. We covered the Celtics' disastrously poor ball movement yesterday. On we go to the rest of the ups and downs of Thursday's 83-75 loss:
- Much as it kills me to say this, Rafer Alston came up big down the stretch. He picked off Paul pierce's forced pass to Rajon Rondo at the left elbow and then drained an open three at the other end to finish the play and put the Magic up two with four minutes left. I'm happy to let him take big shots and fairly confident he won't make them most of the time, but he knocked down that one and then a runner in the lane to extend the lead to three in the final two minutes. Well done.
- My proclamations of J.J. Redick snapping out of his shooting slump have been about as spot-on as my continued predictions of the Ray Allen blow-up game (which I still believe is coming). Mark the former Duke star down for 3-for-25 over the last four games after an 0-for-7 showing in Game 6. He even missed a free throw, his first brick of the postseason, after knocking down 81 of 93 regular season attempts. Yeesh.
- While I wasn't thrilled with Rajon Rondo's second half (as noted yesterday), he did a fine job of attacking the basket early. He challenged the Magic bigs with several successful takes to the rim as well as a couple of nice dishes. The rebounding continues to leave me in awe. I've raised enough complaints of late with Raj's decision-making and defensive issues (and I stand by those), and given how much this guy has achieved over the course of the postseason, I'm happy to give him a break today.
- For the first two and a half quarters of this game, with the issue of boxing out excepted (more on that later), I could hardly have been happier with Kendrick Perkins. He looked poised offensively, knocking down multiple jumpers outside the paint and banking in a one-hander from the left side. In perhaps his neatest play of the night, he caught the ball on the left side underneath the bucket, ball-faked to get Dwight Howard in the air, went under the basket to use the rim as a shield and finished with the right hand while drawing the foul. He snared 10 rebounds, blocked three shots and looked like the best Celtic on the floor while staying out of foul trouble for much of the night. It's too bad he began piling up the fouls and turnovers in the fourth quarter.
- Dwight Howard played an excellent game and deserves plenty of credit for the Orlando victory. But let's be clear on something: This performance did not validate Howard's potshots at Stan Van Gundy in the media this week or his reference to himself as a dominant post player at the offensive end. Howard performed because he focused on doing the things he does well on the offensive end: clearing space to make deep catches, finishing lobs and crashing the glass to create garbage buckets off second chances. Aided by the fact that no Celtic seemed interested in even trying to get a body on him underneath, Howard collected 10 offensive rebounds, which directly resulted in four of his nine made field goals as well as eight of his 12 field-goal attempts for the night. He created more touches for himself by playing with renewed off-the-ball aggressiveness, and the result was an excellent 23-point, 22-rebound showing. But Howard finished 9-for-16 from the field because when Kendrick Perkins did force him to take shots away from the rim, he had trouble finishing once more, hitting just one lefty hook. He missed seven of those 12 attempts from the stripe as well. None of this is meant to contradict praise of D12's Game 6: He played to his strengths and caused the Celtics all sorts of trouble. But given the media firestorm about his offensive game this week, it seems worth clarifying that the numbers alone don't justify his assessment.
- Howard is currently posting a 26.8 rebound percentage for these playoffs. More than one out of every four misses when he is on the floor ends up in his hands. That's insane.
- Two impressive defensive plays from the bench: Eddie House made a sweet seal early in the fourth, and Brian Scalabrine got up just enough to block Rashard Lewis' jumper on the way up in the last three minutes of a one-point game.
- Thinking of House and Scal reminds me that I'm awfully curious to find out where this Celtics squad ranks on the vaunted list of "most foot-on-the-line-two-pointers made in a postseason."
- Hedo Turkoglu actually managed to look worse than his 3-for-13 shooting performance indicated for most of the night. He couldn't seem to find any consistency in his release, and the shots missed badly in every possible direction. Until he drained the dagger trey to extend the Orlando lead from three to six with 83 seconds left, that is. Shooters keep shooting.
- Shooters keep shooting. Ray Allen will start making.
- Bad foul trouble game for the Terrifying Toddler, who played just three and a half minutes while picking up three fouls in the first half and played most of the third quarter with four fouls. He also made one horrific defensive play: After Ray Allen had the ball stripped, and the Magic broke the other way in transition, Glen Davis sat in the middle of the paint completely oblivious to Courtney Lee cutting straight to the basket behind him. The Baby didn't even recover quickly enough to commit a foul, and only Eddie House sprinting back into the play to send Lee to the line prevented a lay-up. There's no excuse for not knowing someone is behind you headed to the rim in that situation defensively.
- Mickael Pietrus is quietly having himself a nice series.
- Loved the Celtics' first basket of this game: Ray passed up a shot to dump the ball off to an open Perk outside the right block. Perk drew a defender and made a fine pass to an open Newborn in the paint for a lay-in.
- Paul Pierce made a couple of great moves to the basket early, and his six-points-on-three-shots sequence provided a rare thrill in the fourth quarter. Rough night for him otherwise, including two late missed free throws after getting shook up on the preceding take to the rim. That said, his 5-for-8 off day at the line dropped him all the way to 40-for-46 (87 percent) for the series. Miserly indeed.
- Four fewer offensive rebounds, 12 more turnovers: It's no shock that the Celtics saw the Magic take five more shots from the field and get 18 more opportunities at the foul line. It's hard to win games when a team uses its possessions so poorly and allows the opponent to extend its own chances with the ball.
We're back at this earlier-than-normal Babble time tomorrow (best wishes to our fearless leader Jeff Clark for a great vacation as Green17, Roy and I try not to burn the house down while he is gone) with 10 truths about the Magic heading into Game 7.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Howard was an animal
Dwight Howard was an animal in Game 6 and deserves all the kudos he is being given but I think before everyone genuflects on the alter to Howard’s greatness in rebounding something should be mention. He was the recipient the other night of the NBA’s version of home court advantage, namely, referees looking the other way when it comes to David Stern’s list of marketable superstars.
Howard committed several, possibly as much as 5 fouls, while going over the back of Celtics or simply running them over. One play in particular that occurred in the fourth quarter that bothered me was a shot that went up and Howard was on the outside left of the lane. He ran into the lane and simply smashed into Pierce’s back , who had established rebounding position, sending him flying 3 feet out of bounds. Howard went on to get the rebound and got called for a foul against him in doing so. This is just one example and I remember at least three other times mentioning during the game that Howard was fouling underneath while getting his rebounds.
Now, I can’t blame Howard, he was a monster and did what he had to do to get rebounds and force his presence upon the game. It’s not his fault if the officials are going to allow him to do that. All I ask is for it to go both ways and for the refs not to call it less physically in other areas.
Don’t get me wrong, the Celtics did not lose because of the officiating. Quite the contrary, the other day’s game was one of the better officiated games as a whole that the Celtics have seen in these playoffs. But when I see praise going to Howard for his rebounding I think the caveat needs to be given that, especially in the last game, the refs at times allow him to get away with murder underneath.
I haven’t spoken to much in the forums about the other night but I think our caps should be tipped to the perimeter defense of the Magic that has been outstanding fghting through screens and staying close enough to force hesitation and indecision upn the Celtics outside shooters. It’s fairly obvious that the Magic’s game plan is to force the Celtic’s outside shooters to not shoot and to drive into Howard’s defense or to give up the ball and make Rondo and Perk beat them. The doubling of Pierce off Rondo’s man in particular was troublesome. The Celtics need to take advantage of this by penetrating and dishing. They haven’t. Again, ball movement as you said yesterday, Steve, is the key in those situations.
by nickagneta on May 16, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Good point at the end, Nick.
Perkins has really elevated his offensive game. He can stick the 15-footer and he can score at will on Howard on the block.
That’s four starters who have to be respected offensively. I really hope a summer of hard work will produce a fifth.
by CoachBo on May 16, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Consistency and Turnovers.
The Celtics have shown flashes of brilliance: in Game 2 we shot 51% from the field and 45% from 3pt. We only had 10 turnovers. Perk was the only one in the front line that was in foul trouble. We moved the ball. We played great team defense (made our rotations, forced Orlando to take difficult shots) alongside some good shooting, giving all of our starters a positive plus/minus rating (Pierce 12, Baby +19, Perk +10, Ray +19, Rondo +25). We won this game easily (112-94) despite Orlando shooting well from the field. Our best was better than their best. The Celtics have also shown what a tired team can look like: Game 1 when we were down 20 points in the 3rd, Game 3 when we shoot 28% from 3pt and look flat from the get go, Game 6 with letting Dwight rip down 10 offensive boards and the Celts with 19 turnovers. Yes: 19 turnovers. Great athletes are consistent and great teams are consistent. We need to play with the same level of focus, intensity, and energy every night. I know that this team is tired, but they have to come out firing and aggressive to make this Orlando team throw in the towel nice and early.
In the CHI series, the Celts kept their TOs down to about 12/game– giving up the ball 19 times in Game 4 (which we loss) but only giving it up 11 times in the Game 6 triple overtime loss. The key there? Rondo had 0 TOs in 58 minutes of the 3OT game. In this series, Rondo has been giving the ball away as if he gets paid by the turnover: 7 in Game 1, 3 in Game 2, 3 in Game 4, 3 in Game 5, 5 in Game 6. In this series, he’s turned it over 22 times with 1 game left. In the CHI series? 15 times… but in SO MANY EXTRA MINUTES of play because of all of the OTs. If Rondo takes care of the ball, the rest of the team will, too. As we love the saying: Rondo goes, so go the Celts.
http://loscy.wordpress.com/
by jontookem on May 16, 2009 11:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And ball movement as Steve pointed out in the thread below. The basketball stopped moving entirely in the second half Thursday night and we ended up with 29 points to show for it.
by CoachBo on May 16, 2009 11:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I noticed Pierce laying a body on Howard a handful of times and he did just enough 2 or 3 times for the Celtics to get the board. The problem is, the Celtics only have one guy (Perk!) who can legitimately box out Howard. Big Baby sort of can but much like his post defense, lack of height and leap really kills him.
by Berkcelt on May 16, 2009 11:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
stick it to howard...literally
everytime a shot goes up someone needs to be boxing out howard. if this team is going to beat us tomorrow id rather see the rest of their team rebound than him. We know he cant score on his own that is more than obvious. We need to hit him where it hurts and thats on the glass. Bodies on Dwight when the shot goes up the rest of their team cant rebound theyre horrible. If we put a body on Dwight whose to say he doesnt put up an embarassing stat line of 10 points 10 rebounds.
by threats13 on May 16, 2009 5:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















