CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Trade Assets - Expiring Contracts

I'll give you one Jakie Moon and two guards for a former All Star.

More photos » by Phelan M. Ebenhack - AP

I'll give you one Jakie Moon and two guards for a former All Star.

Last night we looked at a long list of players we could pick up via free agency.  Today I wanted to follow that up with a look at the trade market.  For the sake of this discussion, I'm going to leave Ray Allen out of the mix.  My preference is to keep him so I'd like to explore our other options before going in that direction.  Besides, we have some other assets to look at first.

A lot has been made over the years about how much Brian Scalabrine was overpaid several years back.  (Note: I always felt like he got too many years, but his annual salary wasn't really all that bad)  Now his contract becomes one of our best assets since it is expiring at just the right time (in time for the 2010 free agent class).

Now I'm with the majority of you that loved what Scal brought to this team this year.  In an ideal world, we'd keep him on the roster for at least another year and let him be the kind of Posey-lite, great lockerroom guy that we've come to love.  However, I'm of the opinion that his contract is potentially more valuable to us in a trade.  Especially when you couple him with a couple of other guys that were largely non-factors this year.

Tony Allen is in the last year of his deal and JR Giddens only has one guaranteed year left (next year is a team option).  You can combine their salaries to get up to almost $7M then you can make a trade with another team for up to 25% +$100,000 more than that.

Brian Scalabrine 3,413,793
Tony Allen 2,500,000
JR Giddens 1,028,880
Total 6,942,673
+25% (+100k)
1,835,668
Target Salary 8,778,341


That means we can turn those three guys (only one of whom was effective last year) and turn them into a guy making over $8M or a few players making over $8M.  In fact, if you toss in Gabe Pruitt, the number jumps to $9.6M.  Or if you want to really go for the gold, you can replace Giddens with House (assuming he picks up his player option) and get that number up to over $11M (but it better be a really big upgrade since House is very much part of the rotation).

I'll let you start to look around the league for players and teams that could match up.  (The trade ideas forum is open 24/7)

Interestingly enough, even if we do a 3 for 1 or 4 for 1 deal we wouldn't have too much trouble filling out the roster.  Counting House we have 11 guys under contract for next year.  A 3 for 1 deal would put that number down to 9.  But in theory you could resign Powe and Baby, bring in a couple vet minimum guys and a rookie or two and make the roster minimum of 12.  And that doesn't even count the option to use the mid level exception (MLE).

Make no mistake, a lot of teams out there are going to be looking to shed salary.  Expiring contracts are valuable in a market like this.  On the other hand, a lot of other teams have similar expiring contracts and draft picks to sweeten the pot.  In fact, for the most part a single player making $8M in expiring dollars is more attractive than a package of 3 or 4 players because he only takes up a single roster spot.  But every situation is different and Danny might be able to find the right mix.

Keep your eyes and ears open leading up to the draft, since that seems to be a night where a lot of trades go down.

So toss some names out in the comments.  Who do you see that makes somewhere over $8M that you think we could pick up with expiring contracts?

0 recs  |  Comment 79 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'll start

we know that Ainge looked at the viability of trading for Nocioni last season

he makes $7.5M this year and his salary actually goes down over the next two years (with a team option on the 4th year)

he’d be a nice 6th man for us and he’d give Pierce a lot more rest

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 7:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

funny

how much grief i took for my push on nocioni last season leading up to the trade deadline — now he’s the flavor of the month.

speaking of last year’s trade ideas, i’m all for offering hakim warrick something cheap to a) see if he’ll sign in a down market and b) testing heisley’s desire (or lack there of) to sign the guy. i bet his d would improve on this team and he could be a nice 3, 4 combo guy off the bench.

by ssspence on May 29, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, what were we giving up?

There’s a difference between trading expiring contracts for him, versus giving up BBD or Powe last season.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree

also, I was puzzled last year why they would trade for Nocioni with his contract but not give Posey an extra year on his free agent offer the summer before

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, yeah. We now know that Grousbeck was willing to pay the freight for Posey and Ainge wasn’t, so the question continues to linger, tinted by questions about accurate basketball decisions.

by CoachBo on May 29, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

I think the reason is simple. They weren’t adding salary, at least not a lot. We would have moved some of our contracts.. To sign Posey would have required a $26M payout that equated to 52M with the tax included.

by badax33 on May 29, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

here's the post --

http://www.celticsblog.com/2008/12/31/705972/limited-trade-options

the Nocioni trade idea was:

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2367~138~3019~1021~2456&teams=4~4~4~4~2&te=&cash=

it would have essentially have been the same when danny pushed for it from SAC — a pure salary dump. my Salmons deal perhaps wasn’t realistic but would have been pretty happy there too. but i’m glad the warrick deal didn’t happen(!) though i’m in favor of signing both warrick and ross, the latter if we can’t get a grant hill type and / or if we trade a couple of wings like TA and Giddens.

Jeff, you liked ’em back then!

http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/1/1/706756/a-few-good-ideas

by ssspence on May 29, 2009 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It seems like people were fairly supportive of your idea...

Although in my opinion, it makes much more sense for Sacramento than it did for Chicago.

Anyway, Nocioni for Tony + Scal + Giddens makes all the sense in the world for us. Let’s hope that’s the best offer Sacramento gets.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

chicago

at the time they had thebo and deng hadn’t gone down with injury. it was also unclear that they would become a competitive team after adding salmons and marky mark miller. so the salary dump made more sense back then for them.

but i hear you — SAC may be anxious to shed salary considering the Maloofs serious problems.

by ssspence on May 29, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trade rules...

You can actually add 25% + $100k to deals, and still have them work under trade rules. That means we could trade those three players, and bring back up to $8,778,341.25 in salary.

Nocioni is the guy I want, too, at least the guy I want who is on the trade market. Unfortunately, Marcus Camby seems to be just out of our price range, even if we added Pruitt.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 8:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

shoot

I knew I’d do the math wrong

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

numbers fixed - I think

if you see something still off, feel free to edit me, thanks Roy

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 8:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Looks good, Jeff

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 8:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

camby is expiring anyway?

thus making the desirability of our junk nil —

by ssspence on May 29, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Clips can still save quite a bit of money by moving him...

Trading him for expiring contracts totaling around $7.5 million would save them $2.5 million. I agree, though, that they’d probably want a legit asset along with the expirings.

Oh, and I did the math wrong. We could trade for Camby if we added Pruitt.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and

the c’s could add in cash so the clips could buyout TA and Scal (I don’t think DA and Wyc are worried about one year outlays, just longer term commitment.) the clips still only do this if camby can’t be turned into something better. i think they are stuck with randolph no matter what, and i think they’d be making a mistake to give up on Kaman now, who could be a nice front court compliment to their #1.

too bad they paid all that money to davis.

by Brendan on May 29, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cosign on Nocioni. I think he’s a perfect younger fit for the Posey role.

by CoachBo on May 29, 2009 8:08 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Possible Players

I put together a little list of players that fit this particular criteria.

1-Ron Artest-I know this would have to be more of a sign and trade type thing and highley unlikely but Ron Would be perfect for this team he only made 7.4Mill

2-Stephen Jackson- Another guy that would be a great fit with his toughness and offensive ability he only makes 7.1 million (Would GS be crazy enough to dump him to the Celts?)Probably not

3-Shane Battier doubt Houston trades him but he makes 6.4 million

4-Nocioni popular with C fans and a possibility at 8Mill

5-Barbosa if phoenix is looking to disperse which it might he makes 6.1Mill

6-Raja Bell who I like and I know Danny tried to get at the trading deadline and Larry Brown does have an itchy trigger finger he only makes 5Mill

7-John Salmons proved to be a great pick up for the bulls I dont think they deal him but he makes 6mill

8-Przybilla nice back up big man but we can probably get someone cheaper in the free agent market he makes 6mill

9-Marquis Daniels 6.8 mill

10-Jamal Crawford now he most likely will be moved he makes about 8.5 mill I believe
 

by Petro03 on May 29, 2009 8:15 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

once again, I forgot about sign-and-trade options

see how complex this is?

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even sign-and-trades can get tricky...

Due to “base year compensation” rules. More on that when my free agency FAQ comes out. ;-)

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

looking forward to it

as usual

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

also

I don’t see Houston giving up Battier but I’d love to get him
I don’t see Portland letting Przybilla go for that little either

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Barbosa

Only if Ray is traded or part of a Ray trade. He, Ray and Eddie is getting a little redundent.

by ssspence on May 29, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Barbosa

I actually disagree I think Barbosa is a better ball handler than both Allen and House he CAN play the back up pg role plus with his speed and overall game he is better than House and he can play both pg and sg positions better than house can.He’s not my number one choice for a trade either but he would be worth considering

by Petro03 on May 29, 2009 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

Barbosa has been aweful as a PG. he’s a 2 gaurd thru and thru

by ssspence on May 29, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

dont want any part of barbosa

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on May 30, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

suns-chicago trade rumor

rumor is shaq to the bulls for deng. if this trade happens no way do they move salmons. shaq makes $20m and deng $10 so other players will need to be added such as tim thomas $6m or hinrich $10m. im sure the suns would need to give up a pick or two also. hinrich makes alot of sense because there were rumblings that they may trade nash or decline his option to free up money.

here’s the link: http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2009/5/27/890909/rumor-shaq-to-chicago-for-luol-deng

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on May 30, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Battier/Przybilla

Yeah i agree with you Jeff as far as shane is concerened love to have him in green but I think the C’s will look for a back up big man in the open market alla Mcdyess/Birdman-which I felt they should have given a chance last year

by Petro03 on May 29, 2009 8:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

None of above

Thanks for explaining the expiring contract details. That is complicated stuff.

I think it is foolish to put $8.0 mil into one bench player. I’ve been reading so many opinions here that Big Baby – a damned good bench player – isn’t worth $5.0 mil, isn’t worth $4.0 mil, “wouldn’t give him more than $10 mil for 3 yrs”, blah, blah, blah. Now this blog sugests shooting the wad on one Nocioni caliber player. When what we need is help at the 5.

Nocioni is no $8 mil player and only a fool would take on someone else’s contract mistake. Some of my fellow bloggers must be from Iceland – which couldn’t distinguish real money from fantasy money either .

I’m not a Robert Swift guy. “Failed to launch” comes to mind. Was at the Portland game this year and he’s goofy looking guy (apologies to his mother), but pretty big. But, we are looking for 3rd string center (and hoping for better) and in Danny I trust.

by Wildblu1 on May 29, 2009 8:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nocioni’s skillset is FAR more complete than Glen Davis.

by CoachBo on May 29, 2009 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

And assuming we can get a decent big man like McDyess (or Rasheed, or Zaza, or whoever) in here, BBD’s skill set will be a bit redundant. Keep in mind that coming off the bench, he was averaging around 5 to 7 points, and 3 to 4 rebounds. That’s the role he’ll be in next season.

I’d rather have a guy like Nocioni who can play the 3/4. If there’s no budget, I’d love to see both here (plus someone use the MLE), but I don’t want to overspend on an overweight, short power forward who, by his own admission, is all about the money.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big Baby at $4.0 mil (plus Scal) or Nocioni at $8.0 mil?

I’d still take the “Devil you know” route. As for BBD’s all-about-the-money, it looks to me like Nocioni’s agent squeezed every last buck out of him.

As for Coach Bo’s comment, Nocioni is quite a bit older than BBD and we have both next year and the years beyond to think about. I do not think that BBD has topped out as a player, skill wise. I do think BBD is better defender than Leon and his shot developed well. Nothing wrong with Nocioni. Nice player. Just ridiculous to think he’s worth $8.0 mil.

by Wildblu1 on May 29, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's owed $21 million over 3 years...

So, $7 million per season. I do think that’s a better investment than, say, BBD at $15 million over 3 years.

I’d like to see BBD come back, and there’s no reason we couldn’t make this trade and also keep him here. However, if my options were Nocioni + MLE, or BBD + Scal + Tony, I’d take option one every time.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

5

Your right we do need a “5” but we need a wing player more badley looking at Pierce run out of gas in the playoffs we need somebody like a “Pietrus/Posey Type” to help us. We can find a back up center for a reasonable price but a good wing player will cost us more. Please no more Swift talks the guy stinks

by Petro03 on May 29, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If there was any way

of Trading for Shane Battier I’d do it

This guy is EXACTLY what we need. He can fill the wing position, give Pierce serious minutes, defend the opponents best scorer, and he’s a phenomenal teammate

I guess for all these reasons, Houston is highly unlikely to trade him

by OutofServicePervis on May 29, 2009 8:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ah, wow.

I loved Battier’s performance against Kobe in the HOU-LAL series. His defense would easily make us best defensive team in the East.

"I was playing in the streets one time and my friend broke off a leg to a chair and threw it at another guy through his heart and he died." - Ron Artest, QB's finest

by endverse on Jun 1, 2009 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

nocioni is not worth 8 mil. scal is more valuable at 3. barbosa is worth it.

by nazzbo on May 29, 2009 9:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather have Nocioni

He’s a better defender, and has a better attitude.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also...

We need a 3/4 more than we do another undersized combo guard.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

c’s need some frontcourt depth and a 3 who allows the c’s to go small when its necessary, I love barbosa but he just duplicates what eddie house brings to the table

by lowfatalbob on May 29, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m driving the Barbosa bandwagon… I would love Nocioni but his contract is a bit out of whack and would strap the Cs. As I’ve said a number of times, can you imagine the pressure the Cs would put on a defense with Rondo/Barbosa for 48 minutes alone and together for spells? Ray Allen and Eddie House become all the more dangerous. Add a Grant Hill or Rasheed Wallace and the Cs are potent offensively off the bench. In fact, I think the following is a real possibility for next year…

Rondo/Barbosa
Allen/House/Giddens
Pierce/Hill/Walker
Garnett/Scalabrine (after buyout by PHX)/Powe (after midseason)
Perkins

With either Baby or Gortat (I’d prefer Gortat), and a LLE-type big man to complement either BBD or GOrtat (i.e. PF w/ LLE if the Cs are able to land Gortat or a C w/ the LLE if the Cs go with BBD)

by vwoodruff on May 29, 2009 9:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Of course, if the Cs ownership wants to pay the MLE in addition to BBD, I wouldn’t be opposed to giving McDyess a portion ;)

by vwoodruff on May 29, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Barbosa isn't much of a PG...

His 3.4 assists per 36 minutes is atrocious.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on May 29, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

as i did above. he is a 2 and always will be.

by ssspence on May 29, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

On the current Cs team, his PG skills would be adequate… ROndo will demand more minutes as he continues his progression. Barbosa is an adequate ballhandler and his tempo is key. He attacks…. As long as the Cs use good ball movement Barbosa’s APG stats don’t really matter. He is depended upon as a scorer off the bench for PHX… would we not like that skill set backing up Rondo?

by vwoodruff on May 29, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can the team afford to acquire a contract like Nocioni and spend the MLE at the same time?

I don’t mean next season, because he’d just be replacing those expiring deals, but can they afford it in 2010 and beyond?

In 2010 — KG and Pierce add up to about $40mil. Let’s say Ray and Rondo sign for $10mil apiece, that’s $60mil. Then you have Perk and the MLE, another $10mil, up to $70mil now. Then add $7-8mil from trading those expiring contracts, and you’re up around $77mil for seven players. Then you still have to fill out the rest of the squad ($4-7mil). That might be manageable …. looks a tight squeeze though.

If they’re willing to pay it, then great, make the trade. If not, I think the C’s will be able to get a better player with their MLE than through a trade, so I’d pick the MLE.

by Who on May 29, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who

You make a good point and I think most people who post on this site fail to realize. If we trade our expiring contracts and use the MLE to give someone a 3 year contract then we are adding salary in the follwoing years. It’s probably the reason that we didn’t sign Posey last year. I would think that Danny and Wyc have a ball park figure for our max salary for this year and the next 3,4 or 65years. Remember this is a business for them and a fantasy league for us fans, including myself..

by badax33 on May 29, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of all the players discussed

so far, the only ones who their present teams would have any interest in trading are Nocioni, Barbosa, Daniels and Crawford—all the others are important players who wouldn’t be dumped for a pile of trash. Of those four, Daniels is in his last year in 2009-10 and therefore isn’t salary-dump bait. Crawford is overpaid, and doesn’t play a position of need. The Cs are unlikely to devote major assets to backup PG, which is only third or fourth on their shopping list.

That leaves Nocioni as the only sensible salary-dump candidate listed so far.

Ray Allen isn’t getting $10 million per in his next contract.

"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark

by Eeyore III on May 29, 2009 9:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Jeff Foster

He makes around 5.5M and would fill the backup center and PF slot and has 2 years left on his contract. I can’t see Larry letting him go, but … . Foster is a rebounding fool, and kills teams on the offensive glass. He’s also pretty tough and physical.

Also, I do like the Nocione deal. Not only is he skilled but plays with a chip on his shoulder. He doesn’t mind hitting somebody in the mouth or using his body as a battering ram.

by badax33 on May 29, 2009 10:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

well

Ray very well might take 10 per on a four year deal – since the last year makes it up. He’d also be the ideal SG next to Lebron – if NYK can sign to elite guys those would be the guys I went for.

Anyways – if the C’s can afford the cash in one year, and just worry about down the line commitments, Scal and Tony can be traded with money to buy them out. Scal and Tony would both likely get picked up for the minimum at ~1.5 million per year so Tony probably only costs 1-1.5 million. Scal’s making 3 so maybe he costs 2-2.5 (maybe less if he knows the C’s would pick him up and he wanted to come back.) The C’s can send 3 million in any deal – so a team that traded with the Celts could save 6 million on top of whatever they cut. So a trade of the three guys Jeff mentions for a 8.7 million dollar player could save 6-7 million after buyouts. If the team is over the tax limit then it actually saves them a bit more (but not double since they still pay tax on the buyouts.)

I can’t see a team acquiring both Tony Allen and JR Giddens. At this point JR is a bit of an unknown and maybe some team takes a gamble on him developing or maybe some team has the minutes to play Tony Allen and try to rejuvenate good Tony, but I doubt a team wants both. Pruitt’s got the buyout built in, so he’s a good way to inflate salary and I could see even Walker getting thrown into the deal if a higher paid guy that’s worth while is out of reach. Also a third team could be included to make the salaries work.

Teams won’t dump a player for bad players that make the same amount, but they absolutely will trade a player just to get out from the money. The buyout option means Scal and Tony can likely be bought out and its more like the team released the player for nothing, rather than different for bad contracts.

by Brendan on May 29, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Other Opitons

Here are some other options

Keyon Dooling 3 yrs 3.8M
Eduardo Najera 3 yrs 3.0
Ronny Turiaf 3yrs 4.0M
Dan Gaduric 2 yrs 7.0
James Posey 3 yts 6.5
Mo Peterson 2 yrs 6.5
Nic Collison 2 yrs 6.5
Andra Blatche 3 yrts 3.2

by badax33 on May 29, 2009 10:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No to Nocioni

While I think he is a good player, I dont think he fits the C’s need. I think the C’s need to get more athletic on the wings. Athleticism is not one of Nocioni’s strengths. As mentioned above, I would also love to get Warrick. Probably not going to happen however. Does Marion get more than the Mid Level? I think Matt Barnes would be a good fit. Also, I think Richard Jefferson would be terrific in green but he makes 12 milion for the next 2 years. Too bad b/c he would be perfect off the bench and could be had for next to nothing.

by njnick on May 29, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Diaw

How about Boris Diaw? I thinks hes making 9 Mil we would have to include Gabe. But I’m all for it

by Gemini36 on May 29, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Jeff Foster

I like Foster a lot. He always plays great against the C’s. Is Nocioni that great a defensive player? I know he hustles and all. Wouldn’t we rather have Trevor Ariza? I might like Nocioni better in a bigger deal including Kevin Martin. Not sure…..

by celty86 on May 29, 2009 11:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Foster is pacers for life

Don’t think he is getting traded…

by Celtics3 on May 29, 2009 12:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Posey is available

Hornet’s off-season will be interesting… I would love to have posey back… 6 mill for 3 more!

by Celtics3 on May 29, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

well

Ainge has been known to do stuff like that before – see Walker, Antoine

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Before getting rid of J.R. Giddens...

Wouldn`t it make sense to see if he has potential first?
Perhaps he could develop into a good player for us, and is worth keeping.

Typical of Rivers, he got to play only 8 minutes last year…what kind of opportunity is that?!?

We can even ignore the fact that he made 2 of his only 3 shot attempts from the field.

by Title 18 on May 29, 2009 12:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Collison would be a nice pickup also. But I’m not sure Ainge is gonna put a lot of money towards one bench player (i.e. Nocioni). Hopefully he spends more wisely than last summer.

by celty86 on May 29, 2009 12:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Lucky17

Scal, Tony, Giddens, and Pruitt for Earl Watson and Damien Wilkins.

by Lucky17 on May 29, 2009 1:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't sleep on the Mavs

I could see Cuban getting ready for the 2010 splash. Josh Howard, I’m looking in your direction

by whambulance on May 29, 2009 2:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

For those looking for a shooting guard who can defend...

It’s Gabe Pruitt, though Doc seems not to agree. What’s up? Don’t know. I followed Pruitt locally through college ball. He’s reserved, yes. Not to worry. He shows up on court when provided consistent opportunities. I know Pruitt to be a pressure player (Reminds me of Sam and K.C. Jones). I believe Pruitt would make a great compliment to Rondo. All he requires is consistent opportunities. May next year be the year. Give the kid a chance, finally.

by socal celt on May 29, 2009 2:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

unfortunately

his only opportunity is at Point Gaurd

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on May 29, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stephen Jackson

His contract is a little scary but I’d take him over Barbosa or Nocioni. He’s an all around better fit for what the C’s need. Super aggressive, monster on D, can hit the 3 and run the point if need be. Seeing Perk, Garnett, Pierce, Jackson and Rondo on the floor all at once is enough to give any team nightmares. Just talking about it makes me a little spooked….

by whambulance on May 29, 2009 2:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It depends which club wants to get rid of salary

Hinrich is the best choice if Chicago wants to get rid of salary. He would be able to guard the smaller 2s like he did with Ray Allen and all but the quickest ones. It would take salaries of Scales, T. Allen, Giddens and Pruitt and maybe you could even get a future 1 out of chicago if you throw in the max 3M.

by oldmanspeaks on May 29, 2009 6:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

bulls won't deal hinrich to boston

chicago wouldn’t deal one of its rotation players to its fledgling rivals, I see minnesota trading the expring contract of brian cardnal and one of its many young guys plus a 1st rounder for hinrich

by lowfatalbob on May 29, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

would be a good pickup for the wolves if that happens.

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on May 30, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eddie, please pick up your option...

because that would add about 2.65 million to our expiring contracts, + 25% + 100K, and throw in Walker and Pruitt, and we can get close to 14 million of expiring money. (Kaman? Jason Richardson?)

by Fan from VT on May 29, 2009 7:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nocioni is NOT the answer

God, how I love coming to celticsblog to hear uninformed hyperbole.

Listen, I love Nocioni for one reason: he’s a badass. He plays hard and brings toughness and tenacity to the court. I LOVE that. The problem is, he’s too slow to guard most 3s and too small to guard 4s. Sure, he’ll try hard, but he doesn’t have the physical ability to consistently compete. Like a lot of guys, he only becomes valuable if he’s hitting his 3s. He’s a career 37 percent 3 point shooter, so while that sounds good…

We don’t have an offensive problem on this team! We need defenders, we need guys who are long and can defend the 3/4 from an athletic standpoint, guarding guys from Lebron to Rashard Lewis. Nocioni is NOT that guy by a mile. I’d rather we put all our eggs in the basket of the guy that can actually defend the 3/4 instead of putting them in the basket of the guy who needs to hit 3 pointers to justify his playing time at the 3/4.

Trevor Ariza makes a TON more sense for the Cs than Nocioni ever will (though I do realize that their situations are different, but I’m just throwing his name out there as the type of 3/4 that we ACTUALLY need).

Put me in the camp that think we should be figuring on House’s expiring contract when we construct these hypothetical trades. I’d trade him in a heartbeat—and since he actually has value around the league, we might actually get some takers. Scal/TA/Giddens have almost zero value around the league, which means we’re only going to be able to trade them for underperforming overpaid players with multiple years left on their bloated contracts. Put in House and there’s a little value and maybe we get a better deal…

In all actuality, I expect that Scal/TA/Giddens won’t be dealt until next season’s trade deadline, if at all. There might be more value to us in simply getting their deals off the books.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on May 30, 2009 11:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

good points salmon

and a couple of guys who may or may not fit the criteria are Hakim Warrick, Marvin Williams and Travis Outlaw. Danny won’t add bloated contracts onto his payroll. Didn’t do it last year with Posey, won’t add any this summer either. So Scal and TA are probably here until late Feb anyways. I do hope he gives Giddens a real chance to show something before he’s cut. He looks like he ought to be able to guard people.

by celty86 on May 30, 2009 1:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

3 more points

1. Warrick, Williams, and Outlaw are EXACTLY the type of players we should be looking at, but I doubt if they’re available for what we have. Bargain basement guys like Jamario Moon might be more realistic though. Or possibly throwing the full MLE at a guy like Ariza, if only to make the Lakers pay (they face a tough choice this summer between Ariza and Odom—they can’t afford both, especially if one is getting the full MLE for 5 years).
2. Danny Ainge almost never gives away an asset. As much as they have been maligned, TA/Scal/Giddens are all assets. TA would be a good starter if Ray/Paul were out for an extended period of time, and he might be decent bench player if he’s teamed with a competent point guard. Scal is a good band-aid from time to time, especially when he’s making his shot. And Giddens has definite NBA-talent, especially on the defensive end (he’s a GREAT rebounder as well), though his attitude seems to rub everyone the wrong way. If Danny can find a fair deal for any of these 3, he probably does it. If not, he’s going to keep them around just in case…that’s the way he operates.
3. We have, what, like 28 million in expiring contracts? With Rondo’s extension coming up, Ray’s possible extension, and new contracts for Baby and Free Agent Player X and/or Y, it’s probably smarter to let TA/Scal/House/Giddens (possibly) walk then trade them for non-expiring contracts. The money that comes off the books just gets diverted to the new contracts for Rondo/Baby/Ray (at perhaps 8-10 million per)/Free Agent Player X and/or Y. There’s no need to pick up some other team’s bloated contract…

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on May 30, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i hope ray re-signs cheap!

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on May 30, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Marvin Williams. Good all-round small forward with good versatility.

I do not like Warrick or Outlaw. Not enough defense.

by Who on May 30, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sergio rodriguez!!!

thats who i want! portlands willing to trade him at least they were last year. he only makes $1.8m this year. id be willing to give them tony allen and a future draft pick for him.

they have to resign outlaw, blake, aldridge and roy over the ext two years and have 3 PG’s with bayless likely the top guy.

i would feel alot better off with him at the backup point spot than pruitt , marbury, etc…

another guy id like but dont know if they’d trade him is azubuike from golden state. he makes $3.1m this year. pruitt and scal, 2nd rounder maybe?

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on May 30, 2009 2:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who

do we / you really know that Outlaw or Warrick don’t play enough D? Have they been in a system like Tom T’s and next to a guy like KG? They have excellent length and might flourish in our system.

by celty86 on May 30, 2009 11:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

good point

ray allen was never anything close to a good defender anywhere’s else. not that he’s good now but he’s adequate

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on May 31, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Miami-dolphins_small
Bye bye Big 3
Small
Should Ainge seek to make a trade to improve the team?
Small
Donny Better Than 'Doc'
Small
Can anyone explain this?
Small
Aging
Small
coaches are pathetic
Small
Doc, Start Doing Your Job!
Images_small
STOP HATING ON CELTICS
Shelden_small
WARNING! Spoiler alert!
Small
Brilliant Marketing

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small indeedproceed

300h_small Wide Load

Authors

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Small tenaciousT

Big_4_small jimmyt

Celtics_shirt_small Greg Payne