Team Needs: Center/Big Man
Our team needs are no big mystery. Doc himself laid them out in detail. We need veterans, and we need depth at center, small forward, and point guard. As we roll along, it seems like a good time to review these team needs, starting with backup center.
I couldn't be happier with the progress Kendrick Perkins has made each and every year. He's an established veteran center who plays fantastic defense and pulls down his share of rebounds. He's the perfect compliment to Kevin Garnett and a wonderful fit in the Doc/Thibs system. He's even developed a respectable offensive game. However, he's just one man. And he's occasionally foul prone and has a shoulder issue that is bound to plague him on and off his whole career.
All too often this year Doc had to lean heavily on Big Baby and Leon Powe at center, but both are undersized for the 4 spot, never mind the 5 and now both are free agents.
Patrick O'Bryant was the low risk, high upside gamble of the offseason. The thinking was that if KG couldn't motivate him, nobody could. Turns out nobody could. Enter mid season pickup Mikki Moore, who was supposed to be the anti-O'Bryant (all effort, little talent). That never worked out either. Toss in the oft-injured Scot Pollard from a year ago and we've seen too many big man experiments gone wrong.
We either need another PJ Brown (someone older but reliable) or a taller version of Leon Powe (hard worker, smart player, knows his role). I'm all for taking a flyer on a big man with upside, but not at the expense of getting one of the above.
As a minimum, the guy would have to be able to learn our defensive schemes. It would be great if the guy could rebound and not get in the way on offense. If he's got a good offensive game, that's a bonus I can live with too.
So who can we get? Lets look at some options:
Free Agents: (see my list of potential free agents for reference)
Marcin Gortat - He's big, he's fairly skilled, and he's played very well in support of Dwight Howard for the Magic. He's also the most likely big man to be overpaid this offseason. The Knicks already have their eye on him and seem ready to throw the MLE at him.
Antonio McDyess - If he signed, he would fill the PJ Brown role nicely. In fact, he's still a very effective big man in this league and he would fit in perfectly. He's even friends with Kevin Garnett. Probably my top choice right now and I would imagine his price tag wouldn't be too high. He was very loyal to the Pistons but they are clearly moving in different directions and I imagine Antonio will be open to offers from contenders like the Celts.
Chris Anderson - The Birdman got a look from the Celtics last year and I imagine he would have worked out a lot better than O'Bryant if given the opportunity. Instead he landed in Denver and made a big impression on everyone with his energetic style. Now he's a free agent again. Will Danny be more agressive this time or has that ship sailed?
Rasheed Wallace - I've made my feelings clear on this, but not everyone agrees. He's a big name option and Danny has reportedly shown interest in him as early as last February. A lot might depend on his price tag and motivation.
Radoslav Nesterovic - A true (lumbering) center if ever there was one. He's got touch and can score and pass but he's limited on the boards and defense. Worth a look but I'm not sure if the fit is ideal.
Others: Zaza Pachulia, Robert Swift, Shelden Williams, Francisco Elson, Joe Smith, Chris Wilcox, Drew Gooden
Potential Trade Targets:
It is much harder narrowing down the list of trade ideas, but here are a few names to toss in a hat. An ideal pickup would be Brook Lopez from New Jersey but that's not happening. I get the feeling that Tyrus Thomas could be had, but I don't know if we have what it takes to pry him away. Diop seems like a poor man's Perk; if the Cats want to shed salary, he might be an option. I've been trying to figure out ways to pry Jeff Foster away from the Pacers for a while and nothing has come to me. Same with Nick Collison of the Thunder. I don't think we have what it takes to pick up Joel Przbilla but I think Channing Frye could be had. I'm sure I'm missing more than a few names but feel free to add them in the comments.
Mid Season Pickups (Buyout Candidates):
If all else fails, there's always the same routine we've seen the last couple of years. Wait till after the trade deadline and see who shakes out of the system. Right now I wouldn't be too surprised to see the Clippers save some money on Marcus Camby's contract. I could see the Grizzlies cutting Darko Milicic loose as well.
The Draft:
Doc has stated that he wants vets, and I'm all for that as the first option. However, once we fill that slot, I'm all for taking a big somewhere in the draft. Danny would likely have to purchase a pick somewhere in the late first or early second round to get anyone of impact. I havn't got a clue who that would be, but feel free to research at Draft Express or NBADraft.net.
And hey, there's always Antoine Walker! [ducking for cover]
0 recs |
107 comments
|
Comments
Two other names...
Chris Wilcox and Joe Smith.
I personally like McDyess as a free agent. He’s tough, he’s skilled, he can shoot, he can rebound, and he should be available for less than the MLE. I’d look at most of the guys on the list, though.
Jeff Foster would be perfect, and if Indiana looks to move him, we have to at least throw out some expiring contracts.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 10, 2009 8:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and Gooden, too...
He’s not my cup of team, but some people seem to like him. He wouldn’t be much of a backup 5, though.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 10, 2009 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup
those are 3 good names that I missed, though Joe Smith was kind of a disappointment to the Cavs (after all that drama) wasn’t he?
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 10, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also think ty chandler should be added to the list.
scal, tony, eddie house and giddens and some cash for chandler and the 21st pick. pre-agreement that house will be cut and the Cs sign him back after 30 days.
by ssspence on Jun 10, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going to reply that that is unrealistic
but then I looked at the deal they completed at the deadline last year (that was rescinded): “Joe Smith, Chris Wilcox and the rights to DeVon Hardin”
now, there’s a difference between getting out of his salary last year and getting out of it at the end of this year, but still – that’s a low value they place on him
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 10, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
talk about lopsided
I’d do that deal in a heartbeat—-so lopsided in the C’s favor it’s ridiculous.
C’s get a really good 4/5 player AND a 1st round draft pick AND Eddie back on a reduced contract and all we have to give up is TA, Veal and Giddens?
NO may be desperate to dump salary but that’s insanely unbalanced for the C’s.
by slamtheking on Jun 10, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
these are strange times -- deals like this are not out of the question
the deal saves shinn around $30mil, and he’s shown he’s willing to do it before.
by ssspence on Jun 10, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and byron scott 1) loves scal, and 2) has no shooting guards
by ssspence on Jun 10, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and he still won't
based on TA and Giddens contributions last year! :-)
by slamtheking on Jun 10, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. I think Dice should be the first choice.
by CoachBo on Jun 10, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FA most likely
The best options for filling the current hole is from the FA list rather than a trade. The top 2 candidates that would be great to get are Sheed and Mcdyess. If Danny can’t get one of those, Gortat, Anderson or Pachulia are decent fallbacks. No reason he shouldn’t be able to get one of those 5 players.
The players we’d want in a trade aren’t realistically obtainable with our disposable trade assets—→expiring contracts of bench players. I don’t see Foster or Brooks being moved for expiring deals.
The option of waiting on the waiver wire isn’t really an option. The C’s need that role filled from day 1, not 3/4 of the way through the season. Camby would be a nice pickup but we need him sooner rather than later and Danny can’t afford to play the waiver wire merry-go-round again this year when the good players end up going elsewhere and we’re picking up a Mikki “don’t come around here no” Moore level of player.
by slamtheking on Jun 10, 2009 8:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
waiver wire
I’m not a fan of it as a first option but a lot can happen between now and the deadline (injuries, trades, etc.)
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 10, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Waiver Wire
With our salary structure and status as championship contender, late season waiver wire pickups will continue to be important sources of cheap veteran talent.
Yes, it would be nice to have them from Day 1, but that’s not always realistic. You can expect at least 1 roster spot will be left open this season to see what drops from the sky after the trading deadline…
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Jun 10, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure
no problem leaving 1 spot open just in case someone useful drops into our laps but not to be used as the primary option for filling the obvious gaping holes we currently have with the bench.
by slamtheking on Jun 10, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is a defensible move, if...
the market is too rich. It’s all about getting value for dollars. Last summer was a seller’s market, and so deferring some necessities in the hopes of finding them on the market due to in-season buyouts was a prudent move. We almost got McDyess (after he was cut by the Nuggets he sent texts to several Cs telling them he was coming—so said Sean Grande); and we ended up getting Marbury, so it worked out somewhat.
This summer is a seller’s market so I think Danny will find it easier to fill his needs with reasonable contracts and thus won’t find it necessary to bet on some waiver wire signings to fill up his team. That is, we won’t go into the the season with 2 holes unfilled…maybe just one (small forward, on the hope that Bill Walker can grow into the role)…
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Jun 10, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say we take a flyer on a little "birdie".....
I wanted him last year, this year and next year. He is everything I want in a reserve big man.
http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/5/3/863784/in-hindsight-someone-we-couldve
by Dchuck on Jun 10, 2009 8:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm all about the Birdie as well...
I think he would be the perfect fit. I like McDyess too, but Birdman brings KG-like intensity on the defensive end.
by B-ball on Jun 10, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris Wilcox
I like him as a bench role player at the right price. Unrestricted free agent, I believe.
by Fred Roberts on Jun 10, 2009 8:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
For the right price, I would think about taking a chance on him if I were Danny. However, he seems to have regressed since 2007. If he’s the last option, he may be the right choice. Right now, Boston needs to set their sights on McDyess, Sheed, Andersen, or Gortat.
by CelticWes34 on Jun 10, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
McDyess would be my prime target. I don`t know how much he wants but bi-annual exception might be enough. Then I would like to add a true center. I like Pachulia but he will probably command too much. If we can get Sheed for the MLE I would do it, if not Wilcox for around 3-4 mio…
Of course, in the end it all comes down to the money. I don`t want to use our MLE on some average guy. If we can`t get a good big man then I would sign our long lost son Robert Swift for the minimum. He has length and he has shown in flashes that he can be a solid player…
by thebirdman on Jun 10, 2009 8:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wha??
No way to Swift. This guy has played, what, like 40 games in 4 seasons? With all the injuries the Celtics had last year there is no need to take a chance on Swift. Boston needs to try and get Chris Andersen.
by CelticWes34 on Jun 10, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is Andersen will get 4-5 million more than Swift…Swift would be 6th big man nothing more. Just some height as insurance if someone gets injured…
by thebirdman on Jun 10, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’ve touched on my reason for wantin Ra instead of McDyess. I don’t think we can sign on PF AND a center. With Ra, we get both. With McDyess, we realistically only get one. Someone like Gasol would be too big for McDyess.
by droopdog7 on Jun 10, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we need both
We need a pf and a center because Big Baby it’s gone and powe it’s not going to play until allstar thats why singing McDyess and a truly Big center it make sence.
by celt4ever on Jun 10, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My list, in order, is McDyess, Gortat, Rasho and Pachulia. I’ve read (DX) that the price for Gortat and Pachulia is the full MLE, with the bidding being over the number of years. I think it would be much the same for McDyess and Rasho, maybe a little less.
I have also read that Birdman is likely to get paid in this conract, though what that means I’m not sure; I’m thinking $3-5MM. Wilcox has recently said he’d like to return to the Knicks, which may mean that he’s too dumb to pursue.
I think we can expect to spend the full MLE, or close to it, for a backup C. But in my opinion it’s necessary.
And of course, you can pencil in Robert Swift as our 12th man right now, LOL.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 8:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rasho won`t come to the celtics. He didn`t get along with KG in MIN and he really prefers a more “international” environment. Since we don`t have any international players on the team he wouldn`t feel too comfortable here, IMO.
TOR is the primary target for him in the NBA but it is also very likely that he returns to Europe like he mentioned just a few days ago in an interview.
by thebirdman on Jun 10, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
dollars and sense
Sonebody here probably has a partial handle on how much money these free agents can expect to obtain. And if so, then I’d like to hear about it. Because if we’re just going to compare apples to oranges, then I don’t know why Marcin Gortat wouldn’t be the guy to get.
by no kidding on Jun 10, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Predicting salaries is always tough...
I mean, who would have imagined that Duhon and Pietrus would get nearly full MLE deals last year?
I do think Gortat, Zaza, and Rasheed will all be looking for the full MLE, though.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 10, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also like the idea
of perhaps using the full MLE, but for a limited number of years – like 2-3 years or in some cases only 1
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 10, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
absolutely agree
if the right player is there for it — read: mcdyess — then give him the full but for 2 years, maybe 3.
by ssspence on Jun 10, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
We can’t be building our bench from scratch every year. Given that we are likely to be restricted to the MLE and LLE over the next few years, I’d be trying to get bench players for 3-4 years if possible, so we can eventually accumulate a deep enough bench.
That’s also the problem with trying to get ring-chasers at the trade deadline.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
… but there are only a full players I’d give the full MLE to. Marion is one of them, if he’d take that. Same thing with Gortat, I think, although he’s a gamble.
The problem with using the full MLE on one player, of course, is that you only have the $2 million LLE and minimum salary exceptions to fill the other holes. (Although, of course, we could always bring BBD back as well.)
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 10, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
will anyone pay marion the full MLE over 4 years? 5 years?
you have to wonder who (perhaps besides Toronto). might he take the full MLE for 3 years to play in Boston? probably not.
by ssspence on Jun 10, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
true but if we added marion that fills our biggest need. let me just say i dont think marie will take the MLE unless nothing out there and he’d likely go to NY if he does. scal, tony could be packaged for up to $7.3m which COULD net a decent player at PG or center.
id much rather have artest than marion but i dont think we can pull it off without a sign and trade(not likely). id also love to see us get camby but i just cant see teh clippers taking scal, tony, pruitt and a future pic for him.
house, marion, baby, walker, gidden, baby, camby would be a decent bench. we could ten try to land a decent backup point like bobby jackson cheap
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 10, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Baby is coming back
Reason? Wyc has expressed a willingness to spend money. The only money he CAN spend, however, is just the MLE and LLE … and the $ needed to re-sign Baby. Because that’s one of the few options for fixing our holes with just money, I think it will happen.
I’m somewhat agnostic on whether our biggest need is a backup big or a backup SF. I dunno about Marion though. Seeing him on Toronto, where he was bad, made me wonder if he isn’t the kind of player who can ONLY thirve in a super uptempo style.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously we need another big. We probably need two, even if BBD comes back.
But this whole issue of vets is killing me. It’s like Doc doesn’t want anyone under 30. Mikki and Marbury were vets, yet they were not the right vets. I’d like to get the right players regardless of their experience. But Doc has to be willing to let players play, make the mistakes, and learn.
by amenhotep04 on Jun 10, 2009 9:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
get the right players regardless of their experience
that’s the true essense of what needs to be accomplished. age doesn’t necessarily make a player better or a better fit for the team
by slamtheking on Jun 10, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if some sort of trade ever happens with PHX --
i’d like to take a shot with robin lopez. he had a good motor and was good defender in college. i know i know, he’s not a vet. i’m saying as a throw in another deal.
by ssspence on Jun 10, 2009 9:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
At least he has length. Better him at the end of the bench than 4 smalls who never play.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bigs
are always going to get good money as long as they are competent. That said Jeff Foster is who I want, always have. McDyess and Foster and we are in business!
by celty86 on Jun 10, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Please No Non-centers
McDyess, Joe Smith, Wilcox, Gooden, Shelden Williams and Chris Andersen are power forwards, not centers. Andersen is way too skinny to defend good post players. Wilcox and Gooden are both knuckleheads.
The available FA centers, in order of talent are
Sheed
Gortat
Za Za
Rasho
Swift
Elson
Mikki Moore
Swift is injury prone, and Elson is a journeyman like Moore.
The first three guys on the above list are worth every penny of the MLE.
As for trades, I like Collison alot but he’s really a power forward too. Nice, fundamentally sound player though. Channing Frye is a marshmallow and Darko seems incapable of living up to his potential. Same with Kwame Brown
Camby would be nice, but almost certainly out of our price range. I think DeSagana Diop or Robin Lopez (the Lopez twin in Phoenix) would be more realistic trade targets.
You might be able to get Jeff Foster in a Ray Allen deal with Indiana. The deal would be Ray for Foster, Marquis Daniels and Jarrett Jack (although the Pacers would probably insist on the Celtics taking Tinsley instead of Jack). The deal is complicated by the fact that Daniels is untradeable at the moment (team option for next year hasn’t been exercised). Also, I think the Celtics could get more for Ray from a team like Charlotte.
by Brickowski on Jun 10, 2009 10:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good points
except I like Rasho more than you, and Darko has actually turned into a guy who can reliably (1) defend the post and (2) knock down a face-up shot. That he hasn’t reached his potential doesn’t change that.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NOT friends
McDyess is perfect and anyone else is a distant 2nd of the usual suspects…..but while he & KG share the same agent they are not friends,in fact the opposite…Sheed and Joe Smith are his buddies…but $$$$ talks so it won’t matter
by Motown on Jun 10, 2009 10:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anderson
I would love to see him blocking shots and KG punching his chest in the ’10 Finals vs LAKERS!!!
by mec1 on Jun 10, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
KG ... KG ...
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen"
~ Michael Jordan
by ChiBullsFan on Jun 10, 2009 10:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you saying that they do not like each other? I have not heard that. But as you say, it is about money and opportunity to win anyway.
by droopdog7 on Jun 10, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe...
This is why DA wants the 2nd pick to snag the underdeveloped but who’s potential could be Hakeem Olajuwon which is Thabeet.
He can play backup minutes behind KG and Perk since he would be a rookie. I know he he far from being polished but he is 7’3" which already has a good sense of Defense…He is perhaps even far more developed than when Perk entered the league.
Problem though is how do we get him without givin up RR.
"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."
by bopna on Jun 10, 2009 10:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Whoa...
Thabeet doesn’t have anywhere near the potential to be Hakeem. Why do you think that? He’s not as quick, fluid, and he doesn’t have close to the same moves in the post.
I’m thinking his upside is more like Mark Eaton.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 10, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
… or Saer Sene.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thabeet is far more mutumbo than olajuwon…not that it’s a bad thing having a beast under the basket
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 10, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
with remembering9ergods.
"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"
by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jun 12, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabeet is about a million miles away from Olajuwon. Hakeem had real skills. Thrabeet is just big. He’s a major project who could very easily flop.
by Brickowski on Jun 10, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Clearly Bricks idea that we need a TRUE CENTER back up is the right way to go.
We already have two guys who can play pf. we need a BIG who is strong and long and can back up Perk. We already have Powe, Baby and Scal. no more 6’9" or shorter guys.
I realize the problem is its slim pickings
by wahz on Jun 10, 2009 11:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
true but
if you can get McDyess, you do it and worry about adding a true 7 footer after the fact
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 10, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 10, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
And remeber that Robert Swift is a given.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Not Mikki Moore
I like McDyess, but am not sure how much he has left. He would be a great influence in the clubhouse. I wouldn’t be quick to rule out Mikki Moore. He definitely didn’t get it done this season, but with a training camp he could be better. He’s got ht, energy, can open the floor a bit and can score under the basket. None of the other choices listed impress me that much. Perk is just so important to us. I know we are looking for a backup, but I think a backup should at least be able to compete with Perk for the starter’s role. No one listed here, and not that many in the league fill the bill. We could probably toss 15 mill to the LA guy (Bynum-?FA).
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Jun 10, 2009 11:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Antonio McDyess is about 6,000 times better than Mikki Moore...
Also, we can’t offer a free agent $15 million, and Andrew Bynum isn’t a free agent; he signed an extension with LA.
Back to the point, though, Mikki was the same player in Boston that he was in Sacramento: foul-prone and slow to rotate. He’s a mediocre rebounder and a terrible defender. The only thing he can do is occasionally hit open jumpers.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 10, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take him back....
as a 3rd string center, but only after we see what else is out there
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 10, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Am I having a senior moment?
Isn’t Odom a FA this summer?
by The Real Large James 2 on Jun 10, 2009 11:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes he is
but I’ve always assumed he’d be too expensive for us
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 10, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Same needs as last year
“Our team needs are no big mystery. Doc himself laid them out in detail. We need veterans, and we need depth at center, small forward, and point guard.”
Exactly the same needs as last year. Can Danny get that done with just the MLE, LLE, and our minor expirings (not including Ray)? Didn’t happen last year. Danny’s gotta have a better off-season this year. I’m glad he’ll be out there “kicking the tires”, as Jeff said. Unusual economic times, so some team might do something crazy. And if Danny can get something like two 15 cent pieces (if there were such a thing) for Ray’s quarter, he just might do it, with the idea being that your starting two might not be quite as good as Ray, but your backup upgrades might be so much better than they otherwise would have been that he feels its worth it (just as an example, getting two of GS’s quality swing guys, like Maggette + Ellis… or some such).
I don’t think a Ray trade is likely, but I’m actually glad that Danny has that chip as something to explore. Then, as has been hashed out here many times, we wonder just how the C’s value Rondo, and how much they want to commit to him for the long haul.
Finally, we know that management wants to maximize this window (though they did a crappy job of it last off-season), but as someone else had mentioned, they might be a little conflicted about falling off the cliff in a year or two, and the only way to avoid that is to trade our huge Big 3 contracts as they expire.
Interesting times are upon us. More interesting than last year, I think, with Ray and Rondo decisions pending.
by Mencius on Jun 10, 2009 11:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
not quite
“Exactly the same needs as last year. Can Danny get that done with just the MLE, LLE, and our minor expirings (not including Ray)? Didn’t happen last year. "
The biggest differences between last year and this year is that Danny actually has some expiring contracts he can use in a trade and the FA crop is much better this year.
Last year he had Powe and BBD as expiring deals coming into this year. Not going to get much with that. This year he’s got Scal, TA, House (assuming he picks up his option), Pruitt (if the C’s take his option) and Walker/Giddens (if they aren’t extended their offers). big difference.
Also last year, there weren’t many quality FA’s. This year, there are many options to consider that didn’t exist last year. Think about it. POB was their big man signing last year. Big difference from the list of candidates being discussed in this thread for this year.
by slamtheking on Jun 10, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree that his opportunities to fill the needs ought to be greater with more expirings at his disposal. What I was referring to as the same are the positional needs. POB was a blown opportunity by Danny. I think Anderson could and should have been had.
by Mencius on Jun 10, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zaza Pachulia and Antonio McDyess are my two favourite targets for that spot.
I’m not sure which one I’d prefer. I think Dice is currently the superior player … but Zaza is a legit center and he can be signed and relied upon for the next 3-4 seasons. It’d be nice to have that spot locked up for all that time. It’s also much easier to find a cheap quality backup power forward than a seven foot center, so filling that second big off the bench spot would be a lot easier with Zaza.
by Who on Jun 10, 2009 11:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
gortat going to the knicks is a sure thing because they are the only team he has a chance to start for.
i like mcdyess, anderson, im kinda cooling on rasheed.
i would LOVE a trade for camby.
another guy i like but we probably cant get is hilton armstrong of the hornets
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 10, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sign McDyess, Then Sign A Backup Center
I have a question, if the C’s do sign McDyess, who is the backup center with length?
Jason Collins? Robert Swift? Adonal Foyle? Chris Mihm? Jamaal Magloire? Cheikh Samb? Theo Ratliff? Calvin Booth?
Ratliff looks the only player there good enough to be a regular in someone’s rotation. Otherwise you’re looking at a third string center who’s a big drop off from whoever the other second big man is (Powe? Davis?).
by Who on Jun 10, 2009 12:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Would Rasho Nesterovic take the minimum to be the fourth big in the rotation?
He’d be a great get in that scenario. I’m doubtful though, I think he’ll have better options open to him.
by Who on Jun 10, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's coming off an $8 million deal
so I doubt anything much short of the MLE would do it.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 12:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why the Infatuation with McDyess?
McDyess is a decent player, but he’s a 6-9 elbow jump shooter with no post up game, and he doesn’t defend any better than BBD. You want a true center as the backup so that Garnett never has to move over to center and bang with the 275 pounders. You want as little wear and tear on KG as humanly possible.
I’ll tell you another guy I like: Aaron Gray. I thought he would be a bust coming out of Pitt, but he’s proven me wrong. He could give a nice 15 minutes a game backing up Perkins. He can bang and he can score, too.
by Brickowski on Jun 10, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Aaron Gray can score?
Apparently this happened after Bulls games. He has low-post moves, but is so slow almost any post defender with size can block his shot.
He’s a restricted FA and the Bulls will likely make the qualifying offer (little over 1 million dollars). If Boston feels like paying an extra couple million for a backup center, then I don’t think the Bulls would care enough to match that offer.
That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 10, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gray scored at a much better clip last year, when he actually got some playing time.
by Brickowski on Jun 10, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As in 2007-2008?
He averaged more minutes this season and started 18 games. He had his chances and sucked, big time. He is simply too slow to contribute on a nightly basis.
That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT
by Ozzie Montana on Jun 10, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
McDyess — Not a center but an excellent sixth man — I’d add rebounding to your description of McDyess, he’s a terrific rebounder.
I thought Dice was Detroit’s best player last season. He’d be a very nice player to have coming off the bench.
by Who on Jun 10, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on Aaron Gray
I thought of him too, but no way the Bulls will let him come to the Cs. He’s what we should be looking for with #58, though.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Jun 10, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems to me...
If the C’s pick up a PF, then they’d have to plan on resigning baby. That makes the positions in need as Backup PF, SF, PG, C instead of C, SF, PG.
To aleviate this, they may be planning on offering BBD his 20% raise, using the full MLE to offer for sheed, and the vet minimum for a SF who can play D and shoot, and a standard raise for pruitt/marbury.
The more i think about the situation, i really think the C’s are looking for flexibility that posey gave them. They’ll be looking for a vet that can play the 3 and 4 and shoot, or a vet that can play the 4 and 5.
by cordialb on Jun 10, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There are some players who can provide that kind of flexibility at the 3-4, e.g. Boris Diaw or Gerald Wallace, but I don’t see any free agents who could fill that role, unless Shawn Marion is willing to play for the MLE.
One young player I’ve always liked in Julian Wright. I wonder what it would take to get him from the Hornets.
by Brickowski on Jun 10, 2009 2:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Big Man
Gortat is big! I like him a lot, although you couldn’t play him and Perk together.
I like Kamen but he’s to expensive same with Camby.
by Little D on Jun 10, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
celts need backup center???
i agree perk needs a backup ilove the possibilty of rasheed za za pachulia is another option i would like to see that center they drafted from turkey i think his name is semihn erdih some weird name does anyone know his status on coming to the celtics next year …..
by lohaus#54 on Jun 10, 2009 3:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wright
Brick, I like Wright too but I don’t think he is that good of a shooter. Still like him though.
by celty86 on Jun 10, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He isn’t a good shooter, but the rest of his game is good. He’s a slasher and defends well.
by Brickowski on Jun 10, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
CALL ME CRAZY
but I see that guy Pachulia being a good pickup, and maybe even a starter somewhere at some point. He was the Hawks’ Center until Horford arrived, and he was productive. He can actually start in the eventuality that Perkins goes down for some time. He would be great for a backup at 4/5. I’s still want to get McDyess though. That would solidify Backup Center and backup PF.,
by correcttitle on Jun 10, 2009 4:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i thought pobryant was going to be the rabbit out of the hat. was i wrong. of all the names i’ve heard the 1 i would give the money to is zsa zsa. i like mcdyss but is he a center? i like gray and there must be a bonner out there that we can grab.
by nazzbo on Jun 10, 2009 4:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Who are the cheap big men?
Which guys can probably be had for the vet minimum or close to it?
It feels like you either resign Big Baby or blow all or most of the MLE on a big guy, whichever gives you better value, but you still have to sign someone else for depth.
To put it another way, who is out there who might be a candidate for the end of the bench who is unlikely to command more money as a free agent than Mikki Moore?
by LooseCannon on Jun 10, 2009 5:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Definitely spend what's available on a center.
A cheap big man won’t cut it in next year’s playoffs. It’s been said elsewhere here, but If the Celtics will spend the money, they should put it all on a true 5, instead of a 4. Gortat or Pachulia would suit me fine.
As for a backup 4 and 3, maybe Ainge can find someone in the league’s bargain bin. Still, as a 4, there’s Scalabrine, and hopefully when it counts, Powe (I’m figuring Glen Davis is gone). Doc needs to play Bill Walker and find out what he can really get from the kid. Otherwise, bring Ray Allen off the bench to replace Pierce, and give the second unit some scoring (oh crud, that could mean starting Giddens or Pruitt as a 2). Dang it, somebody: Walker, Pruitt, or Giddens needs to step up and earn their money.
by no kidding on Jun 10, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Odom is an FA
Then you deal Ray this summer and sign Odom and maybe another shooting guard.
by The Real Large James 2 on Jun 10, 2009 6:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
how about a 4 way trade?
celtics get camby and will bynum(pistons PG)
pistons get david lee (knicks)
clippers get kwame brown, nate robinson, #8 pick(knicks), future draft pick(either celtics, pistons or knicks)
knicks get amir johnson, scal, #2 pick(clippers)
salaries match up.
knicks get young, cheap talent and expiring contracts.
clippers get a scorer in robinson and manage to trade down pic up and extra pick.
detroit gets the young low post guy they want.
celtics get a great defensive center, and a young backup PG without adding salary. they can then try and use the full MLE on a SF
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 10, 2009 6:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Center in the upcoming draft
Anyone here thinks Kenny George will be taken by the time the Celtics pick at number 58? A 7’8" shotblocker and rebounder as a backup, and everyone knows we won’t be relying on him for an offensive game. He’ll come in cheap also. Who knows what Clifford Ray can do to him?
by Green Deuce on Jun 10, 2009 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
kenny george
will likely go undrafted because of his health issues
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 10, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
however
if a team could sign him for pennies on the dollar he would make a good 3rd center/project. you cant teach height and teams drool over it
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 11, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
?
so the C’s essentially get Camby and Bynum (who they had a while ago and cut) for Veal AND the salaries work?
that doesn’t seem possible. (not that the trade would happen because the Clippers get hosed)
by slamtheking on Jun 11, 2009 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
camby only make $7.6m
i forgot to add pruitt ($6.7m with the others)in there but it does work out because your allowed to take on an extra 25% of teh salaries sent out. so we gain about $1m in salary.
the clippers would actually get the expiring contract of kwame, nate robinson would help their offense alot, the #8 pick this year and another 1st rounder next year.
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 11, 2009 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This...
I don’t agree. Why not David Lee to the Celtic’s?
"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"
by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jun 12, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
center
i really feel that we need a center more than a power forward. and if we do the pruitt+ta+scal+giddens for nocioni trade, we have the full mle to use for a backup center
by ryarocker on Jun 10, 2009 10:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What we need
I think what we need is someone who is comfortable playing both 4 and 5; someone as atheletic as Howard but with the skills of Yao.
by 33-32-00 on Jun 10, 2009 10:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thats too much to ask
that guy would be a superstar, better than lbj il say
by ryarocker on Jun 10, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
get Camby for a second round pick....
probably not that cheap, but Camby can be had for a salary dump of TA, Pruitt, Scal and cash.
or Danny could get one of the cheap vets like:
Jamaal Magloire to back up Perk
Austin Croshere to back up KG or 6th man.
Hornets are in salary dump mode, so perhaps Rasaul Butler for Scal? A long defender, can shoot threes, gives Pierce rest.
by CN_extreme on Jun 11, 2009 3:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You can’t get Camby for a salary dump. His contract is expiring too.
by Brickowski on Jun 11, 2009 7:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't need swing 4/5's
Brickowski was right. We’ve got backup 4s. Good ones too. I was surprised also by Aaron Gray early in the year and then surprised that he completely disappeared when they got Miller. I think the Bulls will hold onto him.
Whatever happened to that guy Tiago Splitter in Europe?
by Wildblu1 on Jun 11, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tiago Splitter
He was drafted by the Spurs last year.
by Little D on Jun 11, 2009 12:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Splitter decided to stay in Europe
Better money.
by Brickowski on Jun 11, 2009 8:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Last season...
I have mentioned a few times, to get a good player, the C’s will have to trade a starter. If it’s RayRay and Rajon for a top 5 pick and a veteran, I am all for it. RR and RA will be a big lost, no doubt in the Cornbread-for-Walton category, and it will bring on an endless topic and debate for the people who are either in favor or not.
But, for those two starters, the C’s can get from the Kings: The 4th overall pick and either one or two of the following players: Jason Thompson, Andres Nocioni, or Beno Udrih. If the C’s get Jason Thompson, the C’s will select a 1; if Udrih, a 4 or a 5. Is this trade high risk? Of course it is. Is it a possible high reward, as well? Damn straight!
"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"
by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jun 12, 2009 10:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I forgot to add....
that Marbury, if re-signed, will have the whole off-season and regular season, to (re)acquaint with the system. And if Rondo is indeed traded, could very well start for the C’s this year and possibly next, with either Udrih or (if drafted) Rubio, Evans, Patty Mills(who hopefully could slip to the C’s 2nd round slot), or Flynn, as the back-up.
"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"
by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jun 12, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

























