Rumor: Ainge Offered Perkins, Walker for #2 Pick
Mike Felger is reporting that Ainge offered Perkins and Bill Walker to the Grizzlies for the number 2 pick.
Celtics Stuff Live (Comcast) has the actual quote:
"We heard a rumble today, just a little rumble. Danny’s throwing a bunch of stuff against the wall as he likes to do. Memphis sitting there at number two. Perk and was it JR Giddens?" (Tanguay clarifies it’s Bill Walker).
My gut reaction: I don't like it at all. Perkins is a perfect fit for this defense and I don't know if the 2nd pick will be worth giving that up. Even if you don't mind the pricetag, who plays center? We'd litterally be out of big men options. Does this mean Ainge would still want to pick Evans or would he go for Thabeet? If so, isn't that an immediate downgrade on the roster (for no apparent reason)?
As with any rumor like this, take with a grain of salt. Just more smoke indicating a fire somewhere in those hills.
0 recs |
126 comments
|
Comments
Gut reaction: I hate it. More reason to worry if Ainge has lost his mind.
by CoachBo on Jun 15, 2009 11:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
my take
is that if this move is made, it would be the first in a series of moves, with the C’s acquiring Amare via another trade or adding some one like Sheed or ZaZa via FA. Either way, I really don’t like it. I think the best way to bring banner 18 home is to keep the starting five, sign a couple of good FA’s and kick some ass in 2009-10.
by SCBirdman33 on Jun 15, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly...
If this trade was actually considered, it was part one of a two part deal…moving Perkins only makes sense if the next move is to get Amare….Ainge would draft his favorite PG at 2 if this deal went down – my vote is for Jonny Flynn but Rubio is likely most game ready…
Don’t be so quick to judge, Ainge is looking at all options…
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't see anyone trading for Amare right now --
the guys eye injury could trash his career.
by ssspence on Jun 16, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not only the eye thing...
But Amare plays no D. The big men on Boston have to play defense. It’s the core of the team. Thabeet was actually a great defender in college so that makes a little more sense than just “throwing stuff against the wall.”
by Jordinho on Jun 16, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope, and believe, that Ainge is much too intelligent for that.
And that is setting a very low q. for i. Danny may be talking to people, but I do not believe this rumor.
by thirstyboots18 on Jun 17, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe an expanded deal with NO?
Some combo of Rondo, #2 pick, Ray’s expiring deal to NO for CP3, T.Chandler, Posey….?
by johnny0723 on Jun 15, 2009 11:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
interesting but paul i would think is untouchable.
as for the perkins, walker deal i dont like it either. perkins shut down howard one on one. walker is going to be big this year i believe.
i really like thabeet but what if he struggles. what then?
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 15, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A resounding 'NO'
… to trading Perkin.
by 33-32-00 on Jun 15, 2009 11:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I posted this in the forums
but how about getting Amare and Barbosa and the #14 (or whatever they have) for Ray and TA and Scal and the #2?
by BballTim on Jun 15, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's an interesting thought
Packaging the #2 with Ray’s expiring could be plenty enticing to some team, whether it be Phoenix or not. Doing that and getting back some good vets could be conceivable. A little leery about giving up Perk’s defense though, but as has been noted, maybe the shoulder is a bigger concern than we realize.
Ainge sure keeps things interesting.
by Mencius on Jun 15, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Losing Perk would damage our whole defensive schemes
Unless another trade came after this, i cannot think of any positives of this one
by greenwise on Jun 15, 2009 11:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My gut reaction
I don’t like it either. Perk is a very good anchor for our defense, and we simply could not replace his defensive presence with anybody in the draft. If we were in rebuilding mode already, maybe somebody in the draft would have better long term potential than Perk, but for this year and maybe next (our present window as I see it), I don’t think anybody in the draft can give us what Perk can.
Frankly makes no sense for Memphis either, because they ARE in rebuilding (or building in their case) mode. It’s a lose – lose.
by Mencius on Jun 15, 2009 11:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
RE: My Gut Reaction
I think this is a lot of smoke and won’t get done.
I love Perkins, every team needs a guy who is a beast on the inside, a player that other teams don’t want to mess with. He intimidates with his size, strength and willingness to knock somebody in to next week. And that scowl probably scares even KG.
So why would Danny do this deal.
1. Maybe he’s more concerned with Perk’s shoulder. This is a chronic deal, that probably won’t get better.
2. He had a good season and a great playoffs and his value is high.
3. He has a very modest salary with 2 or 3 years remaining.
4. Danny is looking for a homerun – and I’d be shocked if he didn’t take Thabett if he got the 2nd pick.
Why would Memphis do the deal
1. I don’t know, why did Memphis trade Gasol to LA for 2 gum wrapper and a piece of Pizza?.
2. Maybe to add a veteran and winner to a young team
3. To save money. Thabeet will cost more than Perkins over the next 2 or 3 years.
4. Scared also comes to mind. What if Thabeet is a bust and Robio decides that he won’t play for Memphis and stays in Europe. Heisley wants to sell the team and if this pick is screwed up it will cost him Big $$$$$. Perkins is a known value, he a solid, proven center.
I’m with the posters who want to keep the starting five and add bench pieces to win next year. But Danny and Wyc are looking at this year and 5 or more years down the road. I know Danny has a vision of what he wants to team to be. I don’t know what that vision is and I don’t think he’s going to tell me or anyone else for that matter. He’s not afraid to tinker with the pieces or blow it up and start all over. So we should not be surprised at anything he does.
by badax33 on Jun 16, 2009 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another Thought
Maybe Danny is trying to see if Memphis intention is to trade the #2 pick. It’s like an auctiion, with Danny bidding less and less. Heck Memphis is so screwed up maybe they’ll do a sign and trade for BBD and Bill Walker, or Walker and money, who knows with those guys. Like someone said Danny is just kicking the tires and seeing what’s out there.
by badax33 on Jun 16, 2009 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never agreed with Coach Bo before.....
…but I do here. Perk is as much of the glue of the Celtics now as anyone. Not a headline grabber but a solid double double threat every night. He played Howard better than anybody. Can Perk get better? If Danny thinks “No” then this is possible, but it sure seems to me he can continue to get better. Perk is a pretty inarticulate interview but his likability is high thanks to his effort, grit, got-your-back style. Thabeet doesn’t seem that sure a bet to me. Hell, look at Greg Oden!
by Wildblu1 on Jun 15, 2009 11:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On the surface it doesn't sound good
But understand there would be more moves to follow, like with the #5 pick for Ray being followed by KG. Not surprising I guess that people here have such short memories, but more than gut reaction is needed to determine if Ainge lost his mind. Poll after Poll had people saying no to KG for Big Al straight up, let alone with Gomes, Green, etc. yet that move along with acquiring Ray brought 17. It never would have happened if anyone here was deciding, Big Al was untradeable.
As a fan do I want to lose Perk? Of course not. But, like with KG, I have to believe in Danny somewhat that there is a master plan with more shoes to drop, just like before. Even the day of the KG trade, many were lamenting Al’s departure, as was I from an emotional level. Danny proved however that the sum of his moves were better than standing pat with a popular, valuable player. I think he is capable of that again if he decided to move Perk.
by KJ33 on Jun 15, 2009 11:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good point, KJ
I was incensed when we traded the #5 for Ray, because I didn’t think we could still get KG, and thought just getting Ray didn’t really make us a title contender, and was therefore a stupid move to pacify Pierce and an impatient fan base. Ainge knew better.
by Mencius on Jun 15, 2009 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just to play devil's advocate though
Maybe Danny thinks that the presence of the Big 3 make Rondo and Perk look much better than they are, and he thinks he can capitalize on that. Not my thinking, but it could be his.
by Mencius on Jun 15, 2009 11:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ainge wants Thabeet real bad!
I can`t blame him, he has the right idea….but losing Perk is way too risky right now.
This could only work if DA could also acquire another veteran center {not as good as Perk} for the coming year.
by Title 18 on Jun 15, 2009 11:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No he doesn't...
Nobody wants Thabeet – the guy sucks..
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Say what?!?
“Nobody wants Thabeet—the guy sucks”.
Next week we`ll see how “nobody wants Thabeet”……he`ll be selected so fast your head will spin!
When you have a chance to grab a 7`3" shot-blocking machine…you DON`T sit back and say, “No thanks, I`d rather have some guard from Spain named Ricky”!
by Title 18 on Jun 16, 2009 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd Rather Have the Guard Named Ricky
Rubio is a sure-fire star. He’s the second best guard in Europe and he’s still a teenager. (The best is Dimitrius Diamantidis, IMHO). Rubio is also 6-4 and could easily play either guard position. Rondo Rubio would be one hell of a young backcourt.
I wont predict that Thrabeet will be a bust, but he is certainly a project. It will be three years before he contrributes, and if he does he will be like Mutombo. Perkins for Thrabeet would be a downgrade.
by Brickowski on Jun 16, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huge difference...
Being a “sure-fire star” in Europe means NOTHING when competing against top NBA talent!
Kobe, LeBron, CP3, Williams, Roy, and others are all shaking in their boots over the thought of facing “Ricky Euro-Trash”.
by Title 18 on Jun 16, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perk"s shoulder
Could be part of the thinking here too. Danny obviously knows more specifics on his medical issue, and separated shoulders can be very chronic. You can only do so much with surgery, it is likely to continue to give him problems throughout his career.
by KJ33 on Jun 15, 2009 11:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No question it`s a concern to DA...
Perk`s shoulder is an issue…it`s popping out roughly twice per year.
by Title 18 on Jun 15, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't do this deal for Thabeet,
but that’s because I think he’s a bust, anyone else who’s in being looked at in the top 5 absolutely. Listen I love Perk but with the #2 pick in the draft you can grab someone who is going to be a potential all-star (something perk will not be) and build a solid base for the future with rondo. You gotta take off the green lenses on this one. If we did that we could easily trade for a center or sign someone like gortat who can probably give us 80-90 percent of what Perk does, maybe more if they don’t commit 2-3 moving screens a game.
by Byrdman on Jun 15, 2009 11:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You think Thabeet is a bust?
Without him having played an NBA game yet? Wow, that has to be the fastest ever. I respectfully disagree. My concern for the C’s would be for ‘09, but I believe Thabeet has a bright future. I’ve watched him at Uconn the last 3 years, including a practice where I heard Calhoun say he was his most talented big man ever with a much greater upside than Okafor.
He is a great athlete, runs the floor very well, and is still learning. His athleticism makes him appear shorter than he really is on TV. He is a legit 7’3". He has played basketball for only 5 years, and has improved by leaps and bounds in 3 years time. As a freshman, he could barely catch and dunk the ball, by this past year he was the Big East player of the year. He could end up being somewhere between Mutombo and Olajuwon. Every bit the defender that Mutombo was, but a better offensive player, just not on Hakeem’s level. He is suited for the pro game and his best years are ahead for sure.
Whether the C’s get him or not, I believe he will be a very good to great NBA center in time. What makes you think he is already a bust curiously?
by KJ33 on Jun 16, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See Pitt v. Uconn
Blair demolished him. I’m sorry but he was never dominant in a big game and it’s going to be a whole different world in the NBA. Maybe he turns out to be good but I see him as a much bigger risk than a player like Rubio. If you think he’s gonna be a star that’s fine but calling me out for saying I think he won’t while mentioning his name along with Akeem is just as ridiculous. He has nowhere near the fluid style or footwork of Olajuwon.
by Byrdman on Jun 16, 2009 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll see
Ed Pinckney once dominated Patrick Ewing also……in college. Blair is a more accomplished player right now, think any GM would pick him over Thabeet? I can tell you haven’t seen Thabeet play much, and certainly not up close. His footwork, naturally, is excellent, just not in terms of basketball moves right now. Did you see Hakeem at Houston, again, in college? He had practically no moves at all. In college, teams collapse on big men, no illegal defenses, and rarely do they develop one on one moves because they are never covered one-on-one.
Hakeem’s great footwork you mention was nowhere to be found when he played, in college. He developed that as a pro. Thabeet in no way is a bigger risk than a Euro guard, the history of the league resoundingly proves that a 7’ 3" shot blocking, athletic big is a far better pick than any guard. We are not talking Sam Bowie, Jordan here, that is a once in a generation exception.
by KJ33 on Jun 16, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never dominant?
Again, you are only referring to offense when you say this. Haven’t we learned the Celtics calling card when they won #17 was defense? Thabeet absolutely dominated a tremendous amount of games on the defensive end. He set the single season block record in the Big East, surpassing Mourning, and intimidated countless would-be attempts by his sheer presence. When has Perk ever dominated offensively? That is not why people don’t want to trade him, it is because of his stellar D
by KJ33 on Jun 16, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
just when I thought we were free of the draft
I’m going to have to start looking at prospects…
I’m still hoping we go forward with our current starting five, though.
by BballTim on Jun 15, 2009 11:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I've said it before, I will say it again...
Danny likes Thabeet. He looks at him as a franchise type center that will rebound and block shots and someday be a Defensive Player of the Year. I’ve been saying it for over a week, Rubio would never have been picked at #2 because Danny and Doc had enough headaches trying to develop three different young PGs in West, Telfair, and Rondo. They succeeded in Rondo so he isn’t going anywhere.
On the other hand, Perk is starting to look like a very valuable commodity as he just was a beast in the playoffs, has shown to be one of the better one on one and team defensive centers in the league and has a nice salary for a couple years before you have to extend him.
Unfortunately, he might also have long term shoulder concerns and could be nearing his ceiling. Hence Danny offers him up for the #2 and figures if he drafts Thabeet and can sign an older guy for 2 years(Rasheed) he gets to slowly bring on Thabeet for a year or soas the backup and has Thabeet in a controlled salary situation for four years. When the Big Three era ends he has Rondo and Thabeet to build around as Thabeet could well be a monster with two to three years of playing under Coach Ray while banging everyday versus Wallace and Garnett.
Then if Pierce opts out next year and the Celtics actually have a chance at a LeBron or Wade or Bosh or Joe Johnson and the new era begins.
by nickagneta on Jun 15, 2009 11:33 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Guarentee...
…he doesn’t like Thabeet – especially at #2…
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stars
Danny knows that in the high end of the lottery you have to reach for stars. Thabeet will never be a star because his offense is so horrendous. He is a good help defender, but his frame isn’t big enough to put on real muscle to guard the meat of the league. Dikembe was a decently thick guy. Thabeet just has that wiry frame. He’s one of the best help defenders I have ever seen at the college level, but when even a guy like Leon Powe engages him in contact, he will muscle him over or draw a foul.
The last time Danny was looking in this 1-3 range, the guy turned out to be the best pg in the league. I’m willing to trust him here. In Niednagel we trust.
by jdpapa3 on Jun 16, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think he’s pretty good considering he didnt start playing basketball until 4-5 years ago. he will get better on offense especially with a good coach like clifford ray
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 16, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Patrick Ewing was “horrendous” on offense when he came into the league. Why are you describing him as a finished product? He has improved immeasurably in 3 years, eventually I believe he will have a midrange jumpshot, as well as a reliable hook. How would one describe Perk’s offense in his first year vs now? And admittedly, he is not all that great now, just a whole heck of a lot better than he was. Thabeet’s offense will develop, believe me, it already has started.
You are wrong about the Mutombo comparison by the way. If anything, it is the other way around. Thabeet is not wiry, he is lean, all muscle, runs the floor like a 6 footer. Mutombo is the wiry guy, I have never, ever heard him described as thick.
by KJ33 on Jun 16, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabeet isn't Ewing or Perk...
Forget what his physical skills could do – he does not come off as the type of guy that is going to work to be a great player – he is way more Sam Dalembert than Kendrick Perkins when it comes to what he wants to accomplish – Dalembert worked to get paid, but doesn’t compete to be the best center he can be – if he did he’d be more than just a cute, stat stuffer, he’d be an all star.
Don’t trust Thabeet at all, just don’t see it – bad court awareness, poor adjustment…lack of focus…he’s the million dollar package…with the 10 cent head…buyer beware…
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From all accounts..
from my contacts, Thabeet is a pretty damn intelligent guy and has worked his but off to get where he has in just the 4-5 years he has been playing organized ball. I don’t know where you are getting the lack of drive thing because from what I hear, he is a pretty confident guy who behinds the scenes craves to live up to all the expectations being put on him.
He had a couple of bad games against Blair this year but other than that he was one of the two most dominant big men in college ball this year. He blocked 4-5 shots a game and had to alter 10 more per game. Last year he was a late first rounder. This year he is pretty close to a consensus top 3 pick with all probability being a top 2 pick.
Thabeet was awful his first year in Storrs and has progressively taken big steps forward each year with Coach Calhoun calling him the best big man he ever coached even considering that he had only played ball for a short period of time. Sorry Bill, I don’t see or hear what you do.
by nickagneta on Jun 16, 2009 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It's all speculation at this point
So nobody’s opinion is going to be proven or not for several years. But I flat out disagree with you on his ethic, as does the UConn coaching staff. He was one of the hardest workers they ever had. His freshman year they made him shoot with a special glove because he was shooting from his palm, not his fingertips. He was on a kindergarten level with basketball-specific skills. He has shown huge improvement since then in only 2 years.
He is far smarter than you give him credit for, he just has a limited background in basketball. In a couple years, in my opinion, your comments will sound absurd.
by KJ33 on Jun 16, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wiry frame?
Reports I have read have him in the 270-275 pound range. He’s only 22. He could easily put on 15-20 pounds of muscle and keep all his agility and ups. Also, I read once upon a time that a guy named Marcus Camby would never make it in this league because he was too wiry. He only weighs 220 lbs. and has done pretty well for himself. Thabeet is 50 pounds bigger than Camby is or ever was.
by nickagneta on Jun 16, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agree
That Ainge likes Thabeet. Anyone who says he sucks is delusional. He’s only played 5 yrs of ball, and has made great strides in that time.With the way Garnett defends the basket, and the way Thabeet blocks shots, we’d have an incredible interior defense for the next several years.
by Tradetime on Jun 16, 2009 3:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
never going to happen,just a lot of smoke
by wopp22 on Jun 15, 2009 11:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I say
Let kick some ass in 2009-2010 DETHRONE The LAKERS!!
we need are current starting 5 next year
when they are healthy they are the best starting 5
and I say we need to improve the bench so
the starting 5 can get a rest and will not be injured
by Pipboy on Jun 15, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Reasons why I might do that deal.
1. This team can win without Perkins, as long as they have the others.
2. Thabeet possibly can be much better in the future.
3. Perkins has reached his ceiling for the most part, but Thabeet can be an all star, which Perkins will not be.
I still get an insurance like a Pachulia, but if it is Thabeet, then I do it and don’t look back.
by correcttitle on Jun 16, 2009 12:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Perk has a bum shoulder which is not going away, at least not in his lifetime. he is waht we call damaged goods". Ainge knows more about our players than we know. He mortgaged our future foe on flag and he got it. No more flags with our present team; so Flag número 17 cost us Al Jeff. and this year número 1 pick: Plus Delonte who has come on nicely, to Mater Po’s chagrin.
Now Ainge has to do something drastic to compensate for the heavy price he paid for just one flag. He is going for youth or "youts: a la Vinni Callo. They consider any number of possible scenarios of which we may never hear anything. We keep critizising(sic) as if we knew more than they do; but we keep pushing Scal into every trade as if all the other managers were utterly dumb; here we want a lot for a little; it just dont pan as we would like it to be. So be clam and take you Valium; Danny will do whatever he thinks is best within some economic boundaries that will come into play; He may hit the jackpot or it may go askew; but if everybody was so smart, Arenas, Kobe, Jordan, Bird, Pierce, would have been drafted earlier than they were
by Reyquila on Jun 16, 2009 12:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nooooooooooooooooo!!! We should NOT trade Perk.
Perk and Powe... the Next Big Thing
by FLCeltsFan on Jun 16, 2009 12:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Make no mistake that Danny Ainge is very serious about improving the team to compete for the title next year. Danny has, very publicly, also said that it is his job to listen to offers for players and pursue options that make the team better. Is Danny looking to move up in the draft? Sure. It’s his job to explore deals that bring in high quality talent. It would be very difficult for anyone to argue that Danny isn’t a great evaluator of talent. That’s what GMs do: build teams and try to improve their roster.
We also know that 90% of the rumors that float out there are nothing more than distortions of the truth. Sort of like bad games of the “Secret” game we all played in gradeschool. The more it gets passed around the more distorted it gets. Not to mention it’s not above the notion that there are some NBA “insiders” who have an interesting sense of humor when it comes to floating rumors.
Somehow I find it highly unlikely that Danny Ainge would be trying to trade Kendrick Perkins when both he and Doc have stated explicitly that this team needs to get bigger up front. “Let’s see, we need to get bigger up front,” says Doc Rivers. “I know!” says Danny, “Let’s trade Perk and the Walker kid for a SF/SG/PG combo player who could turn out to be the next Gerald Green!”
Somehow I doubt the conversation ever took place.
by tmcdon on Jun 16, 2009 12:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If they drafted Thabeet...
they would be getting bigger. But from what I remember Doc was looking to get older, not necessarily bigger. He said when KG went down the team “got young quick”.
by nickagneta on Jun 16, 2009 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
correct buddy
T here…
a possiblity, although unlikely is we add scal and tony to the deal and get milicic in the deal also.
if the team is seriously considering dealing perkins it’s because they’re worried about his health and/or resigning him and rondo.
having milicic and thabeet would give us two pretty good defensive 7 footers. milicic has developed a decent jumper and is still young and improving. he aslo has a 1 yr $7.5m deal if we dont like him. the size would allow us to use baby and powe when he returns at PF instead of C.
we could then go after a SF for the bench with the MLE, id love it if we landed brandon bass, trevor ariza, etc… hell id even take wally szczerbiak back for the right price. one of our big problems last year was the bench couldnt score. having baby/powe, thabeet, bass or szczerbiak on the bench would be alot more affective on offense. we could also try to add a vet PG like bobby jackson, brevin knight, or even keep marbury(even though he under performed).
i dont like the deal but im trying to stay open and explore all options…i didnt like the ray allen trade but added with the KG deal i was stoked. maybe he pulls off another OMG move that us fans just couldnt see coming
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 16, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You meant Thabeet and Milicic will be our centers next season?
by 33-32-00 on Jun 16, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats what i said
unlikely but possible.
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 16, 2009 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I admit to not having seen Thabeet that much, but when I have, he frequently gave me the impression of not being ready for prime time at the NBA level. He’s huge and can block shots, but iirc he got dominated by the Pitt big who’s about 6’7". In other words, he’s huge, so he can block shots, but somehow seemed a little soft all at the same time. I suspect if we nabbed the 2, it would not be for Thabeet.
Also, does anybody wonder why Memphis would trade the #2 for Perk. Perk’s a nice player and all, but I think his value is greater to our team as presently constituted than he would be to Memphis. Perk is what he is, which is great for us, but Memphis could probably grab a guy with more upside, and since they aren’t ready to contend this year, that makes more sense for them.
by Mencius on Jun 16, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The 6'7 Kid from Pitt
Is a sure fire first round pick probably a lottery pick. He is only 6’7 but has a 7’3 wingspan. Thabeet is extremely raw yet still the bigeast player of the year. That has to tell you something.
by Evantime34 on Jun 16, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand that Blair is beastly for his size (actually 6’6 and not 6’7), just that the times I saw Thabeet, there seemed a passive quality to him. He’ll probably be good down the road, but I don’t see him as a fit for our team right now.
by Mencius on Jun 16, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's play the "look a step ahead" game...
Just for kicks, so people stop seeing every move in isolation:
Hypothetical:
1. Ainge trades Perkins/Walker, etc for #2 pick and Warrick, Ross
2. Ainge trades Ray Allen/Rondo to Phoenix for Amare Stoudamire
3. Ainge drafts James Harden/Tyreke Evans with #2 pick
4. Ainge signs Stephon Marbury with part of MLE
5. Ainge signs McDyess for LLE or remainder of MLE
This leaves the team with:
KG/Amare/Pierce/Evans/Marbury – Still have 3 superstars, but Ray’s outside game is replaced by Amare’s inside game – a huge problem for this team going forward. Evans or whomever becomes the guard of the future to replace Ray, team uses Ross or allows rookie a shot at earning the 2 guard spot – or Eddie House starts…etc…2guards are easy to find and a star-level talent at the 2 usually produces early on.
Marbury is the one that would draw the most controversy here – I firmly believe that his age and talent will prevail with a full year under his belt – even the Marbury of the last 2 full seasons in NYC is a pick-and-roll genius who can serve as option 3b on an Amare/KG/Pierce led offensive attack.
Cleary Tom T would have to work Amare into a decent defender, but again, change of scenery may do him well in that dept – KG can’t hurt either. Totally different environment than Phoenix.
The team won a title with 3 new starters before and the team would only be bringing in 2 new players into the starting lineup as Marbury has half a season in the system.
Is it PROBABLE, no…but you can’t deny that that squad would have some serious firepower in the starting 5 and could put a better bench out there as well…so its not lunacy to see where this type of trade rumor could make more sense than simply trading Perkins for a pick…
Chances are, if the trade is crazy, there is more to come..
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Even better..
Forgot that Barbosa was a part of that rumor…
Barbosa becomes your 6th man with Dice, Davis, Scal, and House off the bench…Barbosa’s presence also allows for drafting a PG and potentially starting Barbosa at the 2…..options, optons, options…
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice
i like what you laid out here. this is one of those trades that would no way happen in a vacuum. There would have to be another deal in place. 14 included for memphis would make a lot of sense. i think we would still be legit contenders …only it would be for more than 1 year.
by jdpapa3 on Jun 16, 2009 12:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Warrick
is a free agent, isn’t he?
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 16, 2009 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's restricted
he has a $3m qualifying offer…
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jun 16, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
minutes
But where will the minutes be for Perkins when we bring Amare here?
I think Memphis does this deal if we throw in #14 from a Phoenix deal.
I have a feeling something big is going to happen next Thursday. There is no better time to extend the window than this summer.
Potential stars here to me are: Rubio, Evans, Flynn. All pg’s. Pick up JKidd at the MLE for a year to tutor them and wow.
I’m dreaming of a lineup of
1: Kidd/Flynn
2: Barbosa/House
3: Pierce/Giddens
4: KG/Dyess?
5: Amare/Nivens(draft)
by jdpapa3 on Jun 16, 2009 12:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Evans is not a PG...
…barely a combo guard – can’t run an offense and never will in all likelyhood…
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I concur.
He is definitely, IMHO, a poor man’s Delonte West without the gritty toughness and cool hair.
by nickagneta on Jun 16, 2009 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is Tough One....
Perkins to me is a top 5 center in the league. This reminds me of Al Jefferson. On top of his game and then we trade him. Perk has reached his potential, if not he’s very close. I’ll probably do the trade, 1: because of money (We could sign House to a good deal, possibly bring back Posey, and also resign Powe and Baby good deals, by sending away Allen and Scal. 2: because Thabeet can be as good as Perk if not better (More athletic and lengthy) in 5 years (the same duration for Perk). But I like Perk and I really don’t want to see him go. Let’s wait and see…
by Rtpas11 on Jun 16, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Love Perkins
I love Perkins for his tough play and great interviews, but the shoulder is scary. Two playoffs in a row he injured it. How can we rely on him when his shoulder can’t take the physical wear and tear of the playoffs.
I’m only saying this to acknowledge the reasoning behind trading him. I am withholding judgment since I have no idea if what is being talked about is only one of a series of trades to be made.
by guava_wrench on Jun 16, 2009 12:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why does Memphis do this?
Does anybody wonder why Memphis would trade the #2 for Perk. Perk’s a nice player and all, but I think his value is greater to our team as presently constituted than he would be to Memphis. Perk is what he is, which is great for us, but Memphis could probably grab a guy with more upside, and since they aren’t ready to contend this year, that makes more sense for them.
by Mencius on Jun 16, 2009 12:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
more interesting
it gets more interesting if we take one of their crap salaries in return
by jdpapa3 on Jun 16, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I think his value is greater to our team"
totally agree with that statement
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 16, 2009 7:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly...
This “deal” is more valuable to us on the board for fantasy “what if” play…
by BillfromBoston on Jun 16, 2009 12:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What I don't understand is ...
why Memphis would want Perk as signs point to Gasol being a pretty decent center. Memphis problem is the could use a stud PF or PG and are kind of loaded at the wing. But they are getting rebuked by Rubio and no other PG or PF projects to #2. Thabeet, Harden, Rubio, Evans, DeRozan, Flynn and Curry are all projected after griffin but Harden is a 2, Thabeet a center, Rubio won’t go to Memphis, Evans and Curry are combo guards, DeRozan is a 3 and Flynn isn’t good enough to be chosen in the top 4.
memphis will need to trade down to like seventh and get the Warriors pick and maybe grab Flynn, Jrue Holiday, Brandon Jennings or maybe Jordan Hill for the PF position.
by nickagneta on Jun 16, 2009 12:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anatomy Lesson
Perk = the spine
I’d hate to be a spineless team. But obviously, as has been stated, we’d have to see the other moves.
by Berkcelt on Jun 16, 2009 2:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Losing Perk = big hole in D
Who plays center on D if we lose Perk?
Do we force KG to do it and let bigger players lean on him (and his bad knee) all night long? Do we ask Amare to play down low? He’s even lighter than KG.
by Sophomore on Jun 16, 2009 5:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Every day there is a new rumor and every day I hate it!
It would be stupid to trade Perk for the second pick. Perk has shown how important he is for this team and he will keep his improvement over the next years. He is our anchor on defense, maybe more than KG, we saw it when Perkins missed one game in the Finals last year and the duo of Gasol and Odom was having fun in the paint, and we saw it when Perk missed a few games this season after Christmas, when the team was on a losing streak.
I like the fact that Danny is trying to acquire one of the top 5 picks but please do not trade any starting player or you can say goodbye to the title next year… you can’t replace one of the Big Three or Rondo or Perkins by a rookie who might be a bust.
by Drucci on Jun 16, 2009 6:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No one's going to be traded with the starting five..
.. Unless it is going to be a huge upgrade i.e. Dwight Howard replacing Perk, that kind of Upgrade. Their main focus is on maximizing the chances on getting no.18 next season, while garnett and pierce can still run, not taking a chance on untested players hoping they “MAY” be super stars in 5 years time or tanking til the 2011 FA are out. He’s most likely getting a FA or trade someone from the bench to get another supporting big guy.
It’s called rumors for a reason. I bet if a janitor on the C basketball camp said he heard something about a trade with playerA for playerB, a number of people here would be “OMG!!! OMG!! OMG!!”.
by thatswhatshesaid23 on Jun 16, 2009 6:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I dont care what he does....
he has to understand the window is closing and we have to win NOW
and there is little chance of winning a championship if there is a rookie in the starting lineup…
by hiro on Jun 16, 2009 7:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Larry Bird was a rookie when he won his first title.
by GreenGrizz on Jun 16, 2009 7:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He was in his second year
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 16, 2009 7:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Ainge missed what Perk did in the playoffs...
In fairness, I guess we don’t know how this would have fit together with other moves. Perk, however, is one of the best defensive centers in the league, and his offensive game looks better and better every year.
My gut reaction is, if Danny was after Thabeet or Evans I don’t like this deal at all.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 16, 2009 7:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Amusing how the only way to defend these moves is to assume – without any evidence – that it’d be part of some grand plan – in Stoudamire’s case, to land a guy with eye and knee issues who’s a career non-defender.
Roy’s exactly right about Perkins: He’s finally one of Ainge’s kids who’s worthy of all the hyperbole. The ONLY way I’d like this deal is if Ainge has some evidence that the Clippers aren’t going to take Griffin. Beyond that, Ainge is nuts.
by CoachBo on Jun 16, 2009 7:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
seems logical though
I don’t see trading away our starting center for a high draft pick when we’re good enough to win a title as a great move on it’s own, unless Ainge is planning on going with McDyess/KG/Paul/Ray/Rondo. We’d still need to get a backup big and wing and pg. I’d rather stand pat and build the bench though.
by BballTim on Jun 16, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This doesn't make sense for Memphis
as someone already stated they have a good upcoming center in Marc Gasol. Their biggest need is a PF. Maybe they think highly of BBD after averaging 16 and 6 for the playoffs and maybe Ainge thinks he can’t sign him to a reasonable contract. I wouldn’t be surprised if Ainge is really pushing BBD and maybe some of our expiring deals for the #2 pick.
by JBcat on Jun 16, 2009 7:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That can't happen...
BBD is a free agent. You can’t complete — or even discuss — a sign-and-trade until after the draft.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 16, 2009 7:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Slightly off-topic
But dang, 80 comments in a few hours.
Shouldn´t some of you get some sleep?
by Casperian on Jun 16, 2009 7:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As I said before
Too many possibilities to figure out what is really going on.
However, I don´t know if I like this scenario.
Perk and Rondo are all about defense, Amare and Barbosa not so much.
Pass ( I guess).
by Casperian on Jun 16, 2009 7:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, Perkins anyway.
The Phoenix scenario in this thread does not improve our ballclub. I, too, will happily pass.
by CoachBo on Jun 16, 2009 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the phoenix scenario
mine, at least, was more of a plan to salvage the team after trading away Perk for nothing (for this year).
by BballTim on Jun 16, 2009 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we need perk's bulk vs howard and prolly shaq with the cavs
he is the reason we got it to 7 vs orlando
by celticinorlando on Jun 16, 2009 7:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep.
I don’t see why you’d take an obvious weapon like Perk, and try to move him for a rookie. Seriously, I think Rondo is more replaceable than Perk is.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 16, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
First of all, after that Orlando series, when he was seen defending Howard on national TV, Perk’s value is at its highest.
Second, the guy has is having an injury on the same shoulder at least once a season for three seasons now.
Third, if you trade Rondo this means you gotta pick Rubio with the 2. However, Rubio probably won’t even be ready to help before the Big 3 retires — his buyout this season is prohibitive, and the guy is 19 years old, and rail thin. Not to mention his hand injury still isn’t completely healed.
by kozlodoev on Jun 16, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A good big man is hard to find. No way this is true. More flak in the air.
by johnnymost on Jun 16, 2009 8:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm Sure Memphis Rejected It
If Ainge in fact offered Perkins and Walker. For one thing, Perkins isn’t that much better than Marc Gasol.
by Brickowski on Jun 16, 2009 9:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As of now, Gasol can't guard most of the people on this board,
much less NBA players.
That may change eventually, but at the moment, I think there’s quite a bit more to like about Perk.
-sw
"I didn't go there with the intentions of getting ejected. I went there with the intentions of just telling Kobe, 'You got to relax. You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?'" -Ron Artest, 05.06.09
by Steve Weinman on Jun 17, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't we have to take something back to match salaries?
Or would there be a trade exception involved?
by rickyfan3.0... on Jun 16, 2009 9:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
not perk!!
No no no – not perk. He’s a big factor of the celts-Lineup – a big tower, strong and continues to grow in his abilities – he is like Rondo a huge part of the Celtics today and without him or lesser heavy guy like him – we would press K.G. in a big trouble position guarding guys like Howard, Bynum or Oden!! That can’t be a seriosly rumour :-[
I asked god and he said: L.A. will lose again next year!! ^_°
by greenmech on Jun 16, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
PAY ATTENTION
The only reason KG finally agreed to come to Boston was he had a chance at winning a tittle. If you take that chance away like tradeing away Perk (for team long term reasons) you kill his desire to be here. You are assumeing KG’s personal goals are the Celtics goals. The turth is he is only interested in winning championships "NOW’. He did not care about the moneybeing offered here…..he has to be worth at least 50Mil. cash and that does not include the games or shoe deals. Nothing works without KG. Let’s say we trade Perk and what ever deal that’s made is going to take another year or two for the team to get better. Would you be willing to throw away the last few years of your athletic life for that dumg idea.
It’s not necessary to trade Perkins. Two years ago we had a franchise that no one wanted to come and play for, but now people are ready to dump Perk, Rundo, Ray just for some chance that the team chemistry would work.
by tyquinton on Jun 16, 2009 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The shoulder!
Let’s assume the rumor was true ….and of course it probably isn’t…they almost never are.
If Perk’s shoulder is or can be made OK for the long run, I would NEVER trade him…but… if it is only going to stay the same at best and more likely continue to deteriorate TRADE HIM NOW while his value is the highest (his contract and playoff performances).
I’ve never had the opportunity to see Thabeet play, but the old , old comment is true…You can’t teach a guy to be 7’3"!
by Dipper on Jun 16, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Value – Who cares about money?? If you have the chance for a big deal and no replacement for him is on the market – I wouldn’t trade him. The chances to get him healthy over the summer are very good (he is still young!) and with him we re definitely the better team. He is one of the most underrated Center in this league and a big part of the effectiveness of our defense!!
I asked god and he said: L.A. will lose again next year!! ^_°
by greenmech on Jun 16, 2009 10:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, in Memphis’ view he wasn’t worth the #2 pick.
by Brickowski on Jun 16, 2009 11:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anytime you can trade a player that averages 8 points and 8 rebounds for the 2nd pick in the draft, you do it. Perkins is a good role player, but you should be able to get a great player at #2. Another option would be to package the pick to another team and get back a replacement for Perkins and another pick.
At the end of the day, I don’t see Memphis doing this, but if they did Ainge wouldn’t turn them down. It might hurt your chances for a ttile in 2010 but would make more sense lomg term.
by Ed_Ziti on Jun 16, 2009 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
what player?
it’s not the #2 pick, it’s the player you get with that pick and how he affects your team. so who do you want? my point: no one in the draft is going to have a more meaningful impact on the Cs championship aspirations next year than Perk.
by ssspence on Jun 16, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was a nuisance offer — Memphis was never going to accept it.
by Who on Jun 16, 2009 4:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll go for it, because I'm a Lakers fan
Danny Ainge may in no way be serious about this. There is absolutely no reason for him to try to throw away a good thing he has going (a possible dynasty???) just to give him something to do. First off, did Mr. Ainge even watch the second round of the playoffs? Kendrick Perkins did a fantastic job of taking care of the Celtics’ biggest threat in Dwight Howard, and plus, the C’s will have The Big Ticket back next year! Although as I am a huge Lakers fan, I could not be any happier with this rumor. Danny Ainge, go ahead, trade away Perkins for a 2nd overall pick, that just makes the Lakers chances against you for the next three to five years or possibly more, a whole lot better.
OG_03
by OG_03 on Jun 16, 2009 5:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't think they pick Thabeet if they trade Perk for the pick
I think if they make this move they end up signing one of the Pistons Centers as a free agent and Ainge picks the shooting guard Evans that he has coveted. Not a terrible idea. Rasheed or McDyess could play our Center position well. Rasheed has owned Dwight Howard over the years. I don’t know how you trade someone like Perk who has worked harder than anyone to be where he is at. But it is an intriging idea.
by swoonunit2 on Jun 17, 2009 3:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
rumor ferk and walker for#2 pick!!!
perk is a warroir and he fits this defense and i like to see if walker is a n.b.a. type player so i would say no to that rumor unless we can get somebody that can help us now then it makes no sense …..
by lohaus#54 on Jun 19, 2009 7:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
house money !!!!
ilove eddie and so does boston and i think he is comfortable there but it is a buisness i would love the celtics to bring him back but are they willing to give him 3 mill or more ???
by lohaus#54 on Jun 19, 2009 7:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs























