CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

On Tuesday’s edition of Comcast SportsNet’s Sports Tonight, ESPN Radio’s Ryen Russillo and Sports Illustrated’s Chris Mannix shed light on the Rajon Rondo trade rumors. Both pointed to same reason for Rondo’s inclusion in offseason talks: Money.

Russillo: Yeah I think there’s a bigger chance that they’d move him than maybe Boston fans would think. I think when it was originally rumored, whatever that Phoenix deal was with Amar’e Stoudemire, I heard a lot of people say oh the Celtics would never trade Rondo. But based on what I’ve heard the last couple days, I don’t think that’s true. Look, I don’t think they’re trying to move him, but I think they’re trying to throw some pieces around and let basketball people know that they’d move some of these guys to avoid maybe having to pay Rondo all the money they’ll have to pay and then pair him with guys that are going to be two years older than they are right now.

Mannix: Well they don’t like his contract demands first of all. Rondo’s not the kind of guy who’s going to take a hometown discount to stay in Boston. He’s going to sign with whoever offers him the most dollars at the end of his contract, whenever it’s up. He’s going to be a guy who’s going to go out there and try to get the most money.

5 months ago Hoosiers-dvdcover_tiny Roy_Hobbs 83 comments 1 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Confucius say...

Money is a terrible master…but a wonderful servant.

by charlie chan on Jun 16, 2009 8:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rondo

Still, he isn’t a free agent for two years. They have this year, then the qualifying offer, then they still have his Bird rights. Let him stick around, win another title, and then they can evaluate things next year. This seems to be another case of Danny having itchy trigger finger. There’s absolutely no need to rush him. If anything, a year from now they’ll have a better gauge on how much he should get and how good he’ll be. Even more importantly, if they win #18 next year and want to trade him, his value will be at an all time high.

by Jon on Jun 16, 2009 8:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He's a restricted free agent next season...

The Celtics could match any offer sheet to him, but he’s in line for a big raise.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 16, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Still

I don’t think he necessarily gets a max deal on the FA market. Plus, I don’t think it’s outrageous to pay him some decent money. He’s proven he can play on a winner, which is more than a lot of players being talked about in trade conversations can say.

by Jon on Jun 16, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A nice raise is fine for Rondo. $8 large is a nice raise.

If he wants more, then management is doing the right thing, IMHO.

by CoachBo on Jun 16, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Rondo

Hey Jon

You make perfect sense. There is no rush to sign Rondo to an extension. If he and his agent want a max deal,. great … EARN IT!!!!! He needs to shoot better from the field and from the line. He needs to play better defense. He has the tools to shut down other PG, but has a habit of going for the steal and letting his man penetrate.

I’m not dissing Rondo, just stating the obvious. He played very well for us, but right now he is not worth a Max Contract – a 6 yrs deal worth 8-9M per year seems about right.

Like I said, if he wants a bigger deal then he needs to improve a lot.

We have nothing to lose by waiting if he and his agent don’t want to negotiate. But he might want to look at Ben Gordon who turned down either a 50 or 60M contract that would have kicked in 2 years ago. He won’t make that much on this contract and he has lost those 2 years at the higher amount. And maybe he should consider the security of a deal this year offers him. He plays a very wild., aggreesive game and an injury could kill his big deal. See Leon Powe.

Lastly, lets say that he does improve and can find a team to give him the max deal possible, it will still be much less that the Celts can offer using his Bird rights. So if he really wants the max he still needs to deal with us and we either sign him oursleves or do a sign and trade so that he can get a real Mwx Deal.

by badax33 on Jun 16, 2009 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Max deal?

I don’t think the Celtics can offer a max contract, can they? With the cap being lowered and having Pierce and KG on the books, if they offered a max contract to Rondo, they would pretty much have to make up the remaining 9-12 players out of the MLE, LLE and veteran minimum players… and would still be likely luxury tax payers. It just can’t happen.

by funkstarrdeluxe on Jun 17, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's possible..

Teams can go over the salary cap to retain their own players, particularly those they have Bird rights to. So, there’s no reason they couldn’t pay Rondo any amount they wanted, up to the maximum. They’d be able to fill out their roster with the exceptions you named, as well as via Bird rights, early-Bird rights, trades, and the draft.

It will certainly be expensive, but no more expensive than the team has paid the past two years.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey Roy,
How reliable are these “experts?” I don’t put it past the ESPN dudes to sow the seeds of dischord, no idea about Mannix. Fortunately I’m sceptical, otherwise I’d be hyperventilating.

by Thruthelookingglass on Jun 16, 2009 8:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't know how plugged in they are...

I think Mannix is a good writer / reporter, but I’m not sure how much inside info that he’s privy to.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 16, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Russillo is reliable

he doesn’t report rumors all that often but he seems to have good sources from what I remember

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 16, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I would take Ryan pretty seriously, frankly.

by CoachBo on Jun 16, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he stated it very fairly too
Look, I don’t think they’re trying to move him, but I think they’re trying to throw some pieces around and let basketball people know that they’d move some of these guys to avoid maybe having to pay Rondo all the money they’ll have to pay

sounds very logical

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 16, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, logical if not troubling – for no other reason than we don’t really know what the options would be.

by CoachBo on Jun 16, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

we don't know a lot

what is his agent asking for?
what is his value around the league?
what is Danny offering?
what is Danny after?
what offers does he have already lined up as contingency plans or follow up moves if something goes through?

it is enough to make you go batty if you let it

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 16, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly. There’s so much swirling – and I’m sure 90 percent of it isn’t legit – that it’s becoming hard to follow.

by CoachBo on Jun 16, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is

old news for us Celtics bloggers. lol

by JBcat on Jun 16, 2009 8:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's a link to a brief recap of the rest of the interview...

… from the forums:

http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=29055.0;topicseen

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 16, 2009 9:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

rondo might want the farm but ownership has the deed. and ownership has seen how the krafts run the pats when it comes to players and money. if this true about rondo, he becomes expendable when ownership wants things to happen.

by nazzbo on Jun 16, 2009 9:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's all about the Benjamins

If Rondo’s and Celts are far apart now, they need to sit down and see what kind of #s they can agree upon (ball park figure) if Rondo has little to no progression or if he has a breakout season shooting from the perimeter and FT line. If we can’t be in the same ball park now or the foreseeable future then really look at deals especially if there is a possibility of getting an Amare or Chris Paul or Bosh – pull the trigger.

We won’t have 3 prime time Hall of Famers to surround Rondo making $60M in the future. Chris Paul is dynamite for the next decade. I am very cautious and would trade Rondo before giving him max money with that outside shot. We get zip if he walks this year. Either get on the same page and make the deal happen or look at other options. L.A. won it with Fisher, and the Magic were there with Ahlston. We can win the finals without Rondo if he plays hard to get.

by brianceltfan on Jun 16, 2009 10:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Pure Speculation

I watched the segment in question and it was pure speculation, especially from Mannix. I think Russillo had it right: they might like to ‘avoid’ paying Rondo all that money, if a good deal can be found.

Regardless, Cs should do the Rondo extension this summer. Anywhere between 8 and 11 million per year over the length of the contract is fair market value.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Jun 16, 2009 10:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

uhhhhhh

What’s the going rate for a top 5 point guard in the NBA? Sounds like a max contract to me, or close to it. Pay him, IMO. Letting this kid go because of a few million would be the stupidest mistake the Celtics could make for their future.

by dobbs on Jun 17, 2009 12:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If you can't get Rondo to agree on #s now, must move him- no brainer

If Rondo wants the greenest of pastures money wise and there are teams willing to pay that now for his potential- pull the trigger if we can get high quality in return. If he has the break out shooting and we won’t pay him next summer, he walks. If his outside shot continues to remind you of the Bagel man, than there will be less willingness to pay for his “potential” and ideally less value to the Celts if that shot still isn’t coming around after 4 years.

This are hard economic times and teams out there willing to give value if it saves on long term salary commitments. Other teams trying to position themselves for next summer’s free agency sweepstakes. There are deals to be done if Danny wants to wheel and deal. But the time to pull a smaller scale KG type dealing can be made this summer. It can’t be made next year when Rondo signs with another team and we don’t match the terms like we apparently aren’t matching them now.

My calls to sign Posey last summer fell on deaf ears. We can get #18 without Rondo. If he’s committed to the Celts, sit down and get something done in the $8-$10M range for 3 years with a team or player option for #4. If Celts don’t think he’s worth close to $10M then trade him to a team that will give us the value of a $10M future guy. If Rondo thinks $8-10M is an insult, than I trade him now rather than let him walk next season.

My understanding is the max contract for Rondo is $13.7M for a 3 year player. Too rich for my blood when your shooting 63% FT and horrific jumpers. Team X thinks he’s worth it, adios Rondo. Pay me now though because he’s a freebie next year if we don’t cash in on the kid now.

by brianceltfan on Jun 17, 2009 1:15 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree. I’m not interested in getting close to the max figure, given the current state of Rondo’s game, effort and coachability.

by CoachBo on Jun 17, 2009 7:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's see...

Rondo averages: 17pts 9.8ast 9.7reb 2.5steals and sports a 3.63 assist/turnover ratio in the playoffs .

He’s better than all but three PGs in basketball, and he is only 23.

Pay him his dues and enjoy watching him torment other teams.

by busterjonez on Jun 17, 2009 1:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That's the thing...

Should the Celtics focus on 14 playoff games, or his entire body of work? Rondo is good, but he’s never consistently played as well as he did in the first four or five games of the Chicago series. If he can show that level of play nearly every game, then yes, pay him his money.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Should the Celtics focus on a partial measure of the game – a triple-double – or his entire body of work?

You are exactly right, Roy. He needs to show Chicago-like consistency to EARN a max deal. Otherwise, something is going to need to give.

by CoachBo on Jun 17, 2009 7:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rondo's never played as consistently well as he did in the Chicago series

  But who has? If he played like that all the time we’d be talking about whether he was a top 3-4 players in the league, not whether he’s a top 5 pg. But when you say his entire body of work, keep in mind that very few people here would have been surprised if he’d made the all-star game, and a lot of the national press thought he might. He was also 2nd team all-defensive and a vital piece for us this year. It’s not like he came out of nowhere in the playoffs.

by BballTim on Jun 17, 2009 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t judge players – ever – on all-star game appearances or all-whatever teams. Rondo most certainly will get there, but he isn’t an all-star yet.

Frankly, he probably will become a max-contract PG at some point in the next three or four years because he’ll see – eventually – that he needs to round out his game. It’s pretty clear from the management comments in the media that he’s being pressured by the front office to do so.

My hope is that Grousbeck pays Rondo for value, earned, not on potential. It could take the Celtics payroll years to recover if he makes the latter mistake.

by CoachBo on Jun 17, 2009 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't really either

  I was just pointing out that his body of work isn’t bad. He’s one of the best PGs in the league and most of the other people in the conversation are older and more experienced than him. My point was that, while he should be judged on his entire body of work and not just the Chicago series, his entire body of work isn’t exactly chopped liver. For the record I’ve never said that Rondo should get a max contract, but by the same token Wyc can’t really go to a young player who’s improving by leaps and bounds and say “we’re going to pay you over the next 4-5 years based on where your game is today and not at all on potential”.

by BballTim on Jun 17, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His entire body of work is good...

… but not near-max-deal caliber. He’s still way too inconsistent with his scoring, and despite your arguments to the contrary, he was still the second least efficient shooter among all starting point guards last year. His defense comes and goes, as does his “speed” (as Doc likes to say). Once he brings his A game every night, and once he’s not a liability on the perimeter, the Celtics can start talking about a contract in the $11 – $13.5 million range. However, he’s not there yet.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again, I never said he was a max player

  And I didn’t argue that he wasn’t the 2nd least efficient jump shooter last year. I was disputing your assertion that his lower efg% last year than the year before was a sign that he was lazy or not interested in improving his game. And Doc did say that Rondo doesn’t always “play with speed” but he was talking about Rondo just reacting instead of thinking about what to do, something that will come with time.

  Rondo is, despite his shooting, one of the best pgs in the league, arguably top 5. How many other players in that group are as young as Rondo or have as little experience? How many of them haven’t improved significantly since they were in their 3rd year? What do you think the odds are of his not improving significantly?

by BballTim on Jun 17, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's what Doc said last week...
"Rondo still has a lot of growth ahead of him. As great as his numbers were, as great as he played at times, guys still fell off him to double team. Guys don’t fall off an All-Star to help with someone else. He has to make them pay for that by hitting his shot. Rondo has a chance to be a great player.

"But you have to do it every day in the playoffs. The first five games of the Chicago series Rondo played at an All-Star level. But the rest of the playoffs you could make the case that he really struggled. He had good rebounding numbers. He also had some good assist numbers at times. But at the point guard level you have to be able to score and get your assists. When teams play the Boston Celtics the one guy they are going to help off of is Rondo."

(hat tip to Celticshub for the reminder) At least in Doc’s mind, Rondo isn’t an all-star, and he’s not necessarily close to being an all-star. As such, perhaps it doesn’t make sense to pay him like one.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course...

… Doc sees the potential, as we all do. However, what Rondo is now is a flawed player who has a lot of hard work ahead of him.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doc was actively campaigning...

…for Rondo to make the All-Star team this past season. So, it’s important to keep these comments here coming after a tough series loss to ORL in perspective.

Certainly there was some disappointment coming from Doc in losing that series and the season ending.

Plus, without KG, new pressures (ie scoring, perimeter shooting) were placed on Rondo in this playoffs which wouldn’t ordinarily be asked of him with a healthy KG.

If KG’s healthy, Rondo’s ability to knock down open jumpers is much less important.

Would I like Rondo to be able to knock down those shots? Sure. and I think he will continue to work to do so, but I don’t see it as make or break for the team, and I don’t see it as make or break for him as a player.

He is a pure Point and his best skills as a player will always be the ones he already possesses.

by winsomme on Jun 17, 2009 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember, though...

… that we can’t rely upon Rondo always playing with the big three. People want to pay him like a star, and if he’s a star, I don’t think it makes much sense to say “he would do better if KG was here”.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, it depends..

…on what we’re actually talking about money-wise. If he wants max money, then I agree with you that he has a ways to go before that makes sense.

But I think he is already at a place where his skills have such a positive impact on a team that he is worth a pretty serious extension. probably in the “11 million per” range.

and it’s not so much that he would do better with KG as it is that he would be in his more natural role. a role that plays to his strengths.

every player has strengths and weaknesses (to different degrees). and if you play against their strengths, they have less success.

For instance, KG has never really become an elite low post player. how much better would he be if he had top-notch low post moves?

by winsomme on Jun 17, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I read what Doc said

  But I also heard him say on more than one occasion that Rondo was our most important player.I also seem to recall (without checking) before the all-star game Doc saying that Rondo would have a tough time getting named to the all-star team because it’s rare for a team to have 4 players on the all-star team.

by BballTim on Jun 17, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rondo is still learning

His D was atrocious during the Magic series. And his shot still needs work. Once he improves that he will have a look at a max contract. For now, he is worth 8-9 million per year, not a max contract

by greenwise on Jun 17, 2009 4:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It`s EASY to look good...

When you`re playing along side of THREE Hall of Famers!
But, that won`t always be the case for RR.

Despite that ugly jump-shot {it usually falls a full inch too short}…his horrible FT shooting {64%}…his inability to even get to the line {3 FT attempts per game}…his many drives in the lane that get blocked——-Rondo is looking for the same $13-$18M per year that D. Williams & CP3 will be getting in 2010-2013.

At best….he`s worth 1/2 that amount!

Danny sees a “fire-storm” on the horizon trying to sign RR…and would be wise to first try trade him to get another young “beast” for the front-court.

Believe it or not, Rondo actually CAN be replaced.

by Title 18 on Jun 17, 2009 6:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sure

he can be replaced, it just might take another 20 or 30 years to do it

I’ve been waiting too long for a top shelf point guard, I don’t want to play that game again

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 17, 2009 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

C`mon, Jeff

Rondo is no “once-in-a-generation” point guard.

Championships are won in the “paint”….the team that out-defends, out-rebounds, and out-scores their opponent in the paint wins every time!

by Title 18 on Jun 17, 2009 7:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I bet to differ

I haven’t seen a PG this good on the Celtics since DJ hung it up, which was about a generation ago (or at least most of my lifetime)

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 17, 2009 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s the question about that, Jeff: Is Rondo the best since DJ because of talent, or because of bad personnel decisions by management?

I have a very difficult time calling someone who’s a liability in the half-court offense a “once in a generation” point guard. And I am extremely troubled by the statement that’s been attributed to Rondo that he doesn’t need to improve his jumper because his game is getting to the cup.

That’s as far off base as a player can get.

I’ve got to see a bunch of things improve from Rondo before I’m willing to label him that kindly. I wouldn’t rush to trade him, but I’d certainly sit him down and tell him, “Want a max contract? Fill the holes in your game and we’ll talk next year.”

by CoachBo on Jun 17, 2009 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

liability?

that’s overstating it by a lot

he has a (correctable) flaw in his game

sometimes it works to lay off him and dare him to shoot, sometimes it doesn’t – that’s not a “liability”

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 17, 2009 8:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure I agree with that at all. His jump shot is a mess, and it frankly should be better by now. When a team beats you by daring him to shoot the basketball, you’ve got a significant problem.

Until the jump shot and the focus improve, I’m not al all interested in paying him more than $8 million a year.

by CoachBo on Jun 17, 2009 8:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

despite my article

I can see the value in letting him play another year and letting the market dictate his price

hopefully our questions about him will be answered by then (though it might cost us a few million more a year)

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 17, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah. That’s why the Celtics’ approach to an extension is smart. Jumpers can be rebuilt – if a player wants to. Effort and consistency are tougher to coach.

It’s good business for the club to wait a year to find out if its concerns are going to be addressed, or glossed over.

by CoachBo on Jun 17, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point--

whether he gets traded, resigns with the team in October, or sweats it out for the year, he’ll probably end up a better player for not being given the new contract right now. If it ratchets up his motivation to improve his J this summer it could help him become a complete player.

by clover on Jun 17, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Focus?

I still have yet to see a GOOD explanation by people who claim he has a lack of focus. Where are people getting this from? Because he showed up late for 2 games (1 in which is was physically ill)? Please. I heard Anthony Johnson is them ost “focused” PG in the league. Let’s have him replace Rondo.

by MrTripleDouble10 on Jun 17, 2009 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll agree with that

  He’s one of the best PGs in the game despite his (overblown on this board) flaws. It’s not a case of “if he improves his jumper he could be an all-star someday”, it’s a case of “he could be an all-star game in spite of his shooting”. He’s one of the few players that can dominate games without scoring. I think a lot of people who constantly harp on his flaws are going to be in for a surprise if he leaves. Hopefully I’m wrong.

by BballTim on Jun 17, 2009 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed — Rajon Rondo is already an All-Star caliber player.

by Who on Jun 17, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

better than DJ

Jeff,
having watched DJ’s time with the C’s intently, I’d take Rondo over him in a heartbeat. DJ was often left open just like Rondo and was dared to beat the other team with his shooting—just like Rondo.

Rondo’s a better ballhandler, penetrator, passer and rebounder. His shot’s even less reliable than DJ’s at this point but he gets to the rim much better.

The one significant advantage DJ would have is he was one of the most savvy guards I’ve ever seen play. That’s how DJ helped the team to 2 titles.

by slamtheking on Jun 17, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rondo gone?

I am starting to get the feeling that there is a chance Rondo might be leaving us? Booooooooooooooooy would we miss him when he’s gone.

We have one of the top 3 or 4 PGs in the game, he is still a baby and is probably the best pg we have had in 40 years. I would think we would be doing anything possible to keep him.

by rickyfan3.0... on Jun 17, 2009 7:32 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

"The Negotiation"

DA: What fan uprising? The Celtic Nation isn’t going to rise up in support of $13.7m a year. Dude, the guys on Celticsblog think your client deserves like $8m a year. Now get outta hear so I can talk turkey with McDyess’ rep.

by Thruthelookingglass on Jun 17, 2009 7:32 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I dont usually like to follow the blogs much in the offseason because for whatever reason it seems the fans get really hostile about trades and player movement, but I just wanted to put in two cents about the Rondo/Ray rumors.

I am a self admitted Rondo fangirl, and Ray’s a close second. But even ignoring that fact, ignoring the numbers and the %s and the wins/season…. RR is incredibly fun to watch on his ‘good days’ . And it’s incredibly fun to watch him and Ray ‘click’ together. I would be sad to lose that.

by illantari on Jun 17, 2009 8:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I can see now

Why contract negotiations sometimes create great animosity between players and management. A gifted player has been told all his life what a great skillset he has and how quickly he’s progressing as a player. Then when it comes to giving him money, all that talk turns to what he’s still missing and all the flaws in his game. That has to be tough to hear.

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 17, 2009 8:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Think how much worse it would be if we had an arbitration system...

… like in MLB. Then, we could potentially go through this with our young players several years in a row.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, as you’ve demonstrated, Roy, it’d be relatively simple to prevail in a Rondo arbitration. What prevailing would do to his attitude, however, si a different story.

by CoachBo on Jun 17, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

depends

depends what figures are proposed by both sides and what measurements are used.

If Rondo came in asking 11 and the C’s offered 7, Rondo would get it based on what other players are making and their performance.

Thankfully the NBA doesn’t have that system although what it currently has could use improvement.

by slamtheking on Jun 17, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and money creates animosity between fans and the players

it makes me sad to see how quickly fans can turn against players when it’s no longer just about the game.

by Pengaloo on Jun 17, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wait a year??

Will it be a disadvantage if we wait and next year find that Rondo still hasn’t improved and we need to look to move him. Will we be painted into a corner if he gets a big offer from someone else? It could be Ainge is under the gun to make that decision (pay the money or trade him) now. Maybe, maybe not. ??? Thoughts….

by celty86 on Jun 17, 2009 8:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Let's jump through the window before it closes

If his contract isn’t up for another year, let’s use the Big 3 window. We already have a championship with Rondo on the point and this past season if anything, Rondo was way better. If you saw the regular season, in almost every press conference after games, PP and Rivers talked about how it is Rondo who fuels their game. “As he moves, we move”. Especially after KG went down. The kid is 23, upgraded his game from last season to the point of averaging almost a triple-double in the playoffs. Right now maybe the flaws in his game are so big because his virtues have been so constant. Do you prefer to have a Devin Harris scoring by himself on every possession or a point guard who runs the floor, draws defenders like a magnet in the paint and dishes to the open man. When KG went down, how was the domination of the C’s against teams when Rondo was blowing them open with his speed vs the domination of the Nets when Devin Harris was shooting lights out? Remember his TO’s went down this season too. He needs a jumpshot? I need a raise. A jumpshot would be a welcome added value to a point guard who does everything else pretty darn good including a nasty knack for steals. Agreed, he does need to upgrade his FT’s and I think he should concentrate on that. Too much of a liability if teams foul him with no penalty while driving. He should complete his all-around game if he wants to attract the big contract but for now run the point and let’s win another championship with the Big 3, the priority should be to exploit this window while it’s still open. Get rid of Moore, Scal and Baby if he gets too greedy. Bring McDyess, Rasheed, Hill or the Birdman. The money should go there this year.

by fiorelladad on Jun 17, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Smart Move

Is to have Rondo play out his contract until he is a restricted free agent. With restricted free agents it often happens that players won’t get huge contract offers from other teams because there is a high likelihood the original team will match. So next year we sign Rondo to a qualifying offer, if someone offers him a max contract we match it. If we can’t come to an agreement then he signs a one year deal to become an unrestricted free agent the year after. By then he should be worth the max contract, that we will offer him. He will accept because he can make more money with us than with anyone else.

by Evantime34 on Jun 17, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The question is

  What if you could pay him $9M-$12M now as opposed to a max contract a year later (or losing him for nothing)? The “wait and see” approach has it’s risks also. What would you say his value is now compared to last summer? I’d say quite a bit higher. I’d expect it to rise again after next year.

by BballTim on Jun 17, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lot of good comments

Very interesting comments. I think there is no urgency. See next year whether he brings better shooting and as Hobbs said the Bulls series Rondo to the regular season. If he does, pay him. We should not expect a home town discount. With this economy, which WILL be around next season, $21 mil Starbury-type contracts are in the same wastebasket as Collateralized Debt Obligations.
I think the salary cap and luxury tax and all those other complicated salary issues are not player-owner neutral but actually favor the owners collectively. Danny has played his cards well and Danny worked hard to get a long term solution at point guard and he isn’t going to “fiddle & diddle” with it, as Johnny Most might have said

by Wildblu1 on Jun 17, 2009 9:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If the rumor is right it's kind of disturbing

  Rusillo said “I think they’re trying to throw some pieces around and let basketball people know that they’d move some of these guys to avoid maybe having to pay Rondo all the money they’ll have to pay and then pair him with guys that are going to be two years older than they are right now”. That seems to imply that, instead of somehow trying to reload on the fly they’re thinking of not just letting the big three stay but also shying away from big contracts that extend beyond KG’s deal. If we don’t strike it really rich with FA signings we could be in for a quick drop and a long rebuild.

by BballTim on Jun 17, 2009 9:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Man, break out the Pulitzer.

Great breaking news, comcast…we’ve only been saying this since the Orlando series.

Reporter: About a year ago I asked about the Celtics-Lakers thing and you said you'd really only seen it on TV. Now you've been through it, can you talk about playing the Boston Celtics for the NBA championship?
Kobe: It Sucks.

by indeedproceed on Jun 17, 2009 10:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Be realistic about Rondo

I love Rondo. He is a very good point guard and does things that really no one else in the league does. But, that said, he can’t shoot and is often a liability in the half court offense. Rondo for all of his virtues is not worth a max contract. Chris Paul and Deron Williams and maybe in a few years Derrick Rose are the only PGs worth that kind of money. If Rondo is asking for near max money, the Celtics should look at trading him. His value is at its height. He still has two years before he becomes a free agent. He is the kind of player that a franchise looking to dump a big name player can go sell to their fans. Let someone else overpay for Rondo.

by John70 on Jun 17, 2009 10:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rondo's A-A game...

(ie the kind of stats he put up in the CHI series) is a max deal…..but who really brings their A-A-game every night. It doesn’t really happen.

Plus, on this team, Rondo’s A-game is pretty deceptive. Rondo’s not going to score 20 PPG on a team with GPA. He shouldn’t be with three great scorers. So, does it mean that he is not bringing his A-game when when he’s not putting up lines of 20 PPG, 10+ REBs and 10+ ASSTs?

Frankly, I actually think Rondo IS bringing his A-game, and it shows not so much in his stat line, but how the team plays.

It’s very deceptive like that and would only be truly noticable when he’s not there. Partly it’s due to the fact that when GPA are on the floor, Rondo actually functions like a PG SHOULD function. And I think a lot of people here are trying to downgrade him because when he does that he doesn’t have the huge stat lines (eg CHI series)…

I agree with the people who have pointed out that we would be in for a rude awakening if we no longer had Rondo manning the point. They way he impacts a game with GPA out there woven fairly tightly into the fabric of our offense and defense and is very important IMO to the team’s success.

I just think he IS bringing his A-game, but it’s just going somewhat unrecognized at this point.

Personally, I think he is in the 10-12 million dollar range….I wonder what he’s asking for.

by winsomme on Jun 17, 2009 11:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think

Rondo is at the top of the second tier of point guards in the NBA. If he gets a better outside shot and wears high tops, then he’s in the top tier. Unfortunately, because Rondo exposes his body far too much, I fear he will get a serious injury sooner rather than later. He has to stop sacrificing his body on drives to the basket or it will come back to bite him.

by The Real Large James 2 on Jun 17, 2009 12:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Salaries

The top 5 point guard salaries in the NBA range from $12.5 to $21 million. Let’s say Rondo thinks he is worth at least Nash-type of money at a $12.5/year. Next year rolls around and you’ve got 6 or so teams with a LOT of cap space trying to land LeBron, Wade, Bosh, etc… Now they can’t all get LeBron, so there will be some teams with a lot of extra dough to offer to free agents. If Rondo plays hard and improves his value, one of those teams will offer him a deal the Celtics just can not match.

by funkstarrdeluxe on Jun 17, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They can match it...

The question is, will they?

I’m not too worried about next summer. Which team with money is going to sign Rondo? It won’t be the Cavs (Mo Williams, plus they want shooters in that offense), Nets (Harris), Heat (presumably, Wade), or Knicks (that system relies upon a point guard who can shoot). I just don’t think a lot of teams with money will be competing with us for Rondo’s services.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 17, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Roy

I’m sure they would want to match as not to lose the asset. But if they did how much flexibility will be lost? My concern with Rondo is that normally you wouldn’t think twice about moving him as in 3 years it will be him and Perkins as the key performers to lead this team. But this team in 3 or 4 years is going to need a primary scorer and as of right now it can’t be Rondo. Who will Rajon pass to in 3 or 4 years? That’s why I am worried that if he is the “main man” how good we will really be?

by celty86 on Jun 17, 2009 4:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

my bad..

I meant to say that normally you wouldn’t dare think about trading him… sorry.

by celty86 on Jun 17, 2009 8:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rondo is top 10 point but sorry too highly overrated

These playoffs Doc gave Rondo the keys to the bus and his case to shine sans KG. To a certain extent he did well. He puts up sick #s for rebounds/assists but those #s are highly overblown (more later).

Rondo shot 41% from the field these playoffs. Without KG to bail him out on offense and more pressure for him to take up the slack the shooting caught up to him, especially on the outside shot where he had ample open looks. As good as Rondo did offensively verse the Bulls, he couldn’t stay in front of a rookie point or stop his rookie conterpart. Rose scored 20 pts verse Rondo verse 17 reg. season, shot 49% verse Rondo in the playoffs, and also grabbed 6 boards a game- all improvements over his reg. season stats. And Rose shot the rock from the perimeter too with that 49%. We always seem to give Rondo a free pass on his rookie year, 2nd, 3rd, but here’s a rookie with a better all around game and potential that what Rondo has.

Of the 13 playoff games Rondo is just not consistent. For $10M+ the dude has to be able to be a second option on offense. Ray didn’t bring it, KG gone, Powe gone, this was Rondo’s moment. Too many games where he is totally unreliable. Half his games were:
4/17, 2/8, 2/12, 3/12, 7/18, 7/19 and that’s your second option that wants max money?

Rondo averaged about 10 boards/10 assists but even NBA announcers will tell you how overblown these stats can be. How many times does a guy like Shaq or D-12 get a great pass for a layup attempt but he gets fouled and sent to the line. These types of guards miss out on probably at least 4-5 or more assists because teams will foul rather than give up the dunk. A vast majority of these assists come from simple perimeter passes. Ray gets the pass off the screen, hits it. Eddie is alone, Rondo kicks it to him. The clock running out and KG hits an 18’. Joe Six Pack Point could easily on many nights grab 8 assists on simple perimeter passes that pad Rondo’s stats. Now, on the boards. Rondo got to play center field on Alston and he will get 3 or 4 tough boards a game. There are many times though when I see Rondo swoop in the lane when the opponent misses to grab the ball in front of Perk or Baby. There are many instances where there are 2 or 3 Celts around the ball for the board and it is usually Rondo that grabs it in front of one of our bigs.

This was Rondo’s shot to play straight up man to man D on a great rookie point and shut him down-didn’t happen. Rondo continued to try to do the reach around steals but there wasn’t the anchor of KG/Perk to bail him out.

Finally no surprise, Rondo shut a bummer 65% FT from the line which is piss poor for your PG. And then the 3-ball he was not a threat, but hoisted up 24, making 6 for 25%.
The worst of the worst is not all the stats but how opponents can let Rondo dribble the clock away as his man falls back in the lane clogging it up for Pierce to drive, etc. It is sometimes embarrassing to see how futile our offense is when it is packed in and we aren’t hitting the jumpers.

I’m sorry, but you put Rondo on a mediocre team and his assists go way down. Alston’s bad shooting allowed Rondo to roam and pick up boards. Fisher from the Lakers would have embarrassed him if he was giving the open looks like we got away with from Orlando. We have 3 hall of famers that can consistently bury open jumpers and one of the best bench subs hitting jumpers in Eddie. Even Baby assumed that outside shooting role.

In their own ways, Paul, Parker, Harris, D Williams, Nash, A. Miller, Westbrook, Ford, Bibby, Rose, Billups, Mo Williams, Kidd, Harris, bring enough of their game to be in the discussion with Rondo’s ability. I would not be surprised if Rose, Westbrook, Rubio type guys are considered superior to Rondo within a few more years if Rondo’s jumper continues to stagnate and he loses all the benefits he gets from having the Big 3 and defensive Perk anchor. Rondo’s swipe for the steal burned us time and time again in these playoffs. It will happen when he opts out or our Big 3 retire.

by brianceltfan on Jun 18, 2009 2:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Percentage of assists on close shots + dunks
Rondo averaged about 10 boards/10 assists but even NBA announcers will tell you how overblown these stats can be. How many times does a guy like Shaq or D-12 get a great pass for a layup attempt but he gets fouled and sent to the line. These types of guards miss out on probably at least 4-5 or more assists because teams will foul rather than give up the dunk. A vast majority of these assists come from simple perimeter passes. Ray gets the pass off the screen, hits it. Eddie is alone, Rondo kicks it to him. The clock running out and KG hits an 18’. Joe Six Pack Point could easily on many nights grab 8 assists on simple perimeter passes that pad Rondo’s stats.

(1) Steve Nash — 52.3%
(2) Chauncey Billups — 51.1% — surprising stat
(3) Rajon Rondo — 41.8%
(4) Deron Williams — 41.7%
(5) Chris Paul — 40%
(6) Jason Kidd — 35.2%
(7) Jose Calderon — 32% — not surprising

So 41.8% of Rondo’s assists result in either a short shot or a dunk. The rest are two point jump shots and three point jump shots.

by Who on Jun 18, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Three Point Jump Shots

(1) Rajon Rondo — 26.8%
(2) Chris Paul — 25.8%
(3) Chauncey Billups — 22.8%
(4) Deron Williams — 21.5%
(5) Jason Kidd — 21%
(6) Steve Nash — 20.8%

So Rondo’s assists come from the two most efficient areas of the court — interior shots and three pointers.

by Who on Jun 18, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

falling out in the making...

Ainge has already all but sealed the deal with rondo leaving.

a) Rondo did not seem happy at all about the Det rumor
b) rondo is in line for a big payday and the celts are already over the cap, i dont think they will be breaking the bank, when they know theyll be rebuilding sometime within the next 3 years.
c) Perhaps he’s overrated since he plays with 3 future hall of famers, and has been known for going missing in big moments, where opposing teams just leave him open.

by robi s on Jul 10, 2009 3:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Aging
Small
coaches are pathetic
Small
Doc, Start Doing Your Job!
Images_small
STOP HATING ON CELTICS
Shelden_small
WARNING! Spoiler alert!
Small
Brilliant Marketing
Small
The Lakers got the worst of the Artest-Ariza exchange
Small
atlanta is good
Ruby_7-08_hb_2yrs_old_002__2__small
What the Celtics are missing...an identity!!
Small
The Inconvenience of Eddie House

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small indeedproceed

300h_small Wide Load

Authors

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Small tenaciousT

Big_4_small jimmyt

Celtics_shirt_small Greg Payne