Mr. 58 is Lester Hudson
Lester Hudson is the pick. He was the Nation's leading scorer for a small school in a small conference so nobody knows how he'll do against top competition.
From the Celtics twitter page:
More on Hudson, he's an unorthodox combo guard with an NFL-type body...Hudson's stats: 27.5 PPG, 44.9% FG's, 7.9 RBS
Here's an article on him from back in February:
Three games into his UT-Martin career earlier this season, he became the first men's player in Division I history to record a quadruple-double with 25 points, 12 rebounds, 10 assists and 10 steals in a 116-74 win over Division II Central Baptist College.
But he's also showed greatness against the big boys, erupting for 36 points, nine rebounds and six assists against Vanderbilt, 35 points and 10 rebounds against Memphis and 27 points and 11 rebounds against Mississippi State.
Chad Ford's Analysis:
Draft Projection: Late first to early second
Positives:Big-time scorer Very quick Good athlete with good strength Amazing getting the ball to the basket A good shooter with NBA 3-point range Has a good feel for the game and can play the point guard position Excellent rebounder for his size An excellent pickpocket, among the nation's leaders in steals.
Negatives:
Turned 24 years old in August Has had very little exposure against top competition Turns the ball over a lot A bit of a tweener
Summary: His strong performances in 2007-08 against top teams like Memphis, Vanderbilt and Mississippi State had scouts wondering whether he can make the jump. The talent suggests yes. His age and a so-so performance at the Orlando pre-draft camp says no. Given his age, he's a likely second-rounder this season.
0 recs |
65 comments
|
Comments
Seems like a more athletic Eddie House
Not like we needed another young guard…
"It will be fun watching the Lakers get those balloons down one at a time." - Bill Russell
by silvershamrocker on Jun 26, 2009 12:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another?
Since Pruitt might be gone, JR is our only young guard left.
by guava_wrench on Jun 26, 2009 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WHy
Why and F-? Who did you want them to pick at 58?
by guava_wrench on Jun 26, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are right
Was not expecting much and I will be surprised if this guy ever makes an impact for the C’s.
by vinnie on Jun 26, 2009 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IN THE 50'S WE PICK
GOMES
BBD
POWE
NOW LESTER
IT’S ALL GOOD
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Jun 26, 2009 12:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
neither was powe
God bless and good night!
by BrickJames on Jun 26, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BBD was picked in the 30’s I think…..
by rondohondos on Jun 26, 2009 12:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well...
The odds of the 58th pick being anything were slim…but drafting a 5’9 scoring 2 guard out of the Ohio Valley Conference? We should have moved up 10 spots and grabbed Mills if we were going to take a guard.
by Scribbles on Jun 26, 2009 12:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No He's not 6'2
My bad he isn’t 5’9 his draft measurement bare feet was 5’11, so hes about 6 1/2 foot or so in shoes. Stupid pick imo, but what are you really going to get at 58
by Scribbles on Jun 26, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don’t have to sign the guy to a guaranteed contract. Why bother moving up? That would cost us something else.
by guava_wrench on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
totally agree scribbles
Mills was there, we could of had him. this is nuts from Danny,
Giddens v Hudson for a spot in the D league it is then. wow.
by mec1 on Jun 26, 2009 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C's Second Round Picks
BIg Baby was the 35th pick and Leon was the 49th pick.
by Mike-Dub on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i was hoping for danny to buy a pick but that didnt happen, i dont see how he can get an F though it doesnt really matter to me who he picked at 58 you cant expect much from the kid. If anything i think the pick is good because the guy is 24 so he should be as ready as ever to contribute but thats also what we heard about giddens and he didnt do anything so i dont expect much.
by adesilva on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why did we not Trade up to get Blair
Teams bought picks in front of us and we could have have had him. Mark my words we will regret it.
by Evantime34 on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe because Danny isn’t looking spend money to fill up roster spots with young guys.
by guava_wrench on Jun 26, 2009 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, I don’t know why Danny even scouts outside the Big East.
But yeah, we do need a 6’5" low post guy who has had knee trouble. I think that was part of what Doc said the team needed.
by amenhotep04 on Jun 26, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blair is 19...
…and was the best rebounder in college last season. To steal a little bit from Bill Simmons – where else is a GM going to find a good rebounder for $1-$2 million per season?
Reggie Evans makes $5 million.
by Michael Anthony on Jun 26, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the pick
It takes a certain trait to score as much as he did against any competition. Plus his huge wingspan could make him a good defender if he shows any willingness.
I was hoping Jack Mcclinton would fall and be ehouse 2.0 but Hudson was the next best option. At least no more Turkish centers who average 3 points a game.
by BigRedDog42 on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I liked McClinton as well, but DraftExpress paints a decent picture of Hudson:
“NCAA Weekly Performers, 3/15/09
March 15, 2009
After an underwhelming showing at the NBA pre-draft camp last summer, Lester Hudson decided to return to school for his senior season, where he may as well have carbon copied his statline from the prior season. In analyzing the limited footage we have access to from Tennessee Martin, there are a few new observations to be had about the 24-year-old combo guard, but we’re mostly looking at the same player we extensively covered a year ago.
Hudson’s role for the Skyhawks is very much the same as it was last season, as the scoring guard spends time at both guard positions while carrying the burden of having to create a large amount of offense for his team, leading our entire database in percentage of team possessions used. It’s tough to evaluate Hudson’s true potential as a distributor given the role he’s forced to play, but he shows flashes of decent court vision, is not a selfish player, and shows nice prowess in drawing the defense and kicking the ball to the open man.
As a scorer, Hudson is still the same smooth shooter, capable of pulling up with a hand in his face and scoring from all areas of the court. As we highlighted last year, despite his high number of shots taken, he doesn’t force the issue very much in context.
If Hudson’s improved in any area this season, it’d have to be with his ball-handling, where he’s showing a better command of advanced moves and more creativity in getting open for shots. His 0.14 turnovers per possession is well above average, especially for a guard burdened with spending so much time with the ball in his hands. Hudson’s creativity extends to his lay-ups as well, where he shows very good body control and touch, frequently scoring on floaters, reverses, and other high difficulty shots.
Defensively, Hudson is as strong as ever, still ranking near the top of our database in steals, while also playing aggressive and effective man-to-man defense with his strong fundamental stance. As alluded to last year, his lateral quickness is a concern when projecting to the next level, and he’s even beat laterally on occasion against the low level of competition he plays against.
Given the competition level he plays against, the unorthodox role he plays in his team’s offense, and the struggles he faced earlier in the season against quality opponents, it may be hard for talent evaluators to come to strong conclusions about Hudson, and his showing at last year’s NBA pre-draft camp certainly doesn’t help his case. With the changes in the camp this year, Hudson won’t be able to show scouts what he’s capable of in an orthodox role in a 5-on-5 setting against high level competition unless he attends the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament, something he should be highly considering, as he needs every chance he can get to be seen by teams, since he’s no lock to be drafted at this point. "
by Rustjive on Jun 26, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Confused
I’m moonwalking in circles in my living room right now. I bet the celts bring Jeff Adrien in to try to catch on as a free agent
by Digs Humphrey on Jun 26, 2009 12:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Danny does it again!
It`s official…No more off-season moves necessary…LH gives us the 2009-10 crown!
by Title 18 on Jun 26, 2009 12:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
VON WAFER
can someone agree with me this guy could help the celts out?
by Digs Humphrey on Jun 26, 2009 12:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sure
I can agree. A lot of players could help the team out.
by guava_wrench on Jun 26, 2009 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
If Eddie opts out Wafer would be a very good addition.
by Michael Anthony on Jun 26, 2009 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good night all
it was fun
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Jun 26, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I dont see him making any sort of impact this season unless he shoots lights out during the summer league and preseason which i dont really expect. Im not sure he even makes the team to be honest im not sure how many roster spots we have filled but it may come down to pruitt or him if we dont have many roster spots come the end of free agency
by adesilva on Jun 26, 2009 12:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It Wasn't Fun
It was boring, in spite of Celticsblog’s efforts to liven it up.
So we pick a short 34 year old. Oh well, at least he can score.
And if we need a backup pg, I’m sure Sebastian Telfair can be had for a song.
by Brickowski on Jun 26, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He could turn out to be a good Eddie House replacement if House opts out this year or next year when he is a free agent but who knows. Im sure Danny atleast likes him or else he would have just got rid of the pick most likely because im sure someone would have given something for it even if it would be practically nothing. That Quadruple Double is interesting enough to atleast bring him to the summer league, he also had some good games against bigger teams which is good.
by adesilva on Jun 26, 2009 12:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
lets be realistic
he was the 58th pick and we have no actual plans for this guy
Ainge says the Celtics don’t know yet if he has a chance to play for the Celtics next season or be on the C’s Orlando Summer League team.
by Silhouette on Jun 26, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nothing has changed. There were only a few guys in this draft that would have had any chance of making it into the rotation.
by amenhotep04 on Jun 26, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why wouldnt he be on the summer league team? Those teams are filled with our young guys (pruitt/giddens/walker) our rookies and random free agents i dont see why he wouldnt be allowed to play during the summer league games. Summer league will be a great time to see if he is able to score against decent competition going against some of the top rookies as well as young nba players who are of much higher overall quality than the players he is used to playing against.
by adesilva on Jun 26, 2009 12:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Carter and Christmas
The Celtics could’ve done better, I had my eye on Josh Carter from A&M, and Christmas from Temple. I also like Mcneal and Matthews from Marquette more than Hudson.
Also if they are giving Lofton a look in the summer league they should think about Jerrells and Dugat from Baylor who can both shoot the 3 and are small Eddie House height as well. Maybe they’re thinking about letting Eddie go, I hope not.
by jackscompletelackofsurprise on Jun 26, 2009 12:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this guy is legit
What’s up with the criticism when you haven’t seen him play? If this guy was halfway decent in school…check that…if he had an sat of 500…he would’ve gone to a huge school and been a household name.
His offense is phenomenal. His defense is solid. I like him way more than McClinton.
by jdpapa3 on Jun 26, 2009 12:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hudson Pick
Of course the You Tube video makes him look like superman. His shots reminds me a lot of Vinny Johnson who used to bomb up shots.
The guy definetly has range like House and has it appears he has a better handle than House. Who we still don’t know if he has opted for the Player Option w/Celts.
I like the idea of Adrien being invited as he is tough enough to fill-in especially if BBD & LP aren’t on board.
by BigT1942 on Jun 26, 2009 12:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No Derrick Rose but not Eddie House either
I’ve seen Lester play in person on several occasions. He can fill it up, but he is a high volume shooter. He is the kind of guy you put in with 4 bruisers and say…if he misses…you guys get the rebound. I wouldn’t compare him to House…Hudson can get his own shot from off the dribble from any distance. Ask anybody who was at the game Hudson played against Memphis who the best player on the floor was…and no one would have said Derrick Rose.
by ??? on Jun 26, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also like the youtube video
I was actually thinking the youtube video made him look like an NBA player playing against a bunch of college players. Assuming we are talking about the same video?…the one showing highlights of his 35 points against eventual national runner up memphis and 36 against vanderbilt ???
by ??? on Jun 26, 2009 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Intriguing Pick
I’m a big fan of scorers who have toughness. 35 vs. last year’s Memphis team is nothing to sneeze at. That was a great defensive college team.
Am looking forward to watching this guy and given Danny’s track record in the 2nd round, I wouldn’t so easily dismiss him. He definitely reminds me of Vinny Johnson with his shot.
by Kuberski33 on Jun 26, 2009 12:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Im actually really surprised Adrien didnt get drafted by the Celts just because everyone saw him as Leon version 2. To be honest i expected him to go around 40 but never saw him go. I dont know why teams wouldnt give him a chance hes never going to be a starter but he can be a great guy off the bench just like powe and if we lose baby he could be very valuable to us as well. Bring him in for the summer league!!
by adesilva on Jun 26, 2009 12:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Adrien will be in someone’s camp, maybe even the C’s, but guys like him very rarely make it in the NBA. Toughness is a nice trait, but need to have the talent to go along with it.
by Kuberski33 on Jun 26, 2009 1:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No big deal but...
Stephen Curry led the nation in scoring
by SayHello2MyRaefLaFrentz on Jun 26, 2009 1:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He looks like a Supersized Nate,
I was thinking that while I watched him. He moves like Nate but bigger and stronger.
by liamail on Jun 26, 2009 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, at least DA did pick someone. Looks like this guy can put points on the board, but there is no mentioning of his defense. And one of his weaknesses listed is Turn Over — something the Celtics already has more than enough.
by wincelticswin on Jun 26, 2009 2:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
His D isn’t great. He plays passing lanes and goes for steals…kind of like the game he had 10 steals as part of his quadruple double…If you are looking at him as a replacement for Eddie House…he can guard anyone House can guard, and he doesn’t move like he has cinder blocks tied to his feet.
by ??? on Jun 26, 2009 3:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So what's the over/under
Of “minutes he’ll play less than Bill Walker last year”?
Seriously, we keep drafting this type, and then we don’t see them for a year or two. Don’t think M. Hudson’s going to see much parquet for a while.
by illantari on Jun 26, 2009 3:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It seems like a good pick.
Welcome to the Celtics nation, Lester!
by Drucci on Jun 26, 2009 6:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it’s all about free agency and/or trades. what did you expect?this kid is a longshot but from his bio, it sounds like his whole life is a long shot. you never know.
by nazzbo on Jun 26, 2009 6:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mo Lester, Mo Lester, Mo Lester!!! Wait, that didn’t sound right. Anyway, welcome to the C’s kid. Good luck. Who knows, good defense and 3-pt range might get him some palying tiome eventuially.
by MisterT on Jun 26, 2009 7:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mr. 58
Anybody you pick at 58 is going to have major flaws or question marks in their game. At least this guy also has a possible upside. Seems worth the risk.
by Sophomore on Jun 26, 2009 8:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
getting Lester Hudson was pure good fortune for the C’s
This was an oversight by all those teams that passed on him, this guy can score with the best of them. He’s not only quick but strong and has good leaping ability along with his inside, outside scoring talent. He plays defense and plays it very well, something like Tony Allen !
In fact he can be compared to Tony Allen with a much better shot from the perimeter.
Gabe Pruitt and the other young guys have a right to be concerned about their position with this selection. My opinion is that he makes the team and because of his play and potential someone is going to get traded possibly Giddens, Gabe Pruitt or perhaps they don’t resign Marbury !
He is the kind of player that will get better and better with time and when his confidence is up there will be little anyone could do to stop him especially in one on one situations.
Boston needed a player that could score and create his own shot that is the one thing they lack.
No one on the C’s is good at beating their man off the dribble outside of Rondo who can’t shoot better than my 15 year old niece !
I’m not sure if Marbury has the ability to consistently beat his man off the dribble anymore
But Hudson is a great choice.
by martin kenneth on Jun 26, 2009 9:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tough-minded, turnover-prone combo guard that hasn’t show a lot of recent improvement?
Sounds like a potential replacement for Tony Allen to me.
Put him in summer league, see if he can compete for a spot on the end of the bench. What percentage of players picked that late in the draft even end up making an NBA roster, much less ever becoming legitimate contributors? Expectations = nil.
by theBird on Jun 26, 2009 9:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
THIS GUY CAN PLAY!
I’ve been born and raised a Boston sports fan and currently live in the south now. I heard much hype surrounding Hudson and had to see what all the fuss was about. I’ve seen him play in person about 5 times. Here’s my synopsis. He handled Derrick Rose defensively better than any option we threw at him all year. Also Rose is considered one of the better on the ball defenders in the league and he couldn’t guard him in a phone booth that day. I’m not saying he’s the next Derrick Rose but, he’s not to be considered unproven. If I could compare him to a player on our current roster it would have to be Eddie House. He hits big shots and is a high energy and effort defender. Personally I like the pick.
by southbound celtic on Jun 26, 2009 9:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes!!!! someone else who has actually seen him play
yep. he did whatever he wanted that day. the game against vanderbilt was even better. i think his game most resembles Von Wafer. as far as those worried with the turnovers…there is something to be said for his team. no offense to those guys, but half of his turnovers were a result of the ball bouncing out of bounds after dislodging a teammate’s rec specs or breaking one of their fingers.
by ??? on Jun 28, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lucky pick?
What was it that Auerbach said he liked about Danny as the choice for GM? He said he liked the choice because Danny is “lucky.” I’m telling you, I have a feeling he (we) just may have gotten lucky again. And how else can you explain his past success in the second round?
by jurrasicearl on Jun 26, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I expected some mega project, not the second leading scorer in Division 1.
by jurrasicearl on Jun 26, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i say welcome aboard lester hudson. i really feel tony allen needs to go. i also think that ray allen wants to finish his career in boston. therefore he wants an extension. they need to restructure his current 1 year 20 million dollar deal to a 3-4 year 20 mill. not insulting him. he is worth it. but we need to improve the team. lets face the big three are getting old. we need some cap money. i also think that KG and Peirce both need to come down to about 10-12 mill each. if they did that then celts could give allen 10-12 mill as well and still have close to 20 million in free cap space. therefore they could sign big baby who is a free agent, give rondo his extension. and sign decent some free agent help.
by patriot masshole on Jun 26, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i liken him to rodney stuckey
may not develop like him but same type of background — broken past, settled on a small DI school but light it up in terms of scoring. he’s got a chance to develop into a scorer off the bench. must be kept on the wing though.
by Nick Fasulo on Jun 26, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs



























