CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Window Pain

I don't mean to state the obvious, but in case you hadn't noticed, time is running out.

When the Big 3 were formed like Voltron, we all knew the window was short.  The most optimistic talked about 4 to 5 years of elite basketball with a few declining years after that.  The most pessimistic were proved wrong in year one when Banner 17 was raised.   Reality, it seems, will fall somewhere in between.  We just aren't sure where.

We know how long they are under contract for.  Ray has one more year, Paul has two, and KG has three.  Of course it isn't that easy.  If it turns out that KG's issues are lingering or worse, career threatening, then he could go from being the Big Ticket to the Big Albatross.  No regrets of course, just looking ahead.

Ray has had 2 straight disappointing playoff runs, both of which were at least partially attributed to nagging injuries.  Shooting guards not named Reggie typically fall off a shelf around his age.  Pierce was clearly dragging and hurt as well.

It is clear that we can no longer count on a full season out of all three.  If it happens, great.  I'll consider it a bonus and a blessing, but I'm not counting on it.  That means we can't expect the starters to do the heavy lifting and hope that the bench steps up every 3rd game or so.

It would seem that Danny Ainge has some work to do.  If he plans to keep the Big Three together, he needs to put together the right kind of bench around them.  That means guys that can excel off the bench or fill in for months at a time in the starting lineup (with competent players to fill in the bench roles behind them).  Doc wants vets and Wyc has expressed willingness to pay for the right kinds of guys.  That would seem to be option number 1, but it isn't the only option.

By now you've probably heard the story where Danny urged Red to trade McHale while he still had value.  You can bet he's thought about potential Ray Allen trades more than any message board junkie and even contemplated what he could get for Paul and KG.  Doesn't mean he's going to do it, but it is his job to weigh the pros and cons of any such deal for years to come.

If he did trade Ray, you would have to assume it would be for some younger star that could extend the window for KG and Paul and make a bridge to the years when Rondo and hopefully Perkins are cornerstones.

Everyone wants to see Paul retire a Celtic, but if Pierce's game started to decline or if he got seriously hurt, I could see him shopped next year if it allowed us to reload once again.  Same with KG the next year.  But all that is a long way off.

Right now I'm still hoping for option 1: Building the bench with high quality vets gives Doc some he can trust with big minutes which gives the big three more rest and set us up for another Championship run or two.  Just don't wait too long, the window is closing.

0 recs  |  Comment 78 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from CelticsBlog

Daily Links  3/11

Mar 2010 by FLCeltsFan - 0 comments

Boston, We Have a Problem

Mar 2010 by Jimmy Toscano - 182 comments

Daily Links  3/10

Mar 2010 by FLCeltsFan - 1 comment

Perkins Re-Adjusting on the Fly

Mar 2010 by Greg Payne - 50 comments

Starting Five - 3/10

Mar 2010 by Jeff Clark - 7 comments

Comments

Display:

likeliest scenario

The likeliest scenario this offseason is FA pickups and moving our expiring deals (Scal and TA at least if not Pruitt, Giddens, Walker and possibly House—→I’d hate to see Walker or Giddens go without giving them a chance to see what they can do) for a better veteran on a longer contract to a team looking to clear long-term salary.

I think Danny keeps the big 3 together another 3 years at least, if not 4. I suspect he’ll let each of them expire and resign them at 1/2 of what they currently make. I don’t see them taking a bigger cut than that. If that’s what comes to pass, Danny might move Ray in that last year of that next contract to either get picks or younger players on longer deals. PP and KG will probably retire Celtics after those next contracts expire.

The only real turnover in the roster from the current starting 5 for the next 4 years or so will be the bench players (and maybe moving Ray/Paul to the bench at the end in favor of some younger winds that developed into starting-calibur players.)

by slamtheking on Jun 4, 2009 8:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It will be interesting...

Unless a truly great trade comes along that makes us as good or better this season, I don’t want to trade Ray. I’d rather sign vets to short-term deals, and then rebuild through free agency after Ray, Pierce, and KG retire. I’d hope to resign Ray to a cheaper, short-term deal after this year, as well.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 4, 2009 8:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, and I think that’s the most likely scenario. We’ve seen quite clearly the folly of trying to cheap-together a bench with vet minimums and suspects. The easiest alternative is to spend some money and move some kids for proven vets who provide in-game rest and backups for what would hopefully be short-term aches and pains.

by CoachBo on Jun 4, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ray Allen's a nice guy, but he's way over-valued here.

Strictly speaking in terms of salaries, for what the Celtics are paying Ray Allen, they could have, what?, James Posey, Mickael Pietrus, Marcin Gortat, and one or two others.

Yeah, I know, Allen’s had some big games for the Celtics, as in the Chicago series. But come on, his game comes and goes in the playoffs. I’d much rather have some long defenders who can consistently bring a first rate defensive game, than pin my hopes that Ray Allen’s touch will be on in the big next match up. I don’t want everything riding on whether or not he can outshoot the other team’s Ben Gordan.

Ray Allen is all class. But I don’t want him taking up so much of the payroll.

by no kidding on Jun 4, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, I think Ray Allen has become overvalued too.

I think his game has dropped off a lot over the past two years and that he’s no longer capable of consistently producing the performances he gave when in Seattle. I thought his inability to up his game more so in KG’s absence was telling.

by Who on Jun 4, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless a truly great trade comes along that makes us as good or better this season, I don’t want to trade Ray.

In a Ray Allen trade, I’m looking for somewhat comparable in the immediate future + better for the years beyond 2010.

by Who on Jun 4, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not

I want a player who isn’t going to diminish our chances to win this year. “Somewhat comparable” doesn’t meet that goal.

The fact is, our best chance to win a championship is now. Rebuilding for the future is great, but it’s very unlikely that as a result of that rebuilding, we end up in a better situation than we are at the present moment.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 4, 2009 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not looking for rebuilding. I’m looking for a trade that keeps the Championship window open for longer.

by Who on Jun 4, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But will a lesser player extend that window?

… and won’t adding a player who isn’t as good now weaken our chances at a championship this year?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 4, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Q: Will a lesser player extend that window?

A: Yes, I think so. They don’t need an All-NBA guy there. The team will still have KG and Pierce, with Rondo is coming into his own, and Perkins continues to make improvements. A player who is a notch or two below being an All-Star keeps that window open.

Q: Will it weaken the C’s chances at a Title next season?

A: Yes. I’m willing to make that sacrifice if it gives a better chance at the title over the next 2-to-4 seasons.

I’m unwilling to trade Ray if it takes the 2010 opportunity off the table …. but so long as Boston is still a legit contender and one of the top 2 or 3 frontrunners, then I’m comfortable with it.

by Who on Jun 4, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One or two steps below All-Star is exactly what Ray is capable of for the next 2-3 years, imo.

Our whole window of opportunity depends on KG, and isn´t something.that can be compensated with lesser players on another position. If KG can keep his level of play for the next 2-3 years, we´re a contender. If he can´t…

by Casperian on Jun 4, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on KG.

On what Ray is capable of for the next 2-3 years?

I’m not sure if I’m certain enough to say that about Ray. I already think he’s a notch or two below being an All-Star caliber player. Will he be able to keep up his present level of performance in two seasons time? three years time? Maybe … maybe not. I’m not sure.

by Who on Jun 4, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

man..

The guy just had one of his most statistically efficient seasons of his career…he needs frontcourt balance at this stage in his career so he isn’t trapped on the perimeter by an opponents defensive schemes…that’s what KG is for.

Ray Allen is still a great player, but if you make the entire offense about Ray and Paul attacking from the perimeter he is no longer going to be able to produce all star numbers against a quality defense scheming just to stop him.

You have KG, Pierce, and Ray together during the playoffs you get balanced, consistent production from each

by BillfromBoston on Jun 4, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I can't Agree More

I hate to say it but I do feel the big three will have problems sustaing high level play at a full 82 game season clip and go through another grueling playoff run. I think father time is catching up to these guys and Ainge is smart and he knows it. Now with that being said if he can somehow rebuild our bench that would be great I do appreciate loyalty and I would love to see Allen,PP,KG stay together for another run they deserve it. In my opinion Pierce in the playoffs did not look like the old Pierce. I don’t believe he can carry a team anymore.Don’t get me wrong he can still be good in spurts and have his big games but in the chicago and orlando series he just couldnt take the ball to the hoop effectively anymore.Its like he’s lost some lift in his legs. I think Ainge will heavily explore trading Allen. It only makes sense if the right player becomes available. They will not be able to take part in the FA frenzy in 2010 and teams this summer WILL look to shed money and free themselves up next summer. Celtics are playing for NOW they’re window is even smaller than thought so I really would not be suprised if Ray was moved.

by Petro03 on Jun 4, 2009 8:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Too much of Ray's value right now

is tied to his expiring contract. I’m afraid Danny would be crazy not to use it and Danny’s not crazy. Should make for an interesting summer.

by clover on Jun 4, 2009 8:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

remember

there’s always the option of trading at the deadline – when the value of his expiring deal goes up and the chances of him being bought out and coming back to the team would be higher

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 4, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with you...

we need to shore up our bench and hope that we’re healthy next year.I think we need more than a few solid vets though. I think we need a legit 6th man to come off our bench and give our second unit a boost scoring wise. The success of our defense hinges on KG. If he’s there we’re a very good defensive team; without him we’re a poor defensive team. To keep playing this year we needed to score points and that’s where we fell apart. When Orlando and Chicago double teamed Ray and Paul we had no one else to step up. Rondo played out of his mind against chicago but couldn’t keep it going against Orlando. We need a scorer off the bench who can go one on one. I used to think Ray was the ideal 6th man but unless he has something he hasn’t shown I don’t think he has the skills any longer to be a one on one player. Danny had the right idea last year when he went after Maggette- I think he would have filled the role very well but in the end I’m glad we didn’t get him. Ben Gordon comes to mind as a guy who would be instant O off the bench. If we could somehow land him and then add a big like Pachulia or Okur we would be looking pretty good. It’s going to be tough because the Pistons are clearing the decks so that they can throw big money at Gordon. The thing we have to offer though is a chance at a ring. Detroit is going to be rebuilding and it’s doubtful they’ll be in the hunt for a ring anytime soon. Hopefully Giddens or Walker turn into productive players. TOny Allen and Pruitt are gone if we can get rid of them and Moore is clearly gone as well. Marbury wants to start so absent a rondo trade I don’t see him on the team either. Scalo stays because the coaches love him.If we sign Leon that still leaves us with 4 roster spots to fill if we want to get to 15. Clearly there is going to be a lot of action this summer. Other guys who could help: Ariza, Birdman,Von Wafer

by Red2 on Jun 4, 2009 9:04 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Pull the trigger

I’d love to see Amare with Rondo. I think we’d be competitive for a long time to come. However – it’s just not possible to get a deal done like this without moving Ray.

I think Amare could battle dwight howard – who is the new force in the east. You need a big to win – which is what Kobe and Lebron have taught us over the past couple years.

If Ainge is confident everyone comes back healthy – we remain with the Big 3 and build around them, if he’s not – try to make a deal to keep us competitive.

by bob3698 on Jun 4, 2009 9:10 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

apparently you’ve never seen amare try to play defense. the guy couldn’t fight his way out of a wet paper bag. besides, we just watched kendrick perkins play dwight howard as well as anyone ever has … and that was without KG playing help defense!

by k96ps02 on Jun 4, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they trade Pierce...

I wouldn’t watch the Celtics for 3 months. I would be very disappointed that you would trade a star that has spent his entire career somewhere. That just doesn’t happen much anymore and it should.

by funkstarrdeluxe on Jun 4, 2009 9:15 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

pierce will retire a celtic

and statistically the best ever.

for his career he’s 3rd in points(18,603), 9th in rebounds(5,107), 7th in assists(3,184), 2nd in steals(1,265), 4th in blocks(530), 7th in FG made(6,096), 4th in FG attempted(13,760), 2nd in FT made(5,053), 2nd in FT attempted(6,330), 1st in 3’s made(1,358) and 1st in 3’s attempted(3,713)

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 4, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Far from the best ever...

Maybe cumulatively, maybe not. However, in reality — statistics and otherwise — Pierce was nowhere near the best ever Celtic.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 4, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree completely he’s not the best but if he remains a celtic he will be top 2 in almost every statistical category in team history (basically what i was getting at).

if he keeps around the same stats for the next 3 years( realistic if he remains a celtic) this will be were he stands:

 2nd in career points, 7th in rebounds, 4th in assists, 1st in steals, 5th in blocks(perkins will pass him), 1st in FT made, 1st in FT attempted, 1st in 3’s made, 1st in 3’s attempted, 3rd in FG made, 3rd in FG attempted. he will be 34 whent that season ends…..and he missed half a season in ’06.

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 4, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think that's best ever

But I agree its a tribute. Maybe something like Most Productive (meaning a combo of level of play and years played for the C’s.)

by Brendan on Jun 5, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ray

I always enjoy reading these articles, but in the 4th paragraph it states, “Ray has had two straight disappointing playoff runs.” I completely disagree with that statement! First off, we would not have won the Finals last year with out Ray (while Pierce got the MVP, Ray was clearly the best player in the finals), and we would not have made it out of Round 1 without Ray Allen this year. Yes, he struggled in the Magic series this year, but we would not have made it that far without him.

by twelve_twenty on Jun 4, 2009 9:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it was perhaps an overstatement

but he struggled last year for stretches, which really was a little disappointing

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 4, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

If Ray had “clearly” been the MVP he would have won MVP. He didn’t and the vote wasn’t close.
I love all of this revisionist history stuff.

by Jaycelt on Jun 4, 2009 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What was the vote?

I didn’t think they released stuff like that for the Finals MVP.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 4, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Ainge...

…goes bang bang bang 3 years in a row trading an aging huge contract for a young star. What if we could land Bosh, Eric Gordon, Lopez or something like that. Those names are just fictional basically but my point is we could keep this train rolling for a while…

by rickyfan3.0... on Jun 4, 2009 9:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not so fast

Danny’s Big 3 won it all in their first year. No one was really expecting the peak to come that fast. But that is a helluva complimentary Big 3 and the 1 and the 5 in the starting lineup improved more than expected.

This can be over-analyzed ad nauseum but it looks to me like we were one bad KG knee from being in the Finals again. Of course Pierce was worn down and Ray was out of rhythm – they had to carry more load.

The falloff in bench help was again not as bad as the bloviating here suggests if you look at the health factor. Leon went down. Big Baby needed to start thus we had to look down the bench for Mikki instead of look down the bench for Baby. Scal gave us good bench minutes and will next year. I thought he was done for this year so props to his guts. Eddie was Eddie.

If we stay healthy next year we can win it all. I do think Tony Allen needs to find another place to play than Boston (C’mon Oklahoma take your boy back) but I think Marbury will sign for cheap money and backup Rondo for the chance for a ring and he was playing well with Eddie toward the end and playing D as well. That could be an explosive 2 unit back court.

I think Walker, Pruiit and Giddens speculation gets more in focus after summer league. I dream of all three being keepers but one of three is likely and two of three will be great for our team and another Danny miracle

If they don’t bring Mikki back I would understand. But if they do I would grant that they see upside from him absorbing the Celtics style. That’s their call and they’’ll make the right call on that so chill out on Mikki.

Why all this agida about Ray’s expiring contract? A healthy Big 3 w Rondo and Perk (Think Perk isn’t emerging? He has been only playoff big to take Hoeward off his sweet spots) and the bench people we have now wins it all next year. His contract expires next year anyway and the original game plan contemplated that. Celts control re-signing him for lesser money ($5-6 mil) or not. If he is offered $10 mil somewhere else we have his $14 mil off the books.

by Wildblu1 on Jun 4, 2009 9:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

you assume a healthy Big 3

I don’t

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jun 4, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No healthy Big 3, no championship

A 29 year old Rasheed Wallace ain’t coming through that door. Think Joe Smith of the No-Factor Smiths as the type of talent “out there”. Trevor Ariza…assuming we can out-pay the Lakers. Not happening. Before this is over someone will suggest swapping Eddie for Tyron Lue to improve our ball-handling. I can feel it.
Your job is to stir up discussion but I can’t believe you believe much of what you say above. You’re an educated, deep into it Celtics fan. There are a lot of loyal bloggers on this site who I think have played too much fantasy league. Real world is different. Everybody doesn’t want the guys you don’t want anymore.

by Wildblu1 on Jun 4, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's Something To Be Said For Tradition

Celtic tradition is that loyalty is rewarded by loyalty. The 3 should retire as Celtics and as Jeff says we should start now, with the bench, to build around them. Their skills may decline, but they make up for it with smarts. We can’t use this year as an example. If KG wasn’t hurt, if we didn’t have all the other injuries we could still be playing. That can be true 3 years from now if we start building by looking at some players we bring in as future starters. Next year might be our chance to get a good one for the long haul.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Jun 4, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Smarts?

I’ll disagree with you on that point. Smart players wouldn’t play as sloppily as these guys play. Are they experienced—absolutely. Gutsy, willing to do whatever it takes to get a win—-absolutely. Smart? I wouldn’t concede that. Way too many turnovers by Ray and Pierce. Too much dribbling into traffic, getting their pockets picked while they have the ball and too many iffy/bad passes for wing players that have been around as long as they have.

They can make smart plays, sure. Smart enough to get off their shots—no doubt. But overall game intelligence, I’d rate them average.

Disagree? Think back only 2 years when we had all of that youth and almost everyone on this site complained about how this team needed smart, veteran players to eliminate the stupid mistakes we’d see in every game. I still see a lot of the same stupid mistakes being made every game with a team of veterans. Not so much on defense, particularly when KG’s playing and covers up many mistakes, but definitely on the offensive end.

by slamtheking on Jun 4, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree

Check the turnover rates of star players who have the offense run through them. They are all way up there. Are you saying they’re all dumb? Or is more along the lines that they have more opportunity to turn the ball over since defenses are constructed to stop them?
There is also a direct link between turnover rate and free throw rate, for the obvious reason. Unless you’re 7ft, if you get to the line a lot you also have a lot of turnovers.

by Jaycelt on Jun 4, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

watch the games

watch the games and tell me Ray and Pierce don’t make a lot of unforced turnovers or get their pockets picked off the dribble/drives. It would be one thing if they were playing continuous fast break basketball but a lot of these turnovers are occurring because they’re out of control with the ball or making reckless passes.

My point is that we had the same issues when we had young players and it was widely considered on this site that adding veterans would solve that. That issue hasn’t been solved and, not that I’m digging up the historical stats, it seems to have gotten worse in terms of turnovers per game.

The thing is, it’s not the younger players like Rondo, Perk, Powe or BBD that are making the bulk of the careless turnovers but the vets. I find that incredibly frustrating.

by slamtheking on Jun 5, 2009 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

More usage means more opportunity to fail

High touch guys like Ray and Paul will almost universally have high TO #s as well…it’s a natural result of having the ball in your hands a lot, getting double-teamed repeatedly, etc…and because they don’t have point guard skills, there going to have turnover problems from time to time.

But what really gets my goat is when fans start calling guys ‘dumb’ just because they make mistakes. Failure is apart of sports and life, and just because someone fails in a competitive arena (where someone’s failure is guaranteed) doesn’t mean they’re ‘dumb,’ it just means they didn’t succeed. And just because a fan can see what’s happening and see what should have happened, doesn’t give them the right to pass judgment on a player’s mental ability. Making those kind of judgment calls is what is really dumb, in my opinion.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Jun 5, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Basically, I think the Celts need to do whatever they can to win NEXT season. If we can trade Ray while improving those chances, so be it. If not, then we should keep him and let his contract expire and worry about the next year then.

by droopdog7 on Jun 4, 2009 10:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think

we should resign Ray after 2010 we may have to use a lot of his money to resign Rondo

by Celtic_24 on Jun 4, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

no impact on each other

signing Ray wouldn’t stop us from resigning Rondo. it would impact the monies toward the cap and the luxury tax but we could resign both. Ray for no more than 1/2 what he makes now and Rondo for 8-10 mill/year if he has a breakout year with a consistant 15-18 foot jumper.

Pierce would have to be talked into the same thing the following year as well as KG the year after that. Perk is coming up for a nice increase to the 8-10 mill/year range right after Rondo.

by slamtheking on Jun 4, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ray

ray had said either earlier this year or last year that he would resign for alot less money. it remains to be seen but i would love for him to resign for under $10m

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 4, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Problem

We knew going in that the window was 3-years.
Year three is coming up.
They’re fine.
However, if they trade #20, I think it’ll still be fine.
Because they’d trade him for, as you put it, ’some younger star that could extend the window for KG and Paul.
I trust Danny

Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk

by mcpu40 on Jun 4, 2009 11:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

camby

i want artest but i dont see how we can get him without a sign and trade.

camby however makes on $7.6m on a 1 yr deal. id be calling the clippers up if i was ainge. camby played for umass and probably wouldnt mind coming back.

we could offer tony allen, scalasaurous, pruiit and a pick.

i can see walker getting alot of playing time and im not sure on giddens. i think he’ll get his shot too.

we would then still have the MLE (about $5.5m) to sign someone and the bi-annual exception (about $1.8m) to sign someone. we would also be able to exceed the cap to resign are own players.

here’s a few FA’s that interest me:

josh childress®: tall at 6’8 and can shoot well could play both SG and SF

zaza pachulia: another big who can shoot to go with BBD

wally szczerbiak: i know been there done that but he’s very tall, 6’10 and can shoot. can also play SG and SF

linas leiza: can shoot the lights out and play SG/SF

antonio mcdyess: PF/C who can do it all

trevor ariza: defensive speacialist who’s offense is coming around, SG/SF. will the lakers let him go

jermaine oneal: PF/C, i know he’s injured alot but if we could somehow get him for the MLE it would be huge. camby and oneal as our backup PF and C!

marcin gortat: liked what i saw when he played us

grant hill: old but can still bring it. would he sign here for under 2 mill like he did in phoenix to chase a ring

bobby jackson: again old but can still bring it and he plays pretty good defence.

drew gooden

if we could somehow trade for camby and land 1 or 2 of the players id feel very, very confident about #18 next season

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 4, 2009 11:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

stupid

this is what it says on si.com right now:

Garnett guarantees ‘10 & ’11 titles
Kevin Garnett’s recovery from right knee surgery apparently is going well. Garnett expressed optimism in a recent conversation with team owner Wyc Grousbeck, who spoke yesterday at a corporate sponsorship event at the Boston Harbor Hotel. “I talked to [Garnett] and he guaranteed the championship in 2010 and in 2011,” Grousbeck said. “He was as fired up as he’s ever been.”

Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk

by mcpu40 on Jun 4, 2009 11:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Master Po,,,, Say it ain't So

Grasshopper found dead in Bangkok !!!

I believe Danny will make a major move before the season begins, he’s holding his cards close to his vest… as McHale you to say…. and Larry would say Danny cheated at cards……

So whatever Danny is telling us at the moment, just take it with a grain of salt that he is materminding something as we speak

by Ancient Red on Jun 4, 2009 11:42 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ancient Red it is so.......

Every journey that begins must also end….and it’s a sad day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCyJRXvPNRo

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Jun 4, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did DA just wake up and realize we are running out of time? Excuse me but he spent the last year acting like we had ten years and surrounding our starters with not nearly enough. I’ll give you that he seemed to get it LAST year. He clearly did. He understood NOTHING this year about the window. So now I am forced to hope he is back to the 2007-2008 Danny. I felt last summer like what he did wasn’t just bad but a disgrace. He sent the lead troops out there with almost no back up. It was a suicide mission. I can’t stand Wyc and all now acting like oh yeah we are going to do the right thing now. We had three year window and they THREW AWAY this year. There was no reason for it. Wyc’s pockets are deeper now? Huh

So now we contemplate trading Ray? Or one of the othjer guys who played themselves into the ground? PP and Ray were about 40% of the effort of a team that took Orlando to 7 games. I just hate this. Ray didn’t screw up, Danny did. DA is responsible the team is out of the playoffs. If we had Peitrus and Anderson wed have taken Orlando and taken Cle

If by some miracle Wyc and DA have rediscovered some significant fiber of competitiveness instead of worrying more about the money, Id hope they would add a GOOD center, a GOOD wing player who can shoort ad play d. and a Good back up guard who can also play d. Guys Like Anderson, Peitrus and D West all fit. How is DA gonna do it? No idea and I have waning faith that he can figure it out.

You know when we fell apart after 86 it was NOT RED’s fault for not trading the big three. Red drafted Bias and later Reggie. Red had it covered but had terrible luck and then the stars caareers were shorted by too many minutes with no bench.

Danny needs to learn from this

by wahz on Jun 4, 2009 11:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

NOT RED'S fault

As opposed to Danny’s “fault” that KG and Powe were out at the end of the season? As opposed to Danny’s “fault” that Scal was out with concussions for an extended time?

If you’re blaming Danny for not foretelling those situations, you should be blaming Red for not babysitting Bias after the draft to make sure he came into camp ready to go and for not having Reggie medically evaluated to find that heart condition. There was nothing from the prior season that you can point to that should have tipped Danny off that these injuries were destined to happen.

I wasn’t thrilled that Danny didn’t do better in the offseason either but this team could have won the title if healthy. This offseason, the onus is on him to shore up the bench to better withstand the possibility of injuries. He can’t say there’s no indication of potential pitfalls in the team’s overall health for next year——successful surgeries for everyone or not.

by slamtheking on Jun 5, 2009 8:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The grass is always greener.......

Chess Pieces they are not……and the variables that surround what you give up for what you get in return are many. This awareness of the variables and their consequences should be cause for great caution.

Breathe deep my friends……..and stay thirsty

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Jun 4, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Danny is obviously a shooter. He keeps on shooting, even if he misses sometimes.This last year, he came up short. But I think Danny will come up with a much better bench and keep the starting 5. I don’t think some people realize the intangibles that Ray Allen brings. It would be a terrible shame if we had to play against him in some very important games(playoffs).

by johnnymost on Jun 4, 2009 1:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Injuries

While I expect the Big 3, and some injuries, this year was an outlier.

The big man rotation was supposed to be Perk/BBD and KG/Powe, with Scal as the fifth big, and POB as a statue. BBD, KG, Powe, and Scal all missed time to injuries during the season (and maybe Perk.) By the second round – only BBD was really healthy. I think we were well positioned to weather one or two concurrent injuries, but losing a player like KG, and the other guys sporadically was too much. The bottom line is – if KG is out there is no title, no matter who is on the bench. (People act like POB was a top guy, he wasn’t he was the 6th big man on the team, and I guess some of the guys DA pursued were at least worried about ending up as fifth men behind Powe and BBD – e.g. Anderson.)

On the wings, I think we were a bit under staffed. The poo-poo platter of Scal for big 3s, Tony for quick 2/3s, and House for shooting suffered too many missed games to be counted on, but beyond that I don’t have great faith in doc to deploy his lineup tactically anyways – it was probably a bad decision. It’s hard to say what alternative there was – I think DA was right to drop out of the Posey sweepstakes when he did, and he offered all he could to Maggette.

I don’t see a problem with the Rondo/House combo at PG. House will never be an elite ball handler – but Rondo’s MPG should keep going up mitigating that risk.

In terms of planning of injuries, I disagree with the usage of moving the rotation bench guy to starter. I liked it better when Ray Allen was injure in 08 – Tony Allen started and Posey staying in his usual role. Or when KG was out, Scal started and Powe/BBD stayed in their roles. I think that aproach works better for the kind of 10 day injuries you are likely to see. If someone blows out an ACL it won’t work, but you can’t work around that kind of injury anyway.

by Brendan on Jun 4, 2009 1:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

oh man i gotta touch on this one

eddie house is the furthest thing from a PG as you can find. he turns the ball over almost every time he brings it up the court. in fact look at these numbers from eddie the last 5 seasons.
 ‘04-’05 for every 18.9 assists house had 6.9 turnovers

‘05-’06 for every 14.8 assists he had 7.6 turnovers

‘06-’07 for every 12.6 assists he had 5.1 turnovers

‘07-’08 for every 19.6 assists he had 9.8 turnovers

‘08-’09 for every 12.6 assists he had 7.5 turnovers.

and thats with him playing off the ball 90% of the time imagine how bad it would be if he was are full time backup PG

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 4, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its a question of terminology

When House is playing “PG” he is not bringing the ball out, he’s rotating the ball in the offense, or he’s shooting. I think you have to look at how the whole 5 man unit is doing not just his isolated stats in one category. (For example the benefit of his 3pt shooting on spacing.)

by Brendan on Jun 4, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes but house is playing SG more often then he’s playing PG and for that 1 reason, his shooting

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 4, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if he wasnt such a good shooter he wouldnt be in the league

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 4, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

House isn't an effective PG

House is good off the bench for shooting, not ballhandling. He does poorly against pressure and as the backup PG, that’s what he would see from other teams looking to get the advantage on the C’s. The series against the Pistons last year exposed that when they put in Lindsay Hunter when House came in. House was completely overmatched bringing it up the court. And that’s by a well-into-his-30’s Hunter, not a young guard with energy to spare.

by slamtheking on Jun 5, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big deal

that happened once in the playoffs, and that was the series the C’s on in 6 games. Check out the five man rotations on 82 games. The startes plus House were fine. Yes when house plays “Guard” he’s used as a shooter on O, but he guards the other teams “Point Guard.” The offense is run through Ray and Pierce. This is fine as long as the primary wing who backs up RA and PP is a good ball handler. This is why I favor pursuing Grant Hill (and the fact he’d likely take a small contract if he’ll come.)

A team with talented wings and big men who can pass has plenty of ways to get the ball over half court other than dribbling. It’s also good for the wings to get some “feature” time when Rondo is out – unused ball handling skills get rusty.

by Brendan on Jun 5, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ray is on the block

How could he not be with what Ainge has said in the past about how he would have dealed with the real big three?

Ray is in his last year. Big contract that is having lower returns on the floor as time is moving forward.

There is no loyalty in sports. Otherwise, Ray would still be a Buck and not on his third team.

Now would I be surprised if Ray stays? Not at all. I think Ainge only makes the deal if he thinks it helps the Celtics this year. (which is why I thought the rumored trade made no sense)

by Wide Load on Jun 4, 2009 1:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's pretty simple

If you can move Ray and maintain or increase the chances of winning now, do it!

 Pruit is no Ray Allen but he is capable of spacing the floor and hitting the three. I am not advocating that he can replace Ray but if we can keep the floor spaced and pick up an all star big man, well, I’m all for that. Then again, you may be able to do the same by picking up Rasheed and keeping Ray.

by Little D on Jun 4, 2009 2:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

comparing ray and pruitt is mind-boggling. the idea that the Cs could move ray to get a big man and pruitt could somehow compensate for the loss of ray is befuddling.

it’s not the same drop in talent, but it brings to mind when the bulls were forced to use pete myers in place of the (first-time) retired michael jordan.

picking up rasheed? the 12pt 7reb in 32min over 66 games rasheed? rasheed hasn’t averaged more than 13pts and 7rebs in the last 3 seasons. and he’s averaging a shade under 43% over the last 4 seasons. we need rasheed pre 2004-05, not 2009-10.

by k96ps02 on Jun 4, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who's comparing Ray and Pruit?

I’m not sure what you don’t understand. This is what I said.

 " Pruit is no Ray Allen but he is capable of spacing the floor and hitting the three"

" I am not advocating that he can replace Ray but if we can keep the floor spaced and pick up an all star big man "

My other point – If we can keep Ray and pick up Rasheed, well that should certainly help! I did not say Rasheed was an all star or the 2nd coming of Dwight Howard.

by Little D on Jun 4, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except

Pruitt is not a 3 pt threat.

As for Rasheed, getting those minutes down a bit further and getting him interested would likely make some of those stats a bit better.

by Brendan on Jun 5, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree

I believe Pruitt is.

by Little D on Jun 5, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

everyone should be expendable, tho every one should not go. ray is serviceable and works his tail off. moving more than anyone on the floor. pp is the occasional loafer. the 2 i would hate to lose are perk and rr because of their age. i would most like to see tony go and tho he was a mensch this year, scal.

by nazzbo on Jun 4, 2009 2:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

who switched the kool-aid?

i’m shocked. in the comments so far, ray has been described as serviceable, expendable, disappointing, 1-2 levels/steps below all-star caliber, and delivering diminishing returns on the floor.

ray was better this year than he was last year. i’m not suggesting that he’ll continue to get better with age, but there isn’t much statistical evidence to demonstrate that ray is declining at a rapid rate. i believe that ray is actually defying the statistical averages for players his age and at his position. the guy just dropped 51 in a playoff game (in 58 mins of play).

it seems like people are over-reacting to the Cs getting bounced out earlier than anticipated. why not dedicate the summer to looking for free agents, get the guys out on the floor, and see how it looks? if there are injuries and it looks like the team’s window is indeed closing, then i can understand shopping ray at the trade deadline. but now? it seems too reactionary to me.

by k96ps02 on Jun 4, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's about the money.

The big concern with Ray Allen is how much of the payroll he consumes, which then isn’t available to provide for a better bench.

I love Ray Allen. But he costs too much.

by no kidding on Jun 4, 2009 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is reactionary...

…welcome to Celtics nation

by BillfromBoston on Jun 4, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now that the finals are starting

I find myself bummed out all over again but our wasted year and missed opportunity. Honestly with a healthy KG and Leon we’re playing for a title right now. I also can’t help but reflect on the fact that Pierce and Allen never got it going together during the playoffs. Our stars had invidivudal moments of greatness but overall their performances were very inconsistent. Was it age or fatigue or both? Maybe it was injuries. SHould we though expect that they will be better next year when they’re a year older? Will KG hold up for an entire season? Heck, will Perkins hold up? Will Leon come back? Lots of questions- maybe too many for anyone to say with conviction that we will win it all again next year. But what’s the alternative? Trade Ray or Rondo or Paul and then what? You’d have other holes to fill and you’d stil;l have a bunch of unanswered questions. One thing I think we can all agree on about this team is that there is no quit in them ( at least there wasn’t until game 7 against the Magic). Also this team has good chemistry. That may not happen if you trade Ray and bring in other guys. I say let’s keep this core group together and give it another shot. If by the trading deadline next year we’re out of it or all banged up then you trade ray and start making plans to rebuild

by Red2 on Jun 4, 2009 4:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

One year does not a trend make...

If you look at the finish and ignore the variables then you’re just finding support for your own conclusions.

KG’s injury and the subsequent injuries that followed forced heavy minutes and an unbalanced offense onto the court – Glen Davis and Rondo became the 3rd option scorers on the team and there was no low post game or consistent defensive pressure brought by this tired, make-shift unit.

Expecting Ray Allen and Paul Pierce at this stage in their careers to carry a team to the finals was unrealistic – there are rarely any wing dominated teams that make it to the finals to begin with and these two are much more effective playing off of a dominant big man who draws double teams.

Losing KG changed the balance of the team and losing Powe decimated the frontcourt depth all together. The rest of the roster did fairly well, but Marbury’s inconsistent shooting forced Doc to use Ray and Paul more than he’d like. Earlier in the year both Ray and Paul played under 35 mpg while TA and Eddie House filled the guard minutes, allowing Ray to be Pierce’s backup.

If the team gets an effective F/C and backup PG with decent size to allow Eddie to defend 1’s but play 2 offensively the team will not face the fatigue issues that plagued them in the playoffs.

So much has been made about “depth” but the team was not playing heavy minutes during the first portion of the season – they needed a true PG to lead the 2nd unit, but they were managing minutes just fine.

KG’s injury was not predictable and his absence cost this team a shot at the title…there is no need to panic or read into things – the team needs are clear and the team nucleus is sound – the starting lineup is still the best in the NBA IMO.

Getting a McDyess or Rasheed to go along with a veteran PG via trade or, in Marbury’s case, FA signing will be more than enough to provide this team with the depth they need to compete.

If the team has the type of injuries it had this year, no amount of planning can circumvent that.

Whether or not the team pursues wing depth or guard depth will depend on availability, but i’d imagine the team will look for a PG first and allow the market and their own player development to determine the need for a wing.

by BillfromBoston on Jun 4, 2009 5:32 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

i agree with bill.

by k96ps02 on Jun 4, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mostly agree

except I think finding a backup PG with size and shot who will also be happy playing behind Rondo is easier said then done.

I think a SF wing with ball handling skills makes more sense if House is going to be part of the top 8. Otherwise a big Point guard will need to be able to handle the ball and shoot decently, since he’ll need to play next to House and Rondo (who needs the shooters to keep D’s honest.)

by Brendan on Jun 5, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This Draft

I hope Ainge is still looking to get a lottery talent in this draft. There are some good players in here that could bring more energy off the bench. I’d love to still see us get the #14 from Phoenix somehow. Johnny Flynn, Omri Casspi, Dejuan Blair, Ty Lawson, BJ Mullens- a lot of good possibilities to be had.

Ditch Powe, Walker, Scal, Tony Allen and Gabe Pruitt.

by Tradetime on Jun 4, 2009 5:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

in favor of?

ditch them in favor of what—an unproven draft pick from the middle of the 1st round in a crappy draft?

I don’t mind seeing TA/Scal/Pruitt being moved as tradebait for better bench depth but Powe produces on the court and there’s no need to ditch Walker. C’s can’t have 15 guys on the roster that are all ready to play 20 minutes a game. Having a few 1st/2nd year players under development (as in the 13th-15th players on the roster) should not hurt any championship run. If it does, it’s not a championship team.

by slamtheking on Jun 5, 2009 8:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can’t believe what I’m reading in the article and in the posts above. Talk about sport being a “what have you done for me lately” business . . .
Three of the greatest players of their generation come together under the jersey of one of sports most hallowed franchises and “unexpectedly” (why was it unexpected) win a title. The next year the centerpiece gets injured and the talk immediately turns to “the sky is falling, the sky is falling,” “Trade! Trade! Trade!”

This year, without Kevin Garnett (MVP, Defensive PoY) and without Leon Powe (a key reserve who was putting up big numbers after KG went down), the media and Celtics fans whined that the Celtics had no bench, that PP and Ray Allen were struggeling, that Rondo was inconsistent, that Perkins couldn’t guard Dwight Howard, that Marbury was a cancer, that Scal is a stiff, that Mikki Moore is the second coming of Mark Blount, and on and on, and yet the Celtics STILL managed to have two pulse thumping, seven game series. Despite all those obstacles they still had a post season most players would give their left testicle for and yet we sit and whine to break up the team and get younger.

This team is winning. It wasn’t whole and it was still winning! Yes, it could use a veteran or two off the bench to help. Yes, it could use a young gunning stud to come off the bench and be an explosive scorer/hustler/defender. But all this whinning about windows closing, and needing to trade off the players who helped last years fun ride away is . . . not just disturbing. It’s sad. Because it’s coming from people who profess to root for the these same players and this same team when they’re winning titles, but not when they struggle through injury and adversity.
No wonder so many pro athletes care less about the fans. We may pay their salary, but the moment they don’t live up to the lofty expectations we place on them, we readily abandon them and call for someone else to take their spots. Nice.

by tmcdon on Jun 4, 2009 7:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Very Well Said

And I totally agree. This team gave us everything they had. What more can we ask for.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Jun 4, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rebuild

I say we rebuild, I miss those old days. The draft isn’t very much fun anymore when you hold the 58th pick.

by Champzilla on Jun 4, 2009 9:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

draft

True, the draft is a lot more fun to watch and follow when you have the chance to get a good player that could help the following year but I don’t miss having to rely on that player to deliver quality playing time right away.

by slamtheking on Jun 5, 2009 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
what next!!!
Small
Understanding Rebounds and the Celtics
Small
To all the peeps who Booed
Celtic_pride_small
An Outright Disgrace!
Small
Rebounding, Rebounding, Rebounding!!
Small
Are we the fans, perhaps spoiled a bit?
Small
How can we Help?
Small
Good Bye Do-oc, Good Bye Do-oc!
Small
Please Help
Small
Should Perk And Davis Be Playing?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small indeedproceed

300h_small Wide Load

Celtics_shirt_small Greg Payne

Authors

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Small tenaciousT

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Small Fafnir