Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

[Jamario] Moon, we hear, wants to be in Boston.

almost 3 years ago Hoosiers-dvdcover_tiny Roy_Hobbs 64 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This is good news

by drod400 on Jul 15, 2009 2:04 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

sounds good to me...

…I definitely like that he wants to play here. It would be nice if we can work out a sign and trade so as to keep another roster spot open…

by winsomme on Jul 15, 2009 2:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Kinda irrelevant really. Miami holds all the cards. Though maybe Moon try to force Miami into a sign and trade situation, though I’d be very careful of what the Celtics would offer to him. I don’t see many packages that would really work in our favor.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 15, 2009 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Sign and Trade

How about a sign and trade for him with a team that is under the cap?

by Evantime34 on Jul 15, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

What does this mean?

Are you suggesting that the Celtics trade with a team other than Miami for a Miami restrictied free agent (Moon)?

by Cousin It on Jul 15, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

Can’t we sign him to an offer sheet that is above what we have left based on a conditional trade? From the tone of your post it sounds like that might not be accurate.

by Evantime34 on Jul 15, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doesn't work

A team can only sign-and-trade its own players. Only Miami could sign-and-trade Moon.

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

see my post about this....

i’ve posted a number of article concering the Heat’s situation at the 3, their tenuous position vis-a-vis the luxury tax, and their desire to keep as much 2009-2010 cap space as possible.

And Roy, gimme a little hat tip for the link!!!

by ssspence on Jul 15, 2009 2:16 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t see how they won’t match a 1.9 million offer… it might help them trade James Jones who is more expensive.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 15, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

see my note below

i agree, but the lux tax element and the likely reduced cap next year are bigger factors than i would have originally thought.

by ssspence on Jul 15, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, thanks for finding the link and the quote sspence.

And also thanks for finding Miami’s probable position about Moon, it really seems that they are going to let him walk so hopefully he will sign with us!

by Drucci on Jul 15, 2009 2:20 PM EDT reply actions  

it could all be conjecture

but with the reduced cap for next season every $$$ is going to count for them in their persuit of Bosh, and attendance has been an issue in Miami so the lux tax could be pretty painful for Micky….

by ssspence on Jul 15, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the LLE I hope.

Can dunk and shoot the 3 a little.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Jul 15, 2009 2:44 PM EDT reply actions  

I wonder...

what Miami’s qualifying off was to him. I would love to have him. However, we still need scoring. Here’s hoping we keep Baby.

by B-ball on Jul 15, 2009 3:00 PM EDT reply actions  

It's set by the CBA

Qualifying offers are set by the rookie contract scale.

Moon’s is $1M: http://hoopshype.com/salaries/miami.htm

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would LOVE moon

He’s a great fit, the best wing avaliable and would be a steal if we could get him for LLE. I’d be fine taking jones’s contract as well if needed.

by beantownboy171 on Jul 15, 2009 3:05 PM EDT reply actions  

You “would” take Jones’ contract? You must be kidding. He could be the 7th man on our team. If we get Moon and Jones, I would be going nuts! We’d be loaded on our bench.

by P2 on Jul 15, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its all about 2010 for them

I believe James Jones contract is partially guaranteed for 2010-2011 so it would save them roughly a million or so. Unless I got my facts wrong.

by beantownboy171 on Jul 15, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

How can we get Jones?

I’m going to start this off by saying that I could be completely wrong in how I am thinking these contracts work, so if I am, sorry. Jones’ salary for next year will be $4.3M with a team option for the next three years after that. In a sign and trade situation I assume the Heat would offer Moon the LLE which would be about 1.9M (the Heat offered Moon a qualifying offer of about 1M to make him a restricted FA, but I doubt that that Moon would sign for that when he could make 900K more). We have four expiring contracts: Ray Allen, Eddie, Scal, and TA: obviously the two that we would get rid of are Scal’s at about $3.4M and TA’s at $2.5M. When you add all of these up the two Heat players would add up to 6.2M and the two C’s would be 5.9M. We’re 300K off at this point. The only way we could make this work is if Moon takes less pay to come to the C’s which isn’t impossible as he apparently wants to be here, but it still looks to me as if it won’t work.

by peiff on Jul 15, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Salaries don't need to match exactly

They (basically) just need to be within 25%.

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

So this could work out

if the Heat would really pretty much ruin their chances of doing anything this season and solely focus on 2010?

by peiff on Jul 16, 2009 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Moon comes to Boston it address's the need for the 2/3 position.

I mentioned in an earlier post that we need the following:

We need someone who can fill in for the 2/3 positions; Ray Allen
and Paul Pierce;

someone 6’5 – 6’9"
can shoot 44-48% from the field
can shoot 35+% from 3pt range
averages 12-18 mins a game
4-5 rebounds
1 block per gm
1 steal per gm

Jamario Moon fits that description to a ‘T’. Take a look at his resume and where he’s been. This guy is seriously hungry to play in the NBA.

Since 2001 he’s played on 15 teams before the Toronto Raptors signed him in July 2007. He is a defensive presence at the 2/3, much needed improvement (i.e. – James Posey like abilities).

Moon holds the Raptors record for most consecutive games with at least 1 block (12 Games) and this is a team that had Bargani, Bosh, and Marion.

I like it, I would do it immediately.

Danny Ainge is brilliant to get this guy on board.

by OCsWestCeltic on Jul 15, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions  

moon would be good, baby would be better

I like Moon’s athletic nature. He can get out and run and finish well. Maybe Walker could be that person if he got some PT???
Baby has to be our 1st priority. As I have said before, you can’t consider our bench an upgrade if we lose Baby and Leon after signing Sheed. Add Marbury to that and out bench has taken a hit. Who else can we get out there that will do a better job than Baby has done for us? If we can get him for 2.5-3.5 mil, it should be a no-brainer. I would rather spend a little extra and get him vs the LLE and get a stiff. His production has been outstanding considering where he started and developing the jumper that he hits very well was a big boost to his game. I think we would be silly not to re-sign him after what he has shown he is capable of.

by gizmo010101 on Jul 15, 2009 3:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, I don’t get it either.

by P2 on Jul 15, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

explanation...

I am assuming Moon would need more than the LLE to sign. If we are willing to spend more than that, I would rather use that money on Baby.
Basically, I don’t want to see us spend for Moon and lose on Baby. If we get Moon for the LLE and Baby for a decent price I say get them both. Or maybe we figure out a trade where it works out.
In my opinion, getting Baby back to be our 4th big is more important that spending more than we have to on a backup for PP. We should be able to get someone for the LLE that can do an adequate job.
I should have been more clear!!!

by gizmo010101 on Jul 15, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can't spend more than that

Celtics can only spend more on Davis because they hold his Bird rights. They don’t have any other salary cap exceptions to use for Moon.

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I respectfully disagree

I think a good 2/3 backup like Moon is priority right now. The only theoretical possibility where this could be challenged is in the event of an injury to one of our bigs. I’d rather have a solid backup 2/3 than stash BBD on the bench playing only 7 min a game and waiting for the sky to fall.

BBD filled in adequately at the 4 when we needed him. I thank him for that. BUT, as last year showed us (and I realize it wasn’t the only factor), we don’t win a championship without a well rested PP. Moon is exactly what we need at the position. I think we can win even if someone gets injured and we need to play Scal as our 3rd big, as long as we have a well rested PP with a decent 2/3 backup who can perform with 20-25 min also spelling Ray from time to time. I wouldn’t say the same if we have BBD and run PP into the ground again.

PP is our captain, he’s our finals MVP, he’s the guy who duels LBJ in Game 7s and wins, he’s the guy who scores when nobody else will, he’s the guy who is consistently asked to guard the best player on the floor, he plays point forward in all the big spots, he gets the ball when the game is on the line. Doing what we need to do to make sure he’s well rested and can realistically do these things for us is the priority. It’s the TRUTH!!!!

If we pick up Moon and BBD leaves, and I’m not saying the two are contingent on one another because we just my have our cake and eat it too, don’t forget there’s always the possibility of The Show arriving at the Garden via police escort ala Doug Mirabelli mid season.

Besides, the two really have noting to do with each other unless the only way we can work it is a sign and trade. I think BBD gets a $3.5 offer for 3 years from someone and we match, then Moon comes for the LLE or BAE. He’s already stated he wants to play here, I would imagine he knows what our financial situation is like.

by Ritzybeanboy on Jul 15, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

i agree with almost everything you say but...

Baby will play more than 7 min a game. With KG and Perk starting we would have them between 30-32 min a game in a perfect world. That leaves 16-18 minutes a game for Sheed and Baby off the bench. Scal is the one who would pick up the “injury” minutes or play some 3 if needed.
I just don’t want to go into the season with only three quality bigs. That is why I would prioritize Baby before a backup 2/3. I feel like we could get Stackhouse or someone similar for the LLE and be fine.
Part of the reason that PP was so tired was the fact that he had to play extra due to the KG injury. I bet if you look at his minutes before and after KG’s injury, they were higher after. Just my guess. A good backup is important, but a healthy KG will take some of the load off.
 Your arguement for a backup 3 is very good. It could go either way.
I would love to get Baby and have Moon for the LLE. We would be set if this were the case!!

by gizmo010101 on Jul 15, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think the only person who can make this happen is Moon

a s&t is not going to happen, miami doesn’t want to add payroll. and the heat will likely match an LLE offer. so Moon is going to have to work for it with the Heat if he expects to get away to the Celtics.

by ssspence on Jul 15, 2009 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree...

Moon will have to make some noise for this to happen.

by B-ball on Jul 15, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

i like the song- moon over miami- but i would prefer moon over here in boston. why not both bbd and moon with pruitt behind rondo.

by nazzbo on Jul 15, 2009 4:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Let's shoot the moon!!!!!

Moon river…….And dance by the light of the moon….Darkside of the moon….

by The Real Large James 2 on Jul 15, 2009 4:37 PM EDT reply actions  

And have Moon-Walker as Pierce’s backups.

by P2 on Jul 15, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to be too off topid...

Why is Boston’s priority to re-sign BBD? I just don’t get it. The argument being, what if Perkins, KG, or Wallace go down? Well, the answer is, then the remaining two are still there and we use Scal or, any scrub.

My question is, what if Ray or Pierce go down? Suddenly it’s Giddens,TA, or Walker STARTING (maybe House for Ray, but then Rondo is playing full games)? Really? We need a 2-3 (more like 2-3.5) athletic stopper who isn’t totally braindead on offense (TA). Someone like Moon could handle the big shooting forwards (wallace) or basically anyone else that makes Pierce’s legs turn to jello while his offense get’s sun-spots.

BBD can’t even handle his stupid twitter page. Oh man am I sad about Powe, because he was FAR better than BBD. Big Baby played a few weeks of great ball and suddenly he’s become our salvation. I think not. Sheed was the need. BBD is just baggage that caught a break.

by stevenfuzz on Jul 15, 2009 6:01 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't think it is off topic...

But, I do think Baby is a need. I think more highly of Baby’s game than you do. The 2nd unit will need offense and defense at the 4 position. Wallace will be playing the 5. Moore will be gone. That being said, I am way more concerned about getting a solid 3 backup. But, they are both important. Gettting to the finals this year will be very tough. I think we have the team to do it, but we need as much insurance as we can get. Let’s face it, the Lakers will be there again and Baby actually gave them problems as a rookie in the finals. Additionally, if Baby gets down to the 270-280 weight he is hoping for he will be able to guard bigger 3’s.

by B-ball on Jul 15, 2009 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I mean, I agree to an extent. I think I have seen basically every minute BBD has played as a pro. Last year, before Powe went down, I had started to think that BBD was total trash time. He couldn’t finish or rebound or defend anyone (unless they are really slow). Powe, on the other hand was shining. BBD was way down in the pecking order… before Scal got a head injury, he was outplaying BBD.

It wasn’t until everyone was hurt that BBD played a few big games. Someone had to. Ray was missing, Pierce was exhausted, Rondo was basically doing everything he could. BBD just got caught in a really bad situtaion (great for him), where he could shine in his own little niche for a few weaks. I just think he go TOTALLY overated in that time, and now.

He is a 4th option big man. We need a second option 2-3 (unless someone comes in and plays some great PG and leaves House to shoot), and we just don’t have that.

I can’t believe I am saying this, but Scal is a better 4th option big than TA, GIddens, or Walker are 2nd option wings, see what I mean?

by stevenfuzz on Jul 15, 2009 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I respect your opinion...

but I just can’t agree. I love Powe and I wish he could have stayed, but there is a reason Baby got the starts. Statisically, they are about the same, but Baby is a way better defender: it really is no contest. Powe could never start in this league, Baby will some day. He is way quicker on his feet than most people give him credit. The thing that people need to remember is that he was a 2nd year 2nd rounder on a championship team the last year. He is a “DEVELOPING PLAYER” that has great feet, great passing skills, an outside shot that has an up side (something that Powe does not have. Powe would have never taken that shot against Orlando; he would never have stepped out far enough to get that shot.), he can guard the 5 (something that Powe could not do), Baby has a high basket ball IQ, period. He has made rookie and sophomore mistakes, but they have become less and less. Saying that he is overrated because he took full advantage of his minutes is completely unfair. He earned that 4 spot and I believ that he will prove all his doubters wrong. He is big and does not have much vertical, but if that is all you’re looking at then you are missing allot.
As far as Scal, he is a smart player: not a good one, but a smart one. You don’t have to guard Scal, but you do have to stay on Baby, and Baby is a smart player as well. I’m not here advocating for the Celts to over pay Davis, but he has an up side with his age and his growing range. And, in time he will be a trading chip, something the Celtics could use. If they can sign him for a small contract he will be worth it.

by B-ball on Jul 15, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm with you

Powe was MUCH better than Baby. Not that it’s the be-all and end-all, but check out their relative PERs.

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

How so?

Will someone please explain this to me? If Powe is soooo great, why did he not get the starting minutes when KG went down? He wasn’t hurt at the time Baby took over the 4 spot. Doc had problems with Powe playing defense the way he want him to play. Why did the Celts let Powe walk? even with the threat of losing Baby? The fact is, the Celtics management, Danny Ainge, and Doc all knew that Davis was the better all-around player. And those guys absolutely loved Powe as a person. Why would they let him walk so early? They had plenty of time to feel things out. Why? because they respect him and understand that he is not in the future plans, now he may land another gig.

by B-ball on Jul 15, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

BBD got KG’s minutes as a starter because they couldn’t play Perk and Power together – not enough outside shooting. BBD could hit the outside shot. Powe was a better fill-in for Perk.

- JoeB

by joeb on Jul 15, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I never understood the logic either. It was never really close IMO. BBD has much better an all around game and Powe’s game was never more than trash buckets around the rim. He couldn’t pass, shoot, or play defense as well as BBD and neither were great rebounders. I felt bad that he got hurt because he was a great teammate and he that great game 2 in the finals.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Jul 15, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe: above average. Davis: below average

I acknowledge the weakness of this post right up-front: PER is a practically offense-only statistic.

That said, Powe’s PER in his three seasons has gone 14.6, 20.9, 17.2.
Glen Davis’s has gone 11.3, 10.7. (Playoffs: 8.4, 15.2)
League average PER, by definition, is 15. Powe has been an above average offensive player nearly his whole career. Davis has been well below average. Even in his recent postseason performance, which blew everyone away, he was merely an average offensive player.

How about defense? They’re both below average. But Powe’s opponent’s production is 16.1, while Davis’s is 18.2. This knocks a chink in the argument that Davis is a much better defender. Of course, defense isn’t all 1-on-1, and Davis might understand the team defense better than Powe (I should certainly hope so, or else Doc’s decision to continually play an otherwise much less effective, less efficient player would make no sense). But my point is that there are no available statistics to support the contention that Davis is by far the better defensive player. Defensive rebounding is often considered a defensive statistic — Powe won there last year 5.9 to 4.0 per 36 minutes.

After the All-Star break, Davis’s production did improve — he averaged 12 points (on 48% shooting) and 5.1 boards in 30.4 minutes. But Powe’s also improved with more minutes: 12.3 points (57% shooting) , 7.5 boards, in just 24 minutes per game.

True, Davis hit that jumper to win that game in Orlando, and Powe probably would not have. But 2 points on an offensive rebound/putback in the 2nd quarter are worth as much as 2 points on a buzzer beater at the end of the game. In the long-run, on average, the Celtics would have a better end-of-game point-differential if Powe received more minutes than if Davis did. Powe is an outstanding offensive rebounder, and finds a way to consistently make points for himself without any plays being run for him. He shoots a high percentage from the field, and he gets to the line astoundingly often.

In terms of per-minute production, Powe’s dwarfs Davis’s. Oh, and as for Davis being such a great passer relative to Powe — per 36 minutes, Davis averaged 1.5 assists, Powe averaged 1.3. An extra 0.2 assists per 36 minutes.

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow... are you my twin?

Great post dslack. I agree 100% and I can’t understand why others are so blinded by BBD’s flopping around.

by TomHamilton30 on Jul 15, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can answer this.

Incase you forgot, Power was out for a long time during the season with a right knee strain. During this time Scal was starting (and playing great, actually). Scal had all those concussions, and Big Baby got way more minutes.

The reason why Big Baby started was because it was either him or Moore. Leon Powe was just coming back from injury at the start of the playoffs, further more the press was asking if he was coming back too soon. Then, he almost immediately blew out his knee.

Regardless, this argument proves my point. We are arguing the who’s better out of a list of average players. The Celtics need an above average wing as their second option, they already have options with bigs. My point has been that BBD just shouldn’t be the priority. Get any big or scal as your 4th big option, but figure out this wing situation.

by stevenfuzz on Jul 15, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pers are all the internet craze.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Jul 15, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe was never better than Powe.

His injury just made it easier for the fans ( not really obviously ) to deal with Ainge picking him over Powe.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Jul 15, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe was never better than Powe?

Sorry … I do, of course, see what you mean.

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

If it’s not clear what I meant just think the opposite of what you posted.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Jul 15, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry BBD

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Jul 15, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who doesn't?

What does this mean though?

by markgent on Jul 15, 2009 7:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Its in Moons hands

I think? if Miami matches the LLE offer, Moon can still decide to come to Boston. Miami, by matching the contract, does not automatically retain Moon. Could someone check that.

by Bozo on Jul 15, 2009 9:04 PM EDT reply actions  

No.

Matching a restricted free agent’s offer sheet forces the player to play for the matching team. If players had the choice, Gortat would still be going to Dallas.

by dslack on Jul 15, 2009 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think that Miami will match.

Moon doesn’t really help Miami. They need cap space and another superstar. There team is all role players they don’t need another one eating there cap space.

by liamail on Jul 15, 2009 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Keeping BBD on the roster does not fill much of a need now.

There are 96 minutes for the bigs. Perk, KG and ‘Sheed can cover them if necessary, and if not, the fourth big will nee to play no more than 10 minutes a game, assuming the Cs want to keep KG and Wallace’s minutes down. I’d rather have a vet big at the minimum like Ben Wallace fill the 8-10 minutes a night than BBD at three times the price.

I really don’t care about having BBD ont he roster three or four years from now, either. They’re trying to build a team that can win championships now, and BBD isn’t a franchise type player.

I like a healthy Powe a lot better then BBD in a short minutes role off the bench. Powe has provent hat he can impact a game in short minutes. BBD didn’t shine until he got extended minutes.

Getting a quality backup wing in crucial. Miami might not match a BAE offer of $1.9m over two years because they want to have as few guaranteed deals on their books as possible next year. It’s not a great deal for the 29 year old Moon, who only has a few years to make any real money.

by TripleOT on Jul 15, 2009 10:14 PM EDT reply actions  

...

It’s a great deal for Moon if they win a championship. In 2 years, who knows, he could get a deal like Posey did.

by stevenfuzz on Jul 15, 2009 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the key to Getting Moon

will be to make it a 2+ year deal. It’s next year that Miami won’t want to pay him anything. But that could also mean they want to sign and trade for expiring contracts, in which case we unload some garbage and I’m fine with that. Either way, I still think we match an offer for Glen Davis at $3.5 mil depending on how many years.

by Ritzybeanboy on Jul 15, 2009 11:38 PM EDT reply actions  

As far as BBD..

Someone said Ben Wallace would be a better 4th big than BBD. Eh, unless Wallace is that much better defensively, BBD does have more offense at this point in their careers. None the less, kudos to TOT to throwing SOME name out there to replace BBD, cause surely we all acknowledge we need a fourth big, right?

And yes, I do think spelling Pierce is necessary, so let’s get Moon if we can.

by Tai on Jul 16, 2009 2:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Sign And Trade-Moon For Davis

Just read this Herald article on sign and trade-Davis for Moon. Celtics, Glen Davis moving closer – BostonHerald.com – http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/basketball/celtics/view/20090716celtics_glen_davis_moving_closer/ Seems undoable due to rules. Just shows how complicated this stuff is for these GM’s and players.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Jul 16, 2009 5:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
"We really have only 2 options to keep winning."
Small
Celtics vs. Heat - ECF Matchup
Small
How Avery Bradley's absence affects everyone else
Small
Thoughts on Celtics vs. Heat
Small
Already Doubting The Celtics?
Small
Start Pavlovic over Ray to cover Dirty Wade
Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi