Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Rumor: Big Baby To New Jersey?

Justin Poulin of Celtics Stuff Live reported a rumor that Glen Davis could be headed to New Jersey in a sign and trade.

He didn't have any additional details, but Alex of NES 24/7 heard the same rumor and indicated that Ainge was after Yi Jianlian.  That would make some sense as Ainge was rumored to have liked Yi a lot a few drafts back.

Update: Tom Halzack takes a detailed look at the options on the Nets roster.

As with all rumors, take with a grain of salt.  I do think these roster moves will start to wrap up in the next week or so, but you never know.

Update:  The Herald reports:

Though the Celtics have attempted to include restricted free agent Glen Davis in several sign-and-trade deals with other teams, sources with the Celtics and New Jersey both shot down a rumor this morning that both teams were attempting to make such an arrangement work.

Though the Nets have not approached Davis with an offer sheet, they have made their interest known in the young power forward.

Poll
If a trade happens, who would you like off their roster?
Kenyon Dooling
302 votes
Eduardo Najera
470 votes
Yi Jianlian
1685 votes
Other
169 votes
None
470 votes

3096 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 117 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Eh...

I’m sure there’s as much veracity to this as the “T.J. Ford to the Celtics” or “Starbury will sign with the Celtics imminently” rumors. Grain of salt.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jul 26, 2009 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Yikes

And I thought the players we had to offer were bad…

by Silhouette on Jul 26, 2009 10:32 PM EDT reply actions  

There are guys playing wheelchair basketball with better lateral mobility than Yi JianLian. If you want to win a championship, just match any offer for BBD.

The guy on NJ’s roster who makes the most sense for the Celtics is Rafer Alston, although I don’t see any sensible way to make the salaries match in a sign and trade for BBD, given the base year compensation rules.

by Brickowski on Jul 26, 2009 10:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Danny's white whales

imagine if Danny gets Yi and Robert Swift in the same offseason

all he would need is Outlaw to make it a boxed set

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jul 26, 2009 10:36 PM EDT reply actions  

If we can get two for Baby

If we get Yi,and another player like sean williams. I might be okay with the trade. I do not want Najera.

by green20 on Jul 26, 2009 10:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Yi?

Are you kidding me? He’s terrible.
What a disaster if we trade Baby for Yi.

by Marqui on Jul 26, 2009 10:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Ainge simply can’t let go of the stiffs he covets, can he?

by CoachBo on Jul 26, 2009 10:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I wouldn’t be opposed to this even though I think he sucks. I’d play him solely as a PF. His contract is easily tradeable.

He’s also young and should be getting stronger, building his physique. I’m sure he can play better than what he has shown so far.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 10:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Why would New Jersey do a sign-and-trade?

Why not just use their MLE, which the Celts almost certainly won’t match?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jul 26, 2009 10:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Also...

The Yi “rumor” makes zero sense, because marketing-wise, Yi more than pays for his contract with NJ. He’s much more valuable to the team than BBD could ever be.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jul 26, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really hope you're right.

Because Yi would be a awful fit with Sheed of the bench. We need a post banger, not another floater. Especially not terrible one.

by Marqui on Jul 26, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we can offer more flexibility next year for NJ, with the cap lowering as it is, the might be interested.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

They have 15 players under contract as far as I can tell.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

New Jersey’s owner is mega strapped for cash, so it’d probably be tough for them to outright sign anyone at this point

by Silhouette on Jul 26, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

15 signed players

Nets have 15 signed players, so if BB comes someone has to go anyway. If they could also get salary cap room in 2010 by including Dooling or Najera in a multi-player deal then doing an S&T really works to their advantage. I have thought for awhile NJ makes a logical trading partner (with or without BB) if Dooling and Hayes can be obtained and potentially Najera and/or Sean Williams. Some combination of the Scal/TA/Giddens/Pruitt/Walker group with or without BB can make a NJ trade happen that makese sense for both teams.

Yi I never thought was likely from the NJ perspective, and I don’t really see how he advances the Cs cause as a PF who likes to shoot outside, well we have more than enough of those right now.

by hankfinkel on Jul 26, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why agree to a sign-and-trade, then?

I think we’d be getting back lesser players than BBD. Usually, the threat of a sign-and-trade is “trade me, or I’ll sign there anyway”. If NJ can’t sign him, what’s their leverage?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jul 27, 2009 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

That’s the right thinking behind it, but I believe they want to get something done right now rather than wait out the entire off-season and eventually ending up with nothing. But we can round out our bench pretty nicely with some of NJ’s players.

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

They have 15 guaranteed contracts, and don’t want to pay guys who don’t play or are cut considering their aweful attendance. if you had all that junk on the roster, you’d do the same.

i don’t buy that it’s Yi. it’s Dooling, Williams and their 2010 2nd round pick. then Pruitt gets cut, and Diogu is signed.

by ssspence on Jul 27, 2009 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would love that, but salary-wise it would only work if we thre in another player, like Walker/Giddens. So it would be: Dolling+SWAT+2010 2nd for BBD+Pruitt+Walker. But I would love our bench, LOVE:

C Sheed/SWAT
PF SWAT/Diogu
SF Daniels
SG House/Daniels
PG Dooling

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

i don’t know if or what danny sees in yi who is a big stiff- no fluidity. this offseason is just 1 rumor after another-interesting but too many flights of fancy and not enough meat tho sheed is a gem and if daniels gets here, maybe the player we all wanted tony to be.

by nazzbo on Jul 26, 2009 10:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Look again!

He had 8.6 pts and 5.3 boards in only 23 min a game last year. That’s two consecutive seasons with those numbers. His stats the past 2 years are better than either one of BBD’s. Sure he needs to improve defensively and shoot a better percentage, however he shoots at LEAST as well as BBD does from the outside. We have just the coaching staff to help this kid get better. As far as upside goes he has a lot more than BBD does. Allowing him to get just a few minutes for a couple years off the bench behind KG and Rasheed would be a great move. I’d do this in a hearbeat!

by EJPLAYA on Jul 26, 2009 10:45 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree with you on most of your points here. The kid is 21 years old only. Can shoot the 3 also. And I can’t say this enough, very tradeable asset if needed be. Two seven footers that can shoot the 3 off the bench? Paired up with House shooting 3s, and Daniels slashing? I think that’s a pretty dangerous bench.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

great points EJplaya, and I agree Budweiser

Yi may not be a good defender, but he defends the PF position better than BBD. BBD does have the edge at center though, for sure. Again, Yi is tradeable and has a higher ceiling than BBD. If the Celtics are going to tie up money for the next few years on a player, I’d rather it be a player that has the upside to potentially be a starter on a good team. BBD is not that player.

by TomHamilton30 on Jul 26, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is he 21? Supposedly he's 25.

Not sure if that’s 100% confirmed, but multiple sources have indicated that he was born in 1984. Which makes a big difference in terms of upside.

by PJ Martinez on Jul 27, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hasn't it been confirmed that Yi is 45 years old?

Too slow, too old, too soft,

Danny, say it ain't so? We love Powe!

by johnnyrondo on Jul 26, 2009 10:45 PM EDT reply actions  

How about Brook Lopez?

I’d take him. He’s a legit seven-footer who can rebound and block some shots (13 pts , 8.1 reb, 1.8 blk). Plus, he’s a Tom Heinsohn favorite… XD

by BleedinGreen417 on Jul 26, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions  

New Jersey won't trade Lopez

They have a good young core with him and Devin Harris.

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Jul 26, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rumor = mentioned by fans on a discussion forum.

Please everyone, do not talk like this is something Danny is trying to do. There is not evidence that it is.

by guava_wrench on Jul 26, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Are you calling Justin Poulin a liar? lol

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yi of little faith

that this will happen.

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Jul 26, 2009 10:59 PM EDT reply actions  

well

Batman is on the Nets now, we could bring him back home to Boston.

by Scalablob990 on Jul 26, 2009 11:00 PM EDT reply actions  

If only they had the other Lopez… then Batman would’ve had his sidekick.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Baby was supposed to be in Omaha Saturday

Fafnir and I went to go see him at a Charity game but he was awol. Faffy had emailed one of the organizers earlier in the week to ask about baby. He just got an email from the guy saying that Baby apologized for missing the Celtics fans who came. Baby said he got a call from Ainge and had to go back to Boston for contract discussion. So maybe a sign and trade is Imminent. If it’s not just for Yi, I can see it happening. If Jersey wants to pay Baby 4 mil a year, they can have him.

by Aeacus_ on Jul 26, 2009 11:03 PM EDT reply actions  

I would take

keyon dooling and sean williams. they would both fit well with the current roster. I might take Yi but he would have to be packaged with at least one of the other guys, and i don’t think NJ would ever give up all the dough he makes them.

Dooling and williams would probably be worth big baby tho, although we would lose some valuable scoring from BBD.

by born.an.mc on Jul 26, 2009 11:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I think PG is Ainge's aim

They have three. Dooling or Skip could be dealt with another player (well, skip later in the season. Or do two trades)

by Wide Load on Jul 26, 2009 11:19 PM EDT reply actions  

he can ball..

He’s real young and skilled.. he can only get better. He can also get stronger and I’m sure being on a team with the likes of KG and Rasheed is going to make him a tougher player.. I’d do that sign and trade.. Big Baby was good and all, but i think he’s a limited player.

Celtics BABY

by TheProtege on Jul 26, 2009 11:23 PM EDT reply actions  

couldn't agree more

yi is still only 21 years old. He could really use Garnett’s and Rasheed’s guidance. He’s pretty dang athletic and could develop into a nice player. I would be more comfortable about our future, honestly. A few years down the road, Rondo, Yi, and Perkins would be a pretty nice foundation.

We know what Davis is capable of. He played fantastic in last year’s playoffs. but as you say he’s limited, by his size and athletic ability. Yi is taller and can rebound better.

by trey on Jul 27, 2009 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Go for Yi

I would take Yi in a heartbeat. I think he’s got great potential still and would be part of the core in a few years after the Big 3 (and Sheed) get older. All he needs is some confidence and a good coaching staff. KG and Sheed would also be great mentors for him. I think he could develop into a similar type of player. They are all tall, long, very athletic, agile and good shooters from the outside.

by Newguy on Jul 26, 2009 11:23 PM EDT reply actions  

by he i meant YI

Celtics BABY

by TheProtege on Jul 26, 2009 11:24 PM EDT reply actions  

The Nets aren't trading Yi

for BBD in a S and T. They’d have to take on another player from the Cs to make the numbers work, because BBD is a BYC player, and the Nets don’t have any roster room. They could take back Scal to make the numbers work and send Yi and a minimum guy like Chris Douglas Roberts back, but they’d be adding a couple million in payroll, which isn’t likely.

They might be willing to do Dooling and Sean Williams for Scal and BBD if the Cs send a few million their way. They could get Dooling off their books next year, and add a widebody they need in BBD for around $3m a year, a reasonable number on their cap next year, $800k less than what Dooling would have gotten.

Dooling is the odd man out on a roster with Devin Harris and Rafer Alston.

by TripleOT on Jul 26, 2009 11:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

Makes no sense for them. He earns them a lot of money, which will help them move the team.

PG. Backup C. Those are what they have spares of.

by Wide Load on Jul 26, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, they'd be willing to move a bench player

to avoid the risk of the C’s matching if they want BBD. But they won’t give up Yi.

by Fafnir on Jul 26, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why not?

Yi + Dooling for Scal and Baby + Cash and/or Pick. Why NJ wouldn’t be interested in this? They get more cap room which they really covet, for next year plust the cash/pick insentive.

They can easily give up on Yi, especially if they think that the 7 million Yi and Dooling make together will hinder them some next year.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because Yi makes them so much money in China

There was an article that came out this offseason that said the “Nets are not going to trade Yi because he makes them to much money”

Is Davis really that much of an upgrade for them to trade away that income? Especially when they are trying to build a new arena in NY City?

by Wide Load on Jul 26, 2009 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you miss the part where I mentioned cap room?

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

They already have the cap room they needed

Including Yi, who will rake in the dollars for them.

Which they need to move the team across the river.

Which they need to do to attract the big catch FA.

by Wide Load on Jul 26, 2009 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, they don’t have all the cap room they would want. They have about 9 million in team options that they should pick-up because they’re good prospects (Lopez, Yi, Lee, Douglas-Roberts). You can add Sean Williams in there if you want, that would make 11 million. Then you have Josh Boone who is a restricted free-agent. Then you add to that the cap going down next year.

They’ll have a tough time retaining most of this players and getting two max-contracts of interest as is.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

So basically, they don;t have to pick up those options

And replacing one of them with Davis’ contract doesn’t make sense.

Points more towards a longer guaranteed contract.

And at least keep the Yi money machine there for another year.

by Wide Load on Jul 26, 2009 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

The point is not that Baby replaces Yi’s contract. Is that they get rid of Dooling’s contract, for example. Not picking those options would be a mistake, especially if you have to make the choice prior to free-agency. In fact, I’m pretty sure they have to make the decision by November of this year or so.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 27, 2009 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Nets are under the cap. We can easily make this work.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 26, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

i wouldnt want any of those players. the only reason to have Yi is to boost rayings.
if baby is traded it should be for a good player like camby or chandler, etc…damn this rumor is sickning

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jul 26, 2009 11:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I SUPPORT YI

You don’t understand YI at all
He is hard working and he just need a chance to prove himself
I believe the young boy can help BC

by ALLENWHITE on Jul 26, 2009 11:55 PM EDT reply actions  

If htere’s any truth to this I’d go for Yi. I watched him play on his team in china before his draft and liked what I saw. He’s a role player. Not a main guy. I think he’d fit in well in boston.

by furball2323 on Jul 27, 2009 12:12 AM EDT reply actions  

injured?

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jul 27, 2009 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

maybe if he he sat on garnetts shoulders and just swatted balls all game

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jul 27, 2009 12:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did I mention anything about him being an all-star caliber player? You might be forgetting all the Chinese voters, especially with Yao out.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 27, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

true...

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jul 27, 2009 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes

Because every single one of the 1 billion people from china have the same exact characteristics.

by jdpapa3 on Jul 27, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting to note

that Yi posted a considerably better rebound rate than BBD this year.

More than anything, that’s a testament against the Infant’s work on the boards, certainly more so than it is one for Yi or necessarily in favor of a sign-and-trade.

That said, Dooling would be a fine pick-up for this time. Did some solid spot work for the Nets last season, comes from Missouri and isn’t named Marbury. Sign me up for him, at least.

-sw

"I didn't go there with the intentions of getting ejected. I went there with the intentions of just telling Kobe, 'You got to relax. You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?'" -Ron Artest, 05.06.09

by Steve Weinman on Jul 27, 2009 12:39 AM EDT reply actions  

he’s 7 ft compared to baby at 6’5 is would hope the hell he could rebound better. now if he could only hit his shot consistantly and play good defense

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jul 27, 2009 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

6'5?

I think you’re over exaggerating there.

by Marqui on Jul 27, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

6'7

I spoke with him at length and sized him up. I remember looking at how short his arm length was as he was eating a vanilla ice cream cone. He said he was 6’7 and this was right after he was drafted.

by Little D on Jul 27, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

i would do a deal for dooling and jianlian. although i remember ray allen and dooling getting in an altercation where a punch or two was thrown in a game a few years back. i wonder if this would affect the (possible) deal or not.

by trey on Jul 27, 2009 1:39 AM EDT reply actions  

If it’s a S&T for Sean Williams, then yes please. Make it happen.

Not all that impressed with The Chairman.

by a tommy point on Jul 27, 2009 2:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Oh yeah, Sean Willams

2nd time around in Boston couldn’t be amy worse than his first time, could it?

by Little D on Jul 27, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

BBD or Yi nothing else!

One of them is enough, but I would prefer BBD because he is the better defender against Shag. Yi would be the 4th Shot-Blocker because of his size, but isn’t very strong and had a bad FG% last year…

I asked god and he said: L.A. will lose again next year!! ^_°

by greenmech on Jul 27, 2009 5:12 AM EDT reply actions  

Weird. The NES 24/7 writer first says “Glen Davis will most likely be in a Nets uniform next season” and mentions Justin of CSL as saying “the deal is essentially done”, but in the same sentence says Ainge will pull the trigger only if we can get somebody useful (which better make sense). So if the deal is “essentially done”, how come Ainge doesn’t even know who he’s getting back?

Then he also says “the Celtics will win either way by either keeping Davis at a price they want or by adding a piece from NJ”. So is the deal “essentially done” or is it just a vague romor?

I hope the BBD saga ends very soon!

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 6:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Not a CHANCE

First of all, none of you realize how good Yi will be, or how much he’s already built up his body.

Second, why the hell would we trade Yi for Big Baby? We need a “moose” and I’d love to get BBD, but he’s not even in Yi’s class as a bball player.

by KidShizzle on Jul 27, 2009 7:00 AM EDT reply actions  

FYI: This guy is not my source

…but he claims to know something about all this.

http://twitter.com/MatthewDHume

take it for what it is worth

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jul 27, 2009 7:07 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t know, but I really have a feeling that something like BBD+Scal+Pruitt for Sean Williams/Dooling/Najera could materialize very soon.

Or BBD for Yi straight up or Najera+pick.

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 7:53 AM EDT reply actions  

3-for-3 or 1-for-1.

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

And if we get SWAT/Dooling/Najera, we basically sign or trade for Daniels and our bench is:

C Sheed/SWAT
PF Najera/SWAT
SF Daniels/Najera
SG House/Daniels
PG Dooling/House

I woul love that bench.

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

I could see that happening too

we’ll see though

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Jul 27, 2009 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

her is the SCARY thought..if boston loses baby then who do they go after

as a big man..i mean 2 bigs? they have to find some girth for the bench

by celticinorlando on Jul 27, 2009 8:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Not scary, our big man bench currently has KG, Perk, Sheed, and Scal. 3 of those are excellent PF and Center defenders, the other one can stepup decently when needed. What we need is depth, anthing more is pure gravy.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 27, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

scal as the primary PF? no way

that is a good thing…you are making a case for more depth as I am…my orginial post was about replacing baby on the bench with someone…losing him for free would really hurt the bench

by celticinorlando on Jul 27, 2009 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Scal is not the primary PF. Sheed is the primary PF and C.

by BudweiserCeltic on Jul 27, 2009 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

They would get back either Najera or Sean Williams in any combination, and they would likely sign one of Diogu or Swift.

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

get me Yi, dooling and a 1st round pick for baby...

you have a big and point, you have daniels coming…you still have the biannual to offer another big and you can add bowen on the cheap…..

by celticinorlando on Jul 27, 2009 8:25 AM EDT reply actions  

You gotta be kidding me. There’s only one player I would trade Big Baby for: Chris Paul. Ridiculous.

by P2 on Jul 27, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

AND I OBVIOUSLY KNOW WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO GET THOSE PLAYERS!

My point is that I do not know who at all I would trade for on the Nets in a sign and trade with Big Baby because those are the only three players I would want because all the others are not good at all.

by Mike-Dub on Jul 27, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

We’re supposed to laugh at this, right?

by a tommy point on Jul 27, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is this site for real...

Nobody here posting made any sense what so ever… just a bunch of guys calling each other names over rumors… we’re all here for the same cause so ease up on one another…. now basketball talk: :-)

If Yi came over, it would be the equivalent of BBD b/c HE TOO prefers to SHOOT from the outside over banging inside (b/c of hes 6’6)…. And Yi CAN bang inside (w/more efficeincy than BBD b/c of his height) but he plays along side Lopez who is a LEGIT banger…theoretically, they cant swap places on the floor and expect to keep things spaced out for good offense.
As far as coaching goes, no diss to LawrenceFrank but I think Doc knows what to do w/his pieces (especially since he has better ones, yea) and if he had a problem like Yi (sarcasm for you negative pundits), Im sure he’d have room for a 7ft’r who can post up AND shoot it decent from 15-20ft… thats just not a problem Id want on my basketball team… As a basketball fan and a REALIST, Im afraid of what you really want. (keyon doolng?GARBAGE!)

by WeakTheoryCrusher on Jul 27, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions  

i really dont like this deal.........

“In the midst of all this, Alex from NES 24/7 called into the show for a 30-minute conversation on sign and trade rumors. For fans who dislike rumor talk, the middle of the show is not for you, but for the rest of us who enjoy speculation it was a hit. Alex confirmed that he had been hearing the same rumor as Justin from a different source; that Glen Davis is headed to New Jersey in a sign and trade. While Justin was reluctant to post any such rumor in print without specific details, Alex reported that Yi Jianlian was the target and it is likely that no further details have been sorted out yet. "

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jul 27, 2009 1:24 PM EDT reply actions  

per the update from the herald

i don’t believe Davis is going to NJ. there is a VERY good chance — if doesn’t resign with the Cs — he could be part of a deal that sends Boozer to NJ, or Boozer directly to Boston. either way he ends up in Utah.

by ssspence on Jul 27, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not gonna happen. The Meadowlands are near empty, overpriced, and the team sucks.

Not that Yi is a draw, but he must account for some Chinese bball fans from the NY Metro area. They have to take anyone they can get in that dump.

by BirdNerd on Jul 27, 2009 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
my turn on rondo..
Small
No Trade
Small
center trade
Small
The Importance of the 6th Seed
Small
Debunking the "Build around Rondo" myth
Imagesca5vwn2y_small
Don't Worry
J0382610_small
Danny Ainge will have to trade Bass et al in exchange of . . .
Small
Why it makes no sense to blow this team up
Small
New CBA, contracts, and opt-outs
I_want_to_believe_small
The Reality of Rondo

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi