Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Steph May Be Done Here

The Globe Reports:

Celtics free agent guard Stephon Marbury said to The Globe early Friday morning that he doesn't expect to be returning to Boston after receiving a disappointing one-year contract paying $1.3 million using the veteran's minimum.

The 32-year-old said three other teams, which he would not disclose, are currently interested.

Despite the disappointment for Marbury, he was thankful the Celtics gave him a chance after his Knicks situation ended.

"Thank you Boston for allowing the world to see me play again after all that went on in N.Y.," said Marbury, via e-mail to The Globe. "The fans treated me with open arms and that's all anyone can ask for."

Boston has three other point guards on the roster in Rajon Rondo, Eddie House and Gabe Pruitt, who has a team option for next season that must be decided upon by Aug. 1. The Celtics have also inquired about Orlando free agent point guard Tyronn Lue.

Comment 57 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from CelticsBlog

Worst. Celtic. Ever. (Vote)

Oct 2011 by Jeff Clark - 70 comments

2008 Reboot?

Mar 2011 by Jeff Clark - 66 comments

Comments

Display:

well...boston def. needs to sign a big

a wing and a point now…better get busy danny

by celticinorlando on Jul 3, 2009 8:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Can anything else go wrong for us?

:(

"It will be fun watching the Lakers get those balloons down one at a time." - Bill Russell

by silvershamrocker on Jul 3, 2009 8:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Why would they even insult him with a 1.2 million dollar offer?

by VagrantWade on Jul 3, 2009 8:28 AM EDT reply actions  

That's an insult to Marbury? It's more of an insult of management's intelligence.

What in Marbury’s performance for us merited even the vet’s minimum? We could have easily gotten better production from Pruitt or an NBDL PG without all of the narcissism.

by Finkelskyhook on Jul 3, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it really going wrong--

or did Danny and Doc merely play their role perfectly: speak highly of the vet they had come in and play with them and refer to wanting them back—but offer a ‘no thank you’ minimum contract? Lester and Gabe are interesting combo guard possibilities and there are always plenty of washed up veteran points out there cheap as well. I think the C’s deal with the 5, 3 and 4 positions before feeling pressured at the 1. Unfortunately, Marbury underperformed embarrassing throughout his time here. Especially if they add experience with Sheed and at the backup 3, they can afford a little youth at the backup 1/2 spots.

by clover on Jul 3, 2009 8:32 AM EDT reply actions  

he must have been deluding himself

if he thought he could get anything more from the Celtics.

by Pengaloo on Jul 3, 2009 8:32 AM EDT reply actions  

If he goes to the Lakers or another contender....

"It will be fun watching the Lakers get those balloons down one at a time." - Bill Russell

by silvershamrocker on Jul 3, 2009 8:34 AM EDT reply actions  

So let me get this straight...

No more Starbury…no more Leon Powe….and all you’ve brought in to help so far is the crappy Stromile Swift. And who knows whats going on in Rondo’s head, whether he knows he was going to not get traded or not. And Danny thinks Rasheed Wallace is the answer to all these problems?

I had more confidence in a championship-caliber roster that included an injured Garnett this year.

by Justin_Bobo on Jul 3, 2009 8:36 AM EDT reply actions  

What did you want?

Anything more than the vet minimum eats into the MLE. Danny needs his MLE for players who are better than Steph. Would you prefer to bring back Starbury and his 4.4 PER and lose out on Rasheed, Grant Hill, or some other player who could actually help the team win?

by dslack on Jul 3, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

what a surprise

I thought Marbury was saying he didn’t really care about the money side of things.

by no kidding on Jul 3, 2009 8:40 AM EDT reply actions  

They actually offered Marbury a contract?

I don`t know what`s more shocking…

The fact that Boston offered him anything OR the fact that he rejected it!!!

by Title 18 on Jul 3, 2009 8:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Backup PG options

Looks like Tyrone Lue or Antonio Daniels. we can’t make the finals with Eddie as our No. 2 PG. Grant Hill could be an option if he comes to Boston, but I would prefer re-signing Marbury or trading TA, Scal, Gabe for a capable backup.

by SCBirdman33 on Jul 3, 2009 8:42 AM EDT reply actions  

hmm

Didn’t we already win the finals with Eddie as our No. 2 PG? ha

by Silhouette on Jul 3, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

hudson wont even make the team and pruitt

has shown ZERO in 2 years…i didn’t think we could get any worse than last year’s bench but we are sure headed that way. looks like another year of tony allen jacking up wild shots, eddie trying to run the point…pierce playing 40 plus minutes, garnett playing 40 plus minutes with scal trying to back up the power forward spot….bill walker getting nothing but garbage time dunks, giddens looking nice in his suit and robert swift playing this year’s version of POB…

lets recap…baby might walk…boston has every egg in the basket of 1 big man in sheed…who prolly goes to the spurs….goodbye marbury…goodbye powe….danny are you even trying? lue stinks. there is a reason he couldn’t beat anthony johnson out in orlando…daniels is old and washed up….i really don’t like anyone on the boston bench except eddie..don’t think they have anything in walker, giddens, scal and tony..

by celticinorlando on Jul 3, 2009 8:43 AM EDT reply actions  

sounds like renta steph is over. what- he expected more? we need the dough for a big and a wingman.

by nazzbo on Jul 3, 2009 8:44 AM EDT reply actions  

his fault....

Not interested in a ring?? Than just go away…. But damn, he was a good assist-man backup for Rondo but I like the idea of Grant Hill as well – but I think that never happens…

I asked god and he said: L.A. will lose again next year!! ^_°

by greenmech on Jul 3, 2009 8:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Just have to get another backup

This news really doesn’t do much for me one way or another.

by Berkcelt on Jul 3, 2009 8:47 AM EDT reply actions  

If danny lets this guys leave,

He’s dropping the ball. A motivated, skilled, vet PG with a lot to prove and a love for playing here….

I agree with powe, but after his snub then this, i really wouldnt be surprised if they offered ray allen the vet minimum next year or just told him they dont want him back….

I guess with danny, anything is possible…

by cordialb on Jul 3, 2009 8:50 AM EDT reply actions  

I’d be motivated for the veteran’s minimum….But like Marbury, I can’t shoot.

by Finkelskyhook on Jul 3, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

danny got who he wanted already in free agency...robert swift

his work his done….just resign mikki moore and things will be just peachy

by celticinorlando on Jul 3, 2009 8:54 AM EDT reply actions  

This can be placed in just about every recent thread topic:

It’s amazing to me the amount of panic and disillusionment that some of our fellow CelticsBloggers continue to show.

Be patient. Let Danny and Doc do their jobs.

There are so many factors involved in the team’s decision making process as to free agents, roster spots, short term plan, long term plan, cash flow factors…………..I assure you we don’t know half of the factors involved.

Everybody thinks they know more than the people in charge of running this team. I nearly got sick reading many of the ‘hater’ posts (hating Danny, hating the Celtics franchise in general, hating anyone involved in the decision) in the “Powe-tition” thread. And I liked Leon as much as any one of us.

Let them do what they know best. That’s what they’ve been hired to do……….and at this point, they’ve done a damn good job. Better than anyone had done for the past twenty years!

by DrD on Jul 3, 2009 8:57 AM EDT reply actions  

We were patient with Danny last year

Still not convinced that Danny is one of the top GMs when it comes to free agents nor that the ownership will spend the required money. So far Robert Swift is on the summer league roster and Marbury and Powe are likely gone (although maybe Powe comes back). And, while I am not panicking (yet), most of the other elite teams have already made solid moves. I am getting more worried that this offseason could be worse than last (if that is possible).

by vinnie on Jul 3, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Marbury

We better be able to get Marbury back because I MUCH MUCH MUCH rather have him than Tyrone Lue… Tyrone Lue is TERRIBLE!

by Mike-Dub on Jul 3, 2009 8:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Marbury is terrible, too

His PER last year was 4.4. In the playoffs, when he hit huge shot after huge shot, his PER shot to an astronomical 4.6. Lue’s not the bee’s knees either — PER of 9.4 last year — but played significantly better in the statistically measured ways than Marbury did.

by dslack on Jul 3, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

having no backup PG is awesome!!!1

God bless and good night!

by BrickJames on Jul 3, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey Brick:

Did we really have a backup PG when Marbury was on our roster?

by Finkelskyhook on Jul 3, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

we let them do their job last season and

look how that turned out…resign tony allen..big signing of POB…at this point my faith in ainge is pretty low.

by celticinorlando on Jul 3, 2009 9:12 AM EDT reply actions  

How soon we forget.

Neither POB or Posey would have made a scrap of difference with KG on the shelf for half the season.

Looking at it now in light of the KG injury, Posey’s decision to leave Boston doesn’t look nearly as bad and in fact, may be no big deal by the time this year’s free agency is all said and done And remember, it was his decision to leave Boston.

As for Tony Allen, don’t you think Doc had some input on this. Or is everything Danny’s fault if it should go wrong?

by DrD on Jul 3, 2009 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

when POB is your only big signing and then is traded

the offseason was a bust. posey would have made a difference. it is ainge’s responsiblity to be prepapred for everything. boston wasnt big enough from the start of the season. and now that they went through that they must change it this year…so far baby might walk, powe was cut and they might lose their only big target in sheed. then what? robert swift? scal backing up KG? i am not prepared for danny to sit back and pick up a scrap to plug in because he was too cheap or too stubborn. you think robert swift and mikki moore are going to help this team get out of the east?

by celticinorlando on Jul 3, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Send your resume..............

…….to WYC. You never know, maybe he feels exactly like you do and he’s looking?

i) Once again, Posey was not the determining factor in whether the C’s won #18 or not. It was KG’s injury period. Not to be rude, but that’s the bottom line.
If you would like to say that the prospective chances for winning #18 would have been better at the beginning of the season if we had Posey, so be it. Let’s no lose sight of the fact that this team was on a record pace for the first 30 games or so without Posey.
ii) As I recall, McDyess turned us down for Detroit.

Actually, I’ll end this here without addressing any additional facts. It’s really not necessary.

Let’s just agree that we all want #18 whether it’s with or without James Posey et al.

by DrD on Jul 3, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's not about Posey

First, off, I generally like the job Danny has done. But I do think he dropped the ball last offseason. He signed 2 stiffs in POB and Tony Allen who did not contribute at all to the record pace of the first 30 games, and who could not even contribute meaningfully when half the team went down with injuries.

Letting Posey go was the right decision — I think we’ll all be glad that the team isn’t on the hook for $7M to Posey in 2 seasons.

But last summer’s free agent scene was bigger than James Posey, Patrick O’Bryant, and Tony Allen. How about Matt Barnes, Chris Andersen, Mickael Pietrus? Those guys could have gotten some burn in the first 30 games, and could have helped a great deal when Garnett and Powe went down.

by dslack on Jul 3, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would have liked Chris Andersen better...

than POB, but overall, I think Danny has done fine.

by VtCeltics on Jul 3, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have mixed feelings on this. on the one hand he didn’t give us much last year whileon the other pruitt and eddie aren’t pgs. It also seems like danny and wyc constantly cheap out and lose players they say they want. wyc talks about being willing to spend the money but when it comes time to do so he cheaps out

by Red2 on Jul 3, 2009 9:17 AM EDT reply actions  

good point....i am tired of all the talk..go get what you need or

just tell us we are shooting for the division title…they are cheap and it cost them last year

by celticinorlando on Jul 3, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh Please!

The only thing Marbury did well last season was provide a really good attitude. If any other Celtic played as bad as he did for three months everyone would have run him out of town. None of the younger players played that poorly for that length of time.

This isn’t a surprise. The only thing that concerns me is that we have all this money tied up in Paul, Ray, and KG that we really don’t have much wiggle room regarding other players. Resigning Marbury was never a priority for this team if Eddie came back. The two of them on the floor together created problems for us.

And did Marbury’s recent comments about New York suggest he was returning to old form?

by amenhotep04 on Jul 3, 2009 9:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Obviously Marbury was an innocent bystander in NY.

I’m sure D’Antoni benched his most talented player because D’Antoni is a jerk….He seems to have a history of that.

Marbury did a great imitation of Iverson with the temporary first impression thing…..Let him grow on someone else.

by Finkelskyhook on Jul 3, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Danny, you better have something up your sleeve...

because despite the interest, it’s not a given that Sheed will come to Boston. You let Powe go, by the looks of it Baby isn’t coming back, and now you’re letting Marbury leave the team he probably wanted to play for the most in his career. So, we’re left in need of a backup PG, a backup SF, and a solid C. And all we have so far is a paler version of POB.

Danny, you better have a few surprises for us.

With Wyc’s comments some weeks ago about getting in the 2010 free agent race, I wonder if the front office is trying to open some salary space.

by braz on Jul 3, 2009 9:27 AM EDT reply actions  

how can this disappoint you?

You’d rather use MLE money on a guy whose PER was 4.4 last season? Great off-court attitude and all, but he killed the Celtics with his on-court play.

by dslack on Jul 3, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

He obviously turned it down because it was only for 1 year. Not because of the amount.

by VagrantWade on Jul 3, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

It’s early. I think it is the beginning of july. The championships are almost a year from now. Somebody might accidentally kick hum self in the mouth with all of these knee jerk reactions.

by johnnymost on Jul 3, 2009 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Why, WHy , WHy...

would you sign Leon Powe? He just had his 3rd serious knee injury and won’t be back to his past skill level for another year. Don’t get me wrong, I am not talking about his high moral character or his past performance, I’m talking about his current ability to play basketball at the nba level.

by Little D on Jul 3, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions  

REALITY CHECK

and the massive amount of money tied up in three players, it almost seems like Ainge MUST make a trade. The celts basically have enough for one MLE (which as someone mentioned at least appears to be 2000 percent invested in landing Wallace…i never even hear mention of what happens if he doesn’t sign) and then some additional replacement money (powe, marbury, etc) to fill out the roster. So as far as dramatic changes, WITHOUT a trade, Wallace is it (or whoever that player ultimately becomes). I think it is very obvious based on the offers already made (2 years to Rsheed, 1 year to marbury, nothing to powe etc), WYC is NOT going deep into the tax…so, and i am no genius, but if there wants to be so wholesale changes a trade must be imminent. There is no one as good as Rondo really avail unless you totally dismiss the future and go with a Kidd (which is probably already too late) so you have to figure it is Allen. And in this economy, i am not sure how many people are interested in the 19 million, even for a year, without some cash and player concession.
long and short of it…Ainge, Wyc and Rivers are in a tricky spot. what will probably hapen…is everyone stays and you add one player like Rasheed.

by lakersbluedevil on Jul 3, 2009 9:58 AM EDT reply actions  

I think...

We end up increasing our offer to the LLE, and he ends up signing with us. He said he really wants to contend for a title, I think he’s posturing for more money now but ends up in green.

by Evantime34 on Jul 3, 2009 10:39 AM EDT reply actions  

All this Talk

about Lue not being able to beat out Johnson if Lue had to beat out Starbury for the backup spot he would. I can’t believe all the respect for a guy that we needed to step up time and time again and time and time again he failed. The Celtics Brass gave him a contract deserving of his play. And he got 1.3 million for two months of crappy play. I believe he’s a decent backup but there are plenty of decent backup PG. Besides the jury is still out on this guy being a cancer and the fact he can go somewhere else is good that we don’t have to find out for one more year.

by nsadoru2 on Jul 3, 2009 11:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Come on...

He’s an all star calibur player who performed poorly last year because he hadn’t played basketball in months before playing for us. Mark my words, when he joins a team and has a full training camp and offseason under his belt he will be very good. You have to look at the body of his work not just last year when he was rusty.

by Evantime34 on Jul 3, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Wallace doesn't work out

there still is Mcdyess for a year or if he lasts Bass who is young also. Grant Hill would also be a nice stop gap guy for a year.

by nsadoru2 on Jul 3, 2009 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

I, for one, don't blame Marbury.

If he can get more elsewhere, than all the more power too him. I’m glad we could have him on last year, and he seems to be taking it with a good bit of class.

by Ben Buchanan on Jul 3, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

this makes me so angry. the guy got paid $20M a year to “play” for the Knicks over several years. why is money even a factor in his decision? he was heavily overpaid then…this offer would probably slightly underpay him (with a shot at a ring), it all works out. he needs a reality check.

by Rondoholic on Jul 3, 2009 4:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Good, I think Eddie earned those minutes anyway.

by Q$ on Jul 4, 2009 3:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Tyronn Lue is better anyway

Marbury is washed up, a headache in the lockerroom, and not a good fit in the team system anyway. He’s probably the most overrated player of the last decade considering people talk about him like he’s a former superstar when the reality is he’s a two time all-star and 5 years removed from his last selection.

As a Knick fan it kills me that we passed up Rondo “because we didn’t need a PG” and instead drafted Renaldo Balkman… who we later traded for a second round pick. Balkman wasn’t even projected for the 1st round and the Knicks had the 29th pick if they wanted him so bad…. (Isiah = the most overrated drafter of all-time).

Two years later Marbury can’t even carry Rondo’s bags.

by Real 2K Insider on Jul 4, 2009 4:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi