Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kentucky Football: Tee Martin Reportedly Leaving for USC

Please, No Creative PG Solutions

Ainge has crossed a number of items off his to-do list this summer.  Veteran big man off the bench; check.  Backup wing player to give Pierce and Ray more rest; check.  More depth for the frontcourt; check.  Down on the list but not to be overlooked is the backup point guard position.

Sure, Rajon Rondo is young and in theory he can log longer than average minutes.  But what is the point in running him down all year and expecting him to step up in the post season?  And how about the sprained ankles that seemed to happen every other week for a stretch last year?  You need a guy you can plug in for long minutes if and when Rondo misses some games here and there (or worse).

The summer clock is ticking away and there's no obvious solution presenting itself.  So it is only natural to start thinking up creative solutions and trying to guess at what the Celtics might do if they just can't find a backup for the right price.  It is my sincere hope that those ideas are just fodder for message board discussion and not actually being considered seriously in Waltham.  Here are some options and a few reasons why I don't like them.

Star-divide

Let Eddie House give it another shot:

Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.  Cue the Who... "I won't be fooled again."

If the last two years have proven anything, it is that Eddie House is a shooting guard, period.  Can he be a 3rd string guy or a situational matchup solution?  Absolutely.  Is he a long-term answer?  Negative.  Let's just move on.

Speaking of the last two years...

Bide time until the trade deadline and pick up a guy that was waived:

Sam Cassell is not walking through that door.  I don't yet know if Stephon Marbury is walking through that door, but if he does, it will be in training camp, not February.  I have no idea who might be available 6 months from now but I know I don't want to wait that long to find out.

Let Marquis Daniels give it a shot:

First of all, if anyone is curious why this keeps coming up, just blame Don Nelson.  During Marquis' rookie season Steve Nash came down with a stomach flu.  Non-conformist Nelson threw Daniels into the lineup and the kid responded with "14 points, 9 rebounds and 9 assists followed by a 16 point, 7 rebound and 8 assist game in a loss against the T-Wolves the next night." (according to Wikipedia)

So why not let him try it again?  For one thing, because nobody's tried it again and there's probably a reason for that.  He's probably just better off as a wing player.  I'm all for versatility and I think it is great that he can help out in a pinch, but just like with House, I don't see him as a long term solution.

Give the job to Lester Hudson:

Perhaps the wording of this option is a bit unfair.  You typically don't hand the job to a rookie and you seldom count on the 58th pick.  Can he run the point?  Maybe he'll grow into that job someday, but I find it hard to believe that he can make the transition this year.  I find it even harder to believe that he'll be activated on this roster ahead of 2 or 3 other guys.  But who knows?  Maybe he can make believers of us all.  You just can't count on that right now.

If you think he can compete for the job, you still have to bring in a couple of castoff vets to compete for the job with him in training camp.  Still, you are rolling the dice on any of those guys.

The Better Solution:

I'm hoping that Ainge has talked to a number of point guard solutions that are playing the market, waiting to see if they can get anything more than the vet minimum.  As the summer winds down, agents will start doing the math and realize that there's a limited number of seats and advise their clients to sit down before the music cuts off.

That doesn't mean that Danny can't get creative.  He might try to give Jason Williams one last roll of the dice.  He might opt for Starbury round 2.  He might even try to resurrect Tinsley's image.  Or maybe he'll just bring in KG's BFF Ty Lue and call it a day.  Who knows?  As long as the guy has played in the league as an NBA point guard I'll consider it a better solution than any of the above.

Poll
Would you be ok with Daniels and House backing up Rondo at the point?
Yes
982 votes
No
1222 votes

2204 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 66 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think Ainge has already given a hint regarding what he's thinking...
We like Gabe but he was not going to get a chance to play much with Marquis (Daniels) coming in," Celtics president of basketball operations Danny Ainge said. “He has a bright future and this will give him a chance to play elsewhere.”

Link

To me, that’s evidence that the team sees Daniels as a primary ball handler.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Aug 10, 2009 11:41 PM EDT reply actions  

maybe

but I am hoping to chalk that up to Ainge’s view of roster spots, not specific rotation positions

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Aug 10, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they plan on using House and Daniels together

So our nine man rotation will be Rondo, Ray, Pierce, KG, Perkins starting. Then Rasheed, Daniels, Eddie, and Baby coming of the bench.

Daniels and Eddie will probably end up splitting ball handling duties while Rondo sits. I think Eddie does a fine job during the regular season playing the 1. As long as Ray or Paul, and Sheed/KG are out there to provide shooting Daniels should be okay too.

I’d still like a veteran PG to come in and be our 15th roster slot. Ideally they’d be good enough to win minutes to give the C’s a more typical rotation. But I doubt any of the current FAs out there are good enough.

by Fafnir on Aug 11, 2009 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

that's what Ainge's comments today seem to indicate

and that bugs me

but oh well

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Aug 11, 2009 5:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

What you see is what we'll get, at least to

start the season. A FA signing counts as double salary due to the lux tax. So, a $1.3mill Jason Williams (or Ty Lue, or A. Carter or Marbury) is really $2.6mill. I seriously doubt the Ainge is authorized to spend that on a backup PG who would be the TENTH man in the rotation (see Fafnir’s post above).

I think the team goes into the season with the current roster (give or take Hudson) and Doc makes a go of it. Then when the trade deadline approaches the Scal/TA contracts are dangled for another player for the playoff push.

by Surferdad on Aug 11, 2009 7:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

They were playing Gabe at the 2guard a little bit

so maybe Danny meant Marquis would be logging most of the minutes for Paul AND for Ray when Eddie isn’t playing the 2.

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Aug 11, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why not wait?

With all the points coming in from the draft maybe someone becomes available.

by B-ball on Aug 10, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm still hoping we get into the Jason Williams mix

I think he can fit in here, not to mention another vet with championship experience.

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Aug 11, 2009 12:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Cosign 100%

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Aug 11, 2009 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

something tells me,J dub didnt come out of retirement to play for the vet minimum lol

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Aug 11, 2009 2:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

While signing Lester Hudson isn’t a given, I’m assuming he’ll be given some kind of shot. So that leaves a trade situation to bring in a point guard. Who are the players that would be included in a trade?

TA, JR, Walker, and Scal most likely. So which of these would teams take? I don’t see Danny trading both JR and Walker, so that leaves three. For potential there’s JR or Walker, and for money, there’s TA and Scal.

It’s all confusing. I think Danny was being honest with the acquisition of Daniels regarding the status of Gabe. I think Daniels is the back up one; and either JR or Walker will be playing behind Paul with limited minutes, and Daniels rotating between the one and three positions. I don’t think we pick up a point guard unless someone is willing to take TA, and/or the tandem of Daniels and House do not work out as the one and two. The latter scenario would suggest then a mid season pick up.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 11, 2009 12:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Honestly . . .

not a clue. It’s a point guard rich league now. Throw a dart at a board. Two months ago I would have bet good money that TA would be traded this summer. I never would have figured that Gabe would be let go. If nothing else Gabe was insurance.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 11, 2009 4:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lester Hudson

I think that’s why Gabe was let go.

by Tai on Aug 11, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Trade Possibility

Like it or not I think we’ll see some TA at the wing spot backing up Ray/PP with Daniel’s playing both the wing and backup PG. TA has had injuries besides the off court issues and teams are going to want to see him playing before they might be willing to take a chance on him. If he produces he’ll be a valuable chip, if not his only value maybe as an expiring contract.

One of the problems with bringing in a Lue, Vaughn, or Knight is that you are playing 2 midgets in the backcourt , when teamed with Eddie – remember us getting smoked by Walter Herman in the Detroit game. IMO, the backup PG needs to have some size – someone like Antonio Daniels might be a good fit with Eddie. I believe that when Eddie is on the court we are going to see Ray, PP or Daniels either be the primary ball handler or helping to get us into our offense, especially if a team presses.

I really don’t have a problem with this arrangement. Rondo will and can play a lot of minutes due to his youth, the only problem would be if he get injured then we’d be in a world of hurt. However in today environment you can’t plan for all contingencies, there’s only so much money available. I can see us signing Hudson and giving him some PG minitues. But I can see us not signing Hudson (leaving a roster spot vacant) basically forcing or pushing him to sign with a team in Europe for a year to see how he handles the higher level of competition.

And if ithe pg situation is not working out during the regular season then Danny works a trade at the deadline or find someone who is waived or bought out. The one thing I’d like to stay away from is bringing in someone who hasn’t played in a year – ala Marbury.

by badax33 on Aug 11, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ideal is to pick up a guy with some size, yes, but I think if you pick up someone like Ty Lue, it’s mostly as a “break-glass-in-case-of-emergency” player. If Rondo gets hurt, someone who can either start ahead of Eddie or be the backup behind him, not someone who would be playing alongside Eddie a lot. Alternatively, Eddie comes in for Ray Allen (who also needs rest this year at least as much as PP) and plays alongside Rondo, then Ty Lue (or the equivalent) plays alongside Daniels or Ray Allen in the backcourt.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

im still counting on marbury to come back

give a full time training camp who knows what he will bring back? was not there some rumor that hes got an offer from ainge?

by aeternus on Aug 11, 2009 3:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Jason Williams in supporting role

Give Williams half of the Job and Daniels the other. I think Williams has great experience and abilities still in his old Bones and if Daniels fits with the PG-Position give him 6th man minutes & he will get the award at the end of the season! :-)

I asked god and he said: L.A. will lose again next year!! ^_°

by greenmech on Aug 11, 2009 4:43 AM EDT reply actions  

I want to see Hudson stick and don't really go for Jeff's vet PGs.

If we’re bringing a vet pg in now, it better be through a trade so we have the room and get a better player. More likely, that doesn’t happen until midseason.

by clover on Aug 11, 2009 5:02 AM EDT reply actions  

None of them are plausible options

Robinson and Sessions are both restricted free agents and Boston has already burned its MLE, so they can’t throw enough money at either that New York or Milwaukee wouldn’t be willing to match (and Robinson and Sessions wouldn’t even sign Boston’s offer sheet for the same reason).

Iverson has made it clear that he 1) wants to start 2) wants a major role in the offense. If he had indicated that he was willing to subsume his personality for the sake of the team and become a bench energizer and scorer on a contender, then he would have been signed already. No one wants to deal with him at the moment; Miami is probably the frontrunner to sign him at this point.

To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.

by Ben R on Aug 11, 2009 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not to get off track, but at least AI is honest

You may not like his selfish attitude, but there’s no hidden agenda with that guy. Personally, I’d like to see him on Memphis where he could be a big fish in a small pond.

by Surferdad on Aug 11, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can’t we at least test the waters? Throw a small contract at Sessions? Worst case scenario, they match the offer.

by Justin_Bobo on Aug 11, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sessions has to agree to sign that offer sheet, and there’s absolutely no reason for him to sign anything small. He’s not going to sign an offer sheet at the vet min (which is all we have left, assuming Daniels comes via the LLE) since Milwaukee would match it in a cocaine heartbeat. Worst-case for Sessions is that he signs an offer sheet from NY for one year at the full MLE; he’s not even going to THINK about signing anything less than that.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Daniels at PG

Actually, Daniels did play some at point guard over the last few years, despite the Pacers having depth at that position. My friend, an avid Indiana fan who watched every game, describes him as a “car crash” at point.

However, he did have Jim O’Brien as a coach, which often doesn’t lend itself to good point guard play. Maybe with the right talent around him he could make it work, but it strikes me as a plan that might be OK for the regular season, but won’t fly in the playoffs. Having said that, this team won it all in 2008 with very inconsistent PG play from all concerned, but they can’t rely on being good enough for that to happen again.

by Bent on Aug 11, 2009 7:01 AM EDT reply actions  

if the team sees daniels more at point than wing..

who backs up Pierce? something tells e that bill walker will get the majority of minutes behind him : (

by celticinorlando on Aug 11, 2009 8:13 AM EDT reply actions  

I think they’ll give every chance for JR Giddens or Bill Walker to earn some playing time as the 4th wing (or 5th, depending on whether House plays the point or the off-guard). Both guys have talent, and we just need one of them to start to “get it” (seems like they both need the game to slow down for them, they both seem to play a bit out of control at times). From Danny’s recent comments, seems unlikely that we’ll be in the mix for Bruce Bowen. A trade for Mardy Collins would be nice, not a great player but a servicable backup with enough size to maybe play alongside Eddie. I’m still thinking that we’ll see a fair amount of an Eddie/Daniels backcourt before all is said and done.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 8:18 AM EDT reply actions  

so let me get this straight:

second unit:

PG Daniels
SG Eddie
SF????
PF Baby
C Sheed

looks to me as if we are back to square one with this whole “getting PP legit rest and not blowing the games doing it”…i guess i have to accept that walker/giddens/tony will be manning that wing spots for important minutes…i guess with that second unit they can hide them pretty well.

by celticinorlando on Aug 11, 2009 8:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Most teams don’t play ten-deep, though. Daniels and House are the primary backups for Rondo, Ray, and Pierce (two backups for three positions). Figure those three average ~ 32 minutes per game. That leaves 48 minutes for the backups, or 24 each for Eddie and Daniels – which sounds about right to me. I suspect Rondo will be playing more like 36-38MPG, anyway. Scal will be in the mix for a few minutes backing up PP.

Would it be nice to have another proven guy? Sure – but there’s pretty good depth right now (as long as no one gets hurt; then all bets are off). Best-bet is that they DO finally fill the backup PG spot, which lets Eddie and Daniels concentrate at the wing spots, but even if they have to pick up some of the minutes at the point there still won’t be THAT many minutes to go around.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sheldon Williams

May fill that 10th spot, or Scal.

by Justin_Bobo on Aug 11, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Scal plays this year like he did last year, Doc will find a way to get him a few minutes here and there – likely at the SF spot, since we do have so much depth up front. Still, the 10th man – whoever that is – isn’t looking at more than a few minutes per night, and better get used to seeing a fair number of DNP-CDs next to their names in the box score.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

ok but nobody can answer my question

they pull paul, ray and rondo at the same time….who plays the SF? or are we going to have ray on the floor or paul on the floor with that second unit ? like last year…i.e:

PG eddie Daniels
SG ray eddie
SF daniels pierce
PF baby baby
C sheed sheed

i thought the team said a legit back up for PP was the most important thing this summer…i just have a feeling daniels is going to be more of a guard than a SF and that bill walker/tony/giddens will get the bulk of the minutes behind pierce

by celticinorlando on Aug 11, 2009 8:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Either Ray or Paul will be on the floor at virtually all times. I don’t think we see too many of the “hockey lines”-type subsitutions that Doc was doing a few years ago. If you’ve got Ray or Paul on the court, that also alleviates some of the pressure on Daniels/House to run the offense, since both guys have experience initiating the offense themselves from the wing positions.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Also, if Doc did want to substitute the 3,2,1 at the same time, you’d probably see a lineup like:

SF: Daniels
SG: Tony
PG: House

With Eddie defending opposing point guards, but Daniels playing “point forward” on offense. I agree, though, that Doc isn’t going to make mass 5-for-5 substitutions with his bench. Even last year, he almost always kept on of Ray and Pierce in the game.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Aug 11, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just check the amount of time such a unit was employed

If you look at the amount of time that neither Rondo, R. Allen, or Pierce were on the floor last season (especially if you look at the playoffs) then you will see that such a lineup was exceedingly rare. Since it is utilized so infrequently – we can live with it.

by ManiacPDN on Aug 11, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree with Surferdad

Let’s assume Ainge believes that a 2nd unit back court of Daniels and Eddie is workable even though neither are pure PGs. Then we are talking about a 3rd string PG who will be number 10-12 on the active roster. Not a lot of minutes there and Lester Hudson may be the game plan until mid season dumpings. Because Ainge may have figured that mid season availble talent – faceless and nameless at this point – is a better risk than Jason Williams , for ex, who will cost double given the luxury tax. Jason Williams, by the way, played “matador defense” (shout out to Tommy) the last time I saw him.

by Wildblu1 on Aug 11, 2009 9:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Amen, and thanks. This is not rocket science

By the time the fifth starter needs a rest, one of Pierce or Allen will be back on the floor.

by Surferdad on Aug 11, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

and as soon as Rondo turns an ankle

Pierce is back to playing 40 minute games

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Aug 11, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

my thoughts exactly...i don't like the idea of ray or paul always

having to be on the court at all times…i don’t expect a hockey line change but that strategy wore both of them out last season. i still would like to see a legit PG on this team so daniels can play the majority of his minutes at the SF…

PG
Eddie
Daniels
Baby
Sheed

by celticinorlando on Aug 11, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I suspect they don’t fill that roster spot until training camp. They’ll see how Daniels does as a quasi-point when they start playing the preseason games; if they do decide they need an upgrade, you can just as easily make a trade for a Mardy Collins-type in a couple of months as you can now.

They’ll go into camp with 14 guaranteed contracts and with Hudson and one or two others (Swift? less likely after the Williams signing, but still a possibility) competing for the last spot on the roster. Unless, of course, they can figure out how to unload Tony Allen without getting any dead bodies in return; if they can, then maybe they go after a Ty Lue-type for the end of the roster, but I really think they go into camp with one free roster spot.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 10:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Eddie House

I’ve been advocating going the Eddie House route. Even when Cassell and Marbury were here, House still got run at the PG spot. And as much as I hated it at times, what he gave with shooting often made up for other deficiencies.

Plus, I really don’t see how we’re going to “run Rondo into the ground” by playing him a lot of minutes. What exactly constitutes a lot of minutes? I think someone his age should have no problem playing 36-38 mpg in the regular season. And if he does that, that’d limit House’s minutes to 10-12 mpg and probably fewer in the playoffs.

I think we can get by with that.

That’s not to say I wouldn’t like Jason Williams or Bobby Jackson; I would. But I don’t think it’s do or die.

by Jon on Aug 11, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

No offense Jon

But in my opinion I’m not sure how anyone who watches the Celtics regularly could be satisfied with House running the point. Eddie’s scoring suffers DRAMATICALLY when he has to be PG because he is simply unable to create his shot off the dribble. Hell, Ray would be a better scoring option at the point, at least he can shoot off the dribble occasionally. House is a decent ballhandler and a below-average passer whose scoring drops precipitously when he plays the one. If Danny goes into the season with him as the second option, I’d be very disappointed. I definitely don’t think we need to make a big splash at backup PG, but we should bring in SOMEONE before camp.

by joebianca on Aug 11, 2009 11:02 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

The simple fact that they’ve been actively looking to improve the backup PG spot in each of the past two seasons – first with Cassell, then with Starbury – ought to tell us what we need to know about how Danny views Eddie Money. I still think it’s most likely they go into camp with a free roster spot and let Hudson/Swift/another camp-invite player fight it out, but if they do make a small trade or they do make another small FA signing, it’ll be to add depth to the PG rotation.

It is valid; we have depth at all other spots except behind Rondo. If Perk’s shoulder acts up, ‘Sheed goes in the starting rotation. If KG’s knee is hurt, same deal – plus we have BBD back. Even if we lose Pierce or Ray for a short period, we’ve got Daniels and Eddie who can step up (and maybe Scal).

We don’t really have anyone behind Rondo, and that has to be a concern.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

eddie is a spot up shooter. he is not a fulltime PG

he is much better with someone else bringing the ball up

by celticinorlando on Aug 11, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

The problem is its a catch 22 for the team and whoever they bring in

They don’t need a PG for regular minutes, they have a rotation of: Perk, KG, Pierce, Ray, Rondo, Sheed, Daniels, House, Baby – that’s 9 guys that will get all the minutes unless there is a blowout. In case of a blowout, Hudson is fine.

The risk is if one of these guys got ejected or injured for an extended period of time: Rondo, Ray, Pierce, Daniels, House.

If its anyone but Rondo or Daniels, my guess is you see Tony Allen pushed up. If Rondo or Daniels go down you are back to last year, where the second unit is short a ball handler. If this is a one week thing, the team can get through it. If this is a one month thing, or happens during the playoffs, the team is going to be in trouble.

But here’s the hard part, an actual good PG won’t want to sign here. They aren’t going to crack the rotation, they are going to ride the pine. Assume Starbury was playing at closer to average level and looking for a one year deal to show everyone in the league. The C’s are a bad fit, even more so, because Daniels is not a shooter, they need to think long and hard about bringing in a PG that can’t hit the 3 pt shot.

If CLE wasn’t such a rival, a House for West deal (plus whatever filler was needed) would make sense IMO. I see House as a better pure shooter, which should be more useful to CLE with James on ball so much, and West’s better height and passability as a ball handler would allow him to play next to Rondo or Ray Allen and also be the insurance policy.

As it is I think the C’s should look for a veteran they are comfortable starting for a week if Rondo goes down, with the understandning that they will have to trade or sign someone if Rondo goes down for a month or more. This means a lower caliber of player, but its a better idea since the team would fit together better. (And not for nothing, but much like KG last year, if Rondo goes down for a long period of time the team is probably sunk anyways – there is just not anyone you can sign to be an adequate backup for Rondo.)

by Brendan on Aug 11, 2009 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Bobby Jackson!

He’s experienced from the Sacremento, LA rivalry. He knows Dfish inside and out! Get him for this year so we can win him a chip so he can retire/fade away happily like Cassell did. Get him Danny!

by jfarias on Aug 11, 2009 11:05 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

… except that Danny also spoke specifically about “no more old guys….” In the end, both the Cassell and Starbury experiments were somewhat disappointing, both won us one or two games but really weren’t quite good enough.

Not sure what that leaves for options, though.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Expensive. Would you rather have him for one year at the MLEx2 (figuring luxury tax, ~$10M – $11M) or someone like Ty Lue or Anthony Carter for one year at the vet min x 2 (figure $2.5M)?

To make a trade happen, you’d likely be looking at Scal + Tony Allen + one of the kids. That cuts into the net salary effect, and I’m happy to help pack Tony’s bags, but I’d hate to lose Scal (depth at multiple positions and a great teammate) and I’d hate to needlessly give up on Giddens/Walker.

Heard rumblings that Duhon might not be a happy camper in a limited-minutes role. Would also depend on whether NY is able to get Sessions, in which case Duhon would be expendable.

by theBird on Aug 11, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

61% no I love boston fans.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Aug 11, 2009 11:25 AM EDT reply actions  

62 and rising.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Aug 11, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brevin Knight

Brevin Knight is the guy they should sign. He might have a little bit left in the tank.

by Greenteam'76 on Aug 11, 2009 11:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Completely agree. I’m with those of you who suggested Bobby Jackson. Ronnie Price would be a really good option, too.

by Vittorio De Zen on Aug 11, 2009 2:02 PM EDT reply actions  

How about Demarcus Nelson?

With house and Daniels able to man the spot in short periods and wing players like TA, Walker and Giddens to back up PP and Ray Allen he could be a viable option. I think undrafted D-leaguers are cheaper option at the paint. He has played and started at the point guard position in the past. He also fits the defense first mindset of a point guard that the Celtics need. He was a two time all defense team member. He has good size for a point guard at 6’4". He can also guard 2 guard when he is paired with House. He is a little bit turnover prone but hopefully he can overcome that with the slowed down offense that the celtics play.

by tidiespi64 on Aug 11, 2009 9:35 PM EDT reply actions  

A good veteran pg for small money. I suggest Jason Hart. Lifetime stats
are 15.7mpg-.417fg%-.315 3p%-.788 ft% 2.3a/.8to-1.7reb-4.8ppg.
Started last year when Baron Davis was injured. Solid back up and 31 years old.

by jacigar on Aug 12, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

For all of the worry warts (and experts) who apparently think that they know more about what it takes to build a winning basketball team than GM Danny Ainge, here is some food for thought.
Cousy was a great PG and K.C. Jones certainly got the job done. But after K.C. the only effective true point guard to play significant minutes the Celts have had prior to Rondo’s arrival was Tiny Archibald.
Who was starting at PG, much less coming off the bench, when Boston won the following six titles:
…67-68: Hustling Larry Siegfried (?) 4.7 apg (.149 apm);
…68-69: Still Hustling Siegfried (?) 4.7 apg (.145 apm);
…73-74: Shoot First Jo Jo White (?) 5.5 apg (.138 apm);
…75-76: Still Shooting Jo Jo (?) 5.4 apg (.137 apm);
…83-84: Half-Court Passer Johnson (?) 4.2 apg (.127 apm);
…85-86: Great Half-Courter Johnson (?) 5.8 apg (.167 apm).
Siegfried, White, and Johnson were versatile multi-talented guards; all three proving with two titles each, that it is how all the pieces fit and compliment the total team effort that actually matters. Ainge should know, he experienced this first hand (e.g. 85-86).
With Eddie House shooting at one end and guarding the shorter of the opponents’ guards at the other, while Marquis Daniels guards the taller opposing guard at one end and runs the point at the other is going to work out fine. And keep in mind that we are talking here about second units.
Working together with the whole team from training camp through the entire regular season is going to make a big difference and will throw playoff opponents for a loop with little time for them to adjust.

by RayWestNC on Aug 15, 2009 12:01 AM EDT reply actions  

House 1.6apg (.093apm) Daniels 2.1apg (.089apm)
Current combo guards Hinrich 6.1apg (.179) Delonte West 4.6apg (.134apm) Jason Hart 2.3apg (.146) . These numbers explain why many of us dont believe that House or Daniels fits the bill at the (g) spot. INMO
DA also thinks this way . Thats why he got Payton, Marbury and Cassell.

by jacigar on Aug 18, 2009 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Gasol, Deron, or Have Faith In Rondo?
Small
Celtics' vibe
Small
This Team is Complete Garbage
Small
Frustrations..
Small
Rondo and back to backs
Small
Steve Kerr on Rondo's jump shot: "It gets frustrating for the Celtics"
Small
Debunking The "Build around Rondo" Myth
Small
What's up with Phoenix? Is a trade brewing?
Small
Look to Denver
Small
my turn on rondo..

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi