Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Leon Signs With Cavs

We'll miss you Leon.

ESPN Reports:

There were a half-dozen playoff caliber teams willing to sign Leon Powe and wait for his surgically reconstructed left knee to heal, but the forward who had been such a big hit in Boston ultimately decided he wanted to team up with an old AAU buddy -- LeBron James.

Powe traveled to Cleveland on Tuesday to have his knee examined by Cavaliers team medical personnel, with the expectation that he will sign a two-year, $1.77 million deal Wednesday.

A source told ESPN.com that Powe will sign for the league minimum for players with three years of service -- $855,189. Cleveland will hold a team option for a second season at $915,852.

Update:  Brian Windhorst reports:

Leon Powe signing should be official in morning. 2 years, $1.77 mil. Sources say Celtics tried to re-sign him after word got out about Cavs.

Cavs are not done, they still may sign another big man w/ Powe & JJ Hickson not 100%. Joe Smith and Rob Kurz still on list.

Poll
Did the Celtics make the right call with Leon?
Yes
733 votes
No
1409 votes

2142 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 232 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well, . . .

I felt worse when Cowens signed with the Bucks, but not as bad as when Bill Sharman went to coach the Lakers.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 11, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

right there with ya buddy

the picture JC posted makes that “bad” feeling that much stronger. Love ya Leon. Hate to see you go. Thanks for everything that you gave out there. You are the best!

What did you say to me paper champion?
-Mr.T

by CaliforniaGreen on Aug 12, 2009 3:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

They picked him up dirt cheap, why we didnt sign him got no clue

"....you can't handle The Truth"

by kheeko on Aug 11, 2009 7:08 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Seeing how incredibly deep and strong our front line is now, I’d say Danny did the right thing.

Nevertheless, I’m glad to see Leon catch on with someone.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 11, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

if our front line is incredibly deep and strong

Then why couldn’t danny wait until Powe’s knee healed? Seems to me he made a decision that goes against what you’re saying…

Leon Powe’s drive never wavered, and enough teams trusted him to go after him (including us, per Jeff’s update). Not so sure about this one, amenhotep04. I think we have a nice front line, but we should have more strongly considered Powe. Look at the progress he’s made during his time in the league too. He was starting to put up some big time numbers, and got several crucial rebounds and clutch baskets. Don’t forget the layup at the end of that Sacramento game.

Full season Shelden Williams and current front line, or less than a full season of Powe and current front line? I’d go with Powe. He’d make a great inside out tandem with Sheed coming off the bunch.

by Slick on Aug 12, 2009 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fair Enough

In retrospect, yeah, with the depth we have now an argument could be made that it wouldn’t have hurt to sign Leon. At the time however that Danny talked with Leon, our front line was Perk (bad shoulder), KG (coming off surgery), and Scal (concussion waiting to happen). Three uncertainties, but only Scal’s condition probably dangerous (career threatening). I don’t fault Danny for looking into strengthening the front line. He signs Sheed, BBD, and Williams. With the mindset of winning now, what is Danny supposed to do? Currently if we sign Hudson we’re at 15 players, and that’s after letting Gabe walk. Danny can’t give away TA. Nobody wants him. It was a risk on Danny’s part, but we’ve got the deepest front line we’ve had in well over 20 years now. Why not celebrate that?

People need to remember all the complaining of the second unit of Leon and BBD getting burned early last season due to lack of height. There were huge discussions about who we were going to keep when the season was over. Everyone pretty much knew we were only going to keep one. When Leon blew out his knee, the decision was made, and it was even talked about on here.

I find it odd that a discussion on this topic that was so popular throughout much of the season is now some huge tragedy.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 12, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can't help but agree

There was a time, right here on this blog, that the “voters” were split between keeping BBD or Leon. Personally, my vote was for keeping Leon.

It seems that many of the BBD supporters (who now have him under contract) have shifted their emotions towards Leon. I’m ok with all of it but it’s the hating that bothers me a bit.

Leon didn’t sign with Cleveland to “get back at” the Celtics. He signed with them because they offered him a chance to have a job. Remember who gave him his REAL chance, late in the 2nd round a few years ago? Yeah, that’s right. Danny Ainge and the Boston Celtics.

Wishing you the best Leon, but I’m not worried about you coming back to “haunt” us. I hope your knee heals to the point that you can continue to earn a paycheck in the NBA, whatever the location, be it Cleveland or Boston.

by DrD on Aug 12, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

The amount of “hating” is directly proportional to the amount of unreasonable fanaticism that is being shown. It’s like there’s a fairly good song, that suddenly gets very popular with all its fangirls and crap. Don’t you just simply start hating the song?

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Remember who gave him his REAL chance, late in the 2nd round a few years ago? Yeah, that’s right. Danny Ainge and the Boston Celtics.

Actually, it was the Nuggets that drafted him.

by MattD on Aug 12, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

They picked for the Celtics… that’s usually how it works, considering that he was traded right after.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

True

Good point. I just didn’t like the whole we “gave him his REAL chance” phrasing, it struck a nerve; Powe gave himself a chance, with his play in college and his play on our summer league team, which led to the C’s offering him a contract.

I actually agree with DrD otherwise, I haven’t seen anything to suggest Leon signed with the Cavs to “get back” at the Celtics, it was simply going to a place that expressed an interest in him, that fit his playing style, and that had a good chance to be winners. Good for him. As a Boston fan, I’m used to being able to root for former Boston players now on other teams, while rooting against their new teams.

by MattD on Aug 12, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sheldon will be able to contribute more *this* year than Leon could...

and this year is our best chance to win a title. Our Big 3 are really long in the tooth as basketball players go. So is Sheed. We need guys who will give us the best chance to win this year. Leon, coming back from his 3rd ACL injury, who won’t even play until the all-star break, and most probably won’t return to his former level of play until at least next season (if ever), won’t give us what Shelden will this season. If Leon comes back to play like he did pre-most-recent-injury, he could be better than Shelden in the long run, but for this season, Danny did the smart thing.

I think we all Iove Leon’s grit and determination, but this was a pure basketball decision, and Danny made the right call.

by Mencius on Aug 12, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agreee. Good basketball move, and I voted yes on the poll.

Going to have to see it to believe that Leon can remain a credible NBA player with Namath knees.

by CoachBo on Aug 12, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Unclear

Shelden will contribute more during the regular season. But Leon might contribute more during the postseason. Given that the Celtics are a lock to make the playoffs with or without Powe on the roster, having the better playoff performer should be the priority. That might be Williams, but it might also be Powe.

by dslack on Aug 12, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

3 man rotation

I don’t think big baby will see much time in the playoff unless he is really faster than last year and that is what is needed.
There isn’t much that leon could bring that we Perk and Wallace can’t with a good 2+inch

by aboubata on Aug 12, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Powe is better in the post

Powe is a much better offensive rebounder than Wallace. Sheed has some decent post moves, but he rarely plays down low. Powe draws fouls much more often than Wallace does. Powe scores much more efficiently. There are definitely situations in which Powe would be the better option.

by dslack on Aug 12, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

too bad

I’ll miss Leon — his heart, and his hustle, his team spirit. I wish he wouldn’t try to get back at the C’s … it certainly wasn’t the fault of his teammates and fans that he’s gone.

by rocknrollforyoursoul on Aug 11, 2009 7:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Try to get back at the Celtics?

Maybe he wanted to be with his friend LeBron. Maybe he wanted to be on a good team — the Cavs had the best record in the regular season last year, and arguably improved this summer by adding Shaq and Parker and not losing anyone important. At least he didn’t sign with the Lakers.

Prediction: This loss will come back to haunt the Celtics. I’m happy for Leon’s sake, but I think Ainge handled this horribly. I think it’s very likely that whoever takes the 15th roster spot will do less over the next 2 years than Powe will.

by dslack on Aug 11, 2009 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

The Celts are not a good team? Huh?

No, this will come back to haunt Leon.
Two words: “Marián Hossa”.

by Amager Celtic Fan on Aug 12, 2009 2:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your point?

Yes, the Celtics are a good team. They are a good team that had already told him that they didn’t want him. Seems totally reasonable for him to want to go to another team as a result. My point is just that his specific choice of which other team doesn’t have anything to do with the Celtics, so far as I can tell anyway.

by dslack on Aug 12, 2009 5:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

And another thing...

Why are you mentioning some random hockey player?

by dslack on Aug 12, 2009 5:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Marian Hossa...not totally random.. but close

Marian Hossa left the Penguins the year after they lost in the championship to the eventual winners, Detroit…. when the Pens met Det. again the next year in the championship, the Pens came out winners… and Hossa completely disappeared… the situations b/w Powe and Hossa are not quite the same… Pitts. wanted Hossa back at big money, but he left for less $$ to sign with whom he thought were going to be sure bets…. and he was wrong… anyways, Powe wanted to be here, the Celts made the decision to send him packing… and hopefully we don’t end up being wrong….

by EnviroCaper on Aug 12, 2009 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you.

I haven’t followed hockey in a decade.

by dslack on Aug 12, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bad Feeling

that this is going to come back and haunt us later on down the road. Best of luck Leon. Good player, and great human being!

by Scribbles on Aug 11, 2009 7:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed.This is going to come back and bite the Celtics extremely hard in the ass.

And Im going to cry when is happens.
Leon Powe for Sheldon Williams. SIGH

by Marqui on Aug 11, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

If they pick up someone better...

I agree. Powe for Sheldon does not make any sense to me. If they picked up a seven footer – maybe. But knee or no knee this seems like a downgrade to me on many levels

by Staubach on Aug 11, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

I said once we let him go, fans shouldn’t expect him to be around come February – why people kept assuming he would be back in green come the deadline is still beyond me. DA dropped the ball on this one IMO.

Whatever, I’m HAPPY for Leon. I’m glad he’s signed somewhere. Unfortunately, for the C’s and fans, he’s now got a chip on his shoulder in regards to us. Come playoff time, we’re in for a showdown.

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Aug 11, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Remember when...

Powe scored 21 points IN LA….. IN THE FINALS?

Remember that Danny? Sheldin freaking Williams? Seriously?

by Nut from NH on Aug 11, 2009 7:15 PM EDT reply actions  

1/2 season at best...

of Leon “Fourth Times the Charm” Powe?

Seriously?

You think Doc would actually have given him meaningful minutes, ever?

Seriously?

No disrespect Nut, but….Seriously?

9 + 20 + 34 + 5 + 43 = 17

by Rondo'd on Aug 11, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course, serious, dead serious. DA screwed up big ths time.

If he could gamble on Mikki, he should at least give Leon an offer.

by 33-32-00 on Aug 12, 2009 4:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

maybe he’s done gambling. making safe logical choices now. premeditated season

What did you say to me paper champion?
-Mr.T

by CaliforniaGreen on Aug 12, 2009 4:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

At least Mikki was healthy

when we got him, no matter how bad he played. Same for Shelden; and Shelden will be able to do training camp, preseason, and be situated come the season opener.

I know why we should’ve kept Powe, but don’t make it sound like DA completely screwed up. Our bench players are House, Daniels, Scal, BBD, Williams, and Wallace. Not even including TA, Giddens, and Walker, that’s six solid rotation men.

The only way to know for sure if DA screwed up at this point is if Powe outshines Williams in the postseason, or even the regular season. That’s it. Nothing else will validate or invalidate what DA did.

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

From the very start Powe was told he wasn't coming back

Danny didn’t even CONSIDER bringing him back. I’m dumbfounded and vaclemped.

by Nut from NH on Aug 11, 2009 7:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I woulda loved to see him back too, but DA has seen a lot of knee injuries to a lot of players over the years and I have got to give him the benefit of the doubt there. If he thought Powe would be back on point come June, he’d probably a signed him.

by D Dub on Aug 11, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Leon was our most efficient low post scorer in years. I dont know if his knees will allow him to play, but he must have been disappointed that the Celts didnt even want to take a chance on him when the Cavs were willing to risk it. If he gets to play against us, you will be sure he will give 500% to beat us. Ill laugh my bejezzus off if he helps the Cavs beat us. Sometimes Danny leaves me wondering – but of course I havent walked 20 miles in his moccassins.

by Reyquila on Aug 11, 2009 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I can smell his moccassins Reyquila!!!

and these shoes stink…..the way he handled this whole affair stunk up the Boston Garden….he showed Powe no respect and I am glad for Leon. Keep fighting the good fight Leon!!

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Aug 11, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you forget Jefferson?

Jefferson was much better than Powe in the post, so I don’t agree.

It is sad that he lost so much money due to the knee injury. It really cost him.

by guava_wrench on Aug 11, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Business is business...

but Leon decided to take this personally. Nevermind the C’s were the only team willing to take a chance on him in the draft.

I may be in the minority here, but I just can’t see Leon Powe being the X-Factor in the playoffs..
>>How’s he gonna get a shot off with the length we have up front?
>>How’s he gonna go off for 10 boards?
>>Is he really gonna want to take all those charges now that his career depends on his re-re-repaired knees?

Not to mention…
>>His game will change
>>He won’t really know the system
>>He won’t be able to earn a rotation spot easily
>>He’s gotta do “his thing” with Z and Shaq, and that Dunk-Gate guy in the way.

Tough, tough spot for ol’Leon.

9 + 20 + 34 + 5 + 43 = 17

by Rondo'd on Aug 11, 2009 7:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Try

Please dispute my points. Really, if I’m miscalculated something I’ll listen. Maybe NEXT season Leon can be a difference for the Cavs, but not this year.

9 + 20 + 34 + 5 + 43 = 17

by Rondo'd on Aug 11, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Completely disagree with you.

This guy has a passion and work ethic not many players have. I don’t doubt he’ll work his butt off to get back on the court. If you can’t acknowledge that, you must not have been watching the last few seasons. Leon’s a scrapper – with championship experience. If he couldn’t come back and be a factor, then why did the Cavs sign him? Why were the Lakers, Spurs, Magic, and Trailblazers (all playoff caliber teams) show interest in signing him?

Don’t be a bitter fan. He wanted to be here, we didn’t want him so he moved on. Remember, “this is a business.”

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Aug 11, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm a Celtic Fan

Who grew up on the nasty 80s. Suffered, let me repeat Suffered at the hands of Rick “The Franchise Killer” Pitino for a decade, only to see new light the past few years. I watched a championship CELTIC team win one year ago. I almost saw another this year (maybe). I’m excited. I’m cocky. I’m walking around with a green “C” on my chest, daring someone to beat my team. I’m telling everyone who will listen, and those that won’t that the Celtics are the best team. Period. And yes, when a player who was shown the good graces of the gods of the best franchise in basketball gets petty when he gets seriously hurt and signs with a top competitor, I have no sympathy. No empathy. He is now the enemy, and I will treat him as such.

This is not just a business. This is the Boston Celtics.

Ok, so that was over the top, but my point is I’m not just a fan…I’m a fanatic.

9 + 20 + 34 + 5 + 43 = 17

by Rondo'd on Aug 11, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gets petty?

How did Leon get petty?

The Celtics told him to take a hike. So he signed with a team that wanted him. A team that happens to have a good chance of being the best team in the league next year, with one of the most fun teammates to play with (LeBron). Sounds like a good option to me. Where’s the pettiness?

by dslack on Aug 11, 2009 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Too tired tonight but maybe at some point

But IF he fails to perform or can’t return and contribute I will come in here and say I was wrong and ignorant. But what I will not do is change my mind in how DA treated Leon Powe. You could tell by Powe response in the press that he felt betrayed because DA failed to sit down with him and explain the situation and his thinking – he at least deserved that.

DA has a history of this type of poor communication skills and it stinks for a GM. Now if Leon comes in for the Cavs and produces some solid minutes off the bench when he heals, then trust me when I say this!!!!! – I will go back and research every single person in here who quickly wrote him off with no margin for error in their own poor judgement and ask them personally for a similar admission of ignorance and quick judgement.

Peace

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Aug 11, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, Master Po

I don’t agree with you about the lunar landing, but I do about just about everything basketball-related.

by dslack on Aug 11, 2009 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh

Good point dslack.

And I agree with Master Po one-hundred percent on Powe. At a personal level, I’m very much turned off by what the Celtics management has done this season in regards to Powe (and, for that matter, what they’ve done in regards to comments on Rondo).

But, more importantly, I’m sorta shocked, on a more public and/or professional level, that they ended up letting Powe go. Sure, he has serious health issues—none of which it seems, kept many of our competitors from looking very closely at him and extending him an offer.

All those people around here who were so quick to pipe up that the NBA is just a business when Powe wasn’t given a qualifying offer by DA should remember that chickens come home to roost. I’m not happy that Powe is now a Cav, but I’m certainly happy is being appreciated, at least by someone, for the great contributor that he is.

Our loss.

by grnpeak on Aug 12, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, now that LBJ is supposedly going to be playing PF, Leon will hardly get to play even if he IS healthy…

by D Dub on Aug 11, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

lebron was, is and will be a small forward

varejao is their starting PF, backed up by jamario moon and eventually, gulp, leon powe.

by hooray on Aug 12, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

TonyAllen101

We learned a lesson from Tony Allen. I think Ainge knows what he is doing. Powe was a great Celtic but it is business. I sometimes wish I would use his trade value before the deadline.

by GreenGrizz on Aug 11, 2009 7:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Hes just another cav now..

Can’t wait to kick his ass in the playoffs! Go C’s!

by jfarias on Aug 11, 2009 7:35 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

dido that

can’t wait to kick his ass 2

by priapus81 on Aug 11, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wish the best of luck to you Leon...

but of course not against the C’s… Can’t wait to play you in the playoffs and kick your team’s ass!

by Mike-Dub on Aug 12, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

very sad news for me

I miss Leon already although I’m glad he got a contract somewhere. I just wish he’d signed with a team I didn’t hold such contempt for or at least joined the Suns where I could be reassured his rehab would be in excellent hands sigh.
I hope he has a great (but championship-less sorry Leon) career in Cleveland.

by twinbree on Aug 11, 2009 7:35 PM EDT reply actions  

love Leon but

what’s the history of guys with twice-torn ACLs? Anyone know of any examples?

by Cannoneo on Aug 11, 2009 7:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Didn't McDyess have 2 torn-ACLs?

Sure, he’s still playing. Sure, he’s still a good guy to have around. BUT….he was a STUD before his knee problems, and he turned into a shell of himself. He is a jumpshooter and average rebounder. He was a monster before that, something Leon never got the chance to be.

I don’t remember if McDyess had a jumper before, but I know Leon doesn’t now. He is going to HAVE to change his game and move more outside the paint if he wants to extend his career. That negates everything he did before – get inside, bang, grab the board, put it back, get fould on charges, and get to the line.

9 + 20 + 34 + 5 + 43 = 17

by Rondo'd on Aug 11, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm

and look at how long of career McDyess has had. He’s still and effective player. How many teams (including the Celtics) wanted him to join when he was waived last season?

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Aug 11, 2009 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

McDyess was a budding superstar and athletic freak before he went down..

Leon was a second round rotation guy. I don’t think Antonio is the best comparison. Likely without access to much athleticism, Powe will be relying on skills that thus far he has yet to show..

by BWC on Aug 11, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed BWC

I was extending an olive branch with that comparison. McDyess to Powe? That was a gimme analogy.

9 + 20 + 34 + 5 + 43 = 17

by Rondo'd on Aug 11, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

A few more:

Dejuan Blair. Sean Elliott and Hines Ward (football) played on just 1 ACL.

by dslack on Aug 11, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Celtics need rest for KG this year

They couldn’t afford to take the chance on Leon. The Cavs only went for Leon because he was basically their last option. The Celtic owners are spending obscene amounts of money on this team this year. Extreme risk mitigation through the signing of a healthy Landlord was the prudent choice, if not the most popular one. Celtics chose to get a player than can help keep KG, Perk, and Sheed fresh for the playoffs from day one. The Celtics can’t afford to take a flyer on a guy who will likely never to return to what he was..

by BWC on Aug 11, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

their last option??

umm i’m pretty sure the cavs aren’t pinning their hopes on leon’s knee. there were a number of options out there – they took a risk with very little downside. and from the looks of it, they make yet another move, so i wouldn’t say leon was their last option.

by hooray on Aug 12, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Drag...

although, I wish him the best.

by B-ball on Aug 11, 2009 7:47 PM EDT reply actions  

The Cs deserve this.

It was a poor business decision to let such a quality player go over such a small contract, so they deserve getting bitten by the LeBrons.

by IdahoGreen on Aug 11, 2009 7:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Unfortunately you’re right.

by Marqui on Aug 11, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow

a poor business decision? we are basically replacing powe’s spot in the rotation with Big Baby, and not Shelden williams. a poor business decision is to give a guy with no kneecaps that is 6’7" and who still doesn’t know the defensive rotations a contract purely out of generosity.

by jdpapa3 on Aug 12, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

funny how now that he's a cav, he wasn't a quality player

he was the 6th man on our championship squad. the guy was a big time offensive rebounder, maybe our best, and a gritty offensive garbageman. if he’s healthy, he gets paid and big baby takes a hike.
BUT… now that we passed on him, and a rival team picked him up, he’s a scrub???

by hooray on Aug 12, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Talk about making stuff up.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't just look at the contract figure

Think of the opportunity cost too. It’s huge. A 10-min a night guy like Landlord can cut KG’s minutes by a 1/3.

by BWC on Aug 11, 2009 7:59 PM EDT reply actions  

KARMA

Standing up for the little People

PS: I am actually from Boston.

by Champzilla on Aug 11, 2009 8:35 PM EDT reply actions  

do you think they’ll trade him back to us? maybe fot TA or Scal?!
:)

by cons on Aug 11, 2009 8:47 PM EDT reply actions  

One would think that Powe was an all-star talent. He sucked 2 seasons ago during the playoffs. He played better last year, but became quite the blackhole on offense.

There’s nothing to regret here. Bye Powe, it was nice having you, but this year in particular we’re better without you. Shelden is a great replacement for him, we got Sheed, and kept Baby.

So can we stop crying now and go win us a ’ship?

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 11, 2009 8:52 PM EDT reply actions  

you're right

he really sucked during game 2 of the finals.

by hooray on Aug 12, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lol, I love how every Powe supporter just loves throwing that game around. How about when he couldn’t hold on to his spot in the rotation during pretty much the entire playoffs? How about when we started to give PJ Brown playing time over him when he was clearly rusty. How about when Doc was forced at times to use a 3-man rotation of KG-Perk-Brown at times because Powe and Davis sucked during the playoffs?

Hardly the 6th man you’re claiming he was with our championship squad. That claim is completely inaccurate and hilarious.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm as much a Leon lover as anyone,

but I think there’s little corroboration needed for Bud’s assertion regarding this “sixth man” claim. Look at the minutes, watch the game tapes…that simply wasn’t the case.

-sw

"I didn't go there with the intentions of getting ejected. I went there with the intentions of just telling Kobe, 'You got to relax. You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?'" -Ron Artest, 05.06.09

by Steve Weinman on Aug 12, 2009 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Time will tell....

Only time will tell if it’s a mistake. Powe may never play again or he may get back to were he was. I wish him the best and the Cavs the worst.

by liamail on Aug 11, 2009 8:53 PM EDT reply actions  

We'll miss you Leon

He was the epitome of a Celtic player during his time here. But like many before him, he has moved on. I wish him well, except when he plays against us. He deserves a long and lucrative career – if anyone does, he does.

I frankly don’t care what moves Cleveland or any other team makes. I only care about the moves we make, and I think we did damn well this offseason. Perfect? No, but we are a better team than last year and the year before. Besides, “The Show” could end up being the show if LBJ decides to move on himself in another year.

I’ve always been a huge Powe fan. He helped raise #17, but it’s time to move on.

Good Luck, Leon

- JoeB

by joeb on Aug 11, 2009 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

For those of us who valued Powe's game

which wasn’t everyone here, I think it’s extremely telling that he had interest/offers from many top caliber teams. Much like his life, he creates something useful from nothing. He didn’t need to feed off other players to get his shot, and he didn’t get only the occasional rebound. Many of his points he created himself, and he forced a large number of offensive fouls on opposing star players. I’ll still root for him, b/c I thoroughly enjoyed watching him play more than several of the celtics we had the past few years.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 11, 2009 9:04 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Well said.

and I agree with you 100%.

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Aug 11, 2009 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

He had interest for the same reason Scal ended up here

Top teams see those key “behind the boxscore” or energy guys as the final piece to their championship puzzle. Scal ended up in Boston because Danny saw an opportunity to steal a high-energy, do-everything player from a top-division and conference rival – the Nets. Now, when he got here, we realized that he sure did look better on the other team than every day. Is he talented? Sure. Is he a difference maker? Maybe, but in a very limited fashion.

Last year, people wanted Posey. He was our difference maker. This year, it was Powe’s turn. If he was healthy, I’m sure Danny would have waved goodbye to BBD, since post-offense guys are harder to come by.

9 + 20 + 34 + 5 + 43 = 17

by Rondo'd on Aug 12, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

looks like Leon took this personally. Anyway, it was bittersweet.

Still hands down to DA I hope he made the right choice.

I will never root for a jersey colored red/white/blu-ish which has letters C-L-E-V-E-L-A-N-D. Whatever happens, whether it will haunt us for years or make our hate much higher to the cavs, Lebrons suck. Goodluck Leon

"Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing." - Vince Lombardi

by wild-a on Aug 11, 2009 9:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Celtics tried to re-sign him after word about the Cavs deal?

This story just keeps getting worse and worse.
What the hell were they thinking not giving him the QO?

by Marqui on Aug 11, 2009 9:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ll miss Leon, one of the hardest workers on the team and a guy with amazing character and an awesome person. The Cavs are lucky to have a guy of Leon’s caliber joining the team, for what he’ll bring them on and off the court. I wish Leon the best, and I’ll root for him in Cleveland. But when they’re playing the Celtics, not so much.

Leon and Delonte are the two members of the Cavs that I really like, and I still wish ’em both the best.

by celticspride003 on Aug 11, 2009 9:46 PM EDT reply actions  

As a Cavs fan, I come in peace.

Boston, Orlando and Cleveland all made great moves this offseason. How fun will it be to watch the East this season?

by Delonte's Inferno on Aug 11, 2009 9:55 PM EDT reply actions  

The east is gonna be great this season.

Really looking forward to the start of the season.

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Aug 11, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

we will all miss leon

But the fact of the matter is that he went over to the dark side. No hard feelings. I love leon just as much as the next guy, maybe more and I’m glad he has some more financial stability. That being said when he puts on that cleveland jersey he becomes the enemy and therefore I cannot chear for him. I will certainly be loud the first time he’s introduced but after that, silence. I hope his season ends early not due to injury, but due to his team’s elimination.

by Jimmy Toscano on Aug 11, 2009 10:16 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

i do not like the cavs. i respect lebron for his immense ability, but really do not like how he has become a whiner and a big shot and i just don’t like him friend or foe. but now, the cavs have 2 of my ex c favorites, leon and delonte. this is painful. i even liked wally. mcdyess took a few years coming back from the 2nd acl- remember him on the knicks? don’t get too down on danny for powe- it’s not his money and you know the owners had an input. they are stuck with tony’s dead money and didn’t want more. leon is a gamble.

by nazzbo on Aug 11, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Send DA to communication school

and have the Tin Man give him a heart

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Aug 11, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cleveland wasn't exactly generous

with the deal they gave Leon. Two years of chump change, with the second year at the Cavs’ option isn’t something that will get Powe’s agent bragging.

I wish Leon the best. Let’s hope he barely plays this season as he rehabs, then has a breakout 2011, playing a lot of minutes on a cellar dwelling Cleveland team, minus LeBron.

by TripleOT on Aug 11, 2009 11:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Two years of Leon being able to take care of his family for a long time.

by Bench Warmer on Aug 12, 2009 3:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

i have no problem hes not a aceltic but i rather see him in any other jersey than the cavs i cantwait to playthem in the playoffs

by celtics94 on Aug 11, 2009 11:18 PM EDT reply actions  

It's a Character Issue

Leon is a person of high character. The Celtics showed less character as a franchise in letting him go. It’s not how well Leon does in Cleveland. It’s how other players view the Boston organization.

This was not Danny Ainge’s finest hour, and I predict that the callous decision to dump Powe will come back to bite the Celtics. The current management can NEVER again expect a player to show loyalty to the organization.

by Brickowski on Aug 11, 2009 11:34 PM EDT reply actions  

I think you are grossly exaggerating this. Players are aware that ALL teams are businesses.

I think they will look to the team that was built around Pierce before being bothered by a team not re-signing an injured player (who was only able to get a minimum contract with a team option for a second year also at minimum).

Perhaps if we were talking about how Portland treated Miles, I could see more merit in your argument. They tried to end his career to get insurance money and cap savings. Boston just decided not to re-sign a free agent.

by guava_wrench on Aug 11, 2009 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is It Really Just a Business?

That’s the cliche, but I don’t believe it. Players go where they think they will be treated fairly. Leon was dumped for a roster spot— for what, Lester Hudson?

Very bad decision. I repeat. It will come back to haunt them. There is no rationalizing this.

by Brickowski on Aug 12, 2009 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Worse

Sheldon Williams? I mean they could have signed Leon for two years for what Sheldon signed. Just doesn’t make sense given how good Leon has been on the court pre-injury.

by Brendan on Aug 12, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Other than we already have 6 big men on the roster. However, you can go ahead rationalize keeping an injured player all you want.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Players won't trust us...

…because we “dumped” a player who isn’t supposed to come back until mid-season, is having his 3rd knee surgery, and had microfracture surgery too?

Oh come on. If a player thought twice before joining the Celtics because of that, I have to question if he’s worth it. What you’re pretty much saying is we’re a bad organization cause we didn’t wanna take a chance on someone who’ll be out for effectively 2/3 a year.

We still have needs, don’t we? Don’t we still need a potential backup PG, or a backup wing to guard those bigger SFs, since people don’t seem to like Daniels for that role?

We have six bigs, and we’re being mean cause we didn’t want to give that last roster spot to Powe? Come on…you’re kidding yourself.

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ditto. Major overreaction. Players will understand the odds against a player with major knee issues, and they will move on. Fans who invest loyalty in players will not.

by CoachBo on Aug 12, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess that’s why Sheed decided to sign with us and Daniels for just the LLE.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

hahahahhahahahah

is this a completely serious post?

by jdpapa3 on Aug 12, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well said, the big picture DOES matter

Perception is important, and with the contracts given in previous years to non-players, this won’t help the Celtics’ in any way…

by nba is the worst on Aug 12, 2009 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

yea

when shaun livingston got injured and the clippers let him go, players like baron davis just didn’t want to go there…oh wait

by jdpapa3 on Aug 12, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

dumbfounded

anybody who says shelden williams is an adequate replacement for LP should be slapped. what kind of numbers do you think Leon would have put up on this piss-poor sacramento kings? anybody remember what his averages were per 48 minutes? he rebounded at a more efficient rate than anyone in the league at one point.

No we don’t know how he’ll produce after 2 knee surgeries, but it’s clear it wouldn’t have taken much to have him back. Danny without question dropped the ball on this one.

by JunkyardDawg on Aug 11, 2009 11:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I think that Williams has a lower ceiling offensively considering it is hard to imagine him improving much at 26, but Williams is an adequate replacement for Powe this season because Williams can actually play.

Considering the minutes for Powe would have been considerable less, even if he was healthy, since Sheed is now in town, the impact of the difference seems minimal.

by guava_wrench on Aug 11, 2009 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rebounding rates are comparable.

Williams is a superior defensive rebounder, and an inferior offensive rebounder.

by dslack on Aug 11, 2009 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s a smarter and better defender.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we all understand NBA marketing, where fans become more invested in players than teams. But all this weeping and wailing assumes that Leon will be a workable NBA player when he returns, and that is simply not a safe assumption.

In the meantime, I love the Williams signing. Smart player who’ll work hard.

by CoachBo on Aug 12, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

If there's any PERSON I want to succeed

it’s Leon. But, if there’s any TEAM I want to succeed, it’s the C’s. I hope that this was the right decision for the team. Danny wasn’t banking on Powe’s knee. That’s it. Maybe he’s right, maybe he’s wrong. We won’t know for a while. But Danny has the info from trainers and team doctors, and so far I’d say he’s doing a pretty good job running this ship. I won’t try to predict the rest of Powe’s career, or even if he’s a factor when he comes back this year, but I at least at this point in time can accept the reasoning of the decisions being made.

Powe, you’re a class act. I wish you a long and lucrative career. And I don’t care who you play for, because I don’t mind beating good teams.

Danny, you’ve been right more often than not, and regardless of the what could’ve beens with Powe, I can’t wait to watch this Celtics team this year!

by Ritzybeanboy on Aug 11, 2009 11:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Two safe predictions...

1} The next time Leon goes down with a serious knee injury, which will be in the very near future…his NBA career will be over.

2} When that unfortunate event does occur…the same people blasting Ainge tonight will become suddenly silent.

Leon is a great guy, but his knees absolutely suck!

by Title 18 on Aug 12, 2009 12:10 AM EDT reply actions  

So What?

We’re talking one year at the league minimum and a team option for year two. If hwe’s knee goes out, it costs you very little.

The Celtics were cheap and everone knows it.

by Brickowski on Aug 12, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh lord..

The Celtics were cheap? LOL. We do know that the Celtics have a top 3 payroll right? We do know that the owners will pay more than $20 million in luxury taxes right?

I’m not sure people understand the gravity of Powe’s injuries. He just tore his ACL in the same knee for the SECOND time. Nene took a whole year to come back from his first torn ACL and has never been the same. This whole Feb thing is just spin put on by Goodwin, Powe’s agent. This is the same guy who claimed his client Vin Baker was not a drunk and the Celtics were scum for trying to void his contract. Powe will not play this year. The Cavs are just hoping he makes enough progress to make decision for 2010-2011..

by BWC on Aug 12, 2009 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

There`s nothing easier than spending other people`s money...

As a player {`87 Finals}…Danny knows what it`s like not to win a title due to injuries.
As a GM {`09}….Danny knows what it`s like not to win a title due to injuries.

Nobody can control injuries, but….Who can blame Danny for doing all he possibly can to see to it that, if he loses a title, it will not be because of injuries?

Remember, Boston has a very short window of opportunity to win more titles.

by Title 18 on Aug 12, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree Brick

and 1/2 the cost to bring back Powe is being used exclusively as an “incentive” in a contract for BBD to not be fat. Just think about that for a second when you compare it to Powe’s drive and mentality. Do you think he’d ever need extra money to encourage him to show up on time, or do basic things that are expected of nba players? What I’m getting at is that the Celtics aren’t all cheap.. they didn’t sign Powe for “financial” reasons, and yet they’re throwing money away for stupid reasons…. it kills me.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 12, 2009 8:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Powe's contract pre-injury

1. Leon would not have signed here for a discount if he had not been injured (i.e. no injury he’s looking at a 3 million deal)
2. The team should only have signed Leon if it was a smart BBall move

At the min with a second team option, it was a good gamble to sign Leon – the C’s may never have had that chance, or maybe they did and just dropped the ball. Who knows. That contract is great for the team, and only okay for Leon.

As for the knee injury – I know a kid with two ACL tears on the same knee. He’s skiing professionally making extreme tele-ski videos. The point is that the computer arm chair doctors who say Leon will be back full strength, or not, at some point in time – are all guessing. But recent history is that most guys can make it back from an ACL tear – and Leon played after his tear, so it was NOT a Tony Allen knee explosion. He also knows how to recover from this type of thing. I’d guess its 75% he plays next year and 25% that he regains near his normal level of play.

by Brendan on Aug 12, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I`m NOT wishing injury upon Leon...

I`m ONLY predicting.

It`s no different than predicting a 99 year old man will soon die…regardless of his current health.

Leon blew out a knee as a California-Berkeley Bear.
Leon blew out a knee as a Boston Celtic.
Leon will blow out a knee as a Cleveland Cavalier.

by Title 18 on Aug 12, 2009 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Take it easy with Williams

He is not to blame for the way Danny handled the Powe situation.

by greenwise on Aug 12, 2009 1:57 AM EDT reply actions  

I mean, I like Leon but . . .

I’m really satisfied where our bench is at right now. We’re really deep in terms of big men, Baby’s back, we got Sheed, Daniels — life is good.

:-)

by rrc589 on Aug 12, 2009 2:43 AM EDT reply actions  

I hate Cleveland even more now.

Good luck to Leon though but it hurts to see him sign with the Cavs. Hopefully he won’t haunt us in the playoffs but I highly doubt that.

by Drucci on Aug 12, 2009 4:41 AM EDT reply actions  

“Sources say Celtics tried to re-sign him after word got out about Cavs.”

Tried to pull a BBD on Powe, huh?
Too late now, Danny.

by braz on Aug 12, 2009 6:15 AM EDT reply actions  

No chance this is true at all.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Aug 12, 2009 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

why?

because it refutes your point?

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Aug 12, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because it makes no sense

I find it hard to believe that Powe trying to sign with another team was a shock to Danny. That story implies that Danny wasn’t aware Powe was capable of signing to another team.

by Marqui on Aug 12, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

It only makes sense to the people who are inexplicably embittered about the decision to let Leon go. As the poster said above, I am not at all sure people understand the gravity of Leon’s knees – the odds are CLEARLY against him returning any time soon to contribute to an NBA title contender.

This is the right decision at the right time for a team with a narrow title window. I wish Leon the best, and I feel bad for him and his career, which is almost certain to be diminished by the injuries.

by CoachBo on Aug 12, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Listen, nobody knows the state of Leon's knee...

People just assume whatever outcome fits their preferred conclusion.

Teams with 15-man rosters pay 3 guys not to play—Leon seemed perfect for one of those spots as a low risk, high reward type guy…

This isn’t about windows…

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

4 major knee injuries...boston in a limited win now window...

not sure if powe wil even come back this year….boston did the right thing

by celticinorlando on Aug 12, 2009 7:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Your math=not right

2 major knee injuries, 3 reconstructions, 1 bone graft

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

logic dictates they did.

how any of you could vote no without having a clue as to how injured Powe is or why Ainge passed on him is beyond me.

If Powe was a good as some think Ainge would have signed him to minimum contract injury or not. The problem is the starting point, IMO.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Aug 12, 2009 8:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Then why did Powe get so much interest from other playoff teams?

And yet your beloved BBD didn’t end up getting an offer? If a guy with injured knees is generating interest then it says something about his nba game, his determination, and the odds that he will make it back. Like I stated above, the Celtics could have spent BBD’s $500k don’t-be-fat-incentive money towards Leon’s contract and gotten more out of it.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 12, 2009 8:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

What type of interest? A two year vet min. contract with a team option doesn’t speak very well as having a lot of interest out there.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

And correction on BBD

BBD didn’t get an offer that teams felt the Celtics wouldn’t match. Detroit wanted BBD for pretty much the same amount of money we gave him; around 3 million, maybe it was more. But, we all knew the Celtics could match that, and lo and behold, that’s just about his contract now. New Jersey showed interest in BBD too; the sign and trade was rumored, and probably would’ve been more because again, New Jersey didn’t want to offer the kind of money they probably thought the Celtics would shy away from.

Just wanted to clear that up.

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Leon`s NOT the first....Knees have destroyed other careers, too

Mickey Mantle was washed up at 32.
Joe Namath was washed up at 27.
Gayle Sayers was washed up at 25.

Leon is 25.

Shawn Livingston is facing the same situation.

by Title 18 on Aug 12, 2009 8:19 AM EDT reply actions  

This isn't the '60's

Sports medicine has come a LONG way even in the last decade…

by nba is the worst on Aug 12, 2009 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Heart vs. Head

I more often than not go with loyalty and heart in these matters, but I grudgingly agree with Danny on this decision. It was a tough business decision, period. He had to decide whether to wait on a very questionable knee, or go with someone who could help them win a title this year.
I think he’s very mindful of that window of opportunity closing, and of that need for as helpful a bench as possible, and/or to have pieces he can move if necessary. Maybe Powe was low-risk/high-reward. I’m not so sure.
Powe may recover from his knee surgery. He may not. But even if Powe comes back fine, I can’t fault Danny.
Tough call.

by Big_Easy on Aug 12, 2009 8:20 AM EDT reply actions  

good offseason all around

but this was one of the mistakes I think

I also wish they would have not bad mouthed Rondo and I’d like the backup PG position filled with a real PG

but all things considered, I can’t complain too much about this offseason – we’re a lot better now

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Aug 12, 2009 8:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Indeed we are

The rasheed signing alone is enormous. We’ve seen what happens when you replace above-average players (Al Jefferson) with a superstar (KG). Now take your backup big (Scal, BBD, whoever) and replace him with Rasheed…. that can’t be over-estimated.

The daniel’s signing, when it happens, is another scenario of replacing someone with quality. I’m really astounded at the lack of quality on this team. We have 7 players who fall between above-league-average to superb at their position: KG, Perk, Pierce, Ray Allen, Rondo, Rasheed, and Daniels. House is no scrub either.

To me the Powe signing would have signified a few things: a commitment to a player, to the future, and to the community. This team doesn’t need it’s 15th roster spot for quite some time. If Leon has a good chance of coming back reasonably healthy towards the end of the season & playoffs, then you do it for the cost. I understand it’s other people’s money, but IMO they wasted money in other aspects. In addition, the Leon situation could have been handled better by the organization.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 12, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

You prefer Leon over Baby, we know this because you bash Glen Davis all the time

how is signing leon a commitment to the future, and to the community? thats ridicoulous. the community will forget about when and if we win #18. this is a buissness, and danny made the right move, not to mention Baby being the much, much better piece for the future…and oh yeah just signed him to a steal of a deal

I agree with Jeff about the PG situation – its pretty pathetic, rondo has yet to have an actual decent backup for an entire season, and right now he has the biggest load to carry on this team, and I feel as though hes our most important piece going forward….why rip him like we did in the offseason? that was a joke

by latin on Aug 12, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

i don't like it either, but it was the right thing for the franchise

in that we don’t really have PT for Leon any more. Given that we’ve signed BBD (for better or worse) Leon Powe seems kind of redundant. Powe and Davis were always redundant, actually, but keeping both made sense as long as they were on rookie contracts. Now that DA has chosen to go with Glen, there’s no actual need for a 3rd backup.

I think part of building a good team is paying close attention to role efficiency. You don’t want to fill a given team role with any more players than you need to. Having a clear backup at each position eliminates redundancy, and makes substituting less of a guessing game for the coach. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t keep 2 different backups who give you different looks, but that the difference between Powe and Davis isn’t that big when it comes to the role they would have played on this team. Keeping both of them would have taken away minutes from both of them, and would ultimately hurt both players. I think Danny HAD to choose one or the other, and given Powe’s injury history it would be hard to defend keeping Leon over BBD.

by milt palacio's shot on Aug 12, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder if they are worried about Scal

KG, Perk, Sheed, BBD, Scal – that seems like enough big men to cover any injuries, but maybe Scal is still a question mark? Otherwise bringing in Sheldon seems like over kill.

by Brendan on Aug 12, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we don't get that backup PG

We may use Scal’s contract along with TA’s. You never know.

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let me rephrase that

IF we don’t get that backup PG right now, before training camp, we may use Scal’s contract along with TA’s to get that backup PG in the mid-season.

You never know. : )

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Everyone is too emotional on this

Let is go, your talking about someone on your team who is at best your 8,9, and 10th player.

Your talking about someone who had 3 knee operations on the same knee.

You have to look at it Basketball sense and not think about feelings. What is Leon Powe going to bring to this team in 2009-2010 season. As on now we don’t know based on his injury and that he can’t contribute to this team till after January

If this was 2-4 years ago, I’d say fine. Sign the man, but this team is looking a Championship for the upcoming year.

Cleveland is taking a gamble on Leon

I like the man as everyone else in here does, but you have to look at it and ask yourself. Does signing Leon Powe right now make basketball sense for this team.

by Ancient Red on Aug 12, 2009 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Ancient Red we both just made the same point

and I agree with you – signing Leon doesn’t make basketball sense for the C’s this season.

(btw he’s now had 2 knee operations, not 3!)

by milt palacio's shot on Aug 12, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like Leon, no question

But he’s damaged goods right now and isn’t bringing anything to the table, Leon is a feel good story for all of us based on his upbringing and how he had to handle things in his life and I respect that very much.

But it’s a cruel world out here, especially in the business world and we make decisions everyday right or wrong on what we feel we have to do

by Ancient Red on Aug 12, 2009 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Leon Powe

this breaks my heart since I loved Leon so much. Shelden Williams is going to sit on the bench so why couldn’t we have signed leon for the same money and wait for him to get better. I think Danny blew this just like he blew posey last year.

by Red2 on Aug 12, 2009 9:10 AM EDT reply actions  

how do you know shelden williams is going to sit on the bench?
it doesnt take a whole lot to fill a leon powe role with a stacked team, sorry to burst your bubble

by latin on Aug 12, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

THis many passionate posts about Leon reminds me of...

… after games during the SEASON! Its coming…
…And since its been so well said in so many ways above, I will just add that Leon powes quality as a ballplayer and as a man is reflected here in the amount and depth of all these posts. Hopefully Danny will learn from this.

by jyrecelts on Aug 12, 2009 9:12 AM EDT reply actions  

Too bad the Powe-tition didn't reach Danny...

If it is true that the Cs countered the Cavs offer… this is a pathetically short-sighted move by the Cs.

This is exactly the deal the Cs should have offered Powe following their decline of the QO – it seemed like a no-brainer. At the time, people offered the excuses that Powe is injured, he’d take up a roster spot, yadda, yadda, yadda….

And then Ainge picked up Shelden Williams…

And then Big Baby…

And now people will argue that the Cs have too many frontcourt players. Phooey, I say!

This would have been the classic low risk, high reward deal… If Powe comes back, the Cs could leverage BBD in a trade. If it didn’t work out, the Cs could cut bait at the end of the year.

Duh…

I wish the best to Mr. Powe. He sounds like a class act… it is going to be hard to root against him.

This has angered me enough that I won’t be buying any tickets to the TB Banknorth Fleet Center Garden this year.

by vwoodruff on Aug 12, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Good to know

Maybe those are 82 potential tickets I get my hands on. : )

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Proficiency

Powe got more free throws per fga and had a better points per fga than any Celtic player since Maxwell. A big mistake not to have resigned him.

by Celtsfansince55 on Aug 12, 2009 9:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Good riddance

Sorry, im probably the only one to say that, but I just cant stand the legion of celtics fans that would tear baby down to build leon up…and im not going to have to deal with that anymore.
Leon was overrated. got to the ft line, was a terrible ft shooter, one of the worst passers i have ever seen in my life bar none, he had a terrible season this year (minus maybe a month) and hes the only player fans let get away with it, because he scored 21 pts in the finals when being defended by …Luke walton.

Danny got this right, the coaching staff clearly played a part in it, not to mention we could see with our own 2 eyes doc played baby more, even in the regular season when baby was an out of shape rookie and leon had only had 1 serious knee injury, he got more minutes then leon.

good luck and so long

by latin on Aug 12, 2009 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

say it aint so powe ?

 i am very happy for leon he is one of the good guys in the n.b.a. danny blew this one then when rumors came he was going to the cavs he wanted to resign him . well to little to late danny boy what you thought is that no team was going to sign him and some where down the line you were going to wait till he was healthy to bring him back well it does not work that way everybody was talking bbd this and bbd that how come nobody made davis a good contract offer why did the cavs take a shot at a player who has a history of bad knees ? over davis. it goes to show you what kind of heart and player powe is over davis for the cavs it was worth the risk to them but not worth the risk for the celtics good luck leon hope to see you at playoff time when maybe your cavs will be playing the celts…..

by lohaus#54 on Aug 12, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

I'll say it has many times as I need to in this thread

BBD did get offers from Detroit and New Jersey. He just didn’t get an offer so big (which would be MLE level) that the Celtics were likely to say “Bye Bye, Baby”, to quote Tony Kornheiser from PTI…heh.

Detroit wanted BBD for 3M. That’s still at least 3 times more than what Powe was given by the Cavs. You wanna tell me about what BBD did or didn’t get?

New Jersey wanted BBD in a possible S+T, but that didn’t pan out.

 Isn’t that what we’re giving BBD now? Come on, this isn’t complicated. Teams aren’t gonna have their money tied up on a RFA when that player’s team is likely to match the offered deal.

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

This Isn't About Basketball Skill

It’s about the organization’s loyalty to an injured player, who, before his injury, gave 110% every time he stepped on the floor, was active in the community and showed class and character every step of the way. If any organization isn’t going to stand behind a player like that, it will never stand behind anyone.

Ainge should have offered what Cleveland offered, but he should have done it first.

by Brickowski on Aug 12, 2009 11:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Danny Does Stand Behind His Players

Amongst the confusion when Danny was first hired Chris Wallace low-balled Walter McCarty with an offer. McCarty was upset and Danny rectified it. Later, when Waltah saw he no longer fitted in with the team being developed he asked to be traded. Danny traded him to a good team and got basically nothing in return. When Antoine was signed by Miami as a free-agent Danny agreed to a sign and trade so that ‘Toine could get more money from Miami, and again, got basically nothing in return. When the KG deal was done Danny called Big Al beforehand to let him know what was happening and comforted him by telling him to think of it this way, he was being traded for a future HOFer. And etc., etc. No one knows what went on behind the scenes of Leon’s situation except that Danny did not initially offer him a contract. I doubt very much that Danny did not discuss this with Leon and explain why he was doing what he did.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 12, 2009 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

And then there's Marquis Daniels?

Hasn’t Danny tried to get Daniels here via a S+T so Daniels could get more money?

It says a lot about Powe that people still want him despite the fact he’s on a knee that won’t be good till mid-season, but this is ridiculous. Danny probably thought he’d be available come mid-season, he was wrong, oh well. Don’t we still need a backup PG, ANYWAYS?

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

They have already stood by leon while he was a celtic….Leon was a free agent and danny did what was best for the team, whats so hard to figure out here? he needs to show loyalty to a second unit bench guy who has serious knee problems?

by latin on Aug 12, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah!

This is a ridiculous way of thinking about filling out a basketball roster.

by jdpapa3 on Aug 12, 2009 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Perspective please . .

Leon will be missed. It was hard to see Bill Russell coach in Seattle, hard to say good bye to Paul Silas as a Celtic, hard to see the Chief in Chicago . . . and will be hard to see Leon with the Cav’s. But look at the front line he will face upon a return to the Garden; I gotta love what Danny has put together even if it doesn’t include Leon. Nothing will negate the mojo Leon brought to the Celts. We have much for which to be grateful, including Leon’s time in green, and one helluva an upcoming season.

by OldCeltFan on Aug 12, 2009 11:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Nice

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 12, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good anolgies, except Leon isnt Bill Russell, Paul Silas or the Chief anywhere but around here

by latin on Aug 12, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right call IMO

they wasted a roster spot.

God bless and good night!

by BrickJames on Aug 12, 2009 11:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Is this signing official?

Let’s all remember this reality—with a 15-man roster, the Cs will always be paying 3 players NOT TO PLAY. I don’t know why Leon couldn’t have been one of those three.

Still hoping DA sneaks in like a snake and gets Powe back (assuming it’s not official yet).

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

That’s a VERY bad way to look at it. First of all you have to factor in contacts that are already guaranteed. And then you can go from there.

We have 6 big men currently. No need to add a 7th with the injury history Powe has.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

what?

What do guaranteed contracts have to do with anything? It’s a FACT that with a 15 man roster, 3 guys are paid not to play. Last year it was POB, before that it was Pollard, it could have been Powe this season…Powe would have made the minimum, just like any other non-playing 13th-15th man…there’s zero risk.

Going into the season w/7 big men and coming out of the season with w/7 big men are TWO different things—guys like Scal, Williams, even Big Baby could be dealt depending on needs that arise during the season.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is what it has to do with it.

Our 3 inactive players may very well be Scal, Tony, and Walker/Giddens… for example. Scal and Tony were fully guaranteed coming in and not picking Walker/Giddens’ option would’ve been a mistake.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still have no idea what your point is...

Every player currently on the roster is ‘guaranteed’—this isn’t football.

Walker/Giddens don’t have options this season…

And, my point was, no matter who’s on the roster—hell, we could have a roster of 15 all-stars—3 of those players will always be getting paid NOT TO PLAY. Guarantees and options don’t matter—it’s purely about the #s. All teams pay a certain # of players not to play—so all this handwringing about Powe not being able to play until March misses the point because there will always be a percentage of the roster not able to play regardless.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

The point is that you went out and signed players to be in your rotation and pushed guaranteed contracts out of the 12-man roster. It means that you went out to improve your team. Giving a roster spot to Powe doesn’t accomplish this. It simply wastes a roster spot unnecessarily and fully preventable.

So giving a roster spot to Powe doesn’t take away a spot from “someone who’s not going to play anyways”. He’s spot can actually take away a roster spot from a player that will be a contributor to this team.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, you still don't have a clue

By my count, Giddens and Williams are our current 13th and 14th men (assuming Daniels is signed)…those players won’t be contributors UNLESS there are injuries….and even if there are injuries, we’ll still have backups ready to insert. We’re talking about the 15th man on this team—yes, there’s a CHANCE the 15th man is called upon, at some point, to be a contributor. But it’s a small chance, especially early in the season when a guy like Powe—if he were the 15th man—wouldn’t be able to play…by the end of the season, he COULD be a contributor because he’d be healthy by then.

There will always be 3 players paid not to play on every team with a 15 man roster…if Powe is one of those players ALL SEASON long, there’s no harm in that.

Powe WILL be a contributer, but not until later in the season. That’s better than other players in the past who have been paid to not play—guys like POB, or Pollard—not only were they paid not to play, they couldn’t play in the first place. Leon’s has shown he can play, it’s just a matter of getting healthy.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clearly you didn’t understand the point I was making. Stop closing your eyes. You don’t know who will be in our 12-men roster, neither do I. The point still stands.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

It doesn't matter who's on the 12 man roster

It only matters that, any which way you cut it, there will be 2-3 players being paid not to play. Having Powe occupy one of those non-playing spots represents zero risk to the Cs.

I mean, were we overly disadvantaged by having Pollard on the roster during our championship season? He only played in 22 games that year, which is about the amount Leon will play in the upcoming season (assuming he comes back after the All-Star break).

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

The 12 man roster does matter if signing Powe would prevent the Celtics from actually acquiring a player that could form part of that roster. If you can understand something so simple, then there’s no need to go any further.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're not making any sense

We have 14 players on the roster right now (assuming Daniels)—and a pretty solid 10 man rotation, Rondo/Ray/Paul/KG/Perk/Sheed/Daniels/Baby/House/TA, with Scal/Walker rounding out the top 12. Who are we going to add that will make any diff to that lineup? And why does that small opportunity to add upon what is a pretty solid 10-man rotation in any way affect the 3 players we pay who won’t play?

All I’m talking about is the 15th man—how does that affect the 12 man active roster? E-X-P-L-A-I-N that. You’re not being simple, you’re being obtuse.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s your problem, that you’re assuming anyone we add will simply be the 15th man in our roster.

We’re not going to go out and pursue someone just to fill out the 15th spot in our roster. We’re going to go after players that improve upon our 12th man roster. I really don’t know what’s so freaking hard to understand. Just a simple example, adding Bruce Bowen is a possibility.

I don’t know how you can be so certain that Williams won’t beat Scal for a spot, or that Giddens won’t beat TA or Walker for a spot. Then you can add Bowen or a backup PG, two with high possibilities of making the 12 man roster.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Someone's got to be the 15th man, right?

The backup backup point guard and the backup backup small forward are probably not going to be on the 12 man active roster…

What I’m assuming is that we aren’t going to make any more significant additions via free agency—and that if we did they wouldn’t crack the top 9 in our rotation unless we make a trade—a trade which would probably open up a roster spot or two.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

easy guys

don’t make it personal

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Aug 12, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re simply making a ton of assumptions without exploring all the real possibilities… assumtions to simply help you rationalize why signing Powe would’ve been the obvious thing to do. I love how you already KNOW that some backup PG or SF we might find has no chance of making our 12 man roster.

As for a trade… when and if it happens, then speak to me then since I’ve said a million times before that not until a trade is made would having Powe taking a roster space would make any sense.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, at least I know you're assumptions now

I tend to think that neither Powe nor Bowen nor the backup backup point guard are going to have ANY bearing on our championship aspirations. As such, I like the idea of keeping Powe around…

As always, it’s going to be about the health of our top 5.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

The backup backup point guard and the backup backup small forward are probably not going to be on the 12 man active roster

So Marquis Daniels (back up swingman/ pg) and Eddie House (backup sg/pg) are not going to be on the 12 man roster… sure w.e. you say…

Salmon face the facts Leon has very bad knee problems and is questionable for next season and most likely won’t come back to his fullstrenght…

Would you rather have a player who can play now in Shelden Williams or Leon who is a huge ? mark…

Yeah, in a 15 man roster the last 3 players are inactive but if you re-sign Powe then we can’t get a backup pg or Bowen who would be on the 12 man roster…

You don’t just re-sign someone for the good of that player… You do what is for the GOOD OF THE TEAM and passing on Leon is for the good of the team to open a roster spot for a player we know can contribute…

Danny did the right thing…

BudweiserCeltic is right SalmonAndMashedPotatoes.

by Mike-Dub on Aug 12, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're twisting things, Dub

The backup backup point guard, as in Lester Hudson or Tyronn Lue.

The backup backup small forward, as in Bruce Bowen or any other crap player who’s still available at the minimum.

I agree that it’s prudent to keep roster spots open for players that can contribute—but it’s also prudent to remember that due to the nature of the 15 man roster, there will be players who can’t play, by definition, and so, it’s not completely necessary that each and every player on the 15 man roster be able to play at the beginning of the season. Realistically, only 10 or so players are going to get significant playing time, with only 7 or so of those players and their contributions having any real impact on the team’s overall ability to contend for a championship.

The end of the roster has almost zero effect on the outcome of the season, so arguments about having contributing players all the way to player 15 make zero sense.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

no its not

those 3 guys at the end of the roster almost always end up on the active roster for injuries at some point in the season.

by jdpapa3 on Aug 12, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great move dumping Powe

I loved him as much as everyone else here but too much of a gamble for a championship team. Keeping our bigs healthy is priority #1 this year after last year and Powe does not help that situation in any shape or form this season. One of those tough business decision but the right call. Now if this was the prior season and we had no injuries the C’s might have made a different call on this but we experienced what happens with a depleted roster last year. IMO he will not help the Cavs this year.

by Timdawgg on Aug 12, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Master Po and others

Calm down, Man. You’d have to be a total loser to not like Leon Powe. I loved him and the knee injury was a terrible break for him. Don’t be a dreamer Master Po. Coach Bo (who I never agree with) hit it right by calling it “Namath knees” . Leon got dealt bad cards. His draft order fell because he had bad knees. He’s now injured the left knee for a 3rd time. The odds are the 4th injury will come quicker than the 3rd did vs the 2nd. I think Danny was right. Even the 15th spot on the roster needs to have some semblance of logic to it and Leon coming back….I don’t know. Put me down as one of those guys you can Yack at if he does. What do I care? I’d be happy as hell for Leon but still agree with Danny.

by Wildblu1 on Aug 12, 2009 12:59 PM EDT reply actions  

get your facts straight...

Leon’s had 2 knee major injuries—one in high school (when he was either 16 or 17) and one at age 25.

The first injury required 2 reconstructions—the first one was done immediately after the injury, and allowed Leon to come back and play his senior year of high school, and his freshman year of college—after his freshman season, the team doctors recommended that he have the 1st reconstruction re-done. The reconstruction was re-done, and later a bone graft was performed to strengthen the area. That’s 2 reconstructions, 1 bone graft, stemming from the same high school injury.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

He missed an entire year of college due to that surgery however. Is it not reasonable to say that he could be out for at least a similar time-frame for a second tear?

by BWC on Aug 12, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, it's not

As it happened, Leon had the reconstruction first and then, 6 months later, had the bone graft done…that’s why he missed the entire season.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does it even matter?

You’re obsessing over technicalities. Does that change the substance of the matter, which is the fact that Leon’s knees have suffered significant damage and he has missed significant amounts of time due to them?

by BWC on Aug 12, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why suffer the details?

Oh, I don’t know, I guess I think the truth matters…

People on here making points with trumped up ‘facts’ does bother me…

People counting out Leon without a good idea of what he’s overcome already does bother me…

People assuming that Leon’s not going to come back does bother me…

People completely misunderstanding modern medicine, and making assumptions and putting up odds of recovery does bother me…

Modern medicine has come a long way—Leon had his recent surgery with one of the best surgeons in the nation—it’s well known that the anterior cruciate ligament often comes back stronger after surgery—with the use of HGH or other cutting edge healing medicines, Leon can easily make a full recovery within the 6-9 month time frame—and Leon’s past experience and ability to recover in the past proves that he knows how to come back—successful comeback aren’t about the physical healing, it’s about the mentality after injury and how confident you are in your recovery—Leon’s got the mental part licked, making his recovery just a matter of time.

People completely disregarding that roster spots 13-15 are basically players who are paid not to play and thus good spots to stash players recovering from injury and who will be ready to play after the All-Star break…that bothers me.

It’s all about the details.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

What a minute Salmon? Are you claiming you know Powe’s odds of recovery? All anyone has EVER done here is speculate on the likelihood of return. No one says he will never come back for certain.

The man suffered a serious knee injury. There have been players whom have come back stronger after ONE ACL surgery but relatively none that have come back after 2.

No one is being out line by stating Leon’s career is in serious jeopardy. It is extremely possible, probably likely that Powe is done. Of course no one knows for sure, but there is tremendous risk involved when you’re talking about letting healthy guys who can play go for rehab cases. Celtics chose to go in a less riskier direction. That’s all..

by BWC on Aug 12, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is not “guessing” to say Leon will struggle to come back from this injury. He tore his ACL for the second time. There is plenty of precedent to examine to determine that this is a very serious injury. A torn ACL was basically a career ender 20 years ago. It’s true that they’ve made advances but not to the point where an ACL tear is like a sprained ankle or something.

Have we also forgotten that Powe missed a ton of time last year due to a sprained knee? This guy’s knees are just a tragic waste but we have to move on..

by BWC on Aug 12, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Salmon &... You're kidding right

He didn’t have three knee surgeries. He had two but one required two reconstructions. OK pal, you got me on a technicality. I take it back. That’s one super knee.
It’s that kind of nuttiness that we are lucky Danny doesn’t suffer from.

by Wildblu1 on Aug 12, 2009 2:15 PM EDT reply actions  

2 is different than 3

Yes, I know it’s hard to believe.

3 reconstructions, 1 bone graft, 2 injuries. Got it?

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fellas, please.

Can we stop the arguing now? No matter which side of this Powe thing you are on?

What’s done is done. None of us has a crystal ball. In fact, Williams or Rasheed or Scal or KG, Perk or anybody could suffer an injury tomorrow and not make it back until well after Leon might see the court. So be it.
The team made a decision based on the facts, medical and otherwise, presented to them at the time the decision was entered.

It’s ovah.
Fuggedaboudit.

What you need to do now is support your 2009-2010 Boston Celtics to the best of your ability. And if you cannot do that, I’m sorry. I liked Leon and what he represented just as much as the next guy. But I love the Boston Celtics more.
Whether Leon is in uniform, on the Cavs bench, or rehabbing in the Bay area, I’ll be happy for him but I ’m hoping for the same thing. That we kick the Cavs butts every time we play them.

by DrD on Aug 12, 2009 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Sorry, But the Celtics' Organization Showed a Lack of Class

..in its handling of the Powe situation.

Just keep in mind what Auerbach did with Jim Loscutoff, who also suffered a knee injury that was thought to be career ending.

Or how about 1982, when Indiana’s Landon Turner was paralyzed in a car accident just prior to the draft. As a favor to Bobby Knight (who started a fund that raised 400,000 to coverTurner’s medical expenses), Auerbach drafted him that year to bolster his spirits even though he knew Turner would never play again.

Ainge is no Auerbach.

by Brickowski on Aug 12, 2009 6:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Well by that logic..

Every team that has ever not picked up a player’s option has shown a “lack of class”. Which means every team in the league at the end of the day. Because the bottom line is that’s all the Celtics have done as far as I can tell. They didn’t void Leon’s contract. They didn’t cut him. They just declined to pick up his option.

All the hysterics came from Powe’s camp and the media..

by BWC on Aug 12, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

strained logic BWC

Brick’s just saying that there’s a right and wrong way to do business and this is one of the few instances where Danny didn’t do things the right way…

The ‘lack of class’ was basically kicking Leon to the curb after Leon came back early from injury to help the Cs playoff run and blew out his knee in the process. It’s not about picking up the option—that was a defensible business move—it was about not even offering him a partially guaranteed minimum level contract after declining the option. The end of the roster of every team is filled with minimum-level players who never play meaningful minutes (like Cassell, POB, and Giddens last year). Ainge knows that and he could have easily ‘taken a chance’ on Powe recovering in time to contribute AND still provided the team it’s best chance to win (since he ended up providing this team with 6 bigs—instead he said he wasn’t interested in Powe unless he was healthy.

Signing Powe wouldn’t have negatively affected anything—the team’s chances of winning a championship, the team’s luxury tax hit all remain the same with or without Powe—and it only could have helped. But Ainge still said no, only to realize his mistake way too late…

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 12, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did DA lack class for not offering a contract to Pollard?

Listen, this is very simple… Powe was a victim of inopportune timing, nothing more nothing less. Ainge’s first responsability is to build the best roster he can manage. Charity comes second.

Under different circumstances, Powe would’ve been offered a contract no doubt about it… and I don’t doubt that after Ainge explored better FA alternatives and had found nothing about that he would have no problems with offering Powe a contract. As it stands, Powe would’ve restricted numerous opportunities to attract FA’s, etc. for Danny.

All year long last year we were talking about how only one of Baby and Powe will be kept, but because Powe is now injured it’s making DA look like a jackass, when he’s not. He’s built a very good roster.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think this is the way I look at it. Powe just blew out his knee at this worst possible time. My guess is if he would have stayed healthy throughout the playoffs, he’d have a nice contract in hand from the C’s. I think Powe would have been making the minimum anyway had the C’s picked up his option. That’s why they’re called “options”, it gives the team a choice to not retain a player. Teams wouldn’t bother with them if they never intended to use them.

I just hope that when the Cavs decline his option next year, these same people will be calling the Cavs “classless”..

by BWC on Aug 12, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who said Powe came back too early from his knee strain?

That wasn’t even the same knee that he hurt.

Danny declined a team option, was upfront and told Powe his decision in person. I don’t see how this reflects badly on the Celtics. They didn’t lie to the player, they weren’t dishonest. They didn’t blackball him or badmouth him around the league either!

by Fafnir on Aug 12, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

He did come back too early

With the medical work done on his left knee, any lower leg injury, especially on the opposite leg, should have been conservatively treated, since injuries on the other leg raise the risk of overcompensation, placing an unnatural amount of torque on the other, previously injured knee.

Injury prevention is about keeping one’s balance—his previous knee injury threw off his balance, putting too much pressure on his surgically-repaired knee on the other leg, leading to injury.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 13, 2009 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brick and Salmon

You both better fess up to being wrong if Powe does nothing this season. Personally, I found it laughable that both of you think you know better than anyone else about what will happen with Powe’s injury. DA has made mistakes; we know that. With POB, with not giving Posey a wee bit more money, although the money he didn’t give Posey he was able to use to get guys like Wallace + Daniels + Williams (to a lesser extent, granted), and re-sign BBD. And yes, apparently DA did make a late push for Powe when his ears heard about the Cavs wanting him. He probably though he could get him at mid-season, and it didn’t work out. Oh well. Why should we blame DA for that? And WHAT, Salmons, was the point of declining the QO for Powe for some minimum level contract? I don’t think DA would’ve worried about guaranteeing Powe about 1 million.

At the end of the day though, we don’t have Powe and we may be better off for it. I hope you both admit you’re wrong if it turns out Powe doesn’t do much this season. I respect your opinions, but I also respect what DA’s done. He’s not Red, he’s human, so for crying out loud, stop trying to use that fact to downgrade him. If anyone looked at DA differently just because he didn’t sign a player who may not play for half the season, then that’s their problem. We’ll see who got the last laugh.

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 7:01 PM EDT reply actions  

You're Completely Missing the Point

It doesn’t matter if Powe never plays again. Landon Turner never played again (except wheelchair basketball).

You do what’s right and what reflects well on the organization. Every player in the league and every agent is aware of how Ainge mishandled the situation.

by Brickowski on Aug 12, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Including Daniels, Sheed, Williams, Hill, Moon, Marbury, etc. among all the others that have expressed interest in playing here.

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 12, 2009 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I haven't heard any players be critical of the C's about this

Just some blogs and some columnists. And Powe’s agent of course.

Danny decided to not resign Powe, what’s wrong with that decision. When is a frachise obligated to resign a player?

by Fafnir on Aug 12, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Tim Williams too

Probably one of the earliest rumors in the off-season as far as who’d come here, but he showed interest too.

Didn’t Bowen also?

by Tai on Aug 12, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Landon Turner was never given a guarenteed contract

that would have cost the Celtics millions of dollars and used up a roster spot. The situations aren’t even remotely related. If Powe had suffeered a similar car accident and the C’s decline the option would that have been classless Brick?

by Fafnir on Aug 12, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course not.

Powe was injured in game playing for the Celtics. It is completely different from having a car accident.

by 33-32-00 on Aug 12, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

What are the Celtics required to do for him then?

He was injured in the course of his job. Its a normal basketball related risks and there are contracts and procedures for it. If Powe had a nasty Grant Hill type injury during training camp after signing a big deal would you expect him to give up the value of that contract while he couldn’t play?

Of course not! The Celtics did nothing wrong by choosing not to retain Powe. The only problem is with how Powe and some posters emotionally are dealing with that decision.

by Fafnir on Aug 13, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow

now i know why the celtics decision makers make fun of celticsblog.

by jdpapa3 on Aug 13, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have to agree

Not that I’ve heard anyone from the Celtics FO making fun of CelticsBlog, but if that’s true…I do have to agree with them. : \

To be honest though, I only see Brick and Salmon has the only vocal opposers to not re-signing Powe. Regardless, everyone trying to villify DA and the front office are just trying to make us feel bad (or them, for that matter). We didn’t cut him, we didn’ t toss him out to dry. We simply didn’t re-sign him, and like I’ve been saying, there was a chance DA waned to wait till mid-season to re-sign Powe, hoping he’d be healthy by then. It didn’t work out.

To be honest, for all we know, the Cavs remember what Powe did do them in the Garden last year (you know, the one without KG?) and would rather have Powe rotting on their bench than coming off our bench again with the potential of laying more chin music on them some time in either the regular season or even the playoffs. I will not lose sleep over how DA handled this, and despite what Brick said, guys like Wallace, Daniels, Williams, Moon, Hill, and Marbury (who could still come here) clearly don’t see the Celtics anymore negatively for what happened. Even BBD; he just wanted to get paid.

Seriously…as far as the bashing of the Celtics FO over this, I just don’t get it. Telling us about Red and Landon Turner is just an example of a knee jerker, but it doesn’t make DA look bad.

by Tai on Aug 13, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

My Take On The Leon Powe Situation

First of all I love and respect Leon for what he has done as a player and human being. I would dearly like to see him in a Celtic uniform today. For purposes of this statement I would prefer to leave personalities and how things were done out of this. We do not know how this was handled on a personal level behind the scenes. I would only believe what happened if Leon sat down with us in a room and told us his side directly. With that said, at the time the decision was made to not give Leon a qualifying offer the Team had many needs. Even after all the off-season moves that were made we are still saying the team has needs (talk centers around backup pg). One roster space remains. Leon’s future, physically is unsure. We have a short window of opportunity to win another championship. With this situation I don’t see how anyone could argue with what the organization did. Even with this, it was said in the media, that we did offer to match the contract Cleveland gave Leon. If the sign and trade for Marquis Daniels could have been done, maybe we’d have roster space where we could afford to take a chance on Leon. Even so, we complain that Pierce and Ray need more rest. We need players that can do that and probably more than one. The only player we will have that can most probably give Pierce a blow is Marquis Daniels. No one else on the current roster has proven they can. With all this I don’t think it would have been the responsible thing to give Leon a qualifying offer at the time we would have had to do it. Leon won’t be ready till at least mid-season. Then there’s time to get into playing shape. It’s very questionable that Leon would even be ready in time for the playoffs. I believe in Loyalty and it would have been great if we could have retained Leon. We’re making the Cav’s out to be hero’s here, but what have they really done for Leon. They’re giving him a year’s salary that is less than he’s worth if he were healthy. I haven’t seen that it is guaranteed and the team has an option for the second year. They also have roster space and are looking to sign one or two players that they don’t really need. They need an extra bus for all the guys that play under the basket so how much would Leon play for the Cav’s. So I wouldn’t be overly harsh on the Celtic organization for taking the action it took. It was the responsible thing to do, even if it may not, as some think, the loyal thing to do. I don’t see where they had a choice.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 13, 2009 9:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Just To Add

I think it’s a testament to Leon to see the interest of Celtic Fans in this matter regardless of how they feel. Whether we agree or disagree with what occurred, we all seem to agree that we love and respect Leon.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 13, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah

I know I love and respect Powe.

And all this proves is that life’s unfair. : (

by Tai on Aug 13, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
No Trade
Small
center trade
Small
The Importance of the 6th Seed
Small
Debunking the "Build around Rondo" myth
Imagesca5vwn2y_small
Don't Worry
J0382610_small
Danny Ainge will have to trade Bass et al in exchange of . . .
Small
Why it makes no sense to blow this team up
Small
New CBA, contracts, and opt-outs
I_want_to_believe_small
The Reality of Rondo
401462_10150508373640614_580570613_9007645_2082321498_n_small
Time For The Celtics To Rebuild

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi