Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Celtics Vs. Heat Game 1: Game Time, TV Schedule And More

Baby Gets A Low Offer From C's

Note: "Low" is a relative term.  In this case, Davis was looking for something higher.

BostonHerald.com - Baby tweets his frustration

A league source also confirmed that the Celtics finally started discussing numbers with Davis over the last week, and made an offer that was considered disappointing by the Davis camp.

Poll
What is the largest offer you would match up to for Glen Davis?
None, let him walk
81 votes
Just the qualifying offer
182 votes
2M per year
505 votes
3M per year
1275 votes
4M per year
451 votes
MLE or greater
69 votes

2563 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 107 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well just because the Davis camp didn’t like it doesn’t mean it was “low”. Unless we have details, it can’t be characterized accurately..

by BWC on Aug 5, 2009 6:18 PM EDT reply actions  

if the isiah thomas was still a gm, he might

ppl could always aim high you know.

just sign and trade him please. im starting to like sheldon williams

by aeternus on Aug 5, 2009 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think baby expect to be offered the fill mle..i want him

back but i don’t want him back pouting…time to sign and trade

by celticinorlando on Aug 5, 2009 6:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Baby's emotional

But he’s fundamentally happy guy—he’ll never pout for too long.

3 years/3 million per sounds about right for Baby.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 5, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I read that too

He played well at the end of last year after a very slow beginning. He still has a lot to prove. This isn’t baseball where you get money as a young player before you even prove you CAN play lol

Take a couple years at 2.5 Mil and prove your for real first, then collect

by Staubach on Aug 5, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why Offer At All?

I would have simply said, come back with an offer sheet and we’ll take it from there.

by Brickowski on Aug 5, 2009 6:37 PM EDT reply actions  

there's value in signing someone long term at a fair price

it’ll make for a happier Baby, gives us a young, tradeable asset, and keeps our salary structure stable.

That is, unless you want to do this free agency thing all over again next year. Personally, I’d rather lock him up long term and keep him happy and growing…

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Aug 5, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

baby davis gets low offer ?

look what does this guy want a 100 mill contract this guy is not worth no more than 3 mill per year if they cant sign him then trade him simple as that go sign with the cavs like powe is gonna do …..

by lohaus#54 on Aug 5, 2009 6:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Feel so bad

Wish my boss would disappoint me with 2.5 Mil even though I have not proved anything over a long stretch lol

by Staubach on Aug 5, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

League average salary is 4.9 million

If you were offered half the salary of your co-workers, would you feel slighted?

2.5 million is still a ton of money, but in the NBA players judge their status by their salaries. I’m not surprised Baby is upset at that sort of offer.

by Fafnir on Aug 5, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

theres no way he should be gettin payed less than tony allen and brian scalabrine. but the only way he’ll get he MLE is from a terrible team, and even that is unlikely, so he needs to suck it up n decide to stay with the celtics n he’ll get his money next year. NBA players make me freakin sick. If u look at the pf’s with baby like talent, if theyre gettin payed the MLE its because there on a aqful team. Sometimes u gonna make a sacrafice to be on a good team. Like daniels hes a better player than baby n hes gettin 1.9 mill, rasheed is much better than baby n he’s gettin the MLE, u cant compare players salaries based on other players it should be based on pther players on ur team. n if u look at it that way 2.5 mill a year seems about rite

by celtics94 on Aug 5, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can’t compare it to past contracts…it is a different market. that dollar for dollar luxury tax isn’t as easy for owners that HAD to have taken a hit this past year in the markets.

by jdpapa3 on Aug 5, 2009 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many players entering their 3rd season in the NBA are making 2.5 million? How many are making less?

by BudweiserCeltic on Aug 5, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Average salary is a meaningless value, since a handful of stars are collecting max contracts. The median salary is a better indication of what the average player is getting, and unsurprisingly it’s value is around $2,500,000.

by kozlodoev on Aug 6, 2009 3:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bingo!

I am glad we have at least one person that can understand basic stats. And if the median is around 2.5 mil, then that is about right for BBD. I think he is an average (or median) player.

by droopdog7 on Aug 6, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is noting new

look at are rival Lakers and Odom.Odom cried about his deal,and went back.He’s not worth more than 3 million per year.3 million should be the highest Baby gets per year. He’s going into his third year,and he still needs to prove he can do it for a full season.I have no doubt he can,but the rest of the league wants to see. I think this will end with a one year deal,and he goes back on the market next summer.

by green20 on Aug 5, 2009 6:51 PM EDT reply actions  

It's hard to say he won't

He is for sure the second option for the bigs off the bench. He will basically have the same role he did before. Wallace is taking Powes minutes,and more minutes do to how good he is for match-ups. Baby was the second option off the bench when we had Powe. Shelden will be the third option,and Scal will be the 4th for that spot. It’s still hard to say. He would have to go to a New Jersey for playing time.

by green20 on Aug 5, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

At least the

kind of playing time he wants. He would play 15-20 minutes for Boston I think.Nets maybe closer to 30 minutes.Depends if he starts.He should if they pay him 5 million a year.

by green20 on Aug 5, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he's in NJ I think he starts

His only competition is Najera, Boone, and Yi.

Najera and Boone are much better coming off the bench, IMO. Realisticaly the only one of those 3 who could start over BB is Yi. I don’t know if he’s ready yet though.

by MaineBleedsGreen on Aug 5, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's what it looks like

Then you put in the fact we played Bill WALKER at the 4 spot to last year a few times. No back up point,but will get one.I like Eddie at the 2,and Daniels at the 3 off the bench

by green20 on Aug 5, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

hes second maybe third option off the bench and he can play the 4 n 5 he’ll get prob 15-20 min per game

by celtics94 on Aug 5, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

scal should still be ahead of shelden i hope

by cons on Aug 5, 2009 7:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Depends on match-ups

Scal for offense,but Williams for defense.

by green20 on Aug 5, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Scal for perimeter defense

Williams for post defense.

Scal defends Dirk very well, except when Dirk clocks him in the jaw with an elbow.

by dslack on Aug 6, 2009 3:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you mean

drives his jaw into Dirks elbow….Scal got called for a foul on that concussion.

by IowaGuy on Aug 6, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

True

Kind of like when Chris Kaman’s gonads viciously attacked Reggie Evans’s hand.

by dslack on Aug 7, 2009 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Baby Is The One Saying This Is A Business

I don’t recognize the name of Baby’s agent, but is he really helping his client? When Baby signed his original contract he purposely wanted it for two years so he could be a free agent. The Celtics obliged. Compare all this with when Perk signed his contract. A more than reasonable salary was agreed to fairly quickly by both parties. To me Perk is worth more than what he is getting now. Perk seemed to be looking for some security and I think he really wanted to play here. Baby immediately said he was out for the money. Baby has nothing to complain about, but he is setting up a bad situation of a disgruntled player. Maybe that is their tactic. He has shown constant improvement, but no long term success. At this point we can compare him to Blount, who had one good contract year and got overpaid, because there wasn’t much else on the market that was reasonable. Danny said at the start he would let the market determine Baby’s worth and that is exactly what happened.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 5, 2009 7:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Good example Blount

He still needs to prove he can still have the growth of putting up 15points per game,and 8 rebounds per game if he was a starter.Bench numbers of around 8points and 4 boards would be good to show to. I want him back,but for the right price.

by green20 on Aug 5, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

such a diss

to compare anyone to blount. but there maybe some truth to it.

if bb comes back we’ve got ourselves a very very solid big rotation going into this season. The fact that Sheldon signing for the vet min, and baby re-signing means we leave up what the LLE and the Bi-Annual Exception or something like that? could be wrong. But regardless if it was either or of those and we don’t have to use our 1 or 2 above minimum offers on the Marquis Daniels trade. Then we’d be in a very decent position to atleast pickup a veteran backup pg. Maybe not someone as skilled as we’d all like, but someone who could definitely come in and play 6-12 mpg.

by MaineBleedsGreen on Aug 5, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

is big baby really better then blont?

dudes got height at least

please ,sign and trade bbd. im so fed up with this drama. do i miss our own leon powe.

by aeternus on Aug 5, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Baby Vs Blount

Baby has something in the middle of his chest called “heart”. He also has something near the top of his head called “emotion”. Blount……..I do not like to talk badly of people, but I totally disliked Mark Blount as a player and person. To complain about not getting enough shots while not trying to rebound makes my skin crawl. But I will say comparing Baby now to Blount when he was here that Blount was a better player. He just chose not to play.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 5, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree, but it says something about BBD's ceiling

when for all his heart and effort he can only achieve what Blount does on the boards.

Which is why he’s going to only get 3 million a year instead of a huge deal.

by Fafnir on Aug 5, 2009 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

Hate to say it, but Baby’s rebound rate is the same as Blount’s (or slightly less), and his eFG% and PER are slightly less than Blount’s, too.

by dslack on Aug 6, 2009 3:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not Comparing Baby To Blount

I would never compare any Celtic to Mark Blount. I was just trying to compare them from a situational point of view. Baby had an exceptional couple of months, but that’s it. He needs to be a better player and prove he’s a better player over a longer period of time before he is paid as a better player. If Baby wants 5 mill and Perk is being paid 4 mill, I don’t think that’s fair. If Danny did that he would need to tear up Perk’s contract and make out a new one for Perk for 10 mill. That’s what Red Auerbach did when Wilt Chamberlain was given a contract for more than Bill Russell was being paid. Red tore up Russell’s contract and paid him $1 more than Chamberlain was making. I also want to add that I do want Baby back for the long term. I think he can be one heck of a player and right now I think he will be the best backup to Perk against bigger, less mobile Centers.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 5, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

he won't get the chance

thats the problem with him, he knows he won’t get a chance to earn the big payday at the end of the this year… thats why he should focus on getting out of Boston as quick as possible.

its obvious C’s won’t give in that easily though

by Zooz on Aug 6, 2009 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree . . .

that his agent probably pushed him into this situation, along with BBDs ego. No one wants to pay the kid for most of the same reasons he dropped in the draft. He’s short, and heavy. Talented? Absolutely.

I wouldn’t compare him to Blount. Danny’s hand was forced with Blount because the owners panicked. Danny wasn’t going to give him that deal.

Also, what did Scal get, five years 15 million? Scal brings more intangibles to the team. I want us to resign BBD, but the kid has to get his head straight. Then again, as Doc has said many times, ‘they don’t call him baby for nothing’.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 5, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ego

I’m not sure it’s as much ego, as immaturity. That’s where his agent should be helping him.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 5, 2009 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you haven't already, be sure to read the linked Boston Herald story, featuring the "tweets."

I can’t imagine how Davis and his agent are thinking he’s doing himself any good by sending off dumbass tweets to a Boston Herald reporter. Part of the reason for having an agent is to keep the emotional player away from the media, and to avoid needless insults directed at the team’s management. It also doesn’t help to sound like a moron to the fans.

by no kidding on Aug 5, 2009 7:37 PM EDT reply actions  

So True

Some of this technology only serves to reduce the value of players. They should just shut up and make their case where it counts, the basketball court.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 5, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

the market decides. big baby should be happy that he has two good knees and a legitimate offer.

hey baby – if you could play above the rim and did not have potential weight issues – you’d be offered more, either by the celtics or another team.

by jurrasicearl on Aug 5, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions  

i vividly remember...

before the season finish he was asked about his future and he said “it’s a business”

well he can call himself unfortunate under this economy and teams are not willing ot pay him what he is looking for… and the celtics is only taking care of its business…

its a business big baby… no need to be frustrated

by hiro on Aug 5, 2009 7:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Its in bostonherald.com

So I take thats officially his twitter?

ridiculous

"....you can't handle The Truth"

by kheeko on Aug 5, 2009 7:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh Big Baby

Stop being a big baby, making little baby tweets on baby twitter and complaining like a big baby about your Big Baby offer and Be a MAN!!! Like when you pushed that baby kid out of the way after your big baby buzzer beater. “I’m just playing Celtics basketball, Doc knows I can play this game, everybody knows I can play this game” Sign the contract and win your multiple titles. Baby’s career is similiar to Bill Russell’s right now. Title in 1st year, missed in 2nd and then ran off 8 straight like the C’s are about to do!!

by star18 on Aug 5, 2009 8:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Whoa

Big Baby—Bill Russell—same sentence? No sentence about basketball skill or knowledge containing the name of Bill Russell should have another name in the same sentence.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 5, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey

But if we roll off 8 titles in a row now Baby & Russell will have something in common.

by star18 on Aug 5, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Different Era

No salary cap, no FA. You can’t do business like that anymore.

by Fafnir on Aug 5, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s really a “Big Baby” after all.

"Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing." - Vince Lombardi

by wild-a on Aug 5, 2009 8:21 PM EDT reply actions  

The Solution

Big Baby should ask to meet with Doc and Danny together or separately and discuss this without his agent present. He will get his best advice from there. Baby should let his feelings be known privately as should Doc and Danny. Doc and Danny have the reputation of being honest and straight forward and Baby should understand this. Then let Baby decide what he wants to do. The Celtics have seemed to have made a decision. They want Baby back at a certain price and probably length of contract. I’m sure there is wiggle room here. Baby really has no choices. I don’t even know if he can go to Europe having been given a qualifying offer. There’s really not much to do except to mend some fences (if any have actually been broken) and move on to a solid career for Glen Davis. I say “solid”. Davis will never be a “franchise” player.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 5, 2009 8:30 PM EDT reply actions  

What makes you think this scenario hasn’t already been played? Danny has said he’s talked with BBD. Doc has been pretty open with BBD. They’ve had two years to prep for this. I think it’s all been said and done. I don’t think the Cs are going to blink. Davis has to understand the business of things. He talks a good talk, but he doesn’t quite get it. He sees himself higher than what the market is yielding, and what it probably ever will yield. The plus side to that, is it’s this kind of confidence that makes BBD compete every night. The down side, well, I think he’s showing a little bit of arrogance, immaturity, and flat out bad judgment.

Either way however, he’s going to be in this league for quite a few more years, and he’s going to make the kind of money most Americans only dream of.

by amenhotep04 on Aug 5, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Get over it BBD and sign the contract, crying and pouting will not get more money.

I love him but he did say “its business”. If he was getting offered 6- 8 million from other teams he would be spouting his " its business" song over and over, smilling and happy to leave town.

So he is learning the hard way, it truly is a business.

by CfanMissippi on Aug 5, 2009 8:51 PM EDT reply actions  

It helps Davis that everyone knows he's a tad goofy.

When he calms down and signs the contract, no one’s going to care anything about what he said during the negotiations. With other guys, we might be recalling the remarks for years. But with him, it’ll be dismissed as Baby just being Baby. So he’s got that goin’ for him. Which is nice.

by no kidding on Aug 5, 2009 9:15 PM EDT reply actions  

His agent is a failure

-For letting BBD shot himself in the foot. Those tweets look like a 2nd grader wrote them.
-for not helping to facilitate a sign and trade. It was obvious that that was how he could get the most money AND playing time to better his future value.
-for claiming all of this interest in BBD when in reality Danny openly called his bluff.
-for not talking to his client about keeping quiet during the process.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 5, 2009 9:33 PM EDT reply actions  

How do you know how is agent worked on a sign and trade?

How do you know how much interest there was in Baby? There were many teams reported as looking, I don’t think any side disputed that. But it was his restricted status that held them back, that’s the C’s doing.

The Celtics could have easily been the party that made a sign and trade impossible, by demanding too much in return.

Have BBD’s tweet’s even been that bad?

by Fafnir on Aug 5, 2009 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes they have been that bad

“I like some of you guys ideas!!!! I going to tell danny (ainge) about some of you guys ideas!!!! I don’t know why then they sign (Williams) before me!!” …. that’s 2nd grader at best.

His agent repeatedly said “these teams are interested” and there were several of those team that flat out said “no, we are not at all interested.” His agent has done a poor job of keeping baby’s immaturity from shining through.

I don’t know everything that went on behind the scenes, but I think it’s been a combination of Danny playing his cards very well, BBD overvaluing himself, and BBD’s agent doing a poor job.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 5, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

ITS Baby's

size we need length(height) at the PF positions, not just scorers off the bench. if he was 7’ feet he could get the MLE from some tean thus a sign and trade option for the Celtics He is a Corless Wiliams type player. PF are tall and quick now a days thus Davis is on the wrong side of the trend

Moses Freeman

by Freeease1 on Aug 5, 2009 9:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Tweetle Dee and Tweetle Dumb

I am too old really to fully understand Tweeting’s purpose. It seems sort of like giving everybody a microphone. Those who are smart and confident never use it, and those who aren’t can quit talking into it. Tweet away and keep digging yourself a hole.

If you are paying your agent to represent you then shut up and let him do it. If he sucks as an agent to the point you are having to tweet to get your point heard and you feel frustrated and confused then get another agent.

If you just want to spout off 24/7 then call Mad Hatter Marbury up and have him put you on his show called “The Circus came to town and I am The Star”

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Aug 5, 2009 9:44 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't like this

Even if he returns, he won’t be a happy camper. Why bother?

by 33-32-00 on Aug 5, 2009 10:23 PM EDT reply actions  

but

an unhappy camper out to prove that he is worth more than his current contract…

he is sort of between a rock and a hard place.

with no sheed here, the best thing to do would probably be to play on the QO, but he is likely to see 10 minutes a game and have his value dwindle.

taking 4/10 might be the best option out there. ainge has impressed here. I’ve seen teams botch this RFA stuff.

by jdpapa3 on Aug 5, 2009 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats tweets make it seem like he wants to come back to boston but hes jus mad hes not gettin him money so i think 2 mill a year shuld get him back

by celtics94 on Aug 6, 2009 2:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't like the poll

Because it doesn’t say how many years.

I’d match a one year MLE deal, a two year 4 million contract, and probably a 3 year 3.5 or so contract. But going four years 12, probably not.

by Fafnir on Aug 5, 2009 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

davis will sign

but he probably will only sign for 1 year. if he was smart and his agen had been smart they would have took into acount of the 2010 free agent class. ihave noticed that a lot of players that wanted to get paid this year didn’t examples former laker ariza, carlos boozer (though he signed is option in utah). next year their will be a lot more money (msaybe not as much as teams originally thought because of the economy) next year will definetly be a better offseason or free agents. look for been to either sign the origanl offer sheet of 1 year.

by NEFOOL on Aug 5, 2009 10:52 PM EDT reply actions  

More money next year?

I’m not so sure next year is going to be a better year for free agents that aren’t getting the max, last month EPSN reported that a “official league memorandum, obtained by ESPN.com, forecasts a dip in basketball-related income in the 2009-10 season of 2.5 percent to 5 percent, which threatens to take the 2010-11 cap down some $5 million to $8 million from last season’s $58.7 million salary cap.”. Looks like there is going to be even less money for marginal FA players.

by Celtzfan8617 on Aug 5, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Less money next year

We’re just getting started with this Depression.

by Greenteam'76 on Aug 6, 2009 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

yea itll be a better free agent class next year also, of course guys like james n ect will get there money, but players like baby wont be any better off if not worse

by celtics94 on Aug 6, 2009 2:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Let him walk

As talented as the guy is, he’s not gonna be happy, Some players play well with chips on their shoulders, Davis is not that type, he thrives positive reinforcement, “rah-rah-rah”, “you can do it”. He’s good. He’s probably worth more than the offer, but not for this team. I miss Leon Powe.

by afflatus on Aug 5, 2009 10:59 PM EDT reply actions  

This whole situation

is a good example of communication in business.

by Ruben Wolkowyski on Aug 5, 2009 11:44 PM EDT reply actions  

baby needs to wait

BBD is in a tough spot. The C’s can match anything he gets offered and the jury is still out is last year was really a breakout or just the case of a guy playing above his capabilities….

BBD needs to focus on his game, play out this year at whatever terms and then see where’s he at next year. This year he has no leverage…

by Zooz on Aug 6, 2009 1:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Sheldon

they sign sheldon, with a vet minimum, and are now ready to make Baby an offer. With Sheldon on board, Baby clearly does not have the Celts over a barrel. With Scal, you already have 5 bigs. Frankly I almost think Frazicas is better than Baby.

by Bozo on Aug 6, 2009 2:26 AM EDT reply actions  

"Let him walk" would be stupid

I haven’t read the tweets but I’m sure you are all right that he sounds immature. But 1. he’s a young guy who got minutes in year 1 from a coach who doesn’t go young much. 2. He came back in year 2 with an improved jump shot. 3. He showed that even lacking height he could body play well against Duncan and other good low post players. I could care less about his rebounding per vs Mark Blount. That is an insult to Big Baby.

Here’s a flat out rule of business that has been drilled into me over the years….It is much better to hold onto a customer than to try and win them back. Same with NBA talent. If someone offered him the MLE, I’d match it. I agree with everyone that he’s not worth that but you don’t let talent go. Losing Big Baby, age 23, and signing Joe Smith, for ex, is not smart.

It has made for interesting blog comments but the fact is Blount was selling in a seller’s market and Big baby is selling into a buyer’s market. I’d vote for 4 years $12 mil.

by Wildblu1 on Aug 6, 2009 8:30 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

My comment had nothing to do with his talent

It is important that he is happy with his job. The guy is emotional. He wants to be wanted and wants the Celtics to offer him something that makes it look like they WANT him and not just give a low ball offer which really makes it look like they are taking advantage of the lack of other team’s interest in him (something I cannot fault the Celtics for doing). The Celtics have made it hard for other teams to simply make him an offer because the assume the Celtics will match it. But the strategy seems to be to scare everyone from offering him anything until all teams have filled their roster, leaving Davis to sign anything they offer. Good business move? Maybe. But as emotional as this guy is, the Celtics might get what they pay for in performance.

by afflatus on Aug 6, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you are sugesting BBD will be a slacker with a smaller contract...

then I find that hard to believe. If anythnig I think the guy would work even harder to get that bigger payday next year.

I think a lot of people here are making too big a deal over Baby’s emotional status and what impact that could have. All NBA players learn that this is a business like any other. Negotations happens, that’s the nature of things. Does BBD need to “grow up”? Yeah, maybe but that’s his problem. I doubt the outcome will impact his performance on the basketball court, so I’m not concerned.

by Surferdad on Aug 6, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Signing him for anywhere near what you want would be stupid

In your example, BBD is not a customer. We are the customers, and we pay for the product on the floor and in the media.

While you think holding on to everyone is some method of holding on to assets, this is not true. Let’s say the Celtics signed BBD to the full MLE, like you said they should do just to have him as an asset. His contract (especially considering the low minutes he’ll get) will adversely affect the resigning of Rondo, others, and bringing in better players in years to come. Because of this, BBD and his contract become a “liability” and detriment to the product put on the floor for us customers.

If the Celtics let him walk then they have that money/asset available to purchase additional players now or in the years to come.

Personally I think we accept BBD back for the qualifying offer, or let him walk. Either of those two scenarios would IMO give the Celtics the best available asset.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 6, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

i hope we keep baby. he’s got his upside and his downside but he knows our system and he fits in with his play. he also hustles. not enough is being said about his smarts and passing ability.

by nazzbo on Aug 6, 2009 9:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Rating BB's skills.

   He sets a HUGE pick!

   He can guard HUGE opposing centers – EG: Howard, Shaq etc.

   If left alone, he can hit a mid-range shot (and supposedly has worked on extending his range this summer).

  He can’t rebound. He can’t defend a quick or tall forward. EG: Orlando’s R Lewis ate him alive in the playoffs. He is prone to making ill-advised fouls. He can’t get a shot off when he is right under the basket if any of the opposing bigs are guarding him.

I’d keep him because of him being able to guard the big guys. Name how many other guys can do that?

by Dipper on Aug 6, 2009 10:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Well

Shelden Williams can. Seen him do it against Howard, Shaq, & Bynum (kind of weird to see, actually).

Baby should be kept, just not for more than he’s worth. BBD thinks he’s worth more than he actually is + its hard for a lot of RFAs in the market. The days of getting overpaid for a handful of games are over.

by Genesis336 on Aug 6, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Baby's value

Baby has the skills of a solid all around Forward coming off the bench. His offensive touch is above average. Holding him back will be the weight issue and what he gives up in height.

2.5 for 2 years is a huge raise and a fair deal in this economy.

by LuckyNumber07 on Aug 6, 2009 10:54 AM EDT reply actions  

This Is Going On Too Long

Baby should get permission to talk to another team about a sign and trade. Let that team determine a salary and then see what Danny will want. In other words, let Baby do the work to initiate a sign and trade. Maybe that way he’ll see that he has a good deal here, whatever it is. Baby should realize he has no choices left and it seems we will have a disgruntled player on our hands. Danny has been good about this sort of thing and might be able to get draft picks in return, at a minimum.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 6, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Not your typical PF

First off, I like BBD…as the season went on I liked him even more…I don’t this twitter crap though!

He just isn’t the typical PF who can play the inside game, and more importantly above the rim! I don’t know how many times last year, I couldn’t beleive he didn’t flush it, and instead missed or got blocked.
A PF needs to be rebounder, and able to play D on the “new age” PF with quickness (like Lewis). I question if he can cover Shaq, as Dipper mentioned mainly due to hieght, but agree with his body, he’s valuable against some bigs….He really needs to work on foot speed more than anything at this point…

Having said that, he proved he can be a force and would be a valuble piece off the bench this year. He forces the defender to cover his mid range shot (except when he hit the buzzer beater against the Magic) which opens it up for the bigs, or for the slashers.

Going foward I’m also not sure he should/can be a starter but could make a living be a 6th man for a long time…any comments?

I think 3 million a year is fair…but if you look at what TA and Scal are making…is 3 enough?

by Chauky on Aug 6, 2009 11:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Comparing Salaries To Other Players On The Same Team
I think 3 million a year is fair…but if you look at what TA and Scal are making…is 3 enough?

If you start comparing player salaries to each other, what about Perk? If Baby gets 3 mill because Scals gets 3 mill, than what is Perk worth if they play this game.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 6, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Mr. Davis is pouting. I think his agent is. They are starting the dance. Everything will be fine by October. And that is why people have agents.

Bottom line is – most of that additional money goes to his agent and taxes.

by johnnymost on Aug 6, 2009 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Just A Thought

With all this contract crap going on, which IMHO would be resolved by now if Baby were smart about it, what is BBD doing to improve his game this summer? I read where he is working on conditioning and that is good. But because of the contract stuff he didn’t attend the Olympic camp, which would have been a good experience. He also mentions in his “Tweet” that he hasn’t been to Boston. Well, Clifford Ray is in Boston and it would serve Baby well to be working with Mr. Ray today.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Aug 6, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

If I’m Danny, the years are almost as important as the per-year figure. A 3 year/$12M deal – I think they match, but 4yrs/$16M, he lets him walk. Shorter contracts = more flexibility, which we all know Danny prizes. BBD seems to be the kind of guy who’s going to perform best in a contract year, anyway.

by theBird on Aug 6, 2009 12:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Soon we will know what the amt was the Celtics offered BBD

The two sides will come to an agreement as this is all in negotiations; I’m confident
BBD will be signed for a reasonable contract.

Smart move by Danny Ainge to bring in Sheldon Williams while the BBD agent
is working on a deal with the Celtics; good insurance plan & not pinning us into
a corner.

by OCsWestCeltic on Aug 6, 2009 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a smart move

for multiple reasons. I’m impressed he got Sheldon too, and think he’ll be the valuable big off the bench that so many people were clamoring for.

by TomHamilton30 on Aug 6, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Poor BBD and his agent especially

are being taken behind the shed by Ainge.

Eventually he’ll be back relegating Sheldon to Scal territory somewhere near the end of bench.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Aug 6, 2009 1:48 PM EDT reply actions  

So...

This was a fake BBD and people need to stop writing stories using tweets, am I wrong?

Please write a story about this, because it is blowing my mind.

by stevenfuzz on Aug 6, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
"We really have only 2 options to keep winning."
Small
Celtics vs. Heat - ECF Matchup
Small
How Avery Bradley's absence affects everyone else
Small
Thoughts on Celtics vs. Heat
Small
Already Doubting The Celtics?
Small
Start Pavlovic over Ray to cover Dirty Wade
Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi