The Globe Will Make You Pay For Online Content
The Boston Globe will soon begin charging for its Web site, publisher P. Steven Ainsley told the paper's union bosses yesterday as the Globe's parent New York Times [NYT] Co. confirmed in a regulatory filing that the money-losing Hub broadsheet is for sale.
Boston Sports Media Watch looks at the story as well.
There have been a lot of rumblings recently that more and more newspapers and news outlets are going to attempt to raise their falling fortunes by limiting access to their online work and charging readers a fee to access and read it. An Associated Press (another news agency looking to get more protective of their content) article this morning reports that News Corp.’s newspapers will also soon be charging for content.
While I can see that their logic in not wishing to keep giving away their content and work for free, I have my doubts as to whether this is going to be successful. The AP article above has Rupert Murdoch pointing to the Wall Street Journal and WSJ.com as a successful model for paid content that the rest of News Corp. will be trying to emulate.
Note: In case you were wondering, CelticsBlog has no plans of ever going into the pay-for-content business.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
BIG MISTAKE… There are enough free sport information outlets to get info from. I’ll go back to buying a newspaper before I pay for content online!!
I agree
Very Big mistake, people are just going to read the Herald now.
Standing up for the little People
PS: I am actually from Boston.
Newspapers missed their chance to charge for online content 10 years ago. Now, with blogs specializing in specific sports, and teams, the information we crave will be readily available with little-to-no difference in quality. If anything, the quality is even better on well-run blogs (such as this one).
The only way charging for online content would be feasible for newspapers, specifically the sports section, is if franchises and leagues somehow colluded to exclude non-traditional media from covering the games in person. Even then I still don’t think this will succeed.
I specializes in grammar fail.
No Chance
I wouldn’t pay the Globe, Herald or any website for news. I like the Globe online sports section but not enough to pay for it. This is a bad idea that will fail.
The poll as of this post says it all..
Some people would consider it the beginning of the end.
I think it’s closer to the end of the end. : )
For sports content, probably not, but
if the newspaper industry can’t figure out how to make money off what they produce, namely news content and opinion, newspapers will become extinct.
Do you want your local and state government to operate without local papers as watchdogs? Or do you trust the government to just put out information, which blogs can then digest? It costs money to send reporters to city hall, zoning meetings, state houses, etc.
Cragislist has cut out one leg of the newspaper industry – classified ads. This bad economy is threatening the other, display ads. Papers are cutting reporting and editing jobs like crazy. If I have to pay $20 a month on the internet to insure that my local statewide daily stays in business, I will do it.
Excellent Post TripleOT
To have a free society you need a free press— aand lots of it. The reporting on TV and on web-based media is almost uniformly shallow. Nothing provides in-depth investigative coverage like a good newspaper.
I get the Globe via home delivery and those prices have gone through the roof asa well: from $31 a month to $47 per month in less than a year. But I will continue to pay tht as well.
I Agree Triple OT
The 93% that say “No” contain some true hardliners, no doubt, but most WILL fall into paying a penny a click or an annual fee or whatever. I am to the right of virtually every writer the Globe publishes (and I’m not very right) except Jeff Jacoby so why would I care if it goes down. Answer, see Brickowski above, the Globe’s Spotlight Team is absolutely essential. Corrupt politicians, lazy firemen, greedy drug companies etc have all had their butts kicked in public and we can’t lose that or the future gets darker indeed.
Agree 100%
Newspapers do a crappy job of covering local politics, but they’re the ONLY thing that even tries.
The lack of information and investigative reporting about local government is a serious social problem.
I doubt charging for online content will work, though. Newspapers have been so mismanaged for so long that they’ve squandered their franchises.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
Never
I would never pay for online content or even the paper itself. If there’s a copy at the gym I might take a look. But I can find any information elsewhere. (like here) The opinion articles aren’t important. And politically, all they seem to do is tell us how great Obama is. So much for being a watchdog.





























