Love Hate Relationship
I gotta tell ya. Rooting for Rasheed Wallace is going to be a very, very odd experience for me.
I generally have a lot of respect for players in the NBA. I mean, I'm a Celtics fan first, but I'm a fan of the game as well. So as long as we aren't playing them, I can admire Duncan's steady dominance, Wade's relentlessness, and CP3's court vision. Kevin Garnett was my favorite non-Celtic for years before he became my favorite new Celtic. But there are some ready made villains in the league that were easy to hate.
Now, I use the term "hate" in the most non-personal way possible (if that makes any sense at all). I don't know these people personally so it is hard to pass judgment on their moral character from watching them for a few hours a week on TV. So I base my haterade solely on their behavior on the basketball court and things directly related to the league (not to mention a few rivalry-related biases on my part).
The short list is pretty unsurprising for a Celtics fan. Kobe has been there for years for obvious reasons. Artest going to the Lakers is a perfect Molotov cocktail and I'll gleefully dance on the ashes of their season if things go as I hope. Vince Carter and Carlos Boozer are both on the list in part because of how they handled the business side of things in the past. Oh yeah, and it used to be that I could count on hating everyone on the Pistons.
But now we've got the biggest Bad Boy of them all right here in Boston. This guy was the next generation Bill Laimbeer. He fit the role of evil villain to a T (pun intended). He was, ...no scratch that ...he is brash, cocky, self-important, ...and maddeningly good.
Say the Celtics were up by two touchdowns on the Pistons in the 3rd quarter. I would find myself laughing at how invisible Sheed had been thus far and mocking his "we'll turn it on when it matters" attitude. Then he would turn it on, knock down 3 three pointers and they'd tie it up in 5 minutes. Drove me nuts.
Now, if all goes according to plan, he'll be driving fans of other teams nuts. That, I think I can get used to.
Of course I'm going into this with my eyes wide open. I know that he'll coast when the stakes aren't high. I know that he'll melt down over a bad call at the most inopportune time possible. I know on offense he'll treat the painted area like it is radioactive. I know these things because I've seen them for years from the other side.
In fact, maybe the biggest reason why I think this could work is because we all know these things up front. There's been an odd sort of vibe coming from Pistons fans during his departure. They saw the writing on the wall all last year and so did Sheed, which at least partially explains why he sleep-walked through the playoffs. I think Detroit fans weren't exactly happy to see him go, but they were understandably relieved that they didn't have to go through any of that stuff with him anymore.
In Boston, we know his warts well. We also know how well he has performed in spite of those warts. We aren't counting on him to be our leading scorer and we won't bother asking him to spend time in the paint. Baring unforeseen events, he'll be coming off the bench. He'll slot perfectly into that high post passer/shooter role. He'll hit some of those dagger shots that Posey was so good at 2 years ago. He'll fit right into the team defense and team ego mentality. He's yet another star player that is willing to (and even eager to) put winning ahead of selfish interests. In that way he really makes sense as a Boston Celtic.
Besides, the rest of the league and its fans hate us already. They've all turned on our stars as if somehow KG just started barking at people once he got to Boston. Nobody cared that Pierce talked trash till he started backing it up with wins. Nobody cared that Perkins wore a scowl 24/7 until they had to see it in on prime time in the playoffs. You think adding Sheed is going to make people hate us any more than they already do? And even if they do, would you care? It only fuels the "us against the world" mentality. Nobody outside Boston liked Red either, but they respected him.
So it will be odd rooting for Rasheed but it also makes a great deal of sense. Love it or hate it, Sheed is a Celtic. Look out league.
Also see: Kevin Garnett | Ray Allen | Paul Pierce | Rajon Rondo | Kendrick Perkins
More Sheed: Golden St. of Mind | Pistons.com
0 recs |
87 comments
|
Comments
I used to hate Sheed, now i root for him. He’s got inmense talent. Good article!
by greenwise on Sep 2, 2009 6:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's
the name on the front of the jersey you root for
by Black Jack Pershing on Sep 2, 2009 6:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Disagree Jeff
Sheed is not even close to Laimbeer. Other players hated Laimbeer. In fact, there’s still friction there. Sheed is a cupcake. Behind the scenes everyone likes him. Laimbeer is not that way.
Given the history of Rambis, McHale, and Laimbeer, I can’t help but think that Laimbeer being named assistant coach at Minnesota was a cold slap in the face to McHale, even though I do believe Laimbeer is a good coach.
Nevertheless, my point to all this is that while you may have hated Sheed in the past, to place him in the company of guys like Laimbeer or even a Mahorn is a stretch at best.
Sorry. I know I’m taking one sentence and running with it, but I guess that is symptomatic of the hate that still is there for players like Laimbeer.
by amenhotep04 on Sep 2, 2009 6:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
I agree that the level of hate for Laimbeer was off the charts
here’s my justification: “next generation Bill Laimbeer” indicates a sequel, which we all know never lives up to the original
;)
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Sep 2, 2009 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny
That was funny. Yeah, with the exception of Godfather II; and in my personal feeling, Star Trek Voyager, you’re absolutely right.
Good comeback.
by amenhotep04 on Sep 2, 2009 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not so sure
He’s the man you love to hate, but wish he was on your team. Explain why Garnett, Paul, Ray, and the Celtics Brass would actually all fly to Sheed’s home and recruit someone if they thought he was a bad apple?
Chemistry is very important in basketball. We have a perception of Sheed, but it’s not necessarily true what we think.
Here is something many people here don’t know about Sheed coming to Boston. Guess who had a big part with him coming here? Chauncey Billups. I heard how Billups raved about his work ethic, intensity, knowledge of the game. How he would go to war with Sheed knowing Sheed had his back. Once Billups was traded, Sheed knew that Detriot was going in a different direction and Detriot wasn’t going forward in trying to win a Championship. Heard that Sheed has a huge desire to win and doesn’t tolerate others around him who just loath around. It depresses him and he retracts backwards.
Never the less, he will improve this Celtic Team tremendously even at his age and bring an excitement to the floor, one which teams coming into Boston will fear; because how many teams can Boost someone like Rasheed, Daniels, House, Davis coming off the bench. They will just wear teams down.
Love him or Hate him, He is ours to cheer for now!
by Ancient Red on Sep 2, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hate laimbeer as well amenhotep04 - always will. it's LAME-BEER anyway
Sheed? I think he has more class. I am hoping to love him in green. My worry about him is does he have anything left in the tank. He seems smart enough to get by on mostly great court sense/awareness, years of experience in being in the right spot and reading “D” and a soft shot to make up for the aging legs and back. It’s only September ….ughhh
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Sep 2, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Po!
Yeah, I think Sheed will have enough this year. The other years I’m a bit concerned about. But I envision gradually almost a ‘play by committee’ format if Doc can keep egos in check. So everyone will play fewer minutes, but will be able to have enough left in the tank to really play well during the minutes they’re on the floor.
At least that would be cool IMHO.
by amenhotep04 on Sep 2, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hate? You didnt love ‘Sheed, Chanucy, & co handing Phil, Shaq, and Kobe their hats back in 04, thus delaying the run on Red’s record?
by Tenacious D on Sep 2, 2009 7:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
back in 04
we were an afterthought – so yeah, it was easier to root for the Pistons than the Lakers
but for the most part the Pistons were a very easy bunch to hate
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Sep 2, 2009 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
That’s an odd comment coming from someone named Raef.
I agree with Tenacious D, I never disliked the Pistons solely because I was too young to watch the original bad boys, and the new team I’ll always remember from 2004 for being the antithesis to the scummy Kobe-Shaq-Malone-Payton Lakers that were “destined” for the four-peat.
Big brother no longer needs to watch, because the world is convinced he is.
by Schupac on Sep 2, 2009 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The “Raef” moniker is meant to be ironic. Guess it isn’t as funny as I thought.
by Raef on Sep 2, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sheed is just as good a player as KG is right now! Sheed played in the paint as long as Larry Brown was in Detroit. Give Detroit credit there defense back then was better than ours was two years ago. I read in one of the blogs where Sheed was having a conversation with his wife about should he come to Boston. She asked him if he was ready to make the sacrifice to do the right thing. That was her question to him. To me that is powerful. Sheed searched his soul after encouragement from the big three and decided not to retire. Money is not his motivation, stats either. Trying to win is his motivation.
I think this years defense will be one of the best in NBA history. Look you don’t think Baby or Sheldon Williams is going to patrol the paint when Perk goes out do you. That’s the sacrifice his wife asked him about. His enthusiasm for the game died not his ability to play the game.
by tyquinton on Sep 2, 2009 9:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not to make much out of nothing… but I remember reading about that same conversation, and being kind of worried about a guy whose wife has to ask him if he’s ready to make the sacrifice to do the right thing.
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
at least someones asking him, in KGS case, everyone, including the refs in the league let him get away with as much nonsense is anybody in NBA history…sheed gets away with nothing
by latin on Sep 2, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
age
one Piston fan on twitter pointed out that I didn’t really cover the issue of his age – and that’s a fair point
he’s not the Sheed he used to be, but I think we know that going in as well
he can still hit the 3 and play defense and do what he does, just not with the same explosiveness he used to have
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Sep 2, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’ve never hated Sheed myself, I absolutely loved him when he was with the Trail Blazers, he was one of my favorite players in the league…. the one time i “hated” him was our championship run 2 seasons ago, because I feared his ability
by latin on Sep 2, 2009 9:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Perspective from a Pistons fan...
Of course I’m going into this with my eyes wide open. I know that he’ll coast when the stakes aren’t high. I know that he’ll melt down over a bad call at the most inopportune time possible. I know on offense he’ll treat the painted area like it is radioactive. I know these things because I’ve seen them for years from the other side.
In fact, maybe the biggest reason why I think this could work is because we all know these things up front. There’s been an odd sort of vibe coming from Pistons fans during his departure. They saw the writing on the wall all last year and so did Sheed, which at least partially explains why he sleep-walked through the playoffs. I think Detroit fans weren’t exactly happy to see him go, but they were understandably relieved that they didn’t have to go through any of that stuff with him anymore.
I certainly don’t blame your optimism; in fact, I completely understand it. Piston fans have been telling ourselves the same thing at the start of each of the past three seasons. This year, it will be different … and here’s why …
However, don’t fall prey to blind optimism; I think there are still two big reasons to be skeptical of Sheed.
First, he’s old, and that was never as obvious as it was last season. His three point shot won’t be affected; he’s a set shooter. And given his height and wingspan, he can still score in the post (on occasion). And, he can still defend in the post. However, his off-the-ball and help defense were atrocious last season. If he does turn out to be the sixth man (which seems obvious to me), Sheed and Big Baby in tandem, well, that kinda scares me.
Big Baby is an awful rebounder for PF, and Sheed’s rebounding ability is declining. Reason for skepticism number one.
Number two is what you alluded to where I quoted you above. Sheed is mentally weak. He’s a fantastic teammate, don’t get me wrong, and he’s probably the most misunderstood player in the game. Further, when things are going right, there’s no one I’d rather have on my bench running his mouth and encouraging his teammates.
But, when things go wrong … well, lookout. I would have hated to see how he handled the Chicago series last season, for example. I can only imagine he’d have been chucked from at least one or two games. So, reason number two for pessimism.
But, as you mentioned on Twitter, Sheed is being asked to play a very specific role — and unlike a lot of aging NBA stars, his ego won’t get in the way of that. Sheed is a team player all the way — something that gets lost in all his ranting and raving — and that’s not something you would know unless he wore the jersey you cheered for.
He will stretch the floor on offense, and he will make open shots (He will benefit from Pierce and Rondo immensely in those respects). And if KG can light a fire under his rump, you might even see some help defense and Sheed-of-old rebounding.
All of that to say, there will be moments when you love Sheed, and I expect your fans will adopt the “Sheed” chant that became a staple of the Palace for these past few seasons. But there will be moments when you hate Sheed — those ‘meaningless’ regular season games in which he mails it in, those crucial moments when he implodes and gives points away because of his tech’s, and those moments when you feel lik you yourself could have given better help defense or more effort to secure a loose ball.
But, his time in the D was over, and we all knew it. Given that we don’t have a snowball’s chance of winning anything significant over the next couple seasons, I don’t have a problem wishing Sheed the best as he leaves. I won’t cheer for him, mind you, because he will be wearing Green and White (I’m a U of M fan as well as a Piston fan, so I have certain aversions to that color combo!), but part of me will be happy if he flourishes in a new role, in a new place, with a fresh start.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 9:58 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
thanks for the Detroit perspective
appreciate it
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Sep 2, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
awful rebounder for PF...
"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said
by Birdbrain on Sep 2, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Baby’s rebounding numbers are far below average with respect to other PF’s. Any rebounding statistic you look at tells you the same thing.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't consider them awful but, that's just me.
"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said
by Birdbrain on Sep 2, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In what way?
. . . Sheed and Big Baby in tandem, well, that kinda scares me.
Awful? or Intimidating? or Ridiculous? BTW I too am a U of M alum; only thing I liked about that other team was the colors.
by OldCeltFan on Sep 2, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was horribly unclear. My bad.
What I meant to say was that if I were a C’s fan, I would worry about a Sheed + Big Baby frontcourt — because that front court won’t rebound the ball very well (on either side of the ball). You would also struggle with help D (assuming Sheed continues to play sub-part help D).
You would have shooting range, though.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Will be curious to see how a rebounding backcourt compliments such a frontcourt.
by OldCeltFan on Sep 2, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rondo
Yes, Rondo’s rebounding ability might be enough to make up the difference.
Rondo is a phenomenal talent. I was floored by that rumor earlier this summer … Rondo+Allen for Rip+Tay+Stuckey … If I’m Joe D, I might pull the trigger. Rondo’s the type of PG you might be able to build a team around.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And...
…who are the 3 and 4th bigs on the Pistons this year? I’ve got to tell you, I’m worried about that, for you.
by stevenfuzz on Sep 15, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BigBaby is an awful rebounder?
the word awful is a bit strong but it was nice to hear from an articulate Piston fan. Thanks as well. You post was very well put (mostly). Is “Articulate Piston Fan” an oxymoron? No wait….. that would be “GM Isiah Thomas”
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Sep 2, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes awful
When you consider that is only niche on defense is the ability to physically keep big/slow centers away from the basket a bit, he inherently needs to be a good rebounder. Instead, he is well below where he should be, especially on defensive rebounds.
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 2, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For crying out loud.
I hate to nit-pick a reasoned and welcomed contribution from our brother in Detroit, but if Wallace and Davis come up short as a backup frontcourt tandem in the NBA (emphasis on the word “backup”), then I don’t know crapola.
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just rebounding (and help D)
no kidding,
I tried to keep my comments very specific — Sheed struggled mightily last year to rotate on D. I don’t expect him to get younger and thus improve in that area next season. And Sheed’s rebounding numbers aren’t bad, just not great.
Davis is also a slow help defender, and he’s a poor defensive rebounder.
However, on the other end of the floor, they will both stretch the floor and knock down jumpshots, as I mentioned before. If you pair those two bigs with Pierce and/or Rondo, you have a potent penetrate and pitch / pick-and-pop offensive scheme in place.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand your concerns, but I suspect you’re thinking in terms of front-line players. In terms of a backup tandem, name me a better pair in the league. And yes, even in terms of rebounding and help-defense.
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
San Antonion
I’m not sure how the starting line-up / backup situation will work in SA, or if Blair will be as prolific a rebounder in the season as he was in summer league.
But, if McDyess and Blair are the back-up front court in SA — then lookout NBA (assuming health for the rest of the veterans on the squad).
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's it?
You were dismissive of Wallace and Davis as a backup tandem, but when pressed to name a single better backup tandem, you could only point to the possible pairing up of McDyess with an untested rookie? Sheesh.
Look, how ’bout we just say you perhaps put your concerns about Wallace and Davis a tad too strongly.
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Memo to Jeff Clark: a possibility for a Christmas graphic.
In discussing this topic, and as one who, out of respect, tends to demur from using nicknames for players (at least on blogs), I kept using the names Wallace and Davis. But in doing so, I was hearing something echoing about in the back of my head. Then I realized, that was the names of two film characters, the showbiz duo of Bob Wallace and Phil Davis, as played by Bing Crosy and Danny Kaye, in the holiday classic “White Christmas.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Christmas_(film)
Now I suppose most of the commenters here are too young to have that movie enshrined in their memories, but it’s stuck in mine. So anyways, there might be a good opportunity to employ an associated photograph sometime around December.
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The motion is made,
Henceforth, when subbed in together, Wallace and Davis should be referred to as “White Christmas.”
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn’t come here to fight, no kidding, just to make some observations about Sheed as someone who’s watched him very closely for several years. I’m not being dismissive of them; I’ve acknowledge the value I perceive in both of them. But I’ve been equally honest about the deficiencies I perceive.
I think Davis is a very bad rebounder (because that’s what the numbers say). I value rebounding quite highly when it comes to evaluating players — and personally, I don’t think Davis’ scoring (IF he can continue scoring as he did in the Playoffs) makes up for his rebounding deficiencies. In short, I think Davis is a bad PF. Further, he’s a relatively inefficient scorer when compared to other PFs.
Wallace is still a solid 6th man, and he will help the Celtics, no doubt about it — but my original post wasn’t arguing that he wouldn’t help you, just that you shouldn’t be too quick to look past his shortcomings blindly. He brings some good things, but he brings some really bad things as well. As a Pistons fan, I have overvalued Sheed for at least two seasons; I think Celtics fans are doing the same thing right now, and I empathize.
As I see it, you have 1 excellent big in KG, 1 very good big in Perkins, and a good big in Sheed. I think Davis is sub-part.
I only named one team ’cause I was in a hurry. Here are other teams that I think have that are at least equal to the Celtics:
Orlando, Cleveland, LA San Antonio, Portland (potentially, at least when healthy), Utah.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, you made the effort, and thank you. But I don’t think the Celtics’ frontcourt backups are hardly a weak link that anyone needs to lose sleep over. Peace.
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
frontcourt backups are hardly a weak link that anyone needs to lose sleep over
I agree. You are certainly top-tier. Peace.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
brgulker great posts
please don’t get discouraged, and I hope you keep posting here. You were hands down the best post on this topic, and yes you were very specific. I don’t know why people above are struggling to understand that you were speaking in regards to rebounding mostly, and a touch of rotating on D.
Your point was very valid. It’s the same as saying “the second unit is energetic and good on defense, but struggles to score in a half court offense.” (as an example) It doesn’t say the players are bad, but that there are some limitations to strategize around. In fact, rarely is there that level of analysis here from posters. Instead you get the “i don’t like..” etc.
Honestly I doubt BBD & Rasheed will get that much playing time together. I’d anticipate sheed/perk/KG all subbing out rather equally… there is no need for a 1 for 1 sub for the starters.
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 2, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The terminolgy was awful IMO
just because you agree doesn’t make it right.
"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said
by Birdbrain on Sep 2, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
terminology?
it’s a matter of opinion, but at least his opinion is backed by stats. In addition, what I didn’t get was that people took that one comment and blew it up to mean “the celtics bench big men are awful,” when that is what he absolutely did not say. THAT is what I was trying to correct and had trouble figuring out why no-one understood his comment.
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 3, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Tom.
Honestly I doubt BBD & Rasheed will get that much playing time together. I’d anticipate sheed/perk/KG all subbing out rather equally… there is no need for a 1 for 1 sub for the starters.
Assuming exactly equal minutes for Sheed+KG+Perkins, that’s 32 minutes per game. I doubt Sheed plays that many minutes per night, especially early in the season. I think 26 is a realistic number for him.
Your point about not paring Sheed and Davis is a good one, though. When Davis does play (and I expect him to get the fewest minutes of the bunch, as you do), it makes good sense to pair him with KG/Perkins.
The scary lineup (scary as in potentially freakishly good) front court combo — and the combo that will most likely finish games for you — is KG/Sheed. I don’t know how any stops Rondo + Allen + Pierce + KG + Sheed. Maybe LA can. Maybe Cleveland (although the Shaq + Z thing isn’t worked out yet). Other than that, that’s a deadly lineup to field for the last 6 minutes of the game.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The numbers don't lie
Master Po,
IMO, Davis’ statistics speak for themselves. He is very well below average with respect to rebounds when compared to league averages.
I don’t like the Celtics, and I won’t try to hide that, but I don’t think it’s bias creeping in on this one.
by brgulker on Sep 2, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Need For This Article
I hate to be negative, Jeff, but do you remember Johnny Most. There are two types of players in this league; Celtics and other. We love all Celtics, we hate all others. Sheed is now a Celtic and by definition he’s the greatest guy and greatest player in the world.
Before July he was the worst of the worst (except for Laimbeer and a few other dirities)
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Sep 2, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
These are my feelings.
I love Sheed.
"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said
by Birdbrain on Sep 2, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember him vividly
and you are right – he’s one of us now
just saying that will take some gettin’ used to
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Sep 2, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
of all the players in the league
I never wanted Bill Lambeer on my team, but I would have taken Rick Mahorn in a heart beat
by Ancient Red on Sep 2, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tommy
Tommy thinks Rick Mahorn is an okay guy so that’s good enough for me. McFilthy or McNasty, if he were to be a Celtic he would be McWonderful.
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Sep 2, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
totally agree
never would I want that scumbag Lambeer anywhere in the Celtics organization.
Honestly I don’t see where this “hate” of rasheed comes from. He doesn’t play dirty at all, let alone play dirty to make up for lack of talent (lambeer, bowen, etc). In addition, when did he ever go out of his way to blast the Celtics verbally or with taunting (like Reggie Miller vs NYK)?
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 2, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't
how about being completely classless at all times on the court. No wonder you think BBD is awful rebounder you have poor eye sight.
He’s a C now so I love him.
"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said
by Birdbrain on Sep 2, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what are you talking about?
I was agree’ing that I didn’t want Lambeer whatsover, and that any analogy of Lambeer and ‘sheed is not very accurate. Lambeer was a very dirty player who was a nemesis of the Celtics. I’ve never associated Rasheed Wallace, at any point in his career, with the term “anti-Celtics” or “hate”. I may not like certain aspects of his attitude, but I not only welcomed Rasheed Wallace, I love him being on the team.
My eyesight is great. I can’t watch college basketball b/c I see a million mistakes a game made. I love watching the celtics b/c they have always been my team, and because lately they’ve been playing such high caliber ball that it is extremely enjoyable to watch as each play unfolds. I also see BBD miss a lot of defensive rotations (or get there too late), and I see that he is a bad rebounder defensively. Unlike your “eyesight” I have very basic rebounding numbers to back it up. The Piston’s fan saw it too, so maybe you just have BBD colored glasses on. Pls read my post before you blast me.
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 3, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeff, Are You Used To Him Yet?
If not, how long will it take? Don’t know the thingy for (Laugh!)
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Sep 2, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sidney Wicks and Curtis Rowe
I hated them when they were wearing green. There were a few others as well. It’s a matter of work ethic and attitude. Blount is on that list as well.
by amenhotep04 on Sep 2, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everything Was Peachy Until
You had to remind us of these 3. Curtis Rowe was famous for saying “they don’t put w’s and l’s on your paycheck”. They were both good players who wouldn’t play. Meanwhile a crippled Cowens was doing all the rebounding. The only positive they brought was that Max had just come to the team and he, with Cowens, did all the work so Max was able to develop his game early on. Max didn’t have a budget until
until Bill Fitch took over and taught Max how to really play.
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Sep 2, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great pic Jeff. Thanks!
That picture finally made the off season sink into my thick skull. It may be comforting for foes to wonder how old and worn out some Celts may be, but Sheed on the bench has to create trepidation. That tenacity, in green, will make foes wish they would be facing Lambeer and Mahorn. It is not just Sheed – it is what comes with him, the package around him – that will give foes pause. If Sheed starts having fun with his new playmates, watch out world.
I’ll bet Lebron doesn’t sleep well on October 26th.
by OldCeltFan on Sep 2, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree With TrueGreen
I never hated Lambeer, Ruland or Mahorn either. In fact, I always wanted the Celtics to get Mahorn.
Dainty players don’t win championships, as Jim Loscutoff would have been the first to tell you. In fact, the current Celtics could use an enforcer other than Kendrick Perkins, who has become too valuable to risk ejection by committing too many hard fouls.
by Brickowski on Sep 2, 2009 11:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Laimbeer
I agree on Ruland and Mahorn. They played hard. But I do think Laimbeer crossed the line and was dirty. You don’t see Robert Parish beating up on many guys, but he did beat on Laimbeer. And if you discuss Laimbeer with Larry, do it from a distance……..A nice trip down memory lane.
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Sep 2, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sheed!
I love Sheed. I always love-hated him. He was my biggest love-hate. I used to love-hate him even more than KG.
I understand that Sheed hasn’t played in the paint much recently, but, he has an incredible low post game. I’m not talking about his dunks and explosive plays from years passed. He has some truly brilliant text-book low post moves. Oh so sweet.
I’m just saying, don’t completely discount Sheeds inside game.
by stevenfuzz on Sep 2, 2009 11:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I had always thought of Sheeds inside moves like Ray Allens jump shot. Perfection.
by stevenfuzz on Sep 2, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
same.. he frightened me at times
After watching ‘sheed in the post I always thought, "damn, I hope he doesn’t post up again.. there is no way we are going to effeciently stop that."
I really hope he’s as motivated as he says, which I think he will be. This will be the best season yet, IMO, if healthy. The growing pains will be out of the way and it will provide really elite basketball.
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 2, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sheed
When Sheed is in his role, he’s a champion. He helped to beat a stacked Laker team in 2004 and he was awesome when he led UNC to an NCAA championship in ‘93. His inside moves are a big bonus. He’s more gangster than the other Celtics but he has the potential to play like a champ.
by MonkDonald on Sep 2, 2009 12:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rasheed was not on `93 UNC team...
He arrived the following year.
Rasheed nearly single-handedly beat the Lakers in the 2000 playoffs.
Too bad they blew the 15 point lead in the 4th quarter of Game 7.
by Title 18 on Sep 2, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what makes sheed different
from some of these other guys is that sheed’s meltdowns made him a liability to his own team more than a nuisance to opposing teams (although he is that too).
by hooray on Sep 2, 2009 1:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rasheed Wallace
Let me tell you, when the Celtics start winning, and Wallace shows us all how good he really is, all the distaste for his game will go away. It is sometimes hard to picture the “bad” guy in a Celtics uniform, but talent wipes away everything. I believe the Celtics will be a team to be feared this year. Let the writers and announcers keep underrating them, this just brings out the best in some of the best players in the game. Wallace will make us glad he signed here.
by RTroy on Sep 2, 2009 3:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I've always been somewhat of a Rasheed fan
His braggadocio personality has amused more anything. The devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know, IMO. At least with players like Sheed, what you see is what you get.
He will do some on court stupid stuff, no doubt. But the positives outweighed the potential negatives.
My take is that he is a follower more than a leader. But I am okay with that. That will work well here with this group.
by tenaciousT on Sep 2, 2009 4:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rasheed Wallace - question on kind of bad guy?
I admit that while I watched Wallace play the Celtics, saw his talents and think that the things he brings in skills are a great fit for what the Celtics need up front, I’m not totally sure of the kind of bad guy he was on the Pistons and the fairness. I thought of him as creating havoc with tough defense, committing fouls he thought he didn’t deserve and drawing many T’s with his attitude toward the refs. Aside from his T’s and the complaining to ref attitude thing that took on its own legendary life, momentum and notoriety, and added to the reasons to root against them, I found the most recent successful version of the Pistons very different from the Laimbeer, Mahorn and Isaiah Pistons. I respected Billups, Hamilton, Prince, and Wallace (even Webster) for their teamwork, offense and defense, and for success with their style of "Eastern Conference basketball" play that helped fuel the resurgence in the current NBA era that values teamwork and defense more than in the 90’s. Dare I say to some degree they played a more Celtic-like style?
I didn’t see them tainted as thugs or bullies as in the style of the earlier version of the Pistons, so I rooted against them in a different way than against Laimbeer and Company. Does that sense of the “Wallace” vs. the "Laimbeer" Pistons ring mostly true or was I missing something?
by SteveZ from Edgemont on Sep 2, 2009 5:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Makes sense to me
I grudgingly rooted for the post-Laimbeer Pistons. Used to be a big fan of the Dave Bing/Bob Lanier Pistons. Thought I saw a little of ‘Big Bob’ in Sheed’s Detroit arrival. It just didn’t overcome the bad taste left by Laimbeer. Hope to see a little of the old ‘Big Bob’ in Boston. Awesome!
by OldCeltFan on Sep 2, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
always liked sheed as a player from college on and he has always shined. he is a bit of a baby with his temper problems and that always bothered me-come on sheed, get a grip. anger always needs an object and like tommy, sheed’s object is the ref. better the ref than your teammates or taking cheap shots at opponents. i do hope that sheed spends some time down low too because he has a sweet low game.
by nazzbo on Sep 2, 2009 5:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sample of Rasheed’s other side:
Rasheed Wallace the father….
Not a typical NBA fatherhood story. Compare to Malone and Kemp….
‘Sheed had a child, Ishmiel, with his girlfriend Chiquita Bryant before he had any big contracts. When they broke up he tried to continue to visit and support his son.
It became clear that the mother was not doing a good job, I do not remember
if she was on drugs or alcoholic or what, but also would not let him see his boy despite court ordered visitation rights.
So ’Sheed sued for custody. Hard for any father to win no matter what the
finances, but he did just that after many months in court. He was by then in
a stable relationship with his current wife and their new baby son and her older
son from her first marriage.
When he came to Portland the custody court case was still on-going.
We only heard he was arrested for ’assault’ and assumed the usual.
No one got too excited at that time about players off court behavior in Portland but not much was said when the charges were dropped as unfounded. ’Sheed was just blocking a driveway at a daycare with his car. He was just trying to see his kid during the trial, he had not seen him for nearly a year.
’Sheed a few weeks later in May of 97 when a North Carolina judge awarded him full custody of Ishmiel thought it was over.
But the mother then bolted with the boy and disappeared, which was legally a felony noncustodial parent kidnapping at that point, and a warrant was issued for her arrest.
For the rest of the year he searched for his son, hired detectives, flew back east
at every chance to help in the search.
Despite the hell he was going though he did not let it affect his game that I remember.
Except the blurb about blocking the driveway, little of it was public knowledge.
That changed at Xmas time TNT did a story about it during halftime of a game. In the
interview he was clearly distressed not knowing where his son might be or
even if he was safe. Someone who saw the program recognized the mother from the
photos and called the police to tell them where Sheed’s kid was. Sort of TNT
most wanted…
The police arrested the mother on Xmas eve and Sheed’s mom went to bring ’Sheed’s son
home to Philadelphia. Sheed flew in from Portland on Xmas day 1997 to bring his
boy home to Portland. Ishmiel was now 28 months old and ’Sheed had not seen the child since August of 1996.
‘Sheed then made bail for the mother, refused to press charges against the
her and had his lawyer work to have the charges dropped. ’Sheed brought her to Portland, found her employment and bought her a house near his to be close and share in her son’s life.
The tattoo on his arm in Egyptian Motif is the drawing he created of himself and his wife Fatima with their 3 sons.
by Dekko on Sep 2, 2009 6:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
great post...
I never knew that about him.
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 3, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another Sheed character statement
Got home to Boston late Monday after 23 hours of travelling and was renting a Hertz car for another trip next day. 1:30am Hertz counter. Hertz melting down. No cars ready. Black couple waiting when I got there. Guy sitting, head down. I finally got my car and walked out and my wife said “Hey stupid, that was Rasheed Wallace”. Went back in shook his hand, shared a few words.
Point being…he was getting same treatment rest of us were getting from Hertz and not pulling any celebrity rank. First impression a good one in my book.
(Sorry Hertz. Normally you do a good job)
by Wildblu1 on Sep 2, 2009 6:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good story, and accordingly, I pledge to say nothing on the occasion of Wallace’s first technical.
by no kidding on Sep 2, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow, great story too
It is nice to see someone like that deal with the same routine BS you deal with and not complain ;)
by TomHamilton30 on Sep 3, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least your wife recognized him
My wife wouldn’t know Rasheed Wallace from Adam Morrison when comes to the NBA.
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Sep 2, 2009 8:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Funny!
I really enjoyed this article and thread – thanks all
by nba is the worst on Sep 2, 2009 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wives
When my wife comes to game with me she notices everything but the game being played. She notices who is mad on the bench, who is “sweating too much. Is he OK?”. She always looks for Eddie House’s kid, what Tommy’s wearing. She loves Ray, loves KG but is glad she’s not married to him, loves Perk’s facial expressions.
She likes Donny Marshall, hates Tanguay. She is sold on Rasheed since I told her he’s a good family man. That is far more important to her than his shooting range.
by Wildblu1 on Sep 2, 2009 10:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that's funny
my wife loves Paul Pierce’s smile and was totally distracted at the last game we went to because the woman from Grey’s Anatomy was in the front row
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Sep 3, 2009 6:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sheed
I guess, Sheed is far from those Bad Boys since he is not that of a dirty player. Yes, Sheed is a temperamental guy on the floor but not looking for a fight…I agree that the league and that most NBA writers hate us and you could easily sense that. Just like these off-season moves by the 3 Beasts of the East-Cavs, Magic & the C’s. Obviously, the Celtics improved the most sicen their starters are back and healthy plus got better with their new aquisitions. While the Cavs and the Magic somehow are a new team and their new additions doens’t addressed their lost and what their team needs. But these “experts” (a term we used in our group) doesn’t see it that way. No ring for the “king” as long as his team is immature and Shaq would only just add up on their foolish antics and mess thier ofense. The Diesel is not the perfect teacher or complimentary to surround LeBron’s game and Vince is no Hedo to help out Howard and Rashard.
by JamesGreen on Sep 2, 2009 11:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You Got It
Never heard it said better I wish we could watch the first game KG ally-oops over Shaq from a no look pass right by King Jr.!
by rudster on Sep 10, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
self-important?
I’ve always liked Rasheed. I never got the sense he felt self-important. He has always been an unselfish player.
by duaneoch on Sep 3, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Badboy
Hey now we can get the same comments the Pats have been getting since tearing the NFL apart,yera after year,Brady is a bum, Moss a hot head but WE HAVE THE RINGS,enough said I will enjoy watching the C’s entering the Teams you hate because there GREAT!
by rudster on Sep 10, 2009 9:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

























