Camp Questions: How Will Sheed Fit In?
2 Days Till Camp! Leading up to the opening of training camp on Sept. 28 we'll be taking a look at several questions that should be resolved by the end of camp.
Last year the most glaring need on the team was depth in the post. That need became more and more glaring as we lost KG and Powe, forcing Big Baby into a larger role and prompting the Mikki Moore experiment that we're all still trying to forget.
Despite being over the luxury tax line, Danny got the green light to throw the full MLE at Rasheed Wallace. On paper he's a perfect fit. He's a former All Star and NBA champion big man who defends and stretches the floor with his shooting. You couldn't ask for a better offseason addition ...provided he plays close to his former standards.
For the past year or year and a half, he's played somewhat disinterested and unmotivated - in part because management decided that it was time to break up the nucleus of the most consistent contending team in the last decade.
The hope is that this fresh start is just what he needs to get motivated and passionate about the sport again. The hope is that his outbursts at the refs will be the extend of his anger management issues. The hope is that he's still got 2 or 3 years left and that he can add to his Championship belt collection.
It always takes a little time to get to know one's teammates and find their place in the rotation. It will be interesting to see how much he plays at center and how much he backs up Garnett. My feeling is that he will start off the bench, but finish on the court in place of Perkins.
So what's the over/under on number of games before his first technical?
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
He’ll fit in great …until the slightest sign of adversity.
by PistonsNation on Sep 26, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That was my thought too...
… and then I remembered about the ref situation with the lockout and stuff.
No idea what’ll happen. No, idea.
So I’m gonna call it at game 3. Just to be different ;) (thought remains the same though: he’ll get one. Quick.)
- Dirk 'DaarisDirk' van Boxtel
by Kiorrik on Sep 26, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There will always be technicals
Wallace is going to fit in great, but he’s also 35 years old, so there will be a lot of nights where he doesn’t bring it full-board—and that’s okay. We just need good defense, decent shotblocking and rebounding, and timely jumpers—things Wallace can provide in short bursts on most nights. I don’t think Wallace is a 30 minute plus player anymore. With our big man rotation, we won’t need more than that—Baby and Perk can do the heavy lifting.
Of course, we might need to lean more on Wallace in the beginning of the year if KG is still working his way back to top form. Even then I’d caution playing Wallace too many early minutes—we need him peaking in March/April, not in December. As such, I’d lean heavy on Perk and Baby (and sometimes Williams) when practical.
As for when he get his first T? Probably sometime in the preseason—with the replacement refs, it’ll be way too easy not to.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Sep 26, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gotta be contrary here
I think Sheed will enjoy not having the team rely on him as much as has been his history; he’ll be playing like a little kid for awhile – laughing off the calls and having fun. I’ll give him until after Christmas for the first technical. As the Lakers and rematch with the Cavs approach, the intensity will show. Until then, as long as he is not over-used (why would he be?) he’ll be having too much fun to get upset. Big Baby and the Landlord have a lot to prove, Sheed doesn’t.
by OldCeltFan on Sep 26, 2009 3:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"My feeling is that he will start off the bench, but finish on the court in place of Perkins".
Or I could see an offense/defense substitution pattern.
by Little D on Sep 26, 2009 3:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’d put the technical plus/minus in quarters and not in games.
25-30mpg playing both positions…A perfect addition
by Finkelskyhook on Sep 26, 2009 4:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Question for our Stat guys
How is his free throw percentage? Is he someone you really want fouled during ‘end of game’ times-AKA Ray Allen? Or is he a “OMG don’t let him have the ball now-AKA Shaq” type?
by Dipper on Sep 26, 2009 4:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sheed is a ft% of .77. Whereas Perk is sitting at about .60, and Garnett is .84. So if it’s a tight game, he’s in instead of Perk, and I’d be fairly comfortable with him having the ball. The goal should always be Ray, but if he’s in triple coverage, Sheed can be trusted.
Does anyone know Pierce’s percentage on endgame free throws? It seems to me that he misses a lot of them, the most glaring I can remember was the Lakers game last year when he missed two at the end of regulation, and then two in overtime, if I remember correctly.
by KY Celts fan on Sep 26, 2009 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wallace finishing games
I agree that this is the most likely scenario, particularly against teams who aren’t dependent on their centers, but I’m a little concerned about what this means for Perkins long-term. Perk’s come a long way in his career, and especially the last two years: Doc didn’t trust him down the stretch during the championship season, playing Posey in his place; last season, however, out of necessity, Perkins played and was arguably our best player in the playoffs. Now that Perk’s proven himself to an extent, how will he react to going back to the bench in crunch time?
http://rhymeswithhondo.blogspot.com
by Rhymes With Hondo on Sep 26, 2009 5:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Reason
This happened when Doc need to spread the floor and went with Posey over Perk. This may happen at times, but Perk is our Center. Wallace won’t play Center for Perk at end of games, unless he goes beyond the three point line. I also see them playing together at times.
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Sep 26, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Camp opens
Tuesday, not Monday
by Black Jack Pershing on Sep 26, 2009 6:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
incredible
doesn’t need to fit in.. as long as he has that look on his face every time he steps onto the court.
by JunkyardDawg on Sep 26, 2009 8:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He is already integrated
Sheed makes us the candidate number 1 to the ring
by greenwise on Sep 26, 2009 9:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1) Sheed will fit in well
2) Who is playing at the end of the game will depend on the situation and who we are playing.
3) Sheed has always been the best player on his team. When he came to Detroit he was glad to to have a team concept.
by tyquinton on Sep 27, 2009 1:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How will he not fit in? hes the perfect fit as far as im concerned, personality and his game
by latin on Sep 27, 2009 9:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and how will these replacement refs effect rasheed? because to me, hes always been the refs punching bag, he gets Td up rather quick, while a guy like KG could be t’d up multiple times a game, every game..and the refs let it go, when they clearly wouldnt for sheed.
Can anyone picture sheed on the sidelines acting like KG did last postseason without the league stepping in? how about if Sheed was the one who taunted calderon instead of kevin? theres been a double standard there if you ask me
by latin on Sep 27, 2009 9:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rasheed will be the Bill Walton of 2010
Just as a aging all star veteran Bill Walton came to the Celtics in 86 and became the best 6th man in the NBA that year , Rasheed has the chance to be the same for the Celtics this year.
Now when we go up against Cleveland, Orlando and LA we will have a strong & tall back up center coming off the bench to match up against them instead of having to rely on the the shorter, smaller Powe and Baby that we used last year who were always overpowered.
The Celtics now will not miss a beat during front court power forward and center substitutions rotations when we go against those teams which means match up trouble for them when they face us.
by fordescort on Sep 27, 2009 9:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ON paper he fits in REAL well
But unless a REAL nba game starts im not betting on anything
A side note (Rasheed + Celtics + new Reffs = how much T’s)
by Zzbeat on Sep 27, 2009 10:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs























