Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NHL Trade Rumors: Do You Make A Move For Rick Nash?

Who Starts Out Inactive?

Now entering the game, #42, Expiring Contract

This is one of those silly questions that can't be answered because...

  1. We don't have 15 players on the roster yet (or an indication that there will be only 14)
  2. There could still be a trade or two before the season
  3. We haven't seen anyone earn a spot in training camp

However, in that proverbial world where the season starts tomorrow and you are the GM and coach of the Celtics, who would you start off on the inactive list?

Obviously the starters and top of the rotation guys (like Sheed, Daniels, Baby, and House) are not in consideration unless you know something I don't.

That leaves this fun bunch:

You can only have 12 players on the active roster.  You can activate and deactivate as much as you want, but unless there's an injury, players are normally either on or off the active roster until they can play their way on.  

So which 3 would you leave off the active roster?

Comment 80 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

hmmmm...

1.) Tony Allen
2.) Tony Allen
3.) Tony Allen

But seriously, definitely Tony Allen. As far as the others go, either Walker or Giddens (maybe even both?) will be on that list. Perhaps Hudson too. My guess would be Shelden Williams and Scalabrine won’t be—the more relief for Garnett/’Sheed, the better.

But that backup PG situation might mandate Hudson being active, if he’s signed. (Unless Ainge is really serious about this Marquis Daniels as PG thing.) In which case I’d vote Scalabrine as the odd man out.

by bodyofwater on Sep 8, 2009 11:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Nothing besides multiple injuries mandates Hudson being active. We are no more shallow at point than we were when Pruitt was in the d-league. And why would we expect Hudson to play better at point than Daniels?

TA doesn’t wave towels as well when in a suit.

by guava_wrench on Sep 9, 2009 2:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

SORRY

That’s not going to happen, unless he’s injured which could happen. I think at times the 12 will be determined by who is healthy. Also, Scal and Williams seem to me to be insurance policies so it’s possible one of them can and will be inactive at times.

As for TA there are 3 reasons he won’t be inactive: 1st: If Danny and Celtic’s Nation (not necessarily me) really want TA traded he has to play!!!!! I don’t have a problem trading TA for value. 2nd: If Daniels plays backup PG someone needs to play minutes at SF for PP and maybe some SG for Ray which would be more likely TA than Walker and Giddens. And 3rd: Walker and Giddens and if we sign Hudson can be sent to the D League to gain experience and improve, there’s no sense leaving them on the bench to rot. And we all know that Doc likes Vets rather than rookies or younger players.

by badax33 on Sep 9, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

almost

I disagree that TA has to play to increase his trade value. His value is as an expiring contract just like Scal. He doesn’t need to play to change to get that across to other teams.

TA will be on the active roster simply because Doc likes experience/vets and TA has a few years on Walker and Giddens.

Hopefully at the trade deadline, Danny moves TA and Scal for someone better off the bench. Even with that occurring, it’s no lock that Walker or Giddens gets moved to the active roster. Danny may very well pull a waived vet in to be the 12th man.

by slamtheking on Sep 9, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well

If we really want Scalabrine and Allen possibly traded, you gotta go with those 2. Scalabrine’s a no brainer to be on the active roster, as far as I’m concerned. He’s shown his worth, overpaid or what not be damned.

TA, if healthy, can be effective. He’s clearly went the way of Gerald Green in terms of his welcome here, but he’s still on the team, and if you really want him traded, he needs to at least play to increase his trading value.

That leaves Williams, Walker, Giddens, and Hudson (if he’s signed) for the final spot.

Assuming Scal’s on the active roster, we have five bigs in KG, Perkins, Wallace, BBD, and Scal. Scal and Williams could very be interchanged between active and inactive throughout the season, but I think based on who we have on our depth chart for bigs, Williams will be receiving much more DNPs in the box score.

Giddens….well, we have Ray Allen, House, and possibly Daniels here and there for the SG depth chart. I don’t think there’s room for Giddens unless he kills in training camp.

That leaves Walker and Hudson.

Walker has gotten NBA time, and seemed like just off last year as the most likely candidate to get that 12th and final spot just off that. He seems further along, but just needs the game to slow down for him. If he can prove himself in training camp, he probably gets the nod.

So:

Starters: Rondo, Ray Allen, PP, KG, Perkins

Bench: Wallace, Daniels, BBD, House,

Insurance: Scal, TA, Bill Walker

Inactive: Giddens, Hudson, Williams.

by Tai on Sep 8, 2009 11:36 PM EDT reply actions  

good points, except...

Tony Allen has zero trade value as it is, unless he’s thrown into a deal because he’s an expiring contract. (In which case his performance doesn’t matter.) I can’t see a single scenario on this year’s team where he could possibly do anything to increase his value, unless there’s a new stat measuring the amount of times per 48 minutes that a player dribbles the ball out of control down the court and bounces it off his foot.

He’s a total lame duck. I would much rather see Giddens, Hudson, and Williams get some burn.

by bodyofwater on Sep 8, 2009 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's is a Stat

Look under TA in the boxscore right next to TO..

by liamail on Sep 9, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I really don’t see how you can accurately guess this before camp. I’d say right now it’s the 3 young guys (if it’s Hudson with that last spot as we’re assuming), just to be conservative. I think there’s a good chance either Walker or Giddens will bump Williams down, 6 big guys in 12 spots. The only way I don’t see this happening is if they are absolutely terrible.
There’s a chance both of them could move up, but for that to happen Tony Allen would have to look pretty bad. Though, that’s really not that unlikely.
The chances of Hudson backing up Rondo are pretty low in my opinion. That could of course change depending on how good he looks with the team.

by markgent on Sep 8, 2009 11:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Young guys?

By young guys you mean Walker, Rondo and Baby? Those are the 3 youngest guys on the team.

Even Perk is younger than Hudson.

by guava_wrench on Sep 9, 2009 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

I knew someone was gonna point that out.
I meant the 3 newest guys to the league. Walker, Giddens, and Hudson.

by markgent on Sep 9, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

TA for sure ...

and I’ll also leave Scal and Giddens … Walker played in 29 games last season, probably should’ve gotten into more, certainly deserves to be in more this season. We don’t need 6 active bigs, and I’d like to see what Williams can do for Boston. I’d also like to give Hudson a chance — hey, if he averaged 27 a game in college, he can’t be any worse than the vets being discussed (e.g., Ty Lue).

by rocknrollforyoursoul on Sep 8, 2009 11:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Just wondering

What leads you to the opinion that Walker deserves to be in more this season? He didn’t look all that good last year and looked not so great, given his competition, in the summer league. I do believe in Walker and think he could be a player but as of yet, he hasn’t shown me that he’s deserved anything more than time in the D-League. And I like the guy.

by nickagneta on Sep 9, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have to say ...

if Lester Hudson makes the team all three young guys that are eligible to play in the D-League, will be. That means Giddens, Walker and Hudson are inactive playing up the street in Portland and if anyone gets hurt they are activated for the next game being on this side of the planet this year instead of Utah.

Some questions I have are:

Will Hudson be a non-contract invitee to camp and is his injured finger even well enough to play with yet?

Will there be any non contract invitees to camp at all?

Will the team send Hudson overseas if someone better proves themselves in camp or becomes available before the season starts?

by nickagneta on Sep 8, 2009 11:44 PM EDT reply actions  

How can the team send Hudson anywhere? Please explain the mechanics of how that would happen.

by guava_wrench on Sep 9, 2009 2:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Teams don’t tell players to tell their agent to find themselves a gig in Europe because they don’t have what it takes just yet to make the NBA? I thought stashing players overseas was a fairly common thing.

by nickagneta on Sep 9, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

When has that ever happened?

When has a player ever been sent to Europe? The players who stay overseas are players who are already overseas and under contract. They just continue to play there and NBA teams retain rights.

With players from here, they can wait us out and if we do not tender an offer, we will lose their rights. It seems the teams really don’t have much leverage to force a player overseas. (besides that fact that stashing a 25 year old abroad seems a bad idea).

I have posted about this quite a few times in the forums, but no discussion ever resulted.

by guava_wrench on Sep 10, 2009 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Often

Teams (San Antonio and Portland frequently do this) often draft players, especially European players and leave them overseas. I can give you an entire list: Ginobli, Rudy Fernandex, Sergio Rodrigues, Fabricio Oberto, Luis Scola, Petrei Konnen Joel Freeland, Semih Erden (Celtics) and there are many more. Nick Calathes is playing in Europe rather than with Dallas. Boston drafted Darius Songalia and supposedly worked behind the scenes to get him overseas and keep his rights.

No player can, in general, be forced to go overseas. However, 2nd rd picks often find it more profitable to go overseas than take a non guarenteed contract that is for less money than the NBA. Also, contracts in Europe have an Income Tax exemption, it used to be 150K, but I think it’s more today. Also, European contracts usually include room, board, and cars. I think, Europe start their training camps earlier than or about the same time NBA so if you wait for an NBA call a player might miss out on Europe.

1st rd picks have a slotted salary so if they are making 2M in Europe why would they come to the US to play for 1M. Like American players there is a year when they are eligible for the draft and can’t withdraw. Then there are the ricky rubio’s with a large buyout and their NBA team can only donate 500K to set them free.

Those are just some things that I know and I’m sure there are other people who know more than me. But many NBA teams do try to keep players overseas because these teams do a better job of teaching fundamentals. this gives them a player they are not paying but who is improving in a very competitive environment.

by badax33 on Sep 10, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

I think it has to be Hudson definitely. I think Giddens will also be an inactive, because of the lack of experience as well. The third inactive could go many ways. I could literally see it being anyone on that list. I think it will ultimately come down to who practices harder then the rest and also who the celts are playing.

I dont think they signed Williams to shove him on the inactive list all season but I’m not sure if he will get minutes early on over Scal… even though I wouldn’t be against it

If it was my team I’d sit Hudson, TA, and Giddens.

I can’t see TA every contributing over House or Daniels or even Walker.

Hudson I’m not ready to throw into the league just yet. Let the boys knock him around in practice for a bit then we’ll see.

Same with Giddens… haven’t seen enough.

If Hudson or Giddens show they are NBA ready, I’d sit out Scal if the bigs are all healthy.

So i guess Hudson, TA, Giddens… but it is a very interesting topic.

by Jimmy Toscano on Sep 8, 2009 11:46 PM EDT reply actions  

It's a toughy!

I’d keep,
-Scal,
-Sheldon,
- Hudson,

But then again I really think Giddens and Walker deserve a go, so if Quisy does a good job backing up the point to begin the season, I’d like to see hudson sent to D-league with Billy or JR coming in.

by Jackson34 on Sep 9, 2009 12:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Cut Hudson loose, and place Scalabrine and Tony Allen on the inactive roster.

Giddens and Walker would compete to backup Pierce. Best man wins. Meanwhile, Williams would get a look see as a 4 backup.

Eventually, the loser of the Giddens/Walker competition would be replaced by an activated Scalabrine.

by no kidding on Sep 9, 2009 12:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Hudson a bit old to hide in d-league for a year

Might make sense to cut Hudson if he isn’t ready. They guy is not young. If he can’t show something this year, I don’t see us holding on to him when he is already 25.

by guava_wrench on Sep 9, 2009 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you sign Hudson and put him in the D-League. TA makes the active roster, as does Scal. Put Williams and Giddens on inactive. If TA doesn’t get his “stuff” together, Giddens takes that spot. If TA does get it together and is actually putting in quality minutes, let him play out his contract and say “good luck with someone else next year” if there still isn’t anyone who’ll give something up for him. Williams comes on when one of our bigs gets banged up (it will happen).

After that, you’ve got to examine trade options to bring in a backup PG. Because I just don’t trust a combination of Daniels/House or a PG by committee type of thing. But thats a whole different topic.

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Sep 9, 2009 12:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Training camp winners

Winner of the following battles get two of the spots:
- Scal vs. Shelden
- TA vs. Billy vs. Giddens

Personally I think we need to have Hudson active from jump street to see whether or not he can contribute any valuable minutes at backup PG, which is currently our shakiest position.

I would expect Shelden to win the big man battle but the wing battle I have no idea. I’m pulling for Bill Walker.

by born.an.mc on Sep 9, 2009 1:37 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm not going to like it but this is what it will be...

Tony is on the roster in order to showcase himself for a trade. If we left him inactive (like we should) he might not a have a few good games which might cause a stupid gm to overpay for him.
Scal: he’s a good role/hustle player.
Bill Walker: Bench help is needed more at the three than the four and five. BBD, Sheed, KG and Perk all good enough to play 30+ minutes a night. There won’t be enough time around to play Shelden.

by Evantime34 on Sep 9, 2009 1:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Those were three to keep

Not three to leave off the active roster.

by Evantime34 on Sep 9, 2009 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Definitely not TA

1. The only obvious one is Hudson if he is even signed. He will have to show a lot to get a sniff of the court.

2. Giddens or Walker (or both)

3. Whoever is aching or Scal. Possibly TA, possibly Williams. Depends upon matchups.

TA should get minutes early on if he is healthy.

by guava_wrench on Sep 9, 2009 2:00 AM EDT reply actions  

I meant definitely not TA as the first. He could if we are playing a big team, and Giddens or Walker look great in camp.

by guava_wrench on Sep 9, 2009 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whats with all the Scalabrine love??

He was signed 4 years ago when we were a rebuilding team and nobody else wanted to sign here. We are not that team anymore, he’s awful, always out of shape, so please get over it. His career has been more of a Gag Joke than anything. As for the topic:

T. Allen
Walker
Williams

^^^Should be activated. Allen NEEDS to be active because:

1. We need him to appear more enticing as trade bait. Burying him on the bench will only make him an expiring. We need as many options as possible.

2. He’s in a contract year, he will want as much money as he can get. Hopefully upping his trade value.

Walker def seems to have more potential than Giddens, & Williams was signed for a reason. He rebounds better than Scalabrine, is in better shape than Scals, & as bad as his Offense might be, i guarantee its more efficient than Scals 3-pt only shooting.

Hudson should go to the D-League until the All-Star Break. This will give T. Allen time before the trade deadline to up his value. With Quisy being able to play backup PG, there is no rush for Hudson to see much time early on in the season. As for Scalabrine, every GM knows what they are getting with him. He should be inactive considering he’s an expiring contract, or filler at best in a trade. There is no potential in a man who consistantly shows up every year in worse shape.

by truthhurts34 on Sep 9, 2009 3:33 AM EDT reply actions  

In worse shape?

Does Scal just look like that on the court or you know for sure he doesn’t work out? Your reasonings are ok, but I feel you just want to slam Scal unneedlessly. You say GMs know what they’ll get with Scal, when the same exact argument could be said for Tony Allen.

As far as I’m concerned, both TA and Scal are on the same boat, and if you really think one of them doesn’t even deserve to play if only to increase his trade value, what makes you think the other’s different? At absolute worst, that disaster TA put up at the end of Game 6 against the Bulls made him look worse than he really is. Is that why you’re willing to play TA? To make some GMs forget about that enough to take a chance on TA in a trade? Cause outside of that, I’d much rather see both hit the inactive list than watch one of them play and of them sit. It’s that simple.

by Tai on Sep 9, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d like to see Walker stay with the team in an ideal world, plus he’s been here working out all summer long pretty much so I’d love to see all his hard work rewarded. I’m really hoping he can make “the leap” this year, and take a solid backup role on the bench.

That said: Hudson, TA, and Giddens should start the year inactive in my ideal world. I have a suspicion that it’ll probably be the 3 young guys inactive though, Hudson, Walker, and Giddens.

by celticspride003 on Sep 9, 2009 6:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Williams over Scal

   I’d rather see Williams active. With Scal you know what you are going to get and he’s not going to improve in any areas. And, worst case, is another concussion. Williams is a better rebounder, probably a better defender and almost anyone is a better offensive player then Scal. And Williams SHOULD have some upside.

by Dipper on Sep 9, 2009 6:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Scal was shooting...

…well in the playoffs. As sad as it is, Scal may be the better offensive player. Willams won’t spread the floor but will be more effective inside, (I would be more effective inside).

by Little D on Sep 9, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Given that Scal has spent time on the DL before when healthy, I’d say he’s there. Then one of either Walker or Giddens, not both. And of course, if Hudson is signed, he’ll be there as well. I might add I was stunned to read G.W. saying that ‘25 is not young’. Wow, I thought I was watching women’s gymnastics. I don’t see Tony being on the DL since Doc actually puts him in the rotation when healthy.

1. Scal
2. Walker or Giddens (not both)
3. Hudson, if he’s signed.

by amenhotep04 on Sep 9, 2009 7:12 AM EDT reply actions  

adding a new twist

if you haven’t already, how would you rank the listed group of players 1 to 6?

I might go with this

1 Scal – I think he’s a valuable backup
2 Bill Walker – someone has to back up Pierce
3 Giddens – I’d rather “take a look” at him than “showcase” Tony
4 Tony – has experience so he’s a valuable piece
5 Williams – good big man insurance
6 Hudson – hello Maine Red Claws!

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Sep 9, 2009 7:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Tony

sorry, I meant to say “has experience, so he’s a valuable insurance piece in case of injury”

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Sep 9, 2009 7:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

1. Scal – has proven himself the most
2. Tony – he’ll stay here until someone else proves better
3. Walker – my guess is he will prove worthy enough to backup Pierce on occasions
4 WIlliams – bumped onto inactive by Walker, but will likely move back and forth
5. Giddens – too many people at SG
6. Hudson – i doubt he will actually get PG minutes

by markgent on Sep 9, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still feel TA can bring something this season, a solid backup 2

He has less pressure on him this season, last year he was considered the new posey and become the 6th man on the team.

by CelticPride18 on Sep 9, 2009 8:01 AM EDT reply actions  

And TA

he could be hungry guys.

Contract year,

future uncertain,

still an orgy of athletisim and tenacity…

those things could boil over for TA this year and push him closer to where we all hoped he would be one day. Likely? No, but he always plays hard.

by Nut from NH on Sep 9, 2009 8:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Unfortunately he doesn't always play smart

Could Scal and TA be more opposite?

TA is raw athletism with (sometimes) seemingly no basketball sense.

Scal is the big, slow white guy who looks like he should be watching the game on the couch while pounding a few Boston Lager’s but actually plays very smart basketball, rarely making fundamental mistakes (although equally rarely making great athletic plays).

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Allen, Giddens, Hudson

It won’t be Williams, I don’t think we signed him just to have him on the inactive roster. Scal is a good back up for the bigs. I think Walker has potential, he could be a good 3rd string sg or sf.

by jfarias on Sep 9, 2009 8:03 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

way too early

I still think that Danny will pick up another vet PG….Lester will be in the D league…and the TA haters will just have to wait until after camp…I still think TA will be active…I gota think Walker and JR will enjoy Portland for awhile…

by Fastbreak1 on Sep 9, 2009 8:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Scal, Allen & Giddens

The starting 5 are all set:
Rajon, Allen, Perk, Garnet & Pierce.

The back ups are all set:
House, Hudson, Rasheed, Baby & Daniels.

The last 2 active spots must go to:
 Walker and Williams.

Therefore all the rest of the players must be placed on the inactive roster .

by fordescort on Sep 9, 2009 8:06 AM EDT reply actions  

FAIR WEATHER FANS

A lot of you guys trashing Tony were ga ga about him during his streaks preceding injuries that he played really well. Tony can play – he just needs a basketball IQ implant.

I would like to see what Tony can do this year now that he a couple of years removed from that devasting knee injury.

That said, Doc needs to develop players not run his work horses into the ground. So the last spots on the active roster have to go to the players that have the most potential to make a future impact with the team.

These would include Walker, Giddens, Hudson and Williams. We are likely trading Scal and Tony Allen before the trade deadline and the NBA community already know what they can do. I would like to see some Tony early to see if he has his sizzle back. If not, see if this other group can contribute. Danny needs to know what he has with this group.

by ForexPirate on Sep 9, 2009 8:15 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with you in TA’s talent. But come on, the guy will be 27 this year. If the Basketball IQ hasn’t developed yet it never will. A prime example of this is his injury two years ago dunking on a dead play that ended his season. WTF??? In addition, Doc has not trusted him enough. Even with his faults he is still head and shoulders our best perimiter defender. Doc barely played him the enitre Bulls series.

by bigjohnson34st on Sep 9, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

what?

“..still head and shoulder’s our best perimiter(sic) defender.” ??!!!

What are you basing that on? His ability to constantly get beat because he cheats into the passing lane trying to get showboat steals? He often looks like he has no idea that he’s supposed to be playing a TEAM defensive scheme.

I would rank several of the C’s way ahead of TA at perimeter defense. His athleticism saves him from a lot of mistakes, so he’s not the worst. But no way is he ‘head and shoulder’s’ our best.

I do agree with you that, at age 27, he’s way overdue for the development of any real court sense.

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

same topic

I posted the same topic in the forums several days ago.

My take on it:
Doc doesn’t play youth. Walker, Giddens and Hudson are in d-league to start the year.
1) Williams wasn’t signed to be a DNP-CD.
2) When substituting, Doc will keep either Ray or PP on the floor with House and Daniels. That’s 3 guys that can bring the ball up without having to sign another PG or using Rondo all game. If Doc wants both Ray and PP resting, in comes Rondo. House slides to SG and Daniels plays SF. TA is kept active as insurance.

If the C’s sign a vet PG instead of Hudson, Williams takes Hudson’s place on the inactive roster. Scal can “play” 3/4 so his versatility keeps him active over Williams in this particular scenario.
On this topic though, I’d rather see them keep Hudson if he shows something in camp. With Eddie’s contract up after this year, if Hudson can show he can be instant offense like Eddie, he could slide right into Eddie’s spot next year for less $.

by slamtheking on Sep 9, 2009 8:16 AM EDT reply actions  

not the first or last time I’ve stolen an idea from the forums :)

(I don’t remember the thread specifically, but I’m sure the topic got stuck in my head from it)

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Sep 9, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

flattered

Jeff,
I’m actually flattered I posted a forum topic you thought was worth putting on the main page [whether or not you “borrowed” the idea doesn’t matter—-I’ll delude myself into thinking you liked what you saw ;-) ]

by slamtheking on Sep 9, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

too early for this topic

we still need to see if Hudson is signed and what happens in training camp. there are always injuries that come into play and let’;s not forget that KG’s health is an unknown at the moment. Obviously the C’s have been trying to move TA and will continue to do so. Giddens or walker can easily fill his spot not to mention Marquis. Scal is a rotation player and so is WIlliams albeit both are at the end of the bench. I would love to see another shooter or a long defender a la tayshaun. I wouldn’t mind a pg but I think danny is comfortable signing hudson and seeing if he can be the deep reserve at pg. so, from where I sit I hope that they trade Tony Allen and Scal and parlay them into another decent bench player who can do something really well- either shoot, rebound, block shots or whatever. Someone with a discernable skill who can help the team. If I had to vote now I’d say Hudson, Walker and GIddens start the season on the inactive list. I really think though that Danny wants to get Giddens some pt which is another reason why tony has to go

by Red2 on Sep 9, 2009 8:56 AM EDT reply actions  

well of course it is too early for this topic

and we’ll address it again in camp – several times I’m sure

but it is fun to speculate and debate and form and define early biases

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Sep 9, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not hard unless something happens

Walker, Giddens and Hudson have to DOMINATE their counterparts to crack the active lineup. I am not saying it is not possible or that they won’t, just saying what they have to do to crack that lineup.

It’s really like boxing, when there is a draw, the champ keeps the belt.

by afflatus on Sep 9, 2009 8:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

agree completely. unless they blow Doc away in camp, they’ll be in Maine or street clothes

by slamtheking on Sep 9, 2009 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who Knows?

The guys who play well in camp will be active. Those that don’t, won’t. These threads become popularity contests here, but he coaching staff has to be objective. Yes, trades are possible, but Ainge has been shopping around the league already, and if he hasn’t made a trade by now, I doubt if we will see one.

As for Hudson, he needs to go to Europe unless he can miraculously learn how to play the point.

by Brickowski on Sep 9, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Inactivate Scal, TA and rotatate between JR & Bill. Whoever works thehardest. I saw a lot of potential in Lester during the short time in summer league before his injury. Pure athleticism. Something this team was supposed to get from TA but it never materialized. In TA’s defense though, I think Doc got a little caught up in Win-loss records last year at the expense of developing the young talent and overworking the vets. I hope he corrects that this year. Bill & JR both should be farther ahead in terms of development. I pray he doesnt make the same mistake with Lester.

by bigjohnson34st on Sep 9, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

IF I knew they each got a fair shake in trainng camp

I would agree mostly with Brick…..but i don’t know that because Hudson for example will still be nursing a hurt finger. If Shelden Williams is in consideration for a potential inactive player (I don’t know much about him) then what in the heck did we even bother with him for? Instead of guessing who SHOULD BE, I wiil guess who will be on the inactive list.

Tony Allen, Giddens and Hudson.

One more thing directed at Brick – how do you know Hudson can’t play the point in the NBA – how many times have new players who were thought to be borderline worthy of being in the NBA came into their own and shined when they got the chance on the big stage? More than enough to say “proofs in the pudding”

Peace

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Sep 9, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions  

I Watched Summer League

Hudson doesn’t create for others, not even penetrate and dish, which should be his forte.

Maybe he’s a quick learner, but it usually takes a long time to learn the point. It took Chauncey Billups 5 years. If it takes Hudson 5 years, he’ll be 30 by then.

Hudson could get by on a team that presses all the time and plays helter skelter. He has the potential to be disruptive defensively. But he’s a poor fit for Rivers’ style of play.

by Brickowski on Sep 9, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

summer league?

They aren’t a real team. They weren’t playing practiced plays. It is really really tough for a point guard to come in and be an assist machine in this kind of situtation. I also think he was trying to get his offense going, which, obviously is no excuse. From what I’ve read, he is a player that really REALLY heats up. I’m sure he was trying to heat up for the Celtics, but broke his finger before it happened.

I totally disagree that his style doesn’t fit the Celtics:

1. Tenacious disruptive defender. I like him and want him on the Celtics. This is what I took from seeing him play 1.5 games in summer league. He plays defense like a tornado. It reminded me of Rondo, except Hudson was scarier.

2. He can be an explosive scorer, off the bench. Some people have the touch, some people just don’t. He was the second highest scorer in College basketball, he has the offensive touch. I don’t care about his lower competition, I’ve played enough basketball to know that if you score 30 points almost every time you walk on a court, you have to have an offensive touch.

3. When he is playing around veteran players and superstars, he will look for his pass. He’s going to be dishing to Rasheed Wallace, not Robert Swift. I can understand him looking for his shot in summer league.

This sounds like exactly the kind of player Doc likes. Why do you think they drafted him?

by stevenfuzz on Sep 9, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hudson is very intriguing

although he has the speed and athleticism of a point, he hasn’t yet been in many situations where he has been required to be a playmaker (pass-first). Instead he’s always been the scorer, but without anyone else being his playmaker. But he’s obviously got the raw ability to do just about anything on the court.

I see a guy who just loves to play basketball and has, as you say, ‘the touch’. I expect that if he loves the game as much as he seems to, he will make his game work however Doc wants him to work it. I think Doc is probably the perfect first NBA coach for a player like Hudson.

What did folks call him? The human pinball machine or something like that?

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lol

Wait a second, buddy, couldn’t the same thing be said about Blake Griffin being picked at #1? Cause no one better was at #1?

by Tai on Sep 9, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t forget shining out of position (Hudson was not a PG). That would be a better question. And don’t forget we are talking about the 3rd to last pick of the draft.

by guava_wrench on Sep 10, 2009 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

From what I’ve read about his college career, he played both PG and SG.

Also, he was expected to go much higher in the draft. His age and academic problems far out-shined his athletic ability.

Marquis wasn’t even drafted, and look at where he is. What’s the point of disregarding someone, a childhood bball phenom, before we see him get 1 real minute of playing time.

by stevenfuzz on Sep 10, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Giddens and Scal, not sure about the 3rd guy

I don’t see Williams on the inactive list for a few reasons. He’s replacing Powe’s role.
Also, he’s the only other big on the team that bangs in the paint other than Perk. If you notice all our other bigs stretch the floor and get their points away from the basket. Obviously Garnett and Wallace have a post game, but BBD gets most of his points taking 16ft jumpers and does not rebound well for his size. My point is Scal is another big who doesn’t rebound well and hangs out at the 3 point line. We have Wallace to do that to stretch the D when necessary. Unfortunately, he’s a concussion away from being inactive anyway. Giddens has not shown much of anything in summer camp. I think the 3rd inactive will depend on who is going to back up Rondo. My guess is Hudson goes to the D League and Walker and TA compete for the last spot.

by StealthB on Sep 9, 2009 10:14 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m not saying that Giddens will make the team, but, didn’t he actually play really well in Summer League?

I mean, he was scoring and making some great drives. Good defense. He looked better than Walker (hurt).

Who cares, they are going to rotate it around based on injuries and stuff anyway. The inactive players in the first week might completely change by week 3.

I think Walker will get some time this year, Doc usually starts to play his second year players (remember powe and BBD). TA and Scal are pretty useless, and the Celtics know it. Quis has a similar skill set to TA, but he is far better and smarter and trust-able. I have to say, about Giddens: unlike TA, when he touches the ball I don’t immediately start to pray for a miracle. At worst Giddens just rims out an easy shot. TA would turn it over, hustle back, and foul his man taking the 3.

by stevenfuzz on Sep 9, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

Gawd that is so true, funny and sad.

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

not Allen

I really don’t understand the disdain for TA- he serves a role on the team better than others do. Needless to say I can think of more deserving people who should begin the year on the Inactive list

by justice on Sep 9, 2009 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Williams

Is it a foregone conclusion that Williams cannot beat out Davis?

by Bozo on Sep 9, 2009 1:35 PM EDT reply actions  

whats with all the TA hate? weather you like him or not, TA is our best defender, and if it wasnt for Doc making bad subs all the time, tony would actually have a better rep.

the 3 inactive players thou should be Hudson, sheldon and probably giddens, even thou giddens has a good offensive game and would like to see him get more PT this year but until we get rid of scal, we might as well as leave giddens in the d-league, but i expect giddens and sheldon to be making trips back and forth

with that being said

1 Rondo (house)
2 Allen (daniels, TA)
3 Pierce (walker)
4 KG (BBD, Scal)
5 Perk (wallace)

by wyldkard on Sep 9, 2009 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Allen is the best defender?

Not better than KG and Rondo, are you kidding me?

by stevenfuzz on Sep 9, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

TA is our best defender?????

Pierce, KG, Perkins, Rondo, Wallace & Perkins are all WAAY better defenders than TA. Daniels, Ray Allen, Scal & Walker are all probably better overall defenders too.

If you mean more specifically man-up perimeter defense, exclusing the post defenders then that still leaves Pierce, Rondo for certain and probably Daniels and Walker as folks I’d rather have on the floor on defense than Tony Allen.

The problem with Tony is that while he has great athleticism (when healthy) and can physically keep up with anyone racing down the floor, and has nice long arms and fast hands …. he makes dumb mistakes and seems completely at odds with Tom Thibodeaus’ TEAM defense concept.

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hudson

it would not shock me too much if Hudson makes the 12, rookie or not. Daniels is more likely to play vet back up to Pierce & Ray, which means Walker and Giddens are still too green. I think the back up point is more open to Hudson stepping up, then the 2&3 are for Walker and or Giddens. Doc has played rookies when they have shown they can play. Scal sits, Walker & Giddens back to D league.

by Bozo on Sep 9, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions  

If you want to trade..

…Tony Allen, you need to give him minutes. Other clubs have to see him being productive so they can look past his off court issues.

by Little D on Sep 9, 2009 5:07 PM EDT reply actions  

that's not true

TA’s primary value is as an expiring contract. lack of playing time doesn’t change that. If anyone was looking to add him as talent, Danny probably could have used them as the 3rd team in a S&T with Indy or better yet, that team would have signed him when he was a free agent before last year.

by slamtheking on Sep 9, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

FORDESCORT & MYSELF HAVE THE SAME MAGIC 12 . . .

My 1st Five:
6’7 PIERCE-6’11 GARNETT-6’10 PERKINS-6’5 R. ALLEN-6’1 RONDO

My 2nd Five:
6’9 BBD-6’9 WILLIAMS-6’11 WALLACE-6’1 HOUSE-6’6 DANIELS

My 2 Remaining Active Spots Belong To:
6’6 WALKER & 6’2 HUDSON

by BOOMBOOM on Sep 9, 2009 9:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Observations / Questions
Bigstock_shamrock_-__1306880-1_small
PAMPLONA? ILLINOIS
Small
Gasol, Deron, or Have Faith In Rondo?
Small
This Team is Complete Garbage
Small
Frustrations..
Small
Rondo and back to backs
Small
Steve Kerr on Rondo's jump shot: "It gets frustrating for the Celtics"
Small
Debunking The "Build around Rondo" Myth
Small
What's up with Phoenix? Is a trade brewing?
Small
Look to Denver

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi