Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How Will Spurs Respond to James Anderson's Trade Request?

No Need to Panic

Consider this the "We just suffered our first tough loss of the season, but let's not overreact" post. Was last night disappointing? Definitely. Frustrating? Absolutely. Realistically, should the Celtics have won last night's game and stand at 2-0? You bet. But they didn't, and so they stand at 1-1. We all know it's a looooong season. Even longer than the second Anthony Parker was granted to get that three-pointer off last night. So let's not freak out completely just yet.

I don't think last night's loss, in any way, means this team is diverting down the path it took last season. We can't say that after just one loss. It had the makings of a perfect trap game. The C's were coming off an emotional win in perhaps the most hyped-up opening game of any NBA season ever. The Cavaliers, and every fan in the arena, were poised to rally around the idea of "no more LeBron" (seriously, did the Cavaliers play like a team wallowing in self-pity because LeBron wasn't around?). And it was the second night of a back-to-back against a team with guys who'll scrap for every point they score. It was a bad loss, but bad losses have always happened (not just during last season). Remember when the Celtics lost back-to-back games to the Washington Wizards during the championship season? Or when they fell to the Indiana Pacers in the third game of the season during the 2008-2009 campaign? Should I point out that the Celtics started 27-2 that season? 

Star-divide

Was effort a factor last night? It's certainly possible, and maybe even probable. I wouldn't rule out fatigue entirely. The 3-12 shooting from three-point nation might suggest fatigue more than effort, but, in my opinion, execution was the biggest issue, both offensively and defensively. The 19 turnovers were the gaping flaw, closely followed by the three-point woes. I mean, last year during the regular season (still an anomaly in my opinion), and even in the postseason, didn't the team struggle the most when it turned the ball over too often and failed to hit its three-point field goals (the other issue was rebounding of course)? But turnovers are nothing new for this core of players. We've been talking about turnovers since Garnett, Pierce, and Allen united. It's not like last season was the first time turnovers plagued this group. And if those two things happen against a subpar opponent (like in last night's game), it's not outlandish to think that that opponent will stand a fighting chance. If Ray Allen hits that three-point field goal from the left wing with 58 seconds left and ties the game at 89, unleashing an entirely new ending that results in a Celtics win, we're sitting here much calmer. Some shots just didn't fall. It happens. Bad losses always wreak havoc with our emotions. 

I'm sure the nightmare that was last season is still hanging over us somewhat, and last night brought back some bad memories. But I say we let this team play more than just two games before we deem it 2009-2010 all over again. Bring on the Knicks.

Comment 114 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Not worried

You can see how good this team can be, but it will take time and some losses for them to get to where they need to be.

by itsgabriel on Oct 28, 2010 1:20 AM EDT reply actions  

reality check

“I don’t think last night’s loss, in any way, means this team is diverting down the path it took last season. We can’t say that after just one loss.”——————-this is pathetic——Celtics better not be in denial of the very statistic that caused them to loose to LOS ANGELES LAKERS—-REMEMBER THE FAMOUS WORDS FROM JACKSON—-“CELTICS have lost more games than any other team in the 4th quarter….” Obvious there is something wrong with this team beside AGE—-its got to be Atitude—-Shaq said it well——“overconfident”—-Pierce said in interview during finals—"wer going to L A to wrap it up….REALLY…….well believe what you may—I love the Celtics and watched them since the sixties—Bill Russell and company——and I have this to say——you want to maintain momentum through the 4th quarter—you need superior shooting—-so would you take a west or wafer over a Carmelo Anthony??? well if you leave finals again a looser —your chances I believe would be better with Carmelo than other way around—-26 points a game….NO Brain er!!!

by zappo007 on Oct 28, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

It sounds like you love to talk about getting Carmelo in almost every single post

Without saying how exactly the Celtics would get him. I can’t lie, I’m starting to feel like you’re saying that out of spite.

by Tai on Oct 28, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

positive attitude

That’s what is lacking——“FIND A WAY OR MAKE ONE” Ainge can do it——-He needs to give a few players and money and a draft pick—-but you will not replace a star like Pierce or Allen with a mediocre shooter———Celtics need to find stars proven to continue down the road or you will be facing a 20 year drought similar to the LEN BIAS fiasco—-remember????How can you stay competitive unless you find talent that will Build your team..

by zappo007 on Oct 28, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

So...

“A few players and money and a draft pick”? So which players do you give for Melo?

by Tai on Oct 28, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

It always comes down to Rondo and either Perk or Davis in order to get the $ to work.

Like that is going to happen? For a guy that wouldn’t get Ubuntu if you gave him 4 U’s?

by GetYourSoxOn on Oct 28, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he is a free agent, the Celtics can't trade for him.

and they cannot trade Lasme since he is not under contract.

He makes over 17 million this year, good luck matching that salary.

by GetYourSoxOn on Oct 28, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Zappo, do you see some scenario outside of giving up Rondo and maybe Baby

… to get Carmelo? Because short of giving up Rondo, I think Denver hangs up the phone.

Look, I’d like for us to trade for LeBron while we’re at it too, but if there’s no realistic scenario to get him, then I won’t post ’Let’s trade for LeBron’ on a daily basis.

So let’s hear your realistic trade scenario where we get Carmelo. If there is none, then why keep posting about getting him every day?

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

by Mencius on Oct 28, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

patience

wait till carmelo is a free agent—middle of this year and you will not worry about giving anything

by zappo007 on Oct 28, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

you do realize that

melo wont be a FA until next year adn that you need cap space to sign FA’s right? we’d have to trade ray, pierce and kg for no contracts coming back just to get to the salary cap number. we’d then have to trade away the amount of salary that melo would want per season with no contracts coming back in order to sign melo. so basically you end up with a team of bradley, west, melo, harangody, shaq, thats a playoff team if i ever saw one.

melo to the celtics? you have a better chance of seeing jesus walk again

"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

i can just see delonte west winning a game of poker against lebron, throwing down the cards he yells, "who's your daddy!"...."oh, sorry man"

by remembering9ergods on Oct 28, 2010 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

3 quarter team

So far this year the Celtics have not come out in the 4th quarter. Yeah we beat the heat, but in case you didn’t know a 20 point lead became 3 with little left in the fourth quarter. And if it wasn’t for Ray’s 3, who knows what would have happened. All I know is Doc needs to address this, this ain’t hockey, you got to play the full 48

by 80skid on Oct 28, 2010 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I laughed out loud

when I just heard the Celtics lost to Cleveland. This is a perfect example of “THE SWITCH”, but I hope “it’s” on all the time, so it won’t be like last year’s regular season. No need to worry really.

"We have to do the impossible, but it is possible." -Kevin Garnett

by afable0102 on Oct 28, 2010 2:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Okay, I'll bite:

Isn’t the 2nd game of the season a bit early to fall into the complacency and letdown of a ‘trap game’?

by clover on Oct 28, 2010 2:17 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree - give the Cavs credit

To diminish their effort isn’t reasonable – they will prove that indeed LeBron DID have help in Cle

by nba is the worst on Oct 28, 2010 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, why can't LBJ get a supporting cast like that in Miami?

I doubt Miami’s record this year will be as good as Cleveland’s the last 2. The playoffs should be interesting.

by clover on Oct 28, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

the cav's are built around athletic hustle players this year

those are the teams we usually struggle with, give them alot of credit. side show bob and hickson were a handful

"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

i can just see delonte west winning a game of poker against lebron, throwing down the cards he yells, "who's your daddy!"...."oh, sorry man"

by remembering9ergods on Oct 28, 2010 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's early but...

Also keep in mind the C’s started last season 23-5 before they coasted the rest of the way. They don’t have the luxury to lose these type of games early in the season, and with the Eastern Conference much improved home court might prove more valuable this season.

One loss isn’t a big deal but the way it happened is worrisome…

Careless turnovers, horrible 3 point shooting and being outhustled all were crucial elements in tonight’s loss.

Last season the C’s led the NBA in blowing double digit leads and did so again tonight. They were dominated in the 4th quarter with the starters unable to put away a Cavalier team starting 3 bench level players that might not even make the C’s roster.

by warnerjohn on Oct 28, 2010 2:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Agree

avoiding careless losses is something the C’s need to do a better job of this year.

by fordescort on Oct 28, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

100% correct

I totally agree—Doc you need to drive this team better——find the switch and turn it up or find trades that will make it happen——suggest CARMELO ANTHONY!!

by zappo007 on Oct 28, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

You never once have said anything that makes sense.

Regarding how they would ever bring in Melo…

I mean really, Paul is already signed for 4 years, and they play the same position. So is one of them going to come off the bench? What are you doing to give Denver to make this work, what assets do you have that other teams couldn’t match or beat? Davis? Draft picks?

Regardless of the fact that Anthony is in my mind the single most over-rated player in the entire NBA, and I wouldn’t even give up a first rounder for him straight up. But if you’re going to jump into every thread and yell CARMELO ANTHONY, at least make some argument that’s intelligent.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

... And the silence is deafening

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

by Mencius on Oct 28, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

A few bad calls never hurt either...

In order to hype up the game on Friday against Miami for Cleveland, which is to be nationally televised. Good ploy by Stern and the refs, who clearly gave some gift calls tonight.
The blocked shot by Garnett that was called a goaltend, the Technicals on Nate and Shaq, the 3 second Anthony Parker 3 point shot with one on the shot clock, etc. Granted, we still should’ve beat this team of scrubs, but we were playing on a back to back, and I think we still would’ve pulled out the W without all of the crap calls.

by Tradetime on Oct 28, 2010 2:38 AM EDT reply actions  

He's got a point though.

You can’t honestly tell me you watched that game and didn’t scream “WTF!” at each of those calls he just mentioned. They were god awful. And the Parker 3 that basically put the nail in the coffin was atrocious, watch that play in real time and do a count for yourself, you’ll hit a full 2 count before you even see him rise up, nevermind let go of the ball.

They didn’t start the clock till he was already into his shooting motion, a good second and a half after he touched it.

Ridiculous call by the officials.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

That one was close at least.

I gotta admit, I looked at at a number of times and really couldn’t tell. For that matter I don’t think it was conclusive enough to overturn the call on the court.

But whatever, at least it was a tough call.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Early Games

It’s not unusual for teams to get unexpected wins or losses early in the season. So on that alone I would not panic. But honestly, the Cs aren’t nearly as good as they will be once West comes back and JO gets into playing shape. Nevertheless, the last few years they’ve had trouble with turnovers, and this year doesn’t appear to be any different. So there are going to be games they just give away. And this was one of them.

Hats off however to the Cavs. Great way for them to start their season.

by amenhotep04 on Oct 28, 2010 6:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Von Wafer

Stats: 1 TO in 7 minutes of play. Is it time to call Lasme back?

by braz on Oct 28, 2010 6:39 AM EDT reply actions  

alright, alright

I don’t care for Wafer, but as a criticism, that’s pushing it a might, don’t you think?

by no kidding on Oct 28, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Biggest mistake they made.

Was keeping Wafer on.

He’s proven already the pre-season wasn’t a fluke. And he’ll be relegated to resident towel waver, soon as Delonte comes back. He looks completely lost on the court, and refuses to pull the trigger.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Glad you brought up the Indiana loss early in 08-09

This seemed very similar… the Celtics, spinning off an emotional, hyped win over a good team proceed to lose to a bad team that’s psyched for its home opener.

by Hila on Oct 28, 2010 7:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Cold

Not worried, but hoping Nate starts to find his groove soon. As for Wafer — the one thing the guy was called for to do is shoot. The invisible man.

by Tenacious D on Oct 28, 2010 7:29 AM EDT reply actions  

They’d have been better off last night with Lasme—at least he would have stayed on the bench.

by clover on Oct 28, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Panic?

It’s game 2 of a season that promises more than 100 games!!!!!

by Luke Walton on Oct 28, 2010 7:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Back to Back games

The Cetics are going to struggle in every back to back game. Just the age of this team. Other than that, they will be fine.

1.14.10, the day I went green.

by njnick on Oct 28, 2010 8:05 AM EDT reply actions  

have to agree

btw, how many back to back do the c’s have?

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on Oct 28, 2010 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think it is at all an overreaction

To think that the obvious lack of effort last night is concerning.

Sure, it’s always tough to play come off of a highly emotional win and play an inferior opponent the very next night. There is bound to be a letdown. That being said, this team has shown a pattern of not bringing their “A” game against lesser opponents. They seem to just not care about the result. Shaq, himself, even said “we took the them a little to lightly”.

Overall, I am in no way going to lose faith in this team even if they do tank games like this again this year. Didn’t last year, check my posts if you’d like. When the C’s bring their best, they are the best. On the other hand though, games like this sure will make it another frustrating regular season.

by KG's Knee on Oct 28, 2010 8:21 AM EDT reply actions  

KG had 9/15

To me, his rebounding is the best thing about this year so far (2-game avg 12.5 rpg)

by nba is the worst on Oct 28, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

KG looks spry out there. It would be fantastic if he can continue to pull down boards at this rate, or close to it, over the course of the entire season.

by KG's Knee on Oct 28, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

He looks aggressive.

Which is something that is encouraging, he’s not just going after rebounds, he’s battling for them. Grabbing and ringing the ball in with ferociousness. He’s attacking rebounds, not just letting them come to him, which we saw too much of last year.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

where's rondo's headband?

i’m not very updated right now. so what happened to rondo’s headband?

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on Oct 28, 2010 8:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Stern banned upside down headbands

So I’m guessing Rondo just decided to move on from the headband out of principle.

All I can say is, Stern sure is a fascist. I just wonder when the uprising will finally happen.

by KG's Knee on Oct 28, 2010 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I find it hard to object to any swipe at Stern...

But the fact is, Rondo stopped wearing his headband during his scrimmages with the U.S. National team during the summer. So I’m not sure his lack of a head band has anything to do with Stern.

by no kidding on Oct 28, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

P.S.

GO CELTICS!!!!!!!!!!

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on Oct 28, 2010 8:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Back to back's definitely hurt early

The team needs to get it’s legs. A home & road back to back is a tough early test. The most encouraging thing I’m seeing from these 2 games is KG’s rebounding numbers. If KG, Pierce and Rondo can board with some consistency, the team will be in good shape. Turnovers and fouls were problems in both games so far. Some of that could be early jitters and quick whistles.

A running theme for the C’s is when Rondo’s scoring is up, the team usually loses. I do think he’s got a tough job looking for his offense and distributing. But teams are always going to give him space overdoubling out PP and Ray. Rondo just has to take good shots.

by LuckyNumber07 on Oct 28, 2010 8:55 AM EDT reply actions  

With the C's deep bench....

I assume back to backs will not be as much of a concern as opposed to if the C’s had a thin bench.

Doc needs to watch the starters minutes much carefully during back to back games and utilize the bench more so then in non back to back games to protect the starters from fatigue etc.

by fordescort on Oct 28, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we could get something, anything, out of JO, it'd help our cause

Delonte coming back will make the second unit function much smoother, I think, and allow both Paul (by allowing Quis to play backup 3 almost exclusively) and Ray to get a few more minutes rest, and allow Nate to be more effective by playing off the ball more. Baby has been great so far, continuing his fine play from the preseason.

JO has been a disaster so far though. Even Semih getting a few minutes will help keep Shaq and JO’s minutes down. Might not seem like much, but over the long haul, the difference between playing 24 minutes and 19 a game could be a great thing for Shaq. (I never thought I’d be saying this back in the SL.)

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

by Mencius on Oct 28, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree Delonte coming back will be a big lift.....

and should help Nate’s game improve as he has struggled in the first 2 games of the season so far.

Jermaine should come along soon hopefully also.

In the preseason considering he was injured and playing limited, inconsistent minutes he played well…rebounding, defending the low post, blocking and altering shots especially.

He just seems to be in a bad rut starting out the season just like Nate.

Hopefully Jermaine, Nate and the rest of the C’s will work out the kinks in practice and in the upcoming games and all will be running on all cylinders soon.

by fordescort on Oct 28, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I liked JO's post defense in the preseason too.

Man, he’s been lousy the first couple of games though. On the bright side, it can only get better.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

by Mencius on Oct 28, 2010 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

True.

Of course it’s never really a good thing when you have to say the line “well it can’t get worse” when it comes to… um anything in sports.

by Sizzlack on Oct 29, 2010 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would hope not

seeing as how it was 2nd game of the season.

Perfect storm:
Boston played down
Cleveland played up

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Oct 28, 2010 9:23 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

Home opener for an underdog team coming off an emotional summer.
Road back 2 back for the Celts after an emotionally draining home opener of their own.

It isn’t really that complicated, is it.

by mmmmm on Oct 28, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree.

But given what happened last year, it’s something to be monitored. If this becomes a habit it will be problematic.

I mean, if it wasn’t for their what… 20-3 (or whatever it was) start up until Christmas, where would that team have ended up last year?

Here’s a sobering thought for you, what if they play the whole season that way? Hows the 8th seed sound to anyone?

by Sizzlack on Oct 29, 2010 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

8th seed?

That means we get to play Orlando in the 1st round.

by GetYourSoxOn on Oct 29, 2010 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

It would mean no easy rounds through the entire playoffs.

Which is exactly my point, they can’t play an entire season the way they played the second half of last year. They wouldn’t of gotten away with it last year without that great start.

So although, yes, this is just one game, and there’s no reason to panic, it needs to be monitored. Their going to have to start taking every team serious and not taking nights off in these “trap games” they can’t afford to do what they did for half of last year.

by Sizzlack on Oct 29, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

my previous post was purely a joke aimed at the Heat

and had nothing to do with jumping on the Panic Train.

I think back-to-backs were invented just to give the lesser teams a chance at an upset. If the entire season was spent with 2-3 days (2.5 on average, more or less, for a 30 week season) between games, the bottom dwellers would be more likely to “lose when they are supposed to”.

When the traveling team loses on the 2nd game of a back-to-back, it is just part of the natural processes of life and nothing to get excited about.

Speaking of nature and/or of natural things, I just saw over 200 geese fly over me when I was walking my dog out back. I heard them easily 10 minutes before I saw them. Their cacophony reminded me of this (and other) Celtic boards after a tough loss. (LOL)

by GetYourSoxOn on Oct 29, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

JJ Hickson

Guy just has huge games against us! Did no one on this team watch tape from last year when he ran silly when Shaq (then with Cle.) was either out or hurt ? That’s what was the most frustrating for me to watch, like “there he goes again”. If they contained him at all we win, but they didn’t. Pierce and Allen a combined 9 for 25, allowed them to get out and run, and our bigs can’t keep up with guys like Hickson on the break.

by evrock on Oct 28, 2010 9:57 AM EDT reply actions  

Hickson is a great player.

This is going to be a breakout year for him.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

No need to panic is right....

The C’s should be fine…they just have to work out some kinks.

Also just like I posted after last nights game I think the main reason the C’s struggled last night and in the opener (even though they won it) was because I think the bench lacks depth and fire power at this given moment.

Its odd to say that since the bench was suppose to be a big weapon this season for the C’s ….but at the moment the bench is struggling and not contributing (other then Daniels and Baby who are playing well) due to the fact.

Nate is struggling
Jermaine is struggling.
Shaq is starting (so he offers no punch off the bench)
Delonte is out due to his suspension.
Erden is not getting minutes (due to his shoulder?)

I think though the C’s will be fine short term once Nate & Jermaine work out of their ruts, Delonte comes back from his suspension and if Doc can gives Erden some minutes off the bench.

Long term they will be in even better shape once Perk comes back and Shaq moves back to the bench to add depth to the 2nd unit along with Jermaine, Baby, Delonte , Nate Daniels and Erden.

We just have to be patient until then.

by fordescort on Oct 28, 2010 10:05 AM EDT reply actions  

I wasn't surprised at all but a bit frustrated when watching

It will be the same way all season no matter who play on the 2nd night of a back to back.

Also, factor in the mentality and psychology behind it… and it becomes more reasonable. Cavs fans in that stadium were rocking last night. They wanted/needed this win more then we did against the Heat.

Because we beat Lebron… the Cavs painted a target on us and played as though if they beat us they too were beating Lebron. They played like they were playing for the dignity of an entire city last night. Those emotions might stick around for a while but it will be hard for the Cavs to keep that feeling all season.

I’m actually OK with this loss. It really does make Lebron even worse, much worse, IMO. That he still can’t beat Boston but his old team can without him.

by incoherent. on Oct 28, 2010 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Let's not forget Kendrick Perkins

Perkins is one of the best defensive centers in the league. He also has been playing with the other starters since 08. The O’Neils just are not the same level of chemistry or skills. Hopefully, he will be at full strength by February. He will be a like a great trade deadline pickup.

by John70 on Oct 28, 2010 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Don't get too excited

About Perkins return. Even if he is technically healthy, he will by no means be at 100% this year. Even if he is back in February which is being generous, he will still be very rusty for a few months and may not even be that helpful by the end of the year.

Don’t forget that it took Garnett at least a year to get back to what seemed like normal. Perkins may be able to help defensively in some instances but he will be a bit slower and have less lift which was not one of the strong parts of his game anyway. I just don’t think we should get too excited about Perkins’ return this season. I don’t think he is going to help out as much as everyone thinks.

The C’s need to learn to use the 2 O’Neal’s and Erdin as best as possible because we are going to need them.

by DjRyB on Oct 28, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good points

But isn’t Perkins’ knee injury different than Garnett’s? Garnett had micro fractures which take forever to heal. Perkins I thought had just torn ligaments, which heal quicker. Also, Perkins is younger than Garnett and will heal faster. I bet he comes back better and quicker than you think.

by John70 on Oct 28, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

speculatin is useless

No one can see into the future so none of us should be actin like we know exactly how perk will be when he comes back. Are we there w/him in rehab? No so none of us know how he’ll be.

by kobeshesnotconsenting! on Oct 28, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

That’s kind of my point. We can’t be waiting for his return and expecting an automatic impact. I think the C’s need to make due with what they have and pretend Perkins won’t be coming back so if he is good to go, it will be an added bonus.

by DjRyB on Oct 28, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Instead of comparing Perk's rehab and return to KG,

I would compare it to Leon Powe’s rehab and return. Leon STILL isn’t playing, although he was activated last spring.

by GetYourSoxOn on Oct 28, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

More the system than his health.

The Cavs team wants to run, and with his injury issues, putting those kind of heavy miles on the tires is bad for Leon.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good points all, DjRyB

Exactly what I project for Perk this year too. Anything better will be a pleasant surprise.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

by Mencius on Oct 28, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree % John70

As I posted above getting Per back will be a great boost.

We are lucky Danny was able to bring on board Shaq, Jermaine and even Erden to add big man depth the C’s I think definitely needed to add to the roster….but all that depth really gets lost if Perk is not playing and contributing.

Perk is the back bone of the C’s defense and if he can returns healthy and can contribute even at 65-75% later in the year I think that he will give the team a great boost and intensify the big man depth they have.

Until Perk returns though I think the C’s will be fine with Shaq . Jermaine and Erden holding down the fort once they get in a groove as we progress into the regular season..

by fordescort on Oct 28, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Momentum Shifted On the Nate & Shaq Techs

I think that is when it all went downhill. The momentum completely shifted to the Cavs and the players and Cavs fans saw their opening and took advantage of it.

I still can’t get over that tech on Nate. If anything, it was an offensive foul but definitely not a technical. If you watch the replay, you see Nate jumping ridiculously high with his legs out and when the whistle was blown his head was turned towards half court. He certainly didn’t push off on purpose or at least in a malicious way. The guy is 5’8 and his head was above the rim. The guys feet are going to be high up on any defender. It was still unreal that he made that shot somehow.

I don’t even understand what Shaq did because they didn’t really show it but it looked like the ref was trying to show him up by waving his hands like a jerk for Shaq to go sit down. I have no idea what was said but it didn’t look like Shaq was flipping out by any means. Are guys not allowed to even ask a question these days without getting a T? Brutal.

Anyway, I think that’s when it all went downhill. very disappointing.

by DjRyB on Oct 28, 2010 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

One thing on the Nate Tech

First, Nate was called for travelling and the whistle blew well before he drove to the basket for the layup. Honestly, I think this fact, combined with Nate’s flailing foot into Hollins’ (what it Hollins?) groin was the reason the tech was called. Nate never should ahve driven to the hoop after the whistle was blown. As for the Shaq thing, I also do not understand why he was T’ed up.

by vinnie on Oct 28, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

celtics

The problem is Doc, he doesnt put much faith in his 2nd team to hold their own. He has to let them play more in the last quarter, and rest the regulars. The days of the big three playing 40 minutes are over. This is the NBA and all the players are very good, or they wouldnt be here, and you you have to play with motivation every night, thats what separates champions, from chumps. The Celtics thought Cleveland was a night off from having to play hard. They got their first lesson in stupidity.

by angloamer on Oct 28, 2010 11:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Check the box score man.

Only Rondo got anywhere near 40 minutes (38) Pierce had 33, Allen 35, Garnett 29.

Problem was the bench didn’t hold it’s own (Davis and Daniels played well though.) They had plenty of minutes to get it done, but Wafer was non-existent, and JO did nothing but travel and commit fouls. Starters finally put a run together in the 4th and looked to be pulling away, until two ridiculous technicals killed all momentum and things went south quick.

Can’t blame Doc for that.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Screw the cookie

Wafer deserves to be cut

by Warrior Spirit on Oct 28, 2010 1:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I don't even understand the reason for the article - let alone the Panic

Don’t make me post the first picture of the season of Chicken Little on Game 2!!!!

don’t make me ….

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Oct 28, 2010 11:44 AM EDT reply actions  

No worries

So they sold cleveland short. The Cavs are gonna win alot of games that way. I mean, they’ll play hard, and they are likely to sneak up on teams.

Nevertheless, the Celtics are built to win when it matters.

Check out my Celtics season preview:

http://sonofsambowie.blogspot.com/2010/10/you-havent-heard-last-of-us-2011-boston.html

by jhathwell on Oct 28, 2010 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

what kind of coaching

shaq should have been playing in the 4th quarter …….. dumb rotation, just like last year…
to many turnovers by rondo (rolanda) and paul ……

by juanpan on Oct 28, 2010 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Stop that!

Rajon is awesome and we’re grateful to have such an incredible player on our team.

by mmbaby on Oct 28, 2010 1:37 PM EDT reply actions  

He wont though.

Bad as Robinson has been, Wafer has been worse.

So West will eat Wafer’s minutes. Daniels will exclusively be the 3. I think West coming back will help Robinson immensely, those two seemed to have a VERY good chemistry in the pre-season. Robinson needs to play off the ball some, he does not excel as the primary ball hander. He needs to be catching and shooting, running of screens, getting the ball in motion and making quick cuts. West’s ability to play the point will help both players succeed, as neither will have to be the primary PG and both can keep defenses on their heels by switching up looks and forcing defenders to switch from on-ball defenders to off-ball defenders on every possession.

by Sizzlack on Oct 28, 2010 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I wanted and figured theyd win

But this game meant more to the cavs and city of cleveland than it did to us. I for 1 am happy that they were able to pull out their 1st victory as a team post lebooboo.

by Warrior Spirit on Oct 28, 2010 1:48 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

the blimp

thats what shaq looked like in that pre-game jump suit. lol

"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

i can just see delonte west winning a game of poker against lebron, throwing down the cards he yells, "who's your daddy!"...."oh, sorry man"

by remembering9ergods on Oct 28, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

This was quite frankly an early X-Mas present

The Cavs desperately needed the first game at home and Boston, is Boston. They don’t really ever care until the post season either way, they just win because their talent over matches everyone else. Why would anyone in their right mind doubt the Celtics ever again based on the season’s wins or losses? Would you rather have a Lebron like season powerhouse or a playoff powerhouse like the Celtics? No both is not an option. The Celtics will lose stretches of games due to disinterest or sloppiness. Put a best of seven tag on it and watch who gets to four first though.

If you were a man I would punch you, right in the mouth.

by Eric9321 on Oct 28, 2010 4:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Young legs matter in back-to-back games.

And there’re 2 more of them before Delonte West is back, one against Milwaukee and the other against Dallas. They better keep their turnovers down in those games.

by alley oop on Oct 28, 2010 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, panic. Panic now.

The team that played Game 6 of the Finals like it was a pickup game, like they WANTED to lose… the team with the astoundingly misplaced hubris to think they could always win Game 7, the team that lost its heart completely after 2008… that team is not going to win much in 2010. Prediction: the Celtics will end with a record just slightly better than .500, and will not make it out of the first playoff round. These guys are too old to care… they’re in it now for the money, and nothing else. (Yeah, KG too.)

by JR99 on Oct 28, 2010 8:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Dumbest thing I've ever seen written.

If they were in it for the money they wouldn’t have re-signed.

Paul could of gotten paid a lot more elsewhere, so could have Shaq, so could have Ray. Ray could have easily gotten a team to bite on a 3-year deal. But he settled for 2 knowing Boston wasn’t going to sign anyone past 2012 (except Paul, but he’s younger, and well… it’s Paul Pierce.)

They are all about winning, and after last year, getting a championship is probably the only thing they care about.

by Sizzlack on Oct 29, 2010 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

missed delonte west

i think the whole team will be alot better when delonte is back with us.

"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

i can just see delonte west winning a game of poker against lebron, throwing down the cards he yells, "who's your daddy!"...."oh, sorry man"

by remembering9ergods on Oct 28, 2010 8:42 PM EDT reply actions  

100% agree.

Wafer is useless, he’s replaced Bad TA, and there is no good side to him. It’s basically playing 4 v 5 when he’s on the court, the guys a ghost. Of course with how JO played too, it was like playing 3 v 5 for parts of that game.

West had great chemistry with Nate in the preseason, and having another guy who can play the point well on the court allows Nate to play off the ball, catch and shoot, or get the ball around screens when he’s in position to make a move. He’s excelled in that role during the pre-season, and West coming back will do great things for the team.

I really hope they cut Wafer when West is back, he’s painful to watch.

by Sizzlack on Oct 29, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

We'll bounce back

We get the Knicks at home next.

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on Oct 28, 2010 10:32 PM EDT reply actions  

It's just like a Get Well Soon card.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

by Mencius on Oct 28, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Sanity Check II: Still About KG and Pierce
Small
Big 4 + One

Recent FanPosts

Small
Rondo's 2nd All-Star Appearance
Small
Charles Oakley calls KG & Perk "fake tough guys"
Images_small
What About This...
Small
trade with Utah
Small
Rajon Rondo Shooting Jumpers Is A Good Thing
Yowhasgoodggreen_small
We need to SHAKE things up....
Small
Draft
Small
Danny Please Make some moves! Ideas!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi