Nate Robinson: Taking the Bad with the Good
I think I'm starting to "get" Nate Robinson. At least, I'm beginning to understand how I feel about him, which is a big step -- my feelings about Robinson have been a roller-coaster since he was traded to Boston this past February.
This is what I've settled on (and yes, it will be a roundabout story):
I used to be a lifeguard at a public pool, which had its ups and downs. The ups were a nice tan, a job that doesn't actually require any semblance of working, and the ability to flirt with the better-looking mothers. And the downs? Well, the kids.Actually, for the most part I loved the pool kids. There were just a few troublemakers who caused me headaches every day. There was one boy, and he was a kind little boy. He was also, sadly, the most annoying little kid in the world. You hate saying that about young children, but, well, I lifeguarded this kid for three years and I don't think there was ever a time when he stopped talking. Not even once. The best part of my day was always when his mother called out, "Time to go home!"
There was another boy who was bad news. He was the type of kid who would try to drown a "friend," then pretend like nothing had happened when I intervened. Even though, you know, I'd just seen him choking his friend out two seconds before. "We were just having fun!" he would inevitably say. Then I would look over at the friend, whose face would be purple because he could barely breathe.
The third troublemaker, I didn't hate. Not at all. Maybe I should have. This kid would break every pool rule, every single day. I would tell him to walk, and 0.2 seconds later he'd be sprinting full speed. I'd tell him to stop splashing, and the next thing I knew his friends would be under a barrage of splashing water. I'd tell him not to do a back flip, and -- wouldn't you know it? -- his next dive would be a back flip.
But there was a difference to the third boy's troublemaking -- it was all in good fun. He wasn't annoying, and he wasn't choking out any of his friends. Mostly, he didn't harm anything or anybody at all. He just broke a lot of rules because he was a free spirit, because he was so excited to swim in the pool he couldn't contain himself. Every time he broke a rule, he'd get a look on his face, like, "Oops. I can't believe I just did that. I'm so sorry." And he always had a smile on his face, so I couldn't stay mad at this kid. I just couldn't, no matter how many rules he broke. It wasn't entirely his fault. He just couldn't help himself.
In case you are still wondering, the third boy is the swimming pool equivalent of Nate Robinson. Nate does some really stupid things on a basketball court. He loves pulling up for threes on 1-on-3 fast breaks. He occasionally makes dumb passes, and his height can hinder him defensively. There was one play Sunday when Robinson took a shot, over his head, literally without even looking at the hoop. It hit the side of the backboard and bounced off, and I imagine Doc Rivers sat on the sideline shaking his head in disbelief.
But I can't stay mad at Nate. Because on that very same play, Nate chased down his rebound and somehow passed it to Ray Allen in the corner, who made a bucket. The play after that, Nate made a nice defensive play which resulted in a fast break lay-in. A quarter or two later, a loose ball bounced on the court, and three different Indiana Pacers were in pursuit. Naturally, Nate, farthest away from the ball, dove on the floor and beat all three Pacers to it. Two or three plays after THAT, Nate dove into the first row of the stands, after a ball he probably never had a chance of reaching.
What I'm trying to say is this: Nate Robinson is not the world's smartest basketball player, nor is he anywhere close to it. But I can live with his occasional brain farts because I know everything he does has the right intention, because he does it all with a smile on his face, and because no matter how many times he screws up, I know he's actually trying as hard as he possibly can. He loves basketball, loves being part of a winner, and plays with the exuberance of Pool Troublemaker #3.
Will Nate cause me frustration at some point in the future? Inevitably, and it won't just be once. But I will forgive him, because, well, I get the feeling he just can't help himself.
20 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He's better than Eddie House
which was all we really needed. And you aparently worked at a much smaller pool than me, there were well over three kids that were bad at my pool, and you only mentioned hot moms…. nannies, au pairs, babysitters, the female liferguards and WSIs, and the camp councilors… not that I was counting.
This is by far
The best assessment of Nate Robinson I have ever read. I find myself feeling the exact same way when watching Nate play.
Great read, Jay_King!
Ditto, Jay you encapsulated my feelings as well.
"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said
Ditto ditto
You also validated stipulated enumerated and iperidated your story thanks
by bbeingphilled on Dec 21, 2010 9:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Nate
Nate reminds me of Big baby a couple of years ago, but hes cool with me, and he plays his ass off, even if he does screw up once in a while. Its hard to fault that. Rondo leads the leauge in turnovers, but you wouldnt trade him.
Nate
I mean he’s stepping up when we most need it. I just can’t imagine how much better he will become once both Rondo and West will return healthy. Robinson will be a huge scoring option comming of the bench. What a beast!!!! BTW great read thnx!! :D
There's a problem with that, though,
in that Nate doesn’t seem to play nearly as well in a bench role. I wonder if it’s a bit hard for him to keep his energy on a hum, while he waits to get onto the floor. Being a good bench player is an under-appreciated art in itself.
Somewhat true.
But Nate can shoot, so he brings more to the offensive table than Tony ever could.
Other than that, ya. Some definite Jekyl/Hyde type stuff in both of them.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
Selected excerpts from an email I got from a friend of mine after the loss to Dallas:
“—-Nate Robinson could not have been worse. At one point, Nate dribbled up top for about seven seconds and nobody seemed to have any idea what he was doing. You want to know why? He hadn’t called a play yet! Rondo was on the wing SCREAMING at Nate to call a play, and Nate finally did. I hope somebody else saw that, or I’m probably going to sound like a whacko.
— Just in case you didn’t already know, I’d kill Nate Robinson right now if I could. Like, honestly kill him. He got murdered by J.J. Barea! AHH!!!
— If any of you know Nate Robinson’s current address, please don’t tell me. I’m not trying to get life in jail."
How far we’ve come in quite a short time, though perhaps this guy didn’t have as easy a time “not staying mad” as Jay does.
Good piece, Skidmore. I always especially the ones showcasing your ability to weave personal anecdote into analogies to NBA current events.
-sw
Grouchy Oscar
I feel like we're part of an undeground society..
or maybe we’re just all hiding out in South America because we have a six-figure bounty on ours heads i.e. Mr. Omar Little. In any case, touche, Mr. Weinman. Well played, sir.
Take the good with the bad
Sunday’s game against Indiana was a perfect example of the dilemma named Nate Robinson.
Stats don’t tell the whole story - Nate was 7 for 15, scoring 18 points, grabbing 4 rebounds, had 2 assists and even blocked 2 shots. Overall those are pretty good numbers other than assists which were low because Paul Pierce was the primary distributor.
On the good side Nate made some nice shots including 2 great drives to the hoop, made some great plays on defense and provided great energy for the entire game.
However he also took a few terrible shots at the worst possible moments, can’t run the offense effectively and got burned numerous times by Collison and Ford. He makes terrible decisions when leading the break and looks lost out on the court at times. His energy is a force but at times he gets so overly excited about a basket or godo play that you can just see Paul, KG and Ray looking at him with disdain and wanting him to relax a bit.
A typical Nate sequence also occurred against the Hawks a few days ago. He makes a nice defensive play and is leading the break but throws it away with a terrible pass. He then compunds the problem by fouling the Hawks player on his layup, then on the next possession he airballs a wide open 3 pointer.
Overall Nate is a shooting guard forced to play at the point which really isn’t his fault. He really has made great strides since coming to Boston from New York. When Delonte comes back hopefully he will settle into a more defined role and provide points and hustle off the bench. He reminds me of an old Piston player Vinnie “the Microwave” Johnson who could come off the bench and change the came with his scoring and energy.
Nate “half and half” Robinson…
Yeah when Delonte is back it should be a lot better
The perfect situation for Nate would be to play with a bigger guard with point guard skills. That way Nate can defend the 1, but play the 2 on offense.
Delonte fits the bill, 6-4, can defend shooting guards, and can run the point effectively.
by UtopianAverage on Dec 21, 2010 6:42 PM EST up reply actions
Spot on!
This piece on Nate is spot on.
I love the juxtaposition that is Nate Robinson, i enjoy his work rate and his quick flashes of scoring, but heck he frustrates me also.
Nate
is my favorite player for all these reasons
Well done
I agree with the sentiment.
For those who use TA as an analogy, I don’t care for the comparison. TA was a disaster waiting to happen. Nate is more streaky as perimeter scorers tend to be.

by 
































