Marquis Daniels: Taking Advantage of Certain Matchups
I will get to Marquis Daniels and his exquisite game last night, but for now, I subject you to one of my insane, almost-but-not-exactly-related stories.
I was watching Prison Break late last night, because I'm newly addicted to the show. For those who watch, Michael Scofield (the main character) reminds me of Larry Bird.
Scofield doesn't wear short shorts, possess a viciously crooked finger, or make passes that encourage the name "Basketball Jesus," but -- like Bird -- he's always a step ahead of his opponents. It's like Scofield plays chess, while all the policemen and FBI agents trying to catch him play pin the tail on the donkey. If Scofield would grow a wispy mustache, tell Xavier McDaniel exactly where he was going to hit a game-winner, and offer Chuck Person an expletive-laced Merry Christmas, he'd be the exact fugitive equivalent of Larry Bird.
Anyway, before I lose ALL my readers with this absurd tangent, there's a point to my Prison Break talk. In the episode I watched last night, an FBI agent discussed his drug habit with a former addict, Sara Tancredi. The FBI agent used tranquilizers every day, and Tancredi told him something like, "You must feel like you're walking under water all the time."
Since I'm a Celtics freak, that quote made me think of one person: Marquis Daniels.
No, I'm not accusing Daniels of a tranquilizer addiction. Of course not. But you have to admit: compared to his teammates and opponents, Daniels often seems like he plays basketball under water. It's not that he's lazy, because he's not. It's not that he's unathletic, because he's not. Daniels just plays basketball at his own pace. Some people sprint; Daniels glides. Some people celebrate big plays; Daniels stays completely stone-faced. Some people possess another gear to drive by opponents; Daniels just patiently saunters by.
Not that Daniels' pace is a bad thing. Daniels' always-in-control, rarely-screw-up play is the perfect medicine to recover from the Tony Allen Error. Daniels can be frustrating at times, specifically when he disappears for long periods of play. I enjoy that he never forces anything, I do. But it's nice to have SOME production out of the backup small forward spot, and there are some nights when Daniels hardly produces anything. Yet for the most part, I'm perfectly content with Daniels' play. He doesn't always (read: ever) score at a scorching rate, but Daniels is a steady hand and versatile piece for the second unit. Even when his stat sheet remains close to empty, Daniels' presence on the floor doesn't hurt. He plays defense, refuses to take bad shots, and can play multiple positions. Most importantly, he's not Tony Allen.
And then, sometimes, out of nowhere, there are nights like last night. Nights when Daniels looks like he could be the NBA's best sixth man. Nights when he takes over a game, and the Celtics run their offense through him, and if you didn't know any better you'd think Daniels was a matchup nightmare each and every night. (Hint: he's not.)
What's different on those nights? Normally, it's Daniels' defender. Daniels is not the type of player who can destroy all defenders, but he can kill smaller players. When someone like Darren Collison or T.J. Ford defends Daniels, his eyes light up. (Or they would, if he knew how to show emotion.)
I say this all the time, even though it's probably a ridiculous exaggeration: if Marquis Daniels were seven feet tall, he'd be one of the best low-post players in NBA history. All Daniels needs is a slight height advantage, and the defender is at his mercy. Out come the herky-jerky post moves, and Daniels morphs into the league's best sixth man. Last night, I would even say Daniels took over the game. The Celtics ran their entire offense through him, as if he were their superstar.
But the key to finding mismatches for Daniels is his ability to defend point guards. Darren Collison and T.J. Ford are blurs, and Daniels is the player who often plays like he's on tranquilizers. Yet somehow, Daniels is able to stay in front of them. Just because Daniels normally plays with the patience of Buddha and the pace of Vince Wilfork doesn't mean he's incapable of occasionally pressing the turbo button. Because Daniels can defend quick PGs, the Daniels-Pierce-Allen lineup works.
Since Daniels excels when playing point guard in that backcourt trio, Kevin Garnett has suggested Daniels see more time with the first unit. (Boston Herald)
"I think when he’s very valuable is when he’s with us, when he’s with the first group," said KG, who had 11 points and 13 rebounds for his 14th double-double of the season. "He’s important to the second group, but when he’s with us I think he flows more. "You know, we lobby for him to play with us, but it’s however Doc sees fit for this team to win, and we all understand that, so it’s not a problem. It’s not a big issue or nothing, because Doc knows best and we follow that."
Maybe Daniels should see more time with the first unit for now, so he can utilize the mismatches that would inevitably come his way. But when Rondo returns from injury, the Daniels-Pierce-Allen backcourt will surely play together very irregularly, and Daniels will mostly play small forward.
In all likelihood, Daniels will remain steady. He'll play at his own pace, and sometimes seem to disappear, and mostly affect games silently. Then, on certain random nights, Daniels will go to work. He'll look like the game's best backup small forward, and you'll briefly wonder why he doesn't play so well every night. Then, you'll remember:
It's all about the matchups.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Danials is the guy you don't even notice for awhile
Till he suddenly explodes (Marquis style) and appears out of nowhere saving the ball, when he suddenly appears under the basket and dunks Rhondo’s pass, it’s always surprising to me.
He always looks like he’s in complete control of himself and his game. He’s so confident. He’s awesome. I think this is his break out year.
please
let’s not forget that without nate,
they don’t make it as far as they did last year
also, he’s getting a lot of minutes now that rondo + delonte
are unable to play – so nate has put together a few less than stellar
stat sheets of late, however, he and every other player on the team
is critical to their success of the team this season, including marquis daniels
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk
good piece-j. king. quissy is a dependable player when healthy and that’s the key. he has been injury prone, like delonte. with these 2 guys healthy we will be very strong. as good as he was last night at point, he is our best backup for pp and ray. i watched a few memphis games and tony allen is the same tony- great and awful at the same time.
It's nice to have options
The long season will surely give MD the opportunity to show his skills. He’s versatile enough to sub for three of the starters. And while I don’t know of any player out there who wouldn’t want to play on the first string with four hall of famers, I think MD’s hustle and defense will be greatly appreciated off the bench come playoff time. Saying he is better or worse than Nate is really an unfair comparison for both. Nate’s a firecracker who can explode for a lot of points or…well he can shoot 3 for 15. MD’s got the length and the skill to play defense the big time scorers out there. Who should see more playing time depends on the matchup and what kind of spark the team needs. I’m glad we have both. Our options at guard are better than they’ve been in a while (especially when DW returns and Rondo returns to his healthy form).
Best game I've seen Daniels play in Boston yet.
He impacted both ends of the floor, got Boston into some good sets, and set a tone for the offense.
Great to seem him playing up to what we’d hoped we got last year, but never really showed up. Now if he can just do it more consistently, he’ll be making a serious case for a new contract next year.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
not sure how to feel bout Daniels
I dont know bout daniels. I mean, his defense is normally very solid and he can be a real defensive pest at times…but then you look at the numbers, 5 PPG, 2 RPG, and you say, ‘eh’. I was hopin without injury as an excuse this year he could get up to at least 8 PPG. It’s just kinda dissapointin that 12 points out of daniels has us sayin he had a terrific game. You’d wish that was more routine but i guess this is Marquis. I’ll still take him over TA though cus at least he doesnt completely KILL the offense like TA did.
by kobeshesnotconsenting! on Dec 29, 2010 2:40 PM EST reply actions
I liked it
I just wish daniels was more aggressive and while Rondo is out he should be the starting point guard over Nate cuz the offense flowed so much better
Great write up, Jay!
Hilarious, interesting and pretty much spot-on!
I thought it was almost funny (in a cool way) how, by the end of the 3rd, start of the 4th, the rest of the Celtics were almost tripping over themselves to get the ball into Daniels’ hands since it was so obvious how well that was working, having him run point. Even Paul was quick to look for him as they brought the ball up.
Regarding the calls to make Daniels the starting PG over Nate, folks do need to keep in mind that not ALL matchups will favor Daniels as great as it did last night and also we DO need Daniels primarily to backup Paul.
If Daniels is playing point more, then that is fewer minutes he can spell at SF, which means we go to Wafer more for SF minutes to spell Pierce. Fortunately, Wafer has looked a lot better of late and indeed, he was in in that capacity briefly last night when Daniels was at point and Pierce went to the bench. So it may be fine. But last night’s matchups were kind of ideal for our bench to exploit.
Ultimately, the versatility that Daniels gives us is a nice extra weapon that Doc is probably happy to have in his arsenal.
my favorite Quisy play?
That half-court shot he hit against Toronto, think it was in the preseason. Just walked off the court like absolutely nothing had happened at all.
Excellent article.
I have been one of Marquis’ supporters since he arrived and appreciate your putting words to my feelings!
by thirstyboots18 on Dec 30, 2010 11:09 AM EST reply actions

by 






























