Danny Coming Up Empty So Far
The Boston Celtics discussed a possible trade for Caron Butler before the Washington Wizards decided to send him to Dallas. The Celtics also have inquired about the availability of Golden State Warriors guard Monta Ellis, Sacramento Kings guard Kevin Martin and Philadelphia 76ers swingman Andre Iguodala. None of the talks have become substantive.
The Celtics would likely include Ray Allen in any big deal, but have made it clear they want an upper-echelon young player in return, regardless of position.
The Celtics also reached out to the Phoenix Suns about Amar'e Stoudemire, but don't have the means to get a deal done.
Interesting names. Glad to hear that he's at least going after the kind of guys that would make a difference now and in the future. Not so glad to hear that we don't have the pieces that other teams want. That could change in the days leading up to the deadline, but I'm less than encouraged by this report.
Then again, if we keep Ray Allen and manage to sell off some spare parts for a less-big name player that can help, that's progress as well. I don't want to make a move for the sake of doing it, but I'd be a little disappointed (especially after all this talk) if we did something very minor or nothing at all.
I think this team could use a shot in the arm and a midsize to major deal might be just the thing to do it. What do you think?
130 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Troy Murphy would be interesting, but we need someone to guard big SGs
Ray does an admirable job on Kobe, but he just can’t stay with him. And somehow Petrius always seems to torch the Cs. Butler would have been nice to slot at SG for his size and defense. So maybe Magette?
But I also keep thinking that Troy Murphy would be a great PF. Basically he’d be what we were hoping Rasheed would be. Not the backup PG we need either, but someone who could fill in for KG. I love Big Baby, but he’s still undersized. I hate it when he’s our best go-to option in the post.
I've been thinking Maggette too... this trade works:
Maggette and Randolph for Davis, Scalabrine, House (or TA) and Giddens (or Walker)
Golden State shaves almost 8 mil from their guaranteed money next year, and get out of almost 18 mil owed to Maggette the following two seasons. Also they pick up a young athletic wing – either TA or Walker – who can probably play well in open court Nelly ball. They lose Randolph, yes, but gain a respectable young big in Davis…
Boston gets: bench scoring, athleticism, rebounding, a go-to 6th man, and a young big with upside
Maybe we have to throw in a draft pick to make this work. Anyone know how badly Golden State wants out from Maggette’s deal?
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions
or maybe i'm just a lunatic fan who thinks other teams are going to bend over backwards to solve C's problems?
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
sigh.... you're right
i’m trying to trade our trash for treasure. But aren’t there some pretty desperate teams out there? Our expiring trash has never been so valuable!
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 6:59 PM EST up reply actions
Kings are the only team I'd be interested in dealing with.
KMart is the only young player that fits this team’s starting lineup imo. Plus they actually have decent smaller pieces the Cs should be interested in like Jason Thompson, Beno Udrih, and Nocioni. But Sac doesn’t have much incentive to trade anyone right now, so looks like we’re standing pat.
I am in favor of any of the options on the poll, providing they improve us
A midsize deal in which Haywood could have been a part of may have stabilized our interior defense, rebounding and toughness. In the long run, Haywood may be the most significant player in the Dallas deal.
No Nickname – I like your thoughts on Murphy and Maggette. I don’t think Indiana gives up Murphy without some talent in return. Maggette may be able to be had for expiring contracts.
I think I want a definition of
“Blockbuster” as opposed to “mid-level”.
I mean, does blockbuster include JUST Ray Allen as far as significant players on our team? Or does it include Ray and Perk, for example?
I hope no Perk trades are involved… Him & Rondo are gelling well. then again, Brendan Haywood could’ve been a 2 year fix.
I’d say Ray is still hot enough to be considered “Blockbuster” to the media. Although, between a lot of fans Blockbuster seems to mean move Ray & KG (although the Ticket is going nowhere).
I'm on the fence
I’d say go for the middle level trade; while it’s true won’t be worth anything when he expires, I’m becoming weary of the current market. With restructuring occuring before the 2013 season, the Celtics should stay flexible & not opt into contracts past 2 years. The exception would’ve been to land the “right tools” such as Butler/Jamison.
I liked Iggy, but it seems that Dalembert (or Philidelphia’s other options) would be too hard to swallow. (I haven’t for instance seen Djru’s name being shopped).
What’s going on with the Raptors? They’re starting to be on the heels of the Celts, why would they want to strengthen a conference rival? Martin looked enticing, but his injuries did not. Frankly he needs to put weight on a 6’7 185lb frame (though I haven’t seen him play much).
Keep Ray, and let’s reshape the less utilized players (BBD, Eddie House, Scal). I support some of the ideas of reforming the line-up; Tony Allen starts with Ray off the bench. I’m hoping Paul starts taking the “scorer’s approach” back. This offseason will be too big & Boston needs to keep some Cap room to offset the Knicks/Cavs (with D-Wade & James taking free agency).
Iggy and Dalembert or Hinrich and Deng
If Wyc is willing to pay some money, the Iggy and Dalembert for Ray and BBD and Scal etc.. would be terrific. Dalembert would provide another expiring contract next year.
I think Chicago is the team that might be the most anxious to get an expiring contract, so they might be the most likely to give up Hinrich and Deng for Ray.
Excellent, great news that D has an expiring contract. Maybe this year showed that BBD has a ceiling to his development. After some of his playoff highs of last year, I thought he’d become more. Even though BBD has played better recently, I believe he hasn’t proved his value. Ray, Scal, BBD is a no-brainer as long as Iggy is worth it in the long run. Short term I could see an improvement.
what if...
if the Cavs get Stoudamire, then the Sixers might be willing to go to plan B and give Iggy to us for Ray
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
Well, Paul did say (and I quote)
“In June, I’m gonna be bringing home the gold”…right after winning the 3-point trophy. Maybe Danny and Wyc heard him and decided heck, he’s getting it for us anyway, why waste the money?
Danny..."Swing for the fences!"
Otherwise…even a 50 win season is out of the question!
I JUST WANT TO TAKE CARE OF OUR WEAKNESSES
I think we are wasting out time, focusing so much on a deal with Ray….yes his expiring requires that we look into it, but I think there is too much focus on that.
I think Danny should take care of THIS teams weaknesses first. because he says he is obligated to focus on this year, and getting 18, rather than focusing on wanting to be relevant in 2 years or so.
Which to me that means our first priority should be to get a backup point guard
Which to me means a priority should be to go out and get an young athletic big-man
Which means to me a priority should be to go out and possible add another wing.
After Danny has done all he can to ensure this current team, has all the pieces necessary, to compete for 18 in June……….then he can look at what to do for the future.
This is why i wish Danny would have already brought in a backup point, and an athletic big earlier in the season, because now he has backed himself in a corner, with less than 5 days to decide whether to trade Ray with the future in mind, or trade guys like Scal, TA, etc. to take care of the weak spots currently on THIS roster, and compete for 18 this June.
I say lets cover our weak spots, and worry about 18.
please trade scal and house for a 3 , ainge...
i shall have no problems with keep ray here…
by friedgreentomatoes on Feb 14, 2010 2:53 PM EST reply actions
Crazy talk I know, but Jeff started it with " What if"
What if we took on Elton Brand, Andrea Iguodalas contracts and Mareese Speights, Jrue Holiday, Jason Smith for Ray Allen, Baby, Tony, Scal and JR Giddens. The 76’s would clear cap space and we would have some young players to develop and trade off in future deals. We of course would do this deal because the 76’s (wink, wink) would buy Ray out and the core of our team would still be in place.
FYI – Brand is three years younger than Jamison.
What’s in this for Philly? Nothing but cap relief.
Remember, the subject was crazy talk.
Agreed. I like the notion of acquiring the NBA’s youngest player Jrue; i think that is one of the most important aspects of the trade. I still can’t believe Elton is being taken seriously… I thought his injuries had already taken toll on him. Then again, Houston is going to be able to unload T-Mac.
The buyout would be ridiculous! If that happened, I think we’d be laughing all the way through the playoffs.
midsize tweak
I feel the bench needs tweaking with a player like 6’9"swingman Travis Outlaw,who will be back mid-March from a foot injury,and maybe Augustine from the Bobcats to give Rondo some relief …so a midsize tweak would certainly help this bench where i feel is in need of athleticism plus scoring,rebounding and leadership by a true pt ga.
On your question "what are you hoping for"? I refuse the survey!!!!!
Here is my HOPE list
……Fresh Legs to the players we already have
……No more injuries
…….Renewed interest in 3rd and 4th Qtr team defense
……..More Sheed in the paint
………Quisy being aggressive
………TA’s best defense and not much dribbling
…… PP ISo’s to close out quarters … just keep the ball in Rondo’s hands and tell him to drive
……….Ray Allen hitting a groove
……….Patience!!!!
………..Ubuntu!!!!
………A big bowl of Lucky Charms
and no Hawks in the 1st round
Is it Soup Yet?
Does Not Compute
Are we being asked to believe that the Celtics could not have offered a better package for Amare than Ilgauskas’ expiring deal and JJ Hickson? I don’t believe that for a second.
Lol, Pho said they wanted cap space and a nice prospect.
Realistically, we can offer cap space but we’ve got ZERO prospects that have more potential than Hickson.
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
And Big Z...
Isn’t chopped liver, believe what you’d like on that, though.
Question....
If Danny already stated that he is not going to make any ‘major trades,’ why then are we entertaining the possibility of one? Is he lying?
First of all before fixing a problem with something you have to know what the problem really is. In our case the problem is the starting five, more precisely the big 3. Therefore bringing in a backup pg or changing the bench in any way won’t really help.
Our bench now that Daniels is back is fantastic. They outscored the opponents’ bench in our last two games, in the case of the Hornets it was fortysomething vs 14 pts to our bench and we still managed to loose that game. That shows how big the problem is with big 3. So anything less than a blockbuster won’t solve anything.
And no I don’t believe that they just magically will get healthy and will play as they 5 year younger selves. So in my opinion Ray has to be traded. The only question is for what. I’d say if we say goodbye to this year’s championship dreams and trade him for draftpicks even that would worth it.
making a trade is not the only way to fix the starting five
move Ray to the bench and start Quisy at the 2 – problem solved
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions
No it isn't.
First – off, Ray’s level of play hasn’t been the problem with the starting 5.
Second off – that would result in no spacing in the first unit (PP would be the only 3 pt shooter) and third it would reduce the slash & dish of the second unit.
Basically you would make both the starters and the second unit weaker with that move.
A 5 man unit requires a complement of roles.
5 man unit requires a complement of roles - agreed
but i think a lot of people would disagree that Ray’s level of play hasn’t been a problem with the starting five. Maybe Ray’s not THE problem, but what do you think is THE problem with the starters exactly? I think it’s a lack of athleticism which creates a lot of lagging offense and sagging defense. Marquis in the starting lineup addresses this problem…
MD also complements Pierce better than any of our other options off the bench. Yes, he is best offensively within 15 feet, but luckily Pierce and KG mostly score from outside these days, and RR is doing more of it… I don’t think it’s the spacing disaster you predict for the starters. And off the bench, TA and RA are great complements. How does RA in the second unit (playing less minutes overall) make the second unit weaker?
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 8:49 PM EST up reply actions
what do I think is the problem?
There is no single “the problem”. But if I was to pick one, I’d pick: Offensive turnovers.
Primarily by our younger big men (Perk, Williams & Davis) when setting picks.
I know you probably didn’t expect that answer – but that is what the numbers tell me is one of our biggest problems.
I created a fan post that explains it.
And what would this solve? We need a good 3 pt shooter to open up the paint. Daniels is anything but a good 3 pt shooter.
Actually the ideal trade for us would be a KG trade. He’s the one who shows the signs of decline the most. We are constantly outrebounded and the starting five shows no sign of energy. But with the contract he has and the play he shows he’s untradeable.
you might be right about KG being the weak link in the starting lineup right now
but as you say, he’s untradeable, and anyway he is kind of the heart of this team.
Regarding your reply though: “We need a good 3 pt shooter to open up the paint”
didn’t you see the all star game? We have a good 3 pt shooter in the starting lineup and his name is Truth. As Pierce’s game moves more to the outside, he becomes more complementary to guys like MD who score mostly within 15 feet.
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 15, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions
don't forget the first rule of rumor season
EVERYONE lies
except me, I am telling the truth, …I have nothing to report, but at least I’m not lying
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
ideas....
If Phoenix is willing to take Z and Hickson from Cleveland would they take Ray and Perk for Amare and Barbosa? Could Danny and Doc live with Stoudemire in the middle? Wouldn’t Perk have value around the league?
I would think Danny needs to work a three way to get pieces that Sacremento or Golden State would want to pry loose Martin or Ellis. Golden State seems to have the best young talent that I think would entice Ainge (Ellis, Morrow, Randolph) and I think Chicago still seems to be the team that would be most motivated to want to move payroll and take Allen in exchange.
Sometimes the expiring contracts you think will be pure gold to other teams doesn’t end up being that way in the end. Neither McGrady nor Allen may get moved.
On the other hand there’s still time to work New York against Chicago to want to slash more payroll for this summer.
Because I am nostalgic
I say do nothing so we can relive the post original big 3 era :-)
If Amare Stoudemie does go to the Cavs
Will it alter DA’s decision making for trades?
I think so
I think it would put more pressure on him to have to make a trade to look like he is not standing pat and is trying also to do all he can for his particular team.
This is good in one way, but bad also if he panics and makes a bad trade for just the sake saying he made one.
I voted for a midsize deal
Wich is, to me, a big upgrade of the bench, that might involve trading Ray but finally getting him back after he gets bought out.
I don’t think we need a blockbuster deal. An upgrade of our bench (guard and PG position) would be great, but other than that, we have all the pieces. We just need health and focus.
You gotta give something to get...
I say trade Ray for a big man. Boston’s defensive needs to improve and so does their rebounding. IE: Too many second chance opportunities. No guard is gonna solve these needs.
Sheed House and Scal for Diaw and Augustin (and Flip Murray if we can still him)
Not sure how reluctant Charlotte would be to lose Diaw, but they save over 6 mil this year and over 5 mil the following year. We could throw in a draft pick or Walker/Giddens if we had to.
C’s address two needs (backup PG and more athleticism in our big men) and condense some redundant roster spots. Adding Flip gives us scoring spark off the bench – comparable to Jamal Crawford…
Question is – are we toast w/out a backup center? Shelden?
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 4:50 PM EST reply actions
i am for it
but one caveat – i’m about 6 feet, I like to play inside, and my only talent is that I hustle more than anyone else. In other words, I am the exact opposite of Rasheed. Oh wait, I hate NBA refs… guess we’re not COMPLETE opposites…
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
Here is an interesting question to ponder. If it was somehow possible to predetermine that the Lakers had the team destined to win it all this year, and the Celtics management could trade all of their players for the Lakers team, would you do it? And if you did, would you be witnessing and cheering for the Celtics winning it all, or rather would you simply be cheering for the Lakers in Celtics uniforms?
Keep Ray. Cheer your guys. Live with the consequences.
I would never root for Kobe
even in a green uniform…….and without Kobe in your fantasy swap the Lakers don’t have anything we don’t have already
Is it Soup Yet?
Sure. I'd root for them.
Bringing in Sheed, Ricky Davis, and frankly Garnett too. There’s a lot of nose-holding going on when some players wear your team’s uniform.
Yes...As long as they`re wearing Celtic uniforms
At the end of the day…All we`re really rooting for is"laundry"
The season rides on what Danny does come the trade deadline.
The right move(s) can put us back in the hunt for a banner (if the rest of the team is healthy of course).
I think they need a to trade for a athletic power forward and big, strong wing defender scorer then sign a back up guard via buyout signing .
If no moves are made the C’s will we will have a much harder time getting a banner this year if one at all with the current roster.
So lets hope Danny does not come up empty after the deadline passes.
i thinkwe missed the boat
if the butler/jamison deal was true and we passed on it then wow we blew it. there’s no deal out there that I like as much although igoudala and lou williams for ray and fill in the blank would be nice. if cleveland gets amare it willhelp them but they lose a very good big man in ilgauskas and amare won’t be nearly the player he is in phoenix wihtout nash as his pg. still cleveland looks to be the odds on favorite to win the title even if they don’t get stoudemire. IF we start playing as a team instead of a bunch of individuals we can still get back in the hunt. we desperately need a pg to run the second unit.
If Amare Stoudemire goes to Cleveland
It’s a rap, Cavs will win Championship, period!
Assuming they trade Hickson and Big Z...
You’re left with Amare, Shaq, and Varejao has big men. I don’t know if the Cavs are that deep anymore this way.
Its already been reported that Z would get waived and resign with the Cavs
and you don’t think Leon would be a serviceable 4th or 5th big?
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
Oh, Big Z would go back?
Oh….ok. : \
Maybe there would be a problem, then.
Last year, the Cavs were supposed to win it... 2 yrs ago, the Lakers.
I’ve learned there’s no place for foregone conclusions in the NBA.
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
What?
Lebron, Shaq and Stoudemire, Now there’s a BIG THREE!
Amare & Shaq
did not work in Phoenix previously and Amare does not play a lick of defense. Hold the championship parade please.
People think that LeBron will wave his magic wand and suddenly Amar'e & Shaq will be a perfect fit.
And Amar’e will understand the concept of defense.
Because LeBron says “let it be so.”
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
Amare Stoudemie is a good fit
He is a consistant double double guy, he’s great in the open floor.
He’s also younger than Shaq and Ill.
He blocks shot
Hes much more versatile.
No need to call anyone names.
As I said above,
Last year, the Cavs were supposed to win it… 2 yrs ago, the Lakers.
I’ve learned there’s no place for foregone conclusions in the NBA.
how about we actually see if the trade for amar’e goes through… and even if it does, let them go through the rest of the season before everyone just hands them the trophy. There’s a reason the season doesn’t end at the all-star break.
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
With or without Amare...
The Cavs are a mortal lock to win it all this year!
They were a lock last year too....
oops, guess they didn’t get that memo.
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
No, they weren`t....
LA was destined to win it last year, and they did.
This is a new year!
True and true, but it doesn’t mean the same will happen here (if the trade gets done). Amare and Shaq didn’t work there but here they will have clearly defined roles, neither will be competing to be the big dog like they were in Phoenix. Shaq will be the Dwight/Bynum specialist and Amare will terrorize defenses by coming out of the pick and roll with lebron. And while other teams focus on Lebron and Amare theres no way they can double Shaq, and Shaq 1 on 1 is still a bad thing for most other centers in the league.
As for D, it’s not fair to judge how committed he is to defense because he’s been playing in Phoenix, noone plays D in Phoenix…it’s like a wife being mad at her husband for cheating on her after he was locked in the playboy mansion for years. I’m confident that he is talented enough to play good D once he is in our system.
Having said all that, you’re right that its too early to plan any parades. This trade would put us in a good position but theres still a long way to go and no fan should get presumptuous at this point in the season…we don’t want to turn into laker fans.
by CavsLebronFan on Feb 14, 2010 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
Agree
This is the same duo that worked together so well in Phoenix … LOL!
Plus, Amare is a cancer, even though people don’t like to admit it.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
Big athletic power forward ???
Any idea who we should target as “our biggest need”. I don’t think there are too many of those in the for sale bin.
No I'm Not
There’s a big difference between their “big 3” and ours. History is littered with lots of teams that were odds on to win and didn’t.
Reminds me of when the Devil Rays signed Vinny Castilla and Greg Vaughn
to team with Fred McGriff to form “Murderer’s Row.” Didn’t exactly work.
by post-it note on Feb 14, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions
NBA TV
David Aldridge was on The Beat show they have at 5pm EST and said Phoenix hasn’t even decided yet if they will move Stoudemire. He said that will happen in the next 48 hours. Amare has been playing better for them and it is not a forgone conclusion he will leave 17 million or so on the table. He said they also would want more than Hickson coming back. he still sees Jamison in play to Cleveland.
yeah - jamison fits the cavs way better
and is a guy i think will help them more than Amar’e.
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 14, 2010 6:56 PM EST reply actions
Supposedly Amare's preference is Miami with Wade
But LeBron told Cleveland management to get Amare. Interesting to see what Kerr does.
Amar'e makes more sense in Miami
Jamison would have a bigger impact in the Cleve – he’s exactly what they need with Shaq
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
i agree totally with this author excpet that i will be greatly disappointed if we do a minor
or nothing trade.
think about this, if no one is interested in ray allen or anyone else this year,
what chance do we have of getting anything for any of them next year and beyond.
one thing i do know, aquiring wallace is looking like a really bad deal right now. i think he is lazy and doesn’t care about anything but himself.
I know I'm in the minority on this...
but I still believe this team can get back to how they were during the first 30 games. This time last year, everyone was clamoring that we didn’t have anybody to spell PP when we let Posey go. This team really went down hill when Marquis went out and he’s still easing his way back into his rightful place in the rotation. I still like the trade that sends BBD to the Cats for DJ; backup point is a huge weakness for us right now. Everyone keeps throwing out names of scorers (Noc, Amare) but our problems are with inside toughness other than Perk. We are getting killed night in and night out on the boards and are no where near where we were in 08 defensively. A lot of that has to do with KGs mobility, or lack thereof. If we make a move, I’d like to see us obviously get a replacement shooter for RA and an inside presence. We have enough offensive talent to fill it up as-is. The Butler/Jamison trade was intriguing but, realistically, that is a TON of salary to take on. If it didn’t work out, and DA was unable to move them, we’d look back on wasting our best shot at another ring with the Big 3. DA would be wise to not make a move just to make one. Having the base unhappy with him is a small price to pay for the flexibility to compete at a high level this year and in the future.
If Management is Willing To Spend the Money for a Team With a Real Chance...
And I realize that’s a big “if,” I’ve got three possible trades for the Celtics:
1. Stoudemire and Barbosa for Ray Allen, Perkins and House. I can’t believe that Phoenix would turn that down for JJ Hickson.
2. Iguodala, Dalembert and Speights for Ray Allen and Perkins
3. Gerald Wallace, Diaw and Augustin for Ray and Perkins. Substitute Stephen Jackson for Diaw, and I’m perfectly happy, Substitute Rasheed Wallace for Perkins and I’m equally happy.
All of those deals involve a luxury tax hit next year. But you really don’t save money after that, because after 2011, Perkins is going to want his payday, just as Rondo got his this year. And Perkins’ value just went up when he was selected for the national team.
I think this management wants to go really cheap this year because they think there will be a lockout in 2011, and the want to pocket the savings next year AND in the lockout year while pretending that the team is competitive.
And don’t give me that baloney about not being able to defend Dwight Howard without Perkins. You’ve got six fouls from BBD and another 6 from Shelden Williams, and if that doesn’t work you front him. Orlando isn’t going to beat anyone with Dwight Howard’s offense.
Ok
1) I guess. Barbosa doesn’t provide Ray’s length, and Stoudemire’s not known to defend, but offensively, they’re an upgrade without a doubt. Definite a shot in the arm that Jeff refers to this team needing, for sure. Two questions though…who replaces House? : \ And why hasn’t Barbosa played the last few games? Has he been benched, or is he injured? We don’t need more injured guys, you know….
2) Absolutely. Trade away one big, get two back, and that’s on top of Iguodala. I can dig that.
3) I don’t think this is the best idea. First of all, we don’t get a true 5 back. I don’t know if I’d call Stoudemire such, but at least he could serve as one on the Celtics since he’s as tall as Perkins. Secondly, Diaw seems like he gets starter minutes on the Bobcats. Would he be ok with coming off the bench? At least everyone in the 2nd trade suggestion can fill the same roles with the the Celtics as they do with the Sixers.
So yeah, I’d do 2.
Perk...
Celtic brass is under the impression that the fans will torch TD Banknorth if either Perk or Rondo are dealt.
Fouls
Aren’t going to solve the rebounding disaster created with having BBD playing center on Howard. He’d have a field day on the offensive glass. There’s a reason Perk’s name doesn’t come up in trade rumors. Try to name centers better than Perk and you’ll realize why.
Well
Dalembert loses a few pounds to Perkins, but he’s just as tall. That does concern me, though….hopefully Iguodala would make me forget about that.
Still, either way, BBD having to play Howard at center at ANY POINT in the game doesn’t change if Perkins stays. I mean, Dalembert or Amare would start in place of Perkins, right?
You're right...
I was just commenting on the swapping of Diaw for SJax which would not return a big in the third trade proposal.
Keep Perk
He’s got holes in his game, but he’s got grit. He and Rondo are close, he’s a worker and he outplays his pay. That’s how you build an NBA winner.
Perkins the Future?
If he is the future, then it’s bleak.
You pass on Amare Stoudemire because you can’t part with Perkins? Give me a break.
I still agree mostly with the crowd in saying with Perk. I was watching some Amar’e coverage.. It’d be great to have a 6’10 249lb guy who claims the basket with shear “FORCE”… but Amar’e has been shopped before and He is soft on the D.
The argument to bring in Amar’e could be that the Celtics’ playing “defense” is overrated. If the C’s had Amar’e we’d be unstoppable if somehow we could trade our underutilized bench players (without losing Perk). Amar’e is only 28 years old & there would be a rebounding upside.
I really believe in Rondo and some of the younger talent on the Celtics, however there is something to having a power player. We tend to focus on the team aspect of asists while forgetting that this is the same Celtic team that has always been poor in turnovers.
So my dream… yeah, it’d be nice to have more self-sufficient player who could take the ball to the hoop (alone) but to give up Perkins would be too much.
Perkins+ Ray = House for Amare is a no brainer
On twitter.com/espn it is written that other teams have sweetened their offers since learning of the Hickson trade. I guess we are not the only ones who think that ain’t a hell of a lot. Perkins is good, better than Hickson, but Amare is special. He ate Perkins up in Boston. He won’t be stopped with Rondo setting him up.
Not just that everybody. I would get rid of Wallace and House in a blink as well if I could. They are an albatross on this team and no explanation is necessary. I am sure Doc would love to get him out of town together with his mouth. House is a detriment defensively, his three is not what it used to be, and once and for all can we all agree that the second unit suffers tremendously as soon as he has to bring the ball up and run plays. It is just so obvious how much difficulty he has, Then the ball gets stalled, tied up, a bad pass is made.
By the way I would trade Pierce and KG too as soon as something good comes up. Both are showing the signs of older players. One day all fans of the C’s are going to have to face up to this fact. Managenent can be loyal and hang on to them to the bitter end. Wouldn’t that be nice, but really I have already concluded these injuries, etc,, are old age. Pierce when healthy doesn’t move too swiftly anymore. More and more he is a non participator in the offense and hangs back on the three point line where he has time to windup, aim, breathe and hit his threes. He, Kg, Ray and this present group will not beat anyone signifcant come the playoffs. We would be blind to what we have already seen.
amar'e is a great scoring forward
but Perkins is as good a defender as he is a scorer. Amar’e just seems like a bit of a diva to me and why take the guy if it leaves us with a big hole at center? And by the way, he’ll be every bit as stoppable with Rondo setting him up as he is with Steve Nash. Nash gets more out of his teammates than even RR does…
I agree with you that Sheed and House are not working for this team. Both are just so inconsistent and at this point unreliable.
All I can say to your last paragraph is: I’m glad you’re not GM of the team. Trade Pierce because he’s played injured half the season? Do you remember how well he was moving the first half of the year? We haven’t seen him dunk so frequently since his first couple years in the league. He is clearly just hurt – not old – just hurt. The beloved Kobe Bryant is just a year younger than Paul but he has a full year of NBA miles more than PP does. Is Kobe too old? Why do you even like the Celtics, because they wear green? I’m glad Bird never played for another NBA team, and I’m hoping to say the same thing for Pierce some day.
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 15, 2010 6:29 AM EST up reply actions
Watched part of the All-Star Game
and I found it interesting that a table full of former NBA talent and commentators said the Celtics should keep the team intact. I’ll take the comments of professionals over all this “the sky is falling” crap.
Shop Smart! Shop S-Mart!
agreed - I think it's on Doc to change things up with lineups/ strategies
and if anything, let Danny make a trade with a couple of our expiring contracts on the bench…
by milt palacio's shot on Feb 15, 2010 6:31 AM EST up reply actions
Celts need to keep up with Cavs
While I think making a Red-Sox Yankess rivalry comparison to Celts-Cavs obviously go too far and gives way too much credit to a franchise in the Cavs that has accomplished jack squat, there is one point of relevance. A big part of the Red Sox – Yankees rivalry concerns how they conduct their acquisitions of talent with the other team in mind. At times, it is truly a chess game where certain players are brought in for specific matchups or in some cases, to take them off the market so that the other team does not acquire them…The prosepect of Amare going to the Cavs scares the living Sh&^% out of me. Celtics nation can continue to live in denial and chew on the crazy pills that distort so many of the wild discussion on this board about how he wont fit in or will disrupt team chemistry… but the fact is Stouamire is for real and teaming him with Lebron James is not something I want to see.. I think his brand of athletic talent creates a very scary synergy for Cleveland to not only put them over the hump but to make them Laker proof. The Celts should man up and make something happen to counter this if it indeed happens. But even before this, it is my opinion that they need to go after Amare with whatever they have in order to keep him out of Cleveland’s clutches…
Brick's Comments
I like any of Brick’s trade proposals.
Unfortunately, I think this team ownership is starting to watch their pennies.
I’ve said it before that Perk is what he is. He has most likely gotten to his potential. I don’t like his attitude on fouls {too much like Sheed as refs will pick on him} and two fouls will come earlier and earlier.
Spending 12 minutes on the bench in the 1st half doesn’t help this team. Also, he is the Howard free throw category. Howard at least will give you 15- 20 points a night while 8-10 will become Perk’s output. Move him quickly while his value is rising.
I am very concerned with Sheed’s lack of performance at the block. Too many stupid 3 point shots. Coaches and management has got to speak to him about this or we will go the way of Detroit….out in the 1st round.






























