Nuggets End Celtics' Streak
The Denver Nuggets received 49 points, 15 assists, and 8 rebounds from Chauncey Billups and Carmelo Anthony, en route to snapping the Celtics' three-game winning streak, 114-105.
- A horrendous first quarter didn't do the Celtics any favors. The Celtics were down by as many as 19 in the opening frame, before eventually trailing 37-19 heading into the second.
- J.R. Smith buried the Celtics in the second half, scoring 16 of his 19 points. He shot 5-11 from three-point nation, and hit three pivotal ones in the first half of the fourth quarter when Denver pulled away for good.
- Paul Pierce is clearly ailing with his right thumb injury. He shot just 2-10 from the field and finished with just five points. His thumb was visibly bothering him while he was trying to shoot free throws late in the fourth quarter.
- Kevin Garnett looked good once again. Three games in a row is certainly encouraging. 15 points, 5 rebounds, and 2 blocks in this one, and his lift looked much, much better.
- Nice game from Marquis Daniels off the bench. Played admirable defense on Anthony, and shot 7-8 from the field on his way to 15 points.
- The Celtics' three-point shooting was horrendous all afternoon. 2-13 in this one (15.4 percent).
- Ray Allen was once again the potential savior with 25 points on 9-14 shooting. He was teamed with the second unit in the second quarter and brought the Celtics back. He played 43 of the 48 minutes this afternoon.
The Celtics will be back in action Tuesday night at home when they take on the New York Knicks. Nate Robinson should make his Celtics debut in that game. After a disappointing loss like today's, the Celtics will need a shot in the arm, and hopefully Robinson can provide it.
110 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Go away, Paul
After Q1, I thought everybody played a pretty good game, except Paul. Paul Pierce was an offensive BLACK HOLE, absolutely useless, a cancer in the center of the team. I don’t know why he bothered to have ANY part in the offense. He should have focused SOLELY on defense, and left the O to the others. Truly pathetic performances from Paul, for several games now.
Doc… can you not see that? What does it take for you to SIT one of these guys? Or at LEAST… command him to stay out of the offense, completely. What does it take? Because really, it’s practically impossible for anybody to be worse than Paul was today, on offense.
5 points, 2-10 FG, 1-4 FT, 3 TOs. What’s the point, Paul, what is the point? Go away.
Injured thumb, but
When the shots aren’t falling, it’s smart to get the ball to Ray, whose shot certainlyb was…
by nba is the worst on Feb 21, 2010 8:00 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Paul shoulda sat out the last few games.
Doc don’t you have the gut to change the roster?
by friedgreentomatoes on Feb 21, 2010 8:37 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Is it me or do most of our guys look like they don’t even care if we lose?
by farias on Feb 21, 2010 6:18 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Is it me or do most of our guys look like they don’t even care if we lose?
by farias on Feb 21, 2010 6:18 PM EST via mobile reply actions
sheed effect, imo...
doesn’t care about the regular season and thinks they will kick butt in the playoffs…bad attitude.
by jaimsitecom on Feb 22, 2010 12:59 AM EST up reply actions
Could have used Nate for a game like this...
Oh well (this sucks but) time to move on to New York on Tuesday.
missed tonights game
yahoo reporting that nuggts crushed the C’s, doesnt look that way by the boxscore, alas that may not tell everything.
I truly hope another loss is not going to cause another waive of panic here, it is just a regular season loss
agreed
I was very impressed with his defensive effort, but if is shot is going to be that bothered by his thumb, he needs to take a couple games off
On a more personal note, I live out of market and work nights during the week, what the hell do I have to do watch a win? this is getting ridiculous
P2 is the man.
I feel your pain
X-mas was the last C’s win I actually saw. I work 2 full time jobs, so I only get to listen on the radio.
by KG's Knee on Feb 21, 2010 6:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
You can tape the games...
Watch some on ESPN360.com like last nights… And other ways but I’m not allowed to say them here and they’re not the right thing to do.
Given the significance of a hyperextended right thumb on anyone’s shot, I find the criticism of Pierce’s offense today ridiculous, frankly. Maybe he doesn’t take two or three shots, at worst.
And, he contributed greatly on the defensive end.
May well be he needs a couple of games off – but he gets plaudits from me for trying to play with an injury that would destroy anyone’s shot.
Agree with coachbo
While I’d rather see him get some rest and let it heal, I respect the fact that he did go through and play and though his offense was most definitely off, I saw good things from him on the defensive end. Had some nice blocks in the game.
by faithfulcelticfan34 on Feb 21, 2010 7:14 PM EST up reply actions
Ridiculous
If he can’t shoot, why is he taking shots? Gets no credit for doing the wrong thing at the wrong time.
I agree DRJ1
If PP’s thumb bothers him to the point where it hinders his shot, then he should not shoot. I dont respect anyone playing through pain if it means hurting your team by doing so. As much as I hate Kobe, atleast he knows when its time to rest and heal.
The point is not
That Paul had an aweful offensive game as everybody has bad days but that he shouldn’t have called his own shots so often with injuries thumb——we want no Bryant-ness
by friedgreentomatoes on Feb 21, 2010 8:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
We do want intelligent decision making however
If PP is injuried, he should not be playing, period.
Can't win them all.......
Would of had a shot in this game if Pierce did not struggle as he did apparently due to his thumb injury.
Well going 3-1 on this west coast trip was not too bad.
Other positives from the trip are we are finally all for the most part healthy and playing with our main core of roster players,
KG looked alot better and healthier and the bench played and contributed fairly well.
Also I like how during the trip the C’s really (especially Rondo) pushed the tempo in most of the games and got alot of easy fast break points.
I hope they keep that up and getting Nate on board should only help speed up the tempo and continue this fast break trend on offense we have seen lately.
One more note, Gee I wish we had Chris Anderson coming off our bench, as his athleticism and toughness would of been great to have coming off our bench, especially for a man who will only makes 3.6 million a year for the next 5 years.
Was pulling for the c's to acquire Anderson in 08 instead of pj brown
Ended up quite happy with brown, obviously, but I agree, Anderson would be the perfect guy off our bench, with sheed and the 11th hour that is one hell of a big rotation off the bench
by Warrior Spirit on Feb 21, 2010 6:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Absolutely
Danny, the great GM… let Anderson walk right out of the gym. Coulda had him for a song.
Eh, I find it hard to kill DA for that one,
more on the grounds that it seems like a classic “hindsight is 20-20” case than anything else.
Andersen brought a significant amount of off-court personal baggage with him and supposedly did not look especially in his shape in workouts, if I remember the reports at the time correctly.
From everything I’ve watched, read and heard, it seems that he’s made a remarkable turnaround off the court in addition to being an asset on it (and I’d obviously love to ahve him now), but I don’t have much problem with the idea of DA thinking the risk would have been too great for the expected reward at the time.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Feb 21, 2010 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
True, true
…it is hindsight in this case that’s 20-20. Still, a rueful reminder to Danny is not unwarranted.
Except for Q1, a pretty good game
…except for Paul on offense, of course. Overall, I think their focus and intensity is still on track, and things look good. Except Paul. Send him away (at least on O).
would be nice if they win a playoff series against them
by cheekmeister on Feb 21, 2010 6:27 PM EST up reply actions
So, What's the Prognosis Today?
Yesterday everyone was saying, Oh, they can still win a championship. Does everyone feel the same way today?
That first quarter was simply atrocious. The Fourth quarter was almost as bad.
Disappointing loss
It basically cancels out the win at Portland. I was saying all along they need consistency. They needed a statement win today. Without consistency, they’re going nowhere fast.
meh...3rd game in 4 days..out west vs a good team who just lost to the wiz...throw in the Karl thing and a short
bench..not a big deal….
by celticinorlando on Feb 21, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
denver's motivation
Tirico briefly mentioned it toward the end of the game, but the Celtics absolutely annihilated Denver in their own building last year. I was thinking about that the way the Nugs came out in the first. The 3 gms in 4 nights was probably the biggest factor in the Cs lethargic play though.One of the vagaries of an NBA schedule.
One of the lines we will hear today
“It’s only a regular season game, so nothing to get excited about.” Yet, when they won three in a row, regular season games counted. Bottom line to me is that this was a really solid road trip, but there are still many issues, including consistency and the health of Pierce.
Agree it is just a regular season game
But never said any of them were a more important regular season game. People just got to stop panicing at a loss
by Warrior Spirit on Feb 21, 2010 6:54 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
No change
They’re allowed to lose a game occasionally. The focus and intensity and good play was mostly there. Except for Q1. In Q4, Smith went on a rampage. It happens.
So, no change in the sanguine outlook. But… that’s assuming that either (a) Paul comes back from whatever hell he’s in now, or (b) Doc stops allowing him to touch the ball on the offense. One of those two needs to happen.
so-so
but a 3-0 stretch at home would be great.
by cheekmeister on Feb 21, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
Agree on the 1st
But the 4th ended 32-32. The best 2nd half vs a winning team offensively in quite awhile. Too bad the defense that played so well in the 2nd was nowhere to be found in the 4th
by nba is the worst on Feb 21, 2010 8:04 PM EST up reply actions
Pierce
Pierce needs to sit if he’s not healthy. He is badly hurting this team with his play.
by Wicked Messenger on Feb 21, 2010 6:25 PM EST reply actions
i'd seriously consider sitting paul for a game or two
the lift problem is due to his not being allowed to lift weights on his legs until just recently, so that should come back soon. however, it is obvious the thumb is causing him problems gripping the ball. if i were doc, i might sit paul tuesday, start TA or daniels, and give nate some decent run.
None of my buddies will believe me when I warn them
If KG comes back 100%.
Its over.
"Regular season domination means a lot, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's guaranteed to continue in April, May or June."
Yes... but not if the PP cancer continues to grow
…that too has to be fixed.
Cancer? Please.
He’s got thumb, foot, and knee injuries. Playing through it all for two games does not make him a cancer. He can sit a few games and get healthy.
by TheOutletPass on Feb 21, 2010 10:50 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed with both of you
KG’s back. He looked great on that full court press.
Kg gets back to 90% and it's over
Common guys get off the captains back a bit, Ray went thru a slump, kg is just starting to remember his old self after injury. Give the guy some credit for playing injured when his team needs his body out there regardless what his offense is, he d is great. Let the guy heal, I wouldn’t mind seeing him sat a couple games, or coming off the bench for a few.
by Warrior Spirit on Feb 21, 2010 7:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
sit paul until at least the cavs game thursday.
by celticinorlando on Feb 21, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions
Darn
The guys gave effort today, which was a positive, they just played too sloppy at times and Denver is really good at home. Sucks for me I haven’t been able to watch a C’s win since X-mas.
Couple of observations:
1 . Paul is a gamer, no doubt, but he needs to sit for a few games and heal up. Everyone else is getting healthy, so it sure would be a shame if he can’t get healthy himself.
2. Ray is HOT right now and needs to have more plays run for him. I’m not even gonna bother to beat the dead horse we all know I’m talking about in regards to this.
3. KG is really looking good. Nuff’ said.
Point is, we are getting there. Sure the loss hurts, but progress is being made. Pual needs to get healthy, but if he can, and the guys can come together, we still have a good shot at the title.
by KG's Knee on Feb 21, 2010 6:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions
someone should make a Paul’s Thumb account
by cheekmeister on Feb 21, 2010 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
Damn JR Smith
He had a great second half and basically kept us from coming back on his own at some points. Too bad today wasn’t one of his crappy shooting performances. On a better note, KG played great. Loved the blocks. Daniels finally had a complete performance and Sheed was looking comfortable shooting from midrange and posting up. We just caught the Nuggets on a good (well bad for us) shooting day from downtown. Overall I’m not upset about the performance and hopefully we can play a complete game vs the Knicks and go in hot against the Cavs
i don’t feel too bad about the c’s in this game. i don’t know if we could beat the nuggets in a 7 game series but i’m not sure they’d beat us. pp is more thaan hurt- he’s slumping. yes, the thumb is bothering him, but there’s no oomph in his legs as well. he did play some d tho. big cat davis hustled. i don’t know if we ever had the chance at anderson. maybe danny knew in advance mr. tatoo’s heart was in colorado but what if?
Not to be taken seriously
is this Celtic team. And how sad to realize that Garnett was once for a considerable stretch of time the league’ best rebounder.
by Celtsfansince55 on Feb 21, 2010 6:48 PM EST reply actions
Why not?
This team has been wrecked by injuries. When (if you’re optimistic) or If (if you’re pessimistic) this team can still be a force. KG’s knee/calf issues have lost a little of his lift but it was definitely pleasing to see him take some jumpers with confidence, block a few balls, and complete one of those patent alley-oops with Rondo. Let him get a little more healthy and he will be much more improved in the paint.
Whenever I worry about the Celtics, I just remember the 18 losses in a row and I think to myself "This isn't so bad"
I'd prefer a 40 y/o Jordan than
the Paul Pierce we have oncourt today…Just a truly atrocious outing…I just hope he’s got the courage to sit out the NY game and just rest and let his body heal..PLEASE Paul, you are hurting the team more with what you are doin right now!!!
"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."
I'd take his defense at least...
But offensively it was the worst I’ve seen Pierce in recent memory. The thumb/ankle issues have caught up to him. The only reason I think he played significant minutes is due to the bench and we needed all hands on deck. That Pierce is still an improvement of having Scal out there playing.
Whenever I worry about the Celtics, I just remember the 18 losses in a row and I think to myself "This isn't so bad"
Paul just needs to rest
Sit him this week (yes even with Cleveland on Thursday), cuz the thumb was clearly a problem today.
If we were an 80% foul shooting team…..Shooting fouls ia a matter of mechanics and concentration, like putting. You shoot a foul not while being guarded and not so far away from the basket. Most basketball players learned to play while boys; most went to pretty good basketball schools, a lot got grants to play college basketball and now are pros; and you tell me that a 6;10 guy can only score around 50% of his foul shots; and nobody cared ti teach these guys the mechanics (if the problem is mechanics) nor bother to punish them by making them practice hrs after hrs and even benching them for not concentrating? I played a lot of basketball and I play a lot of golf and its the same thing. Its in your head. In golf, you miss easy puts and it costs you; not anyone else. In basketball your whole team loses. We got 2 starters that cant even hit 55% of their foul shots and I havent read anything is being done about that problem. Whats is it? Not important to make foul shots? You dont lose games by missing an inordinate amt. of foulshots? PP has improved this year on his foulshooting; he is even taking the TF shots. Im sure he has worked on it. Why cant Perkins and Rondo? Those 2 drive absolutely nuts, bananas and crazy. And nothing is done, apparently
Foul shots
Yes Rondo and Perkins both need to spend MANY extra hours in the gym shooting foul shots. Perkins especially. He is just miserable from the line. Ray Allen is always in the gym working on his shot and his shot don’t need near enough work as Rondo and Perkins.
by anotherbanner on Feb 23, 2010 5:53 PM EST up reply actions
Hey dont worry he won the 3 point title and played in the all star game.
Pierce looks like he is playing the game wearing lead boots. In addition, he is shooting free throws with 9 fingers and shooting the basketball with his off hand. Looks like the foot,knee and thumb.
Dont know why he was allowed to play on all star weekend or why he is seeing the light of day on the court today. Even scals would play better than that.
Please, Please, somebody in management put him on the bench until he is ready to play. Somebody show some leadership. It is too painful to watch.
Rondo looked timid in first half but strong second half, quis, bbd, kg. Ray, all strong. Pp great d horrible o
by Blackberry33 on Feb 21, 2010 7:51 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Two points that seem to have generated minimal discussion in the comments at most:
The performance at the foul line was horrific (13-for-24, 54.2 percent). But I guess we can credit the C’s for doing an impressive job of free throw defense, holding the Nuggets to just a 62.5 percent mark of their own. Maybe the Nugs heard Rondo’s footsteps behind them at the stripe.
Rondo’s performance at the defensive end was – not for the first time – less than thrilling.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
Don't the Nuggets boast the best free throw defense in the league?
Something to do with the altitude?
Winning 3/4 on the West Coast was impressive.
Three consecutive games of KG looking healthier is very refreshing and encouraging.
What Was So Good About Pierce's Defense?
Carmello toyed with him.
Glenn Davis has got to dunk more.
He’s getting his shot blocked too many times the last few games. He has to go up stong and dunk instead of trying to lay the ball in.
He has to jump that high. Or else he should get out of the way for a Celtics who can.
How many times during this west coast trip alone did he get his shot blocked/
hey Rey
All going well on your end, amigo?
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Feb 22, 2010 12:11 AM EST up reply actions
Pierce not good, Davis superb, Ray excellent, KG getting close
Pierce was not good. Has looked like he lost a step on O for a few weeks and today worse. I guess the thumb. But he does cover Carmelo and Carmelo didn’t get off. So credit where credit is due.
There were a lot of fools on this blog who would have given Davis up for the Nocionis etc of the league. He is an athlete. Not long, but wide, strong hands and strong effort. If you don’t see it you are a loser.
Ray looking good on this trip but was never the problem. KG leaping, blocking, finishing much better, I wish he and Rondo agreed before game that KG was going to go for 30 pts. Because he would get them. Still not really TAKING IT like he could.
We played well enough to beat almost everybody. Denver is good. Andersen was not missed by Danny. Give me a break. He got his 2nd chance from Denver and was very motivated to re-sign there. Warrior Spirit and DRJ1, Andersen was not a surprise to anyone but maybe you. He’s a helluva player, very atypical and he liked Denver. He would hate Boston. Not the fans, but the culture of Boston, the Dan Shaugnessys etc. He wouldn’t make it in Bible Belt Carolina or Memphis either.
At the tail end of a West Coast road trip we didn’t beat one of the best teams in NBA. When do you losers (Brickowski, Vinnie etc) realize the other guys are good too.
Davis....
Loved the offensive rebounds. But he has to be smarter on his shots. Why does he continue shooting straight into the arms of shot blockers, then crying for a foul? Glen, you’re short and you have no jump. They don’t need to foul you to block your shot.
by Fan from VT on Feb 21, 2010 10:10 PM EST up reply actions
I love Glen Davis' effort
But what good are offensive rebounds if the guy is going to go back up, get stuffed, and turn the ball back to the other team? He has got to learn some moves around the hoop or pass the ball back out. More than 30 percent of his shots close to the hoop are blocked. That is just awful.
he seems to lead the league in blocked putbacks..lol. just pass it bbd!
by cheekmeister on Feb 21, 2010 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
If memory serves, Paul was having problems before the thumb
… got injured. The thumb, tho, seems to have magnified his problems.
I suppose, if you’re going to have any remaining problems to solve, getting PP up to speed is not the worst one to have. I think we can feel fairly confident that he’ll get there, probably sooner rather than later.
Pierce's D
Pierce came up with two steals and I think another disruption of a play in the fourth quarter. I’m a little bummed at the (intense) harshing on Pierce, even if he had a bad game with a bad thumb. I did, however, appreciate how Marquis Daniels’ game steadily improved over the course of the game. He looked lost early, came on very strong, then had a bad turnover, then finished well.
It might be helpful to severely cut down Pierce’s minutes, sit him if necessary, but either way increase Daniels’ minutes at the 3 — especially now that Nate’s on the team. That gives us Nate, TAllen and Daniels, then BBD and Rasheed. Not bad. You could even argue giving Shelden Williams back some of BBD’s minutes of Nate’s offense is as good as advertised and Daniels’ scoring increases, so we get more rebounding up front.
Just a thought. But since we’re playing the Knicks, maybe sitting Pierce one game to rest him for the Cavs might help?
the celts looked like a team with some moves but lacked experience together with the uninjured roster. denver had just lost to the wiz and probably had extra motivation.
KG is dunking. so its a win to me.
What's the matter? The CIA got you pusing too many pencil?
by adubson on Feb 21, 2010 10:23 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Rondo
Pierce obviously had a tough game, but man Rondo was brutal on defense. I know his D has been debated, but just by the eyeball test, it seems every opposing point guard gets passed him at will. His lack of D puts so much pressure on the rest of the team to stop penetration. He also had some headscratching passes on fast breaks. Sheed was awful, but at least he went down in the post a few times. Seriously, can we just get Sheldon in there and see what he can do. He can’t score like Sheed but at least he won’t kill us with horrible shot selection and questionable rotations.
There is No reason for Paul Pierce to play against NY
He needs to rest his thumb, knee and foot, Rest up now so that the injuries dont get worse come playoff time.
PP and Rondo
PP is really banged up-he has no lift and can’t beat anyone off the dribble right now. Rondo reverted to some of his old matador D on Billups-he didn’t look like he was really trying to fight off that high pick and billups is too smart and too strong for him. Loved the effort from Davis but he is overmatched by taller shot blockers. True positives from the trip are KG’s progression and Ray’s form-both very positive signs.
by McHaleinthepost on Feb 21, 2010 10:53 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Step back and take a new hold............
Can’t win every game folks, even though we’d like to.
i) Before this West Coast trip, with the way they were playing, we were all worried if they’d win ANY games let alone go 3-1
ii) The players may have been a bit tired, sluggish from the altitude and MENTALLY SATISFIED coming into this game with a 3-0 mark.
iii) They proved to themselves that they still “have it” by beating LA and Portland on back to back nights.Forget that Kobe was out. LA had been unbeaten without Kobe for several games in a row. This was a VERY successful road trip because it told them everything they needed to know:
That they do have it and can beat anyone when they mentally focus on doing the things that got them #17.
iv) Now the challenge is to continue to progress as they have done since the AS break and attend to business at home on Tuesday and especially on Thursday night.
Today’s loss really meant nothing in light of the above points. You’ve got to keep it in the proper perspective. If they continue to improve as they get their health back, this team can make it to the Finals despite their poor record against Atl and Orl over the past two months.
It’s a new game now both physically and mentally. Just my humble observation and opinions.
The case against Paul
… for this game, is that he personally created this loss:
2-10 FG
3 TO
1-4 FT
That’s 11 possessions that came to naught, plus 3/4 missed FTs, as a direct and sole result of Paul’s activity on offense. Expected point total if he had been playing just an NBA-average game, and 75% FT shooting: 13. Cs lost by 9. QED.
No disrespect intended but you really need to move on. The game’s over. Time to take a broader outlook.
RA has played horribly at times and has cost the team games.
KG has played horribly at times and has cost the team games.
RR has played horribly at times and has cost the team games.
The bench has played horribly at times and has cost the team games.
My unsolicited opinion is to try and look at the positives that have come from the team since the AS break and let go of the PP bashing. Take a broader view of where they are now as compared to two weeks ago.
Hopefully that’ll help you through this time of temporary crisis.
If that doesn’t help, post me and we’ll get you something to help you sleep better.
Uh, the game was just over
… and it’s the purpose of this very thread to discuss that game.
And spare me your condescending tone. This is not a crisis. It is a problem. One that needs to be addressed and solved. But thanks for your “unsolicited” opinions.
My apology:
My apology for what you considered a ‘condescending tone’. It was not intended as such.
My last line was intended as a joke since I have the capability of prescription writing and it appeared as though the ghost of PP was going to keep you up all night.
It’s just that you have been ripping PP from the first post of this topic and throughout the content. You made your point, I presented a different perspective, that’s all. End of story.
It just seemed as though you were ‘beating a dead horse’ as “they” say.
No worries.
We’re all entitled to an opinion and we won’t always agree with each other.
No problem
I can see how it might look like “beating a dead horse”… but that game is the subject of this one thread, and I was trying to add specific numbers to the case re Paul, that’s all. All’s well.
It is a mystery to me why he played, and why he took so many shots, if he and Doc both knew, as they now say, that he was injured. The whole story doesn’t quite hang together very well….
Actually, the expected total is higher
From 13 total possession (10 shots + 3 TOs) plus 4 FTs, we could expect 14-15 points, enough to tie or win. (Figure he should make 3/4 FTs, leaving 11-12 points from 13 possession… a fair expectation.)
Wow
Tuff game to watch, especially in the first quarter. I hate watching the Celtics play from behind, but then again with the team we’ve watched the past month and a half Should I be happier seeing them go up by double digits and loose? All game I kept telling myself there gonna come back, and when they tied it up I was ecstatic… Then jr smith started hitting 3s and it was just dowhill
it was great to see Ray allen have another over 20 point game, KG alley-oop, glen Davis’s hustle, marquios score, especially his and 1 layup, and play defense, another big plus was sheed dominating with his post offense. Not looking at any stats I’m pretty sure he had 8 points in the paint, or backing down his defender. 8 points on 5 attempts put a smile on.
Don’t really wanna name the negatives but PP offense was atrocious
by Pmartin60 on Feb 21, 2010 11:55 PM EST via mobile reply actions
PP and RW have became lazy
If PP’s finger is injured that’s not a good reason not to play with enough effort . RW plays too comfort away from the paint, when we need him to play the post. Think about the money they make and not try harder and be more profesionals.
Bad and Great
1. Doc should see when PP is not playing right. He is CLEARLY trying to play through something. I’m not saying sit him for a week, but, spot minutes please. Marquis can easily take those extra minutes.
2. KG played great. Great great great. I was so happy about KG I didn’t really care about the game.
3. Ray can seriously take it to the rim. I like that he is evolving in the opposite way that most great players do.
4. Rondo keeps disappearing at the end of games. I do not think it is him. I think that the other guys expect that he will defer to them to close out games. I really don’t understand this. When Rondo is at all gears, they are much better.
mostly agree
on point (4) I was actually most frustrated with Rondo early in the game. Several offensive possessions, especially in the first period, when the ball was out of his hands, he just stood off to the side as if he didn’t know what to do. He needs to always be in motion to provide an open outlet for whomever has the ball so it doesn’t get tied up by doubling on the man with the ball – which it did quite often.
When Rondo keeps moving even without the ball, good things tend to happen because on the outside he allows whomever has the ball to restart the play by just getting it out to him and on the inside he is sneaky at getting under the post (KG likes to find him there).
He played much better in the third period, but most of the game was a blah effort on Rondo’s part. Four turnovers, too. Ouch.
agree
You are totally right about yesterdays game. My critique about Rondo is in-general. He’s become my favorite player, so it really is just a critique. I just think, he should get to play his offense. Unlike the other guys, he can basically score at will.
Yup. I guess we take it for granted that he's going to be all over the floor
on offense. So it stuck out like Paul’s sore thumb to see him standing around. Bad games happen.

by 






















