Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NHL Trade Rumors: Do You Make A Move For Rick Nash?

The Ups and Downs of Eddie House

Eddie House's job can be a difficult one at times. 

A traditional role player in today's NBA, House fills a specific niche for the Boston Celtics, and a difficult one at that: shooting. The issues of being a one-dimensional player become apparent mainly when that player suffers through a horrendous slump regarding whatever niche he is expected to fill. In the case of House, he recently stepped out of the month of January having shot just 32.5 percent from three-point nation. Frankly, it's an unacceptable number for a guy like House, who set a Celtics single-season record for three-point field goal percentage last season (44.4 percent from the nation). 

For the season, House has made 57 of his 154 three-point field goal attempts, good for 37 percent, which is a far cry from his 41.2 career percentage from distance. For a pure shooter of House's caliber, his entire season has been something of a slump, or a roller coaster ride with PLENTY of ups and downs, at the very least. The result is a love/hate relationship with many a fan, and he isn't the only Celtic procuring such a bond (See: Wallace, Rasheed).

Star-divide

The difficulty for House is that, because his game is so one-dimensional, when he's not knocking down shots, he's virtually useless to this team. When you look at a player like Paul Pierce, you can forgive him for not scoring 18+ points one game because he'll usually contribute in other areas, whether it be rebounds, assists, steals, or one-on-one defense against the opponent's best perimeter player. Despite House's 6'1 frame and legitimate quickness, he'll never rack up enough assists for us to overlook a poor shooting night (for his career, House boasts a 1.6 assists per game average) and he certainly won't be a force to be reckoned with on defense. 

But the fact is, House has to be better, plain and simple. The Celtics have to receive that spark off the bench that House should be providing, and up until this point, with the exception of a few select games, he has not been able to deliver. 

Fortunately for the Celtics, and House in particular, Marquis Daniels is set to return soon, possibly as early as Sunday. House, having been burdened by second unit ball handling duties, will be able to revert back to his strict role as pure shooter, which should, theoretically, help mold him back into the long distance threat that opposing defenses need to be conscious of. 

If nothing else, Daniels' absence from the second unit has clearly demonstrated that House needs another player to get him the ball, preferably a slasher who will draw in other defenders, thus freeing up House in the corners and along the wings for open shots. Tony Allen, despite being a slasher, is not a drive-and-kick kind of guy. When Tony heads to the basket, he's trying to get to the rim. You might be surprised, with the exception of the occasional dump off down low, how rarely TA kicks the ball back out upon his penetration. So even when Allen played the role of backup point guard, his game actually clashed with House's, which certainly didn't help House rise out of his slump.

Is it a coincidence that House finished with 16 points against the Heat on Wednesday - shooting 5-9 from the field and 2-4 from three-point nation - given that Rajon Rondo, a drive-and-kick kind of guy, played significant minutes with the second unit? On top of that, House played major minutes in the fourth quarter, also alongside Rondo. Now, House might have just been having a solid night, but there's no doubt that his effectiveness was aided by Rondo's presence. 

I wrote the other day about Daniels' return, and I want to add one more thing to that list. If he and House click on offense in the second and fourth quarters when the pine guys get the call, the Celtics could have much better luck maintaining leads, extending leads and erasing deficits. What if the starters head to the bench after the first quarter, with the Celtics up six, and Daniels, House and co. come in and Eddie knocks down two three-pointers. The Celtics' lead could blossom to as many as 12, or remain in the six to 10-point range, depending on what the defense is doing. The point is, that production from House becomes pivotal for the Celtics and actually affects the overall flow of the game. 

If you think back to the Stephon Marbury experiment, what was the one facet of that trial run that worked above all others? His on-the-court chemistry with House. Marbury would drive, see House roam to a corner in his peripherals, and dish him the rock, which House would turn into a three-point basket. House has to have that drive-and-kick player beside him, and Daniels can be that guy. 

Eddie House has to be better than he has been, and hopefully, with the return of Daniels fast approaching, he soon will be.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

we'll see

if Eddie’s performance improves with Quis’ return. If not, Eddie’s fair trade bait.

by slamtheking on Feb 5, 2010 2:06 PM EST reply actions  

Wish there were stats on House’s shooting % when he shoots 3’s on a catch and shoot and when he shoots off the dribble.

by adubson on Feb 5, 2010 2:08 PM EST reply actions  

he has 2 weakness

1. Shooting while curling around picks.
2. the distance to his defender

he is good if he gets the ball while he is facing the basket and then he pulls up for a shot.
for example a pick and pop has to start low while he pops and get the ball when he is going backward before he shoots.

he is good if his defender is within a certain distance, if he is always too close then he gets in eddies head, if he is left alone then (I think) he thinks too much and take too much time that he misses the shot.

he has been missing those and some more of his good shots this season

by aboubata on Feb 5, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Eddie's #'s will get better.

He’ll go on a run for 10-12 games where he is lighting it up and all of a sudden he’ll be over 40% again. Keep in mind that almost NONE of his shots this year have been wide open. Very on point with not having a driver out there that can draw his man to them and get Eddie a wide open shot.

No matter what Eddie gives it his all every second he is on the floor and I will always defend him for that. He’s not a great defender, but he is a pest and denies the ball more than people see. He’s not a great ballhandler but is a great creator. Seems to make some sepctacular passes here and there. Too bad his ball handling skills don’t match his court vision.

Keep it up Eddie. You’re the man and you’ll hit some very big shots for us this year before it’s all over.

by EJPLAYA on Feb 5, 2010 2:14 PM EST reply actions  

I am actually OK with Eddie House

yes his shooting % is down but I think his hustle is always high and his D isn’t terrible. He ain’t the best and he ain’t worst….. House he is a “middle class home” surrounded by big mansions…….but he keeps his yard clean……and sometimes when he is feeling it….it’s a House Party…..or House-a-Fire.

He has no drama surrounding him that I know of…he comes out and does his job…..he isn’t bringing guns to the locker room or sneaking guns on a plane …..and of course for that type action you should go to the BIg House.

House I hope has found a Home

Is it Soup Yet?

by Master Po on Feb 5, 2010 2:21 PM EST reply actions  

Eddie is Fine.

With a little statistics, it’s clear that there is no strong evidence that Eddie is having a bad season shooting 3s. If we assume that he should be shooting them at a base percentage of 0.412, over 154 attempts he’d expect to make just over 63 of them. The binomial distribution gives a 1-sigma range of 63 +/- 6 = 57 to 69 (Meaning that ~ 70% of the time, he’d have a number of makes in this range). If he had 69/154 in, he’d be shooting 45% and everyone would be talking about what an fantastic season he was having. It’s at the other end and instead people are wondering what’s wrong with him. There is no evidence from the number of 3s to suggest anything is wrong!

By contrast, Ray’s 3 % is low by “2 sigma”—-the evidence that Ray is having an off year is much stronger than for Eddie.

by solb on Feb 5, 2010 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

Yup.

Of course, the odd thing with Ray is that his base FG% is up (down from last year, but up for his career). My guess is that’s a product of him going to the hoop for more layups, especially with all the time others have been injured (Pierce, KG) he’s probably had people playing close to take away the three. Which of course would also contribute to the poor 3pt percentage.

That and tired legs (also a product of all the injuries).

Daniels should help both these guys. Eddie by taking the ball out of his hands and Ray by allowing Ray to play fewer minutes.

by mmmmm on Feb 5, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Ya gotta love the guy

When he’s slumping, you can see it bothers him. There’s no questioning his commitment, his energy, and his zeal. He’ll get it together.

Interesting that, as solb points out, Eddie is still within 1 standard deviation of his mean (average)… as opposed to Ray who’s 2 std devs under. Somebody tell Danny (before he thinks about trading Eddie!)

by DRJ1 on Feb 5, 2010 2:47 PM EST reply actions  

The right point guard will get the most out of House

Marbury would drive, see House roam to a corner in his peripherals, and dish him the rock, which House would turn into a three-point basket. House has to have that drive-and-kick player beside him, and Daniels can be that guy.

Spot on. If there’s one thing we’ve learned about House, it’s that he’s most effective when paired with a point who lets him find his spot away from the ball and work his quick-release magic. Look for House to improve when Marquis returns.

by GreenInNYC on Feb 5, 2010 3:29 PM EST reply actions  

Just curious...

Who was the point guard or set up guy Eddie played with last season in December, January and February when he shot 45%, 49% and 50% from 3 respectively for each month?

I love Eddie, but this just sounds like a recurring excuse for his recurring struggles. Sometimes it’s just about making shots.

by Berkcelt on Feb 5, 2010 4:23 PM EST reply actions  

Nobody special. We didn’t have a true back up pg then either.

by adubson on Feb 5, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Come on guys...

Eddie’s at his 5 year low in almost every statistical category. Last year was a career year, this year is a hude regression.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Feb 5, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Does any else laugh when eddie says ‘we gotta play defense’ in the nba pseudo rap commercial?

by adubson on Feb 5, 2010 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

marbury

I had totally blocked him from my memory… THANKS FOR BRINGING HIM BACK UP.

going to go vomit now

"Take it to the hoop, there's a dance involved." - DJ Tommy

by WillyBeamin on Feb 5, 2010 4:54 PM EST reply actions  

good article though

spot on of course with the *hope that daniels can help house out.

"Take it to the hoop, there's a dance involved." - DJ Tommy

by WillyBeamin on Feb 5, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Eddie

He is a hired gun; you don’t ask him to round up the horses, cook dinner or play point guard, you ask him to shoot.

That’s my two cents anyways.

by Little D on Feb 5, 2010 5:12 PM EST reply actions  

Eddie is like the Sundance Kid. He’s better when he moves.

by Berkcelt on Feb 6, 2010 1:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Eddie has been

despite his nice game the other night been in a season long slump all year.

The thing is if House is not shooting well, since his defense is poor he does not give you much on the floor.

If Danny keeps Ray Allen and does not trade him, it would worry me to have him and House as our shooting guards since both have been so inconsistent shooting from outside this year.

Id prefer Ainge trade House and his valuable 2 plus million expiring contract for another more reliable shooter or sign a shooter via buyout signing.

Steady reliable shooting is a must at the shooting guard position for this team and we can not head into the playoffs with 2 inconsistent shooters that we currently have in House and Allen.

by fordescort on Feb 5, 2010 6:32 PM EST reply actions  

Don't worry ford, one (or both) of them will consistify

con-sis-ti-fy – verb
- to become consistent or more consistent

by DRJ1 on Feb 5, 2010 9:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Who do you have in mind

At 2 million, give me a name that is an upgrade over Eddie. Also, I’ll give you the fact he will never be a shutdown defender, but he is not a bad defender.

by Little D on Feb 6, 2010 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Observations & Questions
Bigstock_shamrock_-__1306880-1_small
PAMPLONA? ILLINOIS
Small
Gasol, Deron, or Have Faith In Rondo?
Small
This Team is Complete Garbage
Small
Frustrations..
Small
Rondo and back to backs
Small
Steve Kerr on Rondo's jump shot: "It gets frustrating for the Celtics"
Small
Debunking The "Build around Rondo" Myth
Small
What's up with Phoenix? Is a trade brewing?
Small
Look to Denver

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi