Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Doc Gives Insight Into Celtics' Struggles

Steve Bulpett of the Herald has some terrific quotes from Doc Rivers, who discussed the current state of the team:

"I think when you have a veteran team there's several pitfalls," Rivers said. "One, you're a veteran team. Two, ‘We'll turn it on.' Well, I don't buy into that. I never have.

"Three, leaning back on your past success. Your past success is no guarantee to future success, and I think this team leans back too far on what they've done. And we've got to get to work on what we're going to do."

"We have to get back to work. We have to get back to that workman's mentality. We have to get back to wanting to be the best defensive team in the NBA. We have to get back to executing better.

"We can't just keep relying on guys coming back off of injury. That has thrown us off a little bit because of lack of practice time and all that, but I think that's become an excuse around here. We're not going to allow that. We can't allow that."

"Right now we're the team that's playing poorly. We need to get back to that team that was 23-5. We were playing terrific basketball. We were playing simple basketball, and we were trusting everything. And right now we're not."

At the very least, it's comforting knowing these problems are not being overlooked by the team. Bulpett also mentions how some of the players have been lining up in Doc's office, hoping to address the problems and work on solutions. This is all good stuff, because it proves that this team realizes that it's facing some serious adversity right now, but that it wants to overcome it.

And the first step to recovery, as they say, is admitting that you have a problem. 

Also: Add Gerry Callahan to the list of guys who thinks Ray Allen should be traded.

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

meh...all I hear is bla, bla, bla...

Rivers always says the right things but rarely have we seen those words actually transform into actions…I wish he would just shut up and let the actions speak…

by thebirdman on Feb 9, 2010 7:38 AM EST reply actions  

The press asks him questions. He has to say something.

Like with Bellichick, it aint’ necessarily gonna tell you anything.

by mmmmm on Feb 9, 2010 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Ha!

Bellichek wouldn’t even give them a response! I love his interviews!

by funkstarrdeluxe on Feb 9, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Everyone unloads on Doc. But at some point, the players themselves have to step up.

What I saw in the Orlando was a coach who was NOT happy with the way his guys were playing. According to the broadcasters, Doc laid into them a bit too. A coach can do all the talking and all the fire-lighting he wants to, but at what point do the players become accountable? When are they supposed to decide to take the words to heart and play hard?

I don’t doubt that Doc says the same things to the players that he does to the media – but the players are seriously lacking passion right now. No intensity, no sense of urgency. They get a lead and expect teams to roll over, but no one is fearing us anymore and are pushing back now.

Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!

by RJ87 on Feb 9, 2010 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Great article by Callahan

He didn’t over explain any points, and he didn’t blame any one person for the overall failures of the team. I especially liked two things he said

“They have no one under the age of 32 who can shoot the ball, and they have no one who is willing to consistently operate out of the low post.”

“That is the very definition of a dysfunctional team. So trading Allen and his expiring contract would screw things up? Is that possible at this point?”

I’m hoping Danny makes a move for an Ellis, Martin, Iggy, etc. No thanks on Hinrich.

by TomHamilton30 on Feb 9, 2010 7:51 AM EST reply actions  

was posting mine just as you were :)

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Feb 9, 2010 7:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I really don't like agreeing with Callahan

but this is a very convincing statement:

We say again: Nine times in the last 45 days the Celtics have had a lead of 10 points or more – and lost. That is the very definition of a dysfunctional team. So trading Allen and his expiring contract would screw things up? Is that possible at this point?

with that said, Gerry stays true to knee-jerk form and pronounces that Ray needs to be traded for “young legs” without offering any suggestions or even parameters describing what the team actually needs

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V

by Jeff Clark on Feb 9, 2010 7:52 AM EST reply actions  

Many here have been making this same statement about the double-digit lead issue

To me it is the clearest sign that this team is not a championship contender.

by vinnie on Feb 9, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Typically useless article by Callahan

Restates the obvious. Trade Ray. What? We need someone to trade him FOR? And someone has to agree to GIVE us something? You mean I have to THINK THIS THROUGH?

by mmmmm on Feb 9, 2010 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh those things don't matter

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Feb 9, 2010 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

What i don't understand...

…is that Doc is so quick to yank a young player who makes a mistake, but he’ll play vets thatt are slacking as much as they want. If the expected intensity is not there, young or old, yank them and let someone who’s playing hard play.

by Fan from VT on Feb 9, 2010 7:57 AM EST reply actions  

Same Old Story

I’m not sure why Doc gets Kudos for stating the obvious. Doesn’t he have some responsibility regarding the play on the court? Or more to the point, doesn’t he take responsibility for the play on the court? He always mentions what the players have to do, but never mentions what he has to do to get the team there.

by amenhotep04 on Feb 9, 2010 8:08 AM EST reply actions  

No

This isn’t college. These are grown men who know what it takes to win but aren’t doing it. Doc, I think, has been brilliant this year (except for his overplaying people sometimes). In my fantasy, I wanted Doc to yank all the starters at the 9-minute mark of the third Sunday, to send a message. But it wouldn’t work. If they players don’t want to play, they won’t play, and we’ll all be pulling our hair out in April (not May, though, because there won’t be one.)

by Ersatz on Feb 9, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

So . . .

you’re saying that the coach of an NBA team has little influence about the play on the court?

by amenhotep04 on Feb 9, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Now The Problem Is That It Is A Veteran Team

Several years ago – when Doc and the celtics were winning one game a month, the problem was all those young guys. Then, Doc’s phrase of the day was that you only win with veterans in this league.

Now, when most of the team is made up of veterans, the problem is that this a veteran team relying on past accomplishments.

The real issue here is that Doc has created the environment where players use injuries as an excuse since practice time is limited. He has not insisted on defense. He does not give younger players a chance. He plays players that dont defend and do not rebound.

Three players that are long and over 7 feet and the celtics are 28/29 of all teams in the league in rebounding. This is coaching that accepts failure.

by jwsbeverly on Feb 9, 2010 8:09 AM EST reply actions  

Does anybody have a dollar?

Because with all these pronouncements by Doc plus that buck, I might be able to buy a cup of coffee.

Thank you.

by DRJ1 on Feb 9, 2010 8:11 AM EST reply actions  

I’ll believe this team gets that there’s a problem when I see them actually try to address it on the court. until then it’s nothing but lip service.

As for the theory that trading Ray will screw up the chemistry—→what chemistry? The same team chemistry that thinks it’s ok to put forth less than a full effort on the court? The same team chemistry that thinks it’s ok to coast in a game so that leads and games are lost? The same team chemistry that can’t focus for a game against a major challenger for the title?

by slamtheking on Feb 9, 2010 8:19 AM EST reply actions  

So you trade a guy that has played every game, the second leading scorer on the team, and is a great team player? A shooter who will find his touch once all these trade rumors about him pass after the deadline? A guy who does his job and in better shape than Sheed and Pierce? I realize his expiring contract is valuable to us this year as a trade chip, but Danny put this team together with the 3-4 year plan, and Ray was part of that plan, knowing that he would make almost 20 million bucks in the last year of his contract. So if he is one of the better players on the team, makes no sense to trade him. He is not the problem. Let his contract expire and sign him for less, which he is willing to do. Make him a 6th man next season. Hell, start Daniels and make him a 6th year now. This team can still win a championship. The 69 Celtics were not expected to win the title, and they gutted out a 7 game series against the Lakers to win the championship. It is far too early to throw in the towel. Who cares about home court in the playoffs? The C’s road record is better than there home record. Get healthy. These guys have won before and will be motivated in April. If we are the 3rd or 4th seed, so be it. If we are healthy, then we will be scary in a 7 game series. Everything is ramped up a notch in the playoffs and these guys are seasoned.

by JPV on Feb 9, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you JPV. Getting rid of Ray is getting rid of ALOT of minutes, whose going to pick up the slack? TA has been playing well, and Daniels is back, but can they play consistently and play well toward the end of the game?

by wisco87 on Feb 9, 2010 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Ditto

All we have to do is to stay healthy and fresh as far as possible to the playoffs. And do something with defensive rebounds. We can’t start panicking now.

by Sebal on Feb 9, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

There is an advantage of being a veteran team

that you actually do not need HCA to win the title. The Celtics can win everywhere with or without HCA. We can worry about lack of effort and focus, no question about that. But I think we have so many proffesional players within the team that eventually they will be able to overcome the problems he have currently. As I said before, we must improve devensive rebounding and I would not mind having somebody to provide it.

by Sebal on Feb 9, 2010 8:42 AM EST reply actions  

...If you Close Out

…they canf win on the road, but not if they squander 10 DD leads. Which they do. Frequently.

by Tenacious D on Feb 9, 2010 9:02 AM EST up reply actions  

totally agree with you (see my post above).

by JPV on Feb 9, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

an asset of doc’s is that he can talk to the press and feed them stories. what i hear very little from doc is what is doc screwing up and what can doc and his coaches do to make the team better. everyone is vulnerable and culpable when a team is losing and has to own his share.

by nazzbo on Feb 9, 2010 8:55 AM EST reply actions  

But

Doc’s not screwing up. His offensive play-calling this year is brilliant. He’s doing what he needs to do: putting his players in a position to win. They are not getting it done.

by Ersatz on Feb 9, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Doc is right -- injuries are not an excuse

Two straight games without Kobe and most of two games without Bynum and the Lakers have beaten both Portland and San Antonio by double digits. The Spurs, who some here have claimed will be a contender in the west, are actually more dead than the Celtics and will definitely be a first or second round out in the playoffs.

by vinnie on Feb 9, 2010 9:18 AM EST reply actions  

Callahan is right on the money

wallace is abysmal. He was supposed to be the key but instead he looks old, slow, fat and unwilling to play in the post. He shoots without hesitation whenever he gets the ball whether he’s open or not , whether it’s a good shot or not and whether he has his feet set or not. He could have been this team’s Bill Walton but instead he’s hte new pervis ellison /mikki Moore.

by Red2 on Feb 9, 2010 9:19 AM EST reply actions  

Wallace is the problem

Isn’t it a big coincidence that Wallace’s Pistons team was also known for thinking they could “turn it on” when necessary, but failing to do so? He needs to go.

by Pete C on Feb 9, 2010 9:20 AM EST reply actions  

I agree with this...

Ray is great, we should hold on to him for as long as we can, Rasheed is the problem, bench him.

by vylan on Feb 9, 2010 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes. Bench him and play a rotatation of BBD and Shelden. At least they will hustle and grab some rebounds. BBD can score a bit too. Benching Wallace will send a signal not only to him but to the others, especially Perk, who will elevate his game. If Wallace does not like it, send him to Maine or cut him. Then get another big by trading Scal and Walker. Those are our trade chips, not Ray. We may not bet an A-list player for them, but we do not need to. Just a servicable big guy who can give us 15 minutes a night. What the hell were the Celtics thinking by signing Wallace?

by JPV on Feb 9, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Best idea ever...

Wallace walks up the court and bombs from beyond the arc, bench him and put in someone who will hustle, rebound and play defense. Losing Ray would send the wrong message, he has more hustle in his old body than half the league.

by vylan on Feb 9, 2010 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I think it's worth a try...

Or Wallace on the injured list… then we won’t have to hear him yell ‘AND ONE!’ every time he touches the ball.

by vylan on Feb 9, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Just what this team needs

another broken down player.

Doc start coaching and stop talking please.

"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said

by Birdbrain on Feb 9, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

dont over react...

Sure we’re 9-12 since xmas but in our 12 losses we have a 10+ point lead in 9 games. That means a few little things go differently and we could be 18-3. I know that’s ridiculous but the point is that its not as dire as everyone is making it seem. Its better to play poorly in jan and feb and pick it up in april than to play well all year and crash in april…

by k.diddy on Feb 9, 2010 10:32 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed

This team has looked great, invincible almost, during stretches in most of those losses. I just don’t get the coasting after that. It’s crazy.

by Ersatz on Feb 9, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Rivers cracks me up

He blames losing a few years back on having a young team….

Now he blames losing on having a veteran team….

Hey Glenn: You’re the common denominator.

by Finkelskyhook on Feb 9, 2010 11:13 AM EST reply actions  

trading ray allen is an over reaction

this team is good ive seen it…we dominated the magic the cavs the lakers and the hawks just not for entire games..trading ray allen is the last thing we need

by threats13 on Feb 9, 2010 11:46 AM EST reply actions  

Doc is right on

The Celtics’ recent struggle is the result of mental letdowns more than age or injuries. Sure they are no young chicks, but there are still a few years of good backetball left in the tanks in most of them. Many mid-30 players can still play at the highest level. Nash just turned 36 and he can still shoot the lights out. Grant Hill, at 35, can still fill the lane in fast breaks and play decent D.

I still have faith in the C. Hopefully they will clean up their acts before it is too late.

by getthat18now on Feb 9, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions  

Doc

Is the problem. Any coach with experience would of made adjustments to the line up or try something new. He is afraid of hurting their feelings. Bench Sheed for those excessive 3’s. Give minutes to other players. Try something new for crying out loud.

By the way, why not use Ray as a 6th man? Earn your pay, Doc.

by Ragetti on Feb 9, 2010 1:06 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

screw Gerry Callahan

never have agreed with the man
Ray as 6th man, rather start Tony (didnt see that one comin)
trade ray ok if he gets bought out for Kev martin, pay a a bunch of cash and a draft pick, dont take on Nocionis contract tho, has to be a way to get the numbers right, 3rd team if they want a big?
trade scal and sheldon for Tyrus Thomas
best 5 man big rotation in the league even if with KG and sheed only at half steam
Martin is at 1st glance the best talent we have seen in these trade rumors, and competent enough to start and gel with our other starters right off the bat
if Ray gets bought out, bring him back for the rest of the season for vets min off the bench with a possible resign in offseason
I am still quite tentative to do this scenario UNLESS it is understood that he gets bought out and we send most of his salary with him, can anyone say tampering?

I still believe in this team and think it is in their heads, a question of motivation GET WITH IT GUYS!! i dont mind resting a bit thru the reg season but it is now time to stop resting and show us what this team can do. I dont mind being the underdog it is great motivation, but do this and we are the favorites or at least the biggest threat

Doc find a way to motivate or do the deal
wow did I just say that!

by Warrior Spirit on Feb 9, 2010 2:50 PM EST reply actions  

Now that my frustration has subsided a bit

I will again say it is in the c’s best interest to only do the deal if Ray is to get bought out and comes back. He is too big a piece of this system and it is too late in the season to start anew with a new player and new system for all, Ray comes back to a 6th man role keeping his legs fresh and can be the 2guard to close out the game
but I would do the scal, Sheldon deal or scal/jr for tyrus in a heartbeat, dfense, athletism and rebounding for non playoff rotation players and it seems they r quite pissed with him anyway

by Warrior Spirit on Feb 10, 2010 12:05 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Rivers is Pacifying the Masses

The Celtics’ problem is that, except for Rondo, TA and Daniels, they are old and slow. The other contenders have younger and much more athletic players: LeBron James, Dwight Howard, Josh Smith, Andrew Bynum… the list goes on.

Ainge traded away all of his high draft picks along with his best young prospects (except Rondo) in order to get Allen and Garnett. The Celtics have no lottery talent under the age of 30.

by Brickowski on Feb 9, 2010 3:26 PM EST reply actions  

Winning a championship is great...

BUT not the reason I watch regular season games, everyone is so focused on championships, and where the team will be in five years.

by vylan on Feb 9, 2010 3:27 PM EST reply actions  

I Like to Watch Good, Fast-Paced Basketball

Unfortunately the Celtics aren’t playing any. The fallacy is that they were playing well when they were 23 and 5. They weren’t. I saw the games. They were beating up on bad teams and (with two exceptions) losing to the good ones.

Rivers is engaged in pure spin control. I would guess they have a somewhat better chance of winning a championsip this year than I have of winning the lottery, but I would put their odds at around 2-3 percent. Teams like the Bulls and Heat have about the same chance.

by Brickowski on Feb 9, 2010 4:08 PM EST reply actions  

True...They were never as good as their record

When their record was 11-4……
They were only 3-3 against winning teams { 5 of those 6 were at home}

If not for Toronto {3-0}…they would be 9-10 against teams with winning records
They have 2 quality wins all season…opening night and Xmas day.

by Title 18 on Feb 9, 2010 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Importance of the 6th Seed
Imagesca5vwn2y_small
Don't Worry
J0382610_small
Danny Ainge will have to trade Bass et al in exchange of . . .
Small
Why it makes no sense to blow this team up
Small
New CBA, contracts, and opt-outs
I_want_to_believe_small
The Reality of Rondo
401462_10150508373640614_580570613_9007645_2082321498_n_small
Time For The Celtics To Rebuild
Small
TRADE IDEA...
Small
Is it possible...
Small
Monta and/or Smith?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi