Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Pointing The Finger (Blame Game)

What else can you say about the Celtics at this point?  Thus far, they have been a big disappointment.  Period.

Even if you take the last two embarrassing losses out, they haven't been performing like we thought they would at the beginning of the year.  Sure, the title isn't won in February.  Yes, there's plenty of time left and the proverbial "anything can happen" still applies.  No, I'm not giving up hope or totally losing faith.

I am, however, fully ready to say that something is broken with the Celtics and if it doesn't get fixed soon, we'll most likely be witnessing the closing of the championship window that we signed up for in 2008.  (If so, no complaints by the way.  That title the first year makes it all worth it.)

So we are left trying to figure out why it is broken.  Can we point to age and injuries, effectively chalking it up to fate and bad luck?  Perhaps partially.  But early 30's is typically the end of a player's prime, not necessarily the end of their career.  And even when the team has been mostly healthy this year, they have underperformed.  Besides, good teams manage to win despite injuries (including last year's team - for a while at least).  So I'm not giving the "wait till they are healthy" free pass anymore.

I'm pulling out the Gilbert Arenas finger pistols and pointing the blame at the people I think are most responsible for the disappointing season (thus far).  In no particular order:

Star-divide

Danny Ainge: I'm a big believer in the fact that the players win basketball games, not coaches.  Therefore, the coach needs to be given the right players to win with.  So while Ainge gets a free pass in terms of job security (for hand delivering Banner 17 to Boston), I think he must share the blame here.  Using a cooking analogy, if the ingredients are good - like in 2008, it is much easier to prepare a great tasting meal.  If the ingredients have become stale or mismatched, it becomes very hard to cook up a winner.

Hindsight is 20/20 so this is not really fair, but looking back it appears that the Sheed signing was a mistake.  (If you like you can review my waffling stances where I was against the trade and then talked myself into it after the fact)  The sad thing is that Sheed could have been a perfect fit.  If only he would play on the blocks more and come into camp in shape and motivated.  However, Ainge should have known that he would not play on the blocks much and that he has been unmotivated for the last several years. Changing addresses, as it turns out, didn't change any of that.

In addition, he failed to get someone to bite on Ray Allen in the offseason.  I wasn't a fan of trading him during the year, but in the offseason we could have gotten pretty good value for him and developed some chemistry with a younger piece or two throughout the year.  He got Rondo locked up, so hats off to him for that.  But so far, he hasn't been able to inject new life into the team.

Doc Rivers: You didn't think he'd get off the hook did ya?  Borrowing the analogy from above, good cooks can take less than ideal ingredients and still come up with something pretty good to eat.  Doc has never been known as a great in-game manager.  He's always relied more on developing a rapport with his players and managing egos.  He got everyone to buy into the Ubuntu script in 2008 and that is one of the big, big reasons why the team was able to win the title.  That Ubuntu movement shielded the team from attacks from the outside and protected them from internal strife.

However, we've begun to see cracks in that shield over the last year or so.  We only hear hints of it, and maybe that's all there is to it, but maybe there's a lot more to it.  There very well might be some chemistry issues that Doc has not been able to manage.  Sometimes that's beyond his control, and it isn't necessarily fair to blame Doc for what the players may or may not be feeling.  But if Doc's forte is getting everyone on the same page and they aren't on the same page, then he can't entirely escape blame either.

The Players: I can't pinpoint any one player that could possibly be to blame for the issues, but they all must share in the blame here.  I'm getting a little tired of hearing about how the team is leading the league in points against.  There is such a thing as timely defense.  If you hold a team to 85 points but can't stop them on the last 3 possessions and end up losing 84 to 85, then what good is your league leading defense?

Of course, that wouldn't be much of an issue if we could score 90 or 95 points and win going away.  The careless turnovers don't help.  Letting the shot clock wind down to single digits and hoisting up a desperation heave has the same effect as a turnover.  Losing the rebounding battle does as well.  We have talented offensive players, but for some reason they aren't getting the job done this year.  The rebounding issue in particular bothers me because we have 3 big men who can and should be able to excel on the boards and they simply haven't done the job.

In general, this team simply has lost the focus, desire, and trust in each other that is necessary to win basketball games.  There is still time.  There is still hope.  But the time for talking about it is long gone.  They have to prove it on the court.  They've failed in too many "statement" games.  They've had too many "eye opening" and "gut punching" losses.  Either they'll figure it out soon, or they'll be headed home early again.  And who knows when the next window will open?

Poll
Who do you think should get the MOST blame?
Danny Ainge
127 votes
Doc Rivers
329 votes
The Players
1390 votes

1846 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 85 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from CelticsBlog

Comments

Display:

You win together, you lose together

That includes us fans. I wouldn’t say that if we didn’t reach the Promised Land two years ago. I think your comments are correctly measured. Building around aging veterans has consequences, ie you can’t re-jigger things as quickly when they get off track. Contracts, veteran egos, lack of speed, injuries all get magnified as W’s become Ls.
When Danny talked about a “3 Year Plan” he didn’t add “Then We’re Screwed” but you don’t when you have a bold “Go for it” action or you’d talk yourself out of it.

So, here we are. I missed the Nets game but it was cathartic for me in that veterans always find ways to win games like that. Lose to the Cavs and a few tweaks and you’re still a threat. Lose to the Nets and you can’t expect to be taken seriously.

So bring on spring training. And, I can’t wait for June 12 – England vs USA World Cup match.
  
As for the Celts. I don’t root for Danny or Doc to be fired, although my faith is higher in Danny than Doc. Danny will figure something out. He’s not Elgin Baylor, Kevin McHale or Isaiah. You are right. The Rasheed deal is not looking too good. He may go into “vet star” mode come the playoffs but then there are the two years after that. And I’m sorry to see Bill Walker go despite the sound argument that they haven’t let any other young stars-in-making get away. We do after all need to get younger.

by Wildblu1 on Mar 1, 2010 6:40 AM EST reply actions  

In Australia, if a team is playing poorly, not getting wins – the Coach is the first person to get the toss!

by specwarop on Mar 1, 2010 7:00 AM EST reply actions  

absolutely agreed with you Jeff (about Sheed)

He tooks away a lot of possessions in the game with his 3point attempts. That hurts a lot! The energy to compensate is not there and Nate will not change that too. Doc should ban this attempts of Sheed! Everybody knows that he is better on the low-post and that should be the focus all night long (how Tommy said it every time) We can live with Ray Ray struggling but not with both of them. Everybody should play his role – Sheed played his role worst of all!!! He just want to be “the man” thats all. Jeff you should make a poll on this, that “Sheed”-Bug should be fixed as soon as possible! _

I asked god and he said: L.A. will lose again next year!! ^_°

by greenmech on Mar 1, 2010 7:03 AM EST reply actions  

You can't fire the whole team

So you fire the coach, I remember that is what Red said when they let Tommy go, I hope it doesn’t come to that because I think Doc is great.

by michael32951 on Mar 1, 2010 7:29 AM EST reply actions  

Chefs

D&D threw the dice on KGs knee. Hence Sheed. Result? A slowed down front court that cant/wont defend, board or post-up. Anyone missing Powe? No help from Filene’s Draft Discounts (Paddy, Sheldon) or Uno-Babs.

All this was evident before the deadline. So why no move? If Last Town Brown was serious about wanting Sheed, DA should have bit. Or done a deal w/ Chicago (TT) or Houston (Landry). The rumors re Iggy-Mart indicate mgt is hung up on guards & wings.

As for Ray coming off the books. Do you see FAs coming here now that the widow is closing?

by Tenacious D on Mar 1, 2010 7:30 AM EST reply actions  

Uno-Babs, huh?

I like it.

-sw

Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.

Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw

by Steve Weinman on Mar 1, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

still over the cap

even with ray coming off the books. no lle either, daniels got it last year. all we have is mle

the few, the proud, the boston celtics

by bleedgreen34 on Mar 1, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Blame Father Time

Our core is old. Sadly, this decline was inevitable. I’m disappointed by our play, but not surprised.

by Ahab3 on Mar 1, 2010 7:31 AM EST reply actions  

Which is why

.. a move should have been attempted to get young legs, especially up front. See “Chefs”

by Tenacious D on Mar 1, 2010 7:53 AM EST up reply actions  

When this team played, they played gread. The problem is, most of the time they failed to show up and expected inferior teams to lose the game on their own. Doesn’t work this way.

by kozlodoev on Mar 1, 2010 8:17 AM EST up reply actions  

There is still time...but, there is no more hope!

Things will only deteriorate between now and their first round elimination.

WALLACE : Once he becomes an ex-Celtic, Wyc & DA will openly admit that Sheed was a “desperation signing”. They knew he was old, unmotivated, lazy, and had a volatile personality. They gambled that he would buy into “Ubuntu”. However, they boldly rolled the dice and gave it a shot in hopes of a title. Although I hated the signing all along, that I can actually respect.

RAY ALLEN : The decision to allow Ray`s contract to simply expire is harder to respect. This was done to “save face”. Had they traded him, and the team still performed poorly, they didn`t want to be criticized for “ruining the chemistry”…even though was no chemistry left to ruin! By keeping him, they took the “safe” approach by saying that he gave them the best chance of winning this year…even though there was no chance!

It will only hamper and delay the rebuilding process.

by Title 18 on Mar 1, 2010 7:32 AM EST reply actions  

Cooks

Docs rotations have been mechanical, seldom a response to game conditions. Subs come in blocks, instead of salting starters and subs. He pulls the hot hand but will sticks with what evidently isnt working (Sheed/Uno-Bab combo) working. Timeouts arenet timely. Does one need to go on?

by Tenacious D on Mar 1, 2010 7:34 AM EST reply actions  

Forgot to mention

Nutty small ball combos, starting with Nate and Rajon (hello—isnt Nate here to rest Rajon, not be the new Eddie House. If that’s how he’s going to be used, Id rather have the old House). Anyway, small ball only works if you have a long athletic big to swat away the penetrations. See “Chefs”

by Tenacious D on Mar 1, 2010 7:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Bottle-washers

KG cant help where he is. Big crack in the foundation. Or Pierce.

The rest. We got Detroit retread Sheed, not Sheed reborn. Perk and Uno-Babs have regressed =? Ray and Eddie (while hear) have/had the yips =? Rondo. Hm. maturity issues? Cant lead old/cranky stubborn vets? Cant mesh his style with old/creaky…?

Whats really sads is that the only movebale piece right now is…Rondo.

by Tenacious D on Mar 1, 2010 7:41 AM EST reply actions  

I blame...

Lester Hudson, J.R. Giddens, and Bill Walker. They were supposed to supplant the current BIG 3 as the new BIG 3. Instead they ended up being complete draft busts.

by KG's Knee on Mar 1, 2010 7:45 AM EST reply actions  

I can't tell if this is a joke

How much of a disappointment those three were as Celtics is debatable.

Expecting picks number 30, 47 and 58 of the 2008 and 2009 (the latter two) drafts to supplant the big three is poor logic, not a reflection of those three picks.

-sw

Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.

Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw

by Steve Weinman on Mar 1, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, it was a joke

Hasn’t the whole season been a joke?

I find the blame game to serve very little purpose. Other than, I suppose, to let us fans vent our frustrations.

by KG's Knee on Mar 1, 2010 3:44 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Under performed?

I have to disagree with your comment that when healthy this team has underperformed. The best health we have had as a unit came at the beginning of the season and we were 23-5 and that is not under performing. Everyone is trying to figure out why this team is playing so poorly, it’s quite simple. They haven’t been healthy all year. Sure, they havent played as hard as we would like but let them get healthy and see how they play.

by C'sFanDan on Mar 1, 2010 7:55 AM EST reply actions  

None of the above

Sheed could be right. Hate to admit it, but it’s possible. Everybody’s all bent out of shape about the regular season… but he says, “So what?” It’s meaningless. HCA is meaningless. And he’s right, it is.

Sheed, and the Celtics, may have decided that it’s time for a new way of thinking about the regular season. At least for the Celtics. They don’t care about their record, and they don’t much care about their seeding in the playoffs. They’re keeping their cards close to the vest. They’re minimizing their risk of injury – especially Sheed (obviously). They’re not letting opposing scouts see their best stuff. And they plan on turning over ALL of their cards in the playoffs, where games actually matter. Nothing wrong with that plan that I can see. I rather like it.

But is that their plan? Or do they just suck? I don’t know. You don’t know. But I don’t see why you are ASSUMING they suck. How do you know it’s not their plan? Listening to Sheed talk lately… it sure SOUNDS like this is their plan. Why assume he’s full of it? Why not assume that… {gasp}… he might just be RIGHT?

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 7:55 AM EST reply actions  

Koan

“is that their plan?”

What is the sound of one straw, grasping.

by Tenacious D on Mar 1, 2010 8:01 AM EST up reply actions  

And how do you know?

We’ll find out soon enough. Meanwhile, we do not know. But what they’ve SAID recently… supports this view. Fans don’t like it, of course… ’where’s the entertainment we’re paying for?’ But that doesn’t make it less so.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 8:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Sheed also said

they’d likely win 70 games this year.

by DrD on Mar 1, 2010 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, he said they "could"

… and yes, he’s a weird dude. But he could still be right about the best way to handle the regular season vs the playoffs.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

The Plan

Their body language on the court seems to be contradicting what they say to the media off the court. Seems like “the plan” is not really the plan. If I know, this can only be an excuse for losing.

Somehow, there is something in me that says that maybe, just maybe, they are really doing “the plan.” I just hope so, because with the way they are playing now, I’m not sure if they will be able to win the championship, not even sure if they will get past the first round if they are against one young, athletic team.

I think it is time for Doc to initiate some closed door meetings with the players.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

Yes, intimidation is one of the keys to domination and victory.

by Marjun Raposon on Mar 1, 2010 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Everybody’s all bent out of shape about the regular season… but he says, "So what?" It’s meaningless. HCA is meaningless. And he’s right, it is.

Because that mindset worked so well when Sheed was with the Pistons. And because we really didn’t need all those at-home game sevens in our championship season.

The bottom line is, everyone in the NBA has skills. Where you win or lose the game is in people’s heads. And while we sent a message early in 2007 that teams shouldn’t bother trying, because they’ll go home with a 20-point loss either way, the only message we’ve sent this season is that everyone can get a piece of us if they want to.

That’s why in 2007-2008 everything came easy and the starters played an inordinate amount of three-quarter and done games… and now everyone takes us down to the line (and often goes home with the win).

by kozlodoev on Mar 1, 2010 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, and my point is

… it all doesn’t matter. Not to this team. Not now, in these meaningless games. Playoffs are a whole different animal, and until we get there, we will not know their true nature or plan.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

“But is that their plan? Or do they just suck? "

If that was their plan then why do they consistently play well for one half and then fall apart as the game goes on. You’d expect them to be consistently mediocre if they were simply in cruise control.

by BouncingBuckeye on Mar 1, 2010 10:45 AM EST up reply actions  

No, not really

They would show you flashes of what they can do, just as they are doing. And they’d win their fair share of games, just as they’re doing. And they’d say the things they’ve been saying lately. It all fits.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

They haven’t been winning their fair share mes since they’ve begun falling apart in the second half of games. In fact, they’ve been under .500 in this 2 month stretch. Their record looks decent because they won consistently and looked fresher before it all unraveled. If I think about the 76 Celtics, that team pretty consistently plowed along winning 2 out of 3 and beating some good teams. It never fell off a cliff.

by BouncingBuckeye on Mar 1, 2010 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Please stop with this "plan" stuff

The only plan I see is for the team to be in denial about the fact that it can no longer be an elite squad due to an aging core of players. The plan idea is beyond ridiculous. However, if it is a plan, could they refund me at least half of my season ticket cost for the fact that they are basically tanking games. Honestly, they are 16-11 at home. Anyone that thinks this is a plan……..

by vinnie on Mar 1, 2010 10:45 AM EST up reply actions  

You're right

..they owe you a refund, if this is their plan. Such a plan is subversive. It’s new. Nobody’s done it before.

But let me be really clear here. I’m not just saying that this “could be” their plan. I’m saying it SHOULD BE their plan. I’m saying 82 games is way, way too many, and only exist to line the pockets of the NBA. And HCA is meaningless fool’s gold. And that a smart team WOULD and SHOULD dial it back once they assure themselves of making the playoffs, especially when it’s full of vets that might otherwise get injured and really do not need all this “practice”. They’d play hard enough to stay reasonably sharp, and win their share of games. But like Sheed, they would avoid high-injury-risk situations like charges, heavy post play, etc.

Now you, as a fan, have the right to complain. But I, as a fan interested ONLY in the championship, and NOT the entertainment value of the 82 games… I support this “plan”, and only hope that it IS a plan. As opposed to the conclusion that they just aren’t good enough.

But there are fans, here and elsewhere, who believe, and want to believe, that the Cs are just not good enough. Seems to me that you’d rather be right about that than have your team do what it needs to do to win the championship. But I do not understand this attitude. Hard to reconcile it with why you bother to follow this team in the first place.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Is the "plan" to do a Muhammad Ali "Rope-A-Dope"?

If so…why have Pierce, Ray, Rondo knock themselves out by playing 35-37 minutes every night?

by Title 18 on Mar 1, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

That is a very valid point

Cruising through the playoffs ala-Spurs way provides less minutes for the starters and the vets, then the coach would give more minutes to the reserves. With the way Doc is overplaying his starters, they are not actually cruising, they are trying to win. What I see is a team playing good in the first half then having a second half collapse. This ain’t cruising, it’s an excuse for losing.

And if ever their cruising, do you think they could just “turn it on” come playoffs time? I think not. Even if this is true, the piling L’s just reduces the team’s swagger. Suddenly they are not scary anymore. If the C’s let the opponents think that they can beat them, then they certainly could.

If they want to be the championship contender that they thought they were, then bring your ‘A’ game whether your opponent are the Lakers or the Nets or any other team out there. Even Michael Jordan and his Bulls didn’t cruise or rest in the regular season even if they know that they can turn it on all together come playoffs time, he brings his ‘A’ game every night, that is why he has 6 rings and considered the GOAT.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

Yes, intimidation is one of the keys to domination and victory.

by Marjun Raposon on Mar 1, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

The Spurs NEVER cruised through the regular season

Please look at their win-loss records during their four championship seasons. Their worst was 58-24 and the Celtics will be well below that by the end of this year, probably losing at least 30 games.

by vinnie on Mar 1, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Good question

I think… actually, I know… that Doc’s head isn’t quite screwed on right. He talks to himself (in public) after most games, muttering about how he’s gotta cut Ray’s minutes, gotta cut Rondo’s minutes, etc. It’s weird, really weird. Can’t explain it.

This plan, if it is a plan, is probably not written down anywhere. If anything, it’s a general direction, a basic outline, as opposed to a specific point-by-point plan.

Also, the existence of the plan does not mean they don’t want to win games. Of course they do. And in the heat of battle… Doc does what he does.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

TIME TO TRADE GARNETT AND GOODBYE DOC

Yes, I thought long and hard about this. For this team to go forward and not fall into and pit holes as we did for 20 years, this team needs to TRADE Garnett at the end of the year and start rebuilding a contender.

Entertaining this thought back and forth makes a lot of sense.

1.) The future of this team is Rondo and Perkins to a degree.
2.) Paul Pierce will retire a Boston Celtic and can lend experience to a new group
3.) With Garnett and Allen off the books, we might be able to bring in some new young fresh legs to Rebound and Run the floor.
4.) K.G has run his course in Boston and now it’s time to start looking in another direction
5.) We can’t be saddled with bad contracts like we did before our Championship. ala Rasheed
6.) Danny and Wyc need to take control of this team and not run it by emotions

And now Doc

1.) Doc’s time has run his course
2.) He doesn’t have the will and desire to coach this team
3.) He has become complacent in his day to day job

Overall, I’m rewatching the End of the Bird Era all over again…. and it’s painful to see !!!!!

by Ancient Red on Mar 1, 2010 8:42 AM EST reply actions  

Last night's game (against the Nets)

Though it was a loss, it provided us a glimpse of how effective or serviceable, to say the least, is Kevin Garnett right now. Give him some time. Maybe come playoff time, he will get his groove back. Maybe. If he fails, we could talk about rebuilding after this season. But I don’t bank on it too much, he is really untradeable right now.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

Yes, intimidation is one of the keys to domination and victory.

by Marjun Raposon on Mar 1, 2010 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Doc can't motivate his team

Is obvious the coach can not motivate the players and the chemistry is gone. If we think we still have time, something important, big has to be made.

by C's fan on Mar 1, 2010 8:43 AM EST reply actions  

jeff- this is ridiculous

pointing fingers?
losers point fingers.
-
we must let father time run his marathon
-
it was just a few short moons ago
that we were all singing the praises of this team
following the all-star break
-
i trust in this team and believe they’ll have a nice playoff run
with a little luck + health and maybe even an addition down the stretch
they can STILL hang banner 18 as constitued
-
rooting is more fun
and more satisfying when you stick with the team
-

Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk

by mcpu40 on Mar 1, 2010 8:44 AM EST reply actions  

Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk

by mcpu40 on Mar 1, 2010 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

call it what you want

rah rah all you want. i’m just not blind. i’m not a better or worse fan because i’ve disagreed with a number of decisions, and i won’t build in excuses.

by ssspence on Mar 1, 2010 9:04 AM EST up reply actions  

all i'm sayin is that -

- there’s a lot of basketball left and
- there’s a lot of talent on this squad and
- there’s still reason to believe
.

Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk

by mcpu40 on Mar 1, 2010 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

13-16 over their last 29

1-8 at home against the best teams in the league. 3-11 against Cleveland, Orlando, Atlanta, Dallas, Denver and the Lakers.12 double-digit leads turned into losses since Christmas. All of these facts say all you need to know about this team. No team in the NBA has “coasted” during the regular season like this then won the finals. And don’t give me the 1969 Celtics, which had Bill Russell, the best big man in the history of the game.

by vinnie on Mar 1, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

The 69 celtics also no real top-notch teams to go through. The Knicks weren’t ready for prime time and the Lakers were a good but not great 55 win team. That said, the Celts still needed a couple of very lucky shots by Nelson and Sam Jones to get it done.

The 76 Celts (who won 54games) also won a championship with a less than stellar team. But they too were lucky with their opposition. In the finals they faced a Suns team which had been 42-40 and (luckily for the Celts) had knocked off the defending champs (Golden State).

This team is going to have to knock off 2 or 3 young powerful teams. They aren’t going to be able to wiggle through on guile and a bit of clutch shooting.

Doing what the 69 team did would be the equivalent maybe of beating Orlando and Dallas and no other good team. It would in fact be doable, but real difficult, for this team. However, that kind of playoff draw doesn;t exist any more. Unfortunately there are too many good basketball players.

by BouncingBuckeye on Mar 1, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Should say “The 69 celtics also had no real top-notch teams to go through”

by BouncingBuckeye on Mar 1, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

1969 : Who was REALLY the better team?

Celtics averaged 111 pts., while allowing 105 {2nd best in league}

Lakers averaged 112 pts., while allowing 108}

by Title 18 on Mar 1, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

That 1969 Lakers team was very poor outside of West + Wilt + Baylor.

If they had had a quality supporting cast they would have won the series handedly.

by Who on Mar 1, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Gotta be realistic though

It’s not always going to be sunny outside. While it’s nice to stay positive, there’s nothing wrong whatsoever with criticizing your team when it’s warranted. It doesn’t make you any less of a fan. And right now, this team deserves to be criticized.

by Greg Payne on Mar 1, 2010 9:02 AM EST up reply actions  

In your opinion

…they deserve to be criticized for not taking the regular season seriously enough. In my opinion, they’re doing the right thing. And so it goes. Truth will out, soon enough.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Just wondering how many games a year you pay to go see

As someone who spends more than $5,000 this year and more than $7,000 moving forward, a plan to not play hard all year is not something I am interested in supporting.

by vinnie on Mar 1, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

You are right in that sentiment

Absolutely right. (And the answer is 0. Too far for me.)

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Blame Father Time

However, I will increasingly blame Ainge and Celtics management if they continue to try to ride a dead horse while attempting to convice the fans that it is still kicking.

by Brickowski on Mar 1, 2010 9:24 AM EST reply actions  

It was the Nets....

Guys, that is a classic trap game. While it is obvious that the Celtics aren’t as dominant as they were 2 years ago, losing to the Nets doesn’t prove anything. They are a scrappy team that would love to knock us off. It was clear the Celtics didn’t get “up” for that game, but who would? The Nets only had 5 wins. That game doesn’t prove anything except that the Nets are staffed with NBA players, who if you don’t take seriously, will beat you.

by funkstarrdeluxe on Mar 1, 2010 9:27 AM EST reply actions  

Look, it is easy for all of us to throw in the towel after that disgusting loss to the Nets. But let’s also be real. We have a very good team. Banged up, somewhat old, but talented. In the playoffs. there are no back to back games. More time for practice and some rest for those who need it. A seven game series also allows us to focus on one opponent. So, if we take it one game at a time in the post-season, and stay healthy, then I think this team will lock in and do well. The rest and the preparation for one opponent is perfect for a team like us that needs the rest and the restoration of focus. It will still be hard to beat us in a 7 game series with Pierce, Allen and KG on the floor 30 minutes a game.

by JPV on Mar 1, 2010 9:46 AM EST reply actions  

Garnett's injury/It's not Sheed

Were we not 23 and 5 before Garnett got hurt? Ever since that injury, this team has suffered.
Sometimes I wonder if Garnett feels he no longer has the right to manage the defense as the leader becuase he can’t perform at his highest level. Without the quarterback the team is less focussed.

by ramana on Mar 1, 2010 9:48 AM EST reply actions  

The bench

I think the only thing shown by this season so far is that the bench is not composed of starters, with the possible exception of Marquis Daniels, who, imo, has played brilliantly. Any other bench player deserves reserve pay, not starter pay. I am extremely disappointed in Glen Davis, who billed himself as a “starter”. I said from the beginning that he was a bench “substitution” for KG last year , not a “replacement”. If he actually could have “replaced” KG we would have gone farther in the playoffs. Now Pierce is injured and KG is still recovering, Ray was worn down by too many minutes and having to carry the team yet again…same with Perk. Rondo might also break down unless Robinson fits in (by breakdown I include mental/emotional as well as physical.

I still feel that we will be fine, but our “deep” bench better start playing like a “deep” bench, with passion and team spirit. Glen, please don’t try to lay up the ball when you are surrounded by taller, more athletic opponents…it seems that “practice is Not making
perfect” and you continually get stuffed and turn the ball over. Learn to pass out to an available teammate. Sheed…you are premier in the paint…get there and get some rebounds. I still haven’t heard a good reason why Williams is not playing. My thought on that is, even if you don’t think he is that good, he is effective…he was playing with Marquis on the second string when we won 18 in a row and I don’t care about his “stats”, I just care about the wins.

by thirstyboots18 on Mar 1, 2010 10:02 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t think the season has been that bad.

The start of the year was excellent. The last two months have been tough but that is mostly down to injuries. I still feel very good about the Celtics chances of contending for another title. As long as that’s true, I find it hard to be that disappointed with recent performances.

The main goal (Championship) is still very much in play despite quite a few bumps in the road.

by Who on Mar 1, 2010 10:19 AM EST reply actions  

You guys who still have faith amaze me

And, I give you a lot of credit. After what I have seen since Christmas and what I saw in the last two games, I honestly do not know how anyone can think that this team has a shot at the championship. I look at what the Lakers have done minus Gasol (he missed 17 games), and going 4-0 with Kobe out of the lineup. They still have the second best record in the NBA.

by vinnie on Mar 1, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Was last season this much of a disappointment for you?

by Who on Mar 1, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

It was, but for a different reason

Last year was extremely disappointing in the way the Celtics brass lied to the fans about KG and led us on making us think he was going to come back. However, once it was clear KG was done, there was little disappointment in the fact that they lost in the second round. However, they played their hearts out both in the regular season and the playoffs. This year, they are playing as if they don’t care and the quotes from Perk make me even more disappointed in this team. To me, they are a team in denial about the fact that they really can’t do it anymore and simply are not elite.

by vinnie on Mar 1, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

If — big if — the Celtics get healthy and play as well as they possibly can to close the season and finish strongly in the playoffs … Will you care that they underperformed badly for two months in the middle of the regular season?

This incredibly frustrating period won’t matter to me at that stage. Even if they lose or if they’re not good enough to win a title. It was ugly and hard to watch but so long as they haven’t wasted their opportunity for a title, I’ll be able to make my peace with it.

Now, obviously, if they finish the season performing as they have been recently … I’ll be very disappointed. That will difficult to stomach. A horrid way to end such an enjoyable two year run.

by Who on Mar 1, 2010 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Faith

I would rather hope for the best than hang around moping and expecting the worst. You don’t know what tomorrow brings. Today on NBAtv they reported that Shaq is out for the remainder of the year with a THUMB injury!

by thirstyboots18 on Mar 1, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Lucky Cavs

But the good news, for us, is that he should make it back for the playoffs. Whew!

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

The good news for us is that even if he does come back he will not have been playing in rotation and will not be in game shape. Shaq will always be Shaq, but his team will have to get used to him all over again. Can’t hurt us that he has to take a break.

I want OUR first team to get a little quality time playing together before the playoffs. It really hasn’t happened yet this season….

by thirstyboots18 on Mar 1, 2010 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

The presence of Shaq on the Cavs

…and actively playing is always good for the Cs. He’s supposedly their Dwight-killer, but in fact, he’s their team and speed-killer. We should hope he makes it back for the playoffs, because Brown apparently doesn’t understand any of this.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Interestingly,

the Cavs are ranked exactly where they were a season ago in pace (25th), and they’re actually playing at a couple more possessions per game than they did last year.

That’s not necessarily a reflection of constancy in what you conceive as their “team speed,” but I do think it’s intriguing that their pace hasn’t dropped at all this season.

-sw

Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.

Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw

by Steve Weinman on Mar 1, 2010 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Shaq = Z

… with regard to speed. Hence, not much change. So long as one of them is working, we’re good. But I prefer Shaq, because he also lacks the 3 and FTs. So I root for him to get really, really healthy.

by DRJ1 on Mar 1, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Doc is to blame as he burned these guys out

Over the last three years he played these vets many times over 40 minutes a game. Reminds me how KC Jones shortened the careers of Bird and McHale. McHale was playing 40+ minutes on a broken foot!

by Staubach on Mar 1, 2010 10:47 AM EST reply actions  

Doc Rivers is the #1 problem

Deserved or not, he has lost this team. As the article stated, he has never been a great game management coach, relying on creating an emotional bond within the team. Well, that bond has a rift and it is apparent Rivers does not have the epoxy to mend it. Frankly, I don’t think the players are listening to Thibodeau either. It’s time for a change and tomorrow would be a good place to start.

I can’t blame Ainge that much. I would have liked to have seen a deadline deal for Ray Allen but for whatever reason it didn’t happen. Wallace is a problem now, but if you read his quotes in the paper this morning, he’s saving the good stuff for the playoffs. Not to worry. I’m glad he straightened us out on that score.

The buy-out pickings are looking mighty slim so the C’s will have to make do with what they’ve got. To me, that means get a new coach in there and try to get these guys motivated.

by lemonade sky on Mar 1, 2010 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

Wait Till 2012

The smart thing to do at this point is not sign anyone (besides Rondo) past 2012. Let Pierce, KG, Perk expire. Build up cap room for a shot at Melo and others. Then we’re back in business.

by ChiefDK on Mar 1, 2010 11:26 AM EST reply actions  

Here, Here Chief!

The only person that should be signed long term is “Sonic”. Forget Perk and let these other salaries burn out. I’m up for two years of crappy basketball but certainly not 15.

by Steal by Bird on Mar 1, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

OH NO SOME MILLIONAIRES ARE BORED...!

Ok saying that your BORED!! is just another way of saying that they think they’re too good to play hard, yet they really haven’t shown much.

They haven’t earned shit this year!

Just come out and say that you guys have NO HEART OR PASSION TO WIN!!!

by Foleywood on Mar 1, 2010 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

Nice title for your post, Jeff.

Apparently great minds do think alike.

by thenation on Mar 1, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions  

Doc

He’s using the same approach with a very different team. Popovich would have tried Pierce or Allen off the bench.. or something else. Nothing has been mixed up – Doc’s one lever seems to be play the the All Stars more – which works – until it doesn’t.

I’m fine riding KG, Pierce, and Ray – unless its going to cost them come playoff time. I’d rather battle for 55 wins and be feeling 100% at playoff time – then battle for 65 and have the big 3 at 80%. Maybe that’s not the case and all the injuries were flukey and maybe not – I don’t know. I do know that he’s still operating in 2008 mode and it’s not the same team, roster wise, physically, or mentally.

And for everyone getting mad about the “bored” aspect – go read some books about old school Celts – Red was always scheming ways to keep his guys hungry. That’s the nature of the beast.

by Brendan on Mar 1, 2010 2:37 PM EST reply actions  

why for me the vote is Ainge

Danny – 4 issues that I think should have been done differently:
    1 – Rasheed : while we needed to get some length/depth in the middle, we didn’t need an outside shooting, technical machine that I think has been a bad influence on Perk
    2 – Powe : we should have kept him believing he would show the same recovery work ethic he had in the past
    3 – BBD we should have moved. There was interest, and for what we need he just doesn’t get the job done. He is just too soft under the rim or too short not sure which.
    4 – Ray Allen since the previous 3 points went the wrong direction, we should have been moving Ray to make up for the first 3 mistakes. Without those 3 mistakes, we wouldn’t have to think about moving Ray.

(Doc – needs to play deeper on the bench. We get too many people on the bench that don’t get enough regular season minutes to be useful in filling in for the injuries that inevitable come up, as well as at Playoff time.)

by GrizDave on Mar 1, 2010 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
center trade
Small
The Importance of the 6th Seed
Small
Debunking the "Build around Rondo" myth
Imagesca5vwn2y_small
Don't Worry
J0382610_small
Danny Ainge will have to trade Bass et al in exchange of . . .
Small
Why it makes no sense to blow this team up
Small
New CBA, contracts, and opt-outs
I_want_to_believe_small
The Reality of Rondo
401462_10150508373640614_580570613_9007645_2082321498_n_small
Time For The Celtics To Rebuild
Small
TRADE IDEA...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi