Boston, We Have a Problem
Anyone who says that there was no Celtics offense in tonight's loss to the Memphis Grizzlies clearly did not watch close enough. That game was downright offensive from start to finish.
Actually, to call this a game would be a disservice to every member of the Grizzlies. This was an onslaught from the get-go. The Celtics never lead in this game once. With 5:52 left in the first quarter, the Celtics trailed 11-7. That would be the closest they got the rest of the game, as the Grizzlies then went on 16-5 run and lead by 15 at the end of the first quarter. The Celtics never got closer than 14 points behind and trailed by as many as 29 points late in the fourth quarter.
"I think it speaks for itself," said Kevin Garnett who finished with a dismal six points and seven rebounds. "They came in and just totally annihilated us, nothing to it."
Perhaps that is the scariest part about it. There really was nothing to it. The Grizzlies came in and disrobed the Celtics on their home court. Fitting actually, because with the way the team has been performing lately no player deserves to wear that jersey.
Boos from the fans drained out the sound of the halftime buzzer. It was hard to tell if fans were getting out of their seats for halftime, or leaving the game altogether. Unlike Sunday's game against the Wizards, the earlier they got out of there, the luckier they were. With more than nine minutes remaining in the fourth quarter, the remaining victims in the stands decided to head for the exits. If it wasn't for the fact that the arena was 90% empty by the time the game ended, the boos from the fans would have been much louder.
"It pisses me off," said Ray Allen who scored 17 points but went 0-6 from behind the arc. "I want to do the best job that I know how for anybody coming to watch. It's a lot of people's first time in the building. So performance wise you want to do everything you can to show people enjoyment."
"You come out on your home court and get this kind of loss and get booed by your home court," said Paul Pierce on a night where he went a meager 4-8 from the field . "I haven't been on a court where we've been booed; it's been a couple times this year. It's been about five or six years since I've seen that. We're still 17 games over .500. All the fans want is a constant effort night in and night out. I think we got to be more consistent with that regardless if we win or lose."
Consistent effort would be nice, yes. Where's the attitude? The swagger? Have we lost our mojo? And if so, how do we get it back? Can we get it back? Those are a lot of questions, but unfortunately when games like these are over we are left with more questions than after an episode of Lost.
This team has lost its identity, that's for sure. What started out as a team that some actually thought could challenge the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls' 72-10 record has become a team that can, and has, lost to some of the worst teams in the league in convincing fashion. The "having a good road record" argument is weak when you consider the teams they have beaten on the road.
The obvious issue is one that has to do with age. This team is centered around seasoned veterans. While Rajon Rondo and Kendrick Perkins are young, the utilization of their youth is hindered by the style of play that the Celtics implore when grouped with the veterans. That has been apparent all season, and was just as apparent tonight. The average age of the Celtics is 29 years old. No Grizzlies player, aside from Jamaal Tinsley who didn't play tonight, is 29 years old.
"It hurts us when you give them spirit; there's no doubt about that," said Coach Doc Rivers. "We're not going to get any quicker, and you know when you give an athletic team that's skilled- I mean, they're a skilled athletic team- when you give that team confidence, with the way we're constructed, it makes it difficult."
Rasheed Wallace made a puzzling statement after the loss to Memphis.
"We step up more on big games, but on teams where they're struggling or there might be some teams that are not making the playoffs, you know, I think some times we maybe have the tendency to disrespect them a little bit."
Um, what? Which big games is he talking about? Maybe he's talking about the wins over Atlanta this season. Or it could be the big wins at home against the Cavaliers, Magic, and Lakers. As far as disrespecting the non-contenders, that argument holds no water. If anything, teams are coming in here and disrespecting the Celtics.
"There's a lot of teams that haven't been there, Wallace continued. "This team has been there. No matter where we're coming from. Mike from San Antonio, me from Detroit, the guys here who won it already. I think once them big boy shots come we'll be ready."
The author is unknown, but there is a quote that states, "If you are still talking about what you did yesterday, you haven't done much today."
The Celtics can't simply rely on playoff or Finals "experience" to win another championship. It wasn't that experience that got them a ring two seasons ago. It was willingness to do whatever it took to win, by as many points as possible. To say that a lot of teams haven't been there is false. Been where? The playoffs? Last I checked many of the contenders this year were contenders last year- they've been there.
We do have the experience, we do have the skill, but do we have the will? Often times it is the team that wants it more, or needs it more, that takes it. That was evident in 2007-08, but has yet to be seen this season.
All we can do at this point is take them at their word. But if they want to be top dog they'll have to eventually stop barking and actually prove it on the court.
1 recs |
176 comments
|
Comments
Say what?
This Paul Pierce quote rubs me the wrong way:
“I haven’t been on a court where we’ve been booed; it’s been a couple times this year. It’s been about five or six years since I’ve seen that. We’re still 17 games over .500. All the fans want is a constant effort night in and night out. I think we got to be more consistent with that regardless if we win or lose.”
What is he really saying here? What did he mean by they are still 17 games over 500? Is that his way of saying it’s no biggie? Maybe I misunderstood, but it just rubs me the wrong way.
"You're about as useful as a one-legged man at an arse kicking contest." Rowan Atkinson
by The Village Idiot on Mar 11, 2010 12:58 AM EST reply actions
I think what he was saying is that the BOOS were justified. I think he also acknowledges that fans only expect consistent effort on the court (irrespective of the result) and that they shouldn’t need the fans(and the boos) to remind them to play consistently.
by barefacedmonk on Mar 11, 2010 1:12 AM EST up reply actions
Weak east makes the 17 games over .500 deceptive
When reviewing the record vs teams with winning records, it is obvious that overall won-loss record is meaningless
by nba is the worst on Mar 11, 2010 8:39 AM EST up reply actions
Nice post Jimmy
But one piece strikes me as off.
This team hasn’t lost its identity. It has an identity. A pretty clear one, in fact.
It’s just not the one we hoped for.
But after 60 games, what is…. is.
Can I just say...
…that focusing on Rasheed Wallace’s comments is a waste of time? (Unless your goal is to analyze Sheed, of course.) Sheed speaks for Sheed, and no one else. We didn’t hear those kinds of things from KG or Paul, and I doubt we ever will.
The boos are uncool.
These guys won us a championship.
Paul Pierce always went bananas saving games.
And he gets booed ??
come on Boston. where’s the love.
he is right they are 17 games over .500
imagine if every team at that rate or less got booed at a sporting event.
Booing this team is wrong.
Paul is right.
i think fans have a right to be upset at the product put out on the floor
winning a championship doesnt give you a pass for the rest of your career. the boos are justified. When you lose to a team like memphis that bad at home youre going to hear it from the fans. that doesnt mean fans dont respect or admire pierce as a boston celtic, just need to let them know they arent happy and wont stand for it. thats what makes boston such a great city to play sports in. players will always be held accountable.
by Jimmy Toscano on Mar 11, 2010 1:23 AM EST up reply actions
They deserved it.
They actually deserved it weeks ago. The crowd’s been lenient with them.
Some public disapproval from their home fans can’t hurt at this point.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 11, 2010 1:25 AM EST up reply actions
I actually am surprised it took them this long to do it.
As much as I am conflicted with my views on the booing tonight, I just need to start seeing some effort and the need, to win these games…
And I'm glad they did boo
Because that’s one thing that might stick in their memories the next time they get inclined to throw in the towel.
I am glad the booed as well
but the grizzlies are a good team. Yes, they are not that good, and it was at home, but to completely write of the grizzlies is a mistake, they have a decent squad and a good young core.
And they played lights out tonight
Incredible… like they couldn’t miss.
No defense will have that effect
9th best team in the west clearly top 5 in the east…
by nba is the worst on Mar 11, 2010 8:37 AM EST up reply actions
When you don't play hard you get boooed!
Larry Bird was a shadow of his former self before he retired. I remember him missing an open dunk in that New York 5 game series we lost. He had that bad back and bone spurs. But I always thought he was giving it all he had every time he was on the court. If these guys aren’t healthy enough to play then they should sit. If they lose, they lose. That’s not the point. These guys looked like they didn’t care at all tonight. At least the bench played hard, not well, not well, but hard. The starters for this team look very disinterested and not like a team. Finley was the best player out there and he’s like 38 years old. He came to play. If fans booed Larry he would’ve owned up to it and called his team out. I hope some on this squad will do the same.
Fans should booo for the no show. If I was there tonight I would be horse from screaming and booing that effort.
This is my team and I root for them ups and downs, but tonight was just a surrender from the get go.
Who cares about Ray Allen’s shots? Perk’s touches? Rondo’s assists? Nobody was rebounding. Everyone on this team used to go to the glass. After this game I have to question these guys commitment to team. I’ll always root for the Celtics but win or lose give me something to root for.
these are men not babies
they don’t need you to scream at them.
If I was there tonight I would be horse from screaming and booing that effort.
LMAO
Had a good laugh at that.
And cry me a river if the Celts don’t like being booed. People are paying good damn money in a terrible recession to watch these games and when the millionaires on the court can’t be bothered to try, how exactly should we react? It’s a huge slap in the face to fans to play like that.
by joebianca on Mar 11, 2010 5:26 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
They need something.
Maybe they need something. If they are men they should step up and stop talking about what they going to do and do it. KG or Ray or PP should be doing the screaming. The other night when PP and KG were screaming at each other we got that win. We toughed it out. Tonight nobody screamed they all just rolled over.
Well they certainly need someone to scream at them...
It might get them off the butts and start playing basketball… Or just retire.
by funkstarrdeluxe on Mar 11, 2010 9:24 AM EST up reply actions
If I would have been there
I probably would have gotten myself thrown out because I would have thrown stuff onto the court.
Honestly, people can talk all they want about age, but there’s a ton of talent on this team. Age doesn’t mean getting blown out at home to Memphis, nor losing to the Nets. Age is the least of this team’s problems.
I’m not sure who I’d keep next year, but I’d be looking at blowing up this team, including the coaching staff. Of course that’s why I’m not a GM.
I’d keep Rondo and Perk and go from there.
This team doesn't have a banner
Neither did last year’s team.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 11, 2010 1:25 AM EST up reply actions
Well, ,,,
The past success or failure of a team should not determined wheither it will be booed or cheered. Their perormance, efforts and hearts should be the determining factors.
If a 10-72 team makes a complete turnaround and wins the title, I bet everyone will cheer them on. You won’t stop cheering because they were miserable before. The opposite applies too.
by getthat18now on Mar 11, 2010 4:14 AM EST up reply actions
In regards to the booing
I’ll just say this, if I was paying my hard-earned dollars during a recession to watch a team that IS capable of winning a championship play without heart, urgency, pride, and desire; you bet your ass I’m booing.
P2 is the man.
The only thing that bothers me is that
the players continue to give us what we want to hear. They say, “We need to work on playing better” or “We have no excuse for playing so bad” or " We’ve gotten bored". But then they go out on the court and don’t improve. And I REALLY want to know what is stopping them?
I can see that this is really bothering them, and hurting them, but there’s something that’s making it hard. Is it mentally? Or something going on in the lockerroom that we as fans have no idea what is going on?
I was at the game tonight, and the boos hurt me but also didn’t. I mentioned this b4, but I really wanted them to hear those boos, and also didn’t want them to, in hopes they would hear cheering and then start to play better.
All these excuses and promises are annoying. The will, consistency, the heart, and the WANT in this team has left, and really needs to come back. I don’t like hearing that they’re saving up for playoffs because that doesn’t make sense.
Im so tired of repeating myself, but I continue to talk about this, because I somehow in the back of my head think someone from the inside will see this and find some way to get things really changed.
by Mizzy21390 on Mar 11, 2010 1:35 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
It's called decline
A few good games, a few bad ones.
A good half, a bad quarter.
That’s how it goes. That’s how it’s always gone.
Mind willing, bodies not.
Not much more complicated than that.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 11, 2010 1:41 AM EST up reply actions
If They can't play sit out.
If you can play don’t. I’d rather watch Williams or NATE running hard, working hard, even if they can’t get the job done than someone who can’t play hard out there. Come to play or sit out.
Exactly...
Its kinda like being proud at a group of kids who suck really bad, but they never quit and continue to try their hardest. As opposed to a team of great kids who gave up. NO ONE cheers for the kids who gave up and just stunk it out. THAT usually ends in yelling for not trying.
BUT there are always good things to say to a team of kids who try their hardest and still lose. You can NEVER be mad at a team trying their hardest or having the will and determination, because that shows a strong team that really WANTS to win, though they can’t.
Personally, I would rather enjoy a team of Celtics who try and try and try and try and try, and jump and dive, beat and scream, rebound, grab, PLAY and still lose, than a team that goes out there and lets balls go out of bounds, let the opponet grab rebounds and get second chance points, etc.
They were being held out for a draft pick.
Half the time this season, the core players look like they’re tanking for a draft pick.
by Finkelskyhook on Mar 11, 2010 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
We are playing so bad right now that if we tried to "end it all" it wouldn't be right either

However I am bent ……not yet broken…..
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Mar 11, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
ayy you guys are too cruel
Yes they do have a banner.
it’s theirs not yours.
the majority of this standing team won Celtics #17.
your hard earned dollars CANT BUY a pro basketball team that
wins 80-90% regular season.
lack of respect for the players.
BIG TIME.
fundamentally disagree.
Players don't deserve respect based on 2010
Since when is your boss interested in how well you performed three years ago?
by TheOutletPass on Mar 11, 2010 1:40 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Respect is a big word
I’ve got all sorts of respect for people like our soldiers, volunteers in Haiti and Chile, single mothers, and people who really put themselves out there to help other people. I appreciate the talent of NBA players and I admire when they play with heart.
I am usually optimistic about our team’s prospects, but this was a most dispiriting loss. To me, worse than the loss to the Nets.
by Thruthelookingglass on Mar 11, 2010 7:20 AM EST up reply actions
Not sure why it's worse losing to a far better team
Is it because of the 4 wins against losing teams that followed?
The problems were evident way back with the losses at the Pacers and vs the Suns.
In ’08, the defense was fast, and moved as if they were of one mind. It was uncanny.
That defense is gone…
by nba is the worst on Mar 11, 2010 8:49 AM EST up reply actions
It's our hard earned dollars that pay their salary.
If people pay money to go to games, they have a right to boo if they don’t like the product being displayed. It is us as fans that pay for tickets, gear and watch the advertisements which fund the team. If we aren’t happy with the product we are purchasing it is our job to let management know. Unless you have Wyc’s cell phone number, booing is the only way we can do it.
by funkstarrdeluxe on Mar 11, 2010 9:26 AM EST up reply actions
^my bad, my computer sucks worse than the Celtics...
Anyway, I’ll add that the worst thing about having a team that could be so good suck like this is that it’s not just a funk that they’re in over the course of a few games. They’ve been awful for close to three months now.
I sucked, but I could handle the losing three years ago because the team was young and they were at least trying hard. These guys have way too much experience and make way too much money to allow this to keep happening.
P2 is the man.
too demanding
if I were a player I’d rather play in a cool place
than some place where the fans are never satisfied
unless you win all the time.
You're wound way too tight about this.
These are pros making millions of dollars. They can handle the odd bit of booing amidst all the cheering they get year after year.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 11, 2010 1:50 AM EST up reply actions
It's not the winning....
Ted Williams never won but he brought it every time he played. It’s not the lose it’s the surrender. They can win them all but they should show up for them all.
Its not about winning all the time. Maybe for some it is, but for the majority of us, I think its the lack of effort that is frustrating. Example, and this is speaking for myself, I’m 23, I’ve rooted for this team through thick and think. Watched A LOT of bad teams but I still cared.
My problem with this team is what I stated a few comments ago. The self pride, The urgency, the desire to win, the intensity, the ego, the swagger; none of it is present with this team. Its actually pretty mind boggling. Not mind boggling that they’re losing because players on decline often dont perform that great. We get that. A whole TEAM that is on decline obviously will go through this as well. But the issue is the lack of fight.
Excluding the Wizards game, if an opponent gets an early lead against these guys, turn it off. Because they’ve shown us time and time again this year that they don’t care.
That’s why we’re mad, and that’s why people at the game should have the right to boo.
P2 is the man.
Think of this way
Hearing your own fans boo you is a dramatic kick in the gut. They will NOT soon forget it. And this team needs that more than it needs anything else.
The 08 team never quit. Even down 24 points to the Lakers, they never quit. This team quits. Ok, it’s the regular season, I get that (probably more than anybody.) But this attitude has to be addressed. They can’t walk out thinking the fans are fine with them, even when they give up after a quarter. Knowing how the fans feel is an important thing for them… Being embarrassed by their own fans is important. These things will help prevent this kind of performance from ever happening again. At least, that’s the hope. Without this kick in the gut… there would be that much less hope.
Then you probably should play for
the Clippers, Warriors, Knicks. Better yet, join the Nets, no one will boo coz people won’t go to or watch your games anymore.
by getthat18now on Mar 11, 2010 4:35 AM EST up reply actions
the players then would be no more than brats for which most of them... already are (the league in general)
but I would definitely love to see a team that hustles and fights for every possession and even if they would lose by 30 or by 1 just as long as their heart is in the game for the whole 48 minutes then booing is and will never be justified. But considering the amount of talent that the team has and that we all know that they can play smarter basketball than this is what makes me wish that we have a crappy team since having a crappy team would justify the blow out!
Is it time
To offer one or all three of the so-called big three to a contender and see if they might still bring something valuable in return. Or was the problem last night that it’s still only March and more importantly Veal wasn’t activated?
by Celtsfansince55 on Mar 11, 2010 3:38 AM EST reply actions
I don't think this team has "lost its identity"
They know who they are. They are a defense-first team, which thrives on tough, physical play, and on Rondo distributing the ball to their many shooters. Their identity is intact.
It’s the execution that’s shot to hell. And worst of all – their biggest problem – is their lack of motivation to hang tough when the going gets rough. They fold and quit, way too easily.
But there is still a strand of hope, for me, that this failure to hang tough is a symptom due to the fact that we’re in the regular season. I still hope – against hope – that this problem will turn around in the playoffs.
Yes, that strand of hope is fraying, along with my faith in this team. But we must admit… it’s still POSSIBLE for them to turn it all around in the playoffs. There is still hope.
And this kick in the gut they got last night should help. Because this was no ordinary kick. This one HURT, I guarantee that. When your previously-super-loyal fans BOO YOU OFF THE COURT… it has got to hurt. They will not forget this night.
I’m hoping that they take that pain in their gut, and use it — especially when the playoffs arrive. Win or lose… they must never give up like that again.
They got booed in the Nets game too
The mystique is gone. The rest of the teams know to go right at the Celtics, move the ball inside and out, runs the court, and the celts will fold.
They still have games like the Portland road win that can’t be denied, but in the playoffs, they won’t be able to consistently execute at that level.
That’s just how it is.
by nba is the worst on Mar 11, 2010 8:56 AM EST up reply actions
not much
I was at that game. there were only a smattering of boos. they deserved a full chorus of boos in that game but never got it. the crowd was just looking for any sign of life and when the team actually strung a couple of baskets together in the fourth, they were fully behind the team cheering.
can’t believe I shelled out so much money to sit in loge, get ripped off for food and drink and see such a pathetic performance.
Wyc and team need to hear the disapproval of the performance. I doubt the team will be affected by it though. they certainly weren’t based on their response since the Nets game—>turned in an even bigger stinker just several games later and have played completely listless except for the Charlotte game.
by slamtheking on Mar 11, 2010 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
What started out as a team that some actually thought could challenge the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls' 72-10 record
This statement was actually entertained by a human on planet Earth?
"This is not such a bad thing to be: a deep, talented underdog with Finals experience."~Ian Thomsen on the Orlando Magic.
No Worries
It’s still the regular season.
Once the playoffs start, everything will be just fine.
We need a New Lineup...
Sheed for Perks, and Daniels for RayRay or Pierce
Maybe some of you will remember Auerbach warning the players after just having won a flag: " You better enjoy this one now and (or but) remember how you won it cause next year, if ( or when) you lose 3 games in a row (or something like that) you are going to hear the boos from the fans." That warning has come to fruition.
Rondo plays no defense
and it kills the big guys…one guy playing like sh** and not even trying,exposes the other 4…disgusting
Pleasant Evening, Again
After a 50% effort in Milwaukee, we get to watch a 25% effort at home. The key here is the PG position, Rondo palyed like crap in the first quarter did the hang-dog look and we just walked through the 48 minutes. Yes he showed a spark at times, but poor defense, innacurate passing and a lacl of intensity wiped out any effort in the first quarter. My wife and I watched this disaster unfold, slowly at first but when they were ten down we both knew what the game was going to look like. If KG is still hurt, sit him down. What is his 26% effort going to do for us? We would be better off if we went back to the lineup we had against Orlando with Big Baby. Pierce too, he is coasting through these games just putting in his time. Tony Allen got limited time for whatever reason. He is another guy who deserves minutes on the floor. I don’t care if we win or lose. If they gave us some effort we might have lost anyway. But I want to see effort even when it isn’t solid. We thought Randolph would kill us, but it was Rudy Gay that cut us deep. Look at the rebounds and the fouls we picked up. How long has it been since we had one guy finish with 3 fouls, and we had less than 30 rebounds? Maybe it was the fact that Doc couldn’t go to his secret weapon, Scal wasn’t there “for matchup reasons” WTF? Since when does a guy get a night off at home because he doesn’t matchup with the other team? When was the last time he did matchup with anybody besides the towel boy? I guess I can’t blame him, he wasn’t there. Doc was though, I think?
I wonder what is a coach’ss responsibility when this debacle is happening? What is Doc supposed to do and is he doing it?
He's the damned general!
He is supposed to inspire effort, identify miss-matches, team weaknesses, and make substitutions as needed to sustain an effort. I didn’t see any of that. When my teams lost by 10 or more it was their fault. When we lost by two it was My fault. In this case it is everybody’s fault. I watch the NJ Nets and I see a team that puts out effort in 75% of the games that they play. They have talent, youth, and a drive to win as many games as they can. That isn’t many, but they still give us effort. I enjoy watching that. If they had a real coach, they could be winning 50% of the games that they play. Boston has everything in place, but to run the standard pick & roll, you need 4 guys running without the ball. I can’t tell if Rasheed is on offense or defense half the time. This may have been the worst pick of the decade. But Doc should be reaming these guys out at half-time, reminding them of a job description. They are supposed to come to the floor, ready to play, physically prepared to play and mentally ready. They didn’t look ready last night.
The players "tuned-out" Doc about three months ago...
They are no longer listening to him!
He knows it—-They know it—-and they know that he knows it.
Doc will not be back next year…Boston will buy him out.
The real depressing fact
Is not that that Chris Wallace has put together a team that can demolish us this year. We got the banner that the Big 3 were gambled on to bring us. Just got it in year one.
The real depressing fact is that we don’t have much chance of getting better in the next two years. If I don’t like Andray Blatche etc having their way with KG now, what is it going to look like in two years. At Perk’s regression rate, at Pierce’s loss of foot speed etc.
At least when we were lousy with young guys, hope was eternal. They’ll be a year older next year, we’ll get a good draft pick, we aren’t burdened by salary cap. Now its the opposite. Yikes
2nd round would be a GIFT right now...
Agreed though… No shot at going further… We are looking at Milwaukee, Toronto or Charlotte in the first round (most likely). Toronto is our best bet… Then maybe the team goes to round two.
by funkstarrdeluxe on Mar 11, 2010 9:30 AM EST up reply actions
totally
This team is getting smacked around at the Garden by bad teams. Does anyone really think they can beat any playoff team four times in seven attempts? Trust me, even though Doc refuses to do so, there are plenty of other teams that have coaches who will make adjustments from game to game. As of this moment in time, there are maybe a handful of teams that can’t beat us in a 7 game series; and none of them are playoff bound.
And i’m not being pessimistic because of last night. If you think differently, open your eyes. How many more of these kind of games do you have to watch before you realize we are rooting for a really bad team.
P2 is the man.
best bet?
How can you consider Toronto our best bet? just because we beat them earlier in the year?
Toronto is a very good offensive team—-better than the C’s actually because they have a volume of scorers. The C’s have beaten previously based on defense.
No defense by the C’s will enable Toronto’s scorers to run wild. If Toronto is really our best bet for advancing, we’re screwed.
by slamtheking on Mar 11, 2010 11:13 AM EST up reply actions
Out of the three
Obviously, if we could play the Nets in a 7 game series we’d be all set. However, it is safe to assume that we won’t beat Cleveland or Orlando for the top 2 spots, so we are either in 3 or 4. Which means we would have to play one of those three teams. Milwaukee is playing very solid ball right now, and has emerged as a legitimate team. Charlotte has given us trouble and is becoming more consistent too… So I think the only team that Celtics have done a good job “handling” this season is Toronto. Even then, they will have to play a lot better than they did over the last few games.
by funkstarrdeluxe on Mar 11, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions
One last thought
If a player is not in physical condition to give a full effort for 48 minutes he should not be on the floor for 5 minutes. If KG, PP or anyone else is injured, has stomach problems, sprains or whatever, the coach is responsible to make lineup changes as necessary. If KG is not ready to play 100%, playing him for 24 minutes hurts him more tha it helps. We keep waiting to see the old KG, but he isn’t there anymore. And as far as a good pick next year, that isn’t going to happen. We’ll get in the playoffs which means no lottery. We may have given up a pick for Robinson anyway. We got #57 last year and this year won’t be any better. I thought Rondo was getting too big a contract because he can’t play defense, he has no shot, he goes through wild mood swings (towel over head) but now it looks like he is getting the bad end of the contract.
Not much left to say.....
After last nights game it felt a like a little part of me died last night. Oh well, at least they won a banner. I just figured they might have on more run in them. Guess not. I suppose all that’s left to do now is just sit back and watch it all unfold without any expectation. Who knows maybe I’ll be pleasantly surprised with the outcome.
Dying is better
I had surgery last Thursday and I thought I knew pain. But the pain was worse the last two nights. I think I tore something out last night, lower abdomen is still swollen and I am having trouble in the bathroom. I turned on the TV in the afternoon and they were doing a re-run of the Milwaukee game in NBA League Pass. That was bad, but knowing that last night’s game is there today is much worse. I hope that they take the time to watch themselves. Probably have to be taped to a chair with their eyelids forced open like that scene in Clockwork Orange. I can promise you that it WILL get WORSE. We have a game on Friday night and one on Sunday in Cleveland. When the bookies won’t take a bet on a game because they can’t predict the spread, it is bad and will get worse.
stick a fork in the 2010 celtics
the big 3 are now the pathetic 3. Ray allen actually is the only one of the 3 that gets it .
mother nature caught up with them…thank you for 08.
Dallas came back on its home court last night to beat the Nets. The fact that we could not do that against the Nets on our home court a couple of weeks ago shows that we are not an elite team like Dallas right now. We are a second tier playoff team, much like the Bucks and the Heat. I am one of the more optimistic posters on this site, but last night has really left me deflated. No effort from the starters, we got outrebounded by almost 20 and the young Grizzlies made us really look tired. After last night, why should any of us believe that the Celtics will turn it on in the playoffs? They are saving it for the best teams in the playoffs? We cannot beat above 500 teams now and struggle with below 500 teams. I will root for the Celtics till the end, but this is sad.
The oldest team in the league is Dallas
and they seem to be doing quite alright for themselves. Many are calling them co-favorites with the Lakers and Nuggets to come out of the West. They went out and got the players the Celtics should have gone after by trading Ray Allen – Butler and Haywood. Even with Jason Terry out of the lineup, they are on a serious win streak.
I’ll say it again: Doc Rivers should be fired – Now. His strength is supposed to be motivation rather than x’s and o’s. How motivated has his team looked?
In today’s paper he mentions maybe thinking about some changes in the rotation. They should have addressed that at the trading deadline. There’s not a whole lot he can do now with the roster outside of putting Finley in as 6th man for some scoring – and even an old Finley defends as well as Daniels or Tony Allen.
Perhaps he should try small ball with Pierce at the power forward and only one big – Garnett or whomever deserves to play between the rest. They can’t rebound any worse and just maybe they might be able to stop teams from packing the paint.
Dallas is playing well because they have a bunch of guys who don’t have rings. They’re still hungry.
Agree with just about everything you said except there is no way Finley defends better than Tony Allen. As bad as Rondo has been lately, right now, Tony Allen is the best perimeter defender on the roster.
P2 is the man.
Go Big!
I disagree with the comment that Finley defends as well as Allen. Marquis yes, but TA is very active on defense. Going small right now isn’t a good idea. I think Rasheed, Perkins and Davis down low, Rondo and Allen at the top. Wed have KG and PP come off the bench with Daniels, Finley and Nate No-Legs Robinson. You need two shooters on every lineup or the guard dribbles 20 seconds off and takes that bad 3 like Rondo did several times in the last two games. Worse sttil Davis at the top?
Outlet said it best....
it’s called decline. When did we think this team was going to be a non factor for a title? Next year, In two years? We knew this was going to be the end result when the KG trade was made. We just didn’t want to believe it would come this soon I guess. Have to except this for the next two years, complain or not, until KG’s deal is off our payroll and Ainge can go shopping. Or we can hope that Ainge has a trick up his sleeve within the next two years to acquire some talent to go with Rondo that makes us title relevant again which is probably unlikely. Maybe he would have to move Rondo in a huge deal to acquire the talent necessary to get us back to that level again. Or maybe the best we can hope for is to have Rondo, ala Nash, as the centerpiece on the court whipping the ball around to 3 point shooters like Phoenix does as our nightly entertainment. Lots of questions, few answers. Ainge has some tough decisions ahead of him. It will be fascinating to see his response to this season.
morning ramblin'
The fans have a responsibility to boo. Don’t give me crap about some voodoo-boo immunity gained by winning one championship! People will get after me for the following comment, but if I had the opportunity today, I would take Mayo, Gay, and Randolph for Pierce, Allen, and Garnett. In a heartbeat! Why? Easy…They are young, hungry and are the future of this league. The have the potential to be a next generation big three (potential…) and have been assembled at an age where barring any disruptive trades, injuries, etc, they can actually go on a run together over the span of a decade – much like I expect from a team like the Thunder in the next 5 years…This Celtics team was assembled with each player on the downswing of their career. Luckily 07-08 saw them free from injury and still playing at a very high level and as a result, a championship was won.
Let’s break it down…And nothing I am about to say is new or revolutionary for this board. Perkins is an average center. He makes dumb mistakes down the stretch in big games like silly offensive fouls, illegal screens, and poor passes. He is not a great rebounder. and does not have the lowpost game of a Bogut or Gasol (either bro) or the athleticism of the new NBA center a la Dwight Howard. He labors up and down the court with those heavy, cement legs and is good for 1-2 fast breaks until he needs a breather. When Doc talks about guys letting go defensively when the offensive is not productive, Perkins is culprit numero uno. Perk is the first player on the floor to let his head shut down his body. A move for a new, consistent, heady, scoring and rebounding center is the first move I make in the off season. In my opinion, you build a team from 1 and 5 and then fill in the rest.
KG is not the same player…I dont think anyone will argue that. But, for those of you who say he is getting better and his leg is still improving, I say wake the f871!76k up! I feel like I am taking crazy pills here! Do me a favor…Go to youtube, search his greatest 07-08 plays and pay attention…I swear some people here suffer from major memory loss. That animal has been put out to pasture… He now clearly favors the strong leg – next time he leaves both feet, watch how he lands. He still does not even run right! His inability to move laterally on defense and fight for the ball on the glass is hurting the C’s (too many fans are worshipping at the throne of denial on this one). He is still good for a 18 foot jumpshot and great interior passing but that is about it. He is a shell of his former self. He would be a great backup power forward for a team making a championship run.
Ray Allen can still shoot the ball but he is terribly inconsistent (I know I’m charging through an open door here) and does not play enough of a mid-range game anymore because of the C’s offensive schemes (also because he cannot elevate over more athletic 2 guards off the dribble). I would rather him drop 14 a night every night than go through his extreme swings.
Paul Pierce, like KG, is really hurtin’. I dont know if the knee or ankle was alot worse than reported (possible b/c PP is a no-excuse, hardnosed player). His once unstoppable, thrash to the hole, physical offensive game has suffered. He is getting blocked 2-3 times a game and often is losing the ball on his way to the hoop due to less fluidity in his movement and quickness in his feet. Also, and it may just be me, he is not getting the superstar calls anymore (maybe the refs have lost respect). I mean, I watched Rudy Gay last night and his movement reminded me of the old PP (except Gay does not have the upper body strength that made Pierce so difficult to guard). Paul seems more content nowadays setting up outside the three and lazily letting it fly from deep. He has no lift on the jumper and the effortless motion in his shot is not disjointed and heavy. I love Paul and personally, would put him in the all time top 5 Celtics category. However, his time has passed. I wont harp on Rondo b/c I feel he is what the Celts need more of. Youth and athleticism.
Im sorry, but the Celts have not played a full game of tough, grind it our defense since game 6 against the Lakers in 08. They have had flashes here or there but nothing for more than a quarter. They do not move the ball on offensive and give up on the glass. They are out of gas and are in need of a serious injection of life. Danny needs to blow this up and start from scratch…They can be on top again in just a few short years if they start sooner than later…
I hope I am wrong about the KG and PP injuries/age issues and that they will suprise me come playoff time…I just think at this point, it getting a little late and they are running out of time…The Cleveland game on Sunday could be really scary…
Absolutely
100% correct on every point. I couldn’t have said it better!
If the Celtics were sucking JUST because they were old, I’d invoke Simmons’ 5-year rule. Not much you can do about age.
The fact that they suck because they aren’t putting in the effort every night…. that’s unacceptable. If this was any other team in the league, I think I’d detest them right now. The arrogance of this lot is unacceptable.
outrebounded by 20+
I would like us to go out there the next game and make rebounding the number one priority. All emphasis on rebounding on both ends. if you have to stay on offensive end a little longer instead of getting back early to rest until the opponent brings the ball over the line and up to the trey line then so be it.
we get tired out by staying in too long, so doc can help out by rotating earlier like Bucks did last night around the 6 min mark ,we rotated around the 9 1/2 min mark. that extra 3 1/2 minutes of no rebounding effort in order to hold the shorts and rest could have been time for big baby and company to hit the boards with fury.
PUTF
Physically Unable to Perform- that’s where we are right now. The mind says “we’re still a great team” but the body says differently. Pierce and KG currently can not play at the level we need them to play at to win a title. Heck, forget a title, they can’t play at the level we need to win a game period. Ray is the only one of the big three who is close to where he was physically 2 years ago. Our bench is ok but can you blame them for being uninspired if every time they come in the game we’re down 10-15 points? Sooner or later they’re going to lose confidence as well. I’ve been preaching for a while that Doc needs to make changes and it now sounds like he might be doing that. My feeling is he has nothing to lose. I would bench Perk and start wallace. I would also give serious consideration to starting finley, tony allen or Marquis over Pierce. Paul is hurting the team right now with his crappy defense. Last ngiht we did a decent job with our post defense but we let the cat out of the bag with their wing players. Rondo CAN NOT be our leading scorer. If he is then we lose. I also think Doc needs some new plays. His O is way too laborious and it takes way too long for us to get into our plays. Then if we don;t hin the shot it’s one and done because no one is on the glass. I think we need to go to a motion offense where we’re not so hung up on execution. I htink guys are trying too hard and as a result everyone is up tight and they dwell on mistakes instead of the positives. I do think and maintain that DOc has gotten a free pass. Everyone blames it all on age and injuries but I think other teams have figured out our O and our D and Doc hasn’t adjusted. You saw what happened when he turned Nate loose with ONE play from the knicks book. we would have lost that game but for that. yet, instead of running that all the time he’s now trying to make Nate into a pg . Nate is a scorer not a distibutor. He’s wasted out there trying to pass the ball to baby. we need more quickness and better D in our starting unit so let’s mix it up
good observations R2
I agree rebounding has become our most glaring weakness and the offense needs a trimming
But all the posts about missing mojo are also right on
Rasheed Needs to Go
Those comments from Rasheed make me sick. I remember the ‘08 series against the Pistons, Detroit kept talking about "if it aint rough, it ain’t us." Or something like that. relying on the past to convince yourselves you can win in the future is an excuse, it is a crutch. and it wont work. For Rasheed to say they get up for big games, what is he talking about? 1-3 against Orlando. 0-4 against Atlanta. Blown out at home against Cleveland. Wallace is killing this team, not just with his nightly poor play, but it is obvious his attitude of “we will be fine once the game matters,” has infected the entire team. This team would be better of with Shelden playing Rasheed’s minutes (or maybe play the 25-year old Perkins more than 28 minutes a night.).
Go where?
Best case scenario is he agrees to some form of retirement. No one would take him with his salary and years left on his contract.
by funkstarrdeluxe on Mar 11, 2010 9:33 AM EST up reply actions
one more thing about rebounding and i will stop ranting
During football season when you read the boxscores the next morning, i always notice that for the most part, the team that won the rushing game most often won the game.
Even the pass oriented teams like the Colts would win the rushing game with Addai or whoever, but it was mainly overshadowed by Mannings 300+yds,but i digress.
In basketball it seems like just the same can be said about the team that outrebounds their opponent. THe team who wins the rebounding game most often wins the game.
The lakers and cavs both have good rebounders its nice to have odom,gasol and bynum grab 30+rebounds a night like our original big three used to do and then have the guards pitch in like kobe pitches in 6 or 7 boards and then the bench of course helps.
So we need to go out the next game and win the rebounding game at any cost, if they get tired substitute if a couple breakaways happen then so be it,just not to many .etc
Win the rebounding war and the game is the Celtics
Yep, couldn't agree more
Just did a post about this actually. Pretty interesting the discrepancy in rebounding in the losses..
Start Rasheed
Desparate time call for desparate measure. Is is my opinion, that of all the 30+ players, Rasheed is physically the most capable at his position at this point in time. Doc should glue him to the blocks and threaten to fine him for every time he shoots outside of 15 feet. I know people here are getting tired of his attitude, the quotes, and obviously the long range game but you have to admit…when he plays in the post….he looks GOOD! I am convinced that he can give you 16-20 consistently if he plays lowpost ball and gets minutes from Doc. Perk is a bum and Wallace in my mind is the lesser of two evils…If you make any change in lineup you make it there…Doc is not going to touch the other 4 spots…
Doc's not going to do anything different
He just basically said this on the Dennis and Callahan show. It is going to be the same old same old for the rest of the season.
What CAN he do? Start Rasheed, who epitimizes the “regular season doesn’t matter” attitude? Start Nate over Rondo, or Finley over Pierce? Outside of giving more run to the younger guys who seem like they actually want to be on the court (TA and Sheldon and Nate), there isn’t much he can do with the starters.
What CAN he do?
Sheed-Garnett-Pierce-Daniels-Rondo
Perkins-BigBaby-Finley-RayRay-Nate
Thats it!!!
This team is NOT this bad. I agree that loss to me was worse than NJ, Memphis just punched us in the mouth and we didn’t get up.
That said, I don’t see us flipping a switch in the playoffs, a theme all the vets seem to be alluding to. You can’t flip the switch at that age.
I think a big thing lost on this team is KGs intensity. He’s hurt, and when your hurt, your confidence is damaged. How can he yell and get wound up if he can’t even get his legs under him to finish a contested layup? Since arriving here, he’s been the heart of the team, and we’ve got heart trouble. And the sad part is the healthy guys aren’t picking him up. The whole bench had hang dog. Even last year with him out, we COMPETED!
lets see how this plays out. Front runners, you can exit now……….I’m still going to watch every minute (and not boo).
two problems with this team
In 2007-2008, Paul Pierce believed he was the best player in the NBA (rightly or wrongly, it didn’t matter). He no longer believes this. Just believing it is often enough to carrry the team from behind late in games. Sub-conscious stuff, you see…
Also, the 2009-2010 team lives and dies with Rondo. He simply can’t carry an NBA team on his back night-in-and-night-out…maybe he will be able to next year…maybe not. But right now, Rondo is our franchise. This was established in the playoffs last year against Orlando…and it hasn’t changed since. He needs another player who believes he is the best in the NBA to get the ball to and then the Celtics will win again.
Rondo first needs to understand that defense is more than just steals
it’s staying in front of your man. Just because the opposing team set a pick doesn’t give you the go signal to give up on the play and lose your man.
I agree
Rondo has a habit of getting beat off the dribble at the top of the key. One of the bigs then have to step up which leaves the hole open.
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
Rondo is playing iversonesque defense.
by Finkelskyhook on Mar 11, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions
Couldn’t agree more. He is great at playing the passing lanes with his long arms just like AI. But yu can beat him going to the hole all day.
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions
i will say
KG needs to take a step in, firing up too many shots from ‘just’ inside the 3-point mark – and missing -
They need to take ‘higher percentage’ shots
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk
I still believe until last night.
Fact: The Ticket & The Truth aren’t cutting it. Ray is the only of the big 3 showing a pulse.
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 10:14 AM EST reply actions
Celtics
I don’t understand this team. I saw them absolutely whup my Blazers a few weeks ago. They looked like a team to be very scared of in the race to the championship.
What in the heck is going on?
Pierce and Ray are always talking about ball movement and how the "ball can't stick"
Ray had only three shots two nights ago (Rondo had 10). Pierce had eight last night, (Rondo had 15). I realize that Rondo shoots a high fg%, but still I don’t like the idea of him taking 15 shots a night.
Definitely get the impression that the “ball can’t stick” quotes are directed at Rondo, and they should be. The offense is stagnant right now on this team and Rondo is the general out there on the court.
celtics suck
we need to move the ball more as soon as it gets tp pierce the ball stops moving and he try take over he sucks lets give the ball to allen or garnett
pierce needs to go
trade pierce at the end of the season an sign david lee at least he rebounds
Plain and simple they are just not that good anymore.
They need to just admit to themselves. This thing is over. 3 year window shut.
Time to blow it up. Thanks for the magical season of 2007.
Amen
This team is too talented to be playing so inconsistently! Not to mention that some of their “issues” should be handled by the coach having the cojones to hold players like Perk accountable. The Bucks game was brutal because the bench barely played in the 2nd half. Knowing you had a back to back the bench has to play vs the Bucks! Then the starters laid an egg vs the Grizzlies and the bench minutes were low again. Doc has never been a good rotation coach. He is or should I say WAS a motivator. I said 2 years ago he might be the worst coach to win a ring. Fire him now and send a message to the team. Their play is the play that gets the coach fired. It’s their fault (and Doc’s inabilities to actual coach).
Bench
We have about 20 games to get guys like Nate, Finley, Sheldon, and Sheed ready for the playoffs within the Celtics offense and defense systems. There guys are going to be paramount because the starts just aren’t what they were. Paul and KG have had health issues (they get a pass) Rondo has been good (still isn’t aggressive ALL the time) Ray is only effective when they runs plays for him and his shot is dropping and then there’s Perk. No excuses here! His job is simple: play D, block shots, and rebound! He is NOT a post option on offense and I am so done with his stupid offensive fouls for illegal screens or his T’s because he complains like he belongs on the Kings teams with Adehlman and Divac. I put up with the T’s and offensive fouls when he was handling the other 3 things. Right now he isn’t earning his floor time and Doc won’t man up and put Sheldon out there. Doc’s loyalty is going to get him fired. This team’s window is closing so they better man up and do whatever is needed to win NOW and that includes sitting guys down that are used to playing.
off season
This offseason will NOT be much help because Ainge made the mistake and decided to hang onto Ray’s expiring deal. That was their only chance to drastically change this roster and get younger and better moving forward. They absolutely need Paul to opt out and resign a team friendly extension. If that doesn’t happen then all they can do is bring back their own guys (Nate, Marquis, and Ray) and we all know what that will mean on the court. More of this year. NO ONE is going to want to do a sign and trade for Ray! And who knows if Nate and Marquis will even want to stay here. There is a possibility that this summer has the younger athletic guys leave town and then we are left with the aging guys and no means to help them out with quality younger bench players. Ainge gambled for a banner and it worked but that doesn’t mean the team has to return to the ML Carr years in order to retool.
I disagree. Holding on to Ray’s contract was a smart move. Ray has indicated that he wants to end his career here at a reduced rate. He is a prolific shooter and that gift can never be replaced. He has at least 4 more seasons left at a reduced role and contract. Smart move by Danny & Ray. I think they made a backdoor deal. I wont trade you and Ill stay in Boston at a reduced rate.
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
hmmmm
I really like Ray as a person and will never forget he helped bring home banner #17. The idea of him coming back on the cheap is great in theory. But wouldn’t they have been able to bring him back next year on the cheap AND trade him before the deadline for a younger two guard to help the retooling process? We no longer have a Big 3 with 2 solid supporters. Rondo has improved, Perk has regressed, and the Big 3 have been injured and slowed down. I’m all for loyalty but I also don’t want to go back to the lean years. That drought was brutal!
You just cant replace the greatest 3 ball shooter of all time. He is the perfect floor spacer for our system. And the heck with loyalty, honestly I think Ainge did shop him around. I just don’t think anything worthwhile materialized.
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions
That would have been more difficult.
Even with Ray’s salary gone, the C’s will be over the cap.
Thus the only way they can add a significant player is with the Mid Level Exception (like they used to get Sheed last year).
By keeping Ray, they can also resign him using his Bird rights.
If they had traded Ray, they would have had to use the MLE to bring him back.
Nobody that they were going to get for Ray looked like they were going to provide more help than just keeping Ray for this year OR for the next couple of years, given that the rest of the roster cannot change much until we get KG’s contract off the books.
So it did indeed make most sense to hold on to Ray for now.
The only ‘better’ alternative would have been if we could have traded him for some decent players and then if he got bought out by the receiving team so we could have picked him back up as a mid-season free agent. But no one was willing to make that deal.
The ‘drought’ was caused by more than just the aging and retirement of Bird / McHale / Parrish. The deaths of both Reggie Lewis and Len Bias had probably far far more to do with the team’s troubles at rebuilding.
Just imagine any franchise having to suddenly lose their star player with NO replacement. I.E. where would the Cavs be if (thankfully hypothetically) Lebron had suddenly dropped dead in his first year. Now imagine it happening twice within a relatively short span of years.
This team will not go through the same thing. We will have a tough couple of years to get through that will indeed be held hostage to the health of KG, Pierce and Allen. But we do have some young players upon which to build and when those big contracts come due, we can either trade them as expirings or simply use the huge amounts of cap room ourselves to sign FAs.
Props
You clearly know your Celtics present and past. I agree with some of what you said. The deaths of Bias and Reggie are not measurable because their impact was so enormous then and years that followed.
You mean to tell me that if the Celtics could have sent Ray to the Kings for Martin and Noccioni for the rest of this season and then brought Ray back this summer with the mid level, that wouldn’t be better than what will happen after the offseason moves this summer? Under your scenario, they keep Ray this year to make a short meaningless playoff run and then use the mid level to keep him this summer. What does that do?
For the record, including Bill Walker in the Eddie Nate deal will end up being a mistake on Ainge’s part. Bill can play and just needed court time to develop. This team is NOT that far from having that court time to develop him. He is raw, but was worth drafting and was steal in the 2nd round. To include him to get Nate for part of a year is questionable.
If I were doc rivers I would
Say screw it you don’t want to play, don’t play
my rotation for the Indy game would be Nate, Ray, Quisy, Baby and Sheldon starting with TA, Finley and Scal off the bench. The others don’t even see a minute, though they are on the bench all dressed. Hopefully getting embarassed and pissed.
Regular rotations for the cavs, you have 30 seconds of not playing to capacity and you ride the pine, maybe with a chance to redeem yourself in the 4th. Who cares of the outcome at this point, motivate these guys will ya doc. Personally I think that should be MO for the time being, no effort ride the pine, especially at home.
by Warrior Spirit on Mar 11, 2010 12:04 PM EST via mobile reply actions
And no I haven't lost my faith
But that was lame and I am pissed. And they should be pissed at themselves too. And yes I will say it again I would bench the engine, the fuel and the captain. The whole starting rotation and 6th man minus Ray. They can play better than that. Earn your spots back. Only works if you bench them all, otherwise you risk offending a fragile ego the wrong way, this way you put fire into the whole unit.
If Doc does this he would IMO be among the greatest coaches in history, though I don’t know if he has the foresight or the nutt to do it.
by Warrior Spirit on Mar 11, 2010 12:10 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Doc
Doc isn’t going to do what needs to be done to get the attention of these guys. We all know that. He thinks he is this master motivator and he can “talk” them through this. The time for talk has passed and I think the team has grown tired of Doc’s “talk”. At some point, players tune out the coach and that’s when change is needed. I’m not saying this team is great and built to win a ring this year, however I think they could make a run at it. But Doc is not the man to steer them that way anymore. He did what he was asked to do, but now it is time to make a change. Give Coach T a shot! He deserves it and it would give him 20 plus games and the playoffs to show Ainge and Wyc he deserves a contract to continue. Why not?
Imagine the rage boiling
In those 5 even sheed!
To sit in uniform for a whole game, while lesser players take the court for the whole game. Hell it could even motivate those on the floor to dominate indi defensively and actually win.
by Warrior Spirit on Mar 11, 2010 12:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I don't care if they were down 30 at halftime
Those guys would not see the floor.
I understand this is a moot point, cause doc won’t do it. A total shame. I actually think this could be the best way to change this.
by Warrior Spirit on Mar 11, 2010 12:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I don't care if they were down 30 at halftime
Those guys would not see the floor.
I understand this is a moot point, cause doc won’t do it. A total shame. I actually think this could be the best way to change this.
by Warrior Spirit on Mar 11, 2010 1:04 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
This !!
I have been thinking the same thing for a while now as well. Sure Doc is a motivator but who says he has to be nicey-nice to always motivate his guys? This is a way to motivate the guys as well.
Imagine the embarrassment 4 of the 5 starters will face when they are benched practically the whole game despite being suited for it. More than the boo-ing, the posters outside the locker room……its a technique like this that can actually lit a fire under these guys.
Please let a miracle happen and let Doc get some guts to take some drastic measurements.
Btw my comment was for:
Warrior Spirit (just making sure no confusion happens)
not gonna happen
Doc won’t do that. Ainge just needs to respectfully let Doc go. Thank him for the banner and intimate that a change needs to happen to maximize what this team might be able to accomplish this season and that Coach T deserves a shot so why not now.
But who do you replace him with??? Eddie Jordan?
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
Promotion
I would promote Coach T and give him the rest of the season and the playoffs to earn a contract for the next few years. If that doesn’t work out then I would explore who is available in the off season. Someone quality would want this job. I just don’t want Danny coming down from his office to coach again.
Yikes.
The one game where Tom T. got an extended ‘audition’ as head coach (because Doc got ejected) he basically did a horrrrrible job. He made ZERO substitutions for like 20 minutes and our guys ran out of gas and we lost. Deer in the headlights.
Great defensive assistant coach. Not clear yet he is ready to be a head coach.
???
That sounds like Doc lately, are you sure it wasn’t Doc? Nate and Finely sparked the offense in the first half vs the Bucks and didn’t see any other real action the rest of the game, with a back to back coming, huh? Doc contradicts himself all the time. “I’m going to throw Mike out there and see what he can do.” Uh ok, I’ll score 5 quick points and then sit the rest of the game. “Nate can be our spark plug off the bench.” Uh Nate just go sit the second half after scoring 6-8 points in the first half. C’mon, that can’t be camouflaged.
No, it wast Tom T.
Doc was ejected arguing a flagrant foul call on Davis during a Hawks game earlier this year.
Tom T. proceeded to do a crapola job of game management and we lost.
What about Tomjanovich?
I think he’s a scout for the Lakers right now. I wonder if he has anything left in the tank. I have never been a big Doc fan, and this was way before this debacle of a year.
Doc
Doc is NOT an actual coach! Like I have said for 2 years, he is the worst “coach” to ever win a ring! He is a motivator and manager of egos (our poor man’s Phil Jackson). His X’s and O’s are poor and he has never handled his rotations well. How can the coach of an elite team allow his team to turn the ball over so much for 3 years? Is there a worse elite team running an offense coming out of a time out? Seriously, watch how many times the C’s don’t score after a time out. It’s glaring!
I agree
and I even said it after they won the champioship. There are a lot of NBA coaches that could have won with that lineup. But, of course when I said, they were still winning at the beginning of last season and everyone blasted me on the post I said it on.
This has nothing to do with Doc. There 3 hall of famers on this squad and only one is playing like it. KG and Paul need to be held accountable. Point Blank.
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
clarify please
Which of the 3 hall of famers is playing like one right now? Paul and Kevin aren’t 100% and are showing age. Ray woke up for a few games and was scoring again but a real hall of famer doesn’t settle for 3 shots in a loss. In a time out he asserts himself and makes change happen. Waiting to speak to the media after the game and then having a one on one with Rondo before the Grizzlies game isn’t enough. Ray has to have plays run for him and he cannot create his own offense anymore. He is what he is. But he is NOT playing like a starting 2 guard making $19 million this year.
His salary is based off his past. No arguement from me there. But the backbone of this team was designed with KG being a prolific interior defender and Paul being a prolific scorerer. Andrew Bogut and Marc Gasol looked like Hall of Famers the last two games and paul has only broken 20 points in one of the last five or six games. We simply cant win with them providing this level of production. This team wasn’t designed for us to win with them playing like this. There is no argueing that point.
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
agree 100%
You are dead on about the “big 3”. I’m just fine tuning what you said. None of the 3 are playing like the team needs! The big guys tearing us up is a Perk issue. He has had his head “you know where” for far too long. The older 3 have excuses, what is Perk’s? Hollinger is on ESPN chatting right now and he said Ainge should be kicking himself for not persisting on the Kings deal that would have netting Martin and Noccioni. I agree.
Perk and Rondo are both at least three years away from being at a point where you can rely on them to win this late in the season and in the playoffs. The big 3 own whats going on right now. Don’t belive the media and the hype about how good Perk and Rondo are. In reality they are still children. Do you remeber what Hakeem did to Shaq in the finals when Shaq was still young?
by bigjohnson34st on Mar 11, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions
Perk
I love Perk for what he is, a bruiser that can defend, block shots, and rebound and get points off put backs and drop offs. That is what he is and all he will ever be and that’s ok. But he has to accept that and be just that. Nothing more BUT more importantly nothing less.
Ray
Ray has been playing hard and consistent all year.
He’s missed only one game (we got murdered in that game).
The only guy close to him in minutes is Rondo.
And Ray’s +/- has consistently shown him to be one and at most times the most valuable player to have on the floor.
All of our most efficient 5-man units include Ray.
Ray Allen has plain and simple been our most valuable player this year.
When you criticize him for only taking three shots – do you watch the game at all? Do you realize that while he does handle the ball, Ray’s primary role is to move without the ball. He thus cannot take shots if he does not receive the ball on an open look. Some credit has to go to the other team for playing defense designed to keep it out of his hands. Some has to go to us for not working harder to get it into his hands.
Duh
That’s my point, if you are Ray how do you NOT say something about only taking 3 shots DURING the game NOT after. Demand the f-ing ball, period! Doc not realizing Ray had 3 shots and not doing something about it is unacceptable! Ray’s been hot so you have to ride him and not forget him. I respect Ray, like his game, and understand his value. But he needs people around him playing well to have an impact. And that’s not his fault it’s just where he is in his career. Honestly, if the other 3 (Paul, Kevin, and Perk) were playing like they should we wouldn’t be talking about Ray at all. The C’s issues are many and all effect one another.
Maybe they could play like hall of famers
if they were on the court more. Everytime I look up, KG is sitting on the bench with 6 minutes left in the 3rd quarter. I know he’s been injured, but it’s time to buck up. Either he’s back, or he’s not. If they aren’t, then Doc needs to sit them and let other guys that want to play, and play hard, play.
This is really not the direction I was shooting for
And as far as I know, doc is known as one of the best drawing up plays on the fly
by Warrior Spirit on Mar 11, 2010 1:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
huh
Seriously, watch how often the C’s DON’T score coming out of time outs. And although it is easy to remember all the games they have won at the end with great shots, there are just as man if not more like vs the Bucks when they have missed shots at the end to win or tie. You mean to tell me Doc is good at drawing up let’s isolate at the top run the clock down and then shoot? I could do that!
disagree
Doc is well regarded as one of the best at scoring off time outs. I don’t know what his ranking is on that this year, but at one point late last year he had the highest rating on that.
Spot you that one
I will give you that one regarding scoring after time outs, what coach in the league watches his team routinely go through scoring droughts and does NOTHING about it?
I think I’m pretty rare around here in that I like Doc Rivers, and don’t really think this is his fault.
With that said, seems like either the players or the coach needs to change, and these players aren’t very moveable. ’Sheed’s untradeable for a year (until he’s expiring), and KG’s contract is an albatros until he proves he can play again. You could trade Rondo and/or Perk, but that doesn’t solve anything.
So, maybe it is time for Doc to take a walk. No first-time coach like Thibideau to replace him, though; you mentioned one guy (Rudy T) that might be able to get more out of this group. Another guy I like a lot (who may not be as universally loved) is Jeff Van Gundy. Either of those guys might be able to get a little more of a spark out of this squad.
In any case, though, it’s too late to make a change now; that’s all for the offseason (which is likely going to be here, oh… maybe five games into the postseason, the way things are going). Can’t make a panic move and drop Doc right now – no time for new systems to be learned, and I don’t see the team responding well.
Good call
Nice call on Van Gundy (hate his brother though). He and Coach T have a great relationship as well and I’d like to keep Coach T around for the D. The only thing that scares me about JVG is typically his teams have been brutal offensively.
greatest fear
My greatest fear is that this year will remain status quo and they will continue to be inconsistent and disappoint. Then we will be told this summer “we just need to be healthy and bring back our guys and make a run next year”. At this point, is it realistic to think that this team’s core can stay healthy for 82 games and the playoffs? I don’t think so.
I understand your fear
But I just don’t think this continues
by Warrior Spirit on Mar 11, 2010 1:21 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Hope
I so hope you are right. I am not one that tends to be negative and likes to be right. I would much rather be wrong and see this team flip the switch and get to the finals. Anything less than a finals appearance would be a failure. If this year doesn’t turn out that way then that’s why the safe move would have been to retool with Ray’s deal in Feb. Hope you and Ainge are right.
Just read...
In the new Bird/Magic book that Larry only coached 3 years because, in his opinion, after 3 years your players stop listening to you. Interesting?
true
Riley has said a similar thing and clearly Larry Brown agrees which is why he is the “coaching nomad” ha ha
Dreaming
I have been so optimistic all year until this game. My only hope now that this is the same feeling we had during the Atlanta series during the championship year. Alot of people started to think we were going to get thumped the rest of the playoffs and we all know what happened. I am holding onto that same hope I had during that Atlanta series that the adversity they are going through now will get them through. It is strange to me to see them play with no heart.
Just like when you play pickup up ball, give me 5 guys that scrap, hustle and are less talented then 5 prima donna superstars that have more talent than those scrappers. I would say the scappers seem to win most of the time…The same thing is happening here, half of the NBA teams are scrappers with less talent…and they are punishing our prima donnas.
good point
The C’s didn’t used to be prima donnas! They used to be the scrappers that played D and executed. It wasn’t pretty but it won a ring. Something has changed and they have gone away from D first and then move the ball on offense. Ultimately Doc has to take responsibility that’s just the nature of the job. I’m with you, I keep telling myself (especially after the Nets loss) that the adversity they are enduring will pay off in the end. Time will tell. Last nite’s game was the first game in years that I didn’ t bother watching. I live in California and record the games and then watch them late at night. I would say I have always been loyal and hopeful to a (green) fault. But reality is knocking on the door and I’m afraid to open it. Share your hope Timdawgg and maybe it will pay off!
Paul
Paul gets a pass with me because of all he has endured during his Celtics tenure. He should remain a Celtic for the duration of his career and then have #34 up in the rafters. With that said, he needs to opt out this summer and sign a cap friendly extension so Ainge can retool. KG and Ray don’t get that luxury with me because although they helped win banner #17 they have only been here a few years and have been paid generously. Man up and play like vets headed for the hall! Perk is the one that I can’t excuse at all.

by 




























