Celtics Can't Keep Up With Cavs
The Celtics trailed by only eight points (80-72) heading into the fourth quarter, but the Cavaliers opened the final frame on a 9-0 run, and pushed their lead to 17 (89-72). Cleveland wins it, 104-93.
- The Celtics didn't score in the fourth quarter until the 7:00 mark.
- LeBron James took just four shots and scored only six points in the first half, but exploded for 24 points in the second half. He scored 13 in the third and 11 in the fourth.
- The C's once again lost the battle of the boards, as Cleveland hauled in 51 rebounds to their 43.
- Anderson Varejao was once again a thorn in the Celtics' side. He scored 17 points and grabbed 10 rebounds off the bench. The C's entire bench could only muster 15 points today.
- Kendrick Perkins struggled once again, contributing only six points and six rebounds in the losing effort.
- In 17 minutes Rasheed Wallace scored just five points. In eight minutes, Leon Powe scored six points.
- Not a horrible day from The Big Three: 18 for Pierce and Garnett and 20 for Ray.
- Nate Robinson was nowhere to be found today...0-3 shooting and no points. It goes without saying, but the C's need more from him. Granted, he only played eight minutes.
- The Cavs took 48 free throws and made just 31 of them.
0 recs |
295 comments
|
Comments
Kendrick Perkins = Unlimited Liability Company
all by himself.
"You're about as useful as a one-legged man at an arse kicking contest." Rowan Atkinson
by The Village Idiot on Mar 14, 2010 6:21 PM EDT reply actions
When
your 2 centers (Perk and Rasheed) struggled as they did today (especially considering Shaq was out) you knew it was going to be a tough game to win.
Perk +9, Sheed -17
And Finley is useless, except for the fact that he pushed Veal off the active roster. TA should be playing not Finley.
by Celtsfansince55 on Mar 14, 2010 6:22 PM EDT reply actions
Fin's been great
Had a bad game. It’s allowed. He’s smart, plays hard, shots just didn’t fall.
Finley has been great?
I think that might be a little bit of hyperbole. He has scored points in garbage time and against a bad, bad, bad Indiana team.
He's been shooting well
..and working hard and smart on the floor. But not today.
Finley has been playing well but I doubt he keeps it up.
He has shot the ball extremely well in a low number of attempts and rebounding at a career level. I don’t think either contribution will last the test of time.
Pathetic. I can’t stand watching this team anymore. I’ll be happy again when the playoffs are over, so I won’t have to worry about the outcome of our games anymore.
P2..
They lost to one of the best teams in the league with one of the best home records, and the big 4 had solid games. People are just expecting too much from the celtics, whats wrong with 4th seed?
by thefastbreak on Mar 14, 2010 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Why did they get Nate Robinson?
He took one shot today I believe and they set up nothing for him.
What has happened to Marquis Daniels? Has he now joined the Bored Bunch?
How do they offload Sheed in the offseason?
From the optimists point of view:
It’s only March; one game is not that important; they are built for the playoffs; and this team can turn it on whenever it wants. Does that cover them all?
Bottom line — same old same old from this team, and now 2-9 versus Cleveland, Orlando and Atlanta.
"Turn it on"?
What are you talking about
by Celtsfansince55 on Mar 14, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I am listing all of the excuses we have seen posted all year
Not something that I believe at all
We hung around...
But just did not have enough fire power to get close.
We need much better performances from Sheed and Baby when we play the Cavs if we want a shot of beating them.
Its getting very frustrating seeing the C’s get beat up on the glass so often this season.
Agreed...
lack of hustle was frustrating. Only Rondo, Davis, and Garnett were hustling. Perkins especially was a zombie, just going through the motions. Another boo at the next home game might help.
"You're about as useful as a one-legged man at an arse kicking contest." Rowan Atkinson
by The Village Idiot on Mar 14, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
dont blame doc..
Our players are the reason we lost. Sheed is awful, no consistency out of the “average sized” three and our bench can’t hit water from a boat. None of that is docs fault.
by threats13 on Mar 14, 2010 6:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Why is Doc doing nothing, though?
Sheed is awful? BENCH HIM!
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Mar 14, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Dont bench him....
trade him, waste of a roster space. Sheldon can do better than him and will bring more energy as well.
We'd all love to see that for a while at least
But I think the fear is that you lose him if you do that. And we’re stuck with him for two more years. The guy can be a huge problem if he’s unmotivated. Or – even more unmotivated.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Doc's post-game quote on Sheed.
“Rasheed didn’t give us anything today.” Yep, just like most other days.
Wallace Sucks!
Wallace is lazy and a CANCER on this team! He was 1 for 8 shooting and a -17today! We were down by 2 points late in the 3rd period when he came in and down 10points when he came out in the 4th. Why doesn’t Rivers bench him in favor of Sheldon Williams? At least Sheldon will hustle and rebound!
by #1lakerhater on Mar 14, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I have Wallace as my insignia under my screen name...
..and ashamed of his play as of late. He’s showed nothing over the past few games. He’s gotten maybe a couple of inside baskets in recent games, Outside of that, he is contributing NOTHING and is taking away valuable possessions every time he guns one of his patented three point attempts. Bottom line, he has not been the player we had hoped for when he signed him this offseason, and we should be playing Big Baby over him.
Also NATE ROBINSON NEEDS TO GET MINUTES!! C’mon Doc wake up and realize that we traded away Eddie so we could get some instant offense from an offensive stud like Nate!
doc has no courage...he's too busy playing it safe by letting vets
“figure it out”….more vets and less coaching.
malcontents....the lot of you
Maybe the Celts will start practicing hard this week
You know. That new strategy where they are going to work really hard and get the key guys back into shape and sit them in some games. This is the surefire method to get this squad to the title. Not. Just one more smokescreen from Danny and Doc.
lack of stops
back-and-forth ball.. won’t win games vs. good teams.
letting the Cavs post-up on 3’s is like throwing away the game.
Rondo is not a shooter and shouldn’t act like one either.
Big 3 played well enough, bench did not and
WHERE IS NATE ????
The game was lost for good
at the start of the 4th when doc went with all bench players and they didn’t score at all
The cav’s lead doubled during that stretch. What is doc’s obsession with an all bench player second unit. They are bench players because they are NOT as good as the starters so where is the logic there?
yea BIG mistake... During the start of the 4th,
LBJ was on the bench.. and we were only down by EIGHT POINTS! Doc should have used the starters while LBJ was on the bench, and maybe they could have gotten that 8 point lead into a tie, or get us ahead. But instead while Lebron was on the bench, Doc decided to use the bench and because of that, the Cavs went cruising, into a 12 point lead before he let the starters come back…
Me? I'm just a girl who loves the Celtics...
where are the promised changes Doc ????
USE YOUR TOOLS RIVERS !!!!!!!!
there are things to work with but I just think its impossible because of Doc
the champs were in sync with each other and everyone knew their rolls. Its not the case with these guys. The fixable problems are:
1. Tell sheed he is killing us and he’ll sit him now.(no way doc does this)
2. tell perk he is lacking effort on d(won’t happen)
3. pp looked engaged today. Ray always does.
4. tell baby to keep it up but pass out if he can’t go right back up.
5. tell the guys all to shut up until they prove they can beat someone(won’t happen)
6. this sleep doc foolishness has been killing us. the guys are all soft and act like it. tell them
7. tell rr he has to stay in front of his man. period
8. Daniels looks like a waste lately. I don’t even understand it. But finley is a capable player and he’ll try.
9. Make Nate play his game, give him his minutes.
Pierce's D
against LeBron was great today: giving him the outside but cutting him off on drives, blocking passing lanes, going over screens. Then, in the second half, they seemed to change strategies, for the worse: having Pierce front him a couple of times, then more of a funneling into the lane to the big guys. Unfortunately, the big guys, excepting KG, sucked.
Pierce is not done. He played great D against the best player in the league.
Actually, it looked like LeBron didn't want to score in the first half
… and was saving it for the 2nd half. Used the first half to get his team involved, take advantage of the Cs’ double-teams, etc. Once he turned it on in Q3, Paul could not stop him. At one point, LBJ broke Paul’s ankles and sent him to ground with a simple crossover.
Rebounding is the biggest issue
Ot lack thereof…
Unfortunately that is the most consistent thing about this team.
by nba is the worst on Mar 15, 2010 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions
did we give up Eddie for nothing ????
PLAY KRYPTO- NATE
coulda used Eddie that game
if Nate saw time he coulda put up 14 points
come on Doc PLAY NATE
The lack of Nate playing time today was astounding
I think Doc has too many veterans now and he does not know how to handle it. Too many veterans, which means Doc has to play everyone because he does not want anyone to be angry at him.
Lots not to like
Second unit stunningly punchless. Finley, Marquis and Sheed unproductive. No plays for Nate. As for the starters, Perk uninvolved. KG good but no explosiveness (getting blocked frequently). Paul looks hurt or uninterested. Ray okay if given WIDE open shot. Baby and Rondo only bright spots in this one.
Have to blame Danny more than Doc. But we’ll always have 2007.
Doc is playing Finley over Nate
because he’s buddies with him.
knew the kid when he was born to a cheerleader when Doc was
in high school.
so Nate Robinson warms the bench.
NATE ROBINSON.
unreal. Doc is a problem. I believe that now.
other coaches would beg to have this roster
and Doc can’t figure out how to use his tools.
the more i think about it the more i’m starting to see
Doc doesn’t know what he’s doing.
He really doesn’t know what he’s doing !
that’s all i have to say today.
Bench came up short
I missed the first half, so I can’t comment on that but it was tied somewhere around the 4 minute mark in the 3rd. Then, the bench started rotating in and the lead went back to 8. Doc kept them out there and the lean ballooned to 17 and that was all she wrote.
Van Gundy was saying something like “Doc is showing his trust in the bench by not trying to close the gap with the starters while LeBron sits”. No, actually Doc is just showing his inability to adjust during the game.
Out bench shot 5 for 25.
Our starters as a whole were actually plus for the game.
But the bench – which has played well recently – totally stunk.
They also stunk in the last CLE game.
Basically, Cleveland’s bench has out-played ours each of these two games – significantly.
I don't mind it
The bench needs to get some PT, and the team needs to figure out its playoff rotation. If Doc had played PP and Ray during that stretch, we’d be bitching about too many minutes. At this point, I’ll take a loss over playing people 40 minutes.
Not bad till the 4th, overall: pathetic
- Paul at times looked almost INCAPACITATED out there. Like he needed a wheelchair. Like a good-3pt-shooting high school varsity player. Just pathetic, much of the time. At one point in Q4, he was sprawling on the floor more than he was playing. Dribbling off his leg. Letting LeBron break his ankles with a simple crossover (and he fell again, of course). Etc. With a bench as deep as Doc has, was there NO ONE he could sub in for Paul in Q4? Just amazing that Doc would continue to play the worst player on the floor, just because he’s one of the “Big 3” (apologies for the anachronism).
- Refs were terrible, worse than usual. Q3 10:30 – they called a travel on Paul for doing EXACTLY what LeBron did all game long… gather + 2 steps, specifically legal now. A million fouls for the Cavs. At one point, LeBron DRIBBLED THE BALL OUT OF BOUNDS, still no call. (Refs not an excuse, though.)
- Cavs got 5 points due to sheer blind luck: the falling-down 3 by Lebron in Q1, and the rebound tip by Varejao that (ridiculously) found its way to the net. It mattered, till Q4. Then it didn’t matter anymore.
- Some silly TOs, including 2 thrown-away passes in a row at about 4:00 in Q3 (both = failure to roll, first by Perk, then by Paul).
- Perk had a pretty good 1st half – NO dribbling on deep catches! After than, nada – except fouls and missed FTs.
- And of course, the 4th quarter collapse. Killer.
You cannot play that way against a team as good as the Cavs and hope to win. They should be happy, I suppose, that they weren’t blown out. We can thank some last minute long-distance shooting by Ray and Paul for that.
identity theft!!
Someone steal your moniker?
You’ve been all sunshine, rainbows and unicorns this year in the face of some really poor play by this team. I’m actually stunned to see your name attached to this negative a post.
I’m not disagreeing with you, just can’t believe you’re the one saying it.
I didn't think PP looked that bad today.
Yes, his offense wasn’t there in the first half, but I thought he did a decent job on defense against LeBron. Then in the second half his offense picked up. “A good 3-pt shooting high school varsity player?” C’mon! That’s harsh! These guys play at an amazing level in the NBA, nowhere close to most high school ball.
That is a little harsh
But honestly, Pierce’s biggest threat right now is the three-pointer. He can no longer get to the rim against good or slightly better than average defenders.
paul pierce as the truth is a game changer---heck season complexion
changer. now he’s gettin his sabonis on.
malcontents....the lot of you
Did you really take that seriously?
Ok… saying Paul Pierce was at high school level is, yes, an exaggeration.
Actually, he looked more like he had just come from an old age home.
Can I just add?
The refs did NOT call a million fouls for the Cavs.
Uh, yes.
I took the high school comment pretty seriously, not the million fouls, though, because I knew a thousand was more accurate.
Specifically, PFs: 33 on Celtics. 19 on Cavs
Free Throws:
Celtics 23 of 30
Cavs 31 of 48
Outside of that, Cleveland made exactly 1 (yes ONE) basket from the field more than the Celtics. A 3 pointer.
One 3PT shot plus 8 free throws made == winning margin.
Let's call that one 3-pointer LeBron's falling-down magic 3
… in Q1, created by the Fates just to torture us. (Btw… happy to give him that shot all day long… obviously.)
So I guess the refs caused the Celtics to lose today
Just wanted to check
They did suck
But no, not the cause, imo. M will speak for himself :)
only if you think the PF disparity wasn't fair
I haven’t reviewed the film yet to make that call.
I only note the numbers here because they add up so tidy.
banking on the hope of the three ball to get us back into games....how depressing
malcontents....the lot of you
Defense was poor-to-mediocre too
They got a LOT of wide open 3s. Luckily they missed as many as they did. But they hit enough of them to hurt. Could have been a whole lot worse… if they had been a little more accurate with their wide-open 3s, it would have been a total blowout.
I wish we could trade KG for Brook Lopez...
Nets would laugh at that though..KG is really not athletic anymore, he is done…he can trashtalk all he wants but he ain’t goin back to KG of 08…sad,sad plight of this team, we are going down in the first round, specially if we face the surging, best record in the league since the trade deadline Milwaukee Bucks…and for the record, Im predicting it now that our record next yr would be between 35-40 wins tops if we don’t change our old aging core.
"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."
If We Go Down In The First Round
We’re gonna change our old, aging core by next year’s trade deadline. At least 1-2 big moves.
Ainge not going back to the black hole just so he can send a team out there to lose in the first or second round.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Agree
I think Ainge has hinted about that. Not sure if it’ll be possible tho.
Can't agree
KG is doing fine. Had a decent game. There are much bigger problems on this team. Paul, for example. Sheed and Perk too. And the offensive and defensive collapses they go through from time to time, for no apparent reasons. Etc.
We came
pretty close to evening it up aboutt he middle of the third quarter, but two bad passes (KG, Rondo) killed the momentum we had. After that the game was just extremely painful to watch. I’m an optimist but I’m not liking what I’m seeing from the C’s at all if I see them play.
Honestly i dont see them getting out of the second round the way things are.
Those 2 bad passes
… at about 4:00 of Q3… were not all the throwers’ faults.
The first time, Perk raised his arm, calling for the ball from in front of the right block. So KG threw it toward the basket, correctly assuming that Perk intended to ROLL TO THE HOOP, which is what he’s supposed to do. Instead, Perk moved TO KG (who knows why), and the pass went out of bounds.
The 2nd time was a duplicate of the first, except that time Rondo threw the lead pass to Paul, who had also just called for it.
Paul seemed out of it pretty much this whole game. Like he was DIZZY or something. Perk is Perk… who knows what goes on in his mind.
regardless
I felt like those two plays killed whatever the C’s had going at that point. Perk looked like he was sleepwalking. I felt like the team wasn’t agressive going to the hoop until it was too late.
I dont really
get a chance to watch C’s games that often but everytime this year I’ve been able to catch one i walk away saddened by either effort or non-sensical plays…
Liked PP's D for the most part
But offensively, was in a funk again.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Did you see Paul break his ankles and fall?
… when LeBron did a simple little crossover on him, on the left side? Just pathetic. Really, it was like watching someone from an old age home trying to keep up.
Paul remains a big problem.
Yeah...
But he did a decent job on him, first half in particular…..
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions
The problem
was the strategy, not PP’s play. They changed the way they guarded LeBron in the second half, with more fronting and forcing him to the big guys. It was a stupid strategy, and Thibs should be held accountable for it. I’d much, much rather make have LeBron be a passer and make his teammates make shots.
Or it could have been LeBron's strategy
… seemed that way.
neither was the key issue.
Pierce & Lebron weren’t the deciding factor at all. They were just sort of ‘there’ in the game.
The ‘strategic’ issue of the game was KG being in deep foul trouble.
He left with 4 fouls still in the 3rd with the game at 70-68 after they had fought their way back to tie at 68-68. By the time he came back, they were down 10. And just as you might think they could fight back one more time – KG picked up his 5th within seconds of coming back in. Game over.
Fair or not, foul trouble dictated this game. The on-court play was actually very close.
As much as I like Sheed overall, I do NOT like him subbing at PF against front-liners. He’s fine at C and also at PF against scrubs. But he can’t keep up with the top tier PFs anymore. So when we have to cut KG’s minutes due to foul trouble, and put Sheed in at PF for minutes where the matchup is not ideal, its ugly on defense.
Frustratingly, though – during that stretch, we did manage on offense to get the ball in the post to Sheed on three consecutive plays and unusually we did not convert any of those. For all his faults on defense (against better PFs), usually this year if Sheed gets the ball in close to the basket, he’s going to convert more times than not. But like the rest of the Celtic bench, he couldn’t make shots yesterday. Credit the Cav’s bench defense if you want.
Pierce and Lebron both played decent games – sort of ‘average’ games for where they are usually at these days with the one difference from the norm being that Pierce could not get to the foul line to save his life.
And also, LeBron has his way with Paul in the 2nd half
One more thing: I’m still hoping that Sheed has another gear he hasn’t gone to yet. He’s said as much, and he has that history. And that other gear might include… should include… much more effort on defense (where effort is what’s it’s all about). I don’t know if, with a FULL effort, Sheed can do the job… but I think he can, yes.
I don't think Sheed can defend the better PFs in the league anymore
(without help).
But ideally, if we are healthy and do our match-ups right, he shouldn’t be asked to do so.
We'll see
Until we see Sheed in the playoffs, can’t be sure.
How so?
Why can’t we tell whether or not Rasheed can defend power forwards from regular season play?
Because the working theory about Sheed
… is that he’s waiting for the playoffs to flip his switch. He has said as much, and he has that history.
pshh, we'll give them that one...
the Cavaliers have existed for over 40 years and still have yet to win a game in the NBA Finals, not as if that’s any excuse for our uninspired play this afternoon.
Either way we know that we can beat them at home this season (see season opener) so I’m not too worried…it’s not like the Cavs are going to go on and win 17 titles from here on out but a loss is a loss. Hopefully our guys aren’t too down on themselves :p
I wouldnt exactly
count the season opener as applicable now. I mean, it was the season opener, and most teams are pretty shaky at that point, getting used to the grind of the regular season all over again.
Honestly I think the Cavs are still on the uprise and will not win anything just yet, but next year is solid time for them. hopefully by that time we get a bit younger. make it happen danny!
You should be worried
Not because of the losing or winning. Because of the way they played.
Well, they sucked. That's the truth of it
I mean, watching Paul was so sad. He was pathetic out there. And Sheed. And Perk. And Doc, with his “rotations” (what rotations?). Etc. they came out with some energy, but just couldn’t hang on, couldn’t hold it for 48.
agree
paul has a hard time just staying on his feet. sometimes its hard to watch these guys.
nevertheless we’ve seen a lot of worse and more puzzling performances from the C’s in the last month or two.
no shame in losing to the cavs on the road – there’s so little room for error.
One good thing about today
At least in the Herald pre-game story, Doc said he though the Celtics were going to win today. Now there’s a silver lining for you all.
Here is the really sad,sad part.....
Sideshow Bob is better than all our bigs combined…he outhustles them, he toys with em, annoys them and gets the better of KG/Perk/Sheed.
"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."
He's fantastic
Would just love to have him on our team. Him – or Noah.
Both guys bring exactly what we need.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions
When KG fronted Verejao on a free throw rebound to box him out
and then got a stupid foul by putting his elbows into Verejao’s neck/face twice, I knew ther game was over. Second straight game where Sideshow Bob has outplayed all of our “star” front line guys.
Not that impressed.
He’s just a long-haired version of Baby.
6 of his 10 rebounds were offensive. I know folks get all atwitter in their panties over them, but they are simply not as important as grabbing defensive rebounds. They just extend a possession off a missed shot.
The reality is that on those 6 CLE possessions, they missed their shot and Varejao grabbed the rebound. He put one back for 2 pts and got 2 assists for 4 more. Six possessions thus resulted in 6 pts. 1 pt per possession. Surprise surprise! That’s pretty much AVERAGE.
Yes, Cleveland ‘out-rebounded’ us on the offensive end: 11 to 17. The thing is, while we took the same number of FGAs and had nearly identical misses (we shot 32-80 so had 48 missed FGAs while they shot 33-80 and so had 47 missed FGAs) they also had 17 missed free throws to our 7!! Some of those were the first of two, so not rebounding chances. But overall they had probably around 10 or so additional offensive rebounding chances due to the additional free throws. Considering that we purposely are indifferent to offensive rebounds, i’m not all that impressed by the 17-11 ratio.
Defensive boards are much more important because a defensive board means the other team gets ZERO points for that possession.
Cleveland grabbed 34 defensive rebounds. We grabbed 32. That’s a little more irritating because by the same logic above, we had a few more chances and should have grabbed a couple more. But it clearly wasn’t a case of us getting completely shut out of the boards.
As I said above – the game ultimately came down to two things: They made one more field goal (a 3 pt shot) and they went to the line 18 more times than we did (making 8). Thus the 11 pt margin.
Jeeze if our bench could have made any shots today (they shot 5 of 25!!!) …. ugh.
Bobby also hustles, a lot
Something the Cs forget from time to time.
Re: Baby comparison and rebounding
It’s worth noting here that the next season Varejao posts a defensive rebound rate less than 20 percent will be his first. The next season Davis posts a DRR better than 14 percent will be his first.
He is a significantly better overall rebounder than Davis.
Beyond that, I’m also considerably more interested in having Varejao than Davis at the defensive end.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Mar 15, 2010 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I was really commenting on his performance in this one game.
It was very ‘baby-like’.
But yeah, I agree otherwise.
Gotcha
Thanks for clarifying, m^5.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Mar 15, 2010 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Brings to mind what would have happened
…had the Cavs hit their average number of FTs and 3pt shots (.723 & .392 respectively). They would have gotten ~4 more points on their FTs, and ~5 more on their 3pt attempts. That total of 9 more points would have made this a 20-point blowout.
Well, that's moot because the margin was largely already made up of the excess FTs that they *made*
Whether they shot them more efficiently is sorta beyond that point. They got to the line those extra 18 times.
Moot to the outcome
But it coulda… arguably shouda… been a blowout. Worse, i.e. Nevermind tho…. it’s mostly irrelevant.
He's soft....and thats embarrising what hes doin against us
When he gets physicaled, he shuts right down—-thats been his m.o.—yeah he’s hustles..energy…yaddayadda. but he’s a big faker, winer, and flopper. I have no respect for this guy. He can’t do that on an evenly matched team. he’s an indictment as where we are on our inside game.
malcontents....the lot of you
Doc is a "vanilla" coach.
we’re not talking about a basketball MIND here.
that’s for sure.
I just wish doc would get pissed off once
It would not solve any problems, but it would make me feel better. But, he is Mr. nice guy and he wants to make sure all of his friends get to play, and he and Danny want to make sure everyone sleeps late every day, because that is what the sleep doctor told them. Blah blah blah.
More nate, less sheed, sheed is so pathetic! Lebron still has won nothing.
by Blackberry33 on Mar 14, 2010 7:20 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
so what is the point about Lebron winning nothing?
KG won nothing until his 13th year in the league. Pierce won nothing until his 11th year in the league. Ray won nothing until his 12th year in the league.
Lebron will win one...
Its just so inevitable, there is no way Stern would allow Lebron to be ringless thoughout his career.
"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."
Stern doesn't have anything to do with it
Lebron will win because he’s that good. Conspiracy theories are sour grapes.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions
So how did Grande excuse them this time?
He always says “it’s not their fault”. Always Refers to Last three years and ignores what is happening right in front of him. Come on Grande – step it up!
by Celtico on Mar 14, 2010 7:22 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
lets go for the 3rd seed!
with the current standing.. if we will be the 3rd seed will face Hawks. if we are in 4th then will see these arrogant team again!
I thought I just heard CSN say that if we’re the 4th seed we’ll face the Bucks in the first round (as of now of course).
Give Sheed the message.
Sheed shooting 3’s proves that Doc Rivers has gone from coach of the year in 2008 to dope of the year in 2010. Sheed’s all done. WAKE UP DOC!! If you have to use Sheed tell him to stay down. That’s 1 reason why the Celtics get their but*s kicked on the boards. 2 more years on Sheed’s contract what a depressing thought that is. The only thing that Sheed excels in is getting hit with technical fouls. Sit Sheed down and give Sheldon Williams some serious playing time.
Getting beat is 1 thing but the way this team gets out rebounded is a disgrace.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 7:27 PM EDT reply actions
Sheed only attempted two 3PT shots
so I don’t know what the heck you are ranting about.
More troublesome tonight was how he went 1 for 6 close in. But then the whole bench was just wicked cold shooting today – you can’t just pick on Sheed when the entire bench shoots 5 for 25. You have to pick on all of them (Nate, BBD, Daniels, Finley).
That’s awful shooting and it just killed us. Just ‘average’ shooting would have sunk 5-7 more of those. That’s 10-21 pts missed. Ouch.
agree totally
although sheed deserves all the flack he gets for coming in overweight, and acting like he’s a broke robert horry……I can live with 2 threes from him as long as he takes 10 to the rim.
malcontents....the lot of you
Cavs defense had nothing to do with the Celts' bench FG%
As has been the recent trend, Celtics lost 3 of 4 quarters in the game
by nba is the worst on Mar 15, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Sheed's problem
is defense. He misses two 3s, I don’t care as much, but his not boxing out, his defending the fastbreak, his horrible rebounding are inexcusable. He’s killing this team right now.
If you look closely, Sheed's defensive problems
come almost ALWAYS when his is subbing for KG at PF against starting quality PFs.
Against most bench PFs and against most centers he actually has played very well on defense.
But he simply isn’t athletic enough to handle the first string power forwards in the league anymore on defense (his offense in that role is still decent). This is why having a healthy KG is so key because a healthy KG allows Sheed to play against second-string PFs and Cs.
Unfortunately in yesterday’s game, KG got into deep foul trouble so we kept putting Sheed in when the matchup was … not ideal …
Not sure if Sheed can't do it anymore
…or has chosen not to so far. We’ll find out soon… but it’s possible that with a FULL effort, something we haven’t yet seen from Sheed, he’ll show us some things we thought had passed him by.
Sheed’s boxing out has frustrating me more than anything this season.
In the past, he was excellent at keeping his man off the glass. I didn’t notice such a large decline last season when he was with the Pistons so I’ve been wholly surprised at how bad Wallace has been this season in terms of boxing out his man. Very disappointing.
His ability to keep his man off the glass helped offset his poor individual rebounding numbers, how many times he grabbed the rebound, because it kept the team rebounding very strong. That doesn’t exist anymore and his lack of rebounding is a much larger issue.
Kobe Bryant is annoying
Kobe is annoying
Doc's
Decision are mind boggling. Please fire him. How many more do we need to lose? Kick him to the curb.
by Ragetti on Mar 14, 2010 7:32 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
But they did play a pretty good first half
If not for the 5 points the Cavs got from blind luck (LBJ’s falling 3 and Sideshow’s ridiculous tip-in), it would have been a 1 point game. Their defense was pretty solid in the first half (not at the 3-line, but elsewhere), and their offense was reasonable, considering Paul and Ray weren’t shooting well then.
So – something positive there, anyway.
1 Good Quarter is Enough
to beat the Celtics and I think teams know this.
at the risk of repeating myself
the difference in scoring came down to one additional 3PT shot and their making 8 of 18 additional free throws.
Lol! Thanks for the happy thoughts.
Yes, if games were only half as long, we’d have a pretty great record.
Doc
Wonder whether Ainge / the Owners would relieve Doc of his duties first or whether Doc would step down for “family reasons”? What’s the over / under? Can’t believe he’s loving this anymore than we are but he knows his hands are tied with some guys and their contracts.
He seems very torn
About being away from his family. I doubt he has the stomach for another rebuild.
He’ll be able to get another coaching job for the next decade. I could see him leaving….
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions
ditto
I don’t see Doc going down with the ship, but then again would he turn down the cash?
If this was supposed to be yet another game to show where we're at . . .
unfortunately, I really think it did. 4th in the east, that’s us. I’m not sure if we’re physically capable of being any better any more. The Cavs and a lot of other young athletic teams are just flat out better than us. And, boy, is Orlando on a roll. Now that’s how you’re supposed to play going into the playoffs. So I’ll just enjoy the ride for as long as it lasts and be thankful we’re still a pretty good team who still has a chance, albeit a slim one. You’d think I could at least get into the Cavs a little, only living an hour from Cleveland, but for some strange reason I’ve always hated them and loved the C’s. Go figure!
The coach.
At the age of 75 Tommy Heinsohn would get a lot more out of this team than Doc is.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 7:45 PM EDT reply actions
He could also play better D than Sheed.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I guess the worrisome thing for me
…is that I think they tried today. They came out trying, anyway. After the drama of the Grizzlies game – I think they wanted to do well. You could see it in their work on defense, which was quite good in the first half. But they left with a pathetic performance.
So can that change in the playoffs? Key question. Yes, it CAN change… because when the going gets hard, as it did in the 2nd half, perhaps in the playoffs guys will step up better. But let’s look at the specific issues. Of the big problems today – Paul, Sheed, to some extent Perk, and always Doc – only Sheed can reasonably be expected to react MUCH BETTER in the playoffs than he did today.
- Paul’s problem seems physical. He looked OLD, clumsy, awkward, almost frail.
- Perk’s brain isn’t gonna grow any new neurons.
- Neither is Doc’s.
So – that’s why it’s worrisome.
PP is like KG
Both are aging all-star players in decline.
So you get good games and bad games.
It wouldn’t be a shock to see PP drop 30 on Detroit.
It also wouldn’t be a shock if he got blocked 5 times.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions
See, I think KG's doing great
His “off” games = games when his shot isn’t falling. But that happens to EVERYBODY. It’s not a physical problem for KG that his shots don’t fall. Physically, he’s doing very well, in every game lately. And getting better just about every time out.
Paul… Paul is sad to watch. The decline in his game is dramatic. I can’t even IMAGINE him hitting 30 anymore… unless the opponents don’t play any D at all, I suppose. Paul looked lost, almost dizzy out there today. Confused. Helpless.
If this continues into the playoffs – and I suspect that it will – Doc may turn to Finley as a Paul replacement. Maybe… but it’s Doc, I forget… so scratch that.
PP/KG
KG simply isn’t the man-to-man defender he was in previous years. Nor is his rebounding on the same plane with where it was even at the beginning of last year. And he’s not explosive. He’s looked okay lately, good even, at times. But he’s clearly going downhill. He’s no longer a #1 player on a title team. He’s a #2 or #3.
PP seems really odd to me. Unengaged offensively most of the time. Not sure if it’s injury related or age related but he simply can’t finish the way he did even in November. Which makes me think a lingering injury is the problem.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
You are right
He had 5 rebounds today in 28 minutes. And he, like every other Celtics big man not named Glan Davis, was totally outplayed and outhustled by Anderson Verejao. KG, however, was not the problem today.
KG had 7 total rebounds
5 defensive and 2 offensive.
5 of 11 shooting and 8 for 8 from FT line. A block & a steal. That’s not a bad game.
Unfortunately 3 TOs and getting called for 5 PFs (one of which was an offensive foul accounting for one of the TOs) hurt.
Foul trouble early is part of WHY he was only playing 28 minutes in a game like this. He had 4 fouls early in the 3rd. Heck, he had 3 with over 4 minutes left in the 2nd. They sub in Davis for him – and then Davis promptly racked up his own 3rd PF! Then, just 2 minutes into the 3rd – zap – KG gets a 4th PF. Doc stuck with him for a while, but they pulled him for Sheed with 4:25 left in the 3rd and us trailing by only 2 (70-68).
By the time KG re-entered with 9:27 left in the game, we were back down by 10 again. And within 19 seconds, KG had his 5th PF. Game over.
we're getting waaay more outta kg then we are outta paul
take away pauls 3 ball and he’s cooked. Kg is giving more out there imop..
malcontents....the lot of you
Pierce's health
Can’t be sure if Pierce is still recovering from the various injuries he battled through earlier in the season…But say he is…Isn’t he allowed to have good and bad games kind of like KG had when he was coming back from the hyperextended right knee? Because, while you say he didn’t look great today, I could argue he looked great against Indiana…Had the two alley-oops from Rondo, with one of them being a legitimate dunk…A guy who’s now “clumsy” “awkward” and “frail” probably wouldn’t have been able to finish those two plays, specifically.
My points is…say he’s still going through the standard rehab process in terms of working his way back to full strength…Isn’t he almost expected to have good and bad games while he works back to a consistent level?
Well, that's a ray of light, anyway
Certainly hope you’re right. But fear you’re wrong…. because he has had many more bad games than good.
But there’s more than that. It’s the WAY his game was bad. The hesitancy… the awkwardness and imbalance… the dazed look on his face… the falling down I-don’t-know-HOW-may-times, including once just because LeBron crossed him over… it was scary. It’s almost as if Paul can do good-LOOKING athletic feats if they are straightforward/simple – like run-catch-jump-dunk. But as soon as things get a little hard… like having a defender in front of him… he loses it.
It’s kind of hard for me to even convey exactly why this feels bad to me (Paul’s state, I mean). On some level, it’s instinct… I’ve evaluated a lot of people and after doing that for a few years, you get a sense of things even before you get hard data. I have that sense watching Paul, and it’s negative.
Basically, I’m worried that he’s actually in a bad way, and that the occasional good things we see are the red herrings.
Hope that’s wrong.
I don't see it.
I swear to gawd sometimes you must have a reality distortion field on your TV set.
Pierce was missing shots early, but basically played a pretty sound game from that point. Unfortunately, he could not buy a foul and, like KG got into PF trouble for every sneeze he made.
I agree with mmmmm
Your take on PP and on Perk a couple nights ago both seem beamed in from another planet. :+)
by TheOutletPass on Mar 15, 2010 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Huh???
- Did you not see him fall down umpteen times in the 2nd half?
- Did you not see him dribble off his leg in Q4?
- Did you not see him break his ankles due to a simple crossover from LeBron (and fall again)?
- Did you not see the dazed look on his face?
- The 3 TOs, plus at least one more they didn’t count (when he waved to Rondo for the ball, then rolled TO Rondo instead of to the basket, in Q3 ~4:00)?
- The 42% FG%, inflated by buckets made when the game was already lost?
- The NEAR-TOTAL inability to keep up with LeBron once LeBron decided to take the ball to the hoop himself (which started in the 2nd half – LBJ spend the 1st half distributing: the classic superstar plan).
- The unsteady, confused manner of his movements?
Really – what were you watching??? Both of you. Are you kidding me? Paul was as pathetic and BAD as I’ve ever seen him. You CANNOT be arguing that he was good… no, you CAN’T be doing that!
PP
Looked lively and spry against Indiana. That he didn’t play his best game against the best player in the game (and I’ll argue his D was a lot better than you will) is not surprising.
Nobody can guard Lebron on the dribble.
But the thing that’s least credible to me is quoting stuff like “the dazed look on his face” or “dribbling off his leg” as indicative of some crisis.
He’s in decline and perhaps injured. We’ll see some good games and bad games. He can still get it up (see the recent couple of flying dunks against IND, I think) but that’ll be irregular now.
Paul’s PER the last few years:
23.71
21.73
19.85
17.74
17.08 (this year)
He’s falling off but for health might be at a PER of 18+ this year.
Counter for you since you didn’t respond elsewhere in this post-game thread:
Do you really think KG is gonna be a 100% of himself this year but Paul’s hopeless? They’re on the same track – a gradual decline with upward spikes. All the numbers suggest just that.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 15, 2010 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Well... ok, but we're talking about THIS game
If you want to discuss his future, and his overall arc… ok, that’s a different discussion, one that is much less clear. I don’t know whether he will or will not get better. I have a feeling that he won’t, but that’s as far as I’m willing to go with that. I don’t disagree with any of the hard points in your last post, actually.
The difference between PP and KG is that KG has been on a pretty clear +slope curve since he returned from injury, with a few relatively minor downturns, typical of this kind of recovery process. Paul – since his return from whatever “injury” he recently had (they said thumb, but it’s likely other things were going on) – has been going sideways, mostly. I don’t see that his slope is positive… mostly it’s about 0, a flat line, with several dips downward, and occasional blips upward. So he’s more worrisome. But as I said… it’s more of a feeling about Paul’s ultimate destination… it feels bad, because of the TYPE of problems he’s had. I already went through that earlier, so won’t repeat.
You can take out the subjective parts like “dazed look” and “confused manner”. Those are my views, not facts. But friend, he DID dribble off his leg… that is a fact.
But m seems to think he had a pretty good game. THIS game. That does not compute for me, at all.
I think we understand each other
Just think it’s clear we have to live with these ups and downs from Paul. It’s the new normal. Unfortunately.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 15, 2010 1:57 AM EDT up reply actions
please re-read my words when you stop ranting
He missed shots early but then had a fairly decent game.
That is true. 18 pts on 6 of 14 and 3 of 3 from the line is a decent (not great) game. Only getting to the line 3 times sucked – as I commented. He couldn’t draw a single foul today despite 4-5 layup attempts and 4-5 other shots taken with contention. In a ‘normal’ pierce game, you would expect a 5-6 more points from free throws. So in that case he’d have posted 23-24 pts and there would be no real cause for complaining.
So what if he dribbled a ball off his leg. Talk about irrelevant. Stuff like that happens.
I’m not saying Pierce had a great game. But it wasn’t the disaster you try to portray it as. His numbers show it was a fairly normal Pierce output except for the lack of trips to the foul line.
Paul did not lose this game for us. We lost it with the poor shooting of our bench, plain and simple. And it wasn’t just one guy on the bench. Everybody on the bench shot like they were wearing blindfolds.
Last sentence I agree with
To everything else: Oh…. My…. God.
Yes, it was a disaster. ’Nuf said… we disagree.
Playing D
Stevie Wonder could play better D than Sheed is.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 7:49 PM EDT reply actions
Celts may have reached a turning point today here on Celtics blog
I think it is interesting, that few if anyh of the blind optimists are posting after today’s loss. Usually they are all here trying to refute the reality of the game and painting a picture of why the Celtics still have a great chance to win it all,. And, one of the main guys, DRJ1, is even expressing doubts now. I think today’s comments after this game might say something about where the vast majority of fans now sit — could be wrong though.
Think we all hold out faint hope for a playoff return to form
And nobody expects it anymore. Except for those who are willingly deluding themselves.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions
i still believe we can win this ring! if we are the 3rd seed!
Hawks in the 2nd round doesnt worry me. it scare me a bit but come playoffs we’ll be much better. rem. the last game with this athletic team, they win because of those ridiculous 3pts of Crawford. but thats about it!
and of course i know LBJ wont get pass Magic!
Magic-Celts conference finals! we can beat these guys!
No reason to dwell...
let the truth set you free. the celtics just are not on the same level as the cavs, or any of the other top teams in the league. this team is a middle of the pack playoff team. should make for an interesting first round series, but when the top team separate themselves in the playoffs, the celtics will not be among them.
Totally agree. It’s over. We got a title for essentially nothing, and I’m happy with that. Now, it’s time for Ainge to figure out how to avoid to slip back into the abyss.
I cant agree more.
It was a great run while it lasted. Boston got another banner. Now its time to rebuild. Anyone who disagrees is in denial.
When was the last time a player entered the Boston sports scene
and became despised as quickly as Rasheed has? I guess Julio Lugo comes to mind, or Eric Gagne.
The playoffs.
Being a longtime Celtics season ticket holder as long as the L.A. Fakers don’t win the championship I’ll be happy….VERY HAPPY
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 7:57 PM EDT reply actions
Classic
Pretty good chance you’ll be disappointed
by nba is the worst on Mar 15, 2010 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions
regardless of the issues
including Doc’s lack of oversight
and bad roster implementation,
the good news is the Celtics were
roughly even with one of the top teams in the NBA tonight until the 4th.
this team is looking better.
it's really not
They play well for three quarters or one game or a half, but there’s another Memphis-style game coming soon. Any real progress is illusory.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I know
And we talk about our aging players like they’re cancer patients.
“Oh, KG had a good day today. It was so nice to see.”
by TheOutletPass on Mar 14, 2010 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions
don't let the final numbers from ray and paul
fool you. those were garbage points. when we needed them to score and get us going they couldn’t either because they missed or because they didn’t get shot attempts. once again all of those missed layups get in our head and dictated how we played. I liked how we attacked them early but once again perk couldn’t get the job done. let’s face it: he’s a hard working guy who has made himself into a player but he is not quick and he is not that skilled. we need to pay more attention to getting pierce and ray allen going than perkins.
Don't get mad...
I won’t be mad if the Cav’s win it all. They have 0 NBA championships and have been in the league since 1970.
Don’t be mad if they break their cherry at age 40…LOL
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 8:07 PM EDT reply actions
break their cherry??
What does that mean?
by Celtico on Mar 14, 2010 8:15 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Doc is dumb as a fox
Why show all your cards now? Keep Nate under wraps is a good idea. Unleash him later I say.
by Celtico on Mar 14, 2010 8:14 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
perkins will be gone
Sometime this summer. And not for summer vacation. Wonder what his value will be?
maybe off your fantasy team
He’s not going anywhere in real life.
Maybe not
But I hope he goes. He will if Danny (a) sees the reality, and (b) is able to find the right deal.
Prediction
Danny will deal him and eventually replace him with a more athletic big to run with Rondo.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 15, 2010 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Doc is dumb as a fox?
If Doc is waiting to unleash Nate Robinsonn he better give him enough playing time to blend in with the team. Sitting on the bench will not accomplish that.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 8:20 PM EDT reply actions
perk will be a summer band aid
Someone to bring back a body or two to cover up other inadequacies.
What break their cherry means.
That means the Cav’s are virgins and if they win the championship it will be the first time that they’ve gone all the way.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 8:29 PM EDT reply actions
it isn't closed
just on the verge of shutting down. heh.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell
Yes, intimidation is the key to domination.
by Marjun Raposon on Mar 14, 2010 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions
should have already started
Ainge should have started retooling this team at the deadline because you could tell at that point that Sheed and Marquis the summer additions weren’t enough. But Ainge made a HUGE mistake not moving his one valuable chip, Ray’s expiring deal. Not to mention TA and Scal’s expiring deals.
The window being clcsed.
Going from 24-58 in the 2006-2007 season to winning the 17th NBA championship in the 2007-2008 season was worth it. A lot of teams would love to have the window closed like that.
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 14, 2010 8:40 PM EDT reply actions
It's makes me sad to see
how the championship window is so short for my other favorite player, KG (the other is Dirk). He should have asked Kevin MChale for a trade as early as 2005. It don’t matter to me if it is on the Celtics or not, because he was so good back then that he deserve a better team than what Mchale can offer. His “best” team was with Sam Cassell and Latrell Spreewell, Wally Szczerbiak, and of course Olowokandi at center. Yikes.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell
Yes, intimidation is the key to domination.
correction:
It instead of It’s…
what i mean is he should have asked for a trade as early as the 05-06 season. After Cassell and Spreewell left.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell
Yes, intimidation is the key to domination.
by Marjun Raposon on Mar 14, 2010 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions
statement game
This was indeed a statement game. The statement made is that this team CAN’T beat the elite teams anymore. Their record against the top flight teams is horrible. Their most recent worth talking about victory was the Laker game AND they barely beat them without Kobe! The C’s are not an elite team right now, PERIOD. Honestly, they will have to fight and play well to get out of the first round and then I wouldn’t expect much more. Worse of all, this summer offers zero hope for drastic improvement. We won’t see any major upgrading for a couple of years.
probably right
I’m afraid you are right there, Wyc has flipped from being willing to pay to win to closing the checkbook and wanting to run the C’s like a business. Sports teams aren’t money makers they are hobbies for the rich. Not sure what Wyc thought was going to happen. He is relying on saying we won #17.
Agree
The banner was well worth it, but Ainge should or could have started retooling at the deadline. He was quoted as saying he wasn’t going to allow this C’s team to drop off like the great 80’s club. But in order for him to do that he had to MOVE Ray, Scal, and TA. Expiring deals are golden for a club like the C’s looking to rejuvenate their roster.
Ainge said he would wait to see what happens this season
I think he was right.
you how we can win this? 2nd round should be Cavs-Magic!
but i dont know how Magic will be at 4th seed! thats the big question. will face hawks (which im sure we can eliminate) the most important thing is Cavs face Magic in the 2nd round cuz they dont have Shaq! thus LBJ will act as a child again!
huh
The Hawks own us right now! If we match up against the Hawks we are DONE for sure. We need to play Orlando. We match up better with them and give Howard problems when Sheed and Perk aren’t playing hide my head in my ass.
giving up?
Any educated C’s fan would know that by moving Ray they were attempting to get younger and avoid being handcuffed this summer. Plus, Ray would have come back to Boston this summer on the cheap.
Two years ago, Wyc's personal net worth was more than $300 million
Personally, I do not think he is hurting financially
huh
Do you have any idea what it costs to run a professional franchise? Their player payroll alone was over $70 million. Everyone has felt the financial downturn of our country and I’ve read Wyc is NO different. I don’t fault him for that, who are we to tell him how to spend his money? But, he is going to lose money for sure if this team does back in the dumps and can’t compete for a few years. You have to spend some money to make money and you can’t fall in love with guys and stay loyal and still stay elite as they age.
Do you have any idea how much they take in each year?
Do you know how much season tickets cost? What they get paid by the NBA for the network television games? How much they get for their local cable package? etc. etc. etc. They may lose money, but it won’t be a lot.
I am just saying that personally, Wyc is an extremely rich man. I don’t think he should put that money into the team, but I don’t think he is anywhere close to financially hurting.
agree
He isn’t “hurting” like the average person, but I will bet good money he has felt the down turn and that has impacted Celtic related decisions. That’s all I’m saying.
Maybe Pagliuca can kick in more of his money
According to the January 2010 issue of Boston Magazine, he is worth $410 million — Heh!
money
is only part of it, you have to be able to spend the money. This summer they don’t have the ability to go sign other key free agents or trade for well paid players because their cap situation is devoured by 6 guys!
GM skills
A elite GM has to be able to evaluate talent (Ainge does this well), work the cap (not sure Danny’s strength), and wheel and deal (Danny’s strength). It is a difficult task. Danny overall has drafted well the problem was that they were so good they couldn’t play the young guys. I think he is going to regret moving Bill Walker.
Ainge or Doc or both
One if not both are going to being in trouble this summer. With all that could potentially be going on with free agency, the C’s look stuck with what they have which means other teams will improve, the C’s will age, and then fall further down the NBA food chain. What is there to be excited about right now? What do we have to “hope” for?
Huh
It is about finances and talent. a lot of fans think only of the players. The owners and gm’s have to think of business and money. fact of life.
partially agree
Owners and GM’s have to look at everything! And you can’t allow your team to age and slip and expect the fan base to be patient when our patience was exhausted between banners 16 and 17.
why
Keeping the core together IF they were healthy and near the top of their game makes sense, keeping the core together because of loyalty and other reasons doesn’t show well with the educated fans that understand where this team is headed.
Ainge
I do feel for Danny because Sheed has NOT rewarded him or the team since arriving. He’s fallen in love with the 3, is out of shape, and is stellar D skills have diminished. Daniels has been hurt (no ones fault). No one should be surprised KG isn’t who he once was. Ray just relies on others around him playing well to be a real factor. Perk has been horrible this year! Rondo has continued to improve. Paul is breaking down, no question. This summer Danny did what I think we all thought he needed to do. It just hasn’t worked out and it isn’t his fault. And we don’t even know if it’s his fault he didn’t make a major retooling deadline deal because Wyc might have killed that.
Danny Shoulda traded for...
Danny shoulda traded TA, Scal and JR, for a Motivational Speaker , the Energizer Bunny & cash
Ainge
Danny is going to need to be very creative, lucky, and unorthodox in order to rejuvenate this franchise this summer, no question! I think that NO ONE on this roster is untouchable.
no doubt
I live in Sacramento and when the Maloofs gave Petrie free access to their money, the Kings were competitive. As soon as they closed the check book and Petrie had to really “GM”, they have fallen to pieces.
trades
Sometimes you have to package older players and bad contracts with younger players to move them. Danny knows that. I would NOT be surprised if this team looks completely different next year and they are on the same competitive level as say the Clippers, Bucks, Heat, etc.
They Were Beaten on the Road by a Better Team
No reason to be upset. The folks wearing the emerald green glasses will just rationalize this loss as they have all of the others. It’s all Sheed’s fault, or whichever player is the scapegoat du jour.
The fact is that this team is too old and tired to compete with the better teams. The window is closed. Deal with it.
by Brickowski on Mar 14, 2010 9:22 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
true that
Well said, which is why something should have been done with Ray’s deal at the deadline to start the rebuilding process while they held a valuable commodity. I’m not upset with where the C’s are in the standings or how they are playing. I’m upset that Ainge/Wyc didn’t start the rejuvenation process using Ray’s contract along with TA’s and Scal’s.
overall record
The C’s overall record is deceiving because it makes them look like a top 10 team and if you are really objective, I don’t think they consistently are. However, many of us expect (myself at times) them to perform like a top tier team. They just aren’t healthy or good enough right now. There is very little you can do when players age and start breaking down. Us Celtic fans know this well because we lost 2 key pieces that would have slowed down the aging of our 80’s team when Bias and then Reggie died. You have to infuse your core as it ages with younger up and coming players. This roster doesn’t have that. The only player you could argue fits that description is Rondo.
who would they get for ray...
Come on. Monta Ellis? Iguadala? Kevin Martin? Do you really think that a Monta Ellis and Rondo led team is going to win any titles? There is only a few guys that are really franchise worthy.
Danny should have traded
Danny should have traded TA’s expiring, Scal’s expiring & JR, for 2 Motivational Speakers, and an Energizer Bunny!
Agreed
And Hickson throwing up 3 or 4 straight rim-breakers was the only thing keeping us in it at the time.
Basketball Alzheimer's?
Again no mental effort from this team. They don’t seem to enjoy playing the game. They are totally incapable of making any type of consistent mental effort. Immediately after they tied theCavaliers in the third quarter they made two unforced turnovers. This has been the pattern all year. Doc’s “save the legs. no practice system” is a total failure. It just makes their bad habits worse.
I have had tickets to 16 home games this year. The team has lost eight of those games. Some of their wins have been almost as painful as losses. In the last Knicks game the starters came back in in the second quarter with a ten point lead and lost it all in barely over a minute. The fact that I enjoyed some of the 18 losses in a row in 2007 more than some of their wins this year tells you what my opinion of their true effort has been. Unfortunately I see only more of the same on the horizon for the forseeabe future and that is truly sad.
A little good news
Rondo’s FTs are getting better and better.
…..Since the All-Star break: 42/58 = 72.5%
…..Past 9 games: 33/43 = 76.7%
…..Past 5 games: 19/24 = 79.2%
…..Past 2 games: 6/6 = 100%
This is a big deal, especially if Rondo will need to take over some games in the playoffs. It seems we may not have to worry about his FTs anymore… a huge improvement over the early part of the season.
GREAT point
Was thinking this myself today as I felt confident watching him go to the line. That’s a HUGE piece for him to add to his game if we’re seeing evidence of a new normal. It should make him even more aggressive going to the basket.
by TheOutletPass on Mar 15, 2010 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah... searching with candles for a little good news
….cue Anne Murray….
Stick a fork in them. They are done.
Anyone who still believes that this team will win the chip this year ought to be committed to a psycho ward. I am a Celtic fan. KG’s nearing C Webb status, if you know what I mean. Once C Webb injured his knee, it was over. Hawks will beat this old team in the 1st round in 5 games.
It's not psychology. It's reality.
I admire your faith even though it’s misplaced.
it’s nice to think they could play at a consistently high level game after game, but we’ve been shown a body of evidence that this is NOT the same team it was even last year and they can’t do that. Observations bare it out, stats bare it out.
Im hopeful....but Im not confident
I would be more optimistic if doc:
called up some athletic d leaguers for 10day contracts to try and plug up that paint—-variajao just Oreb’d over 3 celtics in position—again!…..please
stop allowing the players to walk the ball up the court—-no urgency, no passion—-
let rondo and nate do what they do best: run and gun. this offense is boring. if the starters are too old to keep up, then bring em off the bench…and say it just to rest for the playoffs-
since none of that will ever happen….I’ll hold out hope that the team gets hot over the last 10 games of the season, and ride it to a tiltle.
malcontents....the lot of you
Soothsaying
None of us, so far as I know, can tell the future, so saying the team’s done is just as stupid as saying things will be okay in the playoffs. (Neither of which is as stupid as saying which trades Ainge should have made a month after the trade deadline.)
But I think some things are becoming clear: The Big 3—it feels quaint to call them that, doesn’t it?—have obviously declined, but they are playing pretty good basketball, on both ends. KG is looking spry and like he’s getting some attitude back; Ray’s shooting and facilitating well; PP played really nice defense and set up his teammates for good shots, though he needs to be more aggressive.
The problem, I think, is further down: Rondo and Perk just suck right now; they are both completely walking through the game, which is sad considering they are young and should be our energy guys. Sheed is one of the biggest wastes of space in basketball; I’m offended watching him play. Daniels is too inconsistent. Finley is washed up. The bright spots are Davis and Robinson. At this point, I wouldn’t mind if Davis took Perk’s minutes and Robinson took Rondo’s. Robinson is at least trying to play defense, which is more than you can say about Rondo most of the time, and if Rondo’s not going to be a real point guard anymore, then let’s have an offensive threat out there instead. Rondo and Perk are just voids.
paul trys to get agressive
then gets swatted at the rim, loses the dribble, or lacks athleticm getting shots off in the paint. Perk is a cog in the machine who’s productivity is linked to team collective productivity. rondo is a casualty of lack of offensive identity……….in other words, this doesnt look like a well coached team.—-doc rivers
malcontents....the lot of you
by dasandruler on Mar 15, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Whoa
I agreed with much of what you said, but….
- Paul was not good last night. He looked terrible, actually.
- Rondo does not suck. He’s been quite good. I can see, though, that there’s another gear he can go to in the playoffs.
- Quis has been pretty reliable.
- Fin is NOT washed up. He had ONE bad game.
KG is looking spry?
You have got to be kidding me….I respect my bros on this board but I will not allow this type of denial to go unchecked….What games are you watching?!
I agree with that statement
KG is looking excellent. Better in every game. Closing in on 100% of what he used to be before the injuries. We’re talking about his physical condition… not his shot falling, etc.
A long history of losing
Despite the championship in 2008 and the success over the past couple of years, the core of this team…. Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett have lost A LOT of games over the course of their careers. Boston and Minnesota suffered through many dreadful seasons.
My points is that I think losing is a bit too familiar to these guys. They’re used to it. Sometimes it looks like they just don’t believe they can win. Kind of what it felt like during all those lousy seasons. I thought the 2008 title put an end to all that, but we all remember how ugly that title run was in the early rounds.
My big fear is that losing just isn’t that big a deal with these guys. It’s in their DNA.
Celtics bashers.
There’s more Celtics bashers than rain…Those 17 NBA championships really bother the backers of teams who have less championships…Let’s see now King James and the Cav’s have won..ZERO
by Celtics9Lakers2 on Mar 15, 2010 3:55 PM EDT reply actions

by 



























