Marquis Daniels Re-Asserts Himself
He appears to be a quiet and unassuming guy off the court, but Marquis Daniels can't afford to let that personality define his play on the court. In the six games prior to last night's thrashing of the Detroit Pistons, Daniels had tallied just 17 points, two assists, two rebounds, six turnovers, and nine personal fouls, prompting Doc Rivers to pronounce before last night's game that Daniels "has to play better - point blank."
Daniels obliged, scoring 11 points, grabbing five rebounds, handing out four of the team's 34 assists, while blocking one shot and committing just one turnover against Detroit. It was the type of well-rounded and assertive performance that the Celtics both expect and need out of Daniels. For, despite him being something of a stabilizer of sorts for the second unit - given he can help in a variety of areas - he can't be a guy who sits back and observes what his bench mates are doing, like a camp counselor watching the kids run around. He needs to be involved in as much of the action as the other four guys around him, for he's a player who's quite capable of making good things happen for both himself and his teammates.
What was most noticeable last night was not necessarily any one statistical category. His points were spread out over the course of the game, and his rebounds and assists were not of the flashy type, so one watching without the utmost intensity might not have even noticed them. However, even the most casual of observers of last night's game had to notice how often Daniels had his hands on the basketball, and how often his involvement seemed to result in something positive for the Celtics.
His offense was as diverse as ever, as he scored on a mashup of slashing layups, sleek spin moves, "tweener" shots in the paint, and the one jumper from the right wing with 2:26 left in the third. His jumper continues to be one of the few weak spots of his game, but he more than makes up for it by conducting the majority of his offense within 10 feet of the basket. The "tweener" shot - the short fading jumper from about five to eight feet from the hoop - is one of his most lethal weapons, and he knows how to utilize it well.
Daniels' production was most noticeable in the first half, when an efficient Paul Pierce found himself stricken with three fouls. One of his signature moments came with 1:57 left in the first quarter, when he lost the ball off a Rondo steal, went sprinting towards the baseline, saved the ball to Ray Allen, crashed into the front row, recovered, got back in play, got the ball back from Ray, and then found a cutting Rasheed Wallace for a wide open dunk and a 27-11 lead. It's that type of energy and aggressiveness that accounts for much of Daniels' success. When you see his hair bouncing up and down as he's bounding all around the floor, you know he's trying to make things happen. When the hair just hangs there, motionless, he's not doing his job.
Last night the hair was bouncing. And bouncing. And bouncing. And bouncing. And the Celtics were a better team because of it.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
marquis: another by product of poor coaching
doc needs to critisize himself first. this team has no offensive identity.
malcontents....the lot of you
what does that even mean?
I’m not disagreeing – I just don’t know what that statement means.
nope---not an argument
while doc certaintly isnt the worst coach in the league—-his adjustments to and understanding of the current version of C’Z , the rotations, the fouth quarter offense, and over reliance on the big 3 to the point of probably decreasing their health and effectiveness——leave a lot to be desired. did marquis respond to criticism….or did the coaching staff put him in a better position to be successful. I believe its the latter.
malcontents....the lot of you
I love Marquis' quiet energy.
And I love his “bouncing” hair… lol. Good post. And I love the way he changes the game (in a sneaky kind of way) so if your are not watcing him you don’t notice, and if you are watching him you can’t understand why no one else seems to notice…He is an oxymoron…obviously unobtrusive.
Glad you liked it, thirstyboots
I agree. He’s a unique player in terms of how he produces on the court. It’s like you’ll casually glance at the box score and be shocked to see he’s produced in so many different areas.
Does he have small hands?
I notice he often times has a hard time holding onto the ball when it is first passed to him.
Could still be the thumb
He’s only been back a month and those things take a long, long time to heal. Hand tendon injuries (ones that don’t even require surgury) can take up to 3-4 months to heal. I injured my hand in a car accident and it hurt for 3 months and it was minor in comparison.
I am sure Marquis...
… has set backs with the thumb during games, practices and just daily activity. As you know from experience (me too) it’s a real tough injury to heal; just doing simple everyday activities such as removing money from your pocket can set you back two weeks.
Mr. Payne
another good read….IowaGuy is absolutely right…I gotta think that Q mentaly winces everytime the ball is thrown to him, even if there is no real pain…and Doc was right to wait until Q was back in game shape before he decided to “encourage” him (and he did so with a man that he knew would react positively to a challange)…
Thanks Fastbreak1
You know, so many people gush over Kobe Bryant playing with those injured fingers…I’d bet next to anything that if he had a significant thumb injury like Daniels, or Shaq, or Baby had, he wouldn’t be playing with it. Thumbs are definitely a tricky business.
Why
Why doesn’t Anderson Varejao need that kick? Why doesn’t Jamal Crawford need that kick? Go down our roster and you can see each guy (except Big Baby and Ray I would say) who has needed that kick. We don’t own this problem. Ben Gordon needs a real kick. But Doc is too soft on his veterans. He’s not a screamer and he never will be and that is fine.
Imagine
if Anderson Varejao and Jason Maxiell were on this team as opposed to Shelden Williams and Rasheed Wallace. Oh, man. Sorry, just some wishful thinking.
the year we made The Trade, I wanted Noah. having Noah now instead of Sheed(who I thought would be fine) I can dream.
I think the idea that we MUST have REAL hustle big guys has stuck with the blog members. AJ takes it to a different level and is obviously quite skilled. Baby tries he’s just not long enough but Baby AND AJ would just wreak havoc out there!
Just imagine the possibilties
I can’t speak for in past decades, because I’m only 20, but I get the feeling that these hustle guys are becoming more and more prevalent and basically vital in today’s game.
the thing is that back in the day, the celtics would have had Chaney, Kuberski, Cowens, Silas and Havlicek on the squad and these guys were ALL relentless in the way KG used to be relentless. So back then your stars were rugged but you would have a physical bench guy. The Bullets had Unseld, of course later Detroit had an entire team of modestly skilled work horses. So its nothing new imho. Cliff Ray was a hustler. Norm Van Lier and Jerry Sloan…..
Marquis is one of my favorite players to watch this season
and definitely the “best new Celtic” award winner!
He was in a slump for quite some games but it was nice to see him get back to life last night. I think he will keep up this level of play.
I really love his game and I like his demenanor.
Doc!!!
Ur such a baby stop cring and coach for once geeze!!
by celtsfan1 on Mar 16, 2010 4:58 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
For, despite him being something of a stabilizer of sorts for the second unit
Is Marquis Daniels still a key glue guy for the bench performing well? A guy who helps bring together the other pieces and makes them more effective?
I thought he was earlier this season but I’m not sure that is still the case. Not since Nate Robinson joined the team. Nate has had his hands on the ball a lot more than House did and I haven’t seen Marquis have that same effect as he had earlier in the season.
I was glad to see..
Marquis answer Doc’s challenge.
Now if he would only get everyone else to step it up…..
His problem
Is that he isn’t Posey- Posey had the perfect style to come in and play against LeBron. Daniels might be a good player but against the Cavs his D is as bad as anyone elses.
I think his D is a work in progress
You’re right, he’s not Posey, but he has the potential to be a slashing version of Posey. He’s not got the bulk to handle Lebron, but really, who has? Posey was ok against Lebron in short bursts, but that was about it. Pierce was and is the only I guy who really slows Lebron down at all.
Here’s the thing I see about Daniels (and also Finley) that is going to be very useful for this team. Both those guys are TALL and use their height very effectively. Daniels by posting up smaller guards and Finley because he is still able to get his shot off in a lot of situations. Finley’s shooting is very important for the 2nd unit, because unlike Tony Allen, he can’t be doubled off. With Finley in there, every guy can shoot with range!
The way the season is panning out, there is a good chance we get Cleveland if we make it to the 2nd round. One of their few weaknesses IMO is their lack of size in th backcourt – only Parker has any height. So I think we can take advantage of that to help get our second unit easy looks. Think the play the Celtics run to get Pierce mismatched against an opposing guard at the top of the key and do the same with Daniels. If he is surrounded by shooters who can’t be doubled off, I reckon he should be able to have a field day against Mo and West.
by Celticsbloke on Mar 19, 2010 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















