Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Celtics’ New Paradigm: Learn By Playing Smart, Not Hard

Some say the Celtics have one more month to "get it right", to show us and the world that they can focus, play hard, and win games convincingly, against good teams. But playing hard is not the object. Nothing useful is learned by scrambling around like Sideshow Bob in order to eke out one more meaningless win.

I believe the Celtics have come up with a new paradigm for the NBA and winning the championship. They didn’t plan it. They didn’t sit down and DECIDE to follow it. It just... happened. Naturally. It grew from the ground up – just a thought at first – until it ended up taking over the team. By now, it has become a full-blown paradigm: the set of principles by which they live.

But if you ask any of them about it, they will look at you like you’re nuts and will not know what you’re talking about. Most of the Celtics don’t really know about this new paradigm, amazingly enough. But it has happened. Here’s how.

The Seed Arrives

It started with an idea, a seed... carried into the Cs’ locker room by Rasheed Wallace. Sheed naturally believes and lives the concept that the regular season is one boring, silly, overlong waste of time. He lives for the playoffs. Whether he knows it or not, this concept has a strong basis in reality:

Star-divide

(1) The regular season is much too long and hard – a grueling, dangerous journey at the end of which... there is almost no payoff. All this fighting, spanning six months and 82 games, is for home court advantage only. Nobody gives you a ring for a good regular season record. So how much is HCA worth? Not much, as it turns out. Because if you’re good enough to win a championship, you must be good enough to win on the road. One, just ONE extra game at home, as opposed to on the road, in a seven-game series, is simply, relatively, virtually meaningless. So why does the regular season exist? To earn money for the NBA, of course. And as practice for the playoffs. But months of planning plus 10-12 games of practice should be more than enough for most good teams; it’s certainly enough for a team whose core has been together for almost 3 years now, and whose key additions are smart, wily vets.

(2) The regular season is when injuries happen. Often. That’s its greatest risk, by far. And it is a truth universally acknowledged that healthy teams win playoffs. The healthiest team wins it all. Therefore, the fewer injuries a team suffers in the regular season, the higher are that team’s chances of winning in the playoffs. The Celtics learned that bitter lesson last year.

(3) The time a player spends playing on the court is directly proportional to that player’s risk of injury. That’s obviously a 1-1 correspondence – you can’t get injured if you don’t play; if you do play, each minute brings with it a minute’s worth of risk. Cut a player’s PT in half, and you halve his risk of injury. Double it, and you double his risk. Etc.

(4) The intensity with which a player plays is also proportional to that player’s risk of injury. The harder a player plays, the more likely it is that he will be injured at some point.

(5) Now let’s add it all up. To maximize a team’s chances of winning in the playoffs, that team should minimize its injuries. The most direct way to minimize injuries to your best players is to have them play fewer total minutes (per game, and/or with long "injury" times off). Another way is to instruct players not to take unnecessary chances, i.e., don’t take charges, don’t jump when in a crowd of other players, don’t fight TOO hard in the game, etc. What does all that add up to? It adds up to the way the Celtics have been playing this season!

Players And Thermostats: How The Seed Became A Paradigm

Let’s get back to the seed. Sheed brought this attitude with him to Boston. He’s a friendly, talkative guy, and his ideas quickly became familiar to the whole team. He didn’t preach. He didn’t try to convert anybody. He just likes to talk.

But because his concepts about the regular season are so rooted in logic, because they have the ring of truth, they flourished in the Celtics’ locker room. Guys naturally absorbed it, in part because they've been through the whole process before. But if you asked them about it, they wouldn’t know what you were talking about. The whole thing happened under the surface, unbeknownst even to the players themselves.

Now they’re in a game. The guys play hard right from tipoff. They build a good lead by halftime. The other team is playing hard too, but hasn’t really challenged yet. Then comes the 2nd half, and the other team challenges. They go on a run, they change their defensive strategy, etc. Faced with this challenge, how do the Cs respond? The key moment has arrived.

As they play, the Celtics feel the challenge, and they look inside themselves. They check their THERMOSTATS. What temperature am I set at? Is this life-and-death time? Should I burn all-out with my response, giving it my absolute best? Or do I just do what I can without going overboard? So far in this regular season – the answer has almost always been the latter. The Celtics do the best they can without trying too hard.

Why? Because the seed has been planted in their minds. When they go to check their thermostats, they find them set to medium, because the logic for that is irrefutable. If they play too hard or too long, they are more likely to get injured. If they get injured, the team is doomed. Therefore, the thermostat says to them – DON’T PLAY TOO HARD. Play well enough to win most games, but not well enough to beat very determined and/or lucky teams (and/or unfriendly refs).

And that’s how a new paradigm takes hold. Not by conscious planning, but naturally, by osmosis. A gradual internal reprogramming that creeps up on a team. And it’s real. Real enough to directly affect the outcomes of regular season games.

Now, for the most important point of all: This kind of internal paradigm DISAPPEARS when the playoffs begin. Because its entire logic revolves around the concept of preserving the team’s health for the playoffs. When the players go to check their thermostats in the playoffs, they find they’re all set to maximum.

Why don’t all NBA teams do this?

Good question.

(a) – Most NBA teams cannot be sure of making the playoffs until very late in the season. The entire Western Conference is so tightly packed, nobody can be sure of anything. There are perhaps 4 teams in the East that can be certain of making the playoffs. Of those, the only team which also happens to be in the EC’s weakest Division – making their playoff appearance a virtual certainty, given ANY level of reasonable regular season play – is the Celtics.

Note that once teams get locked into making the playoffs, they usually adopt this paradigm naturally. They let their stars rest, they don’t care if they lose games, they guard their health most zealously, etc. This is further proof of the validity of the paradigm... IF you're sure of making the playoffs.

(b) The Celtics are loaded with vets. Older players are more susceptible to injury. Protection of their players from injury is arguably MORE IMPORTANT to the Celtics than to most other teams.

(c) – You need a seed. Our seed was carried in by Sheed. The other teams for whom this idea makes some sense apparently do not have their version of Sheed’s Seed.

Bottom Line

The Celtics’ new paradigm is actually a very logical approach to the regular season, for this team. It was not a conscious decision, made purposefully, but it’s very real. Yes, it’s an end run around the whole capitalist structure of the NBA. No, nobody else is doing this now.

But are they really following a "new paradigm", or do they just plain suck? Ah... that we cannot know with certainty. I can only say that logically, their approach is the correct one. And most correct of all..... (gulp)..... is Sheed, because besides carrying the original seed (unknowingly, I believe) he’s the one who is MOST saving himself for the playoffs – by not crashing the boards, avoiding charges, not setting himself in the post where crowds gather and injuries are likeliest, not pushing his body too far, etc. I.e., by playing the way we hate to see him play.

But... it appears that it’s Sheed who has it right regarding the regular season. So the next time you see him being "lazy", think: maybe it’s because he doesn’t want to get injured fighting for one more meaningless rebound, or taking one more meaningless charge, in a meaningless game in the meaningless regular season. (Though now that the regular season is ending, he is going to have to step it up... these last games are the necessary practice noted above.)

I know some of you are going to say: "Nonsense (or some choice word(s) to that effect). The Cs suck, and THAT’S why they’ve been losing." Well... maybe. But they’ve also been winning. Blowing teams out, even. They’ve shown us that they can be great. If they can be great, the best explanation for their overall play this season is this new paradigm. It's unavoidable. They're not fighting for every regular season game because these games don't matter, and because doing so raises their risk of injury... the inescapable logic of the paradigm.

I believe the Celtics require two factors to win the championship in 2010. #1 - They need to be healthy in the playoffs. #2 - They need to play their game correctly. With those two factors in place, there is no team in the world they cannot beat.

If they continue on their current course, they will be minimizing their risk of injury, thereby maximizing factor #1. They will use the time remaining to accomplish #2 – and they need this time, because so far this season, they’ve had only a few games with a full healthy roster.

But is it important that they win as many games as possible between now and the playoffs? No. Should they go ALL OUT to perform at their top level now? No – that would needlessly increase their risk of injury. THE CELTICS DO NOT NEED TO PLAY HARD, THEY NEED TO PLAY SMART. They must learn how to play together as one healthy, complete unit (for a change). And they must get every player to understand the game plan and his role in it. When that happens, and it will soon, they’ll be ready for the playoffs.

The playoffs. That's when the new paradigm goes out the window. When all thermostats get set to MAX. And when the Celtics intend to win no more, and no less, than 16 games. And a few more rings.

Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.

Comment 40 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I believe what you're saying

Why? It’s because I’m seeing one unmistakeable characteristic unfold right in front of my (and your!) eyes.

The Celtics are finally again playing “SMART BALL”. Even a team such as this one that is saving energy for the playoffs, is capable of blowing teams out with well-executed offense. The beautiful thing about it is that this offense is smooth, and it requires relatively less energy. This style of play is great for a vet team such as the Celtics, and the very fact that they are playing like this (exactly as they did during their early season 23-5 stretch) tells me that they have officially overcome injuries and have only BEGUN to start playing like a team again.

What’s even more beautiful is this: Not only is this style of play less brutal and less prone to injure players, but it is also the BEST style of play for these players. It is how the team won in 2008 (i.e. balanced attack, pick your poison, high assists, drive and kick, simultaneous inside-mid-range-outside threat, constant passing and ball movement-based offense). It is how they will win against the so called “2010 NBA champs Cavs”.

This team lost key players, so it is no wonder that they lost their brainy style of offense. This offense requires everbody, and now everybody is back! With 16 games against mostly +.500 competition, the smart play will only become more consistent.

It may not be intentional, but the Celtics probably ARE holding back. This team cannot win by playing more athletically than their competition. They win by playing smart, and until they are able to execute that style of offense and defense, they should not risk injury. That is why they lose games they normally should win. In other words, when the “smart play” degrades in the 3rd quarter of a tied game, the Celtics try to find the smart play, rather than dig in for extra hustle. Personally, I’d rather have them keep making the same mistakes (rather than risk injury in fruitless hustle) as long as they are trying to perfect their ball movement AND rythym for the Big 3.

The good news is that they finally have refound this offense, and it will only strengthen in the near future. When the playoffs come around, watch out. That smart play will combine with high intensity (for the first time since Fall).

Ashtray Bouquet

by ducksawce on Mar 16, 2010 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Very true

I agree. Until they do some damage out west on the next road trip, I definitely won’t sit comfortably. However, even the (minor) stepping stone of blowing out lower competition (more consistently at least) hasn’t happened in months. THIS is what good teams do. You know how everybody complains about how the Celtics should beat teams like these down?….they get angry when they don’t….yet when they actually do this, some people belittle it. Blowing teams out like this IS a sign of good things.

The prediction (or hope) is that this will translate into 5-10 pt wins against upper-mid teams (Spurs, Jazz), and close, competitive games against the elites (Mavs, Cavs). The key is they have to do it consistenly. I don’t care whether the C’s are playing the Nets or the Cavs….if they move the ball like they did yesterday, they will win…simple as that. Even tough defenses have a tough time against rapid ball movement…just look at the Magic at their best, or Lebron when he passes well.

Ashtray Bouquet

by ducksawce on Mar 16, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like your thoughts

You ran with the “smart” play thing… I like it a lot. Sounds exactly right.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

This line of thinking is likely the most ludicrous I have seen/heard/read in a long time

But, it does lend more rationalization to those who either believe or are trying to make themselves believe that the Celtics are going to with the championship and that they wittingly or unwittingly have some sort of master plan to be in perfect position to do it when the playoffs start. Much of this stuff reminds me of the conspiracy theories that abound in the U.S over things such as the Kennedy Assasination.

by vinnie on Mar 16, 2010 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

There you have it, folks...

Lakers, Cavs, Nuggets, Magic might as well surrender right now!

by Title 18 on Mar 16, 2010 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Feels like wishful thinking

The paradigm shift that has REALLY taken place this year is the Celtics have gone from one of the top 3 teams in the league to around the 8-10th best team in the league.

You can’t rationalize away the decline in individual players performances (see the stats), the Celtics inability to beat elite teams, the worst-in-class rebounding, etc. These are all clear signs of the team getting worse. It’s not underperforming – it’s the new reality.

by TheOutletPass on Mar 16, 2010 2:55 PM EDT reply actions  

We don't know yet

We will find out soon. They will have to play smarter than everybody else. But also, they WILL have to dig deeper at some points and also play tougher.

Can’t CONCLUDE now that they’re not good enough. We’ll see.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, I can't conclude it definitively

But all the evidence points to it.

That said, come playoff game 1, I’ll be, as I am with every game, totally emotionally invested in the chance things will turn.

by TheOutletPass on Mar 16, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

The next time I get totally fed up

…with something, or somebody (like Sheed!) on this team, it’ll be your job to pull me back from the ledge.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure...

Run the advanced stats on the big three. ORR, DRR, PER, %Ast, etc. The trends are clear – these guys are in decline. Alarming in particular with PP and KG who are the two most important players on this team.

by TheOutletPass on Mar 16, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

One small point to interject

Paul is not even close to Rondo in importance to this team. Put it this way: they can still win without Paul… there are competent replacements sitting on the bench. If Rondo should ever go down (heaven forbid), it’ll be sayonara 2010.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting debate

Is a full-strength PP more important to the C’s than Rondo?

I tend toward PP for his ability (when right) to manufacture a good shot, defend at a very high level (including LBJ) and get to the line. I know it’s fashionable to say Rondo’s more important but I’m not sold on that yet.

by TheOutletPass on Mar 16, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

well, I think you have to be a little more specific

Its hard to ignore the decline in aggregates – which are symptomatic of time missed and some games playing while hindered. If we accept that injuries are part of the decline, then yeah, that’s decline.

But if you do isolate to stretches of healthy play and look at rates, the numbers look a lot better. Here are KG’s ‘advanced stats’ the last three years:


Season Age G MP PER TS% eFG% ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV%
2007-08 31 71 2328 25.3 .588 .539 7.3 25.1 16.8 19.9 2.3 3.1 10.8
2008-09 32 57 1772 21.2 .563 .532 5.6 26.7 16.6 14.7 1.9 3.1 10.1
2009-10 33 55 1642 19.8 .583 .536 4.7 25.4 15.4 16.2 1.8 2.3 11.3
Career 1110 41277 23.7 .548 .502 8.1 25.6 17.1 20.3 1.9 3.2 11.8


Season Age G AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% ORtg DRtg
2007-08 31 71 19.9 2.3 3.1 10.8 25.5 118 94
2008-09 32 57 14.7 1.9 3.1 10.1 23.4 112 98
2009-10 33 55 16.2 1.8 2.3 11.3 21.6 113 99
Career 1110 20.3 1.9 3.2 11.8 25.3 111 99

Yes, a clear ‘decline’ in PER and Usage – though those are related. He’s clearly taking fewer shots per minute this year as they are not funneling as much of the offense through KG. Heck, the Celtics as a TEAM are not taking very many shots per game so that affects that.

On the other hand, note that the stats that relate to how his legs feel – shooting percentages and defensive rebound percentages – are actually completely comparable to 2007-2008. And those rates include numerous games where we know he still wasn’t feeling well.

The Offensive Rating (ORtg) is down because the whole team’s offensive efficiency is down. Defensively, his rating is up, but that’s true of the entire league. KG is still one of the very few players on any of the major contending teams to have a sub-100 defensive rating. Perk is another and there are very very few others. Those two guys are ranked in the top-5 in that category.

I guess what I would say that, yeah, KG is almost certainly ‘in decline’ in that he’s not getting any younger. But I think if you look closely, while he’s healthy he is still one of the dominant players at his position. Compare his numbers to his career numbers. I’m especially encouraged by his DRB%.

I don’t want to flood folks with similar breakdowns of both Pierce and Ray. Ray is actually having a VERY good year. Not shooting career highs in 3PT% like last year. But in TS% & eFG% in particular and in many stat categories, he is actually playing as well as he has since coming to the Celtics and slightly better than he did in 2007-2008. Yes, his PER is also down – again because he’s taking fewer shots per game – the whole TEAM is taking fewer shots per game though (fewest in the NBA).

I really see no signs of decline in Ray’s game yet.

Pierce is the tough one. His game has been both unbelievably good (especially last fall) and really really bad (a few select games this late winter …). His shooting percentages are basically at career highs. But so is his TOV%. And his rebounding efficiencies are down slightly. So he’s clearly been struggling to be consistent.

Pierce is the youngest of the three – only 32. I don’t think his ‘game’ is yet in decline – but he’s had the most trouble completely shaking the negative effects of his injuries this year. Is that age-related? Hard to say. His injuries have been sort of freakish – stray knee infection, getting his foot rolled on, wacking his thumb. Age? Bad luck?

Pierce’s game is probably the most measured by the number of shots he takes because he initiates his own offense more than anyone on the team. His shots per 36 dropped way down from what it was last fall when he was ‘feeling good’. Lately it is creeping back up. Hopefully he’ll be back up to taking 18ish shots per game by the time the playoffs get here.

My take – I look at the details and I think that there is still a lot of gas in the tank for the big 3. But like anyone, they have to be healthy.

by mmmmm on Mar 17, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

It explains everything

…which otherwise is very hard to understand. They came out with a determination last night that was not very different from how they came out in the Memphis game. Both were blowouts, in reverse of each other. And as you know, we’ve had several examples like this.

If this attitude is not true, and they really VALUE the regular season, how do these things happen? You gonna tell me that Memphis is soooo much better than Detroit? No, they just seem to have a LIMIT to how hard they’re willing to work in most games. Where does this limit come from?

And WHY SHOULD they care about the regular season? Somebody explain this to me. Vinnie, OutletPass, Title18 (a sarcastic name if ever I saw one!)… tell me why the Celtics should care about these remaining 16 games.

If you can’t, just extend the question to the whole season. After their strong start, they were effectively assured a playoff spot, being in the Atlantic Division. If your team has that knowledge, tell me WHY THEY SHOULD CARE ANYMORE… about winning tough games in the regular season?

The Cavs seem to. Why? (They don’t seem to worry about their players getting injured. They don’t have the vets. Their superstar has to keep proving how super he is.)

Other than their fans, the only motive I can think of is pride. How long can pride last facing the other realities? Injuries. Blind refs. Opponents who’re absolutely determined to beat the hell out of you. Vets in various stages of injury recovery. Remember, most teams we face are playing for their playoff lives, we’re not.

Bottom line – why should the Celtics care? You think they do. Explain it.

(Btw – the piece is long because I had to explain how this attitude started. Didn’t like the idea that it was all premeditated… too conspiratorial. And – how is this an “excuse”? It’s an explanation.)

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 4:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Pretty big quibble

You wrote: “No, they just seem to have a LIMIT to how hard they’re willing to work in most games. Where does this limit come from?”

It’s not how hard they’re willing to work. It’s how hard they’re capable of working. It’s not hard to understand AT ALL. It’s age and decline.

by TheOutletPass on Mar 16, 2010 4:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Logic

The limit question was preceded by the blowout story. The fact that they blow teams out – convincingly, I should add – argues against the age-and-decline explanation. No, it seems more like they have a limit on how hard they TRY… not on their ability to perform.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just curious

How many teams have they blown out convincingly this season?

by vinnie on Mar 16, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since they became whole again,

…2 or 3 (depending on how you count Philly). Out of some 15 or so games. Altogether this season, it’s happened about 10 times.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is some of the funniest stuff on the InterWeb(s)

I love the theories being thrown around to justify the fact that the Celtics can’t beat good teams anymore. It’s because they really don’t want nor don’t have to beat them.

by vinnie on Mar 16, 2010 6:46 PM EDT reply actions  

One last thought/question

Do you think the Celts’ goal should be to lose enough games and maybe get the 5th or 6th seed? After all, none of this matters since they are so good and powerful that no one will be able to beat them come playoff time. They just need to be smart, right, and that should be easy.

by vinnie on Mar 16, 2010 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes

But you miss the point. They’re NOT planning this. They just play ball. They play at a reasonable level, reasonable enough so that they can LEARN how to optimize their game, and play SMARTER and BETTER than everyone else. They lose some, they win more. No one is sitting there plotting a graph and determining how many games they should lose.

But theoretically – which is a different thing – the correct thing is to come in 8th. Preserve all your health and energy for the part of the season that matters, and maximally minimize your risks of injury. One problem with going that far is in the fans. They won’t let you. So the team must find a balance. Versus Memphis, they went too far out on the beam, upsetting the balance – and the fans reminded them of it.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

So how did this paradigm work for Sheed in Detroit?

It started with an idea, a seed… carried into the Cs’ locker room by Rasheed Wallace. Sheed naturally believes and lives the concept that the regular season is one boring, silly, overlong waste of time. He lives for the playoffs. Whether he knows it or not, this concept has a strong basis in reality:

by vinnie on Mar 16, 2010 6:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Can't answer that

I just know he phoned it in his last year there. Probably because he realized they had no chance.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

As planter of your seed, Rasheed has demonstrated an interesting adherence to this paradigm,

in which, over the breadth of his career, his per-game playoff production has been nearly exactly the same as his regular season production in terms of counting stats (points-rebounds-assists being the most prominent), despite the fact that he averages a couple more minutes per game in the playoffs.

And his scoring efficiency (measured best by true shooting) and rebounding (measured best by rebound rate) have suffered slight declines in the postseason compared to his regular season figures.

Alas, it’s harder to measure defensive contributions statistically, and that’s where Rasheed can really be a difference-maker, so perhaps he’ll start playing hard in the playoffs and we’ll see a major difference there. Interestingly, while I’m not as well-versed in its computation and do not put this last statistic forth as a definitive measure, one of the few attempted measures of defensive contributions out there is individual defensive rating (see basketball-reference), of which Rasheed’s is exactly the same in the regular season and playoffs.

None of this is especially surprising. By and large, as the fine fellows at Fire Joe Morgan liked to remind us once upon a time, the best players…are the best players.

-sw

Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.

Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw

by Steve Weinman on Mar 16, 2010 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Ah, but he wasn't born with these thoughts

They come over time. I don’t know his history very well, and I’m NOT gonna take the time to learn it (I wanna preserve my brain cells for the second season). I know he tanked his last year in Detroit, probably because they had no shot. It’s quite possible that this attitude developed only then… as he hit 35… which would mean that all his playoff stats are pre-paradigm-attitude, and useless in that sense.

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you're telling me the attitude might not have developed until after last year,

after his team’s mediocre regular season led to an awful (and short-lived) postseason.

But he had it before he came to town because…

Let’s get back to the seed. Sheed brought this attitude with him to Boston

I’m not really sure I get it. Or if I really want to, in fact, ‘get it.’

If memory serves, this was also the guy talking about the regular-season wins record at year’s start.

-sw

Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.

Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw

by Steve Weinman on Mar 16, 2010 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why not?

It had to develop sometime. Besides, it’s not a hard opinion… more of an attitude, that spread.

Yes, he did, when asked about the Cs’ record, agree with the questioner that they could challenge the Bulls, bla, bla, bla. It’s not like he knew his own mind. He has the attitude… he’s said as much by now… but if you asked him last summer, he probably wouldn’t have admitted it, might not have even known about it yet.

I identify him as the seed because he’s the biggest major change, and the only one who has admitted to believing what he does about the regular season vs. the playoffs (when the “big boy shots” happen).

by DRJ1 on Mar 16, 2010 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

gotta caveate the counting stats in the playoffs v regular season comparison

Not only is the sample size smaller, but the playoffs are against better teams – particularly on defense.

But overall, I personally doubt there is any ‘seed’ here. I agree with you – I don’t really think Sheed has a philosophy of saving it for the end game.

I think the team has just been playing as well as it can throughout this year – that includes Sheed – given the circumstances they’ve found themselves in. They stumbled through some injuries that had people playing in roles they probably are not best in. Now they are getting better. The roles are settling down. I don’t think it is more subtle or complicated than that.

by mmmmm on Mar 17, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

That not pushing too hard in the regular season makes sense for this team. And I do think the Celtics have been deliberately playing with a little less intensity at times this season. The problem I have with the strategy is two-fold:
1) As Russell and co knew, having a psychological advantage over your rivals is important. We no longer have that edge over any good teams.
2) Basketball is a high speed game and requires automatic reactions. You have to ‘train’ your body to react in certain ways so it responds instinctively if you want to have that ‘edge’ in a game – the difference between getting a rebound, a loose ball, etc. You haven’t got time to think “is this worth chasing”? If you get your body used to holding back in those 50/50 situations then pretty soon it becomes habit and can be hard to break.

I think that with the injuries we’ve had, there isn’t much choice but to adopt this strategy (at least for KG and Pierce) but there are some serious risks to not playing as hard as you can. We’ll see what happens in the coming month! Hopefully the Celtics will be the biggest pool sharks in history!

by Celticsbloke on Mar 16, 2010 10:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Most teams do this

Lakers, Cavs, Magic, Spurs, Mavs, Jazz and Nugs are all taking it easy(er) in the regular season. I think all these teams consider themselves contenders. The only team that plays hard all the time (out of the self described contenders) would be the Hawks.
The 86 Celtics took it easy during the regular season and then stepped it up in the playoffs. Almost all contending teams do this all the time.
The only thing you could say for the C’s is that they look like they are taking it even easier than the other "take it easy" teams.

by Scal4theallstargame on Mar 16, 2010 11:09 PM EDT reply actions  

The 1986-86 Celtics were 67-15

Yep — they really took it easy on their way to the championship that year. All of this taking it easy/coasting stuff is a myth.

by vinnie on Mar 17, 2010 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with the concept of playing smart not hard.

BUT it doesn’t guarantee us of success in the playoffs.

**I just would like to say that indeed, playing hard has consequences. Kevin Garnett played hard all his career, and look at him now. And even the legend Larry Bird played very hard during his time, and he suffered the consequences late in his career.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

Yes, intimidation is the key to domination.

by Marjun Raposon on Mar 17, 2010 7:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Not even past the first round

Especially now that lesser team doesn’t fear us anymore. For us its either Charlotte, Miami or Milwaukee in the playoffs. If i get the chance to pick, I’d pick the Bobcats, since we own them.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

Yes, intimidation is the key to domination.

by Marjun Raposon on Mar 17, 2010 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like that.

You can see it in their past two games….the key? make some extra pass to create a higher percentage shots.

by celticz on Mar 18, 2010 12:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Where should Rondo be ranked???
Small
How the Celtics can win this year
Small
Trading For Nash and Gortat
Small
If Jeremy Lin is the real deal, can we get Him?
Small
What does the C's immediately need now, 2 months before the playoffs?
Kevin_garnett_small
Rondo trade won't hurt Celtics no more.
Small
Exposed...was rondo ever an asset
Small
Not yet convinced??...
Small
Enough is enough, I finally have to admit it. Rondo cannot carry this team to the future.
I_want_to_believe_small
Thoughts on the Lakers loss

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi