Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Veterans Share Their Favorite Sports Memories

Cleveland, Check. On to Orlando!

The Celtics did what many said they wouldn't- what many said they couldn't. They eliminated the Cavaliers in six games to move on to the Eastern Conference Finals, winning 94-85.

It was a sight that nobody thought they'd see just a few weeks ago, but this certainly is not the same inconsistent team that played 82 games during the regular season. This is exactly why a team like the Cavs, the number one seed in the East, could not stop them.

"One thing we don't lack is confidence," said Kevin Garnett after the game. "Even when we were playing like crap and trying to get our chemistry problems together and our locker room and all the things that come with the season. I thought we hit our stride at the right time, you know."

Garnett looked like the Kevin Garnett of old tonight, scoring 22 points and grabbing 12 rebounds while abusing Shaquille O'Neal on the offensive end. The goal was to get the ball to Garnett as much as possible and exploit the mismatch between him and Antawn Jamison.

"The number was 20," said Doc Rivers about how many shot attempts they tried to get Garnett per night. "And our guys had a count on it. Everyone knew, everyone knew what they had to do in that way. Get (Garnett) space, get him room. The great thing about Kevin- they know he's not going to take a lot of bad shots. Even with the 20 number, he's going to make some good passes, which he did."

Star-divide

Rajon Rondo, whom most may consider the series MVP, finished with 21 points and 12 assists. While Mo Williams scored 20 points in the first half, Rondo held him to just two points in the second half on 1-8 shooting.

It was the type of Celtics defense that has given them success all postseason. They held the Cavs to just 38% from the field, and just 33% in the second half. Furthermore, the Cavs turned the ball over an astounding 22 times, including nine from James alone. It was a team effort tonight on both ends of the court, and the opposition is having a tough time figuring out how to manage competing against a roster that boasts so much talent.

"That's what makes us so strong," Paul Pierce said after scoring 11 of his 13 points in the second half. "When you do your scouting report on us, you have to worry about four, five, or six different guys night in and night out. A lot of great teams, they have one great player, when you look at Dwight Howard, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James. So a lot of our scouting report is going to be geared to the star players and then key in on other guys. I think with us you can't just key in on one guy, you can say I'm our leading scorer but you got four or five other guys that could be our leading scorer and it's not by much."

But this isn't where it ends for the Celtics. They didn't start the season in hopes to simply just make it past the Cavaliers and into the Eastern Conference Finals- they have bigger goals than that.

"I'm really not that proud of this truthfully because our goal was to win a championship," Pierce said. "We didn't say we wanted to come into this year and beat the Cleveland Cavaliers in the playoffs- our goal is a championship."

In order to do that, they will have to go through the Orlando Magic. The Magic have cruised through the first eight games of the playoffs, sweeping both the Bobcats and the Hawks easily. The Celtics were 1-3 against the Magic in the regular season, but that doesn't mean much when you consider that the regular season Celtics are nothing compared to the postseason Celtics.

"This is why I came here," said Rasheed Wallace after the game. "I didn't come here for the regular season. These last few games, we have been playing good. We just have to keep the chain rolling."

It appears as though Wallace is just one of the many Celtics players who didn't come for the regular season. They have, however, arrived for the postseason- let's hope they are the last to leave.

Comment 136 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Right here buddy;

http://espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2010/matchup/_/teams/celtics-magic

… someone please tell me why that image gets me all giddy, psyched up and pumping with adrenaline? Think my user-image + Perks scowl.

Let’s rock this place again, let’s remember them why we won the championship before. Let’s do it all again.

Next season baby, right before game 1 in the Garden, we’ll be stading. All of us. Saluting while we raise her.

No.18.

- Dirk van Boxtel, the wandering Celtic fan.
Twitter: @4Hoopz

by Kiorrik on May 14, 2010 3:41 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

They win the title this year and...

… I’m heading to Boston for the banner-raising next fall.

We should all go.

by TheOutletPass on May 14, 2010 3:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why is Rasheed in the match up with Lewis? Should be KG right?

by radiohead on May 14, 2010 4:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that makes no sense.

Rasheed is going to tag-team with Perk on Howard. Our 12 fouls to give versus his 6….

Maybe the Guys at ESPN are thinking this is still 2009 and we don’t have KG? But then why have ’Sheed? …. Oh – they think this is January, right!

It is worth what it is worth.

by mmmmm on May 14, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Id like to see Shelden thrown on Howard also for a bit of spot duty ...

So he can use his 6 fouls to rough him up a bit and maybe throw him off his game..

by fordescort on May 14, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, for spot duty, especially if Perk & Sheed get into early foul trouble.

Hopefully that won’t happen.

I am worried about how to spell KG. I don’t know what to think of BBD matched up against Lewis. If we time it so that KG is always out there when Lewis, it shouldn’t be a problem.

by mmmmm on May 14, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can not believe.....

the continued lack of disrespect that ESPN and its so called experts keep show the C’s which dates back to 2008.

C’mon ESPN you have more credibility then that…. or don’t you?

by fordescort on May 14, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I SEE..

A Boston win in 6 against Orlando.. A Boston win against the Lakers also in 6..

by BOOMBOOM on May 14, 2010 1:14 AM EDT reply actions  

one series at a time...lets not be too cocky...

but I get your drift, we passed bu the Cavs with flying colors when every single expert out there would have said the Cavs are the would be NBA Champs, and with good reason of course, they have the King, they traded for Shaq and Jamison was the final piece of the puzzle for them…
Boston though is just too good of a match up for them, we had a healthy KG, Ray came sharp, PP was ready to guard the King and we have the best PG in the Playoffs in Rondo. enough said.

"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."

by bopna on May 14, 2010 1:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Orlando

is the most intimidating team left in the playoffs, to me of course. But hey, we’ve gone to a game 7 last year with ‘em WITHOUT kg. I believe we’ll take them in game 6 as well. I’m only scared of Orlando’s perimeter shooting. I believe KG and Perk will handle it on the inside.

by Caliente on May 14, 2010 3:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not only without KG but also without Powe. We had Mikki on the bench, Scal the first option off the bench and Baby starting. And still took them to 7. Now we have KG back looking good, Davis and Wallace off the bench and Scal wearing those hideous blue sport coats.

by JPV on May 14, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right, but

Don’t forget Orlando didn’t have Jameer or Barnes, or Carter, or JWill or Ryan Anderson or Bass. I know the Celtics didn’t have Garnett, Powe, Finley, Robinson, etc… I’m just saying it applies both ways so don’t expect that to be an advantage.

by BlueSkyOneCloud on May 14, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

KG PLAY BIG!

lewis cant guard him ,i hope we can take it in 6 imma pray for it,we got the match ups in our side so i think we gotta good chance at pulling it off

by stylo617617 on May 14, 2010 1:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Those idiots from ESPN think otherwise...

they’d already anointed Jameer as the difference for the series, well newsflash for them…Rondo will eat Jameer, KG will same thing exploit Lewis, PP vs. VC..please… and ofcourse we have the ultimate Dwight kryptonite in Perk.

"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."

by bopna on May 14, 2010 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jameer will indeed be the difference.

And it’s time for Rondo to put a stranglehold on him. What they forget about Nelson is he’s not a defensive point guard but Dwight controls the paint enough to cover for his lack of defense. Now if Nelson were guarding someone not named Felton and the dying corpse of Bibby, it might actually expose his weaknesses.

by paolost on May 14, 2010 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Celtics win almost every matchup

except Dwight vs Perk (which is much closer than most other Dwight Matchups) and the Bench. Presence of Dwight does somewhat limit Rondo’s drives to the basket but he should still be able to get the dimes.

Unless V.C.’s recent effort is a permanent thing it should be a Celtics win.

by ddg121 on May 14, 2010 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

But VC could be a bit too quick for today's PP

If VC gets past PP on a consistent basis, our bigs will have to move over to cover leaving Howard open for dunks.

BTW, are we still the underdog, after what happened in the Cavs series?

by getthat18now on May 14, 2010 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yup. We're the underdog.

Orlando’s been lights out great so far. And something crazy like 30-3 dating back to the regular season. Still, as with Cleveland – it’s gonna be a dogfight.

by TheOutletPass on May 14, 2010 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

30-3 ??

Really? That also means they are due for a let down. Why not starting Sunday?

by getthat18now on May 14, 2010 3:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Orlando’s been lights out great so far.

Orlando has had the easiest road of anyone in the playoffs so far.

They also haven’t had a bad matchup for their personnel. We’re a bad matchup for their personnel.

Howard will get his, but Perk is going to shove him around inside and make him pay, just like last year. Nelson is going to have a lot of problems with Rondo on both ends, but if he plays really well it could hurt us. Nelson has a pretty big challenge in front of him. Pierce and Tony Allen guarding Vince Carter is really the big matchup IMO. Carter is the guy who can burn us, as unlikely as it seems.

Its a good bet to go 6 or 7, but I think we win.

by alskor on May 14, 2010 4:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Perk vs. Howard

Howard has virtually no offensive game from >4 feet out… so Perk and Big Baby muscling him and another defender helping when they can to front him while Perk moves him off the block works well. The Celtics always come up with great gameplans to deny guys the ball where they like/are good with it. Howard will still score plenty, of course, but we can neutralize him some, as we did last year.

Really, Orlando will have to shoot the lights out to beat us… which they will do in a couple games, most likely. We have to keep Rondo crashing the boards and starting the transition. Our offense is completely unstoppable in the open court.

If KG, Tony Allen and Big Baby play like they have… no one can stop us. This team suddenly looks 8-9 deep in high quality players – and I’m including Pierce here – even though he’s been playing terrible. Imagine if Paul gets hot?

by alskor on May 14, 2010 4:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Perk and Sheed will often be expected to defend Howard man-up.

That will allow us to play tight coverage on all their perimeter shooters. Yes, help will be provided, but we have to avoid getting caught with either a wing coming in to help on Howard – leading to getting burned by a 3 or expecting Perk to step out to defend the open perimeter shooter and having the ball then come in to Howard with only a small on him.

Perk and Sheed are two of the few guys who can do that (play single-man on Howard). Having both guys (and thus 12 fouls to give) means we actually can use a defense similar to what we did with Shaq. Just use single man on Howard and play him hard. Use all our fouls. Then our other 4 guys just have to always keep two guys on the ball as it moves around the perimeter. We have to keep shifting laterally and deny VC access to the paint while still contesting every perimeter shot.

’Sounds easy, right? LOL …

by mmmmm on May 14, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Howard gets in foul trouble like the previous two series, it will be more difficult for his teammates to step it up against the C’s defense. And since the Magic are mostly a perimeter team, we will not commit as many fouls and keep our bigs in the game longer, hopefully with Howard sitting on the bench in foul trouble. I see this as the key. If the Magic are making their shots, then we can be in trouble. Keep a hand in their faces on the perimeter and get Howard in foul trouble.

by JPV on May 14, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Celtics in 6

We’ve put a serious dent in the LBJ legacy. Now we can reinforce Vince Carter’s.

by TheOutletPass on May 14, 2010 1:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Improbable championships are always the sweetest...

2010 would certainly crack my Top 5 favorite Celtic titles ever!

8 more wins to go…do not take the foot off the accelerator until then!

by Title 18 on May 14, 2010 1:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Boston is playing good basketball as Orlando is.

This would be one hell of a matchup because both teams actually rely on TEAM play, not on one guy alone unlike the Cavs.

May the Boston defense prevail.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

Yes, intimidation is the key to domination.

by Marjun Raposon on May 14, 2010 1:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Celtics in 6 or 7..

Celtics still has a chip on their shoulder after losing to the Magic 3 times during the regular season. Especially that 2 point win they got at their homecourt. It will be definitely hard to blow these guys out. Hope Perk and the bigs can contain Howard, Sheed also has been playing well just at the right time.

by Pierced_34 on May 14, 2010 1:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Good Luck C's

As a Laker fan I hope we can have a rubber match to determine bragging rights for the past 3 years. As many analysts have mentioned this week when healthy this version of the Celtics have yet to lose a series, so lets hope it keeps up for one more series.

by ddg121 on May 14, 2010 2:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Rubber match is when each team has won once each. We beat the Lakers in 08 and did not play them for the title in 09. So not sure what you mean, but I am rooting for a Lakers=Celtics final. I think the Magic will be our toughest out. We match up very well with the Lakers and our bench will make their bench look silly.

by JPV on May 14, 2010 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Magic is tougher than the Cavs

The Magic simply has more weapons than the Cavs. Playing the Cavs, once you can contain LBJ, the rest is pretty much harmless. But the Magic has more options, esp in the perimeter. If they are on fire, their 3 pointers can rain on you like those volcanic ashes. If the Celtics defenses the perimeter well, then it is be game over for the Magic.

by getthat18now on May 14, 2010 2:57 AM EDT reply actions  

pretty much have it nailed right here

We smack Vince around so he knows to shoot jumpers and stay out of the paint. Then we close out on their shooters. Then we win.

by TheOutletPass on May 14, 2010 3:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Celtics match up well with the Magic.

The key is defending the perimeter. And we must trust Perk and all the big guys on Dwight Howard.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

Yes, intimidation is the key to domination.

by Marjun Raposon on May 14, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm so happy! If I wasn't so tired, I'd be jumping around

I knew the C’s could do it. They have same guys as a couple years ago. Just took getting healthy and chemistry worked out.

What other teams are the Celtics not supposed to have a chance against?

Can we get Barkley to forecast some more doom & gloom?

by FlubberMcDrool on May 14, 2010 3:43 AM EDT reply actions  

This is fun, so enjoy it, but .....

It would be interesting to look the comments many of you have made as little as a few weeks ago or a month ago. You don’t really deserve the right to rejoice in the team’s win. This is no shocker and shouldn’t be to you. It’s nice to see how they have come together, but it was just a matter of the timing of the KG’s recovery and the work to get to re-mesh as a team, not the talent or the players’ collective abilitiy to do this. The guys got healthier and played the way we thought they could, coming into the season. KG leg strength is a lot further back and the signs were there of that in the late stages of the season. T. Allen is finally physically essentially what he was before his knee wrist and ankle derailed him.

This is the team that many of the posters here dumped on and had little perspective and little faith in management and coaches and a ridiculous sense of the nature of healing from injury for pro athletes who must push their bodies to the limits of the possible. So don’t point and say others said the Celts wouldn’t or couldn’t beat Cleveland or be a real threat in the playoffs. Many of you were there too. And now everyone is jumping up and down.

Those analysts (experts) who almost all picked the Cavs, they shouldn’t know the Celtics as well as we who follow them closely. (I note that Charles Barkley said that he wanted to pick the Cavs in a sweep but was willing to give the Celts a game at home. And I remember before the series started an ESPN analyst saying the Cavs had a big edge because of the KG would not be able to cover Antawn Jamison in that match up. Most were pretty pathetic in analyzing these teams. Although I have to give credit to Kenny Smith for his understanding what the Celtics have giving them a real chance against the Cavs).

So to the many of you who reacted like 8 years olds during the season with daily knee-jerk reactions to what the team had done in the last game or two, without regard to injury, the rotation juggling and the constant searching for the teamwork their success depends upon, and to those who derided KG as a has been, T. Allen as worthless and so on, please try to have a little perspective when your knee aches on a rainy day and you want to diss the players and management. And please appreciate their pride and effort and how they’ve worked to get the team back together in time to compete and hopefully do more in the playoffs.

by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 14, 2010 4:15 AM EDT reply actions  

No offense...

… but I don’t even remember seeing your name in here all year. And even if you were, I’m not really interested in you telling me I don’t have a right to rejoice in the team’s win, particularly when I’ve been a fan for twenty years. Especially when any doubts about this team were well-founded all season. And not in reaction to a couple of bad games.

So, thanks for showing up now with your lectures.

But I’ll pass.

by TheOutletPass on May 14, 2010 4:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

And the other aggravating thing about this post...

Is that we’ve all been making nice with each other all night, and enjoying the win.

But I guess there’s always one stick in the mud.

Pffffft.

Go Celtics!

by TheOutletPass on May 14, 2010 4:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

Go Celts! It was great game. And all Celtic Fans have the right to rejoice!

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on May 14, 2010 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Am I surprised.......

Not that surprised with Celtics win and definitely not surprised by your reaction. I did throw some cold water on the partying, and I expected some to react as you have, especially some of those guilty of the short-sightedness and short-memories I referred to. The way you protest, I suspect you may be one of the posters whom I in your word “lectured” here, but I don’t know that.

You’re right that I don’t spend my life here, but I have made 104 commnets over time and many with the same theme on having a little perspective. You can pass on the lecture, but that is not much of an argument against the truth in what I said about many of this blog’s posters.

by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 14, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Short-memories" - did you watch the regular season?

Was Danny Ainge having a knee-jerk reaction when he traded House and was shopping Ray?

by jv_squad on May 14, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah Danny really broke up the team

Not exactly, and that just supports my point. And I apppreciate Danny staying the course with the team and not getting desperate, as so many of the fair weather, desperate, knee-jerking fans here wanted him to do. The team on the floor now is essentially from the original roster (Finley excepted) with Baby and Tony Allen not ready physically to start the season and Daniels never making it fully back from his injury. It’s the team they started with that is taking them to the Conference Finals despite all the negativity and short sightedness on this blog all season.

The same fans here (and it’s not everyone but many) who left the bandwagon because of injuries and the effect it had on key players and the other players who had to shift roles, who called KG a has been, and who are now jumping back on. Of course it’s those same fans who are annoyed with my comment. Pathetic, you don’t even get the point, but I really didn’t think those of you with that mindset would.

by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 14, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

If only we all could be as great a fan as you

Enough with the holier-than-thou act. Those of us who are here every day are true Celtics fans. And once again, it is possible to be a huge fan of a team, but not believe they can win it all.

by vinnie on May 14, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sure you are good Celtics fans........

But there are many more equally good fans out there who have a little perspective and don’t feel the need to rant here all the time (or at all). And those of us who do try to bring a little perspective to the comments here, do not feel they are better fans than you or others like you, just a little smarter and willing to think a little before writing.

And please leave religion out of this.

by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 14, 2010 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whatever

I love that this is your reaction. The Celtics win a HUGE game, get everybody excited and your only post is to talk about how anyone who found flaw or predictive value in the regular season is somehow less of a fan than you. I’m so sick of people who think their way of being a fan is the ONLY way.

You want to be a scold, go ahead.

But do it somewhere else.

by TheOutletPass on May 14, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course we have the right ..

.. to rejoice this sweet victory especially since we have been disappointed so many times for so long this season.

by getthat18now on May 14, 2010 6:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right there with you. The negativity on this board at times was heavy. I kept drinking the green kool-ade during the season because I felt if the team was healthy for the playoffs, we could do some damage. I do disagree that this win was not a shocker. Although I thought we matched up well with the Cavs, their record v ours during the season, plus the way we lost some games during the last three weeks, did not signal to even the most die hard Celtics fan that this would be a cake walk.

by JPV on May 14, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for supporting the main point. I didn't know if they'd win...

but to me it wasn’t a shocker that they did. During the season it was a question of whether KG would get back physically enough by the playoffs. The Miami series gave strong indications that KG legs were getting stronger and he was getting closer to the great player he’s been. There was a terrrific Jackie MacMullan article on KG in the Globe right at the end of the season. He’s probably still not fully recovered and won’t be until next year, but he’s is way closer than he was and using his experience to compensate.

Add what Rondo was doing and how Tony Allen showed he could seriously contribute and it looked like they could compete. Agreed, I didn’t think it would be as easy to take the fifth game in Cleveland, but the Celts just had one of those great games and the Cavs don’t have the playoff success to fall back on to keep their confidence, their belief when tested like that.

by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 14, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know, I know

And although I’m not a newcomer, but a sometimes comer to this blog,

the line is “We don’t need no stinkin’ lecturing from newcomers”

by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 14, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Celtics in 6

Maybe I am wrong, but I think that Nelson is overestimated by ESPN experts, especially when his matchup will be RR9. I hope Rondo will take him to school. If Sheed, T.Allen and BBD play as well as in the series with the Cavs, we will beat them. I can’t wait for Sunday.

by Sebal on May 14, 2010 4:40 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Nelson is a very good player...

…but Rondo is the worst kind of matchup for him. Nelson is going to have a lot of problems dealing with Rondo’s quickness. Its a good thing for us they can’t really go small and keep a caddy in to guard Rondo. Nelson can’t guard Ray anyway, though.

They’re going to have a lot of problems if they play their regular starters. Gotta go Pietrus over Barnes a lot, right? They’re in a bad spot either way, though.

by alskor on May 14, 2010 5:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Matchup advantages, as I see it

C Perk/Sheed < Howard (but not by much, in the aggregate. We have two legitimate bodies to throw at this problem.)
PF KG > Lewis (Lewis is a great shooter, but KG is way better defender and looks healthy)
SF Pierce ~ Carter (depends which Carter shows up. I think Pierce might have a slight edge if only because he is a better defender than Carter.).
SG Ray > Barnes
PG Rondo > Neslon (but not by near as much as he out-classed Williams).

Bench play could be the big factor for this series.

Just as important as all the players is, of course, the coaching. SVG is a way better coach than Mike Brown. I think Doc & crew still have an edge, but it won’t be so obvious as it was in the last series.

by mmmmm on May 14, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that's the plan, but Sheed guarding Howard could go really bad really quick.

Might be Sheldon time very soon if Sheed decides to play like a little girl out on the perimeter.

by alskor on May 14, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Historically, Sheed has played extremely well against Howard.

‘Sheed isn’t young anymore, but he knows how to play Howard.

If it ‘goes bad really quick’ that will be because of the vagaries of fouls and officiating.

It is also not at all a bad thing to try to draw Howard out of the paint to guard perimeter shots because then our slashers will be able to penetrate at will.

If things go bad (both Perk and Sheed get too deep in fouls) then yeah, we’ll need Shelden to go out there and use up his fouls.

by mmmmm on May 14, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Old, yes. The other statements don't correlate with reality.

Rasheed’s defensive statistics this year were all either identical or better than his career averages. Including the all important Defensive Rebounding Percentage and Defensive Efficiency. For the latter, he was one of the best in the NBA this year for players logging 1600+ minutes.

Shooting threes was indeed his big weakness this year. His poor 3PT% (well below his career avg) killed his overall offensive stats. IN part he was taking so many 3s early in the year as part of balancing our offensive scheme because until we got Finley we only had one 3 PT shooter off the bench. It is important to note that after January, Rasheed cut his 3PT attempts per 36 minutes in half. After we got Finley, that meant that he and Nate could provide balance and floor spacing for the 2nd team offense.

Did you note that when Sheed took 3s in this last game, Ray was on the bench. Thus Sheed and Paul were the only 3PT shooters on the floor. He was doing his job. When Pierce slashed, he went to the corner to recieve the outlet pass and take the wide-open three. Even if he had missed it, it was still absolutely the correct play to make.

by mmmmm on May 15, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've never been a Tony Allen fan ...but....

  I think his play was perhaps the greatest key to the wins. He played a LOT of minutes and in many cases played better then PP who he replaced. Both on defense and offense.

by Dipper on May 14, 2010 6:13 AM EDT reply actions  

yes

and he was a great spark of the bench. He started the momentum. He gave the crowd and the Team energy.. Go Celtics!

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on May 14, 2010 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure if Tony is that smart even.

by schmalzilla on May 14, 2010 7:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Rember Xmas?

The C’s delivered a solid win vs the Magi, the end of the run of good games before injuries, role issues and lack-a-dasical play/rope-dope strategy started in. That, and I dont think they are as good with Carter.

by Tenacious D on May 14, 2010 7:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, I remember...

The Celts played without Pierce that day.

Also, the team we eliminated last night destroyed the Lakers in LA that same day!

by Title 18 on May 14, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Eee-ha!

I have to join the love fest here.

Time is limited for me right now. But I’m watching dvd replays of the games when I can. What a gutsy, hard headed team, cold blooded team.

Get…out…of their way.

Orlando will be some series.

I am loving what I am seeing. Even Sheed woke up and is being the player I hoped he would be. They need him. He is an x factor for the Cs now.

The Celtics may not have been the Untouchables this season.
but they are the Unpredictables.

loving Tony Allen – x-factor #2.

This is just so satisfying to see happening.

by Tom Halzack on May 14, 2010 8:04 AM EDT reply actions  

“Cold-Blooded”. Perfect way to describe the last 3 games. We get blown out of Game 3 and then do not allow them to reach 90 points in any of the remaining three wins. What I love about TA is when he and Rondo are on the court together. Not many teams can match that energy and quickness. And the defense those two bring together is phenomenal. What has been a frustrating season has turned into joy so far.

by JPV on May 14, 2010 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

The attitude of this team is....

close to felonious.

Never really seen anything like it.
 
So much disdain for the season. So much focus, confidence and energy now.

TA looking superb out there right now.

by Tom Halzack on May 14, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sheed

gave us pure effort tonight. Hopefully it will continue to the Magic Series.

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on May 14, 2010 8:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Plus

If Sheed keeps shooting 40-50% from 3, does he pull Howard 20 feet from the basket? That could be a huge X factor.

by Tugboat on May 14, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

THe Heart of A Champion

That’s what it takes to win. The Celtics showed that tonight. It was a great game. The game started a bit close but the Celtics just kept on doing what they need to do. Playing together has been the formula. Go Celtics!

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on May 14, 2010 8:17 AM EDT reply actions  

The 2007 ALCS saw the Sox shell C.C. Sabathia and was the end of his career in Cleveland.

Was last night another last game for a Cleveland star at the hands of a Boston team?

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on May 14, 2010 8:26 AM EDT reply actions  

this team is proving alot people wrong.

keep it up
this will be a tougher series… orlando is a real team & a better coach than Mike brown.
But i like our chances…how can you not.
C’s have not lost a Playoff series with KG in the line up.

by tommyfan on May 14, 2010 8:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Woohoo!

You have no idea how happy I am not having to worry about Le-Cavs anymore until next season. Paul Pierce’s 3-pointer definitely sealed the game for us, and what was it with LeBron and the 9 turnovers?! I’m guessing his reign in Cleveland is finally over…also I loved the New York Knicks chant in the Garden ’cuz if LeBron signed with New York then we may have a few more years before he assembles another championship contending team. Go Celtics!

by Witch-King on May 14, 2010 8:33 AM EDT reply actions  

dwayne wade, check.. lebron, check

dwight howard then kobe, this could be one heck of a run while beating the best 4 players in the game along the way.. just positive thinking/wishing over here!

by Dr.Greenthumb on May 14, 2010 8:38 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm hoping Phoenix knocks out LA

And Nash is a 2-time MVP himself. He’s a better player than anyone on Orlando, even at 36.

by post-it note on May 14, 2010 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

on to disneyland. the magic can shoot free throws (except for howard) and free throw shooting is not our specialty. one area of weakness. vince is playing well and can make the big shot. we will have to deflate him. we have to scramble to the 3 point line. last year, reddick played ray very well and became a factor in this series. we can’t let that happen again. nelson is one of the few pg’s who is smaller than rondo and i wonder if rondo can post him up. keep up the defensive intensity. kg instead of mikki helps here. we know that tony is primed and stubby as well. sheed is the x factor and if he gives us the energy, we look hard to beat.

by nazzbo on May 14, 2010 8:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Great series guys

My Cavs sucked… but good luck to you guys.

by kershaw_equals_stud on May 14, 2010 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

No

That’s what good defense does to you.

by C'sfan4life on May 14, 2010 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm predicting Stan Van Gundy will complain a lot this series

If it’s not about calls, it will be about the schedule. Or treatment of Howard. He’ll probably even complain Rondo’s behind the back passes are deceiving and unsportsmanlike.

by post-it note on May 14, 2010 9:01 AM EDT reply actions  

i must say

he’s a very decent coach, but he complains about trivial stuff way way way too much.

by paolost on May 14, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Legler

Always likes us. I’m glad he picked us. He was the only one to pick us in 08 as well.

Celtics again are underdogs, like 08, and will prove that they are the best team. Series by series…

by C'sfan4life on May 14, 2010 9:04 AM EDT reply actions  

I saw that, too.

He and Broussard this year.

Andrade and Hollinger have the magic in 5

by Tom Halzack on May 14, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

The key.

Tony Allen is the key in this series.

If he can lock down the perimeter, I have faith in Baby, Sheed, and Perk in stopping Dwight.

Celts in 6.

by Push on May 14, 2010 9:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Fate is a funny thing

for weeks we were chasing the 2 seed and then it became the 3 seed. IN the end we wound up as the 4 seed and strangely enough that’s probably the best thing that could have happened to us. We matched up great with Miami and had a relatively easy first round. Milwauke would have been tougher and had we played the Magic in the second round and had we won , I doubt we would have had anything left for the Cavs. We played the cavs when we had more energy and that was key. No matter what you say about Orlando – and they are a very tough team and are playing great ball right now- they do not present the same physical challenges as leBron and Shaq. Howard is tough but it’s not like playing against a 260 pound linebacker like LeBron who is quickm stong and just a bull. So in the end our seed position helped us in my opinion.Of course that won’t mean anything if we don’t win the next series.

by Red2 on May 14, 2010 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

ESPN's tears for LaBron this morning were yummy

The ESPN analysist (outside of Chris Brussard who is very fair) are so anti-Celtics that they no longer make me mad. They just make me laugh. The Celtics just won the series in six winning three games in a row including one epic blowout on the road in Game 5. Yet according to every “expert” the Cavs are “still the better team”. Even after the Game 5 blowout, at least three of them were claiming on the Daily Dime Chat yesterday the Celtics would not win another game in this series. Now Adande and Hollinger are claiming the Celtics will lose to Orlando in five. What a joke.

Also did anyone else catch the graphic last night claiming that the Lakers advanced to an “NBA RECORD” 22nd Conference final? I almost threw the remote through the TV when I saw that. The Celtics have won 17 titles. So that is 17 conference final trips right there. Then add in 58 (lost in finals), 67 (lost to Phily in conference finals), 73 (lost to the Knicks in coference finals), 75 (lost to the Bullets in conference finals), 77 (lost to Phily in conference finals), 82 (lost to Phily in conference finals), 85, 87 (lost to Lakers in NBA finals), 88 (Lost to Pistons in conference finals) and that is 26 trips to the conference finals. How can those boneheads mess that up. It is like the Celtics don’t exist in ESPN world.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Yep

Idiots, outside of Legs and CB.

by C'sfan4life on May 14, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

ESPN Radio in LA said yesterday............

“The Celtics are one of the top two greatest franchises in NBA history. It’s the Lakers and another team, probably Boston.”

Probably? Really? Last checked, Celtics have more championships than Los Angeles. By default that makes Boston THE greatest franchise in the NBA. The local ESPN radio station is the official Lakers broadcast station, so I get the bias, but certain facts can’t be disputed. But it’s actually amazing they even talked about the Celtics/Cavs series at all.

by post-it note on May 14, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I hate when people say that

They always say it is because “the Lakers have won more recently”. But no one ever says the Red Wings are a greater franchise than the Canadians or the Patriots are a greater franchise than the Packers.

The other thing that drives me crazy is no one ever mentions the Celtics’ and Red’s role in integrating sports. The media falls all over the Dodgers becuase of Jackie Robinson. They fall all over the 1966 West Texas Team. But then they never say a word about Red being the first NBA coach to start five black guys and the Celtics being the first major sports franchise to hire a black coach. Even later on, how many black NBA coaches were there in the 1980s when KC Jones was coaching the Celtics? Not many if any. Other than a half of a season with Magic, when have the Lakers ever had a black coach? What does the comb over not think black men can coach in the NBA?

But the media is so brain dead, they think that because the Celtics had some great white players, they must be the white man’s team. It just inferiates me.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent points!!

If I`m not mistaken…only Miami and the Lakers have never had a Black head coach. Miami gets a bit of a pass since they have existed 42 FEWER years than the Lakers!

Like you, I do NOT count Magic Johnson`s 16 game “publicity stunt” at the end of their dismal 1993 season as a legitimate head coaching experience. By the way, in those brief 16 games, the Lakers had an 11 game losing streak…tops in franchise history!

Red drafted the first Black player ever {C. Cooper in `50}…hired the 1st Black head coach in any sport {Russell in `66}…had the 1st all-Black starting line-up in NBA history {Russell, Sam, KC, Satch, Naulls}.

As for the Lakers` 15 titles…they count the 5 won by Minneapolis during the ancient, pre-24 second clock era!

by Title 18 on May 14, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree...The facts do not Lie

The Boston Celtics are the greatest NBA franchise in history to date having won 17 NBA titles all born and raised in Boston.

http://www.sportsmemorabilia.com/files/cache/boston-celtics-banner_df664d3bcf6597e1322353322e9f1644.jpg

The Los Angeles Lakers have only have won 10 NBA ….they cannot steal and claim credit for 5 titles won in Minneapolis by the Minneapolis Lakers.

  http://sportsbannerspennants.storeblogs.com/files/2009/10/76140-Los-Angeles-Lakers-Banner.jpg

by fordescort on May 14, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Conference Finals

I think a lot of our early titles were in years with 4 playoff teams. They probably don’t count those as conference final trips cause it was effectively the first round.

by thatmarvelousape on May 14, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

There used to be six not four

Until 1970-71, there was six teams in the playoffs with the team with the best record in each conference getting a bi. I still would count those years as reaching the conference finals since to get to that round, you still had to either have the best record or win a round of the playoffs to get there. Not counting them would be like saying that all the teams that won division titles before the wild card in baseball really didn’t reach the league championship series.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

hows LeBrons elbow now?

Join the NLL community at http://www.nationallacrosseleagueblog.blogspot.com/
Talk about Boston sports at http://www.bestbostonsports.com/

by bestbostonsports on May 14, 2010 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Also John...

Don’t forget 2002 (not sure if thats the exact year) against the Nets, 2008 and now 2010! Thats another three, puts us at 29. Stellar journalism from ESPN as always. Then again,

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=Predictions0910-NBAchamp

Wooo hooo suck it main media. Obviously I’m on a high here, so people just let me roll. its very possible this year if the Celts win a title, they would have gone through Wade, LeBron, Howard & Kobe all in their prime. Just think about that!

Celts in 5 over Magic, by the way. Orlando is much worse/softer than 2009 (with Vince instead of Turk) and we are obviously much better/tougher than 2009 (with KG and new-level Rondo). That series went 7 games, not sure why they are so heavily favored this time around.

by burnin green on May 14, 2010 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with you about Orlando

The thing that killed the Celtics last year was the combination of Turk and Lewis. Those guys are so big on the outside that the Celtics coldn’t match up with both of them. The Magic were just an odd team last year. It is really hard to match up with two six foot ten guys on the parimeter. Now they only have to match up with one. Vince Carter is just another athletic two guard. I don’t see either Allen having that much of a problem defending him. And even if you give Vince the advantage over Ray, the Magic have no one to match up with Rondo. And with KG back, they should have much better luck against Lewis.

I think people are going to be shocked how easy this is for the Celtics. The Cavs are a better team and they could only go six with the Celtics. Also I think the easy road in the first two rounds is going to hurt the Magic at least in game 1. The Magic haven’t played a good team in over a month. The Bobcats were horrible and Atlanta didn’t even try. That combined with the long rest is going to make it awfully difficult for the Magic to raise their game immediately in Game 1 to match a Celtics team coming off this series.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

The ESPN graphic was wrong!

The Laker franchise has gone to the conference Finals….40 times!

This is their 22nd trip since the start of the 1970-71 season alone.

by Title 18 on May 14, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Lakers have also been to the finals more than anyone else.

But they have also lost there more than anyone else. That 2-9 finals record against the Celtics doesn’t help.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree Title 18...

Many forget or do not recall that if t Bird and Maxwell were not injured in 85 and Mchale and Walton were not injured in 87 we would of probably won those 2 series.

by fordescort on May 14, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ah yes of course...

I totally forgot about that…wow Lenny would of sure helped us against LA that year.

Good catch Tiltle18.

by fordescort on May 14, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just did the math at Basketball Reference...

Trips to Conference Finals

Lakers—39
Celtics—32

by Title 18 on May 14, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

They are counting since 1971.

I don’t think that makes sense. The better number is the one you use. The ones when there were six teams and even four teams in the playoffs still count. You just got there by your regular season win percentage rather than winning a round or two of playoffs.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Totally agree John

We are going to see the highlight of that mid-season game where Lewis was blowing by KG with ease, over and over and over the next two days. And then KG is gonna light him up for 25/15 or something, and shut him down on defense. Then we are going to hear “what is wrong with Rashard Lewis? Is he hurt? Maybe his elbow?”

We took them to 7 games with Scal off the bench covering Lewis, and Mikki Moore coming on to guard Gortat & even Howard!!!! Plus, the new Rondo against pudgy Jamir Nelson is going to be a mismatch we can attack.

by burnin green on May 14, 2010 10:10 AM EDT reply actions  

One more interesting link....

This one surprised me, these were their pre-season picks for the East.

9 Cleveland, 8 Boston, 3 Magic.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=Predictions0910-East

by burnin green on May 14, 2010 10:14 AM EDT reply actions  

where is Timmy Legler in these picks?

he’s missing from the preseason champs picks too.

He’s one of the few guys with half a brain and actually WATCHES the game rather than base his opinion solely on public opinion and stats.

You think after he was the only “expert” to correctly pick the ‘08 finals he’d have the right to give his picks for at least a few years…

"Take it to the hoop, there's a dance involved." - DJ Tommy

by WillyBeamin on May 14, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Magic fan here

I was a fan of the celts vs the cavs, I look forward to a good series, hopefully the refs will let everyone play. Key to the series will be howards foul troubles and orlando’s outside shooting. Meer vs rondo should be fun to watch.

by DRDREW on May 14, 2010 10:29 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think ESPN is trying to reach people that know sports history. Or know what a sophisticated fan is.

by johnnymost on May 14, 2010 10:34 AM EDT reply actions  

I truly hate Bill Simmons. Here's what he had to say a few weeks ago:

I know the Celtics are going to lose in Round 1

On Tuesday, I thought Dwyane Wade could beat by himself what I described in a recent e-mail as a “decrepit, non-rebounding, poorly coached, dispirited, excuse-making, washed-up sham of a contender.”

(BTW, the misspelling on Dwayne is his, not mine).

by Cousin It on May 14, 2010 11:46 AM EDT reply actions  

i'll have to say

Bill Simmons is just being a fan like all of us. The C’s weren’t giving us much hope during the regular season, and no one really expected that there was a “switch” that could be turned on. If you read his latest article where he talks about what kind of fans there are, you’ll understand.

by paolost on May 14, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, that's ludicrous. Plenty of fans on here had faith, and certainly weren't

making definitive predictions of a first-round loss. That’s sensationalism and idiocy.

If you’re a fan, and you’re team is in the mix, you cheer for them to go as far as they can for as long as they can.

I don’t need Bill Simmons to help me understand “what kind of fans they are” (whoever you mean by “they”).

by Cousin It on May 14, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's not 'just being a fan'. He's a paid journalist.

So, we have every right to hold him to a higher standard than ‘just being a fan’.

Lots of us unpaid fans took the few minutes now and then through the course of the season needed to really understand what was going on with the team and understanding the oh-so-complicated distinction : Healthy Celtics vs Unhealthy Celtics.

Why the heck should we give a journalist whose JOB is to understand his subject a free pass? We criticize athletes when they don’t do their job.

by mmmmm on May 14, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree, and the worst thing about Simmons is that he loves to say, "mark my words," and "I told you so," as if

he has some rare insight that the average fan (or even the average GM) lacks.

But when you get right down to it, he really is just a fan (in the sense that he has no depth of understanding beyond the average Joe) who has successfully assumed an air of authority. I guess if you act like you know it all, some people will buy it.

And enough already with the incessant pop culture references and movie quotes. It was somewhat novel and interesting 15 years ago, but now it’s just an old crutch.

by Cousin It on May 14, 2010 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate him to

Simmons can be a funny guy. But in the end he is the prototype of what I call the douschbag NBA fan. This is a guy who never played any sport in his life. But is obsessed with whatever player the media tells him is the best player. Imagine a grown up version of the annoying kid puppet in those Kobe and Labron commercials. For some reason, these types always hate the Celtics. The only reason Simmons isn’t overtly a Celtics hater is because he grew up in Boston. Imagine if he had grown up in Chicago and New York. He would be even more annoying.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony Allen

Runs really well with Rondo and looks like a favorite target of Rondo’s because of his athleticism and hustle. Celts need to build around Rondo with hustle players like TA.

by ForexPirate on May 14, 2010 12:40 PM EDT reply actions  

John

As much as I hate to talk about him, you are pretty far off about Simmons. His father has had season tix for 30 years and he went to most of the games during the 80s 90s until he moved to LA 10 years ago. I used to read his stuff when he was originally the “Boston Sports Guy” and had one of the only blogs when the internet was just starting. With that said, I hated him all year and think he has totally sold out at this point. All he wrote about and talked about all year was how much he hated this team, the big 3 were all done and washed up, and predicted they would get swept in the first round. All of a sudden now all his articles he refers to the Celts as “we” again, and claims he is still a fan. Blah can’t believe I just wasted that much time talking about him.

by burnin green on May 14, 2010 2:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly! It all comes down to this: Fans don't count their team out before they are out.

I saw way too much of that on Celticsblog this year. And Simmons is such a know-it-all that I love when he’s wrong. Which is often.

by Cousin It on May 14, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair shot, Vinnie, but I think you're missing my bigger point.

It’s natural to DOUBT your team will win when they are playing poorly, but Simmons and lots of other fans here were saying they KNEW the Celtics would lose, like it was a done deal. In fact, Simmons titled that section of his article “What I know.” That’s the part that burns me, and I think it’s a valid criticism. Nobody knows anything until the game is over, or the series is over, or the season is over. So he shouldn’t act like he has a crystal ball and title his article, “What I know.” That’s just pompous.

by Cousin It on May 14, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know he is a real Celtics fan

I know he grew up in Boston. And he is a lifelong fan. But that is the only reason he is a fan. If he had grown up in any other city, he would be the most annoying Celtics hater on the planet. He is just that type.

I like some of his writing. He needs a better editor. And someone to cut down his podcasts. His conversations with people like Mike Lombardi or Hollinger are pretty good. But when he talks to his degenerate cousin or his Yankee fan friend, it is unlistenable. I don’t know why ESPN lets him do it.

by John70 on May 14, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi