Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

30Q: Reserve Roles: Delonte West or Von Wafer?

A few weeks ago, under the assumption that Von Wafer would be backing up Ray Allen at the shooting guard spot this season, I wondered aloud if Avery Bradley had a chance to steal some minutes at the position

Well, that was before the Celtics signed Delonte West. Now, a more accurate question (perhaps) is: Who should come off the bench first? Delonte West or Von Wafer?

The interesting thing is, we're slightly unsure about both players, but for different reasons. We know West can play, but we can't help but question his state of mind. Meanwhile, we assume Wafer can play, but we only really have one season to base that assumption off of. 

Despite his personal issues, West is still the more proven player, in terms of quality NBA seasons put forth, particularly for playoff teams. The numbers favor West as well, as he boasts higher career averages than Wafer in points, rebounds, assists, free throw percentage, field goal percentage, and three-point field goal percentage. However, that comes back to Wafer producing just one quality season to this point in time. If we judge West's career numbers against Wafer's one and only respectable season (2008-2009), the numbers even out considerably. West also has the advantage of having played for Doc Rivers before, although not in the current system. 

Star-divide

I'm very confident that public opinion will favor Delonte on this one, and understandably so. However, a few things do need to be taken into account.

First, training camp will be a great time to see whether or not Wafer's "breakout" season in 2009 was some sort of anomaly, or an accurate representation of his basketball potential. 

Second, West's career 3.7 assists per game average suggest he's a better playmaker than Wafer (career 0.8 assist per game average; 1.1 assists in 2008-2009), but in terms of both guards attacking the hoop, Wafer attempted 2.4 shots at the rim per game in 2008-2009 - the exact same number as West attempted at the rim last season. So, I'd say Wafer has playmaking potential, but it's now a matter of whether or not that potential is realized. 

Third, assuming neither player is cut during training camp, West will have to serve his 10-game suspension for pleading guilty to weapon's charges. Those first 10 games really could be Wafer's chance to garner real NBA minutes and prove to Doc and the team that he can be a valuable asset. It's definitely an opportunity for him to get a leg up on West. Doc has a habit of sticking with a bench player when he's consistently producing, and if Wafer can prove to be a valuable tool on offense and anything better than a liability on defense, he might just force Doc to wait on West, even once he is eligible to play in games. 

Again, this really all comes back to us not really knowing what to expect out of Wafer. Delonte's game is much more familiar. We know we'll see a very aggressive style of play, gritty defense, a clutch shot here and there, and intelligent basketball decisions. We know Wafer can score - that's why Danny Ainge brought him here. But whether or not scoring alone will be enough for Wafer remains to be seen. His impact next season might very well come down to how he can impact the other areas of the game for the Celtics. 

Poll
Who should come off the bench first for the Celtics next season?
Delonte West
1300 votes
Von Wafer
295 votes

1595 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 32 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Premature

I think this post is a little to soon…to be fair i rather wait to see which player fits best on the court chemistry wise with the team.We haven’t seen Von in over a year on the court and the last i saw Delonte he wasn’t at his best.Id rather give it at least a month into the season.

by house_call on Sep 9, 2010 8:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Still think its Delonte at the 2 and Von Wafer at the 3

Von can play the 3 and if motivated can play some D. Once Daniels gets injured we will see Von at the 3. We actually have a true second unit now which you couldn’t say in the past.
Robinson
West
Wafer
Baby
Shaq

by chanter on Sep 9, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Regarding Wafer palying the 3...

he may have no choice but to play at the small forward position since he may find it hard to get minutes in the back court with the current guard rotation of RAY – RONDO – NATE and DELONTE.

I think Doc will still use Wafer at times for spot duty in the back court (to utilize his size) so he will get some minutes in the back court I assume.

But with the lack of depth at the back up small forward position Wafer may just get most of his minutes playing at that position during the year.

by fordescort on Sep 10, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

When they want shooters on the floor.

You will absolutely see Wafer out there at the 3. He’s a bit small at 6’5, but he’s capable of it. It will be spot minutes though, when Doc’s looking to spread the floor for Shaq and place a bunch of shooters around him, forcing teams to double on Shaq or let him go 1v1 in the post (not a good idea 80% of teams out there, eve at his age, he can get easy buckets against an post defender not named Kendrick Perkins or Dwight Howard.) In those situations, going with Nate, West, Wafer give you 3 very good 3-pt shooters on the floor, and will make teams have to think twice about who comes over to help on Shaq and how they rotate to cover.

So yes, I fully expect to see Wafer out there at the 3 when match ups favor it.

by Sizzlack on Sep 10, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Delonte. And it isn’t even close. IMO.

The Once and Future King

by FlaGators on Sep 9, 2010 8:40 AM EDT reply actions  

99%

When I voted for Delonte the poll results showed that 89% agreed with me while 10% preferred Von Wafer… am I to assume that the other 1% somehow figured out a way to vote for Antoine Walker?

by rondofan09 on Sep 9, 2010 8:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Sorry, Rondofan, but my goal in life is not necessarily to agree with you.

I like Delonte very much, and am glad he is back in Boston. I think he can help this team, and vice versa. I know next to nothing about Wafer. I assume Doc will play them both and decide who is better in his scheme and who will get the time, and when, and where. (My goal, hopefully, is to agree with Doc… ;-) )

by thirstyboots18 on Sep 9, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Delone should get the nod from Doc 1st over Wafer no doubt...

Delone is until proven other wise (by Wafer) the more talented player a this time, so deserves to be ahead in the rotation.

But when Wafer does play , if he plays well and hustles etc…I am sure Doc will reward him by giving him additional playing minutes during the season….t
though it will be tough to find him serious minutes (barring injury) considering the C’s have a solid 4 man guard rotation of Rondo, Allen, West and Robinson.

The bigger question I see is who will the 1st guard be off the bench???

Do we sit Ray down and replace him with Nate 1st ?
or
Do we sit Rondo down 1st and replace him with West 1st?

by fordescort on Sep 9, 2010 11:29 AM EDT reply actions  

guard substitutions

Given the nature of the guard lineup we have at this point, there is no way I think we sub Nate for Ray anymore. With a full camp, Doc will almost certainly try to focus Nate on the PG position.

Yes, Nate can shoot as well as a lot of SGs, but lengthwise, Wafer, West and Avery (and Daniels) all are much better defensive options at SG. And Nate has very good ball-handling skills and Doc has been crying for years about having a bench PG who he can trust to bring the ball up.

I just don’t see Doc wasting too much time with Nate at the 2 this year. Yes, he can play it. But the need is not there.

So who comes off will depend on who goes out first. If Rondo goes to the bench first, then Nate will be off the bench first. If Ray goes to the bench first, it will be whomever wins the coveted SG bench spot: Wafer or West.

This is the first time in a long time that Doc actually has a full and straight sub lineup so he doesn’t have to do a switch substitutions scheme (i.e. bring in someone for PG and move them to SG with the next sub or vice versa). Unless someone gets hurt – I expect Doc to do straight position subs across the board for the 1st to 2nd team transition and only deviate from that for specific matchup advantages and for when he needs to go to the 3rd-level bench.

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree if Wafer cracks the guard rotation what you say may be true.....

but it all depends if Wafer can crack the back court rotation.

With a solid 4 guard rotation in Rondo – Ray – Nate and Delote we just may see more of Wafer at the the small forward position (though he may be used in the back court to help defend bigger guards at times) to help beef up the small forward position which the C’s lack depth in

If this is the case I think we will see alot of Nate at the shooting guard position as he is great coming off picks and creating his own offense.

Delonte though a decent shooter is as you say (elsewhere below) not a great shooter (especially compared to Nate) so he is best to play the point guard position.

The beauty of a Delone and Nate back court is that both players are basically combo guards who can both swap positions during games (depending on match ups etc.) since both can play both shooting and point guard positions to a decent extent.
This will give the C’s alot of flexibility and match up problems for opposing teams..

Add the fact Wafer will probably still perform spot duty in the back court (again especially to defend bigger guards ala Kobe etc.) then the flexibility for Doc and match up problems for opposing teams will only increase to the C’s benefit.

by fordescort on Sep 10, 2010 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Daniels proves too passive, as he sometimes does, then against the smaller 3s, Wafer could see some minutes there too (whereas Delonte’s just too small to play the 3).

I think Wafer has the tools to play defense, and if he doesn’t play it, he just won’t play. Doc didn’t even play Nate for a long while until he started playing defense. Just a hunch, but I think Wafer will turn out to be at least average on defense.

You’re right that West probably has the edge going into camp as backup 2, but Wafer has a chance to show Doc and Danny what he can do early on while West is out. Should be fun. Delonte is no slouch athletically, but Wafer appears the more explosive player. I can’t wait to watch this play out. This is going to be a fun season. Both players are classic low risk (financially), high reward players. Danny had a remarkable off-season.

doubleplusungoodthinker

by Mencius on Sep 9, 2010 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

Doc may just use Wafer at the small forwward position instead of the back court at times.

If Wafers defense can flourish Doc may just see him as a semi replacement for T Allen to nst to defend against some of the quick athletic small forwards the C’s will face this year.

At 6’5" he has some decent length to do so and of course as you say the tools defensively.

by fordescort on Sep 9, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with this.

Wafer’s additional length is a significant advantage. If his head is on his shoulders and he follows through with a commitment to be a team player, I think he is a better overall option at the 2.

I do agree with folks that as of this writing, West is probably a more predictably reliable player. But part of that predictability is the fact that, overall, West is a mediocre 1/2.

Delonte is just an average PG – Nate is a better ball handler and overall a better option as backup PG. And West is completely mediocre as a shooting guard. Not bad. Not great. Wafer’s length and athleticism and one year of real minutes suggest that he could be above average for a bench SG and has the length to also potentially provide minutes at SF.

And its that last thing that kinda sells it. Roster wise, we are not likely to have very many minutes at PG, since Rondo and Nate are young enough to eat them all up – and maybe Bradley gets a few tidbits once in a blue moon. Ray & Pierce are the ones we will want to spell more – so the most potential bench minutes are at the 2 & the 3. Thus Wafer lines up better for need than West does.

That said – potential is nothing until it shows up on the court. Wafer has to prove during the pre-season and those first 10 games that he can play like he did 2 years ago. If Wafer sucks – and Doc will know based on practice play what he’s got in Delonte’ – I will not be surprised to see Wafer cut when Delonte’ comes back. But if he doesn’t suck, I also would not be surprised to see Delonte’ get cut.

I don’t see them keeping both for the long run unless someone gets hurt.

That definitely is the hottest roster spot competition to start this season off.

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2010 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

ahmm...disagree...

we won’t put small lineup on the floor…as visualize the 2009-2010 championship between celts and lakers, we were beaten by height factor… they have twin tower in gasol and bynum plus artest at 3 spot with height and weight advantage over pierce and kobe over r. allen advantage… so we must put body and height is might unto them….

by cuteangelguy on Sep 9, 2010 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

what does that have to do with my post?

Where do I post anything counter to the idea of “we won’t put small lineup on the floor” ?

We are talking about bench guards going into the start of the regular season and you are talking about starting big men matchups from the finals?

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

depends on the situation.

If Doc will find the way to use them correctly, this is as basic as 1 + 2 = 3. Von is a much polished scorer than Delonte, so use him if we need some more scoring off the bench. Delonte is a much better defender than Von, use him off the bench to defend the opponent.

Same goes for Quis/Von. Need more outside shooters in the 2nd unit, Von as the 3. Need a slasher off the bench Quis as the 3. Need defense in the 3, Quis, need offense, Von.

my 2 cents.

by Yoki R on Sep 9, 2010 1:06 PM EDT reply actions  

that's a pretty good 2 pennies

A fair and reasonable assessment of the situation, though I"m not sure we would keep both Wafer and West in the long run.

West may just be insurance to see in these early games whether Wafer is for real or not.

by mmmmm on Sep 9, 2010 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's such a nice "problem" to have

Crazy deep this year. Lets hope it all works out together.

And BTW Matt Barnes is facing domestic violence charges…

by SpecialistK on Sep 9, 2010 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Von Wafer

But only for his Athleticism over Delonte West, We will see how het gets on in Training Camp and also the Pre-season

by Liam Whittaker on Sep 9, 2010 2:14 PM EDT reply actions  

How about Nate at 2 guard and Delonte at point?

I know this sounds a little crazy because nate is, well, a little short to play 2 guard, but I loved it when Delonte played back up point from time to time in cleveland. Also, that would allow nate to concentrate on what he likes most: scoring! He will feel less confined than in the point guard position, where he had to moderate his gime and pass the ball a lot. With delonte’s high basketball IQ at point and Nate’s explosiveness at 2 guard, the C’s have a solid backup backcourt… that is… IF Delonte has sorted his problems out…

by AP9 on Sep 9, 2010 4:07 PM EDT reply actions  

We just may see that at times...

depending on opposing team match ups since both Delote and Nate are combo guards and can play both the point and shooting guard positions decently, they just go back and forth swapping postions with each other when on the court at the same time.

The key here is both players offer Doc alot of flexibility now in the backcourt.

add Ray, Rondo and Wafer for spot duty in the back court (against bigger guards) to the mix and the C’s have a very versatile and deep 4- 5 man guard rotation.

by fordescort on Sep 10, 2010 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

new one...better celtics line up....

starting 5 2nd stinger Reserves

J. O’neal S. O’neal D. West
K. Garnett G. Davis K. Perkins
P.Pierce L. Harangody
R. Allen V. Wafer
R. Rondo N. Robinson

this Celtics team with final line up above is a great team that could won banner 18. it has a complete arsenal both offense and defense…

by cuteangelguy on Sep 9, 2010 9:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Huh?

What?… Did you just put West as a third string center?

I don’t get it, was this sarcasm, cause you seem serious there, but that makes no sense whatsoever.

by Sizzlack on Sep 10, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

@suizzlack...

what ya think? coud west be a center? use your brain cells anyway….

by cuteangelguy on Sep 11, 2010 12:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
No Trade
Small
center trade
Small
The Importance of the 6th Seed
Small
Debunking the "Build around Rondo" myth
Imagesca5vwn2y_small
Don't Worry
J0382610_small
Danny Ainge will have to trade Bass et al in exchange of . . .
Small
Why it makes no sense to blow this team up
Small
New CBA, contracts, and opt-outs
I_want_to_believe_small
The Reality of Rondo
401462_10150508373640614_580570613_9007645_2082321498_n_small
Time For The Celtics To Rebuild

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi