How the Big 4 Perform Against the Best Teams
The Celtics are about to embark on a series of huge games against the best teams in the league. In the next nine days we'll be facing the Mavericks, the Magic, the Lakers, AND the Heat...you know, just the cupcake teams of the league. Anyway, I decided that this would be a good time to check out how the Celtics tend to do against the best teams in the league. As I suspected, the results were pretty interesting.
The Celtics have gone 11 - 5 against the top 11 teams in the NBA this year by record. But three of those losses came with KG and/or Rondo out of the line-up, a fourth came when the team let down against the Thunder when Durant was hurt, and the fifth loss was the 2-point squeaker against the Mavericks that they'll be looking to avenge tonight. When you look at how the Lakers and Heat have struggled against the best competition, that's pretty impressive. But let's take it a step further and examine how the best players on our team perform against the best competition, as opposed to how they normally play.
| Player | Points | FG% | FT% | 3-ptrs | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | net +/- 36 | |
| Season Per 36 | Garnett | 17.4 | 53.3 | 83.3 | 0.0 | 10.4 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 10.0 |
| Vs Top 11 Per 36 | Garnett | 18.6 | 57.9 | 84.0 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 15.0 |
| Season Per 36 | Pierce | 20.0 | 51.2 | 85.0 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 10.3 |
| Vs Top 11 Per 36 | Pierce | 18.1 | 51.5 | 90.6 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 11.5 |
| Season Per 36 | Allen | 17.4 | 45.8 | 85.7 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 4.1 |
| Vs Top 11 Per 36 | Allen | 17.7 | 53.4 | 92.7 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 5.9 |
| Season Per 36 | Rondo | 10.3 | 51.5 | 51.6 | 0.2 | 4.3 | 12.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 8.9 |
| Vs Top 11 Per 36 | Rondo | 11.1 | 49.1 | 53.3 | 0.0 | 5.3 | 14.4 | 3.3 |
0.2 | 3.4 | 12.3 |
As you can see, each of the Big 4 have been stepping up their games against better competition, which fits exactly with what I would have expected coming in. But the interesting thing to me is what parts of their games they step up. I've noticed that against the Heat or the Lakers, the Celtics seem to go into full-business-team-Voltron mode with a perfect distribution of responsibilities. Rondo becomes THE distributor. Allen and Pierce become THE shooters. KG becomes THE defensive anchor and interior finisher. And it runs like clockwork.
Now, go back and take another look at those performances against the top teams. Allen's, Garnett's and Pierce's shooting percentages go through the roof, as all of a sudden they're locked in and hitting the important shots. And those big shots are easier because Rondo's assists go off the charts. Meanwhile, as the wings look to score, Garnett and Rondo both shoulder slightly bigger loads as distributors, rebounders and defenders. Against the best, Voltron is formed.
And look at the bottom line result. Against the best teams, each of the Big 4's on-court/off-court +/- goes way up. They take it upon their shoulders to step it up against the big dogs, and it shows in both the box score and the +/- stats. Pretty cool.
Anyway, that is what the Cs have shown us so far this year. Over the next 9 days they'll be facing some big tests. And I, for one, will be watching avidly to see if our best players continue to step it up and lead the way against the other big dog teams in the league.
Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.
7 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks
It’s nice to have numbers prove what I assumed to be the case.
the KG/Rondo combo is lethal.
"Do you know that nonbelievers create the most positive energy?" Davis said
You forgot about Perk...I wonder...
How does the true Anchor feel being left out all the time…hmm He probably doesn’t care as much as I do…
He is the match up key down low..especially now when it comes to proving he can run with the rest of the C’s squad again…
Oh and he also is the best big when defending Superwimp Howard…
I’m not blaming the poster more or less the media for hyping this Big 4 junk…
Did we all forget it takes a team to win the big golden ball?
Well, Perk has only played 5 games this year...
…would be kind of hard to do a statistical break-down that would make any kind of sense. In fact, this year’s Cs have had 5 guys all split up the center minutes thus far…can’t really just limit it to one for this discussion.
Then, there’s the fact that KG/Rondo/Pierce/Allen were all named All Stars just last night. Seems to e it kind of makes sense to build this particular discussion around them.
Dont get me wrong, Krep is right behind PP as far as my fave C’s, but the word duh comes to mind green boyz. What kind of complete statistical breakdown can you have with such a small sampling of games?
by Warrior Spirit on Feb 4, 2011 7:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Gotta love that
Thanks for posting this. I’d be willing to be that these numbers look a little bit different for the stars of LA, Miami, and Orlando…
Whaa...
Have you watched Perk in any of the previous years…Now you sound like ban wagon fans…leave the stats to the so called experts…I could care less about an All Star to me it is all about what is your contribution to another title…There are a lot of great players in the NBA but how many have multiple rings….

by 
































