Why Good Offense Cannot Replace Good Defense (and why Shaq must return)
Many of the arguments that have raged over Krstic's value to the team vs. Perk's have centered on K's better offense, vs. Perk's better defense. Arguments have been made that K can COMPENSATE for his inferior-to-Perk's defense with superior offensive skills. This argument does not hold water, for the following reasons.
- Basic basketball: If one guy doesn't take a shot in a given possession, almost always someone else will. The % probability of that someone else's shot going in will typically be around 45%-50%, around the team average. So offensive "production" will occur whether Krstic takes the shot or someone else does. Within the flow of the game, for a guy like Krstic to have an impact on the team's fortunes with his offense, he must score BETTER than the guys who would OTHERWISE take those shots.
- The fact that K can make the mid-range jumper is only relevant if he makes that shot at a rate significantly ABOVE Ray's, Paul's, KG's, etc. I.e., above the rate the "average" likely shooter (in his case, the starters) will shoot. If he merely MATCHES the other guys' rate, then he adds little to nothing to the end results with just his offense. (Krstic's actual FG% for jumpers is ~48%.)
- But the defensive end does not follow these rules AT ALL. If you don't defend the paint correctly, the other team WILL score more points. Period, end of story. No comparisons, no teammates involved.... it's a pure loss of defensive 'production' (or 'anti-production' if you will), which cannot be made up. When you screw up defensively, your team WILL lose ground on the scoreboard.
- To compensate with offense for a defensive deficiency (such as K seems to have) is virtually impossible, because you would have to score at a way, WAY higher rate than your teammates, and that just doesn't happen.
Btw, this is also why 'defense wins championships.' It's an irreplaceable part of the game, unlike offense. Any player can score, but every player must play good D or the team loses ground on the scoreboard. Put another way, scoring is "replaceable production", while defensive performance is "irreplaceable production" (because if you don't do it, generally nobody else will).
Conclusion from all this: We're not going into playoff battle with Krstic starting. No way, no how, not gonna happen. Our center MUST be Shaq. That was the key to the big trade, the plan all along... it had to be, because NOTHING ELSE makes any sense at all. Oh, I suppose you could say that JO might/will come back.... but (a) I don't believe in fairy tales, and (b) he ain't no Shaq. He's not even Perk.
So it's gotta be Shaq. The season, the championship, rests on his shoulders. He's had plenty of time off. He's apparently lost weight. He has said he's willing to shoot up in order to play. So.... shoot him up, suit him up, and let's get it on.
Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree with this. And it is imperative that Shaq returns healthy and functioning.
If good offense can replace good defense, the GS Warriors would be in the playoff hunt now and the Phoenix Suns of the mid-00’s would have three-peated or something.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot."
- Bill Russell
by Marjun Raposon on Mar 25, 2011 10:30 AM EDT reply actions
Yes, but
he’s not healthy. If he’s getting a cortisone shot, then his Achilles is inflamed and is causing pain and discomfort. I’ve had Achilles tendinitis and it’s really debilitating. He’ll play, and I think he’ll take as many shots as he needs to be “functional”, but he’s not going to be “healthy”. He hasn’t been for a long time and he’s not going to 100%. We can only hope that he can give us 15-20 mins/game despite the pain.
by McHaleinthepost on Mar 25, 2011 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
It is actually quite disturbing when I heard that news around the internet
despite the assurance of C’s management that there will be no setback. If I were him I’d take more rest. He is a big man and though he need conditioning, he doesn’t need that much to get back to his rhythm/groove unlike players who really on mid-range to long rage shooting.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot."
- Bill Russell
by Marjun Raposon on Mar 25, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
*rely
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot."
- Bill Russell
by Marjun Raposon on Mar 25, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Agree!
When Kristic is opportunistic on offense, converts his inside shots, and isn’t asked to defend against a true big, he is “passable” as a starter, but still not preferable. As we’ve seen recently though, when he is NOT performing at that high level, it’s not so much the defense that suffers, as much as it is the offense. Kristic’s presence does not really space the floor or get other players on the floor more open.
Shaq’s presence certainly does. He along with KG, is a double-team necessitating nightmare on offense, even when he is missing. This opens up the floor for KG, and it allows for a reliable dish-off opportunity for Rondo/Paul. Finally (and perhaps most forgotten), Shaq sets killer screens. This benefits Ray the most, and I don’t think it’s very surprising that he has struggled as of late without the help of proper big-man screens.
JO is a whole other bag that nobody can guess upon, so I’ll just leave that, haha.
Ashtray Bouquet
I learned to keep my worries to myself.
For making the same points earlier, I was called a “troll”, “on drugs”, and many other pretty things. The only player who is allowed to be critiqued on this blog is Rondo. Everybody else needs to keep their eyes and mouths shut, and hope for the best.

by 































