Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

The Perplexing Jeff Green

The time to hesitate is through.

Nice article from our friend Jay King on CelticsTown.  Here's a blurb.

The perplexing Jeff Green | Celtics news

Full disclosure: Jeff Green confuses me. I watch him play, and I wonder why he’s not more productive. I wonder why he’s not more willing to take a game by the throat and make his mark on it. I wonder why he hasn’t scored in double figures during any of his last six games, despite possessing a skill set that allows him to score from anywhere. I wonder why he’s not more of a matchup problem, despite theoretically being too quick for power forwards and too big for small forwards. Basketball comes easy to Jeff Green, it often looks like, but he still hasn’t made his presence felt consistently in Boston.

I suppose only time will tell if Jeff Green is going to "make his presence felt" or not.  I'm really, really pulling for him because I like his skillset and he seems like such a nice guy that wants to do well for his team.  That said, he'll have to prove himself on the biggest stage - the playoffs.  If he can do that, I am confident that he'll be a Celtic for a long time.

In the mailbag (I'll be getting around to that but boy are there a lot of questions - I might answer an eighth of them if I'm lucky) someone asked an interesting question.  "Is Jeff Green clutch?"

I had no idea, so (as I have done frequently in the last few weeks) I turned to my friend Dogburt over at Welcome to Loud City and put the question to him.  Here's what I got.

Star-divide

I would say that he's probably closer to a Robert Horry than a Kobe Bryant on the "killer instinct" scale. Green has a very even temperament that keeps him from becoming too affected by the moment of the game. If you look at his playoff stats, there really isn't anything eye-popping about them. He doesn't get better as the games become more meaningful. In particular, Green didn't even average 5 rebounds per game in that series [against the Lakers], and that lack of a willingness to take on a physical role is one of the big reasons the Thunder traded him.

That said, his even keel does afford him the ability to take big shots and not be affected by the moment. So I don't think it's reasonable to expect Green to get after it the way Tony Allen used to do for the Celtics, but he's also less likely to get rattled and hit shots/free throws when it matters.

I think we'd all take a Robert Horry type killer instinct if he can prove to be that reliable in the clutch.  So far Doc has not used him at the end of games and I wonder if that is more for defensive reasons or comfort level or what.  If anything, I think it would be great to have another versatile scorer out on the floor that doesn't get rattled and could read and react to the crazy circumstances that inevitably arise in the final minutes.  With that said, he has also scored more readily in transition than in the half court set, so perhaps that is holding him back as well.

I also fear that he's just plain too deferential.  Ray Allen is a nice guy too, but he's also a stone cold assassin.  The game came easy to Tracy McGrady but that didn't stop him from dominating when he put his mind to it.  (note: I'm not comparing his game to those guys, just his demeanor)  It would seem that Green needs to find that extra gear and go for the throat of his opponents if he's going to fulfill his potential.

Regardless, we'll see what stuff he's really made of in the coming weeks and months.  If it wasn't for all the injuries, I'd call him the biggest X factor headed into the playoffs.  I am holding out hope that we'll him develop into a game changer when we need him the most, but who knows?

Bonus Link (from another old friend Greg Payne): No more Mr. Nice Guy for Green - ESPN Boston

Bonus Link 2: From Zach Lowe - The Point Forward - Green not living up to Celtics’ hopes … yet

Yup, another Bonus Link: From Dogburt - The Celtics and Jeff Green: How Is Green Faring? - Welcome to Loud City

Comment 96 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

not complicated

this isn’t complicated. Jeff Green was a star in college. From day one in the NBA he was a starter playing 35-40 minutes where he was always the #2 or #3 option on offense. And he did all of that on a good team. It wasnt like he was a good player on a bad team. And he was someone who was likely always on the court down the stretch in important situations. Now he comes to the Celtics where he doesn’t really have a position, doesn’t really have a consistent role, and has to play backup to Pierce and Garnett – not a situation that is going to give him many real opportunities. It would be a tough adjustment on anyone.

I’d like to see Doc get more creative than he has. Why not go big at times and have Green come into the game for Ray, move Pierce to the 2 and Green at the 3. Or go small, have Green come in for whoever is at center ad slide KG to the center. Obviously that cant work against all teams and all lineups, but it can work. being flexible and creating matchup problems can work.

I like Doc, he has been the perfect coach for this veteran type team the last few years. But he is slow to trust new/young players. He needs to develop that trust with green and let him play more with the starters and let him play more in key situations. Now he just plays in short spurts and it is difficult for anyone to get a sense of what he can and cant do with this team.

by bigperm33 on Apr 4, 2011 10:55 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

His NBA team wasn’t good in his first year, but your points are well-taken.

by dslack on Apr 4, 2011 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with points in here bigperm

I’ll suggest that time is an issue as well. Adding offensive schemes or plays at this time of the year is difficult, especially when you can’t even count on your expected starting 5.

Saying that…Doc’s ‘easy fix’ is having Green run out front in transition to get him some baskets and put pressure on defenses to get back. It gives him a (simple) role in an otherwise established offense.

Celtic defenses and offenses can both be more complicated than many teams if all the players understand the variations they can/should run. Defense particularly depends on team work, but offense is also based on the established Celtics getting the ball where they are strongest or most comfortable.

It is a bit of a problem with newbies you are counting on for bigger roles. That said, they should be trying to find a better fit for Green.

by Tom Halzack on Apr 5, 2011 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with this completely

though in addition to the Pierce + Green configurations I want to see a lot of the Ray+Green configurations.

The 5-man units that have worked the best for Green have been with him at SF with Ray:


unit minute ORtg DRtg +/-
Rondo-Allen-Green-Garnett-Krstic 10.62 138.10 68.42 +69.67
West-Allen-Green-Davis-Garnett 14.17 145.46 92.00 +53.45
West-Allen-Green-Davis-Krstic 15.87 117.39 95.83 +21.56
Rondo-West-Green-Davis-Krstic 16.77 110.00 93.10 +16.90

(these don’t include the Detroit game).

Basically, I don’t really like Green at the 4. Yes he has speed, but today’s PFs – especially in the playoffs – tend to have too much size over him. And in the playoffs you need size at 4 to play post-up in the half-court.

Green’s numbers are WAY better at the 3, especially with the top-rotation guys above.

I basically would like to see Doc slide Pierce back & forth between the 2 & 3 and always keep two of Ray, Paul & Green on the floor.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're probably right, but it's hard to draw conclusions with such small sample sizes...

Even combining all of those lineups, we’re talking about 56 minutes over 20 games.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Apr 5, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

true

though it is has value in that it is against a variety of opponents and that it is with similar but distinct configurations. Distinct in that they are with different combinations of our top rotation guys, but similar in that they all have Green at SF.

Another way to look at it, with larger samples is to look at what is causing his overall numbers to be mediocre. Green has a little over 200 minutes (just under half his total minutes) at PF which are all notably underwhelming, especially on defense – his rating there is just over 105 pp100, which is mediocre – and not good by Celtic standards. Conversely, his total time at SF, about 54%, has him with a DRtg of ~101 which is very good.

Those ARE statistically significant samples and I think pretty clearly show that we are not using Green to best advantage when we deploy him at PF. That’s a ~4 point improvement on DRtg between PF and SF. I don’t know how we can ignore that.

The point of my smaller samples up above are to point out that if you further refine which units he is playing SF with to put him with guys who are more talented and more familiar with Celtic basketball (RR, Ray, West, BBD & Garnett) or with Green himself (in the case of Krstic) then the results have been outstanding – on both offense and defense.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Context, Watson

Jeff isn’t a starting caliber PF (he proved that in OKC), but he does have great potential to be part of an offensive-minded late-game small ball lineup, much like Posey was in 2007-2008.

You’re right, though, Jeff has been underwhelming at PF so far. Part of that is that Doc made playing (and learning) SF a bigger priority. The other part of that is that Doc is playing Jeff at PF with either Baby or Krstic at center, and those 2 guys just aren’t good fits together.

The real question nobody is asking is why Doc has pretty much ignored the one combination that makes the most sense—playing Green with the Big 4 (you know, the small ball lineup that Doc himself used to justify the trade the day the trade was made). Playing next to KG does wonders for one’s ability to play defense, and even though we may struggle rebounding the ball (like we do with Baby closing games as well), we should be able to make up for that by scoring more. Yet, since Green was acquired, he’s probably played less than 20 minutes total with the Big 4 and all of that time came when Baby was injured and missed those 4 games.

Right now, we have one legitimate crunch time lineup, and it’s with Baby at center. Last season, that was our ‘offensive’ crunch time lineup (Perk was a part of the defensive crunch time lineup), this season Baby it’s both our offensive AND defensive crunch time lineup. Versatility is needed in the playoffs, and I would have liked Doc to have established by now the ability to close games with Green at PF with the Big 4, yet he seems to be saving it for the playoffs. I’m not sure if we have the luxury of doing that, especially with the way Green’s confidence appears to be waning.

Short story short, Green can play PF if he’s playing with the Big 4 and specifically if he’s playing with KG, somebody who can cover for his defensive limitations.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 5, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Green with the Big 4

Actually, Green has logged 46.2 minutes with Rondo, Ray, Paul & KG. Offensively, its been very, very impressive, posting an ORtg of 113.48. Defensively, its a bit of a let-down so far, with a DRtg of 107.6. Overall, that’s still a pretty good configuration.

I agree with all your comments here.

If Jermaine continues to look healthy, I would not be surprised to see him start to get more minutes in the closing rotation. He shoots free throws waaay better than Perk so is not an offensive liability to have on the floor late in games and gives you that extra defensive presence needed to get those late-game defensive stops.

I’d really, really like to see BBD settled back into just the backup PF role for many of the same reasons I want Green at SF. He gives up too much length at C. Because of his strength, he’s at less of a disadvantage against tall PFs as Green is, though because he’s hard for them to push around.

A lot has been ripple effect due to our thin ranks at C. That has forced Doc to play BBD & KG more at C and created more of a need for Green to play minutes at PF.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually think Baby is more effective at center

What really hurts Baby’s effectiveness isn’t the position he’s playing, it’s the amount of time he’s playing. 30 seems to be the magic number, if we can keep him under that, I think he’s our best option at center to close games. If he goes for more than 30 minutes, the knee tendonitis and his weight/conditioning problems start to cause him to be ineffective.

JO’s offense won’t return this season, and he hasn’t shown any lift since his return (which is understandable, given his surgery), and that lack of lift means he can’t alter shots much, or rebound at his normal rate. I don’t think he’ll be closing anything in the playoffs, he’s going to be a minute eater with some possible PJ Brown potential to be a difference maker in a game or two (especially if we meet the Lakers in the Finals).

The reason Jeff at PF with the Big 4 is such an important lineup is that it has the potential to swing multiple games in the playoffs, especially against the Bulls and Heat. I don’t know whether Doc is saving that lineup for the playoffs, or if he wants to save some tread on KG’s tires and so he’s limiting the amount of regular season minutes he plays at center, but the key to unlocking Jeff’s potential this season is by playing him big minutes with the Big 4. And that lineup might just be the reason we get to the Finals—at least that was Danny’s reasoning when he made the deal. And so I want to see that lineup get as much chemistry as possible—46 minutes since late February for what stacks up to be our 2nd or 3rd best lineup is quite puzzling…

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 5, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

See I would disagree with that.

In the short minutes he’s been out there I’ve actually thought he’s done a great job altering shots. Fact is he’s a veteran guy who isn’t going to bite every time on the little fakes and lose control. He’s able to alter shots simply by being big and staying home without over extending. Krstic struggles at this, he has the size, but doesn’t have the innate timing to alter things lane. He ends up committing too early, and either fouls or gets caught out of position.

JO does a wonderful job at staying home, letting the player make his move, and reacting to it by contesting, either the passing lane, or the shot. For that reason I think he’s a great option to close, and if he can find his shot again (I have no idea where you come with this “his offense wont return” stuff, dealing in absolutes is absolutely futile) which has been very good over his career; basically he’d bring everything Baby does to the court, in a bigger frame.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

JO has good defensive instincts...

And it doesn’t take much to look better than Krstic when it comes to defensive decision making, but I still don’t think we’ve seen pre-surgery JO in terms of a shot-altering defensive presence. That’s OK though, he’s coming back from injury and his lift will be the last thing to return. He’s looked good going up and down the court and moving side to side, and if he can remain healthy I think his lift will return in about 2-3 weeks…

I can say his offense won’t return because offense is a product of health, confidence, opportunity and rhythm. We can hope he’s healthy, he’s looked good so far. If he can stay healthy, his veteran All-Star status might allow him to gain confidence in the next couple weeks (but even vets like Daniels in 2010 and TA in 2009 couldn’t regain their confidence after 2 months). But even if he remains healthy and gains confidence in his body and game, I don’t think he’ll get enough offensive opportunity on this team to build a rhythm. He needs shots and playing time (in addition to good health and confidence) to get back to where he was even last season, and there’s just not enough time or opportunity at this point to make that happen. So, yeah, his offense won’t return.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 5, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well at least you made some defensible points.

But I don’t like dealing on absolutes. I think JO can absolutely get his offensive game, be it the around out of the post he’s always been very good at, or that mid range game, to a very acceptable level.

You’re right in that he’s not going to be the primary option ever when he’s on the court, so he will struggle to find rhythm, I can’t argue that. But I wouldn’t go as far as to say it can’t happen. Based on the kind of minutes we expect him to play, I don’t think it’s crazy to look for 8-10 ppg/6-8 rpg.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

true

It would be nice to be able to look in the box score and see the number of minutes played changed from:

Davis 36
Green 18

to instead something like:

Davis 25
Green 29

I disagree somewhat about JO. I agree he’s not likely to get his shooting touch back, but he is making FTs and if he makes those, then he’s valuable to have on the floor late because an additional tall guy who can shoot FTs makes in-bounding the ball easier. Just like with Perk, we don’t need him to be able to score (other than dunks, layups and put-backs). But Perk’s problem was that having both him AND Rondo on the floor meant you only had 3 guys on the floor who you could throw the ball too. Jermaine gives you 4 options without giving up height or defense.

So far, Jermaine in his limited minutes does not seem to have lost much of his ability to alter shots. He’s averaging 2.51 blocks per 40 minutes, which is pretty studly, even better than Shaq’s. His Defensive Play Rate (blocks, steals, charges taken) is 2.96 per 40, just a hair behind Shaqs (3.09) and well above Perkin’s (1.91). Of the rest of the Celtics, only Garnett (2.86) is close to those two guys in defensive play rate (Delonte’ is a very respectable 4th at 2.74!!). Overall, JO’s defensive numbers look pretty solid.

His offensive numbers have indeed been pretty bad. But a 75% FT rate means he’s not going to hurt you by being on the floor late in a game.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Baby better as a shot taker and maker

JO’s lack of confidence on the offensive end not only means guys don’t look to pass to him much, but also means teams won’t guard him. I don’t see him as any more of an offensive threat than Perk was…

Baby’s a much better clutch shot maker, and I’d take him all day long at the FT line with the game on the line.

JO’s numbers might be nice in the limited sample size of the past 3 games, but what I see with my eyes is a guy who can’t jump right now. I don’t like how he’s rebounding, and I don’t think he’s altering shots the way he did pre-surgery. I also saw him grab his right knee on that charge he took Sunday night, so I wonder what kind of shape his body is in now that he’s playing minutes.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Apr 5, 2011 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Baby is shooting 37% away from the rim this year.

By far the worst of any player on the Celtics, and yes, that includes Rondo. He also takes more shots per game than Ray Allen, that should tell you something.

Oh and you want to talk about clutch? Did you see the Atlanta game? Where Davis followed up bad defensive play, with bad shot, and then clanked two free throws, all in consecutive order.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Problem with this is...

…even though he was the #3 option, he wasn’t very good in OKC. Shot averagely, didn’t rebound well, didn’t defend well, didn’t rack up assists…all he did was play a lot of minutes and score a decent amount (but not great) by playing a lot of minutes and shooting a fair amount of shots. A common thought around here was that he would become a BETTER player, because the one in OKC was not that impressive. Hasn’t happened yet. Maybe he’ll turn it around, and suddenly show something he hasn’t shown in two very different NBA situations, or maybe he was drafted too high is is really just a poor man’s Al Harrington.

by Fan from VT on Apr 5, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jeff Green would have been at his best as a #1

…Off the bench. If you go back and look at a number of games where the Thunder starters struggled early on, it was the second unit playing along with Jeff Green that turned the tides. Green was remarkably effective playing with backups James Harden, Eric Maynor, and Nick Collison, because he became the offensive focal point. When he was playing with Durant and Westbrook, he never really knew when it was ‘his’ turn.

Green does have an ability to make his teammates better though, but it does not always show up in the box score. Just like the guy the Thunder traded him for (I know better than to mention his name on this site ;-), the individual stats aren’t eye-popping, but good things seem to happen when he’s involved. The caveat is that Green can only do it for spurts; his production always curtails if he’s expected to maintain it for longer than about 25 minutes per game.

There is hope regarding Green’s temperament. Remember when Yao Ming came into the league? He had the same tendencies that Green does now – good guy, good teammate, but passive and unwilling to try to dominate. And then, almost as a conscious thought, Yao said, “That’s it. I’m going to start dunking on everybody.” And he did. He morphed into an unstoppable offensive force almost overnight, and it’s only b/c of injuries that Yao is where he is. So that mental switch CAN happen; it just takes the proper mix of emotion and experience.

www.welcometoloudcity.com

by J.A. Sherman on Apr 5, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's about doc's coaching

doc needs to give green confidence and i think playing him at the end of games until the season ends will give him that.

by TheBigFour on Apr 4, 2011 10:56 PM EDT reply actions  

this might sound insane to you guys but

Celtics is playing the seed. they dont want Orlando in the 2nd round and NY in first and the best thing about this is that the Vets are resting. but im not sure if they can hold on to 4th seed. since they have a very tough last games. HEY IM NOT WORRIED. cant wait for the playoffs!

by poezappa on Apr 5, 2011 7:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Where art thou Jeff Green???

Interesting post regarding the enigma that is Jeff Green. It’s obvious that he isn’t comfortable yet and not producing at anywhere close to the level that was expected. This has been discussed in previous threads over the past few days and it’s nice to see others wondering where the dynamic scorer Jeff Green is hiding.

Doc even mentioned that he needs to rebound more, his defense is average at best, rarely gets assists so he has to score to be effective.

Hopefully he will start to be more aggressive and provide much needs scoring off the bench. Scoring in double figures only twice in the past 9 games just isn’t enough…

Rivers went on to dismiss the idea that this in any way resembles last season's sleepwalking through the final months of the regular season (when star players were shut down due to injuries, leading to multiple late-season losses).

"Nothing like this," said Rivers. "Last year I shut them down. They were injured. They’re not injured. They’re not playing well."

by warnerjohn on Apr 4, 2011 11:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Glen Davis was like Jeff in his first year here

after a while, Baby eventually grew into a role and flourished, this could happen to Green as well but he needs a season under his belt with us, unfortunately, the club doesn’t have the luxury of time for that to happen, we need to win now

next year should be a big year for Green, if we fail to resign Davis, Green will take over the 6th man role and be expected to finish games just like Baby does now

by Banner 18 on Apr 4, 2011 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s trying too hard to not step on anybody’s foot. Jeff seems afraid to get in anyone’s way, doesn’t want to demand the ball.

The only problem is that while he’s being over polite Glen Davis is doing his vacuum impersonation.

by xmuscular ghandix on Apr 4, 2011 11:04 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Am I alone in thinking that Green has been exceptional thus far?

With a team that struggles to get shots for the likes of Ray Allen at times, it’s no surprise that Green hasn’t found a bigger slice of the offensive pie thus far.

When the Celtics make him a focal point of their offense he’ll produce more baskets. As it stands, he’s simply trying to play within the flow of the Celtics offense. The onus is really more on Rondo and Delonte to keep Green in the offense. Right now that’s not happening and Green is wary of disrupting the rhythm of the offense.

But he’s an efficient scorer. He runs the floor extremely well. I love his post game. And when he runs the high post slip on the pick and roll he’s been excellent finishing going to the right hand.

Defensively and on the boards his energy level has improved. I look for him to keep improving as he gets more comfortable but he’s been just what I had hoped frankly.

Basketball is like war in that offensive weapons are developed first, and it always takes a while for the defense to catch up. - Red Auerbach

by IanMello on Apr 4, 2011 11:13 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Exceptional is a stretch.

He’s been solid I’d say, but he’s behind the 9-ball a bit since so many people loved Perk so much. Basically if he’s not scoring 15-20 a game people are saying “we traded Perk for this?”

It’s not exactly fair to him, but it is what it is. I expect more out of Jeff as he finds his role a bit more, this is an adjustment he’s never had to make in his basketball career. But by all accounts he’s a smart, heady player who works hard and I have no doubts he will figure it out.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

No on Matt Howard...

But Lamb from UConn looks like he’ll be a nice pro prospect at the 3 spot.

Basketball is like war in that offensive weapons are developed first, and it always takes a while for the defense to catch up. - Red Auerbach

by IanMello on Apr 4, 2011 11:28 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

Yeah – Lamb looked real, real good out there.

Walker is a pretty special player as well, of course.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'll be shocked if he's not #1 after that game.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Green is a good player but while PP is playing with the C's, Green is a bench player.

Doc admitted not long ago that he had to learn how to play Green, he needs to get the best out of him. And for JG coming from a running and shooting team is a big transition, Celtic system is always look for the best option to score and not waste a ball possession, that intimidates new players.

by greenSD on Apr 4, 2011 11:53 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

Very true. Its similar to when the Knicks traded for Earl “The Pearl” Monroe back in the 70’s. Not comparing Green to Monroe, but there was a rocky transition from a run and gun fastbreak style to a slow down executing half court team

by OsirusCeltics on Apr 5, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jeff Green might be passive aggressive.

I await to see the guy actively demand the ball, get physical when he is posting a smaller forward or just get vocal for the sake of it. It adds up and those little things will also lead to his team mates looking to him more and giving him the ball. The ball stopper that Glen BD is at times, I wish Green would do that too since is offensively superior to BBD.

Digression::: that Lamb kid on UConn team has a smooth game.

by missyP on Apr 4, 2011 11:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Why it's the way it is

The very bottom line is that in today’s league, it’s just too difficult to find Jason Terry’s or Lamar Odom’s. Unless we cut down BDD’s minutes and give Jeff CONSISTENT30 minutes, he’s not going to produce the numbers we all expected him to produce. Had he played for less talented teams such as the Jazz or the Nets, he would be in the starting five and would be averaging fantastic number (ie. 19-23pts, 7-8 rebs). He’s no Pau Gasol, Tony Parker, or whomever the 2nd go to guy is on great teams. He’s at best 2nd or 3rd go to guy on a what we call, crappy teams.

Then there is another factor, playing with the ‘legends’ on the court. He can’t play free (not to mention the Celtics don’t exactly run the type of offense where players are sort of left ‘free’). He has KG, PP, Rondo, and Ray on the court all the time and it’s just difficult for him to play his offense.

Green needs to play on a consistent basis if we want him to be productive. That’s the bottom line. Right now, he’s averaging somewhere around 20 minutes. We can’t expect him to score 15 pts and grab 7 rebs in that span. This is a whole new system for Green.

"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’

by TheBigFive on Apr 5, 2011 12:30 AM EDT reply actions  

7 rebounds?

This guy is allergic to rebounds. He averaged 5 in 35 minutes with Oklahoma and is averaging 1 every 10 minutes with the Celtics. That’s why I say he’s following a trail blazed by Scales and McCarty as the NBA’s littlest big man.

by Celtsfansince55 on Apr 5, 2011 6:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

We are not a great rebounding team right now and Doc preaches getting back quickly on defense.

Green needs more time to get with the systems and adapt playing with superstar veterans. Problem is we are about out of time. Doc will have to trust him and I wrote yesterday that he shoud get some burn at the end of the next few games rather than Baby, just to see how he and the team fares.

by JPV on Apr 5, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Green should be the 1st option on the bench.

In bench line ups when he’s out there without KG, Ray, or Paul; Green needs to be the 1st option in the offense. The problem, many times, is Davis and his delusions of grandeur thinking he needs to “lead” the second unit by being the first option and jacking up lousy 19 ft jump shots.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't mind BBD taking the open shot so much - when he sometimes is left completely alone

after all, Doc generally wants guys taking the shot when they have an open look. And so many of these, you see that the defense isn’t within 9 feet of BBD because they are doubling someone else or sagged into the paint, leaving him wide open way outside.

What I don’t like in those situations is that he doesn’t step into the shot when there is no one in front of him. He could easily be converting those 19 footers into 14 footers or closer by just stepping forward before he takes the shot, getting a much easier, higher percentage shot off.

Or use the gap to drive the hoop. BBD is fast enough and certainly strong enough that when he is in those situations he should be able to drive to the hoop and create fouls.

Sigh … I don’t really care who scores our points. I just want us to stay aggressive and go to the hoop as much as possible. Good things happen when we do.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Valid point.

I agree with you, hence the last sentence “Jacking up lousy 19 ft jump shots” if he turns those into better, 14 ft jump shots, or better yet, drives to the hoop and gets to the line more, than I’m thrilled.

But he has got to stop shooting from 19 ft, unless there’s 1 second on the shot clock.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

yep

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

thread within thread

UConn won in one of the ugliest championship games I’ve ever seen. Butler bigs were missing layups all night and both teams were missing shots they should have been hitting…even in the face of some solid (but not perfect) defense.

Thank goodness for UConn bigs Oriaki, Okwandu and Smith inside and Lamb finding the range early in the second half.

Kemba unimpressive in last two games.

by Tom Halzack on Apr 5, 2011 12:55 AM EDT reply actions  

As for Green,

He may have some hot streaks in the playoffs, but we’re not going to see the full potential of what he can do for us until hes starting games. And that’s not happening for a couple more years- that’s if we even resign him which I don’t think is a given…

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Apr 5, 2011 1:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Ainge made the trade because he sees the value and future in Green(he will not let him go again)

by Blackberry33 on Apr 5, 2011 1:32 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Maybe,

but theres also the possibility that Green will want a bigger role. Especially if he doesn’t play well as our seventh man in the playoffs. What’s stopping him from jumping at the chance to make more money and be a legit 2nd or 3rd option again for a lesser team?

He’s going to want a decent check, he’s put in 4 solid years now and has earned it. But if Ainge and the ownership wasn’t willing to pay Perkins, why would they overpay a bench player who struggles with his role?

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Apr 5, 2011 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ya, but if he's smart (and I think he is) he'll see the value in playing for a contender, and being able to start in 3 years.

He’ll just be entering his prime then (26-27 years old) and at a perfect time to strike into the starting line up. It’s also positioning him to sign a big contract to finish out his career. Basically, say he signs 4 years with the Celtics, that means in year 4, Paul will most likely be gone (his contract is up in 3 years) and Green will be starting, allowing him to expand his role in the last year of his deal and play for his new contract. Which, once given starter minutes if he really explodes, could be a large, multi-year one. It’s just smart business.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Smart Business for Jeff

would be not waiting three years and risking his last chance at a big payout in his fourth full year with the Celtics. What if he gets injured in his contract year?

Smart business is maximizing your value. And for Jeff that would be sooner rather than later.

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Apr 5, 2011 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

His value isn't maximized right now.

Unless he comes out and plays huge all of the sudden. If he’s a major contributer to a championship, ala James Posey, then obviously that all changes.

However, Boston would be willing to pay Posey money (8mil/4year range) for Green, like they weren’t for Posey, due to his age. So the question is, is there a 10mil a year market out there for Green. I have heard time believing that.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

heard=hard

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we'll just have to agree to disagree

because heres what I think it boils down to:

1- Green has been a starter his whole career. More recently on a very good Thunder team. So it’s not like he’s just some bum putting up numbers on a crap team. What motivation does he have to stick it out in a C’s uniform playing from the bench in a role that doesn’t fit him? Add to it that Boston is about to enter a transition phase and there’s no level of certainty that we’ll be legit contenders in 3 or even 2 years.
2- General Managers who have cap room and need scoring will be looking for an all-star caliber player to sign. And I think everyone here would agree that Green certainly has all-star potential. Those same GM’s aren’t going to judge Green off of a failed experiment at a bench role in Boston over the course of a couple months. That’s not why they’d be bringing him in. They’ll judge what he did as a starter in OKC when he was averaging 15/5 for three years. And trust me, there will be plenty of teams willing to go above 32 Mil over 4 years.

Also, Jeff is an explosive athlete. Those guys tend to not have the longest NBA shelf lives when compared to people who actually play defense and are tough like a Shane Battier type. Age plays a factor here. Jeff is young now. But his skill-set is available to him because of that. He won’t always be able to do what he does.

I’m not trying to draw out a debate with you, I’m just trying to think about this off-season from Jeff and his agent’s perspective and I can’t see how staying here makes sense for him if there are better offers on the table from teams that aren’t in a transition phase. And I think there will be.

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Apr 5, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be honest, and this is the last thing I'll say...

I’ve always liked Jeff. And I really hope you’re right and we get him to stay for cheap (relatively speaking).

I really want to see what he can do starting with Rondo. I’m just not sure I’m willing to wait 3 years for it. And I’m positive he isn’t either.

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Apr 5, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree. Unfortunately, I think Green is going to demand a very big payday. Well deserved but he is also far down the pecking order today. If the C’s win championship this year, I can see 1 or 2 of the big four retiring, opening the way for a big contract for Green to stay in …. green.

by vgarcia890 on Apr 5, 2011 4:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Green's going to want to go somewhere...

… where he gets paid and where he’s got a starting role. That’s not here in Boston, not with Pierce and KG entrenched for at least a couple more seasons.

On the money side, what happens in a couple months when someone throws a 5-year contract offer at Green? C’s can match, but would they? SOMEONE will throw at least Travis Outlaw dollars at Jeff Green, but has he shown enough in his time here to justify that kind of long-term commitment? Someone will offer at least something like 5/$35, just based on his production on OKC, and I’m not sure he’s worth it. I’m not sure he’s a guy to build around.

The shying-away-from-contact, not going after rebounds, that’s not going to change. Guys don’t magically become more physical, more willing to bang. If anything, guys shy further away from the interior as they get older. I’m just not seeing that killer instinct, not just in scoring, but in really going after it, getting into the scrum, battling.

Haven’t seen much to speak of on the defensive end.

They talked about Green like he was another Posey… and I’m just not seeing it. I’m seeing a pretty athletic guy, who can do a little of everything, but who doesn’t seem to be exceptional at any particular thing. I don’t see him as that nitty-gritty, hard-nosed presence.

Could he get better? Sure, he’s got the tools. He ain’t a rookie, though; at this point in his career, he is what he is.

by theBird on Apr 5, 2011 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Posey comparison

I believe really only came from the ability to play the wing most of th time and power forward when going small.

Because after that, there aren’t many similarities. Jeff is an explosive athlete who can score in different ways. Posey is a guy who can score when needed to, but odds are he’s in the game because he’s a tough SOB that plays great defense and gets in the mix of things.

Green doesn’t do that yet. And that kind of mentality really can’t be taught.

P2 is the man.

by MikeMartin on Apr 5, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

But it can be developed.

Here’s to hoping KG rubs off on him a bit.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is simple folks...

…this is complete impatience by all of you…

Jeff Green is not a guy that “takes control” of a game when around unfamiliar teammates with established resumes and championship pedigree and expectations….

When his role grows in the future he’ll force his game on the opposition plenty…but that’s the future…for now, it is going to be up to his coach and his teammates to get him involved – validate his skills through their encouragement.

It’s not Jeff Green’s nature to come into this type of environment and assert his will…he’s running the court in transition, posting up, and making himself available. The team needs to find him in his spots, its that simple…

by BillfromBoston on Apr 5, 2011 2:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed...

and this is why I felt Green has been exceptional. Most players who move from a starting role and nearly 40 mpg into a backup and ~25 mpg would struggle with their game. Instead of that Green has been efficient and effective in relation to the amount of touches/scoring opportunities he’s getting.

The guy just oozes offensive talent he’s just not a Pierce/Ray Allen type who will demand the ball. The upside to Green is that he doesn’t seem to be upset about his reduced role and he obviously still has the ability to play a larger offensive role if needed. I’m a big fan of Jeff Green’s game.

Basketball is like war in that offensive weapons are developed first, and it always takes a while for the defense to catch up. - Red Auerbach

by IanMello on Apr 5, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

I concur with both of you.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

  Maybe if Glen Davis wasn’t such a black hole, Green might see the ball more and therefore be a more productive player off our bench.

by CelticsFanNC on Apr 5, 2011 6:34 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

Boston Celtics Future 2011 Finals Winners
(Boston Celtics) BOS 1-1 LAF (Los Angeles Fakers)

by OttawaCeltic on Apr 5, 2011 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

i read all these talk about JG

and it seems like most of us here are not aware that JG “is not a consistent player.” that is the main issue with this kid. it was said several times before and after the trade that ‘consistency’ is the biggest problem of JG.

IM not surprised what he’s giving us. what i’m concerned about is how Doc will help him.

by poezappa on Apr 5, 2011 7:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Touches

  It is very difficult if not impossible to be a consistently productive player when you don’t see the ball consistently. No one off the Celtics bench ever sees the ball with any consistency except Glen Davis and once he touches it he’s going to shoot it. The Celtics are known for their ball movement getting guys open shots but that isn’t the case when Davis is in the game because all ball movement stops once he touches the ball.

  In Oklahoma City Green also didn’t consistently see the ball due to Westbrook and Durant.

  I just think that is a bit of an unfair criticism of Green especially in his time here in Boston where he has stretches on the floor where they don’t even look his way

by CelticsFanNC on Apr 5, 2011 7:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

yup i got your point

its just that. here in boston he’s role is very limited. just a great example is TA (i miss that guy) when he went to Elvisland. he became role player. but when he was in boston. he is just limited. actually limited than JG.

and one more thing if Celts is just coasting they should play the 2nd unit for the playoffs. we’re still have a problem in team chemistry.

by poezappa on Apr 5, 2011 7:16 AM EDT reply actions  

He's trying to fit in

New guy among a core than includes multiple current and past all-stars and four hall of famers. it would take a person of great ego to come in and make his mark right away. In addition, I don’t think we’re running plays for him. Other than telling him to run as fast as possible, I don’t see anything designed to take advantage of his athleticism. Really wouldn’t mind seeing him start a few games in place of Pierce and KG down the stretch to get him more touches on the offensive end and give our guys a rest. It’s just reaching a balance of Green asserting himself and Doc and the core unit making sure they include him in their vision of winning. And this guy is good enough to win the C’s some games in the playoffs. If Doc thought Nate would win him a game or two last year, he must think Green is at least capable of the same (and he’s a lot less capable of losing a game for you). He’s the reason we’re a better offensive team after the trade. We should figure out how to make him successful ASAP.

by CelticsFan616 on Apr 5, 2011 7:16 AM EDT reply actions  

He'll be good

We know what he’s capable of. Some things can only be solved by time (like his defense, where he helps to much. Or the chemistry between him and the Celtics, especially Rondo). He was brought in to replace Marquis Daniels and he has already done that.

by bfrombleacher on Apr 5, 2011 7:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Jeff Green's inconsistence didn't start witht he Celtics

In OKC he played starter 35 minutes and they opted to keep Ibaka who is more of a banger on the boards and defense. I like the guy he looks like a finese guy who would rather shoot a jumper than bang in the key. And you all know that when you are a jump shooter, you will not grab as many RB because other bigs closer to the hoop will do that before you get back.
I think he is what he is.

by missyP on Apr 5, 2011 8:41 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm not really worried about Jeff and free agency

Perk could have walked as an unrestricted free agent, leaving the Cs with nothing. Green, OTOH, will be restricted. Therefore, even if he does get a good offer from another club, the Cs could probably workout a sign-and-trade and get something back for him.

My hope is that DA plans to go all in next year and if Green is a part of that, sobeit: Rondo + Green for CP3 in 2011 and D. Howard as a free agent in 2012?

Of course, depending on labor negotiations and other deals, it might be worth hanging on to Green. If the Cs can obtain complimentary players, he and Rondo are a good start. The C’s would need to land a true #1 somewhere though, and I’m not sure how that is possible.

by Jon Niednagel on Apr 5, 2011 8:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, I don't think the market this off season is going to push him up that much.

More than likely, than anything else I wouldn’t be surprised if Green just decides not to sign anywhere else, and play out his last year then become unrestricted the year after. I’d be shocked if there was a big market for him right now.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

????

“JG’s brain type leaves a little something to be desired.”

?

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

there sure are a LOT of unknowns next year

if we end up not being able to contend next year, don’t be surprised to see Danny go aggressive in dealing out all these expiring contracts to bring both a superstar as well as possibly leverage up in the draft.

KG’s contract could bring us someone huge (Howard?).

Some of the others could be packaged with the Clippers conditional pick to maybe get a more liquid #1 pick.

Lots of possibilities depending on the CBA negotiations, whether we have a lockout, whether we have a short season, whether we still have anyting left in the tank for another run next year …

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

No way Orlando ever trades Howard.

Ever. If they lose him, it will be free agency only. Howard’s not the type to come out and say “I’m not going to sign in Orlando” and he’s actually already expressed interest in resigning. You have to take all of that with a grant of salt obviously, but the point is, Orlando will do everything possible to extend him. If they fail, he’ll go to FA, then maybe you could swing a sign and trade, but I just don’t see Orlando doing anything to help Boston in that case.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

probably true

I don’t see us getting him in FA though. We won’t go far enough under the cap to make it possible to sign Howard as a FA and also still have room to fill out the rest of the team.

For us to get Howard, we’ll need to stay over the cap and do it by trade. I agree with you that that is not likely, but anything is possible and I would not rule out how creative Danny Ainge can be.

"We will take it easy, and walk on down our road at our pace with our focus ahead, and your focus on us." - Warrior Spirit, on what Celtics' Ubuntu is.

by mmmmm on Apr 5, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not going to happen...

Expiring deals are only part of the equation nowadays…you’ve got to be giving something of value as well. The Clippers pick is a true asset – as is Glen Davis. KG is an asset for his skill level right now, but he’s also virtually untrade-able due to his desire to be on a contending team and his loyalty to a specific club – he won’t show up to another squad, which makes him just an expiring deal…one that would dramatically hurt the Celtics rep.

KG is also likely to keep starting PF skills for another 3-4 seasons, he’s that good, Karl Malone good…its more likely that this team goes in the “Portland Trail Blazers” direction from the late 90’s where they load up on vets for supporting roles and add quality young players to be the offensive focal points that they grow.

For me – I look at Rondo, Bradley, and Green as the start of that. I think that Glen Davis and that Clips pick might be a very intriguing way to get into the top 3 in this years draft, because its considered “weak” and there is uncertainty with the labor deal going into the offseason.

What I’d like to see is for the Celtics to swap into the top 3 this year and snag Derrick Williams – a true PF with star potential – and grow him behind KG while he finishes out his career.

Rebuilding into a title contender will be tough to do, but maintaining a title contender by adding high-level talent to the current base is a much simpler proposition. KG and Allen are almost locks to sign extensions that match Pierce’s deal, if that’s the direction the team wants to go in.

Using the draft and the free agent market to target a couple of key focal pieces for the future while the current group is still here is the way i’d go personally.

by BillfromBoston on Apr 5, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Good News is that the Celtics have options...

Ainge has set this team up to have maximum flexibility from 2012 onward.

The contract negotiations on Green, Davis, West, and Krstic will give us the best indication of what Ainge intends to do. Obviously if he refuses to sign Green and Davis (or any other guy) to a deal past 2012 then a big (coughHowardcough) Free Agent is likely the target. I know that isn’t the most likely of possibilities but Ainge has positioned himself to be a player in that if he so decides.

Outside of that I agree with BillfromBoston on Ray and KG are both guys that could be effective through 2014. I like the young core of Rondo, Bradley, Green and the Clippers pick. I don’t know enough about the prospects in this draft to really favor packing Davis and the Clips pick to move up. I believe in Ainge to be able to find pieces in the draft to build around an aging core of Ray, Paul and Kevin until 2014.

But I am not going to rule out the possibility of Ainge making himself a player in the Howard sweepstakes until I see him invest in players past 2012.

Basketball is like war in that offensive weapons are developed first, and it always takes a while for the defense to catch up. - Red Auerbach

by IanMello on Apr 5, 2011 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jeff Green should play like James Worthy

Hate like hell to use a Fake reference, but they are of similar physical stature, both fast to get out out on the wing and finish at the rim. With that said, they need to get him the ball in those situations. Same in the half court, just think “exploit matchup” like was done vs. SAS game (Matt Bonner).

- JoeB

by joeb on Apr 5, 2011 10:21 AM EDT reply actions  

To Soon To Judge Green

This is his fourth year. He’s played on a team dominated by 2 players. He’s never played on a team like this Celtic team. He’s never had the benefit of playing for a coach like Doc and be aided by veterans like the Celtics have. His game is not fully developed. He has the skills. He doesn’t know yet where he fits in with the Celtics and without practices it’s been hard for him to find out. We are now judging him by his gentle personality and what he has done on the floor in a difficult situation for a young player. He asked to have his locker moved next to KG’s which shows me that he realizes he needs someone to set an example for him. Hopefully he’ll come thru for us in a big way in the playoffs, but we can only expect so much from him thus far.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Apr 5, 2011 10:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Jeff Green and JO - judging and pre-judging

You are right on target about judging Jeff Green and expecting answers to the questions like the ones Jeff Clark has raised.

I note a lot of praise here for JO and I like that, but it seemed a lot of folks here were unjustifiably dumping on him as being useless/ washed up back at the beginning of the season as he was trying to get assimilated. He has never, I don’t think, had the opportunity to play along side someone like KG and the synergy of that combination, I am sensing, will have some nice benefits for both. From the very short time in these few games together, their defensive potential after getting some experience could be way up there, if they can get some time together and can stay healthy. Could be even better next year if they can hold up.

Similarly, we shouldn’t try to make hard judgments about Jeff Green or expect nuanced Celtic use of his skills and strengths this year. It is completely premature and unfair to make judgments about him in the ways that Jeff Clark and others here are impatient to know. With the short time he’s been with the Celtics and without the benefit of training camp to assimilate and learn the system, he is limited in the ways he can contribute and the ways the Celtics can use him. He has often seemed unsure and prone to mistakes and he and the Celts have to do the best they can with these the circumstances. And the best they can do could still be quite valuable in this playoff drive ahead.

But he is not a veteran with that much experience, so that a midseason transition like he’s had would be more difficult than for a more seasoned vet and it would be difficult even for them. It’s apparent that his outside shot is inconsistent, but even with that he can be a terrific addition for his other skills and a valuable contributor even with that and current limitations. For the future, if he can get his shot and shot selection more consistent his upside on this team is terrific with his attitude and the teamwork emphasis in his background. Better understanding of the system and his role, alone, should improve his shooting consistency/selection along with other mistakes. Celts did not trade for him not to resign him, but CBA needs to be worked out.

by SteveZ from Edgemont on Apr 6, 2011 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's no doubt he's a talented player, but...

Jeff needs to be more aggressive on the defense and offense. Get the ball and go to hard to rack, if he’s open shoot the ball and etc. Green is gonna be need especially when playoff time comes.

by KWW on Apr 5, 2011 12:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Jeff needs to be more aggressive on the defense and offense. Get the ball and go hard to rack, if he’s open shoot the ball and etc. Green is gonna be depended on a lot especially when playoff time comes. Being that the Celtics turned off the switch after the trade and now sits at # 3 or possibly 2, Green and the other reserves are going to have to step up big time.

by KWW on Apr 5, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think doc has to become more creative on how he uses green and so does rondo. let’s get more for ray while we’re at it,

by nazzbo on Apr 5, 2011 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

What is perplexing is, you look at this guy and his skill set and athleticism and you think, wow, this guy should be awesome. And then you watch him play, and sometimes he is awesome, but most of the time he seems to be hovering somewhere over there, off of the radar completely

by jurrasicearl on Apr 5, 2011 1:27 PM EDT reply actions  

because he is a lamb

needs a mean streak.
Even Ray has a mean streak

by tommyfan on Apr 5, 2011 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah. not sure that is something that can be cultivated at this point.

by jurrasicearl on Apr 5, 2011 1:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Ibaka made Green expendable

and he’s not nearly the offensive player that Green is. BUT, he’s a monster on the boards and a much better defensive player AND he hustles. Maybe more importantly he SHOWS his energy and passion. Perk was that way for us. Green has skill no question but so far there are way too many times when he’s on the floor where’s he’s invisible. I really think he can flourish in the second unit if paired with delonte, Baby and JO. When Rondo’s in the game the only time he looks for green is on the homerun pass. the rest of the time he’s looking for pierce or KG or Allen. THe thing about personality is that people generally don’t change. I think Green could be a major weapon for us but I also think a coach like Doc tends to limit young players and new players. Green has to hit the boards and run the floor and use his athleticism. if he can do that he can help us in the playoffs

by Red2 on Apr 5, 2011 3:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Not everyone plays like that...

…wearing their emotion on their sleeves – that’s different from not caring. There are many quality players who don’t play with that energy and passion poring out into everything they do. Green is a tactician. You put him in a role that takes advantage of his skills and empower him to do more on the court and he’ll respond.

His inconsistencies in OKC had far more to do with the inconsistency of his usage and role than it did with his personal inability to remain consistent. Jeff Green doesn’t step on toes – he was acquiescent to Durant and Westbrook’s ball-dominant offensive tendencies and he’s doing the same here.

You get out what you put into Jeff Green’s role…its not a “bad” thing, it just is…

by BillfromBoston on Apr 5, 2011 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well said.

It goes along with a common saying I like “You can’t have all Chiefs, someone has to be the Indian” makes sense in Basketball to. Basically, they can’t all be KG, who’s energy and passion is the source of both his greatest strength, and greatest weakness. You need others like Green, and in many ways like Shaq is as well, who balance that out.

It’s not a bad thing he is the way he is, like Bill said, it just is.

"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach

04 + 07 = 11

by Sizzlack on Apr 5, 2011 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

they have to sign Green otherwise

they will get killed by the fans and the press.

by Red2 on Apr 5, 2011 3:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Never make moves based on fans or media.

Period.

Basketball is like war in that offensive weapons are developed first, and it always takes a while for the defense to catch up. - Red Auerbach

by IanMello on Apr 5, 2011 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here we go. Another 0 points 1 rebound state line for Jeff green. If only they’d use him the right way! Lol

by jurrasicearl on Apr 5, 2011 8:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Stat line

by jurrasicearl on Apr 5, 2011 8:31 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?
Small
MVP's in Game7

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi